1
|
Prentice HA, Harris JE, Sucher K, Fasig BH, Navarro RA, Okike KM, Maletis GB, Guppy KH, Chang RW, Kelly MP, Hinman AD, Paxton EW. Improvements in Quality, Safety and Costs Associated with Use of Implant Registries Within a Health System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:404-415. [PMID: 38368191 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are intended to enhance quality, safety, and cost reduction using real-world data for a self-improving health system. Starting in 2001, Kaiser Permanente established several medical device CQRs as a quality improvement initiative. This report examines the contributions of these CQRs on improvement in health outcomes, changes in clinical practice, and cost-effectiveness over the past 20 years. METHODS Eight implant registries were instituted with standardized collection from the electronic health record and other institutional data sources of patient characteristics, medical comorbidities, implant attributes, procedure details, surgical techniques, and outcomes (including complications, revisions, reoperations, hospital readmissions, and other utilization measures). A rigorous quality control system is in place to improve and maintain the quality of data. Data from the Implant Registries form the basis for multiple quality improvement and patient safety initiatives to minimize variation in care, promote clinical best practices, facilitate recalls, perform benchmarking, identify patients at risk, and construct reports about individual surgeons. RESULTS Following the inception of the Implant Registries, there was an observed (1) reduction in opioid utilization following orthopedic procedures, (2) reduction in use of bone morphogenic protein during lumbar fusion allowing for cost savings, (3) reduction in allograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent decrease in organizationwide revision rates, (4) cost savings through expansion of same-day discharge programs for joint arthroplasty, (5) increase in the use of cement fixation in the hemiarthroplasty treatment of hip fracture, and (6) organizationwide discontinuation of an endograft device associated with a higher risk for adverse outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. CONCLUSION The use of Implant Registries within our health system, along with clinical leadership and organizational commitment to a learning health system, was associated with improved quality and safety outcomes and reduced costs. The exact mechanisms by which such registries affect health outcomes and costs require further study.
Collapse
|
2
|
Flurin PH, Abadie P, Lavignac P, Laumonerie P, Throckmorton TW. Outpatient vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: complication rates, clinical outcomes, and eligibility parameters. JSES Int 2024; 8:483-490. [PMID: 38707575 PMCID: PMC11064623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Improvements in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), fast-track surgery, multimodal anesthesia, and rehabilitation protocols have opened up the possibility of outpatient care that is now routinely practiced at our European institution. The first objective of this study was to define the TSA outpatient population and to verify that outpatient management of TSA does not increase the risk of complications. The second objective was to determine patient eligibility parameters and the third was to compare functional outcomes and identify influencing factors. Methods The study included 165 patients who had primary TSA (106 outpatient and 59 inpatient procedures). The operative technique was the same for both groups. Demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions were collected. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California Los Angeles shoulder, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1.5, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction and visual analog scale pain scores also were documented. Statistical analysis was completed using multivariate linear regression. Results Outpatients were significantly younger and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores than inpatients. The rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations were not significantly different between groups. Outpatient surgery was not an independent risk factor for complications. At 1.5 months, better outcomes were noted in the outpatient group for all scores, and these reached statistical significance. Distance to home, dominant side, operative time, and blood loss were not associated with functional results. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that outpatient care was significantly associated with improved scores at 1.5 months and did not affect functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion This study reports the results of routine outpatient TSA within a European healthcare system. TSA performed in an outpatient setting was not an independent risk factor for complications and seemed to be an independent factor in improving early functional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Thomas W. Throckmorton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Univeristy of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang D, Dyer GSM, Earp BE. The Relationship Between Preoperative International Normalized Ratio and Postoperative Major Bleeding in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2024; 8:01979360-202404000-00010. [PMID: 38569086 PMCID: PMC10994459 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-23-00174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to assess the relationship between preoperative international normalized ratio (INR) levels and major postoperative bleeding events after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for TSA from 2011 to 2020. A final cohort of 2405 patients with INR within 2 days of surgery were included. Patients were stratified into four groups: INR ≤ 1.0, 1.0 < INR ≤ 1.25, 1.25< INR ≤ 1.5, and INR > 1.5. The primary outcome was bleeding requiring transfusion within 72 hours, and secondary outcome variables included complication, revision surgery, readmission, and hospital stay duration. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses adjusted for relevant comorbidities were done. RESULTS Of the 2,405 patients, 48% had INR ≤ 1.0, 44% had INR > 1.0 to 1.25, 7% had INR > 1.25 to 1.5, and 1% had INR > 1.5. In the adjusted model, 1.0 < INR ≤ 1.25 (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.176 to 2.459), 1.25 < INR ≤ 1.5 (OR 2.508, 95% CI 1.454 to 4.325), and INR > 1.5 (OR 3.200, 95% CI 1.233 to 8.302) were associated with higher risks of bleeding compared with INR ≤ 1.0. DISCUSSION The risks of thromboembolism and bleeding lie along a continuum, with higher preoperative INR levels conferring higher postoperative bleeding risks after TSA. Clinicians should use a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach to balance competing risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafang Zhang
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp), and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp)
| | - George S. M. Dyer
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp), and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp)
| | - Brandon E. Earp
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp), and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim M, Ling K, Tantone RP, Al-Humadi S, Wang K, VanHelmond TA, Komatsu DE, Wang ED. Investigating immediate postoperative medical complication risks relative to in-hospital length of stay after total shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int 2023; 7:2467-2472. [PMID: 37969519 PMCID: PMC10638588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complication rates within 30 days of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Methods All patients who underwent either anatomic or reverse TSA between 2015 and 2019 were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database. The study population was stratified into three cohorts as follows: LOS 0 (same-day discharge), LOS 1 (next-day discharge), and LOS 2-3 (LOS of 2-3 days). Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared between cohorts using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between LOS and postoperative complications. Results In comparison to the LOS 0 day cohort, LOS 2-3 day cohort had a greater likelihood of developing overall complication (OR, 2.598; P < .001), major complication (OR, 1.885; P < .001), minor complication (OR: 3.939; P < .001), respiratory complication (OR: 12.979; P = .011), postoperative anemia requiring transfusion (OR, 23.338; P < .001), non-home discharge (OR, 10.430; P < .001), and hospital readmission (OR, 1.700; P = .012). Similarly, in comparison to the LOS 1 cohort, LOS 2-3 cohort had a greater likelihood of developing overall complication (OR: 2.111; P < .001), major complication (OR, 1.423; P < .001), minor complication (OR, 3.626; P < .001), respiratory complication (OR, 2.057; P < .001), sepsis or septic shock (OR: 2.795; P = .008), urinary tract infection (OR, 1.524; P = .031), postoperative anemia requiring transfusion (OR, 10.792; P < .001), non-home discharge (OR: 10.179; P < .001), hospital readmission (OR, 1.395; P < .001), and return to the operating room (OR. 1.394; P = .014). There was no significant difference in the risk of developing postoperative complications between LOS 0 day and LOS 1 day cohort. On baseline, the LOS 1 and LOS 2-3 day cohort had a higher proportion of patients with the following demographics and comorbidities compared to LOS 0 day cohort: advanced age, higher body mass index, female gender, positive smoking status, insulin-dependent diabetes, noninsulin-dependent diabetes, dyspnea at rest and moderate exertion, partially dependent functional status, an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 or higher, a history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of congestive heart failure, the use of hypertension medication, disseminated cancer, wound infection, the use of steroids, and a history of bleeding disorder. Conclusion Patients who were discharged on the same and next day following TSA demonstrated a reduced probability of experiencing respiratory complications, infections, postoperative anemia requiring transfusion, non-home discharge, and readmission in comparison to those with a LOS of 2-3 days. There was no difference in postoperative complications between same and nextday discharged patients. Patients who underwent outpatient arthroplasty were healthier at baseline compared to those who underwent inpatient arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Kim
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Kenny Ling
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Ryan P. Tantone
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Samer Al-Humadi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Wang
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Taylor A. VanHelmond
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - David E. Komatsu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Edward D. Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hachadorian M, Chang RN, Prentice HA, Paxton EW, Rao AG, Navarro RA, Singh A. Association between same-day discharge shoulder arthroplasty and risk of adverse events in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3: a cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e556-e564. [PMID: 37268285 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is well-supported in the literature; however, most studies have focused on healthier patients. Indications for same-day discharge SA have expanded to include patients with more comorbidities, but safety of same-day discharge in this population remains unknown. We sought to compare outcomes following same-day discharge vs. inpatient SA in a cohort of patients considered higher risk for adverse events, defined as an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of ≥3. METHODS Data from Kaiser Permanente's SA registry were utilized to conduct a retrospective cohort study. All patients with an ASA classification of ≥3 who underwent primary elective anatomic or reverse SA in a hospital from 2018 to 2020 were included. The exposure of interest was in-hospital length of stay: same-day discharge vs. ≥1-night hospital inpatient stay. The likelihood of 90-day post-discharge events, including emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, cardiac complication, venous thromboembolism, and mortality, was evaluated using propensity score-weighted logistic regression with noninferiority testing using a margin of 1.10. RESULTS The cohort included a total of 1814 SA patients, of whom 1005 (55.4%) had same-day discharge. In propensity score-weighted models, same-day discharge was not inferior to an inpatient stay SA regarding 90-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64, one-sided 95% upper bound [UB] = 0.89) and overall complications (OR = 0.67, 95% UB = 1.00). We lacked evidence in support of noninferiority for 90-day ED visit (OR = 0.96, 95% UB = 1.18), cardiac event (OR = 0.68, 95% UB = 1.11), or venous thromboembolism (OR = 0.91, 95% UB = 2.15). Infections, revisions for instability, and mortality were too rare to evaluate using regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of over 1800 patients with an ASA of ≥3, we found same-day discharge SA did not increase the likelihood of ED visits, readmissions, or complications compared with an inpatient stay, and same-day discharge was not inferior to an inpatient stay with regard to readmissions and overall complications. These findings suggest that it is possible to expand indications for same-day discharge SA in the hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hachadorian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Richard N Chang
- Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Heather A Prentice
- Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth W Paxton
- Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Anita G Rao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwest Permanente Medical Group, Vancouver, WA, USA
| | - Ronald A Navarro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, South Bay, CA, USA
| | - Anshuman Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allen J, Abdelmonem M, Fieraru G, Guyver P. Introducing A Day-Case Shoulder Arthroplasty Pathway In The UK - How We Did It. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:311-320. [PMID: 37325384 PMCID: PMC10268136 DOI: 10.1177/17585732221079582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Background As the demand for elective orthopaedics grows, day-case arthroplasty is gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to create a safe and reproducible pathway for day-case shoulder arthroplasty (DCSA) based upon a literature review and discussion with the local multidisciplinary team (MDT). Methods A literature review was performed using OVID MEDLINE and Embase databases reporting 90-day complication and admission rates following DCSA. Minimum follow-up was 30 days. Day-case was defined as discharge on the same day of surgery. Results The literature review revealed a mean 90-day complication rate of 7.7% [range, 0-15.9%] and mean 90-day readmission rate of 2.5% [range 0-9.3%]. A pilot protocol was devised based upon the literature review and consisted of 5 phases: (1) pre-operative assessment, (2) intra-operative phase, (3) post-operative phase, (4) follow-up, and (5) readmission protocol. This was presented, discussed, amended, and ultimately ratified by the local MDT. In May 2021 the unit successfully completed its first day-case shoulder arthroplasty. Discussion This study proposes a safe and reproducible pathway for DCSA. Patient selection, well-defined protocols and communication within the MDT are important factors to achieve this. Further studies with extended follow-up will be needed to gauge long-term success within our unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Allen
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
- Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Mohamed Abdelmonem
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Gabriel Fieraru
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Paul Guyver
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reddy RP, Sabzevari S, Charles S, Singh-Varma A, Como M, Lin A. Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in the COVID-19 era: 90-day complications and risk factors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 32:1043-1050. [PMID: 36470518 PMCID: PMC9719845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the COVID-19 pandemic placing an increased burden on health care systems, shoulder arthroplasties are more commonly being performed as outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 90-day episode-of-care complications of consecutive shoulder arthroplasties defaulted for outpatient surgery without using a prior algorithm for patient selection and to assess for their risk factors. We hypothesized that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty would be a safe procedure for all patients, regardless of patient demographics and comorbidities. METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent planned outpatient anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between March 2020 and January 2022 with 3-month follow-up was performed. All patients were scheduled for outpatient surgery regardless of medical comorbidities. Patient demographics; pre/postoperative patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale, subjective shoulder value, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; pre/postoperative range of motion; and complications were collected from medical chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the following outcomes: 1. Unplanned overnight hospital stay, 2. 90-day unplanned emergency department (ED)/clinic visit, 3. 90-day hospital readmission, 4. 90-day complications requiring revision. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients (47% male, 17% tobacco users, 18% diabetics) with a mean age 69 ± 9 years were identified, of whom 92 underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and 35 underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. All patient-reported outcomes and range of motion were significantly improved at 3 months. There were 15 unplanned overnight hospital stays (11.8%) after the procedure. Within 90 days postoperatively, there were 17 unplanned ED/clinic visits (13.4%), 7 hospital readmissions (5.5%), and 4 complications requiring revision (3.1%). Factors predictive of unplanned overnight stay included age above 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 36.80 [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20-615.49]; P = .012), tobacco use (OR, 12.90 [95% CI, 1.23-135.31]; P = .033), and American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3 (OR, 13.84 [95% CI, 1.22-156.57]; P = .034). The only factor predictive of unplanned ED/clinic visit was age over 70 years old (OR, 7.52 [95% CI, 1.26-45.45]; P = .027). No factors were predictive of 90-day hospital readmission or revision. CONCLUSION Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is a safe procedure with excellent outcomes and low rates of readmissions and can be considered as the default plan for all patient undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Patients who are above 70 years of age, use tobacco, and have ASA score of 3, however, may be less suitable for outpatient arthroplasty and should be counseled regarding the higher risk of unplanned overnight hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv P Reddy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Soheil Sabzevari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shaquille Charles
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anya Singh-Varma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Como
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Albert Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khan AZ, Best MJ, Fedorka CJ, Belniak RM, Haas DA, Zhang X, Armstrong AD, Jawa A, O'Donnell EA, Simon JE, Wagner ER, Malik M, Gottschalk MB, Updegrove GF, Makhni EC, Warner JJP, Srikumaran U, Abboud JA. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shoulder arthroplasty: surgical trends and postoperative care pathway analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:2457-2464. [PMID: 36075547 PMCID: PMC9444574 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 triggered disruption in the conventional care pathways for many orthopedic procedures. The current study aims to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shoulder arthroplasty hospital surgical volume, trends in surgical case distribution, length of hospitalization, posthospital disposition, and 30-day readmission rates. METHODS This study queried all Medicare (100% sample) fee-for-service beneficiaries who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty procedure (Diagnosis-Related Group code 483, Current Procedural Terminology code 23472) from January 1, 2019, to December 18, 2020. Fracture cases were separated from nonfracture cases, which were further subdivided into anatomic or reverse arthroplasty. Volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries was calculated from April to December 2020 and compared to the same months in 2019. Length of stay (LOS), discharged-home rate, and 30-day readmission for the same period were obtained. The yearly difference adjusted for age, sex, race (white vs. nonwhite), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Category risk score, month fixed effects, and Core-Based Statistical Area fixed effects, with standard errors clustered at the provider level, was calculated using a multivariate analysis (P < .05). RESULTS A total of 49,412 and 41,554 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) cases were observed April through December for 2019 and 2020, respectively. There was an overall decrease in shoulder arthroplasty volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries by 14% (19% reduction in anatomic TSA, 13% reduction in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and 3% reduction in fracture cases). LOS for all shoulder arthroplasty cases decreased by 16% (-0.27 days, P < .001) when adjusted for confounders. There was a 5% increase in the discharged-home rate (88.0% to 92.7%, P < .001), which was most prominent in fracture cases, with a 20% increase in discharged-home cases (65.0% to 73.4%, P < .001). There was no significant change in 30-day hospital readmission rates overall (P = .20) or when broken down by individual procedures. CONCLUSIONS There was an overall decrease in shoulder arthroplasty volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries by 14% during the COVID-19 pandemic. A decrease in LOS and increase in the discharged-home rates was also observed with no significant change in 30-day hospital readmission, indicating that a shift toward an outpatient surgical model can be performed safely and efficiently and has the potential to provide value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Z Khan
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew J Best
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Robert M Belniak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Starling Physicians Group, New Britain, CT, USA
| | | | | | - April D Armstrong
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Bone and Joint Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Boston Sports and Shoulder Center, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Evan A O'Donnell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason E Simon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric R Wagner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Gary F Updegrove
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Bone and Joint Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Eric C Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jon J P Warner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Uma Srikumaran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Joseph A Abboud
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelly PJ, Twomey-Kozak JN, Goltz DE, Wickman JR, Levin JM, Hinton Z, Lassiter TE, Klifto CS, Anakwenze OA. Perioperative pain control represents the primary concern for patients considering outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a survey-based study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:e628-e633. [PMID: 35998781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outpatient (OP) total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with same-day discharge can now be performed safely in appropriately selected patients. Patient knowledge and perspectives regarding OP TSA are yet unknown and such information may inform surgeon decision-making and provide a framework for addressing patient concerns. The goal of this study was to understand and quantify patient knowledge of and concerns for OP TSA, with a working hypothesis that majority of patients are unaware of OP TSA as a realistic option and that their primary concern would be postoperative pain control. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center including patients who underwent anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and completed an OP TSA expectations questionnaire/survey. This survey was provided preoperatively and included demographic factors, self-rated health evaluation, and perioperative expectations. Surveys evaluated whether patients undergoing TSA had any prior awareness of OP TSA and evaluated their primary concern with same-day discharge. Secondary questions included an assessment of patient expectations of outcomes of outpatient vs. inpatient surgery as well as their expected length of inpatient stay. RESULTS A total of 122 patients who underwent anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty completed the questionnaire and comprised the study cohort. Fifty-two (42.6%) of the patients were unaware that OP TSA was an option, and 26 (50%) of these were comfortable with the idea of OP TSA. Comfort with OP TSA was significantly associated with higher subjective patient-reported health status. Fifty-eight patients (47.5%) expected that following TSA they would require <24 hours of in-hospital postoperative care. The primary concern for patients considering OP TSA was postoperative pain control, endorsed by 44.3% of patients, compared with 13.1% of patients stating this would be their primary concern if admitted as an inpatient postoperatively. Pain control being a primary concern was significantly different between those considering outpatient vs. inpatient TSA. Most patients anticipated that OP shoulder arthroplasty would lead to a better (36%) or comparable (53%) outcome, whereas only 11% had concerns that it would lead to a worse outcome. CONCLUSION Expanding OP TSA crucially depends on awareness and education. Perceived ability to control pain is an important concern. Patients may benefit from preoperative counseling, including emphasizing a comprehensive postoperative pain management strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - Daniel E Goltz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John R Wickman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jay M Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zoe Hinton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tally E Lassiter
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Oke A Anakwenze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Perera E, Flood B, Madden K, Goel DP, Leroux T, Khan M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes for outpatient vs. inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 2022; 14:523-533. [PMID: 36199506 PMCID: PMC9527489 DOI: 10.1177/17585732211007443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is growing in popularity as a cost-effective and potentially equally safe alternative to inpatient arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to investigate literature relating to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty, looking at clinical outcomes, complications, readmission, and cost compared to inpatient arthroplasty. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 6 April 2020. Methodological quality was assessed using MINORS and GRADE criteria. RESULTS We included 17 studies, with 11 included in meta-analyses and 6 in narrative review. A meta-analysis of hospital readmissions demonstrated no statistically significant difference between outpatient and inpatient cohorts (OR = 0.89, p = 0.49). Pooled post-operative complications identified decreased complications in those undergoing outpatient surgery (OR = 0.70, p = 0.02). Considerable cost saving of between $3614 and $53,202 (19.7-69.9%) per patient were present in the outpatient setting. Overall study quality was low and presented a serious risk of bias. DISCUSSION Shoulder arthroplasty in the outpatient setting appears to be as safe as shoulder arthroplasty in the inpatient setting, with a significant reduction in cost. However, this is based on low quality evidence and high risk of bias suggests further research is needed to substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Perera
- Epsom & St. Helier University NHS Hospital, London, UK
| | - Breanne Flood
- Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kim Madden
- Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Danny P Goel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Timothy Leroux
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Moin Khan
- Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada,Moin Khan, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 4A6.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Puzzitiello RN, Moverman MA, Pagani NR, Menendez ME, Salzler MJ. Current Status Regarding the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. HSS J 2022; 18:428-438. [PMID: 35846253 PMCID: PMC9247601 DOI: 10.1177/15563316211019398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have begun to transition total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to the outpatient setting in order to contain costs and reallocate resources. PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient TSA by assessing associated complication rates, clinical outcomes, and total treatment charges. METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases were queried in March 2020 for studies on outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were (1) a study population undergoing TSA, (2) discharge on the day of surgery, and (3) inclusion of at least 1 reported outcome. RESULTS Of 20 studies identified that met inclusion criteria, 14 were comparative studies involving an inpatient control group, 2 of which were matched by age and comorbidities. The remaining studies used control groups consisting of inpatient TSAs who were older or more medically infirm according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. The combined average age of the outpatient and inpatient groups was 66.5 and 70.1 years, respectively. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA had similar rates of readmissions, emergency department visits, and perioperative complications in comparison to inpatients. Patients also reported comparably high levels of satisfaction with outpatient procedures. Four economic analyses demonstrated substantial cost savings with outpatient TSA in comparison to inpatient surgery. CONCLUSION In carefully selected patients, outpatient TSA appears to be equally safe but less resource intensive than inpatient arthroplasty. Nonetheless, there remains a need for larger prospective studies to decisively characterize the relative safety of outpatient TSA among patients with similar baseline health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard N. Puzzitiello
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA,Richard N. Puzzitiello, MD, Department of
Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine,
Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | - Michael A. Moverman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas R. Pagani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariano E. Menendez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew J. Salzler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Seetharam A, Ghosh P, Prado R, Badman BL. Trends in outpatient shoulder arthroplasty during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) era: increased proportion of outpatient cases with decrease in 90-day readmissions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1409-1415. [PMID: 35091073 PMCID: PMC8789381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has placed an increased burden on health care resources, with hospitals around the globe canceling or reducing most elective surgical cases during the initial period of the pandemic. Simultaneously, there has been an increased interest in performing outpatient total joint arthroplasty in an efficient manner while maintaining patient safety. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) during the COVID-19 era with respect to outpatient surgery and postoperative complications. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of all primary anatomic and reverse TSAs performed at our health institution over a 3-year period (January 2018 to January 2021). All cases performed prior to March 2020 were considered the "pre-COVID-19 era" cohort. All cases performed in March 2020 or later comprised the "COVID-19 era" cohort. Patient demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities were also collected to appropriately match patients from the 2 cohorts. Outcomes measured included type of patient encounter (outpatient vs. inpatient), total length of stay, and 90-day complications. RESULTS A total of 567 TSAs met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 270 shoulder arthroplasty cases performed during the COVID-19 era and 297 cases performed during the pre-COVID-19 era. There were no significant differences in body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking status, or distribution of pertinent medical comorbidities between the 2 examined cohorts. During the COVID-19 era, 31.8% of shoulder arthroplasties were performed in an outpatient setting. This was significantly higher than the percentage in the pre-COVID-19 era, with only 4.5% of cases performed in an outpatient setting (P < .0001). The average length of stay was significantly reduced in the COVID-19 era cohort (0.81 days vs. 1.45 days, P < .0001). There was a significant decrease in 90-day readmissions during the COVID-19 era. No significant difference in 90-day emergency department visits, 90-day venous thromboembolism events, or 90-day postoperative infections was observed between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSION We found a significant increase in the number of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty cases being performed at our health institution during the COVID-19 era, likely owing to a multitude of factors including improved perioperative patient management and increased hospital burden from the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase in outpatient cases was associated with a significant reduction in average hospital length of stay and a significant decrease in 90-day readmissions compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. The study data suggest that outpatient TSA can be performed in a safe and efficient manner in the appropriate patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Brian L. Badman
- Reprint requests: Brian L. Badman, MD, 8607 E US 36, Avon, IN 46123, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goltz DE, Burnett RA, Levin JM, Wickman JR, Belay ES, Howell CB, Risoli TJ, Green CL, Simmons JA, Nicholson GP, Verma NN, Lassiter TE, Anakwenze OA, Garrigues GE, Klifto CS. Appropriate patient selection for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a risk prediction tool. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:235-244. [PMID: 34592411 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transition from inpatient to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty critically depends on appropriate patient selection, both to ensure safety and to counsel patients preoperatively regarding individualized risk. Cost and patient demand for same-day discharge have encouraged this transition, and a validated predictive tool may help decrease surgeon liability for complications and help select patients appropriate for same-day discharge. We hypothesized that an accurate predictive model could be created for short inpatient length of stay (discharge at least by postoperative day 1), potentially serving as a useful proxy for identifying patients appropriate for true outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS A multicenter cohort of 5410 shoulder arthroplasties (2805 anatomic and 2605 reverse shoulder arthroplasties) from 2 geographically diverse, high-volume health systems was reviewed. Short inpatient stay was the primary outcome, defined as discharge on either postoperative day 0 or 1, and 49 patient outcomes and factors including the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, sociodemographic factors, and intraoperative parameters were examined as candidate predictors for a short stay. Factors surviving parameter selection were incorporated into a multivariable logistic regression model, which underwent internal validation using 10,000 bootstrapped samples. RESULTS In total, 2238 patients (41.4%) were discharged at least by postoperative day 1, with no difference in rates of 90-day readmission (3.5% vs. 3.3%, P = .774) between cohorts with a short length of stay and an extended length of stay (discharge after postoperative day 1). A multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated high accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.762) for discharge by postoperative day 1 and was composed of 13 variables: surgery duration, age, sex, electrolyte disorder, marital status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, paralysis, diabetes, neurologic disease, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary circulation disease, cardiac arrhythmia, and coagulation deficiency. The percentage cutoff maximizing sensitivity and specificity was calculated to be 47%. Internal validation showed minimal loss of accuracy after bias correction for overfitting, and the predictive model was incorporated into a freely available online tool to facilitate easy clinical use. CONCLUSIONS A risk prediction tool for short inpatient length of stay after shoulder arthroplasty reaches very good accuracy despite requiring only 13 variables and was derived from an underlying database with broad geographic diversity in the largest institutional shoulder arthroplasty cohort published to date. Short inpatient length of stay may serve as a proxy for identifying patients appropriate for same-day discharge, although perioperative care decisions should always be made on an individualized and holistic basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Goltz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Robert A Burnett
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jay M Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John R Wickman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elshaday S Belay
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Claire B Howell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas J Risoli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia L Green
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Alan Simmons
- Rush Research Core, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil N Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tally E Lassiter
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oke A Anakwenze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher S Klifto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prior Nonshoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection Increases the Risk of Surgical Site Infection, Sepsis, and All-Cause Revision After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:133-139. [PMID: 34921545 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty is a known risk factor for infection in subsequent joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior nonshoulder PJI contributes to the increased risk of infectious complications, greater healthcare utilization, and increased revision surgery after primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). METHODS Patients who underwent primary TSA for osteoarthritis with prior nonshoulder PJI were identified in a national database (PearlDiver Technologies) using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes. These patients were propensity matched based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status, and obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2) to a control cohort of patients who underwent primary TSA for osteoarthritis without any prior PJI. Primary outcomes include 1- and 2-year revision rates. Secondary outcomes include healthcare-specific outcomes of readmission, emergency department visits, length of stay, and mortality. Bivariate analysis was conducted using chi-square tests to compare all outcomes and complications between both cohorts. RESULTS Compared with patients without prior PJI, those with prior PJI had a significantly higher risk of 90-day surgical site infection (7.61% versus 0.56%) and sepsis (1.79% versus 0.56%) after TSA (P < 0.05 for both). Patients with prior PJI also had a higher risk of 90-day readmission compared with those without prior PJI (3.36% versus 1.23%, P = 0.008). In terms of surgical complications, patients with prior PJI had significantly higher risk of 2-year revision surgery compared with patients without prior PJI (3.36% versus 1.57%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION Prior nonshoulder PJI of any joint increases rates of 90-day surgical site infection, sepsis, and hospital readmission, as well as 2-year all-cause revision after TSA. These results are important for risk-stratifying patients undergoing TSA with prior history of PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|
15
|
Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e233-e241. [PMID: 34644715 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Changes in healthcare policy have driven many hospital-based surgeries to the outpatient environment. Multiple studies have shown outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a safe alternative to the inpatient setting. This systematic review evaluates patient selection, perioperative protocols, complications, costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of outpatient TSA and compares these with their inpatient counterparts. METHODS The Emnbase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases were queried on April 30, 2020, for outpatient TSA studies, identifying 232 articles, with 21 meeting inclusion criteria. This involved 25,808 and 231,408 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Failed same-day discharge, readmissions, revision surgeries, cost, and complications among outpatient TSA were aggregated when raw numbers were available. Statistical significance for comparisons among outpatient and inpatient TSA within individual studies was alpha = 0.05. RESULTS Ten studies evaluated same-day discharge rate, with 440 of 446 patients (98.7%) meeting the goals. Fourteen studies evaluated readmissions, revision surgeries, and complications, with readmissions in 238 of 6,133 patients (3.9%), revision surgeries in 32 of 1,484 patients (2.1%), and complications in 376 of 4,977 patients (7.6%). Readmission rates were similar between inpatients and outpatients, with only one study finding more readmissions after inpatient TSA. Complications were more common in inpatient TSA in five studies. Outpatient TSA demonstrated a charge reduction of $25,509 to $53,202 per patient, and patient satisfaction after outpatient TSA was "good to excellent" in more than 95% of patients. Patient selection for outpatient TSA used patient age, medical comorbidities, social support, living proximity to location of surgery, and lack of preoperative opioid use. DISCUSSION Outpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient TSA. However, the literature is limited to national database or small retrospective studies. Large prospective, cohort studies are necessary to further assess differences in complication profiles between outpatient and inpatient TSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; systematic review.
Collapse
|
16
|
Allahabadi S, Cheung EC, Hodax JD, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Lansdown DA. Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2022; 5:24715492211028025. [PMID: 34993380 PMCID: PMC8492032 DOI: 10.1177/24715492211028025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA. Methods A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Results Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Allahabadi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Edward C Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jonathan D Hodax
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Chunbong B Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goltz DE, Burnett RA, Wickman JR, Levin JM, Howell CB, Nicholson GP, Verma NN, Anakwenze OA, Lassiter TE, Garrigues GE, Klifto CS. Short stay after shoulder arthroplasty does not increase 90-day readmissions in Medicare patients compared with privately insured patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:35-42. [PMID: 34118422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As of January 1, 2021, total shoulder arthroplasty was removed from the Medicare inpatient-only list, reflecting a growing belief in the potential merits of same-day discharge regardless of insurance type. It is yet unknown whether Medicare populations, which frequently have more severe comorbidity burdens, would experience higher complication rates relative to privately insured patients, who are often younger with fewer comorbidities. Given the limited number of true outpatient cohorts available to study, discharge at least by postoperative day 1 may serve as a useful proxy for true same-day discharge, and we hypothesized that these Medicare patients would have increased 90-day readmission rates compared with their privately insured counterparts. METHODS Data on 4723 total shoulder arthroplasties (anatomic in 2459 and reverse in 2264) from 2 large, geographically diverse health systems in patients having either Medicare or private insurance were collected. The unplanned 90-day readmission rate was the primary outcome, and patients were stratified into those who were discharged at least by postoperative day 1 (short inpatient stay) and those who were not. Patients with private insurance (n = 1845) were directly compared with those with Medicare (n = 2878), whereas cohorts of workers' compensation (n = 198) and Medicaid (n = 58) patients were analyzed separately. Forty preoperative variables were examined to compare overall health burden, with the χ2 and Wilcoxon rank sum tests used to test for statistical significance. RESULTS Medicare patients undergoing short-stay shoulder arthroplasty were not significantly more likely than those with private insurance to experience an unplanned 90-day readmission (3.6% vs. 2.5%, P = .14). This similarity existed despite a substantially worse comorbidity burden in the Medicare population (P < .05 for 26 of 40 factors). Furthermore, a short inpatient stay did not result in an increased 90-day readmission rate in either Medicare patients (3.6% vs. 3.4%, P = .77) or their privately insured counterparts (2.5% vs. 2.4%, P = .92). Notably, when the analysis was restricted to a single insurance type, readmission rates were significantly higher for reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with total shoulder arthroplasty (P < .001 for both), but when the analysis was restricted to a single procedure (anatomic or reverse), readmission rates were similar between Medicare and privately insured patients, whether undergoing a short or extended length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Despite a substantially more severe comorbidity profile, Medicare patients undergoing short-stay shoulder arthroplasty did not experience a significantly higher rate of unplanned 90-day readmission relative to privately insured patients. A higher incidence of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in Medicare patients does increase their overall readmission rate, but a similar increase also appears in privately-insured patients undergoing a reverse indicating that Medicare populations may be similarly appropriate for accelerated-care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Goltz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Robert A Burnett
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John R Wickman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jay M Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Claire B Howell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil N Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Oke A Anakwenze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tally E Lassiter
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher S Klifto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Trudeau MT, Peters JJ, LeVasseur MR, Hawthorne BC, Dorsey CG, Wellington IJ, Shea KP, Mazzocca AD. Inpatient Versus Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Propensity Score Matched Risk-Adjusted Analysis Demonstrates the Safety of Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty. J ISAKOS 2022; 7:51-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
19
|
Carbone A, Vervaecke AJ, Ye IB, Patel AV, Parsons BO, Galatz LM, Poeran J, Cagle P. Outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A cost and outcome comparison in a comorbidity matched analysis. J Orthop 2021; 28:126-133. [PMID: 34937996 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies comparing total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/RSA) are subject to surgeon selection bias. This study objective is to compare the outcomes and cost of outpatient TSA/RSA to inpatient TSA/RSA. Methods 108,889 elective inpatient and outpatient TSA/RSA from Medicare claims data (2016-2018). 90-day readmission and total 90-day costs were compared following propensity score matching. Results Younger and healthier patients are receiving outpatient TSA/RSA. Outpatient TSA/RSA was associated with fewer 90-day readmissions (OR 0.48 CI 0.38-0.59, p < 0.001) and lower 90-day costs (-20.1% CI -19.1%; -21.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Outpatient TSA/RSA surgery offers lower complication rates and total costs. Level of evidence III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Carbone
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ivan B Ye
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Akshar V Patel
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bradford O Parsons
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leesa M Galatz
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jashvant Poeran
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Healthy Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Cagle
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
O'Donnell EA, Fury MS, Maier SP, Bernstein DN, Carrier RE, Warner JJP. Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty Patient Selection, Patient Experience, and Cost Analyses: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202111000-00003. [PMID: 34757981 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty has been increasing. With increasing pressure to reduce costs, further underscored by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many health-care organizations will move toward outpatient interventions to conserve inpatient resources. Although abundant literature has shown the advantages of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is a relative paucity describing outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Thus, the purpose of this study was to summarize the peer-reviewed literature of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty with particular attention to patient selection, patient outcomes, and cost benefits. METHODS The PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Embase databases were queried according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All articles on outpatient shoulder arthroplasty were included. Data on patient selection, patient outcomes, and cost analyses were recorded. Patient outcomes, including complications, reoperations, and readmissions, were analyzed by weighted average. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were included for analysis. There were 3 review articles and 20 studies with Level-III or IV evidence as assessed per The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Level of Evidence criteria. Patient selection was most often predicated on age <70 years, body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2, absence of active cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and presence of home support. Complications and readmissions were not common and either improved or were equivalent to those of inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Patient satisfaction was high in studies of short-term and intermediate-term follow-up. The proposed cost benefit ranged from $747 to $53,202 with outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS The published literature to date supports outpatient shoulder arthroplasty as an effective, safe, and cost-reducing intervention with proper patient selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan A O'Donnell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew S Fury
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen P Maier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David N Bernstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert E Carrier
- University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, Maine
| | - Jon J P Warner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kucharik MP, Varady NH, Best MJ, Rudisill SS, Naessig SA, Eberlin CT, Martin SD. Comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity score–matched analysis of 20,035 procedures. JSES Int 2021; 6:15-20. [PMID: 35141670 PMCID: PMC8811397 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As the proportion of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) operations performed at outpatient surgical sites continues to increase, it is important to evaluate the clinical implications of this evolution in care. Methods Patients who underwent TSA for glenohumeral osteoarthritis from 2007 to 2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry. Demographic data and 30-day outcomes were collected, and patients were separated into inpatient and outpatient (defined as same day discharge) groups. To control for confounding variables, a propensity score–matching algorithm was utilized. Outcomes included 30-day adverse events, readmission, and operative time. Results A total of 20,035 patients who underwent aTSA between 2007 and 2019 were identified: 18,707 inpatient aTSAs and 1328 outpatient aTSAs. On matching, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics between inpatient and outpatient cohorts. Patients who underwent outpatient aTSA were less likely to experience a serious adverse event when compared with their matched inpatient aTSA counterparts (outpatient: 1.1% vs. inpatient: 2.1%, P = .03). Outpatient aTSA was associated with similar rates of all specific individual complications and readmissions (1.5% vs. 1.9%, P = .31). Conclusion When compared with a propensity score–matched cohort of inpatient counterparts, the present study found outpatient aTSA was associated with significantly reduced severe adverse events and similar readmission rates. These findings support the growing use of outpatient aTSA in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Kucharik
- Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
- Corresponding author: Michael P. Kucharik, BS, BS Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Nathan H. Varady
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew J. Best
- Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sara A. Naessig
- Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher T. Eberlin
- Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott D. Martin
- Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mehta N, Bohl DD, Cohn MR, McCormick JR, Nicholson GP, Garrigues GE, Verma NN. Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time. JSES Int 2021; 6:7-14. [PMID: 35141669 PMCID: PMC8811390 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to investigate changes over time. Methods Patients undergoing primary TSA during 2006-2019 as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Patients were divided into an early cohort (2006-2016, 12,401 patients) and a late cohort (2017-2019, 12,845 patients). Outpatient procedures were defined as those discharged on the day of surgery. Patient comorbidities and rate of adverse events within 30 days postoperatively were compared with adjustment for baseline characteristics using standard multivariate regression. Results There was a significant reduction in complications over time when considering all cases (5.69% in the early cohort vs. 3.67% in the late cohort, adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.73, P < .001). The rate of complications decreased over time among inpatients (5.80% vs. 3.90%, adjusted RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60-0.76, P < .001). However, there was no difference in the rate of complications among outpatients over time (1.98% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.28-1.47, P = .293). There were significantly more complications among inpatients vs. outpatients in both the early and late cohorts (early: 5.80% vs. 1.98%, adjusted RR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.24-5.34, P = .011, late: 3.90% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.74, P = .001). TSA became more common in elderly patients over 70 years of age over time in both the inpatient and outpatient cohorts, whereas fewer young patients (aged 18-59 years) underwent TSA in the late cohorts than in the early cohorts for both the inpatient and outpatient samples (P < .001). Conclusion The overall complication rate of TSA has decreased over time as outpatient TSA has become increasingly common. When contemporary data are examined, the complication rate of outpatient procedures has remained constant over time while that of inpatient procedures decreased, despite the changing demographics of patients undergoing TSA. This indicates that outpatient TSA remains a safe procedure as patient selection criteria have evolved, while the safety of inpatient TSA continues to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Mehta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Corresponding author: Nabil Mehta, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St, Suite 360, Chicago, IL 60621, USA.
| | - Daniel D. Bohl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Matthew R. Cohn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Gregory P. Nicholson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Grant E. Garrigues
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil N. Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kayum S, Kooner S, Khan RM, Halai M, Awoke A, Kanani A, Montgomery S, Meldrum A, Daniels TR. Safety and Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty. FOOT & ANKLE ORTHOPAEDICS 2021; 6:24730114211057888. [PMID: 35097480 PMCID: PMC8646201 DOI: 10.1177/24730114211057888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a surgical procedure commonly reserved for patients suffering from symptomatic end-stage ankle arthritis. As the number of TAAs increases, so does the associated economic burden. Given these economic constraints, there has been interest in the feasibility of outpatient TAA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and satisfaction of patients undergoing outpatient TAA. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent outpatient TAA from July 2018 to June 2019. Inclusion criteria included any patient undergoing a primary TAA in the outpatient setting. This was defined as discharge on the same day of surgery or within 12 hours of surgery. All surgeries were completed by a single experienced surgeon through an anterior approach using the Cadence Total Ankle System. Prior to surgery, all patients received a popliteal nerve block. Patients were then discharged home with oral analgesic and a popliteal nerve catheter, which they removed after 48 hours. The primary outcome of interest was postoperative pain control, which was measured using a numeric scale. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, readmission rate, and patient satisfaction. A review of the current literature was then completed to supplement our results. Results: In total, 41 patients were included in our analysis. In terms of the primary outcome, the average numeric scale score was 1.98, indicating excellent pain control. Additionally, nearly all 41 patients stated they were very satisfied with their postoperative pain control regimen. In terms of secondary outcomes, the majority of patients stated they were satisfied with discharge on the same day as surgery. There were no readmissions or major complications in our outpatient TAA cohort. When asked if they would recommend the care they experienced to a friend with the same condition, 95% of patients said that they would recommend this care pathway. Our literature review included 5 original studies, which were all retrospective level IV studies. These studies uniformly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of outpatient TAA. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate the outpatient TAA is associated with excellent pain control using a multidisciplinary pain approach. The use of standardized outpatient postoperative pathways was effective in preventing readmissions and complications, while still resulting in high patient satisfaction scores. A review of the literature complemented our results, as there are largely no significant differences between outpatient and inpatient TAA. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahin Kayum
- Unity Health Toronto-St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sahil Kooner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ryan M Khan
- Unity Health Toronto-St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mansur Halai
- Unity Health Toronto-St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Awoke
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Asa Kanani
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Spencer Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Timothy R Daniels
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Unplanned Emergency and Urgent Care Visits After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS 2021; 5:01979360-202109000-00012. [PMID: 34543235 PMCID: PMC8454905 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction This study sought to determine (1) incident risk, (2) chief report, (3) risk factors, and (4) total cost of unplanned healthcare visits to an emergency and/or urgent care (ED/UC) facility within 30 days of an outpatient orthopaedic procedure. Methods This was a retrospective database review of 5,550 outpatient surgical encounters from a large metropolitan healthcare system between 2012 and 2016. Statistical analysis consisted of measuring the ED/UC incident risk, respective to the procedures and anatomical region. Patient-specific risk factors were evaluated through multigroup comparative statistics. Results Of the 5,550 study patients, 297 (5.4%) presented to an ED/UC within 30 days of their index procedure, with 23 (0.4%) needing to be readmitted. Native English speakers, patients older than 45 years, and nonsmokers had significant reduced relative risk of unplanned ED or UC visit within 30 days of index procedure (P < 0.01). In addition, hand tendon repair/graft had the greatest risk incidence for ED/UC visit (11.0%). Unplanned ED/UC reimbursements totaled $146,357.34, averaging $575.65 per visit. Discussion This study provides an evaluation of outpatient orthopaedic procedures and their relationship to ED/UC visits. Specifically, this study identifies patient-related and procedural-related attributes that associate with an increased risk for unplanned healthcare utilization.
Collapse
|
25
|
Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1968-1976. [PMID: 33675972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amid rising health care costs and recent advances in surgical and anesthetic protocols, the rate of outpatient joint arthroplasty has risen steadily in recent years. Although the safety of outpatient total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty has been well established, outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is still in its infancy. The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current literature and provide further data regarding the outcomes and safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following the standard PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included were studies that evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse TSA. Meta-analysis was conducted using Mantel-Haenszel statistics to generate odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing outpatient and inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS Twelve studies were included, with a total of 194,513 patients, of whom 7162 were outpatients. Of the studies, 8 were level III and 4 were level IV. The average age of the outpatients was 66.6 years, and the average age of the inpatients was 70.1 years. The overall OR for complications was significantly lower in outpatients (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.35-0.45) than in inpatients. There was no significant difference in rates of 90-day readmission (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.03), revision (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65-1.41), and infection (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35) when comparing outpatients with inpatients. CONCLUSION Outpatient TSA, in an appropriately selected patient population, is safe and results in comparable patient outcomes to those of inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Given the expected increase in the number of patients requiring TSA, surgeons, hospital administrators, and insurance carriers should strongly consider the merits of a cost- and care-efficient approach to total shoulder replacement.
Collapse
|
26
|
Polisetty TS, Grewal G, Drawbert H, Ardeljan A, Colley R, Levy JC. Determining the validity of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) tool for identifying patients for safe same-day discharge after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1794-1802. [PMID: 33290852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early discharge has been a target of cost-control efforts given the growing demand for joint replacement surgery. The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score, a medically based risk-assessment score, has shown high predictive ability in achieving safe early discharge following outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty using a score threshold initially set at ≤59 points but more recently adapted to ≤79 points. However, no study has been performed using the OARA tool for shoulder replacement, which has been shown to have lower associated medical risks than lower-extremity arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the OARA score threshold for same-day discharge (SDD) following shoulder arthroplasty and evaluate its effectiveness in selecting patients for SDD. We hypothesized that the OARA score threshold for shoulder arthroplasty would be higher than that for lower-extremity arthroplasty. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 422 patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty between April 2018 and October 2019 performed by a single surgeon. As standard practice, all patients were counseled preoperatively regarding SDD and given the choice to stay overnight. Medical history, length of stay, and 90-day readmissions were obtained from medical records. Analysis of variance testing and screening test characteristics compared the performance of the OARA score vs. the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) class and a previously published OARA score threshold used to define a low risk of outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty. RESULTS A preoperative OARA score cutoff of ≤110 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.0% for identifying patients with SDD after shoulder arthroplasty, compared with 66.7% using the hip and knee OARA score threshold of ≤59 points (P < .0001) and 80.4% using ASA-PS class ≤ 2 (P = .008). OARA scores ≤ 110 points also showed a negative predictive value of 98.9% and a false-negative rate of 2.0% but remained incomprehensive with a specificity of 24.0% (P < .0001). Analysis of variance demonstrated that mean OARA scores increased significantly with length of stay (P = .001) compared with ASA-PS classes (P = .82). Patients with OARA scores ≤ 110 points were also 2.5 times less likely to have 90-day emergency department visits (P = .04) than those with OARA scores > 110 points. There was no difference in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for patients with OARA scores ≤ 59 points, OARA scores ≤ 110 points, and ASA-PS classes ≤ 2. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that a preoperative OARA score threshold of ≤110 points is effective and conservative in screening patients for SDD following shoulder arthroplasty, with low rates of 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions. This threshold is a useful screening tool to identify patients who are not good candidates for SDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gagan Grewal
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Hans Drawbert
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Ardeljan
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Ryan Colley
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Frequency and Timing of Complications and Catastrophic Events After Same-Day Discharge Compared With Inpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:S264-S271. [PMID: 33663888 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty (THA) has grown in utilization although concerns exist regarding early complications and catastrophic events. We sought to compare the risk of complications and catastrophic events for same-day and inpatient stay THA. METHODS A cohort study was conducted using Kaiser Permanente's total joint replacement registry. Primary elective THA were identified (2017-2018). Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate risk for 90-day incident events, including emergency department (ED) visit, unplanned readmission, cardiac complication, deep infection, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and mortality, by in-hospital length of stay: same-day vs 1-2-night inpatient stay. RESULTS The study sample comprised 13,646 THA, 6033 (44.1%) with a same-day discharge. Median days-to-events for same-day vs inpatient was 11 vs 12 for ED visit, 23 vs 20 for readmission, 38 vs 12 for cardiac complication, 28 vs 24 for deep infection, 14.5 vs 23.5 for VTE, and 7 vs 35.5 for mortality. In propensity score-weighted models, same-day discharge THA had a lower risk for 90-day ED visit (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94), readmission (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.61-0.92), and cardiac complication (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.76), compared with inpatient stay THA; no difference was observed for deep infection (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.81-3.12), VTE (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.52-1.58), or mortality (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.27-2.40). CONCLUSION We observed a lower or no difference in risk for complications and catastrophic events after same-day THA than an inpatient stay. Catastrophic events were more likely to occur early in the 90-day period, but an inpatient stay did not preclude events.
Collapse
|
28
|
Huddleston HP, Mehta N, Polce EM, Williams BT, Fu MC, Yanke AB, Verma NN. Complication rates and outcomes after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. JSES Int 2021; 5:413-423. [PMID: 34136848 PMCID: PMC8178605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As the number of total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) performed annually increases, some surgeons have begun to shift toward performing TSAs in the outpatient setting. However, it is imperative to establish the safety of outpatient TSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to define complication, readmission, and reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient TSA. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using three databases (PubMed, Ovid, and Embase). English-language publications describing results on complication rates in patients who underwent TSA in an outpatient or ambulatory setting were included. All nonclinical and deidentified database studies were excluded. Bias assessment was conducted with the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria. Results Seven studies describing outcomes in outpatient TSA were identified for inclusion. The included studies used varying criteria for selecting patients for an outpatient procedure. The total outpatient 90-day complication rate (commonly including hematomas, wound issues, and nerve palsies) ranged from 7.1%-11.5%. Readmission rates ranged from 0%-3.7%, and emergency and urgent care visits ranged from 2.4%-16.1%. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly after outpatient TSA in all studies. Two studies found a higher complication rate in the comparative inpatient cohort (P = .023-.027). Methodologic index for nonrandomized studies scores ranged from 9 to 11 (of 16) for noncomparative studies (n = 3), while all comparative studies received a score of a 16 (of 24). Conclusion Outpatient TSA in properly selected patients results in a similar complication rate to inpatient TSA. Further studies are needed to aid in determining proper risk stratification to direct patients to inpatient or outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Evan M Polce
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Michael C Fu
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Adam B Yanke
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vajapey SP, Contreras ES, Neviaser AS, Bishop JY, Cvetanovich GL. Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Evaluating Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202105000-00002. [PMID: 33956691 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthopaedic surgical procedures are increasingly being performed in outpatient settings. The drive for cost reduction without compromising patient safety and outcomes has increased interest in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The primary aim of this study was to perform a review of the evidence regarding the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of outpatient TSA. METHODS A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using several keywords: "outpatient," "shoulder replacement," "ambulatory," "day case," "day-case," "shoulder arthroplasty," "same day," and "shoulder surgery." Studies that were published from May 2010 to May 2020 in the English language were considered. Research design, questions, and outcomes were recorded for each study. Qualitative and quantitative pooled analysis was performed on the data where appropriate. RESULTS Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Six retrospective studies compared complication rates between inpatient and outpatient cohorts and found no significant differences. Four studies found that the complication rate was lower in the outpatient cohort compared with the inpatient cohort. In a pooled analysis, the readmission rate after outpatient TSA was significantly lower than the readmission rate after inpatient TSA at 30 days (0.65% vs. 0.95%) and 90 days (2.03% vs. 2.87%) postoperatively (p < 0.05 for both). Four studies evaluated the cost of outpatient TSA in comparison with inpatient TSA. All of these studies found that TSA at an ambulatory surgery center was significantly less costly than TSA at an inpatient facility, both for the health-care system and for the patient. Patient selection for outpatient TSA may depend on several important factors, including the presence or absence of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, poor functional status, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, chronic narcotic use, higher body mass index, and older age. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that patient selection is the most critical factor that predicts the success of outpatient TSA. While outpatient TSA is significantly less costly than inpatient TSA, patients undergoing outpatient TSA are more likely to be healthier than patients undergoing inpatient TSA. More high-quality long-term studies are needed to add to this body of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravya P Vajapey
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dillon MT, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Royse KE, Paxton EW, Okike K, Khatod M, Navarro RA. The effect of a statewide COVID-19 shelter-in-place order on shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture volume and length of stay. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 31:339-345. [PMID: 34334985 PMCID: PMC7923956 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Although the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted elective shoulder arthroplasty throughput, traumatic shoulder arthroplasty procedures are less apt to be postponed. We sought to evaluate shoulder arthroplasty utilization for fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic and California's associated shelter-in-place order compared to historical controls. Methods We conducted a cohort study with historical controls, identifying patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture in California using our integrated electronic health record. The time period of interest was following the implementation of the statewide shelter-in-place order: March 19, 2020-May 31, 2020. This was compared to three historical periods: January 1, 2020-March 18, 2020, March 18, 2019-May 31, 2019, and January 1, 2019-March 18, 2019. Procedure volume, patient characteristics, in-hospital length of stay, and 30-day events (emergency department visit, readmission, infection, pneumonia, and death) were reported. Changes over time were analyzed using linear regression adjusted for usual seasonal and yearly changes and age, sex, comorbidities, and postadmission factors. Results Surgical volume dropped from an average of 4.4, 5.2, and 2.6 surgeries per week in the historical time periods, respectively, to 2.4 surgeries per week after shelter-in-place. While no more than 30% of all shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed during any given week were for fracture during the historical time periods, arthroplasties performed for fracture was the overwhelming primary indication immediately after the shelter-in-place order. More patients were discharged the day of surgery (+33.2%, P = .019) after the shelter-in-place order, but we did not observe a change in any of the corresponding 30-day events. Conclusions The volume of shoulder arthroplasty for fracture dropped during the time of COVID-19. The reduction in volume could be due to less shoulder trauma due to shelter-in-place or a change in the indications for arthroplasty given the perceived higher risks associated with intubation and surgical care. We noted more patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for fracture were safely discharged on the day of surgery, suggesting this may be a safe practice that can be adopted moving forward. Level of Evidence Level III; Retrospective Case-control Comparative Study
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Dillon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Priscilla H Chan
- Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Kathryn E Royse
- Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Kanu Okike
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Monti Khatod
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, West Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ronald A Navarro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, South Bay, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ahmed AF, Hantouly A, Toubasi A, Alzobi O, Mahmoud S, Qaimkhani S, Ahmed GO, Al Dosari MAA. The safety of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2021; 45:697-710. [PMID: 33486581 PMCID: PMC7892728 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-04940-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To meet the increasing demands of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) while reducing its financial burden, there has been a shift toward outpatient surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of outpatient TSA. Methods The primary objective was to compare re-admission rates and postoperative complications in outpatient versus inpatient TSA. The secondary objectives were functional outcomes and costs. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched until March 28, 2020. The inclusion criteria were studies reporting at least complications or readmission rates within a period of 30 days or more. Results Ten level III retrospective studies were included with 7637 (3.8%) and 192,025 (96.2%) patients underwent outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Outpatient TSA had relatively younger and healthier patients. There were no differences between outpatient and inpatient arthroplasty for 30- and 90-day readmissions. Furthermore, unadjusted comparisons demonstrated significantly less total and major surgical complications, less total, major, and minor medical complications in favour of outpatient TSA. However, subgroup analyses demonstrated that there were no significant differences in all complication if the studies had matched controls and regardless of data source (database or nondatabase studies). The revision rates were similar between both groups at a 12–24 months follow-up. Two studies reported a significant reduction in costs in favour of outpatient TSA. Conclusion This study highlights that outpatient TSA could be a safe and effective alternative to inpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients. It was evident that outpatient TSA does not lead to increased readmissions, complications, or revision rates. A potential additional benefit of outpatient TSA was cost reduction. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00264-021-04940-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz F Ahmed
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Ashraf Hantouly
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ammar Toubasi
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Osama Alzobi
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Shady Mahmoud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Saeed Qaimkhani
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ghalib O Ahmed
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
- Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Resident, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Differences in 30-day outcomes between inpatient and outpatient total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2640-2645. [PMID: 32619659 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the health care system in the United States shifts toward value-based care, there has been increased interest in performing total joint arthroplasty in the outpatient setting to optimize costs, outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Several studies have demonstrated success in performing ambulatory total knee and hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and complications after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) across the inpatient and outpatient operative settings. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify 575 patients undergoing primary TEA using the Current Procedural Terminology code 24363. Of this sample, 458 were inpatient and 117 were outpatient procedures. Propensity score matching using a 3:1 inpatient-to-outpatient ratio was performed to account for baseline differences in several variables-age, sex, body mass index class, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and various comorbidities-between the inpatient and outpatient groups. After matching, the rates of various short-term outcomes and complications were compared between the inpatient and outpatient groups. RESULTS Inpatient TEA was associated with a higher rate of complications relative to outpatient TEA, including non-home discharge (14.9% vs. 7.5%, P = .05), unplanned hospital readmission (7.4% vs. 0.9%, P = .01), surgical complications (7.6% vs. 2.6%, P = .04), and medical complications (3.6% vs. 0.0%, P = .04). CONCLUSION Outpatient TEA has a lower short-term complication rate than inpatient TEA. Outpatient TEA should be considered for patients for whom such a discharge pathway is feasible. Future research should focus on risk stratification of patients and specific criteria for deciding when to pursue outpatient TEA.
Collapse
|