Habitual sleep duration affects recovery from acute sleep deprivation: A modeling study

Deficient synaptic neurotransmission results in a persistent sleep-like cortical activity across vigilance states in mice

Growing evidence suggests that brain activity during sleep, as well as sleep regulation, are tightly linked with synaptic function and network excitability at the local and global levels. We previously reported that a mutation in synaptobrevin 2 (Vamp2) in restless (rlss) mice results in a marked increase of wakefulness and suppression of sleep, in particular REM sleep (REMS), as well as increased consolidation of sleep and wakefulness. In this study, using finer-scale in vivo electrophysiology recordings, we report that spontaneous cortical activity in rlss mice during NREM sleep (NREMS) is characterized by an occurrence of abnormally prolonged periods of complete neuronal silence (OFF-periods), often lasting several seconds, similar to the burst suppression pattern typically seen under deep anesthesia. Increased incidence of prolonged network OFF-periods was not specific to NREMS but also present in REMS and wake in rlss mice. Slow-wave activity (SWA) was generally increased in rlss mice relative to controls, while higher frequencies, including theta-frequency activity, were decreased, further resulting in diminished differences between vigilance states. The relative increase in SWA after sleep deprivation was attenuated in rlss mice, suggesting either that rlss mice experience persistently elevated sleep pressure or, alternatively, that the intrusion of sleep-like patterns of activity into the wake state attenuates the accumulation of sleep drive. We propose that a deficit in global synaptic neurotransmitter release leads to "state inertia," reflected in an abnormal propensity of brain networks to enter and remain in a persistent "default state" resembling coma or deep anesthesia.

Impact of Varying Sleep Pressure on Daytime Sleep Propensity in Healthy Young and Older Adults

Fixed sleep schedules with an 8 h time in bed (TIB) are used to ensure participants are well-rested before laboratory studies. However, such schedules may lead to cumulative excess wakefulness in young individuals. Effects on older individuals are unknown. We combine modelling and experimental data to quantify the effects of sleep debt on sleep propensity in healthy younger and older participants. A model of arousal dynamics was fitted to sleep data from 22 young (20-31 y.o.) and 26 older (61-82 y.o.) individuals (25 male) undertaking 10 short sleep-wake cycles during a 40 h napping protocol, following >1 week of fixed 8 h TIB schedules. Homeostatic sleep drive at the study start was varied systematically to identify best fits between observed and predicted sleep profiles for individuals and group averages. Daytime sleep duration was the same on the two days of the protocol within the groups but different between the groups (young: 3.14 ± 0.98 h vs. 3.06 ± 0.75 h, older: 2.60 ± 0.98 h vs. 2.37 ± 0.64 h). The model predicted an initial homeostatic drive of 11.2 ± 3.5% (young) and 10.1 ± 3.5% (older) above well-rested. Individual variability in first-day, but not second-day, sleep patterns was explained by the differences in the initial homeostatic drive for both age groups. Our study suggests that both younger and older participants arrive at the laboratory with cumulative sleep debt, despite 8 h TiB schedules, which dissipates after the first four sleep opportunities on the protocol. This has implications for protocol design and the interpretation of laboratory studies.

Data-driven mathematical modeling of sleep consolidation in early childhood

Across early childhood development, sleep behavior transitions from a biphasic pattern (a daytime nap and nighttime sleep) to a monophasic pattern (only nighttime sleep). The transition to consolidated nighttime sleep, which occurs in most children between 2- and 5-years-old, is a major developmental milestone and reflects interactions between the developing homeostatic sleep drive and circadian system. Using a physiologically-based mathematical model of the sleep-wake regulatory network constrained by observational and experimental data from preschool-aged participants, we analyze how developmentally-mediated changes in the homeostatic sleep drive may contribute to the transition from napping to non-napping sleep patterns. We establish baseline behavior by identifying parameter sets that model typical 2-year-old napping behavior and 5-year-old non-napping behavior. Then we vary six model parameters associated with the dynamics of and sensitivity to the homeostatic sleep drive between the 2-year-old and 5-year-old parameter values to induce the transition from biphasic to monophasic sleep. We analyze the individual contributions of these parameters to sleep patterning by independently varying their age-dependent developmental trajectories. Parameters vary according to distinct evolution curves and produce bifurcation sequences representing various ages of transition onset, transition durations, and transitional sleep patterns. Finally, we consider the ability of napping and non-napping light schedules to reinforce napping or promote a transition to consolidated sleep, respectively. These modeling results provide insight into the role of the homeostatic sleep drive in promoting interindividual variability in developmentally-mediated transitions in sleep behavior and lay foundations for the identification of light- or behavior-based interventions that promote healthy sleep consolidation in early childhood.

Method to determine whether sleep phenotypes are driven by endogenous circadian rhythms or environmental light by combining longitudinal data and personalised mathematical models

Sleep timing varies between individuals and can be altered in mental and physical health conditions. Sleep and circadian sleep phenotypes, including circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders, may be driven by endogenous physiological processes, exogeneous environmental light exposure along with social constraints and behavioural factors. Identifying the relative contributions of these driving factors to different phenotypes is essential for the design of personalised interventions. The timing of the human sleep-wake cycle has been modelled as an interaction of a relaxation oscillator (the sleep homeostat), a stable limit cycle oscillator with a near 24-hour period (the circadian process), man-made light exposure and the natural light-dark cycle generated by the Earth's rotation. However, these models have rarely been used to quantitatively describe sleep at the individual level. Here, we present a new Homeostatic-Circadian-Light model (HCL) which is simpler, more transparent and more computationally efficient than other available models and is designed to run using longitudinal sleep and light exposure data from wearable sensors. We carry out a systematic sensitivity analysis for all model parameters and discuss parameter identifiability. We demonstrate that individual sleep phenotypes in each of 34 older participants (65-83y) can be described by feeding individual participant light exposure patterns into the model and fitting two parameters that capture individual average sleep duration and timing. The fitted parameters describe endogenous drivers of sleep phenotypes. We then quantify exogenous drivers using a novel metric which encodes the circadian phase dependence of the response to light. Combining endogenous and exogeneous drivers better explains individual mean mid-sleep (adjusted R-squared 0.64) than either driver on its own (adjusted R-squared 0.08 and 0.17 respectively). Critically, our model and analysis highlights that different people exhibiting the same sleep phenotype may have different driving factors and opens the door to personalised interventions to regularize sleep-wake timing that are readily implementable with current digital health technology.

Modeling the Effects of Napping and Non-napping Patterns of Light Exposure on the Human Circadian Oscillator

In early childhood, consolidation of sleep from a biphasic to a monophasic sleep-wake pattern, that is, the transition from sleeping during an afternoon nap and at night to sleeping only during the night, represents a major developmental milestone. Reduced napping behavior is associated with an advance in the timing of the circadian system; however, it is unknown if this advance represents a standard response of the circadian clock to altered patterns of light exposure or if it additionally reflects features of the developing circadian system. Using a mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker, we investigated the impact of napping and non-napping patterns of light exposure on entrained circadian phases. Simulated light schedules were based on published data from 20 children (34.2 ± 2.0 months) with habitual napping or non-napping sleep patterns (15 nappers). We found the model predicted different circadian phases for napping and non-napping light patterns: both the decrease in afternoon light during the nap and the increase in evening light associated with napping toddlers' later bedtimes contributed to the observed circadian phase difference produced between napping and non-napping light schedules. We systematically quantified the effects on phase shifting of nap duration, timing, and light intensity, finding larger phase delays occurred for longer and earlier naps. In addition, we simulated phase response curves to a 1-h light pulse and 1-h dark pulse to predict phase and intensity dependence of these changes in light exposure. We found the light pulse produced larger shifts compared with the dark pulse, and we analyzed the model dynamics to identify the features contributing to this asymmetry. These findings suggest that napping status affects circadian timing due to altered patterns of light exposure, with the dynamics of the circadian clock and light processing mediating the effects of the dark pulse associated with a daytime nap.

Modeling homeostatic and circadian modulation of human pain sensitivity

Introduction

Mathematical modeling has played a significant role in understanding how homeostatic sleep pressure and the circadian rhythm interact to influence sleep-wake behavior. Pain sensitivity is also affected by these processes, and recent experimental results have measured the circadian and homeostatic components of the 24 h rhythm of thermal pain sensitivity in humans. To analyze how rhythms in pain sensitivity are affected by disruptions in sleep behavior and shifts in circadian rhythms, we introduce a dynamic mathematical model for circadian and homeostatic regulation of sleep-wake states and pain intensity.

Methods

The model consists of a biophysically based, sleep-wake regulation network model coupled to data-driven functions for the circadian and homeostatic modulation of pain sensitivity. This coupled sleep-wake-pain sensitivity model is validated by comparison to thermal pain intensities in adult humans measured across a 34 h sleep deprivation protocol.

Results

We use the model to predict dysregulation of pain sensitivity rhythms across different scenarios of sleep deprivation and circadian rhythm shifts, including entrainment to new environmental light and activity timing as occurs with jet lag and chronic sleep restriction. Model results show that increases in pain sensitivity occur under conditions of increased homeostatic sleep drive with nonlinear modulation by the circadian rhythm, leading to unexpected decreased pain sensitivity in some scenarios.

Discussion

This model provides a useful tool for pain management by predicting alterations in pain sensitivity due to varying or disrupted sleep schedules.

NREM-REM alternation complicates transitions from napping to non-napping behavior in a three-state model of sleep-wake regulation

The temporal structure of human sleep changes across development as it consolidates from the polyphasic sleep of infants to the single nighttime sleep episode typical in adults. Experimental studies have shown that changes in the dynamics of sleep need may mediate this developmental transition in sleep patterning, however, it is unknown how sleep architecture interacts with these changes. We employ a physiologically-based mathematical model that generates wake, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep states to investigate how NREM-REM alternation affects the transition in sleep patterns as the dynamics of the homeostatic sleep drive are varied. To study the mechanisms producing these transitions, we analyze the bifurcations of numerically-computed circle maps that represent key dynamics of the full sleep-wake network model by tracking the evolution of sleep onsets across different circadian (∼ 24 h) phases. The maps are non-monotonic and discontinuous, being composed of branches that correspond to sleep-wake cycles containing distinct numbers of REM bouts. As the rates of accumulation and decay of the homeostatic sleep drive are varied, we identify the bifurcations that disrupt a period-adding-like behavior of sleep patterns in the transition between biphasic and monophasic sleep. These bifurcations include border collision and saddle-node bifurcations that initiate new sleep patterns, period-doubling bifurcations leading to higher-order patterns of NREM-REM alternation, and intervals of bistability of sleep patterns with different NREM-REM alternations. Furthermore, patterns of NREM-REM alternation exhibit variable behaviors in different regimes of constant sleep-wake patterns. Overall, the sequence of sleep-wake behaviors, and underlying bifurcations, in the transition from biphasic to monophasic sleep in this three-state model is more complex than behavior observed in models of sleep-wake regulation that do not consider the dynamics of NREM-REM alternation. These results suggest that interactions between the dynamics of the homeostatic sleep drive and the dynamics of NREM-REM alternation may contribute to the wide interindividual variation observed when young children transition from napping to non-napping behavior.

Human Alertness Optimization with a Three-Process Dynamic Model

Circadian rhythm is an important biological process for humans as it modulates a wide range of physiological processes, including body temperature, sleep-wake cycle, and cognitive performance. As the most powerful external stimulus of circadian rhythm, light has been studied as a zeitgeber to regulate the circadian phase and sleep. This paper addresses the human alertness optimization problem, by optimizing light exposure and sleep schedules to relieve fatigue and cognitive impairment, in cases of night-shift workers and subjects with certain mission periods based on dynamics of the circadian rhythm system. A three-process hybrid dynamic model is used for simulating the circadian rhythm and predicting subjective alertness and sleepiness. Based on interindividual difference in sleep type and living habits, we propose a tunable sleep schedule in the alertness optimization problem, which allows the appropriate tuning of sleep and wake times based on sleep propensity. Variational calculus is applied to evaluate the impacts of light and sleep schedules on the alertness and a gradient descent algorithm is proposed to determine the optimal solutions to maximize the alertness level in various cases. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that the cognitive performance during certain periods can be significantly improved by optimizing the light input and tuning sleep/wake times compared to empirical data.

Optimization of light exposure and sleep schedule for circadian rhythm entrainment

The circadian rhythm, called Process C, regulates a wide range of biological processes in humans including sleep, metabolism, body temperature, and hormone secretion. Light is the dominant synchronizer of the circadian rhythm-it has been used to regulate the circadian phase to cope with jet-lag, shift work, and sleep disorder. The homeostatic oscillation of the sleep drive is called Process S. Process C and Process S together determine the sleep-wake cycle in what is known as the two-process model. This paper addresses the regulation of both Process C and Process S by scheduling light exposure and sleep based on numerical simulations of circadian rhythm and sleep mathematical models. This is a significant step beyond the existing literature that only considers the entrainment of Process C. Regulation of the two-process model poses several unique features and challenges: 1. Process S is non-smooth, i.e., the homeostatic dynamics are different in the sleep and wake regimes; 2. Light only indirectly affects Process S through Process C; 3. Light does not affect Process C during sleep. We consider two scenarios: optimizing light intensity as the control input with spontaneous (i.e., unscheduled) sleep/wake times and jointly optimizing the light intensity and the sleep/wake times, which allows limited delayed sleep and early waking as part of the decision variables. We solve the time-optimal entrainment problem for the two-process model for both scenarios using an extension of the gradient descent algorithm to non-smooth systems. To illustrate the efficacy of our time-optimal entrainment strategies, we consider two common use cases: transmeridian travelers and shift workers. For transmeridian travelers, joint optimization of the two-process model avoids the unrealistic long wake duration when only Process C is considered. The entrainment time also decreases when both the light input and the sleep schedule are optimized compared to when only the light input is optimized. For shift workers, we show that the entrainment time is significantly shortened by optimizing the night shift working light.