The treatment of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures: a systematic review

Surgical Treatment of Coronoid Fracture With Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability: An Instructional Review

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow is one of the complex elbow instability. The primary sites of injury encompass fractures of the anteromedial coronoid process and injuries to the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow. Some patients may present with involvement of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. Owing to its distinctive injury mechanism and imaging characteristics, this condition is infrequent in clinical practice and susceptible to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Literature reviews indicate that conservative management of VPMRI is associated with numerous complications, such as persistent pain, traumatic arthritis, and chronic elbow instability. Consequently, surgical intervention has emerged as the recommended treatment modality. Nonetheless, the lack of systematic research on VPMRI in clinical practice has been inconclusive regarding the optimal internal fixation techniques and surgical approaches. Therefore, investigating the treatment modalities, surgical techniques, and internal fixation strategies for VPMRI associated with coronoid fractures holds substantial importance for informing clinical management. In this review, we systematically synthesize the existing literature on coronoid fractures with VPMRI for offering a valuable reference for future clinical treatment.

Prognostic value of the CURL classification system for proximal ulna fracture dislocations of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Proximal ulna fracture dislocations comprise a wide spectrum of injury. The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius and Ligaments (CURL) classification is a simple framework designed to aid surgical decision-making by focusing attention on the key components of the injury and their relative severity. It has been demonstrated to have a high interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of the CURL classification with respect to patient outcome.

METHODS

The CURL framework was applied retrospectively to 182 patients treated surgically for a proximal ulna fracture dislocation in a level 1 trauma center. Patient outcomes collected included complication rate, reoperations, patient satisfaction, and Oxford Elbow Score (OES). The CURL score overall and each individual component were assessed for the effect on outcome. Appropriateness of surgical fixation was also assessed and correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

Of 182 patients, 69 (37.9%) had at least 1 major or minor complication and the overall CURL score was associated with a higher rate of complications (r = 0.85, P = .02). The presence of a coronoid fracture as well as the radial head and ligament components was associated with increased complications (coronoid: r = 0.26, P < .01; radial head: r = 0.36, P < .01; ligament: r = 0.38, P < .01). The complication rate was higher as the CURL value increased for both coronoid and radial head components (coronoid score 0 = 30.9%, coronoid score 1 = 54.6%, coronoid score 2 = 69.2% and radial head score 0 = 26.1%, radial head score 1 = 50.0%, radial head score 2 = 73.3%). The median OES was 43, and the total CURL score was correlated with inferior OES (r = -0.89, P = .01) as were the coronoid, radial head, and ligament components (coronoid: r = -0.43, P < .01; radial head: r = -0.38, P < .01; ligament: r = -0.42, P < .01). The proximal ulna fracture severity was not correlated with increased complication rate or OES. Patients deemed to have inappropriate fixation (20.8%) had a significantly higher complication rate (65.8% vs. 30.5%, P ≤ .001), with the 9 patients with inadequate coronoid fixation demonstrating a 100.0% complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Proximal ulna fracture dislocations have a high complication rate and are intolerant to inadequate fixation. The CURL system demonstrates prognostic value with the coronoid component most influential on outcome.

Suture button systems for coronoid fracture fixation: a biomechanical time-zero pilot study

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe a fixation technique for coronoid fractures using suture buttons, and to biomechanically evaluate this technique in comparison to screw fixation as a time-zero pilot study.

METHODS

An O'Driscoll type 2 anteromedial coronoid facet (AMCF) fracture was simulated in 20 fresh-frozen human elbows. The specimens were randomized into two groups and fracture fixation was performed with either a suture button system or a 3.5 mm cannulated screw. Ultimate load-to-failure (N) was then tested for each specimen.

RESULTS

The mean load-to-failure was 322.6 ± 75.9 N for suture button fixation and 314.2 ± 85.9 N for screw fixation. The differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.432). Additional fracturing of the coronoid fragment was observed in two specimens with screw fixation.

CONCLUSION

Promising biomechanical evaluations show that this fixation technique using suture buttons in the treatment of coronoid fractures provides equal construct stability as screw fixation. Further studies are required to fully validate this procedure.

Surgical outcomes and complication rates of arthroscopic-assisted fixation versus open fixation for coronoid fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Coronoid fractures often occur with complex elbow dislocations, accounting for 15% of elbow fractures. The effectiveness of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus arthroscopic-assisted reduction internal fixation (ARIF) surgeries for coronoid fractures remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of these two surgical approaches in treating varus posteromedial injuries.

Methods

This study was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The primary outcomes assessed in this study were the functional outcomes measured by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the complications associated with each surgical approach.

Results

Analysis of the data from 759 patients included in this study revealed that the mean postoperative MEPS score was higher in the ARIF group compared to the ORIF group (97.5 Vs. 90.7), with the mean improvement in MEPS was 16.6 points (19 for ORIF and 14.3 for ARIF). The complication rate in the ORIF group was 24.6%, while the ARIF group reported a complication rate of 6%.

Conclusion

This study suggests that ARIF surgery can yield comparable and promising outcomes to ORIF surgery for coronoid fractures.

Level of evidence

IV.

Medial elbow approaches for coronoid fractures: risk to the ulnar nerve

Background

Coronoid fractures often require open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to restore elbow stability. The flexor pronator split, flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) split, and Taylor and Scham (T&S) approaches are frequently used medial approaches to access the coronoid. The ulnar nerve can be released or transposed when performing these exposures. The optimal medial surgical approach and management of the ulnar nerve has not been clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative ulnar nerve complications in coronoid fractures undergoing ORIF following a medial surgical approach and ulnar nerve release or transposition.

Methods

A retrospective review of 91 patients with coronoid fractures treated with ORIF using a medial approach from 2004 to 2022 was performed at three academic medical centers. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who sustained coronoid fractures with or without associated injuries were included. Patient charts and perioperative imaging were reviewed. Patient demographics, fracture classification, associated injuries, surgical approaches, ulnar nerve management, and postoperative complications were recorded. Primary outcomes assessed were signs and symptoms of postoperative ulnar nerve neuropathy.

Results

The mean age of the cohort was 45 ± 16 years, 71% were males, with a mean length of follow-up of 16 ± 22 months. Of the 91 coronoid fractures, 69 were anteromedials, eight were tips, and 14 were basal types. The incidence of preoperative ulnar neuropathy was 5% (n = 5). The incidence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy was 33% (n = 30) of which 55% (n = 16) completely resolved by final follow-up. The rate of postoperative ulnar neuropathy was not significantly different between in situ release 30% (n = 9) or transposition of the ulnar nerve 34% (n = 20), (P = .64). There was a significantly higher rate of postoperative resolution with transposition (70%) versus in situ release (22%), (P = .045). The rate of postoperative ulnar neuropathy was not significantly different between the FCU, T&S, or flexor pronator split approaches, (P = .331). Finally, the rate of neuropathy resolution was not significantly different between medial approaches (P = .46).

Conclusion

There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative ulnar nerve complications with ulnar nerve transposition or in situ release following coronoid fixation. However, transposing the nerve resulted in a higher rate of neuropathy resolution. While the incidence of postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction is high following coronoid fixation when using a medial surgical approach, it was similar with the FCU, T&S, and flexor pronator split approaches. Larger cohorts and randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Outcomes and complications after treatment for anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process is associated with varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI). However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment for AMF fracture. The purpose of this study is to report on a systematic review of the outcomes and complications after treatment for AMF fracture.

METHODS

This study was conducted using electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus. Studies reporting outcome scores and complications were included. Studies that did not utilize O'Driscoll classification for AMF fractures were excluded. Through conduct of a thorough review of included studies, definite VPMRI were identified and cases involving other injury mechanisms were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles reporting on 246 patients were included. According to O'Driscoll classification, 6.2% of cases were anteromedial subtype I, 73.7% were subtype II, and 20.1% were subtype III. Two-hundred sixteen patients (87.8%) were treated surgically and 30 patients (12.2%) were treated conservatively. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries were 76.2% (157/206) and medial collateral ligament injuries were 16.9% (33/195). Among 216 cases who underwent surgical treatment, depending on the fragment size, displacement, and instability, coronoid fixation was performed in 189 cases and LCL repair alone was performed in 27 cases. The mean final Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.1 and the Broberg & Morrey score was 89.5. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 17.7% (41/232) and 12.9% (26/202).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical and conservative treatment for AMF fractures resulted in satisfactory final clinical outcomes. However, high complication and reoperation rates were observed.

Factors associated with the choice of treatment for coronoid fractures

Aims

This study aimed to gather insights from elbow experts using the Delphi method to evaluate the influence of patient characteristics and fracture morphology on the choice between operative and nonoperative treatment for coronoid fractures.

Methods

A three-round electronic (e-)modified Delphi survey study was performed between March and December 2023. A total of 55 elbow surgeons from Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America participated, with 48 completing all questionnaires (87%). The panellists evaluated the factors identified as important in literature for treatment decision-making, using a Likert scale ranging from "strongly influences me to recommend nonoperative treatment" (1) to "strongly influences me to recommend operative treatment" (5). Factors achieving Likert scores ≤ 2.0 or ≥ 4.0 were deemed influential for treatment recommendation. Stable consensus is defined as an agreement of ≥ 80% in the second and third rounds.

Results

Of 68 factors considered important in the literature for treatment choice for coronoid fractures, 18 achieved a stable consensus to be influential. Influential factors with stable consensus that advocate for operative treatment were being a professional athlete, playing overhead sports, a history of subjective dislocation or subluxation during trauma, open fracture, crepitation with range of movement, > 2 mm opening during varus stress on radiological imaging, and having an anteromedial facet or basal coronoid fracture (O'Driscoll type 2 or 3). An anterolateral coronoid tip fracture ≤ 2 mm was the only influential factor with a stable consensus that advocates for nonoperative treatment. Most disagreement existed regarding the treatment for the terrible triad injury with an anterolateral coronoid tip fracture fragment ≤ 2 mm (O'Driscoll type 1 subtype 1).

Conclusion

This study gives insights into areas of consensus among surveyed elbow surgeons in choosing between operative and nonoperative management of coronoid fractures. These findings should be used in conjunction with previous patient cohort studies when discussing treatment options with patients.

Optimal K-Wire Placement for Indirect Cannulated Screw Fixation of Coronoid Process Fractures: A Radiology-Based Guide

PURPOSE

Indirect fixation of coronoid process fractures of the ulna, especially arthroscopically, offers the possibility to avoid extensive medial surgical approaches. However, optimal placement of K-wires for cannulated screw fixation is technically challenging. The aim of the present study was to present guide values for K-wire placement for indirect screw fixation of coronoid tip (COT) and anteromedial facet (AMF) fractures of the ulna.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of the elbows of 197 patients with an uninjured ulna were identified and evaluated following a standard measuring protocol. Optimal placement of K-wires was defined as the bisector between the anterior and articular cortex while respecting a 1.6-mm safe zone for each placement. This placement of the K-wires in the COT and the AMF was analyzed by measuring the wire angulation in relation to the posterior ulnar cortex (AUC), the distance from the entry point to the posterior olecranon edge (DPE), and the intraosseous length (IOL). Because the coronoid has a curved shape, measurements of the COT and AMF were expected to differ significantly. Sex was also expected to influence measurements. To determine whether this optimal placement of K-wires can be reliably identified, interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were evaluated.

RESULTS

To address tip fragments, we determined a mean AUC of 64°, DPE of 36 mm, and IOL of 38 mm. Regarding wire placement toward the AMF, the means for the AUC, DPE, and IOL were 79°, 27 mm, and 33 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the COT and the AMF for the AUC, DPE, and IOL. Our measuring protocol showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

K-wire placement toward the COT demands a smaller angle, a longer IOL, and a more distal entry point than wires placed toward AMF. These differences reflect the curved and complex anatomy of the coronoid.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This measuring algorithm can be used to plan osteosynthesis, and the obtained reference values can help understand the coronoid's complex anatomy.

Pure varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: Radiographic findings, treatment, and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Although varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) is a subtle elbow injury that involves anteromedial coronoid facet (AMCF) fracture and ligamentous injuries, treatment options and outcomes of VPMRI remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate radiographic findings, treatments, and outcomes of a large series of VPMRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 91 pure VPMRI cases with AMCF fracture (O'Driscoll classification anteromedial type) which were treated at 6 hospitals. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were investigated with a mean follow-up period of 46.8 months using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) score, and serial plain radiographs.

RESULTS

In AMCF fracture, there were 4 cases of subtype 1, 67 cases of subtype 2, and 20 cases of subtype 3. On MRI, complete tears of lateral collateral ligament and medial collateral ligament were observed in 83.1 % (59/71 cases) and 33.8 % (24/71 cases). Operative treatment was performed in 68 cases (74.7 %) including both side fixation in 40 cases (58.8 %), medial side fixation only in 17 cases (25.0 %), and lateral side fixation only in 11 cases (16.2 %). Nonoperative treatment was performed in 23 cases (25.3 %). The mean final MEPS and Quick-DASH scores were 93.7 and 7.9. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 22.0 % and 15.4 %. No significant differences regarding final clinical scores and range of motions were observed between the operative group and the nonoperative group, but significant differences were observed regarding number (p = 0.019) and displacement (p = 0.002) of coronoid fragment, and complication rate (p < 0.001) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the pattern of coronoid fragment and the degree of ligamentous injuries, operative treatment of unstable VPMRI using various fixation techniques including coronoid fixation and ligament repair yielded satisfactory final clinical outcomes. However, surgeons should be aware of the high complication and reoperation rates after operative treatment. Stable VPMRI with AMCF fracture involving minimal displacement or small number of fragments can be treated nonoperatively.

Coronoid fractures and complex elbow instability: current concepts

Fractures of the coronoid process typically occur as part of more complex injury patterns, such as terrible triads, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, posteromedial rotatory injuries or Monteggia-like lesions. Each pattern is associated with a specific type of coronoid fracture with regard to shape and size and specific soft-tissue lesions. O' Driscoll classification incorporates those associations identifying three major types of fractures: tip, anteromedial facet, and basal fractures. The objective of this study is to review the most common types of complex elbow instability, identify the indications for coronoid fixation and guide the appropriate management. Tip fractures as those seen in terrible triads can conditionally left untreated provided that elbow stability has been restored after radial head fixation and ligaments repair. Anteromedial facet fractures benefit from a buttress plate, while large basilar fractures can be effectively secured with posteroanterior screws. Coronoid reconstruction with a graft should be considered in post-traumatic cases of chronic coronoid deficiency.

A Feasibility Study on Using Hanging Arm Test to Assess Elbow Stability During Surgical Treatment for Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability

Objectives

The aim of this study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of performing the hanging arm test during surgical treatment for elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) to assess elbow stability and determine whether to repair the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL).

Methods

In a retrospective study from August 2014 to March 2019, 27 patients with VPMRI who had a negative result in the hanging arm test after fixation of coronoid fracture were selected. Intraoperative bleeding, operative time, elbow range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded. Elbow function was evaluated with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score.

Results

The operation time was 85.9 ± 11.06 min (range 65-110). The intraoperative blood loss was 70.7 ± 9.31 ml (range 60-100). At the last follow-up, the elbow joint averaged 73.8° ± 2.931° in pronation, 78.9° ± 2.941° in supination, 7.2° ± 3.207° in extension, and 123.3° ± 6.651° in flexion. The MEPS score was 90.7 ± 4.36 (range 74-95), and the DASH score was 9.8 ± 2.58 (range 6.67-13.3). One patient presented with symptoms of ulnar nerve entrapment 2 months after operation and was treated with ulnar nerve release. The symptom of numbness went away completely 1 week after operation. No complications such as wound infection, arthritis, or chronic instability of the elbow were found in the other patients.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that not all VPMRI patients need the LUCL to be repaired, and the hanging arm test is a safe and reliable method to assess whether to repair the LUCL in the treatment of elbow VPMRI.

Level of evidence

Level IV; Retrospective studies.

Acute and chronic coronoid reconstruction using the olecranon Tip

Post-traumatic coronoid deficiency in the elbow can lead to chronic pain, instability and arthritis. A variety of osteochondral grafts have been used to reconstruct the coronoid, and restore elbow stability. The radial head and iliac crest grafts are the most common in the literature but have limitations. The olecranon tip is a promising alternative, with both cadaveric and computer models demonstrating superior congruency, without compromising elbow stability or disrupting the extensor mechanism. We present a small, case series demonstrating the technique for contralateral and ipsilateral grafts in both the acute and chronic setting.

Coronoid fractures and traumatic elbow instability

The coronoid process is key to concentric elbow alignment. Malalignment can contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The aim of treatment is to keep the joint aligned while the collateral ligaments and fractures heal. The injury pattern is apparent in the shape and size of the coronoid fracture fragments: (1) coronoid tip fractures associated with terrible triad (TT) injuries; (2) anteromedial facet fractures with posteromedial varus rotational type injuries; and (3) large coronoid base fractures with anterior (trans-) or posterior olecranon fracture dislocations. Each injury pattern is associated with specific ligamentous injuries and fracture characteristics useful in planning treatment. The tip fractures associated with TT injuries are repaired with suture fixation or screw fixation in addition to repair or replacement of the radial head fracture and reattachment of the lateral collateral ligament origin. Anteromedial facet fractures are usually repaired with a medial buttress plate. If the elbow is concentrically located on computed tomography and the patient can avoid varus stress for a month, TT and anteromedial facet injuries can be treated nonoperatively. Base fractures are associated with olecranon fractures and can usually be fixed with screws through the posterior plate or with an additional medial plate. If the surgery makes elbow subluxation or dislocation unlikely, and the fracture fixation is secure, elbow motion and stretching can commence within a week when the patient is comfortable.

Conservative versus surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on conservative and surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for published studies by complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the keywords "isolated coronoid fracture," "O'Driscoll type 2 coronoid fracture," "anteromedial coronoid fracture," "anteromedial facet coronoid fracture," "posteromedial rotatory instability," and "varus posteromedial rotatory instability." Patients were divided into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies were assessed to determine each article's quality. The primary outcomes of the present reviews were the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, and the secondary outcomes were associated with complications and reoperations. Eligible trials were independently chosen by two review authors, and a third reviewer resolved all disagreements.

RESULTS

The search yielded 458 records, among which 446 articles were of relevance, and 12 were included. In the final review, 138 patients were evaluated-98 (71%) who received surgical treatment and 40 (29%) who received conservative treatment. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of surgical treatment were 91 and 8, respectively; 69.8% of patients had excellent scores, and 27.0% had good scores. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of conservative treatment were 92 and 12, respectively; 70.6% of patients had excellent scores, and 23.5% had good scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In select cases, conservative treatment can achieve good results in the treatment of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture when a stricter indication is followed. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the appropriate treatment for a particular fracture subtype, and there is a need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials to determine which treatment is superior.

Improved Understanding of Traumatic Complex Elbow Instability

Recent advancements in surgical treatment have improved clinical results in complex traumatic elbow injury. There is increasing recognition that conservative treatment and inadequate surgical fixation carry high risk of substantial morbidity in many of these cases. Recent literature displays improved outcomes in complex elbow instability, in part, because of a more complete comprehension of the injury patterns and fixation methods. Prompt surgical management with stable internal fixation, which permits immediate postoperative mobilization, has been a consistent variable across the reports leading to more satisfactory outcomes. This applies to both acute and chronic cases.

Comparison of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with O'Driscoll type 2 fractures combined with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability and underwent surgery for anteromedial coronoid fracture between August 2014 and March 2019. They were divided into buttress plate (n=16) and cannulated screw (n=11) groups. The elbow range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (DASH) were used for clinical outcome assessment.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the surgical time was significantly shorter in cannulated screw group (85.45±4.156) compared to the buttress plate group (93.81±8.863, P=0.008), and the surgical time was associated with internal fixation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Although there was selection of cases in that small fragments were treated with buttress plate and large fragments with cannulated screw, the buttress plate and cannulated screw have comparable functional outcomes on fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow PMRI. The fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with large fragments using the cannulated screw has a shorter operation time.

Coronoid fixation and lateral collateral ligament repair in varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow

Background

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability is a relatively rare elbow injury, that has been infrequently reported in published literature. We intended to evaluate the outcomes of surgical management of this rare injury with anteromedial coronoid fixation, and, in selected patients, lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2020, we identified 12 patients with anteromedial coronoid fractures, and a varus posteromedial rotatory instability, who underwent surgery for fixation of the coronoid fracture, with or without LCL repair. All the included patients were either O'Driscoll subtype 2-2, or subtype 2-3. All the 12 patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months, and their functional outcomes assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results

The mean MEPS recorded in our study was 92.08, and the mean range of elbow flexion achieved was 124.2°. The mean flexion contracture in our patients was 5.83°. Three of our twelve patients (25%) suffered from elbow stiffness even at final follow-up. The results were graded as Excellent in eight, Good in three, and Fair in one patient.

Conclusion

Coronoid fractures and LUCL disruptions associated with varus posteromedial rotatory instability can be reliably managed by employing a protocol that combines radiographic parameters, as well as intra-operative assessments of stability. While surgical intervention successfully restored stability, there is a learning curve to the management of these injuries and complications are not uncommon, particularly elbow stiffness. Hence, in addition to surgical fixation, emphasis should also be placed on intensive post-operative rehabilitation to improve outcomes.

Results of arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of anteromedial facet coronoid fractures at short-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability is a typical pattern of elbow injury that involves fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid, as well as injuries to the lateral ligament complex and the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament. Some authors support the idea that subtype II AMF coronoid fractures require fixation to restore elbow stability, but this topic is still an issue in the literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) of AMF fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center trial evaluated consecutive patients who underwent ARIF of isolated subtype II AMF coronoid fractures between 2014 and 2020. At the final follow-up, the patients were examined for elbow range of motion, stability, and pain. Injury and post-treatment radiographs were reviewed to assess fracture healing and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (21 male and 11 female patients) with a median age of 47 ± 16 years were included. The average follow-up period was 28 ± 12.4 months. Coronoid process fractures were fixed by cannulated screws in 26 cases (81.25%); in 2 of these cases, additional Kirschner wires were used. Two Kirschner wires were used in 1 case (3.12%), and in the remaining 5 cases (15.62%), osteosuture was used. The lateral ulnar collateral ligament was injured in 27 cases (84.4%) and was always repaired. Other associated lesions were medial collateral ligament injury, osteochondral lesion, and radial head fracture. There were no surgical complications. At the final follow-up, the average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 98.4 ± 2.7 and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.3 ± 1.4. No cases of nonunion were detected on radiographic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although technically demanding, ARIF has several potential advantages in comparison to open surgery: less scarring, a decreased risk of infection, and less postoperative pain.

Classification of coronoid process fractures: A pending question

Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.

Dislocations of the elbow - An instructional review

Dislocations of the elbow require recognition of the injury pattern followed by adequate treatment to allow early mobilisation. Not every injury requires surgery but if surgery is undertaken all structures providing stability should be addressed, including fractures, medial and lateral ligament insertion and the radial head. The current concepts of biomechanical modelling are addressed and surgical implications discussed.