Video-Based Patient Education Improves Patient Attitudes Toward Resident Participation in Outpatient Surgical Care

A Comparison of Early Complication Rates of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release With and Without Resident Involvement

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rates of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) relative to orthopedic resident trainee involvement in the procedure.

METHODS

All patients undergoing isolated, elective ECTR by two attending surgeons within a 59-month period were analyzed. Cases were categorized as the following according to the degree of resident involvement: ECTR performed by attending with either no resident or a resident as an assistant (group 1), resident performing a portion of the procedure (group 2), and resident performing the entire procedure (group 3). Early postoperative complications and/or intraoperative conversion to an open procedure were the outcomes of interest. We used a noninferiority design, hypothesizing that resident involvement would not be associated with inferior outcomes compared with cases without resident involvement. Multiple logistic regression models, adjusted for patient demographic and surgical characteristics, were fit to assess the relationship between resident involvement groups and complication/conversion outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1,167 ECTR cases (895 patients) were performed and returned for postoperative follow-up for at least 2 weeks after surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter for group 1 cases versus group 2 and 3 cases. The early postoperative complication and conversion rates were 1.7% and 1.0%, respectively. Superficial infection (1.2%), deep infection (0.3%), and transient neuropraxia (0.3%) occurred infrequently and did not differ relative to resident involvement. No differences in the odds of complication and/or conversion relative to resident involvement were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of ECTR performed entirely or in part by attending-supervised resident trainees were not inferior to ECTR performed by an attending surgeon regarding the odds of experiencing complications or conversion to an open procedure. With appropriate supervision, ECTR can be performed safely by orthopedic and plastic surgery residents.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Analysis of the Perception and Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Through Social Media: An Observational Study of the Top 100 Viral TikTok Videos

BACKGROUND

 TikTok is a popular platform that can be used for medical insights. However, spreading inaccurate information about diagnosing or treating medical conditions can undermine the quality of patient care. Our assessment focused on the discourse surrounding knee osteoarthritis on TikTok, with two primary objectives: 1) identifying the creators behind osteoarthritis-related content, and 2) examining whether a connection exists between the reach of video content and the strength of recommendations provided.

METHODS

 The top 100 TikTok videos were chosen based on likes on March 29, 2023. Posts were identified using the hashtag ("#Osteoarthritis"). Videos were classified by the following: number of likes, comments, shares, date of upload, uploader (medical professional, non-medical professional, or business), and video content (medical treatment, home remedy, personal story). Treatments were rated according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for Osteoarthritis using the strength of evidence criteria (1-4 stars). Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

 Among the top videos, 67.7% were uploaded by medical professionals. Private companies, despite having the highest average likes (29,681.2) and shares (1,367.5) per video, had a limited average evidence strength of 2.13. Physician-created videos had the second-highest average number of likes (25,440.1) and shares (1,224.5) per video with a strength of evidence of 3.03. Non-medical professional videos had the lowest evidence support (0.89). Medical treatments, the most liked and shared content, had the lowest evidence strength (1). There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of likes (p=0.808), comments (p=0.647), or shares (p=0.439) to the strength of evidence regarding the intervention.

DISCUSSION

 TikTok can be unreliable for knee osteoarthritis treatment information. It is common to find non-physicians sharing medical advice on the platform, with medical treatments demonstrating the weakest level of supporting evidence. Orthopaedic surgeons should advise their patients that TikTok treatment recommendations may not align with established guidelines.

Patient Perceptions of Resident Involvement in Surgery: A Qualitative Study Using Surgical Video

OBJECTIVE

To improve patient-centered perioperative informed consent, this study used real surgical footage to identify key topics which might be discussed with patients regarding resident involvement in surgery.

DESIGN

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 27 participants. The interviews included a video showing an attending and resident performing a procedure together. Questions focused on comfort with resident involvement and preferences regarding preoperative informed consent. Participants also described residents' participation in their own words.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from the infusion room of the allergy clinic and the treatment room of the dialysis clinic at a tertiary care facility in Nashville, TN (Vanderbilt University Medical Center).

PARTICIPANTS

Adult medical patients were recruited via periodic verbal announcements by the interviewer in the waiting rooms. Purposive sampling was used to increase demographic diversity. Participants with training in the clinical health professions (i.e., physicians, nurses, and medical assistants) were excluded.

RESULTS

Before watching the video, roughly half of participants imagined the resident to have a passive, bystander role, while the remaining imagined a more active role. Despite these differences, most participants found the video of attending-resident teamwork to be a reassuring depiction of resident involvement. When asked the best way to describe resident participation depicted in the video to patients, participants emphasized the need to focus on attending supervision, teamwork, reassurance, as well as resident presence, specific activities, and experience.

CONCLUSION

Although patients have varying perceptions regarding the role of trainees in surgery, most participants were comfortable with teamwork between an attending and resident, as depicted in the video. Our participants provided multiple practical ways to transparently articulate resident involvement for testing in future research.

The Role of Recipient Characteristics in Health Video Communication Outcomes: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The importance of effective communication during public health emergencies has been highlighted by the World Health Organization, and it has published guidelines for effective communication in such situations. With video being a popular medium, video communication has been a growing area of study over the past decades and is increasingly used across different sectors and disciplines, including health. Health-related video communication gained momentum during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and video was among the most frequently used modes of communication worldwide. However, although much research has been done regarding different characteristics of video content (the message) and its delivery (the messenger), there is a lack of knowledge about the role played by the characteristics of the recipients for the creation of effective communication.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to identify how health video communication outcomes are shaped by recipient characteristics, as such characteristics might affect the effectiveness of communication. The main research question of the study is as follows: do the characteristics of the recipients of health videos affect the outcomes of the communication?

METHODS

A scoping review describing the existing knowledge within the field was conducted. We searched for literature in 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) and defined eligibility criteria based on the relevance to the research question. Recipient characteristics and health video communication outcomes were identified and classified.

RESULTS

Of the 1040 documents initially identified, 128 (12.31%) met the criteria for full-text assessment, and 39 (3.75%) met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported 56 recipient characteristics and 42 communication outcomes. The reported associations between characteristics and outcomes were identified, and the potential research opportunities were discussed. Contributions were made to theory development by amending the existing framework of the Integrated-Change model, which is an integrated model of motivational and behavioral change.

CONCLUSIONS

Although several recipient characteristics and health video communication outcomes were identified, there is a lack of robust empirical evidence on the association between them. Further research is needed to understand how the preceding characteristics of the recipients might affect the various outcomes of health video communication.

Patients' Perceptions of Residents Involved in Their Care in a Community General Surgery Practice

BACKGROUND

Resident involvement in patient care in the general surgery setting is most often encountered in an academic setting. Many community hospitals have residents involved in patient care as well. There are no studies that gauge patients' perceptions in the involvement of residents in their general surgery care in the community setting.

METHODS

Patients were given a Northeast Georgia Health System Graduate Medical Education Department Institutional review Board approved 26-question questionnaire during their office visit gauging their wiliness to allow a resident be involved in their care, and their understanding of what a resident is.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients completed the survey with answers that could be analyzed. Overall, 67.3% would allow residents be involved in their care. The main reasons for this were to educate future surgeons, they enjoy a teaching environment, and that they have had residents involved in their care and it was a good experience. Of the 27 % that did not want a resident involved in their care, the main reason was they only wanted their doctor involved in their care. Of the respondents, 58 % were comfortable having a resident involved in their surgery or procedure. Only 14% noted that they would prefer not to have a resident involved in their procedure or surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patents appear receptive to general surgery residents' involvement in their care in the community setting. This is reassuring as community practices may be more receptive to including residents in their practices, based upon these findings.

Independent Operating by General Surgery Residents: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical resident autonomy during training is paramount to independent practice. We sought to determine prevalence of general surgery resident autonomy for surgeries commonly performed on emergency general surgery services and identify trends with time.

DESIGN

We queried ACS-NSQIP for patients undergoing one of 7 emergency general surgery operations. We evaluated trends in independent operating (defined as a resident operating alone, without attending having scrubbed) over the study period. Other outcomes of interest: operative time, 30-day-mortality and complications.

SETTING

The ACS-NSQIP database.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing one of 7 emergency general surgery operations.

RESULTS

Data regarding resident involvement was only available for the years 2005-2010. 90,790 operations were performed, 922 (1%) by residents operating independently. Appendectomy accounted for 61% independent cases. Independent resident operating was associated with a longer operative time (65 versus 58 minutes, p < 0.001), but lower risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (p < 0.001) and progressive renal insufficiency (p = 0.02). Independent operating was not associated with increased risk of complications/mortality.

CONCLUSION

Independent resident operating is rare, even with increasing attention to its importance, and is not associated with increased complications or mortality. National data on this subject is old and not currently collected. There is need for a national registry on resident involvement to understand the current effect of independent operating on outcomes.

General Surgery Resident Autonomy: Truth and Myth

Within general surgery education circles, the state of autonomy for residents in surgery training programs has been of growing concern. Although there is no direct evidence showing less autonomy in modern surgical training, multiple surrogates have been cited as reasons for concern. Many reasons have been given for lost autonomy including the 80-hour work week, financial constraints, concerns over quality of patient care, patient expectations, new and innovative technologies, legal limitations, and public opinion. This article discusses the current state of general surgery resident autonomy, why autonomy is important, barriers to autonomy, and ways to support autonomy.

It's not you, it's me: A descriptive study of patient complaints and surgeon understanding

BACKGROUND

Patient complaints are an underutilized and under-addressed issue in general surgery. They represent a unique sphere of interaction for surgeons and patients to understand motivations and failures in the delivery of healthcare. The aims of this study were to identify motivators of patient complaints and understand surgeon's awareness of this issue.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patient complaint data in a single regional general surgical department was undertaken between the periods October 2017 to June 2020 and June 2018 to October 2020 relating to patient demographics and subject of complaint. Secondly, an anonymous survey was conducted across the same department and results tabulated by seniority.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen complaints were received during the study period. One hundred and thirteen were made by patients, while 56 were made by family members. One hundred and fifty-nine complaints were related to an inpatient episode of care, and 152 were made in writing. The majority of complainants were female, with a mean age of 52. The most common reason for complaint was "treatment" (n = 102), followed by communication (n = 48), and humaneness/caring (n = 44). Consultant surgeons and surgical trainees placed communication, humaneness/caring, and professionalism as most likely to incite complaints, while interns were more likely to prioritize other measures such as patient healthcare rights and medications.

CONCLUSION

Patient complaints remain a relatively under-utilized resource in addressing the downfalls of general surgical departments. This study reports patient demographics that are congruent with the literature and highlights that surgeons prioritize many non-technical skills in the maintenance of the doctor-patient relationship, in contrast to preconceptions.

Not without my attending: a survey of patient and family member attitudes and perceptions about concurrent and overlapping surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Recent media coverage of overlapping surgery has led to several studies investigating public perception of concurrent and overlapping surgery, both of which involve a single attending surgeon working on two separate cases in two separate operating rooms. In concurrent surgery, the critical periods of the surgeries overlap, while in overlapping surgery they do not. The literature revealed a general lack of knowledge about these practices and strong disapproval of their use by the public.

PURPOSE

To determine the comfort level of spine surgery patients and their family members toward concurrent and overlapping surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This cross-sectional survey study was performed at an urban, adult academic spine surgery clinic.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients and their companions who were waiting to be seen at their initial clinic visit or follow-up visit were approached to participate in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The survey queried respondents' baseline knowledge of and comfort level with concurrent and overlapping surgery, in addition to comfort level with different levels of surgical trainees on a 5-point Likert scale.

METHODS

A five-section, 36-item questionnaire was administered by a research assistant to respondents over a 3-month period spanning June 2019 - August 2019. A research assistant described the terms overlapping surgery and concurrent surgery to participants of the survey using diagrams and a preformulated script after self-reported knowledge questions. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test for categorical variables, and Kendall's tau-c rank correlation coefficient with ordinal independent variables for correlations.

RESULTS

Knowledge about concurrent and overlapping surgery was low in our study population (8.22% and 6.16%, respectively). Over half of respondents reported that they felt comfortable with overlapping surgery (58.22%). Most respondents reported that they would like their surgeon to disclose the participation of surgical trainees (residents and fellows) in their surgery (98%). In addition, the 4th and 5th years of surgical training were associated with a significant increase in patient comfort with surgical trainee participation. There was no difference in response distribution between patients versus nonpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge about concurrent and overlapping surgery remains poor in our study population. Lack of general knowledge about overlapping surgery can be a serious impediment to obtaining informed consent, and further study is required to determine the best methods to raising patient awareness.

Patients' Perceptions of Resident Surgeon Involvement in Otolaryngology

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient acceptance of resident involvement in otolaryngologic procedures and to evaluate the impact of a written preoperative educational pamphlet.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

This is a prospective survey study at a large tertiary care academic center. In addition to standard perioperative instructions and informed consent, 87 out of 183 patients received a pamphlet with information on the role of the otolaryngology resident.

RESULTS

Greater than 90% of all patients surveyed recognized that resident physicians are directly involved in delivering care at teaching hospitals and may have assisted in their surgical procedure. Ninety percent of patients receiving educational pamphlets were aware residents may have performed portions of their procedure versus 71% in the control group (P = .001). Ninety-seven percent of patients receiving pamphlets wanted to know how much of their procedure was performed by a resident versus 71% of the control group (P < .001), and patients undergoing single-surgeon procedures were less likely to want to know how much was performed by a resident (P < .05). Ninety-six percent in the pamphlet group agreed that residents improved the quality of their care versus 79% of the control group (P = .001).

DISCUSSION

Resident surgeons are well received by the large majority of otolaryngology patients. Structured perioperative information regarding surgical training facilitates an honest and open informed consent discussion between the patient and surgeon and helps to establish a solid foundation of trust.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of this practice is simple and inexpensive. It should be considered for any clinical practice with a focus on surgical education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 2021.

Public Perceptions of General Surgery Residency Training

OBJECTIVE

Patients are integral to surgical training. Understanding our patients' perceptions of surgical training, resident involvement and autonomy is crucial to optimizing surgical education and thus patient care. In the modern, connected world many factors extrinsic to a patient's experience of healthcare may influence their opinion of our training systems (i.e., social media, television shows, and internet searches). The purpose of this article is to contextualize the literature investigating public perceptions of general surgery training to allow us to effect patient education initiatives to optimize both surgical training and patient safety.

DESIGN

This is a perspective including a literature review summarizing the current knowledge of public perceptions of general surgery training.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is published regarding patient and public perceptions of general surgery residency training and the role of residents within this. Current literature demonstrates that the majority of patients are willing to have residents participate in their care. Patients' attitude toward resident involvement in their operation is improved by utilizing educational materials and by ensuring a supervising attending is present within the operating room. These observations, coupled with future work to delve deeper into factors affecting public perceptions of surgical training and resident involvement within this, can guide strategies to improve surgical education.

Patient Perceptions of Trust in Trainees During Delivery of Surgical Care: A Thematic Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Trust is an essential element of an effective physician-patient relationship. There is limited literature examining trust between trainees and patients in the surgical setting. The goal of this study was to investigate how otolaryngology patients perceive trust in trainees during delivery of surgical care.

DESIGN

We extracted trainee-specific data from a larger, qualitative interview study examining trust in the surgeon-patient relationship. We then used realist thematic analysis to explore preoperative otolaryngology patients' perceptions of trust in trainees during delivery of surgical care.

SETTING

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Michigan Medicine in Ann Arbor, MI, a tertiary academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Using convenience sampling, adults 18 years or older scheduled to undergo elective otolaryngologic surgery between February and June 2019 were invited, and 12 agreed to participate in the study.

RESULTS

All participants (n = 12) self-identified as White/Caucasian with a mean age of 60 years (range, 28-82). Participants were 50% (n = 6) female and 50% (n = 6) male. Thematic analysis of participants' perspectives about trust in trainees during delivery of surgical care revealed 3 themes. Trust in trainees is conditional based on (i) level of trainee involvement; (ii) trust in the attending surgeon; and, (iii) trust in the institution.

CONCLUSION

Trust in trainees during delivery of surgical care is conditional on types of tasks trainees perform, bounded by trust in their attending surgeon, and positively influenced by institutional trust. Trainees and surgical educators must look to innovative methods to engender trust more efficiently in the clinic and immediate pre-operative setting. Such approaches can have a positive impact on patient outcomes, facilitate stronger trainee-attending interpersonal relationships, and empower surgeons to practice the professional values integral to surgical care.

Public perceptions of general surgery resident training and assessment

BACKGROUND

Patients play a crucial role in surgical training, but little is known about the public's knowledge of general surgery training structure or opinion of resident assessment. Our aim was to evaluate the public's knowledge of general surgery training and assessment processes.

METHODS

We administered an anonymous, electronic survey to US adult panelists using SurveyGizmo. We used Dillman's Tailored Design Method to optimize response rate. Questions pertained to demographics, knowledge of general surgery training structure, and opinions regarding resident assessment. Outcome measures included public knowledge of the structure of general surgery residency and the perceptions of resident assessment. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 93% (2005 of 2148). Respondents had nationally representative demographics. Most respondents had health insurance (87%). Sixty-one percent of respondents believed that 100% of hospitals trained residents. Age <40 years, Black race (odds ratio 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.96]), working in a hospital/health care field (odds ratio 1.49 [95% CI 1.12-1.97]), and having a family member/close acquaintance working in a hospital/health care field (odds ratio 1.53 [95% CI .20-1.94]) were associated with this belief. There was a preference to obtain online information about medical training (30% television [TV] shows, 24% Internet searches, 5% social media). Eighty percent of respondents felt that resident self-assessment and patient assessment of residents was "important" or "essential" when considering readiness for independent practice.

CONCLUSION

The US public has limited knowledge of general surgery training and competency assessment. Public educational strategies may help inform patients about the structure of training and assessment of trainees to improve engagement of these important stakeholders in surgical training.

Surgical Inpatient's Attitudes Toward Resident Participation: All About Expectations

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether an educational video can improve surgical inpatients' attitudes toward resident participation in their care.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the Trauma/Emergency General Surgery Service at University Hospital (San Antonio, Texas) were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Patients in the intervention group viewed a short educational video about the role and responsibilities of medical students, residents, and attending surgeons. All patients then completed a previously published survey.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients responded to the survey (control = 81 and intervention = 59 patients). Overall, 86.4% of patients were welcoming of resident participation. Patients who were expecting residents to be involved in their care had attitudes that are more favorable on almost all survey questions regardless of their study condition. However, patients in the intervention group who expected resident involvement in their care had more favorable attitudes about senior residents (postgraduate year 3-5) assisting in routine or complicated surgery than those in the control group who were expecting resident involvement (both p ≤ 0.001). This same group of patients also had more favorable attitudes about surgical outcomes and overall surgical health when residents are involved (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, respectively). Most patients (79%) said they had no residents previously involved in their care, or they were unsure if residents were previously involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient expectation of resident involvement is one of the most important factors influencing perceptions of inpatients about resident participation in surgery. Our goal should be early and frequent discussion with patients about resident involvement in order to foster an atmosphere of trust, including full transparency regarding resident involvement in surgical procedures. An educational video may help introduce the roles of trainees and attending surgeons but should not be used in lieu of direct discussion with patients.

Public Perception of General Surgery Resident Autonomy and Supervision

BACKGROUND

Despite patients being important stakeholders in surgical training, little is known about the public's perception of trainee participation in surgical care. This study evaluates the public's perception of surgical resident autonomy and supervision.

STUDY DESIGN

An anonymous electronic survey was sent to adult panelists older than 18 years in the US using SurveyGizmo. The design of the survey used Dillman's Tailored Design Method to optimize response rate. Participants completed surveys including demographic characteristics and perceptions toward general surgery resident autonomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 93% (2,005 of 2,148). Demographic characteristics including age, gender, race or ethnicity, and highest level of education were nationally representative. Most respondents (87%) had health insurance. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors associated with participants who would never allow a resident to perform any portion of the operation include: female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.58; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.95), no health insurance (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.84), Black race (OR 1.82; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.41), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.15). Participants who were younger than 50 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.98), male (OR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.32), of Black race (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.91), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.11), working in healthcare (OR 2.18; 95% CI, 1.67 to 2.86), or insured (OR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.99) were more likely to believe that resident involvement increases complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Among survey participants broadly representing the US population, resident participation in operations is not universally accepted. Public perception of surgical resident autonomy and supervision is important, as GME continues to evolve to address readiness for independent practice.

Toward Autonomy and Conditional Independence: A Standardized Script Improves Patient Acceptance of Surgical Trainee Roles

BACKGROUND

Progressive autonomy leading to conditional independence is necessary to achieve competence in surgical skills and decision making. Trust and transparency are ethical imperatives, but practices vary regarding the extent of disclosure of specific resident roles. We tested whether a standardized preoperative script would improve patient acceptance of resident involvement in perioperative care.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a resident-run acute care general surgery service between October 2017 and October 2018 were enrolled in an IRB-approved study. During the first half of the rotation (control), operative consent was obtained according to individual practice without specified explanation of resident roles. During the second half (intervention), the senior resident read a short semistructured script specifically explaining team roles and responsibilities, including the degree of resident independence and supervision by attendings. On postoperative day 3, patients completed a survey assessing understanding of their surgical care.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients under the care of 10 rotating chief residents were enrolled; 46 patients completed the survey, 23 in each arm (74% response rate). Ten patients in the control arm (43%) compared to only 3 (13%) in the intervention arm indicated that residents should not be allowed to perform portions of operations (odds ratio 4.94, p = 0.047). Patients in the intervention arm felt that care team roles were more adequately explained to them before their operation (p = 0.002). There was no difference in the number of patients naming a resident as "their doctor."

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a short script specifying resident roles improves patient acceptance of trainee participation in perioperative care.

Caregiver knowledge, opinion, and willingness to consent to trainee involvement in pediatric surgical care

PURPOSE

Surgical training is shifting toward competency-based models that promote earlier supervised autonomy. We assessed caregiver knowledge, willingness to consent, and opinions regarding trainee autonomy in their child's operation.

METHODS

At two academic children's hospitals, 100 caregivers of children aged 0-17 years completed an electronic survey in the pediatric surgery clinic (1/2018-4/2018). Knowledge, willingness to consent, and opinions of trainee involvement in their child's operation in standard and competency-based training models were assessed. McNemar's test compared willingness to consent with standard and competency-based training (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Caregivers were 75% female, 41% age 30-39 years old, and 78% white. All provider roles were correctly identified by 14% of caregivers. For routine procedures, caregivers would consent to a fellow assisting (95%) or independently operating with the attending present (78%). They would less likely consent if the attending was not in the operating room (39%) or the hospital (25%). Competency-based training improved willingness to consent, but was significant only for independence with the attending present. Most caregivers wanted to know about (81%) and be asked permission for (82%) trainee involvement in their child's operation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that surgeons in academic settings must balance transparency with trainee autonomy when obtaining caregiver consent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.