Worsening racial disparities in patients undergoing anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States

Evaluation of new normal after shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Reports of equivalent patient-reported outcomes between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) have contributed to a continued preference of rTSA. Although many surgeons believe that the best aTSA outcome can outperform the best rTSA outcome, this has not yet been demonstrated in the literature. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcome characteristics of aTSA and rTSA patients who perceive that their shoulder is close to normal, with the hypothesis that aTSA patients will outperform rTSA patients.

METHODS

A retrospective query of our institution's data repository from 2006 to 2021 identified primary anatomic and rTSA patients with minimum 2-year follow-up and who have achieved a "new normal," defined as a most recent Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score ≥95. aTSA and rTSA patients were compared based on patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, and satisfaction. Specific patient-reported outcome measure questions representative of higher functional demands were analyzed, and a subset analysis of patients treated for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff was performed.

RESULTS

The query identified 849 aTSA and 745 rTSA patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Of these, 40% (337) of aTSA and 26% (193) of rTSA patients reached a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score ≥95 at most recent follow-up. aTSA significantly outperformed rTSA in total American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P < .001); ability to reach a high shelf (P < .001), lift 10 pounds (P < .001), and perform usual work and usual sport (P < .001); total Simple Shoulder Test score (P < .001); ability to lift 8 pounds and carry 20 pounds (P < .001); and range of motion including clinician measured elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation (P < .001). A subanalysis among patients treated for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff produced similar results, with aTSA patients outperforming rTSA patients in many higher demand functions.

CONCLUSION

aTSA patients have a 40% chance of perceiving their shoulder as normal. Among shoulder arthroplasty patients who perceive their shoulder as normal, aTSA patients outperform rTSA patients with better motion and greater ability to return to work, return to sport, and perform higher demand activities without difficulty.

Patient race and ethnicity are associated with higher unplanned 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions but not 10-year all-cause complications or reoperations: a matched cohort analysis of primary shoulder arthroplasties

Background

Within orthopedic surgery, there remain limited data evaluating the impact of racial and socioeconomic disparities on outcomes of primary shoulder arthroplasty (SA) over time. As such, we analyzed both short- and longer-term outcome differences in complications, reoperations, and revision surgery of primary SA when performed in non-White patients when compared to a matched cohort of White patients who had undergone SA.

Methods

Over a 39-year period (1981-2020), an institutional Total Joint Registry Database was utilized to identify all non-White patients (Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic or Latino, American Indian/Alaska Native, other) who underwent primary SA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The search identified 275 primary SA (46 hemiarthroplasties, 97 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, and 132 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties). The ethnicity composition was 8.7% Asian, 27.3% Black, 37.8% Hispanic, 12.4% American Indian, and 13.8% other. This cohort was matched 1:2 according to age, sex, diagnosis, implant, and surgical year to a control group of 550 White patients who had undergone SA. The rates of medical and surgical complications, reoperations, revisions, and implant survivorship were assessed. The mean follow-up time was 6.3 years (range, 2 to 40 years).

Results

Comparisons between the non-White and White matched cohorts demonstrated a higher rate of tobacco use (14.2% vs. 10.5%; P < .001), diabetes (21.5% vs. 11.8%; P < .001), length of stay (1.9 vs. 1.6 days; P = .014), and a lower rate of private commercial insurance (27.3% vs. 44.5%; P < .001 in the non-White cohort. Within the first 90 days after surgery, non-White patients had a higher rate of emergency department visits (5.5% vs. 0.9%; P < .001) and unplanned readmissions (2.9% vs. 0.7%; P = .014). After the first 90 postoperative days, there were no differences regarding medical (1.8% vs. 0.7%; P = .135) or surgical complications (12.0% vs. 13.6%; P = .446). Ten-year survivorship free of all-cause complication (76.8% vs. 81.5%; P = .370), reoperation (84.9% vs. 89.8%; P = .492), and revision (89.3% vs. 91.4%; P = .715) were similar between the non-White and White cohorts.

Discussion

After accounting for age, sex, and surgical indication, patient race and ethnicity were not associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause complications, reoperations, or revision surgery after primary SA. However, within the first 90 postoperative days, non-White patients had a higher likelihood of unplanned emergency room visits and readmissions.

Patient Health Care Disparities in Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is an effective surgical procedure to treat advanced degenerative conditions of the shoulder as well as tumors or fractures of the proximal humerus. Utilization of SA is increasing in the United States as indications have expanded, however, health care disparities around utilization and clinical outcomes following SA also exist. This review examines current literature on patient related health care disparities in SA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Within SA, patient related health care disparities are highly influenced by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geography, and patient sex. Short term clinical outcomes show that Non-White patients experience lower utilization of SA, longer hospital stays, higher complications, and increased readmissions. Sex related disparities demonstrate that female patients have a longer interval between initial consultation and surgery. Additionally, females experience lower functional scores and higher rates of perioperative fractures than males. In the current era of value-based care, wide disparities in early postoperative outcomes increase the cost of healthcare to both patients and health systems. Disparities in SA remain underexplored compared to other health topics. Existing literature highlights suboptimal outcomes in racially, ethnically, or socially disadvantaged groups. Active awareness and recognition of healthcare disparities are required to renew and strengthen initiatives to deliver more equitable care after SA.

The impact of gender on outcomes following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty is a highly effective intervention for treating pain and dysfunction of the shoulder. Previous studies have suggested worse postoperative outcomes in women compared to men. This study aims to examine the impact of gender on pain and functional outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review from January 2007 to September 2022 was conducted on all-cause total shoulder replacement by 4 fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at a single level 1 trauma center. Demographic variables including age, gender, and race were queried. Outcomes of interest included active forward flexion, active external rotation, visual analog scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, as well as readmission and revision rates.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and fifty-six total shoulder arthroplasty cases were reviewed, which included 426 aTSA (mean age 63.5 years, 50.5% female, 82.8% Caucasian) and 530 rTSAs (mean age 69.9 years, 58.5% female, 72.0% Caucasian) with an overall mean follow-up of 5.8 years. When comparing males to females in the aTSA cohort, no significant differences in range of motion emerged. Males did report significantly less pain at 6 months (0.75, P = .044). However, at most recent follow-up, pain and functional outcomes in the aTSA cohort were similar between males and females. No differences were noted for genders with respect to surgery duration (7.7 minutes, P = .153) nor for rates in postoperative readmission (0.017, P = .725) and revision (0.004, P = .824) by 1 year follow-up. When comparing males to females in the rTSA cohort, there were also no significantly different outcomes in range of motion. Additionally, while females reported more preoperative pain (1.14, P = .0064), pain and functional outcomes in the rTSA cohort were similar between males and females postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows minimal gender differences in shoulder arthroplasty outcomes, with both genders achieving similar long-term results in pain relief and function. Overall, outcomes are comparable, suggesting only minor gender-specific factors.

Adoption of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures differs by patient race

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has gained popularity for the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The purpose of this study was to compare racial differences in surgical management of PHF between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, and rTSA. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in fixation by race.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for ORIF, rTSA, and hemiarthroplasty between 2006 and 2020 for patients with a PHF. Race, ethnicity, age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class were recorded. Chi squared tests were performed to assess relationships between patient factors and operative intervention. Factors significant at the 0.10 level in univariable analyses were included in a multivariable multinomial model to predict operative intervention.

RESULTS

Seven thousand four hundred ninety-nine patients underwent surgical treatment for a PHF, including 526 (7%) undergoing hemiarthroplasty, 5011 (67%) undergoing ORIF, and 1962 (26%) undergoing rTSA. 27% of white patients with PHF underwent rTSA compared to 21% of Black patients, 16% of Asian patients, and 14% of Native American and Alaskan Native patients (P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, utilization of rTSA increased over time (OR 1.2 per year since 2006, P < .001) and hemiarthroplasty decreased over time (OR 0.86 per year since 2006, P < .001). Non-White patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing rTSA vs. ORIF (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97), as did male patients (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.88). Patients over 65 (OR 3.86, 95% CI 3.39-4.38), patients with higher ASA classifications (ASA2: OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.86-5.66, ASA3: OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.74-8.32, ASA4: OR 5.25, 95% CI 2.89-9.54), and patients who were overweight (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.55) or obese (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32-1.75) had higher odds of undergoing rTSA vs. ORIF.

DISCUSSION

As utilization of rTSA increases, understanding disparities in surgical treatment of PHF is crucial to improving outcomes and equitable access to emerging orthopedic technologies. While patient factors such as age, body mass index, and comorbidities are known to directly impact outcomes and thus may be predictive of the type of surgical intervention, patient race should not dictate treatment.

The Effect of Race and Social Vulnerability on the Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Introduction Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis is one of the most common hand arthropathies. There is significant variability in treatment, and understanding how race and social vulnerability impact treatment decisions is essential for equitable care. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of race and social vulnerability on the management of patients with thumb CMC osteoarthritis. Methods A retrospective review of 270 patients presenting to one community-based health system for CMC osteoarthritis from December 2014 to February 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, patient-reported outcomes, social vulnerability index (SVI), and Eaton-Littler classification were collected. Patients were classified by race and SVI. The primary outcome of interest was CMC arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes included non-operative treatment and time to surgery. Results On average, non-White patients were younger (p=0.033), had increased BMI (p=0.001), and were more likely females (p=0.002). Additionally, non-White patients were more socially vulnerable overall than White patients (p<0.001). Non-White patients had a higher rate of steroid injection (p=0.018), a lower rate of splinting (p<0.001), and a lower rate of CMC arthroplasty (21.5% vs. 35.6%; p=0.038). On multivariate analysis, non-White patients were 2.17 (p=0.035) times less likely to have CMC arthroplasty than White patients. Conclusions Non-White and higher social vulnerability patients are less likely to receive a splint and proceed to CMC arthroplasty. On multivariate analysis, the White race patients were predictive of CMC arthroplasty. On multivariate analysis, White race patients were associated with increased odds of CMC arthroplasty. These findings highlight the association between socioeconomic and racial factors and treatment decisions, suggesting a need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable care.

Racial Disparities in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in a Medically Underserved Community with a Diverse Population

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated lower total joint arthroplasty utilization rates and worse postoperative outcomes among non-White patients. Our study examined whether these disparities exist in the setting of a diverse population.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with a self-reported race who underwent total knee (TKA) or hip (THA) arthroplasty procedures in a racially diverse county. Patients who did not identify as White or Hispanic/Latino were excluded from the study due to small sample sizes. Demographic, intra and postoperative outcome differences were calculated. A multivariate logistic regression was developed to examine the association between patients' race and undesired postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-five patients were included in our study with 490 identifying as non-Hispanic/Latino White (88.8%) and 65 as Hispanic/Latino (11.2%). Hispanic/Latino-identifying patients were significantly younger (61.9 ± 12.79 versus 68.58 ± 9.00 years), had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and were more likely to use non-Medicare/Medicaid insurance. We observed no differences between our cohorts in postoperative adverse events, emergency department visits, and hospital readmissions. Patients' self-identified race was not correlated with undesired postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Hispanic/Latino-identifying patients constitute 50.2% of the county population of our study cohort, they accounted for only 11.2% of the patients in our study. This is noteworthy considering the lack of evidence suggesting a decreased prevalence of osteoarthritis among individuals of different races and ethnicities. Further, the demographic differences we observed suggest an exclusive Hispanic/Latino patient population utilizing TKA or THA procedures. Future studies controlling for risk factors and less invasive treatment options may explain these disparities.

Racial and ethnic disparity in shoulder surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Health care disparity exists in utilization and delivery of musculoskeletal care and continues to be an obstacle for orthopedic health care providers to mitigate. Racial and ethnic disparities exist within various surgical fields including orthopedic surgery and are expected to continue to rise in upcoming years. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the racial and ethnic disparities on utilization and outcomes after common shoulder surgical procedures.

METHODS

A primary literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases using comprehensive Medical Subject Headings and subject-heading search terms. Studies were included if they reported utilization and or outcomes across 2 or more racial/ethnic groups in patients (age >16) who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), rotator cuff repair (RCR), arthroscopic Bankart repair, Latarjet procedure, and open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture (PHF). Baseline demographics, data on procedure utilization, perioperative measures including mortality, operative time, length of stay, readmission, and complications were extracted from included studies, and descriptive statistical analysis performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified for full text review of which 13 found race and ethnicity as factors affecting utilization and outcomes in TSA, RCR, arthroscopic Bankart repair, Latarjet procedure, and open reduction internal fixation of PHF. Compared to White patients, Black patients were found to have decreased utilization, longer length of stay, and greater operative time and mortality after TSA; Black patients also had longer operative times and time to discharge, and lower levels of reported satisfaction after RCR. Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was reported as an independent risk factor for postoperative falls following TSA. Hispanic/Latino and Black patients have a higher risk of delayed surgery and greater risk of readmission after surgical treatment of PHF compared to patients of White race.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlights the limited literature reporting the existence of racial and ethnic disparities in utilization and outcomes after common shoulder surgical procedures. Additionally, there is a paucity of studies exploring the underlying etiology of racial and ethnic disparity in outcomes after shoulder surgery. More research is necessary to pave the way for evidence-based action plans to mitigate health care disparities after shoulder surgeries, but this review serves as a baseline for where efforts in direct improvement can begin.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in risk and reason for revision total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With the rise of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), revision TSA is also becoming more prominent. However, there is a paucity of literature on potential racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities regarding revision TSA. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk and reason for revision TSA between racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 to identify all patients who underwent primary TSA and revision TSA. The risk of revision was calculated for each racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic group between 2016 and 2020 using the total number of revision and primary TSAs. The reason for revision was also compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

Hispanic patients were 13% less likely to undergo revision TSA than White patients after primary TSA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87). Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients demonstrated similar risks of revision to White patients. Black and Hispanic patients were 48% and 63% less likely to have mechanical complications as the cause of revision than White patients, respectively (OR = 0.52 and 0.37), and Black patients were 5 times more likely to require revision due to osteolysis (OR = 4.8). Risk of revision TSA was similar between socioeconomic groups. Patients of lower socioeconomic status were less likely to require revision due to mechanical complications or osteolysis than patients in the highest income quartile.

CONCLUSION

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in revision TSA, though not to the extent that has previously been investigated in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. Race was predictive of the reason for revision TSA with Black patients undergoing revision for different reasons on average than White patients. The reasons for revision also differed across income quartiles with lowest income quartile patients differing from those in the highest income quartile. Raising awareness and emphasizing the reduction of variability could aid in further decreasing these disparities and alleviating the impact of social determinants of health on revision TSA.

Racial and ethnic disparities in short-stay primary total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

There is a paucity of literature evaluating the utilization of short-stay total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in different racial groups. The purpose of this study is to compare short-stay TSA utilization and postoperative outcomes across racial groups.

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2010 to 2018 to identify patients who underwent primary short-stay TSA, defined as a length of stay of less than 2 midnights. Annual proportions of short-stay TSA, demographic variables, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative complications were compared across groups.

Results

All racial groups showed increases in the proportion of short-stay TSA cases over time, but this increase was most evident in Whites. Hispanics had increased rates of pneumonia (0.8% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.002) and transfusion (2.0% vs 1.0%; p = 0.015) compared to Whites, but no other differences in outcomes were observed between groups.

Discussion

Postoperative outcomes were similar across groups despite differing comorbidity profiles, suggesting that short-stay TSA is being implemented appropriately based on perceived preoperative risk. However, differences in utilization across groups suggest that underlying disparities may exist. Given the continued increase in short-stay TSA procedures, opportunities to resolve racial disparities are essential in mitigating the effects of social determinants of health in minority patient groups.

Racial and gender disparities in utilization of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Utilization in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) has increased significantly in recent years. It remains largely unknown whether utilization of outpatient TSA differs across gender and racial groups. This study aimed to quantify racial and gender disparities both nationally and by geographic regions.

METHODS

168,504 TSAs were identified using Medicare fee-for-service inpatient and outpatient claims data and beneficiary enrollment data from 2020 to 2022Q4. The percentage of outpatient cases, defined as cases discharged on the same day of surgery, was evaluated by racial and gender groups and by different census divisions. A multivariate logistics regression model controlling for patient sociodemographic information (White vs. non-White race, age, gender, and dual eligibility for both Medicare and Medicaid), hierarchical condition category (HCC) score, hospital characteristics, year fixed effects, and patient residency state fixed effects was performed.

RESULTS

The TSA volume per 1000 beneficiaries was 2.3 for the White population compared with 0.8, 0.6, and 0.3 for the Black, Hispanic, and Asian population, respectively. A higher percentage of outpatient TSAs were in White patients (25.6%) compared with Black patients (20.4%) (P < .001). The Black TSA patients were also younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be dually eligible for Medicaid, and had higher HCC risk scores. After controlling for patient sociodemographic characteristics and hospital characteristics, the odds of receiving outpatient TSAs were 30% less for Black than the White group (odds ratio 0.70). Variations were observed across different census divisions, with South Atlantic (0.67, P < .01), East North Central (0.56, P < .001), and Middle Atlantic (0.36, P < .01) being the 4 regions observed with significant racial disparities. Statistically significant gender disparities were also found nationally and across regions, with an overall odds ratio of 0.75 (P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Statistically significant racial and gender disparities were found nationally in outpatient TSAs, with Black patients having 30% (P < .001) fewer odds of receiving outpatient TSAs than White patients, and female patients with 25% (P < .001) fewer odds than male patients. Racial and gender disparities continue to be an issue for shoulder arthroplasties after the adoption of outpatient TSAs.

Telemedicine Use Following Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic Was Associated With Youth and White Race but Not With Socioeconomic Deprivation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Orthopedic Patients

Background

The use of telemedicine increased greatly following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear whether and how sociodemographic factors have affected orthopedics patients' use of this technology in the pandemic.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine how patient demographic variability in telemedicine use is influenced by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and distance to clinical site among patients seeking care for hip and knee arthritis from orthopedic surgeons.

Methods

Demographic data and visit type were collected from the electronic medical record for patients seen in our academic medical center either before or during the COVID-19 pandemic by orthopedic surgeons who specialize in hip and knee arthroplasty. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed regarding age, race, insurance status, ADI, and distance to a clinical site.

Results

In the COVID era, among 4901 visits with 3124 unique patients, those using telemedicine were younger and more likely to be White compared to those who did not use telemedicine. There was no significant difference in telemedicine use based on ADI, distance to a clinical site, or insurance status.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis suggests that orthopedic patients who were White and of younger age were more likely to use telemedicine in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no statistically significant relationship between distance from a clinical site or ADI and telemedicine use, suggesting that factors other than these are greater contributors to telemedicine utilization in our cohort. Further information is needed to determine how telemedicine may disproportionately limit access to orthopedic care according to these and other patient factors.

Relationship Between Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status and Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing volume of neighborhood-level health disparity research, there remains a paucity of prospective studies investigating the relationship between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and functional outcomes for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on patients aged ≥18 years with minimum 1-year follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears. The study population was divided into ADILow and ADIHigh cohorts according to ADI score: a validated measurement of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status standardized to yield a score between 1 and 100. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool, visual analog scale for pain, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. After patients were stratified by ADI score (mean ± SD), the ADILow cohort (n = 113; 5.8 ± 3.0; range, 1-12) and ADIHigh cohort (n = 115; 28.0 ± 14.5; range, 13-97) had no differences in baseline patient demographics. The ADIHigh cohort had significantly worse preoperative baseline scores for all 5 PROMs; however, these differences were not present by 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, the 2 cohorts achieved similar rates of the minimal clinically important difference for all 5 PROMs and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for 4 PROMs. When controlling for patient demographics, patients with higher ADI scores had greater odds of achieving the minimal clinically important difference for all PROMs except the 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool.

CONCLUSION

Although hip arthroscopy patients experiencing a greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage exhibited significantly lower preoperative baseline PROM scores, this disparity resolved at 1-year follow-up. In fact, when adjusting for patient characteristics including ADI score, more disadvantaged patients achieved greater odds of achieving the minimal clinically important difference. The present study is merely a first step toward understanding health inequities among patients seeking orthopaedic care. Further development of clinical guidelines and health policy research is necessary to advance care for patients from disadvantaged communities.

Postoperative racial disparities following spine surgery are less pronounced in the outpatient setting

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Racial disparities in spine surgery have been thoroughly documented in the inpatient (IP) setting. However, despite an increasing proportion of procedures being performed as same-day surgeries, whether similar differences have developed in the outpatient (OP) setting remains to be elucidated.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate racial differences in postoperative outcomes between Black and White patients following OP and IP lumbar and cervical spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent IP or OP microdiscectomy, laminectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR) between 2017 and 2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Thirty-day rates of serious and minor adverse events, readmission, reoperation, nonhome discharge, and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent IP or OP microdiscectomy, laminectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR) between 2017 and 2021 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Disparities between Black and White patients in (1) adverse event rates, (2) readmission rates, (3) reoperation rates, (4) nonhome discharge rates, (5) mortality rates, (6) operative times, and (7) hospital LOS between Black and White patients were measured and compared between IP and OP surgical settings. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential effects of baseline demographic and clinical differences.

RESULTS

Of 81,696 total surgeries, 49,351 (60.4%) were performed as IP and 32,345 (39.6%) were performed as OP procedures. White patients accounted for a greater proportion of IP (88.2% vs 11.8%) and OP (92.7% vs 7.3%) procedures than Black patients. Following IP surgery, Black patients experienced greater odds of serious (OR 1.214, 95% CI 1.077-1.370, p=.002) and minor adverse events (OR 1.377, 95% CI 1.113-1.705, p=.003), readmission (OR 1.284, 95% CI 1.130-1.459, p<.001), reoperation (OR 1.194, 95% CI 1.013-1.407, p=.035), and nonhome discharge (OR 2.304, 95% CI 2.101-2.528, p<.001) after baseline adjustment. Disparities were less prominent in the OP setting, as Black patients exhibited greater odds of readmission (OR 1.341, 95% CI 1.036-1.735, p=.026) but were no more likely than White patients to experience adverse events, reoperation, individual complications, nonhome discharge, or death (p>.050 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial inequality in postoperative complications following spine surgery is evident, however disparities in complication rates are relatively less following OP compared to IP procedures. Further work may be beneficial in elucidating the causes of these differences to better understand and mitigate overall racial disparities within the inpatient setting. These decreased differences may also provide promising indication that progress towards reducing inequality is possible as spine care transitions to the OP setting.

The Association between Race and Extended Length of Stay in Low-energy Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are one of the most common fractures among patients aged 65 years and older, commonly due to low-energy mechanisms. It is essential to identify drivers of increased healthcare utilization in geriatric PHF patients and bring awareness to any disparities in care. Here, we identify factors associated with the likelihood of inpatient admission and prolonged hospital stay among patients aged 65 years and older who sustain PHF due to falls.

METHODS

A national database was used to identify patients aged 65 years and older who suffered proximal humeral fractures due to a fall. Patient factors were analyzed for association with the likelihood of admission and odds of prolonged stay (≥5 days).

RESULTS

In the study period, 75,385 PHF patients who met our inclusion criteria presented to the emergency department and 14,118 (18.7%) were admitted. Black race was significantly associated with decreased odds of admission ( P < 0.001) and increased likelihood of prolonged stay ( P = 0.007) compared with White patients. Patients aged 75 to 84 and 85+ were both more likely to be admitted ( P < 0.001) and experienced a prolonged hospital stay ( P = 0.015). Patients undergoing surgical intervention with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were associated with admission and prolonged length of stay ( P < 0.001). Hospitals in Midwestern ( P < 0.001) and Western ( P < 0.001) regions exhibited lower rates of admission and Northeastern hospitals were associated with prolonged stays ( P = 0.001). Finally, trauma and nonmetropolitan ( P < 0.001) centers were associated with admission.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the notable influence of age and race on the likelihood of hospital admission and prolonged hospital stay. Specifically, Black patients exhibited prolonged hospital stay, which has been associated with lower-quality care, warranting additional exploration. Understanding these demographic and hospital-related factors is essential for optimizing resource allocation and reducing healthcare disparities in the care of PHF patients, especially as the population ages and the incidence of PHF continues to rise.

Racial disparity in postoperative complications following shoulder arthroplasty (SA): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

There has been an emphasis on racial disparities in orthopedic surgery. Recently, literature suggested Black and Hispanic patients at increased risk for adverse outcomes after Shoulder Arthroplasty (SA), but data regarding it is sparse and inconclusive. Therefore, we aim to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the role of racial disparity in causing adverse outcomes after SA.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were queried. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were included. Results were analyzed by pooling Odds ratios along 95% Confidence interval, using random-effects model on RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 14 selected studies evaluated 1,781,783 patients. We found Black patients at higher risk of post-SA complications than White patients (OR 1.32(95% CI 1.25-1.39; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). No significant risk in Hispanics compared to white patients (OR 0.94(95% CI 0.81-1.09); p = 0.41; I2 = 65%). Compared to whites, black patients were at higher risk of an extended length of stay, postoperative blood transfusion, sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and non-home discharge. Compared to white patients, Hispanics were at higher risk for postoperative blood transfusion. Whites showed increased risk for readmission.

Conclusion

Following SA, Black patients were likely to develop complications compared to White patients but no significant risk in Hispanics compared to Whites.

Rotator Cuff Repair: Racial Disparities in Operative Time and Utilization of Arthroscopic Techniques

Background Racial disparities are prevalent within the field of orthopedics and include the utilization of varying resources as well as outcomes following surgery. This study investigates racial differences between Black and White patients in the surgical treatment of rotator cuff repair (RCR) and 30-day postoperative complications following RCR. Materials and methods Data were drawn from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to create a study population consisting of Black and White patients who underwent RCR between 2015 and 2019. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare patient demographics and comorbidities. Multivariate logistic regression, controlling for all significantly linked patient demographics and comorbidities, was performed to examine the relationships between Black race and complications. Results Our analysis included 32,073 patients, of whom 3,318 (10.3%) were Black and 28,755 (89.7%) were White. The female gender, younger age groups, greater BMI groups, ASA classification ≥3, cigarette use, and comorbid congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, and hypertension were all significantly associated with patients who identified as Black. We found no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complications between Black and White patients. Furthermore, Black patients were found to be independently associated with a greater likelihood of undergoing arthroscopic RCR versus open RCR, as well as experiencing a longer total operation time of ≥80 minutes. Conclusions We report no differences in 30-day postoperative complications between Black and White patients undergoing RCR between 2015 and 2019. However, Black race was independently associated with higher rates of arthroscopic RCR and longer operative times.

Differences in total shoulder arthroplasty utilization and 30-day outcomes among White, Black, and Hispanic patients: do disparities exist in the outpatient setting?

BACKGROUND

In the United States, efforts to improve efficiency and reduce healthcare costs are shifting more total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) surgeries to the outpatient setting. However, whether racial and ethnic disparities in access to high-quality outpatient TSA care exist remains to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess racial/ethnic differences in relative outpatient TSA utilization and perioperative outcomes using a large national surgical database.

METHODS

White, Black, and Hispanic patients who underwent TSA between 2017 and 2021 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and rates of outpatient utilization, adverse events, readmission, reoperation, nonhome discharge, and mortality within 30 days of surgery were compared between racial/ethnic groups. Race/ethnicity-specific trends in utilization of outpatient TSA were assessed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for baseline demographic factors and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 21,186 patients were included, consisting of 19,135 (90.3%) White, 1093 (5.2%) Black, and 958 (4.5%) Hispanic patients and representing 17,649 (83.3%) inpatient and 3537 (16.7%) outpatient procedures. Black and Hispanic patients were generally younger and less healthy than White patients, yet incidences of complications, nonhome discharge, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days were similar across groups following outpatient TSA (P > .050 for all). Relative utilization of outpatient TSA increased by 28.7% among White patients, 29.5% among Black patients, and 38.6% among Hispanic patients (ptrend<0.001 for all). Hispanic patients were 64% more likely than White patients to undergo TSA as an outpatient procedure across the study period (OR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.40-1.92, P < .001), whereas odds did not differ between Black and White patients (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.87-1.23, P = .673).

CONCLUSION

Relative utilization of outpatient TSA remains highest among Hispanic patients but has been significantly increasing across all racial and ethnic groups, now accounting for more than one-third of all TSA procedures. Considering outpatient TSA is associated with fewer complications and lower costs, increasing utilization may represent a promising avenue for reducing disparities in orthopedic shoulder surgery.

The Effect of Social Deprivation on Hospital Utilization Following Distal Radius Fracture Treatment

Purpose

Social determinants of health disparities have been shown to adversely impact outcomes following distal radius fracture (DRF) treatment. Identifying risk factors for increased hospital use following DRF has been historically difficult; however, it is of utmost concern to orthopedic surgeons to improve outcomes and decrease the total cost of care. The effect of social deprivation following DRF has yet to be fully investigated.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of a single institution's experience in treating DRF with either an operative or nonsurgical modality between 2005 and 2020. Patient demographic information and health care utilization (hospital readmission, emergency department [ED] visitation, office visits, and telephone use) were collected from within 90 days of treatment. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) national percentiles were recorded. Patients were stratified into terciles based on their relative level of deprivation, and their outcomes were compared. Secondary analyses included stratifying patients based on treatment modality, race, and legal sex.

Results

In total, 2,149 patients were included. The least, intermediate, and most deprived groups consisted of 552, 1,067, and 530 patients, respectively. Risk factors for hospital readmission included higher levels of relative deprivation. Identifying as Black or African American and nonsurgical management were risk factors for increased ED visitation. No differences in rate of hospital readmission, ED visitation, office visitation, or telephone use were seen based on deprivation level.

Conclusions

High levels of social deprivation, treatment modality, race, and legal sex disparities may influence the amount of hospital resource utilization following DRF treatment. Understanding and identifying risk factors for greater resource utilization can help to mitigate inappropriate use and decrease health care costs. We hope to use these findings to guide clinical decision making, educate patient populations, and optimize outcomes following DRF treatment.

Type of Study/Level of Evidence

Therapeutic III.

Evaluating the fairness and accuracy of machine learning-based predictions of clinical outcomes after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML)-based clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) make personalized predictions for different treatments; by comparing predictions of multiple treatments, these tools can be used to optimize decision making for a particular patient. However, CDST prediction accuracy varies for different patients and also for different treatment options. If these differences are sufficiently large and consistent for a particular subcohort of patients, then that bias may result in those patients not receiving a particular treatment. Such level of bias would deem the CDST "unfair." The purpose of this study is to evaluate the "fairness" of ML CDST-based clinical outcomes predictions after anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for patients of different demographic attributes.

METHODS

Clinical data from 8280 shoulder arthroplasty patients with 19,249 postoperative visits was used to evaluate the prediction fairness and accuracy associated with the following patient demographic attributes: ethnicity, sex, and age at the time of surgery. Performance of clinical outcome and range of motion regression predictions were quantified by the mean absolute error (MAE) and performance of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit classification predictions were quantified by accuracy, sensitivity, and the F1 score. Fairness of classification predictions leveraged the "four-fifths" legal guideline from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and fairness of regression predictions leveraged established MCID thresholds associated with each outcome measure.

RESULTS

For both aTSA and rTSA clinical outcome predictions, only minor differences in MAE were observed between patients of different ethnicity, sex, and age. Evaluation of prediction fairness demonstrated that 0 of 486 MCID (0%) and only 3 of 486 substantial clinical benefit (0.6%) classification predictions were outside the 20% fairness boundary and only 14 of 972 (1.4%) regression predictions were outside of the MCID fairness boundary. Hispanic and Black patients were more likely to have ML predictions out of fairness tolerance for aTSA and rTSA. Additionally, patients <60 years old were more likely to have ML predictions out of fairness tolerance for rTSA. No disparate predictions were identified for sex and no disparate regression predictions were observed for forward elevation, internal rotation score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, or global shoulder function.

CONCLUSION

The ML algorithms analyzed in this study accurately predict clinical outcomes after aTSA and rTSA for patients of different ethnicity, sex, and age, where only 1.4% of regression predictions and only 0.3% of classification predictions were out of fairness tolerance using the proposed fairness evaluation method and acceptance criteria. Future work is required to externally validate these ML algorithms to ensure they are equally accurate for all legally protected patient groups.

Evaluating the association between race and complications following pediatric upper extremity surgery

Race can influence perioperative care and outcomes in adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery. However, no prior study has evaluated any associations between race and complications following upper extremity surgery in pediatric patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there are any differences in risks for complications, readmission, or mortality following upper extremity surgery between African American and Caucasian pediatric patients. Pediatric patients who had a primary upper extremity procedure from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: patients who were Caucasian and patients who were African American. Differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between the two-patient population using bivariate and multivariable regression analyses. Of the 25 848 pediatric patients who underwent upper extremity surgeries, 21 693 (83.9%) were Caucasian, and 4155 (16.1%) were African American. Compared to Caucasian patients, African American patients were more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ( P  < 0.001), as well as pulmonary comorbidities ( P  < 0.001) and hematologic disorders ( P  = 0.004). Following adjustment on multivariable regression analysis to control for baseline characteristics, there were no differences in any postoperative complications between Caucasian and African American patients. In conclusion, African American pediatric patients are not at an increased risk for postoperative complications compared to Caucasian patients following upper extremity surgery. Race should not be used independently when evaluating patient risk for postoperative complications. Level of Evidence: III.

Operative management of rotator cuff tears: identifying disparities in access on a national level

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify nationwide disparities in the rates of operative management of rotator cuff tears based on race, ethnicity, insurance type, and socioeconomic status.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with a full or partial rotator cuff tear from 2006 to 2014 were identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. Bivariate analysis using chi-square tests and adjusted, multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate differences in the rates of operative vs. nonoperative management for rotator cuff tears.

RESULTS

This study included 46,167 patients. When compared with white patients, adjusted analysis showed that minority race and ethnicity were associated with lower rates of operative management for Black (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.33; P < .001), Hispanic (AOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.45-0.52; P < .001), Asian or Pacific Islander (AOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.84; P < .001), and Native American patients (AOR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.86; P = .002). In comparison to privately insured patients, our analysis also found that self-payers (AOR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.07-0.10; P < .001), Medicare beneficiaries (AOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.81; P < .001), and Medicaid beneficiaries (AOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.30-0.36; P < .001) had lower odds of receiving surgical intervention. Additionally, relative to those in the bottom income quartile, patients in all other quartiles experienced nominally higher rates of operative repair; these differences were statistically significant for the second quartile (AOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

There are significant nationwide disparities in the likelihood of receiving operative management for rotator cuff tear patients of differing race/ethnicity, payer status, and socioeconomic status. Further investigation is needed to fully understand and address causes of these discrepancies to optimize care pathways.

How using body mass index cutoffs to determine eligibility for total shoulder arthroplasty affects health care disparities

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of obesity in the United States is continuously rising and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Body mass index (BMI) has been used as a risk stratification and counseling tool for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty in an effort to focus on outcome-driven care. Although the use of BMI cutoffs may have benefits in minimizing complications when selecting patients for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), it may impact access to care for some patient populations and further increase disparities. The purpose of this study is to determine the implications of using BMI cutoffs on the eligibility for TSA among different ethnic and gender patient populations.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify 20,872 patients who underwent anatomic and reverse TSA between 2015 and 2019. Patient demographics, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, and BMI, were compared between eligible and ineligible patients based on BMI for 5 cutoff values: 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 kg/m2.

RESULTS

Of the total patient population studied, the mean age was 69 years, 55% were female, and the mean BMI was 31 kg/m2. For all BMI subgroups, there were more ineligible than eligible patients who were female or Black (P < .001). The relative rate of eligibility for Black patients was lower in each BMI cutoff group, whereas the relative rate of eligibility for White and Asian patients was higher for each group. There were more eligible than ineligible Asian patients for BMI cutoffs of 30 and 35 kg/m2 (both P < .001), and there were no differences in eligibility and ineligibility in Hispanic patients (P > .05). Furthermore, White patients were more eligible than ineligible for all BMI cutoff groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Enforcing BMI cutoffs for access to TSA may limit the procedure for female or Black patients for all BMI cutoffs, thus furthering the health care disparities these populations already face. However, there are more eligible than ineligible White patients for all BMI cutoff groups, which indicates a disparity in the access to TSA based on sex and race. Physicians may inadvertently increase health care disparities observed in TSA if they use BMI as the sole risk stratification tool for patients, even though BMI has been known to increase complications after TSA. Moreover, orthopedic surgeons should only use BMI as one of many factors in a more holistic process when determining if a patient should undergo TSA.

Racial disparities in readmission rates following surgical treatment of pediatric developmental dysplasia of the hip

PURPOSE

Across orthopedic subspecialties, significant racial disparities have been identified with regard to postoperative outcomes. Despite these findings among adult patients, the literature assessing these disparities within pediatric orthopedics is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the independent predictors for unplanned readmission following surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

METHODS

Pediatric patients undergoing hip dysplasia surgery from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Two patient groups were defined: patients who had unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery and patients who were not readmitted. Clinical characteristics assessed included gender, race, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Risk factors for complications were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 6561 pediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment for hip dysplasia, 540 (8.2%) had unplanned readmission. On bivariate analysis, non-white race (Black, Asian, Hispanic, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian), an ASA class of III, IV, or V, pulmonary, renal, neurological, and gastrointestinal comorbidities, as well as immune disease, steroid use, and nutritional support were significantly associated with unplanned readmission (p < 0.05 for all). After controlling for confounding variables on multivariate analysis, non-white race (OR 1.46; p = 0.042) and ASA class of III-V (OR 2.21; p = 0.002) were found to be independent predictors for readmission.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be advised of the increased readmission rates observed in non-white patients and those of higher ASA scores. Further work is needed to combat existing disparities within pediatric orthopedics.

Disparities in postoperative total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes between Black and White patients

Background

Despite the rise in surgical volume for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures, racial disparities exist in outcomes between White and Black populations. The purpose of this study was to compare 30-day postoperative complication rates between Black and White patients following TSA.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients who underwent TSA between 2015 and 2019. Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared between cohorts using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for all significantly associated patient demographics and comorbidities, was used to identify associations between Black or African American race and postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 19,733 patients were included in the analysis, 18,669 (94.6%) patients in the White cohort and 1064 (5.4%) patients in the Black or African American cohort. Demographics and comorbidities that were significantly associated with Black or African American race were age 40-64 years (P < .001), body mass index ≥40 (P < .001), female gender (P < .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3 (P < .001), smoking status (P < .001), non-insulin and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (P < .001), hypertension requiring medication (P < .001), disseminated cancer (P = .040), and operative duration ≥129 minutes (P = .002). Multivariate logistic regression identified Black or African American race to be independently associated with higher rates of readmission (odds ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.94; P = .025).

Conclusion

Black or African American race was independently associated with higher rates of 30-day readmission following TSA.

National Patterns in Utilization of Knee and Hip Arthroscopy: An Analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in the United States

Background

Racial and ethnic disparities in the field of orthopaedic surgery have been reported extensively across many subspecialties. However, these data remain relatively sparse in orthopaedic sports medicine, especially with respect to commonly performed procedures including knee and hip arthroscopy.

Purpose

To assess (1) differences in utilization of knee and hip arthroscopy between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients in the United States (US) and (2) how these differences vary by geographical region.

Study Design

Descriptive epidemiology study.

Methods

The study sample was acquired from the 2019 National Ambulatory Surgery Sample database. Racial and ethnic differences in age-standardized utilization rates of hip and knee arthroscopy were calculated using survey weights and population estimates from US census data. Poisson regression was used to model age-standardized utilization rates for hip and knee arthroscopy while controlling for several demographic and clinical variables.

Results

During the study period, rates of knee arthroscopy utilization among White patients were significantly higher than those of Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients (ie, per 100,000, White: 180.5, Black: 113.2, Hispanic: 122.2, and Asian: 58.6). Disparities were even more pronounced among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, with White patients receiving the procedure at almost 4 to 5 times higher rates (ie, per 100,000, White: 12.6, Black: 3.2, Hispanic: 2.3, Asian or Pacific Islander: 1.8). Disparities in knee and hip arthroscopy utilization between White and non-White patients varied significantly by region, with gaps in knee arthroscopy being most pronounced in the Midwest (adjusted rate ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.9-2.1]) and those in hip arthroscopy being greatest in the West (adjusted rate ratio, 5.3 [95% CI, 4.9-5.6]).

Conclusion

Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of knee and hip arthroscopy were found across the US, with decreased rates among Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients compared with White patients. Disparities were most pronounced in the Midwest and South and greater for hip than knee arthroscopy, possibly demonstrating emerging inequality in a rapidly growing and evolving procedure across the country.

Influence of Race on Utilization and Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that utilization and outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty vary by sociodemographic factors, highlighting disparities in care. This systematic review synthesized all available literature regarding the relationship between utilization and outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty and race/ethnicity.

METHODS

Studies were identified using PubMed, MEDLINE (through Ovid), and CINAHL databases. All English language studies of Level I through IV evidence that specifically evaluated utilization and/or outcomes of hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, or reverse shoulder arthroplasty by race and/or ethnicity were included. Outcomes of interest included rates of utilization, readmission, reoperation, revision, and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Since the 1990s, Black and Hispanic patients have demonstrated a lower utilization rate of shoulder arthroplasty compared with White patients. Although utilization has increased among all racial groups throughout the present decade, the rate of increase is greater for White patients. These differences persist in both low-volume and high-volume centers and are independent of insurance status. Compared with White patients, Black patients have a longer postoperative length of stay after shoulder arthroplasty, worse preoperative and postoperative range of motion, a higher likelihood of 90-day emergency department visits, and a higher rate of postoperative complications including venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, and sepsis. Patient-reported outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's score, did not differ between Black and White patients. Hispanics had a significantly lower revision risk compared with White patients. One-year mortality did not differ significantly between Asians, Black patients, White patients, and Hispanics.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroplasty utilization and outcomes vary by race and ethnicity. These differences may be partly due to patient factors such as cultural beliefs, preoperative pathology, and access to care, as well as provider factors such as cultural competence and knowledge of health care disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Best MJ, Fedorka CJ, Belniak RM, Haas DA, Zhang X, Armstrong AD, Abboud JA, Jawa A, O'Donnell EA, Simon JE, Wagner ER, Malik M, Gottschalk MB, Khan AZ, Updegrove GF, Makhni EC, Warner JJP, Srikumaran U. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on racial disparities in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to assess racial disparities in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in the United States and to determine whether these disparities were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 100% sample was used to examine primary TSA volume from April to December from 2019 to 2020. Utilization was assessed for White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian populations to determine if COVID-19 affected these groups differently. A regression model adjusted for age, sex, CMS-hierarchical condition categories (HCC) score, dual enrollment (proxy for socioeconomic status), time-fixed effects, and core-based statistical area fixed effects was used to study difference across groups.

Results

In 2019, the TSA volume per 1000 beneficiaries was 1.51 for White and 0.57 for non-White, with a 2.6-fold difference. In 2020, the rate of TSA in White patients (1.30/1000) was 2.9 times higher than non-White (0.45/1000) during the COVID-19 pandemic (P < .01). There was an overall 14% decrease in TSA volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries in 2020; non-White patients had a larger percentage decrease in TSA volume than White (21% vs. 14%, estimated difference; 8.7%, P = .02). Black patients experienced the most pronounced disparity with estimated difference of 10.1%, P = .05, compared with White patients. Similar disparities were observed when categorizing procedures into anatomic and reverse TSA, but not proximal humerus fracture.

Conclusions

During the COVID-19 pandemic, overall TSA utilization decreased by 14% with White patients experiencing a decrease of 14%, and non-White patients experiencing a decrease of 21%. This trend was observed for elective TSA, while disparities were less apparent for proximal humerus fracture.

Race and Ethnicity Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Upper-Extremity Journals

PURPOSE

Hand surgery remains one of the least racially and ethnically diverse subspecialties in all of medicine, and minority patients demonstrate overall worse health care outcomes compared with White patients. Our purpose was to determine the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals with an upper-extremity (UE) focus.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs contained in peer-reviewed journals with an UE focus. All articles from 2000 to 2021 were included. Information such as article sample size, center type, funding, and location was recorded. We assessed each article to determine whether demographic information, including race and ethnicity, was reported for study participants.

RESULTS

A total of 481 RCTs in 9 UE journals were included. For UE RCTs, 96% of studies reported age, 90% reported sex, and 5% reported either race or ethnicity. Demographic information about economic status, insurance status, mental health, educational level, and marital status were each reported in <10% of RCTs. Racial representation was highest for White participants (80%) and lowest among American Indian participants. Of studies conducted within the United States, all racial groups except for White patients were underrepresented compared with census data.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic data related to race and ethnicity for patients involved in UE RCTs are infrequently reported. When reported, the racial demographics of UE RCT patients do not match the demographics of the patients in United States. Black patients remain underrepresented in RCTs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Academic journals mandating the reporting of demographic data related to race may aid in improved reporting and allow for subsequent aggregation within systematic reviews to assess outcomes for racial minorities.

Perioperative risk stratification tools for shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification tools are being increasingly utilized to guide patient selection for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to identify the existing calculators used to predict discharge disposition, postoperative complications, hospital readmissions, and patient candidacy for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty and to compare the specific components used to generate their prediction models.

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and OVID Medline were searched for studies that developed calculators used to determine patient candidacy for outpatient surgery or predict discharge disposition, the risk of postoperative complications, and hospital readmissions after anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, and studies including hemiarthroplasty cases were excluded. Data extracted included authors, year of publication, study design, patient population, sample size, input variables, comorbidities, method of validation, and intended purpose. The pros and cons of each calculator as reported by the respective authors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven publications met inclusion criteria. Three tools assessed patient candidacy for outpatient TSA, 3 tools evaluated the risk of 30- or 90-day hospital readmission and postoperative complications, and 5 tools predicted discharge destination. Four calculators validated previously constructed comorbidity indices used as risk predictors after shoulder arthroplasty, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, modified Frailty Index, and the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment, while 7 developed newcalculators. Nine studies utilized multiple logistic regression to develop their calculators, while 1 study developed their algorithm based on previous literature and 1 used univariate analysis. Five tools were built using data from a single institution, 2 using data pooled from 2 institutions, and 4 from large national databases. All studies used preoperative data points in their algorithms with one tool additionally using intraoperative data points. The number of inputs ranged from 5 to 57 items. Four calculators assessed psychological comorbidities, 3 included inputs for substance use, and 1 calculator accounted for race.

CONCLUSION

The variation in perioperative risk calculators after TSA highlights the need for standardization and external validation of the existing tools. As the use of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty increases, these calculators may become outdated or require revision. Incorporation of socioeconomic and psychological measures into these calculators should be investigated.

Proteomic changes associated with racial background and sepsis survival outcomes

Intra-abdominal infection is a common cause of sepsis, and intra-abdominal sepsis leads to ∼156 000 U.S. deaths annually. African American/Black adults have higher incidence and mortality rates from sepsis compared to Non-Hispanic White adults. A limited number of studies have traced survival outcomes to molecular changes; however, these studies primarily only included Non-Hispanic White adults. Our goal is to better understand molecular changes that may contribute to differences in sepsis survival in African American/Black and Non-Hispanic White adults with primary intra-abdominal infection. We employed discovery-based plasma proteomics of patient samples from the Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) cohort (N = 107). We identified 49 proteins involved in the acute phase response and complement system whose expression levels are associated with both survival outcome and racial background. Additionally, 82 proteins differentially-expressed in survivors were specific to African American/Black or Non-Hispanic White patients, suggesting molecular-level heterogeneity in sepsis patients in key inflammatory pathways. A smaller, robust set of 19 proteins were in common in African American/Black and Non-Hispanic White survivors and may represent potential universal molecular changes in sepsis. Overall, this study identifies molecular factors that may contribute to differences in survival outcomes in African American/Black patients that are not fully explained by socioeconomic or other non-biological factors.

Racial disparities in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: an analysis of utilization and perioperative outcomes

Background

There remains a paucity of literature addressing racial disparities in utilization and perioperative metrics in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to evaluate patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2010 to 2019. Baseline demographics, utilization trends, and perioperative measures, including adverse events, operative time, length of hospital stay, days from operation to discharge, and readmission, were analyzed.

Results

Of 42,443 included patients, 38,090 (89.7%) were White, and 4353 (10.3%) were Black or African American. Black or African American patients had a significantly higher percentage of diabetes mellitus (23.6% vs. 15.6%), smoking (16.9% vs. 14.8%), congestive heart failure (0.3% vs. 0.1%), and hypertension (59.2% vs. 45.9%). In addition, logistic regression showed that Black or African American patients had increased odds of longer operative time (adjusted rate ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.08) and time from operation to discharge (adjusted rate ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.37). Disparities in relative utilization decreased as the proportion of Black or African American patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair increased (7.4% in 2010 vs. 10.4% in 2019) compared with White patients (P _trend < .0001).

Conclusion

Racial disparities exist regarding baseline comorbidities and perioperative metrics in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Further investigation is needed to fully understand and address the causes of these inequalities to provide equitable care.

Duration of Care and Operative Time Are the Primary Drivers of Total Charges After Ambulatory Hip Arthroscopy: A Machine Learning Analysis

PURPOSE

To develop a machine learning algorithm to predict total charges after ambulatory hip arthroscopy and create a risk-adjusted payment model based on patient comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the New York State Ambulatory Surgery and Services database was performed to identify patients who underwent elective hip arthroscopy between 2015 and 2016. Features included in initial models consisted of patient characteristics, medical comorbidities, and procedure-specific variables. Models were generated to predict total charges using 5 algorithms. Model performance was assessed by the root-mean-square error, root-mean-square logarithmic error, and coefficient of determination. Global variable importance and partial dependence curves were constructed to show the impact of each input feature on total charges. For performance benchmarking, the best candidate model was compared with a multivariate linear regression using the same input features.

RESULTS

A total of 5,121 patients were included. The median cost after hip arthroscopy was $19,720 (interquartile range, $12,399-$26,439). The gradient-boosted ensemble model showed the best performance (root-mean-square error, $3,800 [95% confidence interval, $3,700-$3,900]; logarithmic root-mean-square error, 0.249 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.26]; R² = 0.73). Major cost drivers included total hours in facility less than 12 or more than 15, longer procedure time, performance of a labral repair, age younger than 30 years, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) of 1 or greater, African American race, residence in extreme urban and rural areas, and higher household and neighborhood income.

CONCLUSIONS

The gradient-boosted ensemble model effectively predicted total charges after hip arthroscopy. Few modifiable variables were identified other than anesthesia type; nonmodifiable drivers of total charges included duration of care less than 12 hours or more than 15 hours, operating room time more than 100 minutes, age younger than 30 years, performance of a labral repair, and ECI greater than 0. Stratification of patients based on the ECI highlighted the increased financial risk borne by physicians via flat reimbursement schedules given variable degrees of comorbidities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Disparities in Telemedicine Utilization During COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Demographic Data from a Large Academic Orthopaedic Practice

The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted a shift in health-care provision toward implementation of telemedicine. This study investigated demographic information on orthopaedic telemedicine utilization at a single academic orthopaedic institution in an effort to identify factors associated with telemedicine usage.

Racial disparities in outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A propensity score matched analysis using multiple national data sets

BACKGROUND

Disparities in access, utilization and outcomes exist throughout the healthcare system for minority groups, including racial and ethnic minorities; these disparities have wide-reaching implications for individuals as well as the healthcare system as a whole. This study will examine the impact of race on short and medium term outcomes for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR) using matched cohorts.

METHODS

Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2016 to 2018 were extracted from two national databases: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) and TriNetX Research Network. Using the ACS-NSQIP database, univariate analysis was performed to identify differences in comorbidities between white and minority patients. Patients were propensity score matched based on significant differences between groups and 30-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. These comorbidities were then used to propensity score match white and minority patients in the TriNetX database and two-year postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Following propensity score matching, 3716 patients remained in each group from the ACS-NSQIP database and 4185 patients remained in each group from the TriNetX database. The OR time for minority patients was longer than white patient in the ACS-NSQIP database (92.2 vs. 87.6 min, p < .001). There was no difference in medium-term outcomes for repeat RCR, infection or frozen shoulder between white and minority patients in the TriNetX database.

CONCLUSION

After propensity score matching the only significant short-term outcome between white and minority patients undergoing RCR was a difference in OR time; there were no differences in medium-term outcomes. This may indicate that the source of racial disparities is one of access to healthcare rather than an innate difference in the patients' outcomes. Further study is needed to elucidate this issue.

Racial and Gender Shoulder Arthroplasty Utilization Disparities of High- and Low-Volume Centers in New York State

Introduction

The literature has consistently demonstrated utilization disparities in joint replacement procedures, though no studies have evaluated disparities in total shoulder arthroplasty with regard to operative volume.

Methods

We queried the New York (NY) Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database for 32 410 total shoulder arthroplasties performed between 2009 and 2017. Patients were identified using Clinical Classifications Software code 154 for Non-Hip/Knee Arthroplasty and All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group code 322 for Shoulder. Racial groups included Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Other. High-volume centers were facilities that performed 2 standard deviations above the mean annual procedures. Utilization rates were calculated by dividing total shoulder arthroplasties per group by the 2010 NY Census population of that group. The Fisher exact test was used to determine significance.

Results

Total shoulder arthroplasty utilization increased from 43/100 000 to 73/100 000, two-thirds of which was driven by an increase in white resident utilization. More White residents per 100 000 underwent shoulder arthroplasty than Black, Hispanic, and Other residents per 100 000 residents of their respective race. White residents were 90% more likely than Hispanic residents to undergo total shoulder arthroplasty at high-volume centers (P = .04). There were no differences in utilization rate regarding operative volume comparing Black or Other residents to White residents. More females underwent total shoulder arthroplasty than males, though there was no difference in utilization rate regarding operative volume.

Conclusion

Though total shoulder arthroplasty utilization nearly doubled, disparities persisted across gender and minority groups particularly in Hispanic utilization as White residents were 90% more likely than Hispanic residents to undergo shoulder arthroplasty at high-volume centers.

Regional Implicit Bias Does Not Account for Racial Disparity in Total Joint Arthroplasty Utilization

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities surrounding the utilization of total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) are well documented. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a validated tool used to measure implicit and explicit bias. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if variations in IAT scores by geographical region in the United States (US) correspond with regional variations in THA and TKA utilization by blacks compared to whites.

METHODS

Data from the US Census and National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2014 were used to calculate THA and TKA utilization rates among Medicare-aged blacks and whites. Data were aggregated by US Census Bureau Division. Regional implicit bias was assessed by calculating a weighted average of IAT scores for each division.

RESULTS

Across all geographic regions and years, the surveyed population demonstrated an implicit bias favoring whites over blacks. The population adjusted ratio of white-to-black utilization of THA and TKA by geographic division varied between 0.86-1.85 and 0.87-2.01, respectively. The difference in utilization between geographic divisions reached statistical significance (P < .001). No correlation was found between the IAT scores and race-specific utilization ratios among geographic divisions.

CONCLUSION

Implicit bias as measured by regional IAT did not reflect THA and TKA utilization disparities. The racial disparity in utilization of THA and TKA significantly varied between divisions. The observed disparity was greater in divisions with a relatively higher proportion of blacks. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of implicit bias on utilization of THA and TKA.

Complications After Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty: Revisiting Leading Causes of Failure

For practicing shoulder arthroplasty surgeons, it is advisable to consider a breadth of data sources concerning complications and outcomes. Although published series from high-volume centers are the primary source of data, these results may not be generalizable to a wide range of practice settings. National or health system-specific registry and medical device databases are useful adjuncts to assess the changing complication profile of shoulder arthroplasty, as well as to understand the complications specific to certain implants or implant types. To reduce the risk of postoperative complications, surgeons must have a clear understanding of the most common modes of failure.

Hybrid fixation in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: surgical technique and review of the literature

Hybrid constructs have been used as a primary fixation technique in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for more than a decade. A highly porous metal central peg, metal cage, or coatings attached to the surface of cemented polyethylene glenoid component have been used with the concept of providing an additional adjunct in promoting osseointegration, preventing glenoid component loosening, and promoting longer-term success. The purpose of this article is to analyze the published results, complications, as well as rate of revision using this form of glenoid fixation. In addition, key aspects of the surgical technique that may be considered to facilitate optimal results when hybrid fixation is considered in total shoulder arthroplasty are also reviewed.

Factors Influencing Appropriate Implant Selection and Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has increased in popularity and has provided improved but somewhat variable results. These variable outcomes may be related to many factors, including implant design, component positioning, specific indication, and patient anatomy. The original Grammont design provided a solution to the high failure rate at the time but was found to have a high rate of scapular notching and poor restoration of rotation. Modern lateralized designs are more consistent in reducing scapular notching while improving range of motion, especially in regards to external rotation. This review article summarizes the effects of modern reverse shoulder prostheses on outcomes.