Risk factors for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Ethical considerations in shoulder arthroplasty in patients who are obese

Obesity and osteoarthritis are two of the most common conditions in the United States and often co-occur. Obese patients with osteoarthritis are at increased risk for complications when undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The ethical consideration relevant to the decision to perform TSA in obese and morbidly obese patients who may benefit from surgery is not well understood. We performed an ethical analysis for patients undergoing TSA who are obese by analyzing the 4 core bioethical principles, beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. To provide the most benefit to patients, counseling patients on weight loss before surgery should be attempted including bariatric surgery or weight loss medication in select patients. To respect the ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, the surgeon must carefully weigh the potential for debilitating progression of disease, pain, and the psychological toll of osteoarthritis against the concern that obese patients may have a higher risk of complications. Respecting patient autonomy requires a rigorous, standardized consent process, which is informed by an understanding of common cognitive biases that affect patient understanding and minimization of perverse incentives that make it more difficult for the surgeon to spend adequate time and resources counseling the patient. Improving incentives for hospitals and physician alike to treat patients with obesity and other comorbidities will provide most just care while minimizing long-term harmful effects to the patient, surgeon, and health-care system.

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multivariate Analysis Study

Background/Objectives: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been widely used for the treatment of shoulder pathologies, particularly rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Currently, it is also increasingly performed for different indications. Like in any arthroplasty procedure, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most concerning complications and may have devastating outcomes. This study aimed to identify risk factors for PJI following RSA. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted with patients who underwent RSA during the study period. Based on PJI occurrence during the follow-up period, patients were divided into two groups: Group I (no infection) and Group II (infection). The relationship between numerous clinical variables and PJI was tested. All variables were initially evaluated through univariate analysis between the two groups, and variables showing significant differences between the two study groups were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine independent risk factors. Results: The study included 302 patients, with a mean age of 69.6 ± 10.1 years and a mean follow-up duration of 59.8 ± 24.7 months. During the follow-up period, PJI was not detected in 289 patients (95.7%) (Group I), while 13 patients (4.3%) developed PJI (Group II). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) value (p = 0.001) and preoperative diabetes history (p = 0.007) with PJI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, including these two variables, showed that diabetes was an independent risk factor for PJI development (p = 0.01, odds ratio = 4.85). Preoperative CRP elevation was not observed as an independent risk factor. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a significant association between high preoperative CRP levels and diabetes with PJI. Additionally, the presence of diabetes was identified as an independent risk factor for infection, with a 4.85-fold higher risk of PJI development in patients with a history of diabetes.

Stemless anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an analysis of the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry at 5 years

BACKGROUND

Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in young patients poses challenging treatment decisions. Arthroplasty options have different failure profiles and implant survivorship patterns. This registry study aims to analyze the cumulative per cent revision (CPR) rate of different types of arthroplasties conducted for primary osteoarthritis in patients below 55 years of age.

METHODS

This comparative observational national registry study included all shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients below 55 years of age undertaken between January 1st, 2005, and December 31st, 2022. Partial hemi resurfacing and hemi stemless procedures were excluded. The CPR was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for gender. Reasons for revision of each type of arthroplasty and cumulative incidence of revision diagnoses were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two thousand one-hundred eleven primary shoulder arthroplasties were compared. Glenoid erosion is the predominant cause of revision for humeral resurfacing (29.8%) and hemiarthroplasty (35.5%). Instability is the predominant cause of revision for stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), while loosening is the predominant cause of revision for stemless aTSA. The 6-year CPR is 12.8% for humeral resurfacing, 14.1% for hemiarthroplasty, 12.4% for stemmed (aTSA), 7.0% for stemless aTSA, and 6.5% for rTSA. Stemmed aTSA had a higher revision rate than rTSA (entire period HR = 2.04 (95% confidence interval 1.16, 3.57), P = .012). In contrast, the revision rate of stemless aTSA was not different from rTSA (HR = 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.51, 2.19), P = .889). Males outnumber females for all shoulder arthroplasty categories.

DISCUSSION

rTSA and stemless aTSA are viable options in young patients with primary osteoarthritis. Their short-to-medium term revision rates are comparable to those of older patients and lower than those associated with humeral resurfacing, hemiarthroplasty, and stemmed aTSA.

CONCLUSION

In the predominantly male patient population below the age of 55, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and stemless aTSA have a lower short-term revision risk than stemmed aTSA.

Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Shoulder

Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after shoulder arthroplasty is often treated with a two-stage approach, but the data on the mid- to long-term outcomes remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty for shoulder PJI with a minimum follow-up of five years. Methods: This retrospective study identified 59 shoulders in 58 patients who underwent the first stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty for shoulder PJI at our institution between 2007 and 2018. Of these, 29 shoulders in 29 patients (49.2%) did not undergo reimplantation or the patient passed away before reaching five years of follow-up. The remaining 30 shoulders in 29 patients were included in the study. The clinical assessments included the active range of motion, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), the Constant Score (CS), and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12), supplemented by detailed clinical and radiological evaluations. Results: The mean age of the 29 patients was 75.9 ± 10.4 years. The average follow-up duration was 8.3 ± 2.8 years. The most common indications for primary shoulder arthroplasty were primary osteoarthritis (n = 12, 40%) and fractures (n = 12, 40%). At the first stage, nine cases (30%) showed negative cultures, while C. acnes and S. epidermidis were each identified in eight cases (26.7%). Four shoulders (13.3%) experienced recurrent infections. At the follow-up, the mean abduction was 86 ± 48.1°, the mean forward flexion was 97.8 ± 50.1°, the mean external rotation was 20.5 ± 19.9°, and the internal rotation reached the lumbosacral region. The mean VAS pain score was 1.5 ± 2.1, the mean SSV was 51.8 ± 28.4%, the mean CS was 54.6 ± 21.0, and the mean SF-12 was 81.0 ± 16.0. Conclusions: Two-stage revision arthroplasty for shoulder PJI results in satisfactory subjective and objective outcomes, with a low overall reinfection rate. However, the high rates of mortality and failure to reimplant must be carefully considered when managing expectations in this challenging cohort.

Perioperative Management, Complications, and Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

» Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have a unique risk profile, which must be considered by clinicians.» The presence of DM as a comorbidity is associated with longer length of stay following SA, greater likelihood of nonhome discharge, and a higher rate of 90-day readmission.» Though the incidence is low, patients with DM are at an increased risk of serious postoperative cardiovascular complications, such as pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, and myocardial infarction.» DM has generally been associated with increased risk of postoperative infection. The optimal hemoglobin A1c threshold in patients undergoing SA remains inconclusive. When extrapolating from lower limb arthroplasty, the literature indicates that this threshold is most likely in the range of 7.5% to 8%.» Patients with DM are more likely to require revision surgery after SA and report lower postoperative satisfaction.

Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Principles of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment

➢ Shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a potentially devastating complication after arthroplasty and is projected to rise with increasing numbers of performed arthroplasties, particularly reverse shoulder arthroplasties.➢ Important considerations for the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder PJI include age, sex, implant type, primary compared with revision shoulder surgery, comorbidities, and medications (i.e., corticosteroids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs). ➢ Diagnosis and management are unique compared with lower-extremity PJI due to the role of lower-virulence organisms in shoulder PJI, specifically Cutibacterium acnes.➢ Treatment pathways depend on chronicity of infection, culture data, and implant type, and exist on a spectrum from irrigation and debridement to multistage revision with temporary antibiotic spacer placement followed by definitive revision arthroplasty.

Preoperative corticosteroid injections are associated with a higher periprosthetic infection rate following primary total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used for the treatment of shoulder pain in patients with osteoarthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy. These injections may increase the risk of infection following eventual shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing data to explore the relationship between preoperative CSI's and postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through September 29, 2023. Of the 4221 retrieved, 7 studies including 136,233 patients were included for qualitative analysis. Studies describing patients receiving CSI prior to shoulder arthroplasty and the effect on postoperative infection risk were included in the systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

Receiving a CSI prior to shoulder arthroplasty was found to have a statistically significant association with increased risk for PJI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.19; P < .0001). The rate of PJI increased when injections were given closer to the time of surgery. Patients who received an injection at any time point before surgery had a 5.4% risk of PJI compared to 7.9% and 9.0% in patients receiving an injection within 3 months and 1 month of surgery, respectively. This time dependent association however did not reach statistical significance: 1 month OR 1.48; 95% Cl: 0.86-2.53; P = .16, 3 months OR 1.95; 95% Cl: 0.95-4.00; P = .07.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that patients receiving corticosteroid shoulder injections prior to shoulder arthroplasty may be at an increased risk for PJI postoperatively. While time dependent stratification did not reach statistical significance, our findings indicate a clear trend of increased risk for patients receiving injections closer to surgery.

Can ChatGPT answer patient questions regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has seen substantial progress in its utilization, with Chat Generated Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is emerging as a popular language model. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT's responses to frequently asked questions (FAQ) pertaining to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

METHODS

The ten most common FAQs were queried from institution patient education websites. These ten questions were then input into the chatbot during a single session without additional contextual information. The responses were then critically analyzed by two orthopedic surgeons for clarity, accuracy, and the quality of evidence-based information using The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria and the DISCERN score. The readability of the responses was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level.

RESULTS

In response to the ten questions, the average DISCERN score was 44 (range 38-51). Seven responses were classified as fair and three were poor. The JAMA Benchmark criteria score was 0 for all responses. Furthermore, the average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 14.35, which correlates to a college graduate reading level.

CONCLUSION

Overall, ChatGPT was able to provide fair responses to common patient questions. However, the responses were all written at a college graduate reading level and lacked reliable citations. The readability greatly limits its utility. Thus, adequate patient education should be done by orthopedic surgeons. This study underscores the need for patient education resources that are reliable, accessible, and comprehensible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes following revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for infection

BACKGROUND

In comparison to primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures, revision arthroplasty can be a longer and more complex procedure leading to an increased risk of complications. The reported rates of infection in primary RSA range from 1% to 19% and the cost impact on patients and health care systems is significant, leading to multiple revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes, complications, and revision rates for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rRSA) due to infection compared with rRSA for noninfectious causes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent rRSA between 2009 and 2020 by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on revision diagnosis: (1) rRSA due to infection (rRSAi) and (2) rRSA due to noninfectious causes (rRSAn). Patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), including the Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score, and active range of motion (ROM) were collected preoperatively and at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Postoperative complications and revision rates were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients (n = 19 rRSAi group, n = 74 rRSAn group) with a mean age of 68 years were included in this analysis. All baseline demographics were comparable between groups. No significant differences were found in preoperative or postoperative PROs and ROM between the 2 groups. Postoperative complication rates and revision rates were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

RSA due to infection results in similar patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and revision rates when compared to rRSA for noninfectious causes. Our results suggest that despite the unique challenges associated with rRSA for infection, patient outcomes do not differ from cases attributed to noninfectious causes. More efforts are warranted to further validate and contextualize these findings, considering the protentional influence of patient-specific and implant-specific factors.

Does morbid obesity negatively impact perioperative outcomes following elective reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: a propensity-matched comparative study

Background

The incidence of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and the prevalence of obesity have increased in the United States. Despite this, the literature assessing the effect of morbid obesity (body mass index≥40 kg/m2) on perioperative surgical outcomes remains inconsistent.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive elective primary rTSA cases from January 2016 through September 2023 at a single tertiary referral center was performed. All cases involved a short-stem humeral component and screw-in glenoid baseplate from the same implant manufacturer. Surgical and patient demographic data were collected. Morbidly obese patients were propensity matched at least 1:1 with non-morbidly obese patients based on age, gender, modified 5-item frailty index score, adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score, and 12-month preoperative emergency department (ED) visit. Regression analysis was utilized to assess the relationship between morbid obesity and operative time, length of stay, intraoperative total blood volume loss, surgical postoperative complications, in-hospital medical complications, disposition, and 90-day ED return and readmission.

Results

There were a total of 175 short-stem rTSA cases performed with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range: 66, 76), of which 19 (10.9%) had a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. These 19 patients were propensity score matched to 41 non-morbidly obese patients (9 at 1:3, 4 at 1:2, and 6 at 1:1). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to intraoperative total blood volume loss, operative time, need for transfusion, hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, prevalence for 90-day return to ED, or unplanned 90-day readmission.

Conclusion

Morbid obesity should not be considered an absolute contraindication for elective rTSA, particularly in patients who have undergone appropriate preoperative medical clearance.

Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a commonly performed procedure to treat degenerative conditions of the shoulder. With its growing utilization, techniques to reliably diagnose and treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have become increasingly important. In this review we outline the current research and prevention methods of prosthetic joint infection in rTSA. This includes preoperative considerations, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment algorithms.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is currently no established standardized protocol for preoperative infection prevention or post operative management. However, recent studies have identified risk factors for infection, as well as successful prevention techniques that can be implemented to minimize infection risk. Although there is no standardized protocol currently utilized to diagnose and treat shoulder PJI, we outline a potential set of preventative measures and postoperative management strategies that clinicians can use to properly diagnose and treat patients with this difficult condition.

Complications and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty are similar between patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Purpose

There is wide variability in the conclusions of studies examining the effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty (SA). The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in complication profiles between patients with DM and those without undergoing anatomic and reverse total SA.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing SA in a single center from January 2014 to December 2019 was performed. Patients were then stratified into two cohorts, patients with controlled DM (mean hemoglobin A1C < 7%) and those without. Outcomes analyzed included intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and revision surgery rates. Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days were also recorded.

Results

A total of 595 patients underwent SA. No significant difference was found between the diabetes (n = 151) and control group (n = 444) with regard to length of stay (P = .168), complications (P = .286), infection rate (P = .977), 30-day ED visits (P = .789), and readmissions (P = .230). The average time to revision was 26.8 months in the diabetes group and 26.6 months in the control group (P = .989).

Conclusions

Following SA patients with controlled DM showed no increased risk of postoperative infection, ED visitation,hospital readmission, and revision surgery rate when compared to non-diabetics.

Level of evidence

Level III-retrospective cohort.

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with higher 90-day systemic complications compared to osteoarthritis after total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can present unique challenges. The aim of this study was to compare both systemic and joint-related postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary TSA with RA versus those with primary osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Using the TriNetX database, Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify patients who underwent primary TSA. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: RA and OA. After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative systemic complications within 90 days following primary TSA and joint-related complications within 5 years following anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were compared.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the RA and OA cohorts each consisted of 8,523 patients. Within 90 days postoperation, RA patients had a significantly higher risk of total complications, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, mortality, and readmission compared to the OA cohort. RA patients had a significantly greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection and prosthetic dislocation within 5 years following aTSA and RSA, and a greater risk of scapular fractures following RSA. Among RA patients, RSA had a significantly higher risk of prosthetic dislocation, scapular fractures, and revision compared to aTSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Following TSA, RA patients should be considered at higher risk of systemic and joint-related complications compared to patients with primary OA. Knowledge of the risk profile of RA patients undergoing TSA is essential for appropriate patient counseling and education. Level of evidence: III.

Is the impact of previous rotator cuff repair on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty clinically relevant? A systematic review of 2879 shoulders

Background

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with prior rotator cuff repair (RCR) remain inconsistent. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to systematically review the current outcomes literature on RSA in patients with prior RCR and to compare the results with controls without prior RCR.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed, and outcome studies reporting on functional and clinical outcomes were included.

Results

A total of 11 studies encompassing 2879 shoulders were included. Improvements in postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the baseline were higher in controls including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (47.0 vs 39.5), Simple Shoulder Test (6.0 vs 4.9), Constant score (32.6 vs 26.4), and Visual Analog Scale for pain (-5.6 vs -4.9). Improvement in range of motion was greater in the control group, including external rotation (17° vs 11°), anterior elevation (56° vs 43°), and abduction (52° vs 43°). The overall complication rate (8% vs 5%) and revision rate (3% vs 1%) were higher in the RCR group.

Discussion

Differences in postoperative PROs and improvement from the baseline demonstrate a trend toward lower outcomes in patients with prior RCR but may be below the minimal clinically import difference.

Level of evidence

IV; systematic review.

Predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has increased at a greater rate than other shoulder procedures. In general, clinical and functional outcomes after RTSA have been favorable regardless of indication. However, little evidence exists regarding patient specific factors associated with clinical improvement after RTSA. Predicting postoperative outcomes after RTSA may support patients and physicians to establish more accurate patient expectations and contribute in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA for patients with degenerative shoulder disorders.

METHODS

EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro were searched to identify cohort studies reporting on predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA. Authors independently screened publications on eligibility. Risk of bias for each publication was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A qualitative description of the results was given. The GRADE framework was used to establish the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 1986 references were found of which 11 relevant articles were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed as low (N = 7, 63.6%) or moderate (N = 4, 36.4%). According to the evidence synthesis there was moderate-quality evidence indicating that greater height predicts better postoperative shoulder function, and greater preoperative range of motion (ROM) predicts increased postoperative ROM following.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative predictive factors that may predict postoperative outcomes are: patient height and preoperative range of motion. These factors should be considered in the preoperative decision making for a RTSA, and can potentially be used to aid in preoperative decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I; Systematic review.

Imaging in shoulder arthroplasty: Current applications and future perspectives

Shoulder arthroplasty has become a standard surgical procedure for treating a variety of complex shoulder disorders, including those with degenerative and traumatic aetiologies. The ever-improving success rates of shoulder arthroplasty could be attributed to advancements in endoprosthesis design, improvements in the biomechanics of endoprosthetic components, and improvements in surgical techniques. It improves patient outcomes and helps restore shoulder joint function and mobility. Imaging plays a vital role by enabling surgeons to plan arthroplasty procedures, help guide endoprosthesis placement, and monitor postoperative outcomes. In addition, imaging plays a role in assessing the residual bone stock and status of rotator cuff integrity and in correcting the placement of prosthetic components to restore shoulder mobility. CT-guided navigation aids surgeons by helping them choose appropriate components for implants and ensuring that implants are placed optimally during surgery. It can lead to better surgical results with reduced patient morbidity and a longer duration of prosthetic stability. After surgery, it is crucial to use imaging techniques to detect issues such as periprosthetic loosening, infections, or fractures to start effective management strategies to enhance patient recovery. This article aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists with knowledge on the imaging methods used in shoulder arthroplasty and their role in presurgical planning, intraoperative guidance and postoperative assessment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the rationale behind utilising various types of shoulder replacements: total shoulder replacement (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and hemiarthroplasty; methods, their respective advantages and limitations; and outcomes. Our objective is to comprehensively analyse the procedures mentioned above and highlight their unique features and benefits to facilitate a better understanding of these approaches. Additionally, we will discuss how these imaging techniques help identify issues such as loose components, fractures around the implant site, joint instability and infections.

One- vs. Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty. Therapeutic options include one- or two-stage revision, irrigation and debridement, and resection arthroplasty. With our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare one- and two-stage revisions for periprosthetic shoulder joint infections and determine the most appropriate therapeutic procedure. We performed an extensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL and filtered out all relevant studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model, heterogeneity was analyzed using I2, and publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. A total of 8 studies with one-stage revisions, 36 studies with two-stage revisions, and 12 studies with both one-stage and two-stage revisions were included. According to the random-effects model, the reinfection rate for the entirety of the studies was 12.3% (95% Cl: 9.6-15.3), with a low-to-moderate heterogeneity of I2 = 47.72%. The reinfection rate of the one-stage revisions was 10.9%, which was significantly lower than the reinfection rate of the two-stage revisions, which was 12.93% (p = 0.0062). The one-stage revision rate was significantly lower with 1.16 vs. 2.25 revisions in the two-stage revision group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative functional outcome in one-stage-revised patients was comparable but not statistically significant (p = 0.1523). In one- and two-stage revisions, most infections were caused by Cutibacterium acnes. In summary, our systematic review and meta-analysis show the superiority of single-stage revision regarding reinfection and revision rates in periprosthetic shoulder joint infection.

Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty usually have excellent long-term outcomes. However, a subset of patients is diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring revision procedures and prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder PJI in patients undergoing débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. We also sought to compare outcomes and complications across procedures.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with PJI after primary shoulder arthroplasty between January 2010 and August 2021. Patients were included if they underwent treatment with DAIR, single-stage revision, or 2-stage revision. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, laboratory data, postoperative antibiotic regimen, and infectious pathogen were collected. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Scale, and PROMIS Upper Extremity. Chi-square, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate each factor.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the study, 26% treated with DAIR, 9% treated with single-stage revision, and 65% treated with 2-stage revision. There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities. Patients undergoing DAIR were diagnosed significantly earlier than those undergoing single- and 2-stage revision procedures (12.6 ± 22.9 months vs. 49.6 ± 48.4 vs. 25.0 ± 26.6, P = .010). Recurrent PJI was noted in 23.1% of patients: 29.4% of DAIR patients, no single-stage patients, and 23.8% of 2-stage patients (P = .330). Patients undergoing 2-stage revision with treatment failure had a significantly higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.9, P = .027). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes across groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing treatment of shoulder PJI with DAIR did not have an increased rate of reinfection compared with single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. Patients treated with DAIR were diagnosed with PJI significantly earlier than those undergoing single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between groups. This information adds to the body of work detailing outcomes after DAIR for shoulder PJI and provides encouraging data for use in this patient population. Future studies with a larger sample size may be conducted to further investigate specific pathogens, infection timelines, and antibiotic regimens that reduce the risk of treatment failure.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

Infected Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 60 Years: Results of a Multicenter Study

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after shoulder arthroplasty remains a significant complication. This study aimed to explore the epidemiology and risk factors of shoulder PJI in patients aged 60 and younger, analyze treatment options, and evaluate outcomes after 1-year follow-up. Methods: In this retrospective multicentric observational study, data from 1404 shoulders in patients under 60 who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty were analyzed. Patients with PJI and at least 1-year follow-up after infection treatment were included. Results: The study identified 55 shoulders with PJI, resulting in a 2.35% infection rate after primary shoulder arthroplasty in the young population. Male gender and reverse shoulder arthroplasty were risk factors for infection, while previous surgeries did not significantly contribute. The most common causative agents were Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Open washout had a 52.9% success rate for acute infections, while one-stage and two-stage revisions achieved infection control rates of 91.3% and 85.7%, respectively. Resection arthroplasty had an 81.8% success rate but poorer functional outcomes. Conclusions: PJI following shoulder arthroplasty in young patients is a significant concern. Preoperative planning should be carefully considered to minimize infection risk. Treatment options such as open washout and one-stage and two-stage revisions offer effective infection control and improved functional outcomes. Resection arthroplasty should be reserved for complex cases where reimplantation is not a viable option.

Smoking cessation prior to total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review of outcomes and complications

Background

We conducted a review of current literature to examine the effects of smoking and smoking cessation on shoulder arthroplasty surgery.

Methods

A literature search was performed using the search terms "shoulder arthroplasty AND [smoke OR smoking OR tobacco OR nicotine]." Studies included English-language clinical outcomes studies on anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse TSA, and partial shoulder arthroplasty with evidence levels 1 through 4. Descriptive statistics calculated in the included studies were used during the analysis. Categorical variables were reported as proportions, while continuous variables were reported as means with minimum to maximum absolute ranges.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included and analyzed. Following TSA, patients who quit smoking at least 1 month preoperatively had improved outcomes compared to current smokers. Current smokers had statistically significant higher pain scores or opioid use. Five studies found increased rates of revision surgery in smokers. Smokers were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to have increased rates of surgical, wound, superficial, and deep surgical site complications.

Discussion

Former smokers had lower complication rates and visual analog scale scores when compared to current users. A period of four weeks or more of preoperative smoking cessation is recommended.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Systematic Review.

Preventing and Treating Infection in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty is relatively uncommon though associated with severe long-term morbidity when encountered. The purpose of the review is to summarize the recent literature regarding the definition, clinical evaluation, prevention, and management of prosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

The landmark report generated at the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection has provided a framework for diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder specific literature with validated interventions to reduce prosthetic joint infection is limited; however existing literature from retrospective studies and from total hip and knee arthroplasty allows us to make relative guidelines. One and two-stage revisions seem to demonstrate similar outcomes; however, no controlled comparative studies exist limiting the ability to make definitive recommendations between the two options. We report on recent literature regarding the current diagnostic, preventative, and treatment options for periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and further high-level shoulder specific studies are needed to answer questions generated from this review.

How common is nerve injury after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Nerve injury following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a known risk factor with wide ranging incidences reported. This systematic review evaluates the overall incidence of nerve injury following primary and revision RSA and summarizes the characteristics of the nerve injuries reported in the current literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using separate database searches (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane) following the PRISMA guidelines. Search criteria included the title terms "reverse shoulder," "reverse total shoulder," "inverted shoulder," and "inverted total shoulder" with publication dates ranging from 01/01/2010 to 01/01/2022. Studies that reported neurological injuries and complications were included and evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, number of nerve injuries, and which nerves were affected.

RESULTS

After exclusion, our systematic review consisted of 188 articles. A total of 40,146 patients were included, with 65% female. The weighted mean age was 70.3 years. The weighted mean follow-up was 35.4 months. The rate of nerve injury after RSA was 1.3% (510 of 40,146 RSAs). The rate of injury was greater in revision RSA compared to primary RSA (2.4% vs. 1.3%). Nerve injury was most common in RSAs done for a primary diagnosis of acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%), followed by cuff tear arthropathy (3.0%), DJD (2.6%), and inflammatory arthritis (1.7%). Massive rotator cuff tears and post-traumatic arthritis cases had the lowest nerve injury rates (1.0% and 1.4%, respectively). The axillary nerve was the most commonly reported nerve that was injured in both primary and revision RSA (0.6%), followed by the ulnar nerve (0.26%) and median nerve (0.23%). Brachial plexus injury was reported in 0.19% of overall RSA cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on current English literature, nerve injuries occur at a rate of 1.3% after primary RSA compared with 2.4% after revision RSA. The most common nerve injury was to the axillary nerve (0.64%), with the most common operative diagnosis associated with nerve injury after RSA being acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%). Surgeons should carefully counsel patients prior to surgery regarding the risk of nerve injury.

The safety and efficiency of benzoyl peroxide for reducing Cutibacterium acnes in the shoulder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), a common pathogen, contributes significantly to infections in shoulder surgery. Prevention of shoulder infection is crucial to improve postoperative functional recovery and reduce costs. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of 5% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) application in the shoulder to decrease C. acnes.

Methods

Three electronic databases were searched as follows: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Data extraction for this study was performed by two independent reviewers, and only level I and level II studies were included. The outcome data sources of individual studies were pooled. The fixed-effect model was used to determine the meta-analysis.

Results

There were five level I studies and five level II studies. The results showed that the 5% BPO group had a lower risk of C. acnes positivity [OR, 0.21 (0.15, 0.30), I2 = 24, p &lt; 0.00001]. The pooled analysis results showed that there was no significant difference in the ability of 5% BPO and 5% BPO + clindamycin to reduce C. acnes. However, the lower rate of adverse events was significantly in favour of the non-BPO group compared with the 5% BPO group.

Conclusion

BPO can decrease C. acnes in the shoulder to prevent infection. However, the combination of BPO and clindamycin does not enhance this effect further.

Level of evidence

II, Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prosthetic joint infections of the shoulder: A review of the recent literature

Introduction

Shoulder arthroplasty is a common treatment for shoulder arthritis. Prosthetic joint infection of the shoulder (PJIS) is a debilitating complication to the patient and the healthcare system. Incidence of infection is 0.98-5% for primary arthroplasty. The mean hospital cost for two-stage revision was approximately $35,824. The aim of this paper is to review the recent literature and collate the latest evidence to aid diagnosis and treatment of this serious complication.

Methods

A literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. A search strategy was adopted using the keywords: 'infection' AND 'shoulder arthroplasty' OR 'total shoulder arthroplasty'OR 'TSA' OR 'reverse shoulder arthroplasty' OR 'RSA' OR 'rTSA'. This initial search resulted in 349 articles. A PRISMA flowchart process was followed. Duplicates were removed, screening was performed and the resulting full texts were analysed and further excluded, leaving 46 articles suitable for inclusion. A PICO search strategy was also used.

Results and interpretation

Risk factors for PJIS include procedure type, trauma indications and patient factors.The organism commonly isolated is Cutebacterium acnes, which makes diagnosis challenging due to its indolent nature. Investigations include biochemical tests, synovial aspirate, tissue cultures and radiological examinations.Treatment depends on the depth of the infection and the patient requirements. Medical treatment with antibiotics to local debridement, cement spacer and revision arthroplasty have all been described in the literature. A multidisciplinary decision is made on the microbiological evidence and patient factors.

Conclusion

PJIS is a rare but potentially devastating complication of shoulder arthroplasty and diagnosis is often challenging. There has been much research performed recently, providing more evidence on how to optimise management.

Risk factors for the development of a peri-prosthetic joint infection up to 2 Years following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become commonly used to treat glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), of which complications such as peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) may develop. The objective of this study was to compare patient demographics of those who did and did not develop PJIs within 2 years after primary RSA for GHOA and identify risk factors for this sequela.

Methods

A nationwide database was queried from 2005 to 2014 for Medicare patients treated with primary RSA (International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) procedural code 81.88) for GHOA. Patients who developed PJIs within 2-years of primary RSA defined the study group, whereas those who were devoid of infections represented the comparison group. Our study consisted of 51,824 patients, of which 879 (1.69%) developed a PJI. Patient demographics comprising the Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) were compared using Chi-Square analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute the odds-ratios (OR) of patient-specific factors associated with acquiring a PJI within 2 years after RSA. P values less than 0.002 were significant.

Results

Patients developing a PJI had higher mean ECI (8 vs. 6; p < 0.0001). The greatest risk factors for developing PJIs within 2-years following RSA were male sex (OR: 2.10, 95%CI: 1.81-2.43, p < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.45-2.17, p < 0.0001), iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p < 0.0001), morbid obesity (OR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.21-1.88, p = 0.0001), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.13-1.54, p = 0.0003), arrhythmias (OR: 1.26, 95%CI 1.09-1.46, p = 0.001), and depressive disorders (OR: 1.23, 95%CI 1.06-1.43, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The greatest risk factors for PJIs within 2 years of primary RSA included male sex; additional modifiable risk factors included iron deficiency anemia, pathologic weight loss, and obesity. Preoperative screening can help to identify modifiable risk factors and alter management for high-risk patients to potentially minimize PJIs.

Obesity does not associate with 5-year surgical complications following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although obesity has been shown to increase the risk of short-term medical complications following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), evidence is lacking on the influence of obesity on longer-term surgical complications such as revision. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of increasing obesity with 2- and 5-year all-cause revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic loosening, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) among patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) or TSA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RTSA or TSA with a minimum 5-year follow-up were identified in a national claims database (PearlDiver Technologies). Patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) were compared to patients who are normal or overweight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 30). Those with obesity were further stratified to those with class I or II obesity (30 ≤ BMI < 40) and those with class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40). Outcomes for comparison included all-cause revision, PJI, aseptic loosening, and MUA within 2 or 5 years. These cohorts were compared using univariate and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with obesity had no significant difference in any surgical complication within 2 or 5 years for both those who underwent TSA or RTSA. After stratifying by class I or II obesity and class III obesity, there was still no significant difference in surgical complications with 2 or 5 years for both TSA patients and RTSA patients.

DISCUSSION

Obesity, when other major comorbidities are controlled for, was not associated with increased risk of long-term surgical complications after shoulder replacement surgery.

Antibiotic Spacers for Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review

Periprosthetic joint infection is a rare but potentially devastating complication of shoulder arthroplasty. The most conservative treatment approach is a two-stage revision involving interval placement of an antibiotic cement spacer. The purpose of this study was to contextualize the use of antibiotic spacers in the current treatment paradigm of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection and to review the history of shoulder spacers, the different types (eg, stemmed versus stemless and prefabricated versus handmade), the antibiotic composition and dosage, and their efficacy and complications.

Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Shoulder Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating complication that requires several additional surgeries. The purpose of this study was to assess the evidence regarding risk factors for PJI and identify those that contribute to infection by performing a meta-analysis. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that assessed the risk factors for infection after shoulder arthroplasty. After performing screening and quality assessment on the articles, we obtained two case-control studies and six retrospective cohort studies (total of 420 infected cases and 28,464 controls). Review Manager 5.4 was used to assess the heterogeneity and odds ratio for 20 different factors that broadly included demographic factors, perioperative factors, and comorbidities. Factors that are markedly associated with PJI after shoulder arthroplasty were male sex, operation history, revision arthroplasty, acute trauma, and non-osteoarthritis as a preoperative diagnosis. Statistical analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus, liver disease, alcohol overuse, iron-deficiency anemia, and rheumatoid arthritis were risk factors for PJI after shoulder arthroplasty. The result of analysis shows that several specific factors can be targeted to prevent infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Surgeons should consider the risk factors and perform the appropriate management for patients.

Obesity and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rates of obesity and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in the USA have both escalated with time. Obese patients experience arthritis at higher rates than normal weight patients; therefore, these numbers go hand in hand. Obesity has been correlated with health comorbidities such as anxiety, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome as well as poorer outcomes and higher complication rates following lower extremity arthroplasty. The current review investigates these comorbidities as they relate to obese patients undergoing rTSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Functional outcomes are similar to normal weight counterparts. Although longer operative times and a large soft tissue envelope would intuitively predispose these patients to higher risk for infection or other complications, this has not been reliably demonstrated. Technical considerations and awareness of potential risks in the obese patient demographic may aid the surgeon in preoperative planning and counseling of their patient. Obese patients undergoing rTSA have been shown to have higher risks specifically for infection, revision, and medical complications; however, this has not been consistently demonstrated in the single surgeon series where, more often, no difference in these metrics has been found. Outcomes measures and satisfaction are reliably improved, even when considering superobese patients, and majority of studies find their improvements and absolute values to be in line with their normal weight counterparts. Thus, rTSA does not seem to carry the same level of adverse risk associated with lower joint arthroplasty but potential for higher risk still bears consideration when counseling obese patients. Attention to factors that may negatively affect prosthesis positioning may optimize retention rates and limit early failure.

Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection and All-Cause Mortality: A Worrisome Association

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be a devastating complication following shoulder arthroplasty. PJI following hip and knee arthroplasties has been found to increase mortality. However, anatomical and bacteriologic differences could potentially result in a different trend after shoulder arthroplasties. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether there is an association between shoulder PJI and all-cause mortality.

Methods

Our institutional Total Joint Registry Database was queried to identify patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures between 2000 and 2018. A total of 1,160 procedures were then classified as either septic (21.8%) or aseptic (78.2%). Septic revisions were further subdivided into (1) debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention (9.1%); (2) 2-stage reimplantation for deep infection (61.3%); (3) implant resection without reimplantation (3.6%); and (4) unexpected positive cultures at revision surgery (26.1%). The most common bacterium isolated was Cutibacterium acnes (64.4%). All-cause patient mortality was determined with use of our registry and confirmed with use of a nationwide mortality database. All-cause crude and adjusted mortality rates were then compared between groups.

Results

The 1-year crude mortality rate was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9% to 2.6%) for the aseptic group and 2.8% (95% CI, 0.7% to 4.8%) for the septic group (p = 0.31). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated an elevated but statistically similar adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year all-cause mortality of 1.9 (95% CI, 0.8 to 4.6) when comparing the septic to the aseptic group (p = 0.17). The risk of 2-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the septic group, with a hazard ratio of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5; p = 0.029). In univariate analyses, increased 5-year mortality in the septic revision group was associated with age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, whereas C. acnes infection was associated with lower mortality.

Conclusions

Shoulder PJI is associated with an adjusted 2-year all-cause mortality rate that is double that of aseptic patients. The results of the present study should be utilized to appropriately counsel patients who are considered to be at risk for infection following shoulder arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Limited value of current shoulder arthroplasty registries in evidence-based shoulder surgery: a review of 7 national registries

National shoulder arthroplasty registries are currently used to assess incidence, indication, type of prosthesis and revision, but they seem to lack sufficient information to lead to evidence based decision-making in shoulder surgery. There appears to be a large difference in registered parameters and outcome measurement per country. First we investigated whether existing registries have sufficient common datasets to enable pooling of data. Second, we determined whether known risk factors for prosthetic failure are being recorded. Through a non-systematic literature review studies on registries were analyzed for included parameters. Seven national registries were scrutinized for the data collected and these were classified according to categories of risk factors for failure: patient-, implant and surgeon related, and other parameters. This shows a large heterogeneity of registered parameters between countries. The majority of parameters shown to be relevant to outcome and failure of shoulder prostheses are not included in the studied registries. International agreement on parameters and outcome measurement for registries is paramount to enable pooling and comparison of data. If we intend to use the registries to provide us with evidence to improve prosthetic shoulder surgery, we need adjustment of the different parameters to be included.

Early aseptic reoperation after shoulder arthroplasty increases risk of subsequent prosthetic joint infection

Background

Despite the success of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the clinical course of some patients necessitates operative intervention in the acute postoperative period. In this study, we evaluate the risk of subsequent prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who undergo an aseptic reoperation within 90 days of primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Method

A retrospective review of patients with primary TSA and RSA was performed using a commercially available national database (PearlDiver Inc., Fort Wayne, IN, USA). Queries were performed with use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision and Current Procedural Technology codes. Patients were divided into cohorts based on undergoing aseptic reoperation, reoperation for PJI, or no reoperations within 90 days of index procedure. Primary outcome was subsequent PJI within 1 year of index procedure. Observed PJI rates were compared using chi-square analysis. Risk factors for PJI were compared using logistic regression.

Results

From 2010 to 2018, a total of 96,648 patients underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty: 46,810 underwent TSA and 49,838 underwent RSA. The rate of aseptic reoperation within 90 days was 0.72% and 1.5% in the TSA and RSA cohorts, respectively. At 1 year postoperatively, patients who underwent an aseptic reoperation within 90 days had an elevated risk of subsequent PJI compared with the overall rate of PJI in the TSA (3.54% vs. 0.75%; P < .001) and RSA (3.08% vs. 0.73%; P < .001) cohorts. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, aseptic reoperation within 90 days was identified as a significant risk factor for subsequent PJI in the TSA cohort (odds ratio, 14.19; P < .001) and RSA cohort (odds ratio, 8.38; P < .001). The most common indication for aseptic reoperation was postoperative prosthetic joint instability in both the TSA (31%) and RSA (49%) cohorts.

Conclusion

Aseptic reoperation within 90 days of primary TSA or primary RSA was associated with a notably increased risk of subsequent PJI.

Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II

Early reported complication rates with the Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were very high, up to 24%.A 'problem' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is not likely to affect the patient's final outcome, such as intraoperative cement extravasation and radiographic changes. A 'complication' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is likely to affect the patient's final outcome, including infection, neurologic injury and intrathoracic central glenoid screw placement.Radiographic changes around the glenoid or humeral components of the RSA are very frequently observed and described in the literature.High complication rates related to the Grammont RSA design led to development of non-Grammont designs which led to a dramatic fall in the majority of complications.The percentage of radiological changes after RSA is not negligible and remains unsolved, despite a decrease in its occurrence in the last decade. However, such changes should be now considered as simple problems because they rarely have a negative influence on the patient's final outcome, and their prevalence has dramatically decreased.With further changes in indications and designs for RSA, it is crucial to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its new designs and increased indications. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1109-1121. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: survival and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite its potential biomechanical advantages, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is still considered to be particularly high risk in rheumatoid patients who are osteoporotic and immunodeficient. Our purpose was to report prosthesis survival, complications, and outcomes of RSA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including 65 consecutive primary RSAs performed in 59 patients with RA between 1991 and 2010. We excluded rheumatoid patients with previous failed anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Age at surgery averaged 69 years (range, 46-86 years). A structural bone grafting was performed in 18 cases (45%), using the humeral head in 15 cases (BIO-RSA technique), the iliac crest in 2 cases (Norris technique), and an allograft in 1 case. The mean follow-up was 92 months (range, 60-147 months) or until revision surgery.

RESULTS

Revision-free survivorship, using Kaplan-Meier curves, was 96% at 7 years. Two patients had revision surgeries for infections, with associated glenoid loosening in 1 case. No humeral loosening was recorded. The mean adjusted Constant score improved from 36% ± 23% preoperatively to 90% ± 26% postoperatively, and mean Subjective Shoulder Value improved from 21% ± 13% to 85% ± 12%, respectively (P < .001). Active anterior elevation increased from 65° ± 43° to 132° ± 27°, active external rotation increased from 10° ± 26° to 22° ± 27°, and internal rotation improved from buttocks to waist (P < .001). Stable fixation of the baseplate was achieved in all cases (including the 6 patients with end-stage RA), and we did not observe bone graft nonunion or resorption. Preoperative radiologic pattern (centered, ascending, or destructive), presence of acromial fractures or tilt (4 cases, 10%), and scapular notching (55%) on final radiographs were not found to influence outcomes or complication rate. Patients with absent/atrophied teres minor had lower functional results. Overall, 95% of the patients were satisfied with the procedure.

CONCLUSION

RSA is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of RA patients, with a low risk of complications and low rate of revision, regardless of the radiologic presentation and stage of the disease. Rheumatoid patients undergoing primary RSA, with or without glenoid bone grafting, can expect a revision-free survival rate of 96% at 7-year follow-up. RSA offers the benefit of solving 2 key problems encountered in rheumatoid shoulders: glenoid bone destruction and rotator cuff deficiency.

One Versus 2-Stage Revision for Shoulder Arthroplasty Infections: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Treatment Selection Bias

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the optimal treatment for infection following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the bias in treatment selection, infection clearance rates, and functional outcomes after 1 versus 2-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic shoulder infections.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in 4 phases. Articles were identified using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library databases with Boolean search terms related to infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Included articles were analyzed for quality, and data were extracted for use. Preoperative treatment selection bias was analyzed and postoperative infection clearance rates and functional outcome scores were compared between 1 and 2-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic shoulder infection.

RESULTS

Overall, 163 1-stage shoulder procedures and 289 2-stage shoulder procedures were included in the analysis. Cutibacterium acnes was the organism most frequently grown on culture (37%) followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (19%). The overall infection clearance rate was 95.6% for 1-stage and 85.2% for 2-stage procedures. In a comparison of the change in outcome scores from preoperatively to postoperatively between 1-stage and 2-stage revision, the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) improved 21.0 points (1-stage) versus 22.8 points (2-stage), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score improved 26.2 points versus 33.6 points, and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score improved 3.5 points versus 6.4 points, respectively. Overall, 23 of 26 studies cited a reason for selection of a 1 versus 2-stage procedure, which was due to standard treatment protocol in 10 studies, based on the timing of the infection (acute versus subacute versus chronic) in 5, due to a combination of factors (age, comorbidities, intraoperative appearance, adequacy of debridement, bone loss) in 6, and due to preoperative identification of a specific organism in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage revisions resulted in higher infection clearance rates; however, 2-stage revisions resulted in greater functional improvement as measured with ASES and SST scores from the preoperative assessment to the final postoperative follow-up. The decision between 1 and 2-stage revisions is due to a combination of factors including pathogen type, timing of infection, findings on the preoperative clinical examination, the patient's own decision, the surgeon's preference, and the intraoperative soft-tissue/osseous appearance, which may have biased the overall results. There is no consensus in the literature on the decision between 1 and 2-stage treatment for periprosthetic shoulder infection, which is based on a combination of factors. However, both treatment strategies are effective in treating periprosthetic shoulder infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does the retention of osseointegrated prosthetic implants during the surgical management of chronic infections following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) influence functional outcomes without impacting the efficacy of the infection treatment?

INTRODUCTION

The gold standard (GS) for treating chronic infections following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a complete exchange of the prosthesis carried out in one or two stages. This surgical procedure, which may damage the bone stock, can result in poor functional outcomes due to intraoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the GS to a surgical technique that retained osseointegrated implants: the partial one-stage exchange.

HYPOTHESIS

Partial one-stage exchange was effective in treating chronic infections after RTSA (no recurrent infection) and resulted in better functional outcomes than the GS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 18 patients with chronic infection after a primary RTSA. Two treatments were compared in a non-randomized fashion. The first included 11 patients who underwent a partial one-stage exchange with implant retention in case of macroscopic osseointegration. The second included seven patients who were treated with the GS: six patients with a complete one-stage exchange and one patient with a two-stage surgical approach. The absence of recurrent infection and functional outcomes were assessed after a minimum of two years.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in treatment efficacy between the two strategies: 91% vs. 100%, respectively. The partial one-stage exchange resulted in a significantly improved shoulder function compared to the GS with postoperative Constant scores of 55±14.58 vs. 44±14.45, respectively (p=.03). In the partial one-stage exchange group, there was a significantly improved shoulder function with a preoperative Constant score of 40 [28-55]±9.04 preoperatively vs. 55 [25-75]±14.58 postoperatively (p=.01). The GS treatment did not significantly improve the postoperative function (p=.09).

DISCUSSION

Partial one-stage exchange does not compromise treatment efficacy of chronic infections after RTSA. This technique resulted in better shoulder function than a conventional GS-type management. A study with greater statistical power is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; clinical series, retrospective, single-center.

Diabetes is an independent risk factor for infection after non-arthroplasty shoulder surgery: a national database study

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes has been associated with poor healing and prior literature has shown worse functional outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing both open and arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, the effects of diabetes on perioperative complications for patients undergoing non-arthroplasty type shoulder procedures are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of diabetes on 30-day complications following non-arthroplasty shoulder surgery.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients who underwent open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures (excluding arthroplasty) from 2011 to 2018. Diabetic patients were identified and compared to a non-diabetic cohort. Demographic data and postoperative complications within 30 days were analyzed. Multivariable regression was used to determine the effect of diabetes on shoulder surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 99,970 patients who underwent shoulder surgery in our cohort and 13.9% (13,857 patients) of these patients were diabetics. Within the diabetic cohort, 4,394 (31.7%) were insulin dependent. Diabetics were more likely to be older, female, and have a higher body mass index (P < 0.01). Diabetics had a higher rate of associated medial comorbidities (P < 0.05). Diabetics were less likely to be smokers and on average had shorter surgeries (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that diabetes was associated with increased risk for infectious and other major and minor complications; however, multivariate regression revealed that diabetes was only independently associated with infection (OR 1.33, P = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

While diabetes is associated with increased likelihood of infection following shoulder surgery, absent commonly associated comorbidities, they are not at increased risk for other 30-day postoperative complications.

Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an ideal treatment for glenohumeral dysfunction due to cuff tear arthropathy. As the number of patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, the incidence of complications after this procedure also is increasing. The rate of complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty was reported to be 15%-24%. Recently, the following complications have been reported in order of frequency: periprosthetic infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, neurologic injury, scapular notching, acromion or scapular spine fracture, and aseptic loosening of prosthesis. However, the overall complication rate has varied across studies because of different prosthesis used, improvement of implant and surgical skills, and different definitions of complications. Some authors included complications that affect the clinical outcomes of the surgery, while others reported minor complications that do not affect the clinical outcomes such as minor reversible neurologic deficit or minimal scapular notching. This review article summarizes the processes related to diagnosis and treatment of complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the aim of helping clinicians reduce complications and perform appropriate procedures if/when complications occur.

Is postoperative glucose variability associated with adverse outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Postoperative infection after shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating complication. Multiple patient risk factors have been associated with postoperative infection, including increased body mass index and diabetes. Although the association between preoperative glucose control and infection has been established, little is known about the effect of perioperative glycemic control on outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between postoperative glycemic variability and short-term complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at a large, single-specialty center from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were included if they underwent primary TSA or RTSA with a minimum of 90 days' follow-up and had a minimum of 1 serum glucose value obtained per day of the hospital stay or had ≥3 measurements obtained during the hospital admission period. The primary outcome variable was postoperative infection per accepted definitions of surgical-site infection or periprosthetic joint infection. Secondary outcome variables included stiffness, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic dislocation, and reoperation.

RESULTS

In total, 1074 TSAs or RTSAs (in 1032 patients) met the eligibility criteria. The mean patient age was 69.9 ± 8.4 years, and 40.3% of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Of the patients, 670 (62%) had a calculable coefficient of variation. A younger patient age (median, 65 years [interquartile range (IQR), 13.5 years] vs. 71 years [IQR, 11.0 years]; P = .02) and a preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (P = .01) showed statistically significant associations with postoperative infection. The first in-hospital glucose measurement beyond the reference tertile of 70-140 mg/dL showed a statistically significant association with postoperative infection, with a median of 128.0 mg/dL (IQR, 43 mg/dL) vs. 167.5 mg/dL (IQR, 37.0 mg/dL; P = .01), whereas the second and third glucose measurements showed no association with postoperative infection. We found no associations between the coefficient of variation and reoperations or complications including surgical-site infection, periprosthetic joint infection, death, postoperative infection, periprosthetic fracture, or stiffness.

CONCLUSION

We found an association between a preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and postoperative infection following shoulder arthroplasty. We also found that an elevated first glucose measurement is associated with the development of postoperative infection. In-hospital glycemic control, as well as preoperative glycemic control and optimization, may be beneficial for reducing postoperative infections following shoulder arthroplasty.

Cutibacterium acnes infections in revision surgery for persistent shoulder complaints: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Low-grade Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) infections after shoulder surgery usually result in unexplained complaints. The absence of clinical signs of infection makes the incidence unclear and underreported. This study aimed to determine the incidence of C. acnes infections in patients with artificial material and unexplained persistent shoulder complaints. We hypothesized that the incidence of C. acnes infections would be higher in patients with artificial material. Risk factors and associations between culture time and contaminations/infections were also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with and without artificial material undergoing revision shoulder surgery for persistent complaints after primary surgery and the suspicion of a low-grade infection. Three-six cultures were taken in all patients. C. acnes infection incidence was determined and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. The association between time to culture growth and infections/contaminations was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test.

RESULTS

26/61 (42.6%) patients with and 14/33 (42.2%) without material had a C. acnes infection. Age (OR 0.959; 95% CI 0.914-1.000) and BMI (OR 0.884; 95% CI 0.787-0.977) were risk factors. Time to C. acnes culture positivity was not different between infections and contaminations.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of C. acnes infections was 42.6% in patients with artificial material and 42.2% in patients without artificial material. Younger age and lower BMI are risk factors. Low-grade C. acnes infections should be considered in patients with unexplained persistent complaints following shoulder surgery.

Limited improvement and high rate of complication in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for previous native shoulder infection

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) surgery for the sequelae of former septic native joint shoulder arthritis are unknown but might be inferior to patients without prior bacterial arthritis.

METHODS

We performed a single-center case-control study embedded in our prospective RTSA cohort. We matched all patients with prior infections in a 1:1 ratio with patients who underwent RTSA for other indications. The matching variables were indication for surgery, age, sex, dominant/nondominant shoulder, and body mass index. We evaluated outcomes by Constant score and active function.

RESULTS

Among 1249 patients in the RTSA cohort, 14 were operated for sequelae of previous native shoulder joint infections. Although both groups significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative values, the outcome of postinfectious patients was clearly inferior in comparison with the control group (absolute [38 ± 17 vs. 75 ± 8, P < .01], relative Constant score [47 ± 19 vs. 88 ± 9, P < .01], Constant pain score [11.0 ± 3.1 vs. 14.3 ± 1.3, P < .01], subjective shoulder value [43 ± 26 vs. 85 ± 10, P < .01], abduction [70 ± 43 vs. 148 ± 29°, P = .001], and elevation [82 ± 49° to 131 ± 16°, P = .02]). Moreover, in the postinfectious group, overall surgical complications occurred in 36%, with the need for revision in 21%. There was, however, no recurrence of infection in any of the patients' shoulders.

CONCLUSION

RTSA for end-stage postinfectious joint disease is associated with a high number of complications and reoperations. Clinical outcomes are inferior to those without past infection.

Larger polyethylene glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are they safe?

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is gaining popularity owing to its proven longevity and good outcome scores. Scapular notching remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the safety of larger polyethylene glenospheres with increased eccentricity in comparison with the more conventional metal bearings. The secondary effects on scapular notching, clinical outcomes, range of movement, and complications were also analyzed.

Methods

We conducted a 10-year retrospective review of 145 SMR reverse shoulder arthroplasties (LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy) in 132 patients with radiographs at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the survivorship of the larger polyethylene glenospheres. Secondary outcomes were the presence and size of notching, subjective satisfaction score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Score, range of motion, and shoulder-related complications.

Results

No failures of the polyethylene glenospheres were noted in the 10-year period. At a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up, notching was noted in 16 (25%) of the metal glenospheres vs. 9 (11.1%) of the polyethylene glenospheres (P = .028). The mean Oxford Shoulder Score was lower for the metal glenospheres (P = .005). Range of motion, complications, and overall satisfaction were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

The inverted bearing configuration demonstrated no failures at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. A larger study is required to determine whether the decreased incidence and size of early notching are related to the bearing size or material.

Periprosthetic Infection After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Periprosthetic infection is a relatively rare but potentially devastating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this article is to review the incidence, diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a focus on literature published within the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection provides us with a framework for the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher reported rate of infection compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our current diagnostic tests do not appear to be as sensitive when compared with the hip and knee literature. Similar success has been reported with single and two-stage revision protocols, although prospective comparative data are lacking. The significance of unexpected positive cultures during revision arthroplasty remains unclear. We report current diagnostic and therapeutic options for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the current literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Further high-level studies are warranted to refine these definitions and guide management.

Single-stage versus two-stage revision for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication after arthroplasty with high morbidity. An evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of shoulder PJI is lacking in current practice. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to understand and compare the role of single- and 2-stage shoulder arthroplasty revision for PJI.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all studies related to shoulder arthroplasty for PJI in PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria for this systematic review were studies that reported on single- or 2-stage revision, with infection eradication and a minimum follow-up of 12 months and a minimum of 5 patients for analysis. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q and I2.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies reporting on single-stage revision and 30 studies reporting on 2-stage revision were included in final analysis. The majority of positive cultures from single-stage revision for PJI resulted in Cutibacterium acnes with 113 of 232 (48.7%) reported cases compared with 190 of 566 (33.7%) reported cases for 2-stage revision. However, there was a lower percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus positive cultures, with 2.5% for single-stage compared with 9.7% for 2-stage revision. The overall pooled random-effect reinfection incidence was 0.05 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.08), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 34%, P = .02). The reinfection rate was 6.3% for single-stage and 10.1% for 2-stage revision, but this was not significant (Q = 0.9 and P = .40).

CONCLUSION

Based on a systematic review with meta-analysis, single-stage revision for shoulder PJI is an effective treatment. Indeed, our analysis showed single-stage to be more effective than 2-stage, but this is likely confounded by a treatment bias given the higher propensity of virulent and drug-resistant bacteria treated with 2-stage in the published literature. This implies that shoulder surgeons treating PJI can be reassured of a low recurrence rate (6.3%) when using single-stage treatment for C acnes or other sensitive, low-virulence organisms.

The use of tobacco is a modifiable risk factor for poor outcomes and readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty

Aims

The impact of tobacco use on readmission and medical and surgical complications has been documented in hip and knee arthroplasty. However, there remains little information about the effect of smoking on the outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesized that active smokers are at an increased risk of poor medical and surgial outcomes after TSA.

Methods

Data for patients who underwent arthroplasty of the shoulder in the USA between January 2011 and December 2015 were obtained from the National Readmission Database, and 90-day readmissions and complications were documented using validated coding methods. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to quantify the risk of smoking on the outcome after TSA, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital-level confounding factors.

Results

A total of 196,325 non-smokers (93.1%) and 14,461 smokers (6.9%) underwent TSA during the five-year study period. Smokers had significantly increased rates of 30- and 90-day readmission (p = 0.025 and 0.001, respectively), revision within 90 days (p < 0.001), infection (p < 0.001), wound complications (p < 0.001), and instability of the prosthesis (p < 0.001). They were also at significantly greater risk of suffering from pneumonia (p < 0.001), sepsis (p = 0.001), and myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), postoperatively.

Conclusion

Smokers have an increased risk of readmission and medical and surgical complications after TSA. These risks are similar to those found for smokers after hip and knee arthroplasty. Many surgeons choose to avoid these elective procedures in patients who smoke. The increased risks should be considered when counselling patients who smoke before undertaking TSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1549–1554.

The use of tobacco is a modifiable risk factor for poor outcomes and readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty

AIMS

The impact of tobacco use on readmission and medical and surgical complications has been documented in hip and knee arthroplasty. However, there remains little information about the effect of smoking on the outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesized that active smokers are at an increased risk of poor medical and surgial outcomes after TSA.

METHODS

Data for patients who underwent arthroplasty of the shoulder in the USA between January 2011 and December 2015 were obtained from the National Readmission Database, and 90-day readmissions and complications were documented using validated coding methods. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to quantify the risk of smoking on the outcome after TSA, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital-level confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 196,325 non-smokers (93.1%) and 14,461 smokers (6.9%) underwent TSA during the five-year study period. Smokers had significantly increased rates of 30- and 90-day readmission (p = 0.025 and 0.001, respectively), revision within 90 days (p < 0.001), infection (p < 0.001), wound complications (p < 0.001), and instability of the prosthesis (p < 0.001). They were also at significantly greater risk of suffering from pneumonia (p < 0.001), sepsis (p = 0.001), and myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Smokers have an increased risk of readmission and medical and surgical complications after TSA. These risks are similar to those found for smokers after hip and knee arthroplasty. Many surgeons choose to avoid these elective procedures in patients who smoke. The increased risks should be considered when counselling patients who smoke before undertaking TSA.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Early Outcomes, Pitfalls, and Challenges

Objective

To evaluate the early outcomes and risk factors of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on RA patients who had undergone RSA between January 2016 and January 2018. Preoperative glenohumeral joint damage was evaluated according to two radiographic classification systems. The severity of joint damage was estimated using Larsen's method, while the Levigne‐Franceschi method was used to assess the type of destruction. Further, we recorded intra‐ and postoperative complications. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of shoulder pain while shoulder function was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. In addition, patients' subjective outcome and range of shoulder motion were recorded. Radiographs were taken and examined during the follow‐up period. Paired t‐test was used to determine the difference in measurement data between preoperative and the last follow‐up. VAS was analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test.

Results

A total of 14 patients with 14 shoulders were included. All the patients were female with an average age of 60.29 years (range, 49–71 years) at the time of surgery and an average RA disease duration of 24.57 years (range, 5–40 years). Seven of the 14 patients had a history of joint surgery related to RA. Meanwhile, 11 of the 14 shoulders showed glenoid bone defect, and eccentric reaming was performed intraoperatively to avoid base plate malposition. The mean follow‐up period for the 14 patients was 2.76 years (range, 2–4 years). The mean VAS decreased from a value of 5.71 ± 1.10 preoperatively to 1.36 ± 0.61 postoperatively (P < 0.001). On the contrary, the ASES score showed an increase from 33.93 ± 6.89 to 76.67 ± 5.23 (P < 0.001). An increase in active forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation with the arm in 90° of abduction from 85.71° ± 17.61°, 77.14° ± 19.43°, and 17.14° ± 10.97° to 126.43° ± 5.23°, 106.42° ± 11.72°, and 38.57° ± 14.57°, respectively, was observed (P < 0.001). Subjective outcome assessment showed that 13 of the 14 patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the operation, while one patient was uncertain due to co‐existing ipsilateral elbow lesion. Notably, one patient acquired a humeral periprosthetic fracture during the operation. In this study, no major complications such as periprosthetic joint infection and dislocation or implant loosening were observed. Further, no patients underwent revision for any reason at the end of the follow‐up.

Conclusions

RSA could achieve good early outcomes without high complication rates in patients with RA. Glenoid bone defects and adjacent joints involvement were common in this patient group, which might increase the risk of surgery and affect postoperative satisfaction.

Correlation between Body Mass Index and Periprosthetic Joint Infection following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite rapid reports on the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty, some have conducted regression tests or meta-analyses with controversial results. In this study, we systematically meta-analyzed relevant trials and carefully evaluated the correlation for verification.

METHODS

Literature on the correlation between BMI and PJI following total joint arthroplasty was retrieved in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library due September 2019. Stata 13.0 software was adopted for data synthesis and analyses of publication bias and sensitivity. Random-effect models were used to summary the overall estimate of the multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR)/hazard ratio/rate ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 29 observational studies representing 3,204,887 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk of postoperative PJI significantly increased by 1.51 times in the obese group (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.30-1.74 for the obese group vs. the non-obese group), and by 3.27 times in the morbid obese group (OR = 3.27; 95% CI = 2.46-4.34 for the morbid obese group vs the non-morbid obese group). A significant association remained consistent, as indicated by subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that postoperative PJI is positively correlated with BMI, with obese patients showing a greater risk of developing PJI than non-obese patients. Similarly, morbid obese patients present a higher risk of PJI than non-morbid obese patients. However, this conclusion needs to be corroborated by more prospective studies.