The effect of suture fixation of type I coronoid fractures on the kinematics and stability of the elbow with and without medial collateral ligament repair

Effectiveness of an All-arthroscopic Procedure for Terrible Triad Injuries at 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of allarthroscopic treatment of terrible triad of the elbow over a minimum of 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with terrible triad injury who underwent all-arthroscopic surgery between January 2011 and June 2018. We performed all-arthroscopic treatment for these patients, excluding those with a Regan-Morrey type III coronoid process fracture, involvement of the anteromedial facet, or a radial head fracture involving >50% of the articular surface. Elbow stability, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and radiologic outcomes were assessed at least 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, and mean age was 49.5±15.9 years. At a mean follow-up of 6.9±1.8 years, mean arc of flexion for the affected elbow was 7.1°±7.4° to 132.4°±10.0°. Mean visual analog scale and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were 1.4±0.6 and 91±15.7 points, respectively. Clinical scores and range of motion showed no significant differences between the affected and contralateral elbows. Nonunion of the coronoid process occurred in 4 cases, but none led to instability or required reoperation. Heterotopic ossification was observed for 15 patients (47%), grade 1 arthritis for 7 patients (22%), and grade 3 arthritis for 3 patients (9%), but none progressed to joint stiffness or required reoperation. Two complications required reoperation: 1 case of pin site irritation that resolved after pin removal and 1 case of worsening arthritic degeneration leading to total elbow arthroplasty at 5-year follow-up. No other complications, such as infection or neurovascular injury, were observed.

CONCLUSION

In terrible triad elbow injuries, all-arthroscopic treatment restores elbow joint stability and achieves good clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with open treatment. We recommend this procedure as a treatment option for patients if the indications are met, such as Regan-Morrey type I or II coronoid process fractures and radial head fractures involving <50% of the articular surface. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(3):e131-e138.].

Fracture patterns, outcomes, and complications of terrible triad injury in elderly patients

HYPOTHESIS

This study hypothesized that patients older than 65 years with terrible triad elbow injuries (TTEI) exhibit complex fracture patterns, a high prevalence of associated injuries, and increased rates of complications and reinterventions.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 29 patients, mean follow-up of 48.7 ± 4.6 months (range 65-78). Fractures were classified according to the Mason and Regan-Morrey classifications. All patients were evaluated by the Mayo Elbow Performance Scale, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Quality of life Visual Analog Scale, EQ5D scores, and range of motion measurement.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72.3 years and 79% were women. Mason Type III (72%) and Reagan-Morrey type II (69%) were the most frequent fracture type. All patients were managed with a lateral approach consisting of repair or replacement of the radial head and repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament; of these patients, 19 underwent re-attachment of the coronoid process or anterior capsule. Mean functional scores were Mayo Elbow Performance Scale 90.3 ± 7.5, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand 18.4 ± 4.6, EQ5D .89 ± 0.33, Quality of life Visual Analog Scale 86.2 ± 21, and Visual Analog Scale 2.2 ± 1.5. Mean postoperative flexo-extension arc of elbow motion was 105° (range, 65°-145°). Two patients (7%) required revision surgery. We did not observe any joint instability in the elbow after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients over 65 years old with a terrible triad elbow injury are at substantial risk of complex fracture patterns, particularly Mason type III radial head fractures and Regan-Morrey type II coronoid fractures. Complications such as joint stiffness and heterotopic ossification are infrequent, while associated capitellum fractures are not rare and should be considered in the assessment as they can impact elbow stability. Despite these challenges, surgical management generally achieves favorable functional outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates.

Management of Elbow Terrible Triad Injuries: A Comprehensive Review and Update

The "terrible triad" of the elbow, encompassing elbow dislocation, radial head fracture, and coronoid process fracture, remains a formidable challenge in orthopaedic practice. Typically, stabilizing structures in the elbow fail from lateral to medial through a posterolateral rotatory force after a fall onto an outstretched upper extremity. Surgery is often needed to repair the lateral ligamentous complex, replace or fix the radial head, possibly repair the anterior capsule or fix the coronoid, and consider medial repair or application of an internal versus external fixator. However, in some challenging cases persistent instability, complications, and loss of function may occur. Rehabilitation focuses on achieving early range of motion to prevent stiffness which can be common after these injuries. By integrating emerging approaches with established practices, this article aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons toward a fundamental understanding of terrible triad injuries and assist with informed management principles of these complex injuries.

Does the coronoid fracture in terrible triad injury always need to be fixed?

BACKGROUND

The ideal treatment of terrble triad injuries and whether fixation of coronoid process fractures is needed or not are still debated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if terrible triad injuries necessitate coronoid fracture fixation and evaluate if non-fixation treatments have similar efficacies and outcomes as fixation-treatments in cases of terrible triad injuries.

METHODS

From August 2011 to July 2020, 23 patients with acute terrible triad injuries without involvement of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were included to evaluate the postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes (minimum follow-up of 20 months). According to the preoperative height loss evaluation of the coronoid process and an intraoperative elbow stability test, seven patients underwent coronoid fracture fixation, and the other eight patients were treated conservatively. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and modified Broberg-Morrey score were evaluated at the last follow-up. In addition, plain radiographs were reviewed to evaluate joint congruency, fracture union, heterotopic ossification, and the development of arthritic changes.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the mean arcs of flexion-extension and supination-pronation values were 118.2° and 146.8° in the fixation group and 122.5° and 151.3° in the non-fixation group, respectively. The mean MEPSs were 96.4 in the fixation group (excellent, nine cases; good, tow cases) and 96.7 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, two cases). The mean modified Broberg-Morrey scores were 94.0 in the fixation group (excellent, sevev cases; good, four cases) and 94.0 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, tow cases). No statistically significant differences in clinical scores and ROM were identified between the two groups. However, the non-fixation group showed a significantly lower height loss of the coronoid process than the fixation group (36.3% versus 54.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the fixation and non-fixation groups in terrible triad injuries.

[Terrible triad injuries]

The complex injury pattern of a posterior elbow dislocation with concomitant radial head and coronoid fractures is usually referred to as a terrible triad injury. Due to the concomitant compromise of several osteoligamentous structures of the elbow joint relevant for stability, these injuries pose a particularly major challenge to the treating trauma surgeons. For this reason, a careful preoperative analysis of all relevant injury components is mandatory in order to make an adequate treatment decision. In most cases, surgical treatment addressing all elements relevant for stability is necessary to achieve a stable and congruent elbow joint. Only this enables early functional follow-up treatment and minimizes the complication rate. Delayed or even insufficient treatment with persistent (sub)dislocation must be avoided at all costs, otherwise there is a high risk of serious posttraumatic functional disorders of the elbow with rapid progression of osteoarthritis.

Comparison of different treatment approaches for coronoid process fracture in terrible triad injury: a multicenter, randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare the functional results of different treatment approaches for the fracture of the coronoid process in terrible triad injury (TTI).

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled trial included participants from seven level-1 trauma centres in China. All patients were randomly assigned to three groups, wherein different approaches were applied to treat coronoid fracture: group A) internal fixation of the coronoid process without external fixation or splint (ORIF group), B) external fixation using a hinged fixator without internal fixation (Exfix group), and C) long-arm plaster for two to three weeks postoperatively without internal fixation of coronoid process (Plaster group). Early active motion exercises within the limits of pain were started immediately after surgery under the supervision of a physical therapist. Outcomes were evaluated at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients (22 patients in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 22 in Group C) were included in this trial from January 2016 to January 2019. The average arc of elbow motion was 114.1° ± 8.92°. The average flexion and flexion contracture were 126.4° ± 11.2° and 12.3° ± 7.7°, respectively. The arcs of forearm rotation of the elbow for each group were 145.41° ± 9.36°, 143.38° ± 9.79°, and 143.86° ± 10.95°, respectively. The MEPS for each group were 86.82 ± 9.7, 86.67 ± 9.92, and 85.23 ± 8.66, respectively. The DASH score for each group were 18.26 ± 19.31, 18.85 ± 15.02, and 20.19 ± 13.59, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All three approaches in our trial showed similar functional results in the long-term survey. Patients treated with external fixation without internal fixation of the coronoid process showed less pain during early mobilization and acquired maximum flexion within a short duration after surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Adams Type IV Anterolateral Fracture of the Ulna Coronoid Process

OBJECTIVE

Anterolateral coronal fractures are so rare that the mechanism of injury, the type of combined fracture and ligament injury, and the optimal treatment are unknown. To study the outcome of surgical treatments for anterolateral (AL) fracture of the ulna coronoid process (Adams Type IV) and summarize the characteristics of this type of fracture and to guide clinical applications.

METHODS

From February 2015 to April 2021, 32 patients were included in the study. All patients had standard radiography with anteroposterior and lateral views, computed tomography, and intraoperative fluoroscopy. All patients were treated surgically. Surgery-related information, including surgical approach, operation duration, blood loss, and repairing the lateral collateral ligament and the medial collateral ligament integrity, were recorded. The patient's clinical details, such as the final range of motion (ROM), the Broberg-Morrey scores and the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the last follow-up, were described. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We divided patients into two groups according to the anterolateral coronoid fracture morphology. In the intact group, 20 patients with an intact anterolateral coronoid fracture fragment. In the comminuted group, 12 patients with comminuted anterolateral coronoid fracture fragments extended the less sigmoid notch of the ulna. There was no difference in age, sex, total incision length, follow-up duration, and recovery with rehabilitation among the two groups (all Ps >0.05). The other follow-up outcomes, such as elbow ROM (Flexion, Extension, Posterior rotation, Anterior rotation), VAS score, or Broberg-Morrey scores, were not different between the two groups (all Ps >0.05). Both groups achieved relatively satisfactory clinical outcomes, and the Broberg-Morrey score and index excellence rate reached 84.38%. There is a statistical difference in the history of elbow dislocation (P = 0.017), radial head fracture type (P = 0.041), operation duration (P = 0.014) and blood loss at operation (P = 0.029) between the two groups. Cannulated screws, anchors, and sutures were used as point fixation in the coronoid process of the ulna. There was a statistical difference between the two groups in the choice of internal fixation (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

For anterolateral ulnar coronoid fractures with different degrees of comminution, effective and reliable surgical treatment can achieve better results and fewer complications.

Current concepts in the management of "Terrible Triad" injuries of the elbow

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow are complex injuries which can result in long term complications and significant disability. They must be identified correctly, and managed appropriately in order to maximise functional outcomes. A clear understanding of the bony and ligamentous anatomy is essential to plan appropriate surgical reconstruction to provide elbow stability. Urgent reduction of the elbow, followed by 3-dimensional imaging and surgical repair or replacement of the injured structures is the mainstay of treatment in the majority of cases. This review presents a summary of the relevant anatomy and the evidence for the management of these complex injuries.

Coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries can be safely treated without fixation

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow (TTI) remains topic of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to determine whether different treatment strategies for coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries influences the clinical and radiological results in a mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 62 patients with surgical treatment of a TTI including a coronoid tip fracture (37 women, 25 men; mean age, 51 years) were available for follow-up assessment after an average of 4.2 years (range 24-110 months). Thirteen patients had O'Driscoll 1.1 and 49 O'Driscoll 1.2 coronoid fractures, of which 26 were treated with and 36 without fixation. Range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as grip strength were evaluated. Radiographs were analyzed for all participants.

RESULTS

No significant benefit in outcome variables could be detected between patients, whose coronoid had been fixed, compared to patients without fixation of the coronoid. In the coronoid fixation group, patients had mean outcome scores of 81.5 ± SD 19.1 (range 35-100) for MEPS, 31.0 ± SD 12.5 (range 11-48) for OES and 27.7 ± SD 23 (range 0-61) for DASH score, while in the no-fixation group, mean MEPS was 90.8 ± SD 16.5 (range 40-100), mean OES was 39.0 ± SD 10.4 (range 16-48) and mean DASH score was 14.5 ± SD 19.9 (range 0-48). Mean range of motion was 116° ± SD 21° (range 85-140°) versus 124° ± SD 24° (range 80-150°) in extension-flexion and 158° ± SD 23° (range 70-180°) versus 165° ± SD 12° (range 85-180°) in pronation-supination. Overall complication rate was 43.5% and revision rate was 24.2%, with no significant differences between both groups. Suboptimal results were more frequently seen in patients who had degenerative or heterotopic changes on their latest radiograph.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient elbow stability and good outcomes can be achieved in most patients with TTI and coronoid tip fractures. Although some bias in treatment allocation and group heterogeneity cannot be completely omitted, our analysis detected no significant benefit in outcome when the coronoid tip fracture has been fixed compared to patients with non-fixed coronoid tip. Therefore, we would suggest a no-fixation approach for coronoid tip fractures as primary treatment in TTI of the elbow.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Is Repair of a Small Coronoid Fracture Required in the Surgical Treatment of Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow?

Background: Multiple treatment protocols have been described in literature for the treatment of terrible triad injury (TTI) of the elbow. We believe that repair of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) should be performed in preference to repair of a small coronoid fracture if the elbow is unstable after fixation/replacement of the radial head and repair of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with TTI associated with a small coronoid fracture in whom the coronoid fracture was not addressed. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series of 12 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute TTI with a small coronoid fracture (9 Regan-Morrey type I and 3 Regan-Morrey type II). Ten patients had complete MCL injuries. All patients underwent repair of the torn LCL and MCL and treatment of the radial head. The coronoid fracture was not surgically treated. At the final follow-up, the range of motion, degree of flexion contracture, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) were measured. Results: The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months. At the final follow-up, the mean arc of elbow flexion was 132° and the mean flexion contracture was 10°. The mean arc of forearm rotation was 148°. None of the patients demonstrated elbow instability. The mean MEPS was 92.5 points with seven having excellent results and five having good results. The average DASH score was 11.2 points. Conclusions: Our results showed that good elbow stability, arc of motion and clinical outcomes could be achieved without repair of small coronoid fractures in the treatment of TTI. The repair of MCL injuries should be given priority over the fixation of small coronoid fractures to regain elbow stability. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

[Extensor digitorum communis split approach combined with loop-plate technique for treatment of ulnar coronoid fracture in terrible triad of elbow]

Objective

To explore the effectivenesss of simple lateral extensor digitorum communis (EDC) split approach combined with loop-plate fixation in the treatment of ulnar coronoid fracture in terrible triad of elbow (TTE).

Methods

The clinical data of 60 patients with TTE who met the selection criteria between January 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 48 males and 12 females, aged from 18 to 60 years (mean, 37.4 years). All the patients were closed fractures. Injury causes included fall injury in 28 cases, falling from height in 20 cases, and traffic accident injury in 12 cases. All patients had no vascular and nerve injury, and the time from injury to operation was 1-14 days, with an average of 4.8 days. The height and size of the fracture of the coronal process were measured by CT and accurate classifications were made. All the 60 patients were treated with simple lateral EDC split approach combined with loop-plate to fix the ulnar coronoid fracture; 20 patients of radial head fracture were fixed with hollow screw, 32 patients with mini-plate fixation, 8 patients with radial head prosthesis replacement; 16 patients with suture and 44 patients with suture anchor to reconstruct lateral collateral ligament complex; 10 patients with residual instability of elbow joint were fixed with hinge external fixator, and others were fixed with adjustable tension brace after operation. Postoperative imaging examination was performed to evaluate fracture healing and complications, such as loosening or breakage of internal fixator, osteoarthritis, and heterotopic ossification, etc. During follow-up, the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint was recorded, including elbow flexion, extension, and forearm pronation, supination. Mayo elbow function score system (MEPS) was used to evaluate elbow joint function at last follow-up.

Results

All patients were followed up 16-24 months (mean, 20.2 months). All incisions healed by first intention after operation, and no complications such as vascular nerve injury, elbow joint instability, internal fixation failure, and infection occurred; the fracture healing time was 9-17 weeks (mean, 11.7 weeks). Four cases developed elbow stiffness after operation, and all underwent elbow joint lysis with internal fixator removal within 12-15 months after operation; 10 cases developed heterotopic ossification without special treatment. At last follow-up, the ROM of elbow flexion ranged from 85° to 135° (mean, 116°), the ROM of elbow extension ranged from 0° to 20° (mean, 11°), the ROM of forearm pronation ranged from 55° to 75° (mean, 70°), and the ROM of forearm supination ranged from 60° to 90° (mean, 83°). The MEPS score ranged from 55 to 100 (mean, 86.1); the effectiveness were excellent in 40 patients, good in 10 patients, fair in 6 patients, and poor in 4 patients, with an excellent and good rate of 83.3%.

Conclusion

The simple lateral EDC split approach is fully exposed, and the loop-plate can fix the ulnar coronoid fractures firmly and stably, which can restore the stability of the elbow joint, and the effectiveness is satisfactory.

The treatment of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process are caused by a varus posteromedial rotational injury force, leading to instability in the ulnohumeral joint. AMF fractures are usually accompanied by avulsion of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). O'Driscoll's description and classification of AMF coronoid fractures has increased awareness and interest in this injury, but the optimal treatment has yet to be decided.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and Embase. The primary objective was to determine outcome scores but also complication and revision rates depending on the fracture and its therapy in order to gain a more comprehensive picture. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

Initially, 304 publications were identified. Finally, 10 studies were left for inclusion, all of them retrospective in design, comprising 128 patients; the majority of them were male (75.7%). A total of 114 patients (89.1%) were treated surgically and 14 patients (10.9%) were treated conservatively. Among the surgically treated patients, 70.2% were treated with LUCL refixation. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the surgically treated patients was 91.5 points. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the conservatively treated patients was 91.4 points. A total of 10 patients (7.8%) required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Surgery of AMF fractures leads to a satisfactory functional outcome in the vast majority of patients independent of the subtype. An algorithm for LUCL fixation is still pending. Conservative treatment may be considered under strict preconditions, especially for nondisplaced subtype 1 and 2 fractures, as these fractures show satisfactory functional outcomes when treated nonoperatively.

Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted vs. open reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures of the ulna

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications for arthroscopy-assisted vs. open reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures in patients with complex elbow fracture-dislocations.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with complex elbow fracture-dislocations who underwent surgical fixation for coronoid fractures of the ulna from March 2009 to January 2016. Subjects included those who received either arthroscopy-assisted (group A) or open surgery (group O) for coronoid fractures and concurrent reconstruction of the lateral column (radial head and/or lateral ulnar collateral ligament) with follow-up for at least 2 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale for pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score at 2 years after surgery. For radiographic assessment, union of the coronoid, development of heterotopic ossification, and arthritic changes were evaluated. We also reviewed surgery-related complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (mean age, 40.0 ± 12.4 years) were enrolled in this study (group A, 15 patients; group O, 10 patients), and there were no statistical differences in baseline data between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups. All fractures were united and that the prevalence of heterotopic ossification and arthritic changes were similar between the 2 groups. However, operation-related complications were more common in group O than in group A (group A, 13.3%; group O, 40.0%), including 1 patient who underwent ulnar nerve neurolysis and anterior transposition at 3 months after the initial operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Eliciting fewer complications, arthroscopy-assisted reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures shows union rates and clinical results comparable to open fixation in patients with complex elbow fracture-dislocation.

Elbow Fracture-Dislocations: Determining Treatment Strategies

Elbow dislocations represent common injuries. A quarter of these injuries involve at least 1 fracture. The sequel of elbow fracture-dislocations can be fraught with complications, including recurrent instability, posttraumatic arthritis, elbow contracture, and poor functional results. The 3 main patterns of injury are valgus posterolateral rotatory instability, varus posteromedial rotatory instability, and transolecranon fracture-dislocation. This article discusses each pattern individually, including the anatomy, the typical injury pattern, and treatment strategies. It also discusses common complications that can occur.

Does the Coronoid Always Need to Be Fixed in Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow? Mid-Term Postoperative Outcomes Following a Standardized Protocol

The purpose of this study was to investigate mid-term outcomes and complications after operative treatment according to a standardized protocol for terrible triad injuries. Twenty-four patients that were treated by a single surgeon with a standardized surgical protocol were retrospectively reviewed. After the complete reconstruction of radial head and/or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex through a lateral approach, coronoid process, and/or medial collateral ligament (MCL) complex through a medial approach were fixed if the elbow is unstable. For coronoid fractures, only type III were fixed in four cases (16.7%). Twenty-two LCL (91.7%) and five MCL (20.8%) complexes were repaired. At the final follow-up, the mean MEPS and Quick-DASH score were 91.5 and 17.3, respectively. There was no recurrent instability after operation in all cases. This study revealed that operative treatment that was based on our standardized protocol for terrible triad injuries yielded satisfactory mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes without any recurrent instability. These results suggest that Type I and II coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries do not need to be fixed if the radial head and ligamentous complex are completely reconstructed.

Elbow Dislocation

This article is a brief overview of the elbow dislocations focusing on updates in treatment and rehabilitation protocols. The fight between obtaining elbow stability without leading to long-term elbow stiffness has been a continued focus in field of sports medicine. This article highlights advances made to help treat the injuries appropriately and obtain optimal patient outcomes.

Functional outcomes after treatments for different types of isolated ulnar coronoid fracture: A protocol for systematic review

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatments for ulnar coronoid fracture have yet to be determined. We aimed to systematically review treatment efficacy assessed by functional outcomes of patients with isolated ulnar coronoid fracture.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting quantitative outcomes data after surgical treatment for isolated ulnar coronoid fractures up to July 16, 2019. Functional outcomes determined using disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score; Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS); and range of motion were systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 65 patients with isolated coronoid fracture who had received surgical treatment were included. All studies were of good quality according to a modified Delphi checklist. Most patients had Type II fractures based on Regan-Morrey or O'Driscoll classification. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores were reported by 2 studies (mean range 5-17). Four studies reported MEPS (mean range 89-98). One study reported Broberg-Morrey scores, in which 93% patients achieved excellent or good outcomes. Five studies reported range of motion, with mean flexion ranging from 122 to 137 and mean extension ranging from 4.0 to 21 degrees. Quantitative analyses revealed that lateral, medial, or posterior approaches in treating Type II fractures are associated with higher postoperative MEPS and flexion scores than the anteromedial approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment efficacy assessed by functional outcomes for isolated ulnar coronoid fractures is overall satisfactory. Whether lateral, medial, or posterior approaches lead to more favorable outcomes than the anteromedial approach is inconclusive. Further prospective studies are warranted.

A retrospective comparative cohort study of radial head arthroplasty versus resection in complex elbow dislocations

INTRODUCTION

The management of radial head fractures for the treatment of complex elbow dislocations remains controversial. Until the publication of recent therapeutic algorithms, different actions have been carried out, including resection or arthroplasty of the radial head. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted between the years 2001 and 2016 in complex elbow dislocations associating comminuted fractures of the radial head (Mason type IV) for two cohorts: 20 patients who received a radial head prosthesis against 12 patients treated with resection. At the end of the follow-up, two functional valuation scales were applied: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH). Radiological study included the presence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossifications in both groups; and specific complications in the group of patients treated with an arthroplasty.

RESULTS

The average age of the sample was 52.2 years in the prosthesis group, and 58.5 for the resection group, with a mean follow-up of 83.8 and 163 months respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean values of the MEPS scale between the two groups (p = 0.5). The mean DASH score was significantly higher in the resection group (29.8 versus 10.3 with p = 0.006). A significantly higher rate of reinterventions and heterotopic ossifications was documented in the group of patients treated with radial head excision. The rate of specific radiological complications in the prosthesis group was 45%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although radial head resection could be a valid treatment in this group of patients, radial head arthroplasty would remain as the main option for the treatment of these lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.

Anterior capsule re-attachment in terrible triad elbow injury with coronoid tip fracture

BACKGROUND

During the surgical treatment of terrible triad elbow injury (TTEI), the usefulness of re-attaching the anterior joint capsule when the coronoid tip is fractured remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to assess potential benefits during surgery for TTEI of re-attaching the joint capsule when the coronoid tip is fractured.

HYPOTHESIS

Re-attaching the anterior joint capsule in TTEI with a fractured coronoid tip improves clinical and radiological outcomes and decreases the complication and revision rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery at the acute phase of TTEI with a fractured coronoid tip. In all patients, a physical examination and elbow radiographs were performed at least 1year after surgery. A statistical analysis was done to compare the groups with vs. without re-attachment of the anterior capsule and coronoid tip.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients, 16 females and 14 males, with a mean age of 51years (range: 21-84years). Among them, 11 did and 19 did not undergo re-attachment. The two groups were comparable regarding demographic features and follow-up duration. No significant differences were found at last follow-up for flexion-extension motion arc (p=0.75), pronation-supination motion arc (p=0.3051), or the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p=0.19). Radiographic evidence of humero-radial osteoarthritis was significantly more common in the absence of re-attachment (p=0.04), whereas no differences were evidenced regarding humero-ulnar osteoarthritis (p=0.73), the occurrence of subluxation or dislocation (p=0.43), or loosening of the radial head implant (p=0.47). The complication and revision rates were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, re-attaching the anterior capsule during the surgical treatment of TTEI with a coronoid tip fracture did not improve the clinical or radiographic outcomes after a mean follow-up of 54months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Buttress plate fixation of coronoid process fractures via a medial approach

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of coronoid process fractures surgically managed with buttress plate fixation via a medial approach.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all coronoid fractures surgically fixed in our institution using a buttress plate technique via a medial approach between June 2012 and April 2015 by the senior author was performed. These fractures were all sizeable fractures contributing to persistent elbow instability in terrible triad or varus posteromedial rotatory instability injury patterns. A prospective telephone questionnaire was conducted to assess patient outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and Mayo hlbow performance score (MEPS).

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study, comprising 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 39 years (range, 19-72 years). Mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 4-18 months). The average time to radiographic union was 4 months (range, 3-7 months). Range of motion measurements at final follow-up were obtained in 11 out of 12 patients, with one patient defaulting follow-up. All 11 patients displayed a functional elbow range of motion of at least 30°-130°, with an average arc of motion of 130° (range, 110° -140°), mean elbow flexion of 134° (range, 110° -140°) and mean flexion contracture of 3° (range, 0° -20°). The mean DASH score was 16 (range, 2.5-43.8) and the mean MEPS was 75 (range, 65-100). Complications observed included one patient with a superficial wound infection which resolved with a course of oral antibiotics and one patient with radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification which was conservatively managed. No residual elbow instability was observed and no reoperations were performed.

CONCLUSION

Buttress plate fixation via a medial approach of coronoid process fractures that contribute to persistent elbow instability represents a reliable method of treatment that produces satisfactory and predictable outcomes.

Posteromedial rotatory incongruity of the elbow: a computational kinematics study

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to analyze the effect of different anteromedial coronoid fracture patterns with different combinations of ligamentous repairs. We hypothesized that smaller fractures would be sufficiently treated with ligamentous repair alone but that larger fragments would require a combination of ligament and bony repair versus reconstruction.

METHODS

Two multibody models were created from cadaveric specimens in the ADAMS program. Four different conditions were simulated: (1) no fracture, (2) O'Driscoll anteromedial subtype I (2.5-mm) fracture, (3) subtype II 2.5-mm fracture, and (4) subtype II 5-mm fracture. In each of these conditions, 3 ligament repairs were studied: lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (pMCL), and both LUCL and pMCL. For each condition, kinematics and articular contact areas were calculated.

RESULTS

LUCL repair alone increases whereas pMCL repair decreases internal rotation of the ulna relative to all tested posteromedial rotatory instability conditions; their rotational effects are summative when both ligaments are repaired. With a subtype I fracture and both pMCL and LUCL injuries, repairing the LUCL alone corrects angulation whereas rotational stability is satisfactory through the arc from 0° to 90°. In a subtype II 2.5-mm fracture, isolated repair of the LUCL or pMCL is not capable of restoring rotation or angulation. For a subtype II 5-mm fracture, no combination of ligamentous repairs could restore rotation or angulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that LUCL repair alone is sufficient to restore kinematics for small subtype I fractures for an arc avoiding deep flexion; whereas nearly normal kinematics throughout the arc of motion can be achieved if the pMCL is also repaired. Larger anteromedial coronoid fractures should ideally have fragments fixed in addition to ligament repairs.

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability: a biomechanical analysis of posterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been growing interest in the involvement of the posterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (pMUCL) in varus posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI). Varus PMRI has been observed clinically, but the degree of involvement of the pMUCL remains unclear. This study assessed the degree to which the pMUCL is involved in stabilizing the elbow and the feasibility of a pMUCL reconstruction to restore stability.

METHODS

Movements simulating PMRI were performed in 8 cadaveric elbows. Joint gapping values were obtained by 3-dimensional motion capture for the proximal and distal aspects of the ulnohumeral joint. Specimens were assessed at "intact," "cut coronoid + pMUCL," "reconstruction," and "cut anterior aspect MUCL + reconstruction" conditions with mechanical testing at 30°, 60°, and 90° of elbow flexion.

RESULTS

Proximal joint gapping significantly increased from intact to cut coronoid + pMUCL at 60° and 90°, and distal joint gapping significantly increased at 90°. In the reconstruction condition, joint gapping across the proximal joint at 60° and 90° significantly recovered, as did distal joint gapping at 90°. In the cut anterior aspect MUCL + reconstruction condition, no significant increase occurred in proximal or distal joint gapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Transection of the pMUCL with a coronoid fracture leads to increased joint gapping, suggesting the presence of PMRI. PMRI can still occur with an intact lateral ligamentous complex. A pMUCL tendon graft reconstruction confers some elbow stability in this injury mechanism.

Outcomes following surgical management of complex terrible triad injuries of the elbow: a single surgeon case series

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow are complex injuries to treat and we report our outcomes following surgical management.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent fixation of terrible triad injuries between 2007 and 2012 were identified. Clinical outcomes were assessed by examination, visual analogue scores (VAS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and QuickDash score (QD).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 47 years, with a mean follow-up of 32 months. All patients underwent lateral ligament repair, with additional medial ligament repair in four cases. Thirteen patients required repair of the coronoid and 18 patients required surgery to the radial head. The mean flexion-extension arc was 113°, with mean prono-supination of 136°. The functional elbow scores revealed good outcomes in the majority (mean OES of 37, MEPI of 79 and QD of 21). The overall complication rate was 41%. In total, 23% required reoperation, with one patient requiring fasciotomy for acute compartment syndrome and four requiring subsequent removal of metalwork as a result of stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of this complex injury pattern and appropriate restoration of the joint stability are the prerequisites. Systematic surgical approach is effective and can provide both stability and good function, in most cases.

The Posterior Bundle's Effect on Posteromedial Elbow Instability After a Transverse Coronoid Fracture: A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

There has been increased interest in the role of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (pMUCL) in the elbow, particularly its effects on posteromedial rotatory stability. The ligament's effect in the context of an unfixable coronoid fracture has not been the focus of any study. The purposes of this biomechanical study were to evaluate the stabilizing effect of the pMUCL with a transverse coronoid fracture and to assess the effect of graft reconstruction of the ligament.

METHODS

We simulated a varus and internal rotatory subluxation in 7 cadaveric elbows at 30°, 60°, and 90° elbow flexion. The amount of ulnar rotation and medial ulnohumeral joint gapping were assessed in the intact elbow after we created a transverse coronoid injury, after we divided the pMUCL, and finally, after we performed a graft reconstruction of the pMUCL.

RESULTS

At all angles tested, some stability was lost after cutting the pMUCL once the coronoid had been injured, because mean proximal ulnohumeral joint gapping increased afterward by 2.1, 2.2, and 1.3 mm at 90°, 60°, and 30°, respectively. Ulnar internal rotation significantly increased after pMUCL transection at 90°. At 60° and 30° elbow flexion, ulnar rotation increased after resection of the coronoid but not after pMUCL resection.

CONCLUSIONS

An uninjured pMUCL stabilizes against varus internal rotatory instability in the setting of a transverse coronoid fracture at higher flexion angles. Further research is needed to optimize graft reconstruction of the pMUCL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The pMUCL is an important secondary stabilizer against posteromedial instability in the coronoid-deficient elbow. In the setting of an unfixable coronoid fracture, the surgeon should examine for posteromedial instability and consider addressing the pMUCL surgically.

Articular Contact Area and Pressure in Posteromedial Rotatory Instability of the Elbow

BACKGROUND

Joint incongruity in posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) has been theorized to determine early articular degenerative changes. Our hypothesis was that the articular contact area and contact pressure differ significantly between an intact elbow and an elbow affected by PMRI.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric elbows were tested under gravity varus stress using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads and allow passive elbow flexion (0° to 90°). The mean contact area and contact pressure data were collected and processed using the Tekscan sensor and software. After testing the intact specimen (intact elbow), a PMRI injury was simulated (PMRI elbow) and the specimen was tested again.

RESULTS

The PMRI elbows were characterized by initial joint subluxation and significantly elevated articular contact pressure. Both worsened, corresponding with a reduction in contact area, as the elbow was flexed from 0° until the joint subluxation and incongruity spontaneously reduced (at a mean [and standard error] of 60° ± 5° of flexion), at which point the mean contact pressure decreased from 870 ± 50 kPa (pre-reduction) to 440 ± 40 kPa (post-reduction) (p < 0.001) and the mean contact area increased from 80 ± 8 mm to 150 ± 58 mm (p < 0.001). This reduction of the subluxation was also followed by a shift of the contact area from the coronoid fracture edge toward the lower portion of the coronoid. At the flexion angle at which the PMRI elbows reduced, both the contact area and the contact pressure of the intact elbows differed significantly from those of the PMRI elbows, both before and after the elbow reduction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in contact area and increased contact pressures due to joint subluxation and incongruity could explain the progressive arthritis seen in some elbows affected by PMRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This biomechanical study suggests that the early degenerative changes associated with PMRI reported in the literature could be subsequent to joint incongruity and an increase in contact pressure between the coronoid fracture surface and the trochlea.

Outcomes of coronoid-first repair in terrible triad injuries of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of terrible triad injuries (TTIs) of the elbow are historically poor. To date, it is still debatable whether the coronoid needs to be fixed and if so, how and in which sequence.

METHODOLOGY

Between 2010 and 2013, 13 patients were treated surgically for acute TTIs of the elbow at a Tertiary Level 1 Trauma Centre by a single surgeon, using a standardized protocol, which included coronoid-brachialis complex fixation via pull-through trans-osseous sutures, radial head fixation or prosthetic replacement and a repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. Repair of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) was done if valgus-stress test demonstrated persistent instability. Patients were then followed-up with clinical and radiological evaluation by the senior author until fracture union and elbow range of motion reached a plateau. Outcomes measured were range of motion, DASH scores and MEPS, as well as surgical complications.

RESULTS

Intraoperative stability was achieved in all 13 cases, MCL repair was required in 3 cases and application of external fixation was not required in any case. Patients were followed-up for an average length of 27.7 months and the minimum follow-up period was 12 months. The average age of patients was 46.4 years (range 35-79 years old) at the time of trauma. This included eight Regan-Morrey Type I and five Regan-Morrey Type II coronoid fractures, with ten Mason Type I/II and three Mason Type III radial head fractures. The average arc of ulno-humeral motion was 105.0° (range 80°-135°). The average flexion contracture was 15.0° (range 0°-40°). The average supination-pronation arc was 114.9° (range 0°-180°). The average MEPS was 85 of 100 (range 45-100) and the average DASH score was 21.2 of 100 (range 1.7-61.2). A single case of radio-ulnar synostosis, heterotropic ossification and two cases of recurrent elbow instability were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The coronoid-first surgical approach, using a suture-lasso fixation method, has technical benefits for us and showed good clinical success in our series. This is important with postero-medial rotatory instability being common in our series of TTIs. We emphasize not to miss a TTI in an apparently isolated low Mason class radial head fracture.

Complex instability of the elbow

Injuries to the elbow are commonly encountered in orthopaedic practice. They range from low energy, simple isolated fractures, to high energy complex fracture dislocations with severe ligamentous disruption. Recognising the precise pattern of injury is critical in restoring elbow function and preventing chronic instability, pain and weakness. This article discusses the important osseous and ligamentous stabilisers of the elbow joint and provides management protocols for the common patterns of complex injury encountered by the practising surgeon.

Complex coronoid and proximal ulna fractures are we getting better at fixing these?

Technological advances and improved understanding of functional anatomy about the elbow have lead an evolution regarding operative reconstruction of complex proximal ulnar and coronoid fractures. When treating these complex and challenging fractures, goals of anatomic articular restoration along with balanced soft tissue stability can lead to early range of motion and thus, desired functional outcome. The purpose of this review is to outline and provide tips and pearls to achieve desired results, with a comprehensive update on the most recent literature to support the latest fixation methods and techniques.

Arthroscopic Lateral Collateral Ligament Repair

BACKGROUND

Lateral ulnar collateral ligament injury following unstable elbow dislocation can induce posterolateral rotatory instability that requires surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of arthroscopic repair of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex in an unstable elbow joint.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 13 patients who experienced posterolateral rotatory instability after an unstable elbow dislocation with an injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. The diagnosis was confirmed with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and physical examination. The patients underwent arthroscopically assisted surgery between May 2011 and January 2013 and were followed for a minimum of 18 months postoperatively. Coronoid and/or radial head fractures combined with the ligament injury were treated through an arthroscopic technique. Range of motion, pain, outcomes according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Nestor grading system, and surgical complications were evaluated. CT and MRI were performed at 3 months postoperatively, and isometric muscle strength was measured at the time of final follow-up.

RESULTS

At the time of final follow-up, at a minimum of 18 months, all 13 patients reported complete resolution of the instability and average (and standard deviation) extension of 3° ± 1°, flexion of 138° ± 6°, supination of 88° ± 5°, and pronation of 87° ± 6. The mean MEPS was 92 points and, according to this validated outcome score, the results were rated as excellent in 12 patients and good in 1 patient. According to the Nestor grading system, the results were rated as excellent in 11 patients and good in 2. Complete healing was seen on the 3-month follow-up MRI in 12 patients; however, 1 patient had mild widening of the radiocapitellar joint space with incomplete healing but no instability symptoms. All patients demonstrated normal strength on elbow flexion, extension, pronation, and supination at the final follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic repair of the LCL complex in patients with posterolateral rotatory instability after an unstable elbow dislocation, with or without an intra-articular fracture, is an alternative treatment option for restoring elbow stability and achieving satisfactory clinical and radiographic results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Olecranon tip osteoarticular autograft transfer for irreparable coronoid process fracture: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that transfer of the olecranon tip for simulated type III coronoid fracture would restore posterior ulnohumeral translation to a level not different from that in the intact state.

METHODS

The collateral ligaments were left intact in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows, and all other soft tissues were removed. The entire coronoid process was osteotomized flush with the ventral aspect of the ulna and was reconstructed using the tip of the olecranon process. Specimens were tested with an axial load of 100 N at 0.25 mm/s in 15° increments from 15 to 120° of flexion. Intact, osteotomized, and reconstructed posterior ulnohumeral displacement was measured.

RESULTS

The bony reconstruction did not obstruct range of motion of the elbow. Intact translation (mean ± SD) ranged from 0.3 ± 0.1 to 1.1 ± 0.6 mm, and translation in the osteotomized state ranged from 1.3 ± 1.0 to 2.0 ± 1.0 mm. Resection of the coronoid resulted in a significant increase in posterior ulnar translation compared with intact at all flexion angles (p < 0.05) except at 75°. Reconstruction decreased translation versus the osteotomized state at all flexion angles, significantly at 60 and 120°. No significant difference in translation was found between reconstructed and intact states at five of eight positions tested.

CONCLUSIONS

In this biomechanical study of irreparable coronoid fracture, autograft olecranon tip transfer restored posterior elbow stability to a level not significantly different from the intact elbow in five of eight elbow positions tested.

Terrible triad of the elbow: is it still a troublesome injury?

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injury (TTI), one of the main patterns of complex elbow instability, is difficult to treat and yields conflicting surgical results. We analyzed prospectively a series of patient affected by TTI and treated according to the current diagnostic and surgical protocols to investigate whether their application allow to obtain more predictable outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 26 patients with a mean age of 52 years. Preoperative X-rays and CT were performed; all patients were operated by the same elbow surgeon and underwent the same surgical and rehabilitation treatment. Final functional outcome was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick-Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand-score (Q-DASH) and the modified-American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (m-Ases). A radiographic evaluation was also performed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 31 months. At final evaluation, mean flexion, extension, supination and pronation were 137°, 10°, 77° and 79°, respectively; mean MEPS, m-ASES and Q-DASH scores were respectively 96, 91 and 8 points. Complications observed after first surgery were: elbow stiffness in 5 cases, mild posterolateral instability in 3 cases, chronic subluxation in 1 case. Radiographic evaluation showed secondary arthritis in 9 cases, symptomatic HO in 3 cases and late hardware displacement in 2 cases. Six out of 26 patient underwent reoperation with final satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

The current diagnostic and therapeutic protocols allow obtaining satisfactory clinical outcomes in majority of cases but a high number of major and minor unpredictable complications persist yet. In this series, low compliance, obesity, and extensive soft elbow tissue damage caused by high-energy trauma represented negative prognostic factors unrelated to surgery. On the other hand, the strict application of current algorithms by an expert elbow surgeon appears to improve clinical results by reducing the influence of other avoidable negative prognostic factors well known in current literature, such as the incomplete recognition of injuries, delayed treatment, inadequate treatment of bony and ligamentous injuries, prolonged immobilization and, last but not least, the surgeon's inexperience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series, Treatment study.

Biomechanical Concepts for Fracture Fixation

Application of the correct fixation construct is critical for fracture healing and long-term stability; however, it is a complex issue with numerous significant factors. This review describes a number of common fracture types and evaluates their currently available fracture fixation constructs. In the setting of complex elbow instability, stable fixation or radial head replacement with an appropriately sized implant in conjunction with ligamentous repair is required to restore stability. For unstable sacral fractures with vertical or multiplanar instabilities, "standard" iliosacral screw fixation is not sufficient. Periprosthetic femur fractures, in particular Vancouver B1 fractures, have increased stability when using 90/90 fixation versus a single locking plate. Far cortical locking combines the concept of dynamization with locked plating to achieve superior healing of a distal femur fracture. Finally, there is no ideal construct for syndesmotic fracture stabilization; however, these fractures should be fixed using a device that allows for sufficient motion in the syndesmosis. In general, orthopaedic surgeons should select a fracture fixation construct that restores stability and promotes healing at the fracture site, while reducing the potential for fixation failure.

Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow

The treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow continues to evolve. Radial head fixation and arthroplasty, coronoid process fixation, and repair of the lateral collateral ligament continue to be the mainstays of treatment. In the elbow with persistent instability after repair of these elements, application of a static external fixation, hinged external fixation, ulnohumeral joint pinning, or an internal hinge may be needed. In patients who undergo treatment after the acute injury period, the coronoid may require reconstruction using radial head autograft, iliac crest autograft, olecranon autograft, or allograft.

Operative Treatment of Terrible Triad of the Elbow via Posterolateral and Anteromedial Approaches

The aim of the study was to explore the clinical outcome of posterolateral and anteromedial approaches in treatment of terrible triad of the elbow. The study involved 12 patients with closed terrible triad of the elbow treated by posterolateral and anteromedial approaches between January 2010 and June 2012. The mechanism of injury included fall from height in 9 patients and traffic accident in 3. According to O’Driscoll classification for fractures of the ulnar coronoid, there were 11 patients with type Ⅰ and 1 with type Ⅱ fractures. According to Mason classification for fractures of the radial head, there were 3 patients with type Ⅰ, 7 with type Ⅱ and 2 with type Ⅲ fractures. All patients were followed up for 12-27 months (average 15.5 months), which showed no pain or severe pain in all patients except for 2 patients with mild pain. At the last follow-up, the mean flexion was for 125°(range, 90°-140°), the mean extension loss for 20°(range, 0°-70°), the mean pronation for 66°(range, 20°-85°) and the mean supination for 60°(range, 30°-85°). The bony union time was 8-14 weeks (average 11 weeks) and the elbows were stable in flexion-extension and varus-valgus in all patients. The elbows maintained a concentric reduction of both the ulnotrochlear and the radiocapitellar articulation. Mild heterotopic ossification of the elbow occurred in 3 patients at 6 months after operation and mild degenerative change in 1 patient at 18 months after operation. The Broberg and Morrey elbow performance score was 82 points (range, 58-98 points). The results were excellent in 6 patients, good in 4, fair in 1 and poor in 1, with excellence rate of 83.3%. The results showed that the combined posterolateral and anteromedial approaches can facilitate the reduction and fixation of terrible triad of the elbow. Repair of radial head, coronoid, medial and lateral collateral ligaments can sufficiently restore the elbow stability, allow early postoperative motion and enhance the functional recovery.

Single-staged treatment using a standardized protocol results in functional motion in the majority of patients with a terrible triad elbow injury

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow, defined as elbow dislocation with associated fractures to the radial head and coronoid, are associated with stiffness, pain, and loss of motion. Studies to date have consisted of small sample sizes and used heterogeneous surgical techniques, which render comparisons difficult and unreliable.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a group of patients treated under a standard surgical protocol, we sought to determine the early dislocation rate, the range of motion in those not undergoing secondary procedures, the frequency and types of secondary surgical interventions required, the difference in motion between those undergoing secondary surgery and those who did not, and the frequency of heterotopic ossification and patient-reported stiffness.

METHODS

Patients underwent a surgical protocol that involved fixing the coronoid, fixing the radial head if possible, otherwise performing radial head arthroplasty, and repairing the lateral ligamentous structures. Patients were excluded if ipsilateral upper extremity fractures from the humerus to the distal forearm were present. Fifty-two patients had a minimum followup of 6 weeks and were included for the early dislocation rate, and 34 of these (65%) had a minimum of 6 months followup and were included for the rest of the data. Eighteen of the 52 (35%) were considered lost to followup because they were seen for less than 6 months postsurgically and were excluded from further analysis. Chart review was performed to determine the presence of early dislocation within the first 6 weeks after surgery, range of motion in patients not requiring a secondary procedure, the frequency and types of secondary procedures required, the range of motion before and after a secondary procedure if it was required, and postoperative stiffness. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed to determine the presence and severity of heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

One of 52 patients sustained a dislocation within the first weeks of surgery (1.9%). Those not undergoing a secondary procedure were able to achieve a flexion arc of 110° and a supination-pronation arc of 148°. Nine of 34 patients (26%) underwent a secondary surgical procedure with stiffness, heterotopic ossification, and ulnar neuropathy being the most common surgical indications. Before secondary surgical procedures, patients had a flexion arc of 57° and a supination-pronation arc of 55°, which was less than those only requiring primary surgery alone (p < 0.001). After secondary surgery, patients were able to achieve a flexion arc of 96° and a supination-pronation arc of 124°, which was not different from those who did not undergo reoperation (p = 0.09 and p = 0.08, respectively). Twenty-eight of 34 patients demonstrated evidence of heterotopic ossification on radiographs, whereas 20 patients, including all nine undergoing secondary procedures, reported stiffness at the elbow.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a standardized surgical protocol, a low early dislocation rate was observed, although stiffness remains a challenge. Many patients who initially do not attain functional range of motion can usually attain this after secondary procedures aimed at removing the heterotopic ossification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Strategic approach to O'Driscoll type 2 anteromedial coronoid facet fracture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to suggest a strategic approach to the management of anteromedial coronoid facet (AMCF) fracture that is related to posteromedial rotational instability of the elbow through investigation of the surgical outcome of diverse combinations, including internal fixation of AMCF fractures and repair of collateral ligament injury.

METHODS

The study enrolled 18 patients. On the basis of the size of the coronoid fracture and the degree of the soft tissue injuries that were evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and varus stress test under anesthesia, these fractures were managed differently. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale score, modified Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Plain radiographs were used to evaluate the degree of arthrosis.

RESULTS

There were 2 cases of O'Driscoll type 2, subtype 1 fractures; 14 cases of type 2, subtype 2 fractures; and 2 cases of type 2, subtype 3 fractures. Seven cases were managed with only AMCF fracture fixation, 4 cases with only lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair, 6 cases with concomitant repair of the LUCL and AMCF fracture, and 1 case with a conservative method. There were no significant differences among O'Driscoll types and among the subgroups of type 2-2 (P > .05). When the elbow showed instability on the varus stress test after AMCF fracture fixation, the soft tissue injuries of the lateral elbow were more severe (P =. 015). Arthrosis was not correlated with the patient's symptoms (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

AMCF fracture can be treated by only AMCF fracture fixation, only LUCL repair, or a combination of these techniques, depending on the size of the AMCF fracture fragment and the degree of the lateral soft tissue injuries.

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?

BACKGROUND

The "terrible triad" of the elbow is a complex injury that can lead to pain, stiffness, and posttraumatic arthritis if not appropriately treated. The primary goal of surgery for these injuries is to restore stability of the joint sufficient to permit early motion. Although most reports recommend repair and/or replacement of all coronoid and radial head fractures when possible, a recent cadaveric study demonstrated that type II coronoid fractures are stable unless the radial head is removed and not replaced.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were to determine the (1) range of motion; (2) clinical scores using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Broberg-Morrey questionnaires; and (3) rate of arthritic changes, heterotopic ossification (HO), or elbow instability postoperatively in patients whose terrible triad injuries of the elbow included Reagan-Morrey type I or II coronoid fractures that were treated without fixation.

METHODS

Between April 2008 and December 2010, 14 consecutive patients were treated for acute terrible triad injuries that included two Regan-Morrey type I and 12 Regan-Morrey type II coronoid fractures. Based on the senior author's (DGS) clinical experience that coronoid fractures classified as such do not require fixation to restore intraoperative stability to the posterolaterally dislocated elbow, all injuries were treated by the senior author with a surgical protocol that included radial head repair or prosthetic replacement and repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) followed by intraoperative fluoroscopic examination through a range of 20° to 130° of elbow flexion to confirm concentric reduction of the ulnohumeral joint. Using this protocol, intraoperative stability was confirmed in all cases without any attempt at coronoid or anterior capsular repair. Repair of the medial collateral ligament or application of external fixation was not performed in any case. All patients were available for followup at a minimum of 24 months (mean, 41 months; range, 24-56 months). The mean patient age was 52 years (range, 32-58 years). At the followup all patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically by the senior author. Outcome measures included elbow range of motion, forearm rotation, elbow stability, and radiographic evidence of HO or arthritic changes using the Broberg and Morrey scale. Elbow instability was defined as clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrent ulnohumeral dislocation or subluxation at final followup. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the patient-reported DASH questionnaire and the physician-administered Broberg-Morrey elbow rating system.

RESULTS

The mean arc of ulnohumeral motion at final followup was 123° (range, 75°-140°) and mean forearm rotation was 145° (range, 70°-170°). The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 90 of 100 (range, 70-100, higher scores reflecting better results) and the average DASH score was 14 of 100 (range, 0-38, higher scores reflecting poorer results). Radiographs revealed mild arthritic changes in one patient. One patient developed radiographically apparent but asymptomatic HO. None of the patients demonstrated instability postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that terrible triad injuries with type I and II coronoid process fractures can be effectively treated without fixation of coronoid fractures when repair or replacement of the radial head fracture and reconstruction of the LUCL complex sufficiently restores intraoperative stability of the elbow through a functional range of motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reconstruction of the coronoid process using the tip of the ipsilateral olecranon

BACKGROUND

Autograft reconstruction of the coronoid using the tip of the olecranon has been described as a treatment option for comminuted coronoid fractures or coronoid nonunions that are not repairable. The purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study of the coronoid-deficient elbow was to determine whether coronoid reconstruction using the tip of the ipsilateral olecranon would restore elbow kinematics.

METHODS

An elbow motion simulator was used to perform active and passive extension of six cadaveric arms in the horizontal, valgus, varus, and vertical orientations. Elbow kinematics were quantified with use of the screw displacement axis of the ulna with respect to the humerus. Testing was performed with an intact coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, and a coronoid reconstruction using the tip of the ipsilateral olecranon.

RESULTS

Creation of a 40% coronoid deficiency resulted in significant changes (range, 3.6° to 10.9°) in the angular deviations of the screw displacement axis relative to the intact state during simulated active and passive extension in the varus orientation with the forearm in pronation and in supination (p < 0.05). Reconstruction of the coronoid using the ipsilateral olecranon tip restored the angular deviations to those in the intact state (p > 0.05) with the arm in all orientations except valgus, in which there was a small but significant difference (0.4° ± 0.2°, p = 0.04) during passive motion with forearm supination.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of the coronoid using the tip of the ipsilateral olecranon was an effective method for restoring normal kinematics over a range of elbow motion from 20° to 120° in a cadaveric model of an elbow with a 40% coronoid deficiency. This reconstruction technique may prove beneficial for patients with elbow instability due to coronoid deficiency.

Capitellum excision: Mechanical implications and clinical consequences

Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of isolated fractures of the capitellum that are not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation. Excision of the capitellum could result in instability of the elbow, though only limited the clinical or laboratory evidence exists to support this outcome. The aim of our study was to determine if capitellum excision leads to significant instability by measuring the relative change in varus-valgus displacement of the elbow. The varus-valgus displacement was recorded in 11 cadaveric elbows before and after isolated excision of the capitellum. Specimens were testing in varus-loaded and valgus-loaded positions with and without a 1 kg weight on the forearm. The varus-valgus displacement at the elbow was measured using a 3D motion capture system. Capitellum excision did not significantly change varus-valgus displacements in either the adducted, varus, or valgus position of the elbow (p = 0.80, p = 0.28, p = 0.51). Furthermore, the addition of the 1 kg external functional load to the forearm did not produce a significant change in the varus and valgus loaded positions (p = 0.16, p = 0.36). Our results demonstrate that excision of the capitellum in the setting of intact ligamentous structures does not result in significant instability in either the adducted varus loaded or valgus loaded positions of the elbow.

The effect of a coronoid prosthesis on restoring stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

The coronoid process has been recognized as a critical component in maintaining elbow stability. In the case of comminuted coronoid fractures, where repair is not possible or has failed, a prosthesis may be beneficial in restoring the osseous integrity of the elbow joint. The hypothesis of this in vitro biomechanical study was that a coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow.

METHODS

An anatomically shaped metallic coronoid prosthesis was designed and developed based on computed tomography-derived measurements and optimized to account for average cartilage thickness. Elbow kinematics and stability were determined for 8 cadaveric arms in active and passive elbow flexion in the varus, valgus, horizontal, and vertical positions using an elbow motion simulator. Varus-valgus angulation and internal-external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were quantified in the intact state, after collateral ligament sectioning and repair (control state), after a simulated 40% transverse coronoid fracture, and after implantation of the coronoid prosthesis.

RESULTS

Internal rotation of the ulna increased with a 40% coronoid fracture in the horizontal and varus positions. Increases in varus angulation after coronoid fracture were also observed in the horizontal and varus positions, during active and passive flexion, respectively. Following implantation of the coronoid prosthesis, elbow kinematics were restored similar to control levels in all elbow positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support our hypothesis that an anatomically shaped coronoid prosthesis would be effective in restoring stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence that the use of an anatomical implant restores stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow and rationale for further study and development of this method. For comminuted coronoid fractures, where repair is not possible or has failed, our research indicates that a prosthesis may be a feasible treatment option.

Proximal forearm fractures

Unfortunately, the literature has little guidance for revision elbow surgery. This article attempts to supplement what is known in the literature with the author's anecdotal experience. With this article, it is the author's hope that the reader may learn from his or her successes and his or her failures without having to discover them first hand. There is good reason for angst to overcome surgeons looking at radiographs depicting a traumatized proximal ulna or radius. Surgeons know that there is a good chance they will be seeing these patients for a long time.

Terrible triad of the elbow

The terrible triad of the elbow is a difficult injury with historically poor outcomes. Improved experience, techniques, and implants have advanced to the point where restoration of elbow stability can be expected. Careful attention to each destabilizing element of the injury pattern is essential and places high demands on the surgeon's mastery of the anatomic complexity of the elbow. Technically, the surgeon must bring every skill to bear, as soft tissue techniques, fracture repair, and joint arthroplasty are routinely required to adequately treat these complex constellations of injury.

Reconstruction of the coronoid using an extended prosthesis: an in vitro biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to determine whether a coronoid implant with an extended tip would improve elbow stability compared with an anatomic prosthesis in the setting of collateral ligament insufficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Passive elbow extension was performed in 7 cadaveric arms in the varus and valgus positions and active and passive extension in the horizontal position by use of an elbow motion simulator. Varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus was quantified with a tracking system with a native coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, an anatomic prosthesis, and an extended prosthesis, with the collateral ligaments sectioned and repaired.

RESULTS

Laxity significantly increased after a 40% coronoid deficiency with both repaired and sectioned collateral ligaments (P ≤ .01). With the ligaments repaired, there was no significant difference in laxity between the native coronoid, the anatomic implant, or the extended implant. Ligament sectioning alone produced severe instability, with a mean laxity of 42.75° ± 11.54° (P < .01). With insufficient ligaments, the anatomic prosthesis produced no change in laxity compared with the native coronoid, whereas the extended implant significantly reduced laxity by 21.56° ± 17.70° (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

An anatomic coronoid implant with ligament repair restores stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow to intact levels. In the setting of ligament insufficiency, an extended implant improves stability relative to an anatomic implant, but the elbow remains significantly less stable than an intact elbow. Studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of these designs.

An anatomic study of coronoid cartilage thickness with special reference to fractures

BACKGROUND

Current coronoid fracture classification systems are based on fragment size and configuration using plain radiographs and/or computed tomography (CT). During surgery, coronoid fracture fragments appear much larger than anticipated because cartilage is radiolucent and therefore not accounted for with preoperative imaging. The purpose of this imaging study was to quantify the articular cartilage thickness of the coronoid, with reference to coronoid fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four cadaveric ulnae were dissected, imaged with CT, and analyzed by use of image analysis software. Thirteen identifiable landmarks were chosen on the coronoid, olecranon, and proximal radioulnar joint to measure articular cartilage thickness. Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were determined.

RESULTS

Cartilage thickness was highest at the coronoid tip, with a mean of 3.0 mm (range, 1.7-4.6 mm). Cartilage thickness at the tip correlated inversely with age (P < .01) and correlated strongly with overall ulnar height and ulnar length (P < .05). All measurements had excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability.

CONCLUSION

The thickness of cartilage on the coronoid tip is not inconsequential. The results of this study indicate that a 2-mm coronoid tip fracture on CT scan may actually appear to be a mean of 5 mm thick when viewed at the time of surgery. Clinically, this is important because it may alter the classification, the decision to treat, or the type of fixation used. Importantly, biomechanical cadaveric studies assessing coronoid injuries have incorporated cartilage thickness into coronoid size measurements when creating simulated fractures; therefore, it is critical that the conclusions of such biomechanical studies be scrutinized with regard to their clinical recommendations. Surgeons should be aware of these discrepancies.

Fractures of the ulnar coronoid process

The ulnar coronoid process plays a central role in elbow stability due to its unique anatomic characteristics. A fracture of the coronoid, although uncommon, represents a serious injury that can adversely affect functional outcome if not treated appropriately. Several surgical interventions addressing different fracture patterns are being increasingly recognised as effective treatment options even for smaller fragments. A review of the literature was performed in order to evaluate different treatment strategies applied to clearly defined fracture configurations. 14 articles reporting data for the management of 236 coronoid fractures met our inclusion criteria and were subjected to critical analysis. The data suggest that recognition of specific coronoid fracture patterns, use of appropriate classification systems and application of staged surgical protocols can stabilise the elbow effectively and lead to favourable outcomes.

Fixation of the coronoid process in elbow fracture-dislocations

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injuries consist of a posterior dislocation of the elbow, a coronoid fracture, and a radial head fracture. The coronoid plays a pivotal role as an anterior buttress, yet the optimal management of the coronoid fracture remains unknown. We hypothesize that suture lasso fixation of the coronoid fracture leads to fewer complications and improved outcomes compared with screw or suture anchor fixation techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review performed at three tertiary care centers identified forty consecutive patients treated for terrible triad injuries of the elbow with a minimum follow-up of eighteen months (mean, twenty-four months; range, eighteen to fifty-three months). All patients were managed with a standard approach consisting of: (1) repair or replacement of the radial head; (2) repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) of the elbow; and (3) repair of the coronoid fracture with one of two techniques: Group I (n = 28) consisted of the "lasso" technique and Group II (n = 12) consisted of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with screws or suture anchors.

RESULTS

For the study population, the mean postoperative arc of elbow motion was 115° (range, 75° to 140°), the average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 16 (range, 0 to 43), and the average Broberg-Morrey score was 90 (range, 64 to 100). For repair of the coronoid fracture, the suture lasso technique was more stable than the other techniques intraoperatively, both before (p < 0.05) and after (p < 0.05) LUCL repair, and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). ORIF was associated with a higher prevalence of implant failure (p < 0.05), and suture anchors were associated with a higher prevalence of malunion and nonunion (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For terrible triad injuries, greater stability with fewer complications was achieved with use of the suture lasso technique for coronoid fracture fixation.