Three-Year Follow-Up of Neoadjuvant Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC

Neck dissection in cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: a chance for immunotherapy

Elective neck dissection is the standard neck management for cT1-T2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but it carries a high risk of complications and overtreatment. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been less studied in early-stage OSCC, but recent evidence has emphasized that the absence of healthy lymph nodes may compromise the immune response, suggesting that the introduction of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage patients with healthier lymph nodes may be beneficial for treatment outcomes. This review explores the potential of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations and the watch-and-wait strategy as alternative approaches to neck management in early-stage OSCC, with the aim of achieving both optimal survival and quality of life. The current landscape of neck management and the immune function of lymph nodes are summarized, and the current evidence and potential advantages of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations in the treatment of early-stage OSCC are highlighted. Further evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combination in controlling occult metastases is needed to determine the potential survival benefits. In addition, the effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage OSCC may be enhanced by the development of non-invasive lymph node diagnostics, clinical risk decision systems, and lymph node drug delivery systems.

Survival outcome comparison of neoadjuvant and perioperative ICI-based therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer achieving MPR or pCR: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the survival benefits of perioperative versus neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based therapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing specifically on those who achieve major pathological response (MPR) or pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant ICI-based treatment.

METHOD

s: A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. A trial-level proportional meta-analysis was conducted to compare the two treatment modalities. A patient-level-based analysis was also conducted to obtain more evidence of different perioperative treatment regimens. Cox regression and accelerated failure time models were used to analyze the survival benefits in patients who achieved MPR or pCR for the proper treatment modality.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in the trial-level proportional meta-analysis, wherein no statistical significance was observed in the 1-, 2-, and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rates between patients with MPR and pCR receiving perioperative or neoadjuvant ICI-based therapy. The pooled median EFS (mEFS) was 40.1 and 32.1 months in patients with MPR receiving perioperative and neoadjuvant ICI-based therapies, respectively. Meanwhile, the pooled mEFS was 35.4 and 34.2 months in patients with pCR receiving perioperative and neoadjuvant ICI-based therapies, respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis showed that perioperative chemoimmunotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor compared with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in MPR patients (P = 0.038), but not in those with pCR (P = 0.408).

CONCLUSIONS

The EFS were similar among patients with NSCLC who received neoadjuvant and perioperative ICI-based treatment and achieved MPR or pCR. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that perioperative chemoimmunotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor in patients who achieved MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, but not in those who reached pCR.

Synergistic Strategies for Lung Cancer Immunotherapy: Combining Phytochemicals and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors

Lung cancer remains one of the most widespread and deadliest malignant tumors globally, with a particularly high mortality rate among all cancers. Recently, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has emerged as a crucial treatment strategy for lung cancer patients, following surgical intervention, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted drug therapies. However, the therapeutic limitations are caused owing to their low response rate and undesirable side effects such as immune-related pneumonitis. Therefore, developing new strategies to improve the efficacy of ICIs while minimizing immune-related adverse events will be crucial for cancer immunotherapy. The tumor immune microenvironment plays a significant role in the success of lung cancer immunotherapy, and the immunosuppressive characteristics of the immune microenvironment are one of the major obstacles to the poor immunotherapeutic effect. Phytochemicals, naturally occurring compounds in plants, have shown promise in enhancing cancer immunotherapy by remodeling the immunosuppressive microenvironment, offering the potential to increase the efficacy of ICIs. Therefore, this review summarizes the associated mechanisms of phytochemicals remodeling the immunosuppressive microenvironment in lung cancer. Additionally, the review will focus on the synergistic effects of combining phytochemicals with ICIs, aiming to improve anticancer efficacy and reduce side effects, which may hopefully offer novel strategies to overcome current limitations in immunotherapy.

Real-world long-term outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been included in various neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) regimens for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, due to the relatively short period for the use of ICIs in NAT, patients' clinical outcomes with different regimens are uncertain. Our study aims to examine the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) for NSCLC patients and compare the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of patients receiving different NAT regimens.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 308 NSCLC patients treated with different NAT regimens and subsequent surgery in National Cancer Center between August 1, 2016 and July 31, 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were conducted to evaluate the prognosis of patients.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 27.5 months, the 1-year OS rates were 98.8% and 96.2%, and the 2-year OS rates were 96.6% and 85.8% in patients of the NAIT and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.339; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.160-0.720; P = 0.003). The 1-year EFS rates were 96.0% and 88.0%, and the 2-year EFS rates were 92.0% and 77.7% for patients in the NAIT and NACT groups, respectively (HR, 0.438; 95% CI, 0.276-0.846; P = 0.010). For patients who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR), significantly longer OS (P = 0.012) and EFS (P = 0.019) were observed in patients receiving NAIT than those receiving NACT. Different NAT regimens had little effect on surgery and the postoperative length of stay (6 [4, 7] days vs. 6 [4, 7] days, Z = -0.227, P = 0.820).

CONCLUSIONS

NAIT exhibited superior efficacy to NACT for NSCLC, resulting in longer OS and EFS. The OS and EFS benefits were also observed among patients in the NAIT group who did not achieve pCR.

Navigating the landscape of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for NSCLC: progress and controversies

Recently, attention has increasingly centered on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immune checkpoint inhibitors application. Numerous clinical studies have underscored the potential of immunotherapy in treating resectable NSCLC, highlighting its role in improving patient outcomes. However, despite these promising results, there is ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of immunological combination therapy strategies, the prevalence of treatment-related side effects, the identification of predictive biomarkers, and various other challenges within the neoadjuvant context. Careful consideration is essential to maximize the benefits of immunotherapy for patients with resectable NSCLC. This article offers a detailed overview of recent advancements in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC. By examining these developments, we aim to provide new perspectives and valuable insights into the benefits and challenges of applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in clinical settings.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Opportunities and challenges

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Numerous trials have explored the use of ICIs, either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, in the neoadjuvant setting for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer. Most trials have demonstrated neoadjuvant immunotherapy to be safe and to have remarkable efficacy, with a high pathological response rate and significantly improved event-free survival. This review summarizes the findings of Phase I-III clinical trials investigating various neoadjuvant regimens, including ICI monotherapy, ICI therapy combined with chemotherapy, ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI therapy in combination with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We discuss the benefits and outcomes associated with each approach. Despite the results being promising, several unresolved issues remain, including identification of reliable biomarkers, the appropriate duration of therapy, the optimal treatment regimen for tumors with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, the false-negative pathological complete response rate, and the role of digital pathology in assessing the response to treatment. Resistance to immunotherapy, in particular, remains a significant barrier to effective use of ICIs. Given the critical influence of the tumor microenvironment (TME) on the response to treatment, we examine the characteristics of the TME in both responsive and resistant tumors as well as the dynamic changes that occur in the TME in response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. We also summarize the mechanisms underlying T cell responses following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and provide a perspective on strategies to enhance the understanding of tumor heterogeneity, therapy-driven TME remodeling, and overcoming resistance to therapy. Finally, we propose future directions for advancements in personalized neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Integrating machine learning and multi-omics analysis to develop an asparagine metabolism immunity index for improving clinical outcome and drug sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a malignancy affecting the respiratory system. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced or metastatic lung cancer due to the fact that most of their clinical symptoms are insidious, resulting in a bleak prognosis. Given that abnormal reprogramming of asparagine metabolism (AM) has emerged as an emerging therapeutic target for anti-tumor therapy. However, the clinical significance of abnormal reprogramming of AM in LUAD patients is unclear. In this study, we collected 864 asparagine metabolism-related genes (AMGs) and used a machine-learning computational framework to develop an asparagine metabolism immunity index (AMII) for LUAD patients. Through the utilization of median AMII scores, LUAD patients were segregated into either a low-AMII group or a high-AMII group. We observed outstanding performance of AMII in predicting survival prognosis in LUAD patients in the TCGA-LUAD cohort and in three externally independently validated GEO cohorts (GSE72094, GSE37745, and GSE30219), and poorer prognosis for LUAD patients in the high-AMII group. The results of univariate and multivariate analyses showed that AMII can be used as an independent risk factor for LUAD patients. In addition, the results of C-index analysis and decision analysis showed that AMII-based nomograms had a robust performance in terms of accuracy of prognostic prediction and net clinical benefit in patients with LUAD. Excitingly, LUAD patients in the low-AMII group were more sensitive to commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs. Consequently, AMII is expected to be a novel diagnostic tool for clinical classification, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making and personalized management of LUAD patients.

Assessment of PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 PET/CT

Assessing programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in metastatic cases, remains challenging. In this study, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 micro-PET/CT imaging are performed. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT are performed on a cohort of 20 patients with NSCLC. Semi-quantitative assessments include SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and target-to-background ratio (TBR). DOTA-WL12 exhibits robust PD-L1 binding with a KD value of 0.2 nM. Subsequent human studies reveal significant correlations between PD-L1 expression and the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 SUVmax in primary and metastatic lesions, surpassing the [18F]FDG results (r = 0.8889, p <0.0001 vs r = 0.0469, p = 0.8127). Notably, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 imaging discerned SUVmax and TBR differences between PD-L1 TPS ≤1% and PD-L1 TPS > 1% groups (p all <0.001). In an NSCLC patient with brain metastases, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 shows a SUVmean of 0.04 in the brain background, with TBR values of 17 and 23, underscoring its potential for detecting brain metastases. The study provides initial evidence for the clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 PET/CT for lesion detection, immunotherapy selection, and therapeutic efficacy evaluation in PD-L1-expressing NSCLC, demonstrating its potential as a valuable tool in NSCLC research and management.

Impact of bone metastasis on prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for approximately 85% of cases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed treatment for advanced NSCLC, the role of bone metastasis in modulating ICI efficacy remains unclear. Bone metastasis, occurring in 30-40% of advanced NSCLC cases, is associated with worse outcomes. However, how this affects the therapeutic benefit of ICIs has not been fully elucidated, highlighting a critical knowledge gap in optimizing treatment for this patient population.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, identified 13 studies with a total of 3,681 patients, of whom 37.6% had bone metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between NSCLC patients with and without bone metastasis. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model to account for study heterogeneity.

Results

The meta-analysis demonstrated that bone metastasis significantly worsened overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Specifically, bone metastasis was associated with a 45% increased risk of death (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.30-1.62, p < 0.001) and a 40% increased risk of disease progression (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.25-1.58, p < 0.001). No statistically significant impact on PFS was observed. (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.77-2.10, p = 0.34). High heterogeneity was observed in some subgroup analyses (I² = 72%), indicating variability in the results.

Conclusion

Bone metastasis is a significant negative prognostic factor for NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, associated with a higher risk of mortality and disease progression. These results underscore the importance of tailored treatment approaches for NSCLC patients with bone metastasis and call for further research to optimize therapy outcomes in this group.

Exploring clinical factors to predict the survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer with neoadjuvant immunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The goal was to explore clinical factors and build a predictive model for the disease-free and overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for patients in this multicentre study were as follows: (i) Patients who were diagnosed with stages I-III NSCLC after a bronchoscopy biopsy or puncture; (ii) patients who were examined with computed tomography/positron emission tomography-computed tomography before treatment and surgery; (iii) patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for 2 to 6 cycles preoperatively; (iv) patients whose peripheral blood indicators and tumour markers were assessed before treatment and preoperatively; (v) patients who underwent radical lung cancer surgery after neoadjuvant therapy. Cases were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to 78 clinical indicators based on a 10-fold Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator selection. We used Cox proportional hazards models to predict disease-free and overall survival. Then, we used time-dependent area under the curve and decision curve analyses to examine the accuracy of the results.

RESULTS

Data were collected continuously, and 212 and 85 cases were randomly assigned to training and testing sets, respectively. The area under the curve for the prediction of disease-free survival (training: 1 year, 0.83; 2 years, 0.81; 3 years, 0.83 versus testing: 1 year, 0.65; 2 years, 0.66; 3 years, 0.70), overall survival (training: 1 year, 0.86; 2 years, 0.85; 3 years, 0.86 versus testing: 1 year, 0.66; 2 years, 0.57; 3 years, 0.70) were determined. The coefficient factors including pathological response; preoperative tumour maximum diameter; preoperative lymph shorter diameter; preoperative tumour and lymph maximum standardized uptake value; change in tumour standardized uptake value preoperatively; and blood-related risk factors were favourably associated with prognosis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prediction model, which integrated data from preoperative positron emission tomography-CT, preoperative blood parameters and pathological response, was able to make highly accurate predictions for disease-free and overall survival in patients with NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant immunity with chemical therapy.

A current comprehensive role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to review the efficacy, safety, and evidence for current use and potential future uses of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was carried out through PubMed to identify completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use, efficacy, and safety of ICIs in the management of resectable NSCLC.

DATA SUMMARY

To date, four phase 3 trials have emerged that have changed our treatment practice concerning the utilization of ICIs during the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. The IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials examined the application of adjuvant atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, respectively, following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. In the CheckMate 816 trial, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy received approval for patients with resectable NSCLC. Also, for patients with resectable NSCLC, the use of a pembrolizumab and chemotherapy combination as a perioperative therapy received approval based on the results of the KEYNOTE-671 trial. Apart from these trials, there are numerous phase 2 and phase 3 trials, some of which have been published while others are still in progress.

CONCLUSION

Despite the promising outcomes from these trials there remain several unanswered questions. In this review, we will assess clinical trials involving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative ICIs, aiming to address the unresolved questions related to these therapeutic approaches.

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Sleeve Resection

The prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor despite the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as it has been shown to improve 5-year absolute benefit survival by only 5%. Recently, neoadjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), combined with chemotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. For NSCLC invading the main bronchus, sleeve resection has become the preferred modality to avoid pneumonectomy and reserve more cardiac or pulmonary function and to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, there has been a paucity of evidence to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy on bronchial-vascular reconstruction owing to the limited number of patients treated by sleeve lobectomy. Despite promising initial results, key knowledge gaps remain, including the impact on bronchial-vascular reconstruction, biomarkers predictive of ICI response, and the potential for specific perioperative complications associated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the context of sleeve resection. This review summarizes the latest literature evidence on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy approaches to address the unmet needs of sleeve resection of NSCLC treatment, describes the biomarkers predictive of ICI responses, and perioperative outcomes of sleeve resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Five-year follow-up of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy exhibits potential in treating resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previously, we have reported the 3-year clinical outcomes of this trial, implying the effectiveness and feasibility of neoadjuvant sintilimab monotherapy. However, the long-term prognosis of patients receiving neoadjuvant mono-immunotherapy has yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

For patients with stage IA-IIIB NSCLC, two doses of sintilimab (200 mg) were administered intravenously in the neoadjuvant setting. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed in these updated results. The predictive role of specific biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy was also explored.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 61.0 months, 5-year DFS and OS rates of patients who underwent R0 resection were 65.7% and 80.4%, respectively. The 5-year DFS and OS rates of patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were 71.9% and 90.9%, respectively. The presence of PD-L1 positivity (tumor proportion score ≥1%) showed a tendency toward the promising prognosis (OS, HR, 0.143; 95% CI: 0.027 to 0.743), especially for those who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR). In addition, tumor mutation burden was positively correlated with a favorable prognosis. A total of 10 recurrences and 5 subsequent deaths were identified within the 5-year follow-up, with lung metastasis being the predominant.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated analyses were the first to unveil the 5-year survival benefits of neoadjuvant sintilimab monotherapy, implying the potential value of PD-1 inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy.

[Perioperative Immunotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and New Standard of Care]

Immunotherapy has drastically changed the treatment of lung cancer not only in systemic disease but also in the perioperative setting in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In particular, the neoadjuvant and perioperative therapy regimes of the CheckMate 816 and KEYNOTE-671 studies as well as the adjuvant therapy according to the IMPower010 and the PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 protocols have already been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of selected cases. Other therapy protocols and combination therapies with varying drug classes and therapy modalities are currently being examined for their effectiveness and tolerance. The new treatment landscape creates new opportunities but also challenges for the treating disciplines. This article will focus on the current evidence for perioperative immunotherapy for resectable lung cancer and the resulting therapy standards, especially with regard to patient selection for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy, as well as current research efforts.

Three-year outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus nivolumab in microsatellite stable and microsatellite instability-high locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We reported the short-term outcomes of the VOLTAGE trial that investigated the safety and efficacy of preoperative CRT followed by nivolumab and surgery. Here, we present the 3-year outcomes of this trial.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) LARC and five patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) LARC underwent CRT (50.4 Gy) followed by five doses of nivolumab (240 mg) and surgery. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and associations with biomarkers were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 3-year RFS rates in patients with MSS and MSI-H were 79.5% and 100%, respectively, and the 3-year OS rates were 97.4% and 100%, respectively. Of the MSS patients, those with pre-CRT PD-L1 positivity, pre-CRT high CD8 + T cell/effector regulatory T cell (eTreg) ratio, pre-CRT high expression of Ki-67, CTLA-4, and PD-1 had a trend toward better 3-year RFS than those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-year outcomes of patients with MSI-H were better than those of patients with MSS. PD-L1 positivity, elevated CD8/eTreg ratio, and high expression of Ki-67, CTLA-4, and PD-1 could be positive predictors of prognosis in patients with MSS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02948348.

Promising Combinatorial Therapeutic Strategies against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents a complex and diverse disease, exhibiting variations at individuals' cellular and histological levels. This complexity gives rise to different subtypes and genetic mutations, posing challenges for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Nevertheless, continuous progress in medical research and therapies is continually shaping the landscape of NSCLC diagnosis and management. The treatment of NSCLC has undergone significant advancements in recent years, especially with the emergence of targeted therapies that have shown remarkable efficacy in patients with actionable mutations. This has ushered in the era of personalized medicine in NSCLC treatment, with improvements in molecular and immunohistochemical techniques contributing to enhanced progression-free survival. This review focuses on the latest progress, challenges, and future directions in developing targeted therapies for NSCLC, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), DNA-damaging agents, immunotherapy regimens, natural drug therapy, and nanobodies. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have demonstrated enhanced overall survival in patients receiving different targeted and natural drug therapies.

Association of pathological response with long-term survival outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.

Factors correlating the expression of PD-L1

OBJECTIVE

PD-L1 was an important biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma. The study was to confirm the most important factor affecting the expression of PD-L1 remains undetermined.

METHODS

The clinical records of 1045 lung adenocarcinoma patients were retrospectively reviewed. The High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scanning images of all the participants were analyzed, and based on the CT characteristics, the adenocarcinomas were categorized according to CT textures. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression and Ki67 index were detected by immunohistochemistry. All patients underwent EGFR mutation detection.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04-2.89, p = 0.004), EGFR wild (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.11-2.07, p = 0.009), micropapillary subtypes (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.46-2.89, p < 0.0001), and high expression of Ki67 (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.44-2.82, p < 0.0001) were independent factors which influence PD-L1 expression. In univariate analysis, tumor size > 3 cm and CT textures of pSD showed a correlation with high expression of PD-L1. Further analysis revealed that smoking, micropapillary subtype, and EGFR wild type were also associated with high Ki67 expression. Moreover, high Ki67 expression was observed more frequently in tumors of size > 3 cm than in tumors with ≤ 3 cm size as well as in CT texture of pSD than lesions with GGO components. In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only lesions with micropapillary components correlated with pSD (OR: 3.96, 95% CI: 2.52-5.37, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that in lung adenocarcinoma high Ki67 expression significantly influenced PD-L1 expression, an important biomarker for immune checkpoint treatment.

NGEF is a potential prognostic biomarker and could serve as an indicator for immunotherapy and chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neuronal guanine nucleotide exchange factor (NGEF) plays a key role in several cancers; however, its role in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NGEF as a prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for LUAD.

METHODS

NGEF expression data for multiple cancers and LUAD were downloaded from multiple databases. The high- and low-NGEF expression groups were constructed based on median NGEF expression in LUAD samples, and then performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the two NGEF expression groups were screened and applied to construct a protein-protein interaction network. The primary pathways were obtained using gene set enrichment analysis. The associations between NGEF expression and clinical characteristics, immune infiltration, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), sensitivity to chemotherapy, and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were investigated using R. Levels of NGEF expression in the lung tissue was validated using single-cell RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), immunohistochemical staining, and western blot analysis.

RESULTS

The expression of NGEF mRNA was upregulated in multiple cancers. mRNA and protein expression levels of NGEF were higher in patients with LUAD than in controls, as validated using qPCR and western blot. High NGEF expression was an independent prognostic factor for LUAD and was associated with advanced tumor stage, large tumor size, more lymph node metastasis, and worse overall survival (OS). A total of 182 overlapping DEGs were screened between The Cancer Genome Atlas and GSE31210, among which the top 20 hub genes were identified. NGEF expression was mainly enriched in the pathways of apoptosis, cell cycle, and DNA replication. Moreover, elevated NGEF expression were associated with a high fraction of activated memory CD4+ T cells and M0 macrophages; elevated expression levels of the ICIs: programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 expression; higher TMB; and better sensitivity to bortezomib, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and parthenolide, but less sensitivity to axitinib and metformin.

CONCLUSION

NGEF expression is upregulated in LUAD and is significantly associated with tumor stages, OS probability, immune infiltration, immunotherapy response, and chemotherapy response. NGEF may be a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in LUAD.

Multi‑omics approach to improve patient‑tailored therapy using immune checkpoint blockade and cytokine‑induced killer cell infusion in an elderly patient with lung cancer: A case report and literature review

The 5-year survival rate of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains low, despite recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Therefore, there is a need to identify alternative strategies to improve treatment outcomes. Modern diagnostics can significantly facilitate the selection of treatment plans to improve patient outcomes. In the present study, multi-form diagnostic methodologies were adopted, including next-generation sequencing-based actionable gene sequencing, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry, a circulating tumor cell (CTC) assay, flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte subsets and computed tomography, to improve disease management in an 86-year-old female patient with relapsed metastatic NSCLC. High expression of PD-L1, elevated CTC tmutations, were observed. Based on these results, the patient was initially treated with the programmed death protein 1 blocking antibody sintilimab for two cycles, resulting in the stabilization of their condition, although the patient still exhibited severe pain and other symptoms, including fatigue, malaise, a loss of appetite and poor mental state. Informed by dynamic monitoring of the patient's response to treatment, the treatment plan was subsequently adjusted to a combination therapy with sintilimab and autologous cytokine-induced killer cell infusion, which eventually led to improved outcomes in both the management of the cancer and quality of life. In conclusion, multi-omics analysis may be used to establish patient-tailored therapies to improve clinical outcomes in hard-to-treat elderly patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Case report: Robust response to sintilimab in advanced distal cholangiocarcinoma with PD-L1 expression and DNA damage repair

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly heterogeneous tumor that occurs in the bile duct epithelium; adenosquamous carcinoma is a rare pathological subtype of CCA. The clinical treatment of patients with metastatic distal CCA poses significant challenges. We report a 53-year-old female diagnosed with a stage III adenosquamous carcinomas of distal CCA. Metastasis occurred 4 months postoperatively and she was diagnosed with stage IV disease. The patient was treated with Gemcitabine + Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) and Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin (CAPEOX), followed by sintilimab monotherapy. After two cycles of treatment, the patient achieved partial response (PR) and the lesion continued to shrink. After 37 months of follow-up, the patient's liver metastasis had almost completely disappeared, and complete response (CR) was achieved. Moreover, she had more than 46 months of disease progression-free survival (PFS). Immunohistochemical testing showed high expression of PD-L1, and next-generation sequencing revealed the presence of mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the successful treatment of metastatic distal adenosquamous CCA with sintilimab alone. Remarkably, patients of CCA with high PD-L1 expression and DDR pathway gene mutations may benefit from sintilimab treatment.

Tumor microenvironment(TME) and single-source dual-energy CT(ssDECT) on assessment of inconformity between RECIST1.1 and pathological remission in neoadjuvant immunotherapy of NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The inconformity (IC) between pathological and imaging remissions after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC can affect the evaluation of curative effect of neoadjuvant therapy and the decision regarding the chance of surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who achieved disease control(CR/PR/SD) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy from a clinical trial (NCT04326153) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the same period were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent radical resection and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant treatments. The pathological remission, immunohistochemistry (CD4, CD8, CD20, CD56, FoxP3, CD68, CD163, CD11b tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, or macrophages), and single-source dual-energy computed tomography (ssDECT) scans were assessed. The IC between imaging remission by CT and pathological remission was investigated. The underlying cause of IC, the correlation between IC and DFS, and prognostic biomarkers were explored.

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant immunotherapy, enhanced immune killing and reduced immunosuppressive performance were observed. 70 % of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy patients were in high/medium IC level. Massive necrosis and repair around and inside the cancer nest were the main pathological changes observed 30-45 days post-treatment with PD1/PD-L1 antibody and were the main causes of IC between the pathology and imaging responses after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. High IC and preoperative CD8 expression (H score ≥ 3) indicate a high pathological response rate and prolonged DFS. Iodine material density ssDECT images showed that the iodine content in the lesion causes hyperattenuation in post-neoadjuvant lesion in PCR patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy was underestimated based on the RECIST criteria due to the unique antitumor therapeutic mechanism. Preoperative CD8+ expression and ssDECT predict this IC and evaluate the residual tumor cells. This is of great significance for screening immune beneficiaries and making more accurate judgments about the timing of surgery.

Genomic characteristics and immune landscape of super multiple primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In recent years, a growing number of patients with multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) are being diagnosed, and a subset of these patients is found to have a large number of lesions at the time of diagnosis, which are referred to as 'super MPLC'.

METHODS

Here, we perform whole exome sequencing (WES) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of PD-L1 and CD8 on 212 tumor samples from 42 patients with super MPLC.

FINDINGS

We report the genomic alteration landscape of super MPLC. EGFR, RBM10 and TP53 mutation and TERT amplification are important molecular events in the evolution of super MPLC. We propose the conception of early intrapulmonary metastasis, which exhibits different clinical features from conventional metastasis. The IHC analyses of PD-L1 and CD8 reveal a less inflamed microenvironment of super MPLC than that of traditional non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We identify the potentially susceptible germline mutations for super MPLC.

INTERPRETATION

Our study depicts the genomic characteristics and immune landscape, providing insights into the pathogenesis and possible therapeutic guidance of super MPLC.

FUNDING

A full list of funding bodies that supported this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy protocols and cycles for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This study evaluated the use of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy cycles and regimens for non-small cell lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Databases were searched for articles published up until December 2023. Data on the major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, and conversion to thoracotomy were collected. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the treatment regimens and cycles. Stata/MP software was used for statistical analyses.

Results

In total, 2430 individuals were assessed from 44 studies. Compared with those following neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.26/0.07/0.43/0.08, 95% CI: 0.18-0.34/0.04-0.10/0.28-0.58/0.04-0.14), the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy increased significantly (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.55/0.34/0.81/0.22, 95% CI: 0.48-0.63/0.28-0.41/0.69-0.90/0.13-0.33, P=0.001/0.002/0.009/0.034). No significant differences were found in the surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy. In the chemoimmunotherapy group, no statistically significant differences were found in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle, three-cycle and four-cycle groups (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.50;0.70;0.36/0.32;0.49;0.18/0.95;0.85;0.95/0.34;0.27;0.37, P=0.255/0.215/0.253/0.848). In the ICIs group, there was little change in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle group compared to the three-cycle group. (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.28;0.20/0.06;0.08/0.45;0.35/0.10;0.02, P=0.696/0.993/0.436/0.638). The neoadjuvant treatment cycle had no significant effect on surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy in both regimens.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly increased the rate of tumor pathological remission compared to neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone but also increased the incidence of TRAEs and SAEs. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy are found to be favorable when administered for a duration of three cycles, in comparison to both two and four cycles.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023407415.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for resectable NSCLC: subpopulation analysis of Chinese patients in CheckMate 816

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the global phase III CheckMate 816 study. Here, we report post hoc exploratory efficacy, safety, and surgical outcomes in the Chinese subpopulation of this study.

METHODS

Adults with stage IB-IIIA resectable NSCLC were randomized to receive nivolumab 360 mg plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone every 3 weeks for three cycles followed by surgery. Primary endpoints included EFS and pCR (both per blinded independent review). EFS and pCR results were from 14 October 2022, and 16 September 2020, database locks, respectively.

RESULTS

The Chinese subpopulation comprised 97 patients (nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 44; chemotherapy, 53). At 38.2 months of minimum follow-up, median EFS was not reached [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.4 months-not reached] in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm and 13.9 months (95% CI 8.3-34.3 months) in the chemotherapy arm (hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88). pCR rates were 25.0% (95% CI 13.2% to 40.3%) and 1.9% (95% CI 0.0% to 10.1%), respectively (odds ratio 11.05; 95% CI 1.41-86.49). Of 97 Chinese patients, 36 (82%) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm and 41 (77%) in the chemotherapy arm underwent definitive surgery. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18/43 patients (42%) treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 22/53 patients (42%) treated with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with findings in the global study population of CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy improved EFS and pCR versus chemotherapy in the Chinese subpopulation without impacting treatment tolerability or the feasibility of surgery. These findings support the use of nivolumab plus chemotherapy as a standard neoadjuvant treatment option for Chinese patients with resectable NSCLC.

Multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor reverses resistance to immunotherapy in hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma

Hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma (HSC) is characterized by its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. As of now, no universally endorsed standard therapeutic approaches for HSC have been established. Herein, we describe the case of a 60-year-old individual diagnosed with HSC, subsequently presenting with multiple metastases postoperatively. Owing to the pronounced expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), the individual was subjected to monotherapy utilizing sintilimab for a duration spanning 12 months. Following this regimen, a synergistic treatment approach comprising both anlotinib and sintilimab was instituted, culminating in an ensuing 11 months of efficacious therapeutic response. Throughout the course of treatment, the patient's quality of life remained satisfactory. This particular therapeutic strategy not merely reinforces the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in the realm of HSC management, but more pivotally, suggests that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) might counteract resistance to PD-1 antagonists, thus offering a potentially augmented treatment paradigm for HSC.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Building off of this, it has been hypothesized that the utilization of ICB early during the disease course may be advantageous, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting prior to definitive surgical resection. Preclinical studies have suggested that a more potent immune response may be induced by neoadjuvant ICB in the presence of a higher antigen burden and intact tumor draining lymph nodes. Recent clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant ICB with or without chemotherapy combinations in patients with resectable NSCLC led to improved pathological responses and longer event-free survival when neoadjuvant ICB was added to chemotherapy. Surgical outcomes were also supportive of this approach, with encouraging rates of pathological downstaging. Additionally, the availability of pre-treatment biopsy samples and post-treatment surgical resection tissues facilitates the conducting of correlative studies that continue to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance to ICB. As long-term survival outcomes from ongoing clinical trials are awaited, several important questions require further investigation, including the optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy, the clinical endpoints most predictive of long-term outcomes, and translational studies that should be investigated in future trial designs. Additionally, the optimal clinical management of patients with residual disease at the time of surgical resection and those who experience recurrence remains to be determined. In this review, we will (1) discuss the rationale behind neoadjuvant ICB-based therapy in NSCLC, (2) summarize the clinical data available thus far, and (3) highlight unanswered questions that need to be addressed in future studies to maximize the clinical benefits of this approach.

CD47: The Next Frontier in Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The success of PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapy in lung cancer has resulted in great enthusiasm for additional immunotherapies in development to elicit similar survival benefits, particularly in patients who do not respond to or are ineligible for PD-1 blockade. CD47 is an immunosuppressive molecule that binds SIRPα on antigen-presenting cells to regulate an innate immune checkpoint that blocks phagocytosis and subsequent activation of adaptive tumor immunity. In lung cancer, CD47 expression is associated with poor survival and tumors with EGFR mutations, which do not typically respond to PD-1 blockade. Given its prognostic relevance, its role in facilitating immune escape, and the number of agents currently in clinical development, CD47 blockade represents a promising next-generation immunotherapy for lung cancer. In this review, we briefly summarize how tumors disrupt the cancer immunity cycle to facilitate immune evasion and their exploitation of immune checkpoints like the CD47-SIRPα axis. We also discuss approved immune checkpoint inhibitors and strategies for targeting CD47 that are currently being investigated. Finally, we review the literature supporting CD47 as a promising immunotherapeutic target in lung cancer and offer our perspective on key obstacles that must be overcome to establish CD47 blockade as the next standard of care for lung cancer therapy.

Safety and clinical efficacy of sintilimab (anti-PD-1) in pediatric patients with advanced or recurrent malignancies in a phase I study

The aim of this phase I study is to evaluate, for the first time, the safety and efficacy of sintilimab in pediatric patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent malignancies. During the dose escalation phase, patients received a single intravenous infusion of sintilimab at varying doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg. The primary endpoints included the identification of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) as well as the evaluation of safety and tolerance. Secondary endpoints focused on assessing objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 29 patients were enrolled, including 10 individuals diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 19 patients with various other tumor categories. Notably, diverse pathological types such as thymoma, choroid plexus carcinoma, and NK/T-cell lymphoma were also included in the study cohort. By the safety data cutoff, most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurring in 10% of patients. Among the 27 evaluated subjects, four achieved confirmed complete response (CR) while seven patients exhibited confirmed partial response (PR). Additionally, seven patients maintained disease (SD) during the study period. Notably, sintilimab demonstrated remarkable tolerability without DLTs and exhibited promising anti-tumor effects in pediatric HL. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted in 15 patients to assess the mutational landscape and copy number variation (CNV) status. The completion of this phase I study establishes the foundation for potential combination regimens involving sintilimab in childhood cancer treatment. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04400851.

Immune-checkpoint inhibition for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer - opportunities and challenges

Therapeutic strategies harnessing the immune system to eliminate tumour cells have been successfully used for several cancer types, including in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In these patients, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can provide durable responses and improve overall survival either as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy or other immunotherapeutic agents. However, the implementation of ICIs in early stage NSCLC has been hampered by the continuous struggle to develop robust end points to assess their efficacy in this setting, especially those enabling a fast and reproducible evaluation of the clinical activity of neoadjuvant strategies. Several trials are testing ICIs, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in early stage NSCLC as an adjuvant, neoadjuvant or perioperative approach. As a novelty, most trials in the neoadjuvant setting have adopted pathological response as a primary end point. ICIs have been approved for use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings on the basis of event-free survival and disease-free survival benefit, respectively; however, the correlation of these end points with overall survival remains unclear in these settings. Unresolved challenges for the optimal use of ICIs with curative intent include concerns about their applicability in daily clinical practice and about improving patient selection based on predictive biomarkers or assessment of pathological response and minimal residual disease. In this Review, we discuss the rationale, available strategies and current trial landscape for the implementation of ICIs in patients with resectable NSCLC, and we further elaborate on future approaches to optimize their clinical benefit.

Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals transcriptional heterogeneity of multiple primary lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

With the advancements in early diagnosis, more and more patients with multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) have been identified. However, the progression of MPLC involves complex changes in cell composition and metabolic function, which remains largely controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to comprehensively reveal the cellular characteristics and inter-cellular connections of MPLC.

METHODS

We performed scRNA-seq from 23 samples of six MPLC patients, combined with bulk whole-exome sequencing. We performed trajectory analysis to investigate the transition of different cell types during the development of MPLC.

RESULTS

A total of 1 67 397 cells were sequenced derived from tumour and adjacent tissues of MPLC patients, and tumour, normal, immune and stromal cells were identified. Two states of epithelial cells were identified, which were associated with immune response and cell death, respectively. Furthermore, both CD8+ naïve and memory T cells participated in the differentiation of CD8+ T cells. The terminal states of CD8+ T cells were exhausted T cells and cytotoxic T cells, which positively regulated cell death and were implicated in the regulation of cytokine production, respectively. Two main subpopulations of B cells with distinct functions were identified, which participate in the regulation of the immune response and antigen presentation, respectively. In addition, we found a specific type of endothelial cells that were abundant in tumour samples, with an increasing trend from normal to tumour samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed the comprehensive landscape of different cells of MPLC, which might reveal the key cellular mechanisms and, therefore, may provide new insights into the early diagnosis and treatment of MPLC.

Plasma extracellular vesicle long RNAs predict response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has brought new hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited by the lack of clinically feasible markers, it is still difficult to select NSCLC patients who respond well and to predict patients' clinical outcomes before the treatment. Before the treatment, we isolated plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) from three cohorts (discovery, training and validation) of 78 NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. To identify differentially-expressed EV long RNAs (exLRs), we employed RNA-seq in the discovery cohort. And we subsequently used qRT-PCR to establish and validate the predictive signature in the other two cohorts. We have identified 8 candidate exLRs from 27 top-ranked exLRs differentially expressed between responders and non-responders, and tested their expression with qRT-PCR in the training cohort. We finally identified H3C2 (P = 0.029), MALAT1 (P = 0.043) and RPS3 (P = 0.0086) significantly expressed in responders for establishing the predictive signature. Integrated with PD-L1 expression, our signature performed well in predicting immunotherapeutic responses in the training (AUC=0.892) and validation cohorts (AUC=0.747). Furthermore, our signature was proven to be a predictor for favorable prognosis of patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, which demonstrates the feasibility of our signature in clinical practices (P = 0.048). Our results demonstrate that the exLR-based signature could accurately predict responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A system review

With the addition of immunotherapy, lung cancer, one of the most common cancers with high mortality rates, has broadened the treatment landscape. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are now used as the first-line therapy for metastatic disease, consolidation therapy after radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease, and adjuvant therapy after surgical resection and chemotherapy for resectable disease. The use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, however, is still debatable. We will address several aspects, namely the initial efficacy of monotherapy, the efficacy of combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy-related biomarkers, adverse effects, ongoing randomized controlled trials, and current issues and future directions for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC will be discussed here.

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.

Results

Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).

Conclusion

RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.

Utility of 18F-FDG uptake in predicting major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non‑small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of present study was to investigate the efficiency of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in predicting major pathological response (MPR) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients with stage I-IIIB NSCLC were retrospectively derived from National Cancer Center of China, of which 36 cases received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy (I-M) and 68 cases with ICI combination therapy (I-C). ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT scans were performed at baseline and after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted and area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for biomarkers including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), inflammatory biomarkers, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) and iRECIST.

RESULTS

Fifty-four resected NSCLC tumors achieved MPR (51.9%, 54/104). In both neoadjuvant I-M and I-C cohorts, post-NAT SUVmax and the percentage changes of SUVmax (ΔSUVmax%) were significantly lower in the patients with MPR versus non-MPR (p < 0.01), and were also negatively correlated with the degree of pathological regression (p < 0.01). The AUC of ΔSUVmax% for predicting MPR was respectively 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00-1.00) in neoadjuvant I-M cohort and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86-1.00) in I-C cohort. Baseline SUVmax had a statistical prediction value for MPR only in I-M cohort, with an AUC up to 0.76 at the threshold of 17.0. ΔSUVmax% showed an obvious advantage in MPR prediction over inflammatory biomarkers, TMB, PD-L1 TPS and iRECIST.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG uptake can predict MPR in NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) is a rapidly emerging paradigm for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objectives of this PRISMA/MOOSE/PICOD-guided systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to assess the safety and efficacy of nIT, (2) to compare the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) versus chemotherapy alone (nCT), and (3) to explore predictors of pathologic response with nIT and their association with outcomes.

METHODS

Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and the receipt of programmed death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 inhibitors before resection; other forms and modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. For statistical analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model was used, depending on the heterogeneity (I2 ).

RESULTS

Sixty-six articles met the criteria (eight randomized studies, 39 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 19 retrospective studies). The pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 28.1%. The estimated grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 18.0%. Compared with nCT, nCIT achieved higher rates of pCR (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49-12.97; p < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.67; p < .001), and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.74; p = .0003) but yielded similar toxicity rates (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67-1.52; p = .97). The results remained robust on sensitivity analysis when all retrospective publications were removed. pCR was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.25; 0.15-0.43; p < .001) and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.67; p = .005). PD-L1 expressors (≥1%) were more likely to achieve a pCR (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.22-7.03; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was safe and efficacious. nCIT improved pathologic response rates and PFS/OS over nCT, particularly in patients who had tumors that expressed PD-L1, without increasing toxicities.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This meta-analysis of 66 studies showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer is safe and efficacious. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoimmunotherapy improved pathologic response rates and survival, particularly for patients who had tumors that expressed programmed cell death ligand-1, without increasing toxicities.

Comparing a PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced ESCC: a randomized Phase II clinical trial : A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant therapy for ESCC

BACKGROUND

A Phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant socazolimab, a novel PD-L1 inhibitor, in combination with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were randomly divided between the Socazolimab + nab-paclitaxel + cisplatin (TP) arm (n = 32) and the control arm (n = 32), receiving either socazolimab (5 mg/kg intravenously (IV), day 1) or a placebo with nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2 IV, day 1/8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 IV, day 1) repeated every 21 days for four cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR), and the secondary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 29 (90.6%) patients in each arm underwent surgery, and 29 (100%) and 28 (98.6%) patients underwent R0 resection in the Socazolimab + TP and Placebo + TP arms, respectively. The MPR rates were 69.0 and 62.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 49.1-84.0% vs. 42.4-78.7%, P = 0.509), and the pCR rates were 41.4 and 27.6% (95% CI: 24.1-60.9% vs. 13.5-47.5%, P = 0.311) in the Socazolimab + TP and Placebo + TP arms, respectively. Significantly higher incidence rates of ypT0 (37.9% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.001) and T downstaging were observed in the Socazolimab + TP arm than in the Placebo + TP arm. The EFS and OS outcomes were not mature.

CONCLUSIONS

The neoadjuvant socazolimab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising MPR and pCR rates and significant T downstaging in locally advanced ESCC without increasing surgical complication rates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration name (on clinicaltrials.gov): A Study of Anti-PD-L1 Antibody in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04460066.

Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) inhibition combined with immunotherapy therapy for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a highly malignant tumor with invasive nature. Most patients present with locally advanced and/or distant metastatic diseases that are difficult to treat. We report a case of a previously inoperable patient with v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutated ATC. After a trial of neoadjuvant Dabrafenib/Trametinib with immunotherapy, the tumor became operable, and surgical pathology indicated a pathologic complete response (pCR). We also reviewed cases from the literature that utilized neoadjuvant BRAF-directed therapy in ATCs. These cases emphasize that BRAF-and immune-directed therapy is a feasible option in patients with inoperable ATC and may lead to improved outcomes.

Progress and perspectives of perioperative immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Lung cancer mortality has decreased over the past decade, which is partly attributed to improved treatments. Curative surgery for patients with early-stage lung cancer is the standard of care, but not all surgical treatments have a good prognosis. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are used to improve the prognosis of patients with resectable lung cancer. Immunotherapy, an epoch-defining treatment, has improved curative effects, prognosis, and tolerability compared with traditional and ordinary cytotoxic chemotherapy, providing new hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy-related clinical trials have reported encouraging clinical outcomes in their exploration of different types of perioperative immunotherapy, from neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neoadjuvant immune-combination therapy (chemoimmunotherapy, immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy plus radiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy), adjuvant immunotherapy, and neoadjuvant combined adjuvant immunotherapy. Phase 3 studies such as IMpower 010 and CheckMate 816 reported survival benefits of perioperative immunotherapy for operable patients. This review summarizes up-to-date clinical studies and analyzes the efficiency and feasibility of different neoadjuvant therapies and biomarkers to identify optimal types of perioperative immunotherapy for NSCLC.

The survival outcomes of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with chemotherapy has been reported to improve the pathological response of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the systematic report on survival follow-up is quite few. This study we will report the survival follow-up outcomes after a median follow-up of 21.1 months.

Methods

This was a real-world retrospective study. Locally advanced ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and nedaplatin followed by surgery and completed at least 1-year follow-up were reviewed. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) at 24 months. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 24 months.

Results

Ninety eligible patients were included in the analysis between July 2019 and October 2021. The median number of neoadjuvant cycles was 3 (range 2-4). All patients achieved R0 resection. With a median follow-up of 21.1 months (range 14.0-39.0), the median DFS and median OS had not reached, 2-year DFS rate was 78.3% (95%CI 68.8%-89.1%) and 2-years OS rate was 88.0% (95%CI 80.6%-96.0%). Postoperative pathological stage, pCR, MPR, tumor down-staging were significantly correlated with favorable survival outcome. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis identified cycle number of neoadjuvant treatment as independent predictor of DFS.

Conclusion

Our results preliminarily show a survival benefit of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced ESCC.

Association between radiotherapy and risk of second primary malignancies in patients with resectable lung cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The most common form of treatment for non-metastatic lung cancer is surgery-based combination therapy, which may also include adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are uncommon but significant radiation side effects in patients with resectable lung cancer, and SPMs have not been adequately investigated. Our study aims to assess the correlations of radiotherapy with the development of SPMs in patients with resectable lung cancer.

METHODS

We screened for any primary malignancy that occurred more than five years after the diagnosis of resectable lung cancer. Based on the large cohort of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, radiotherapy-correlated risks were estimated using the Poisson regression analysis and the cumulative incidence of SPMs was calculated using Fine-Gray competing risk regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 62,435 patients with non-metastatic lung cancer undergoing surgery, a total of 11,341 (18.16%) patients have received radiotherapy. Our findings indicated that radiotherapy was substantially related to a high risk of main second solid malignancies (RR = 1.21; 95%CI, 1.08 to 1.35) and a negligible risk of main second hematologic malignancies (RR = 1.08; 95%CI, 0.84 to 1.37). With the greatest number of patients, the risk of acquiring a second primary gastrointestinal cancer was the highest overall (RR = 1.77; 95 percent CI, 1.44 to 2.15). The cumulative incidence and standardized incidence ratios of SPMs revealed similar findings. Furthermore, the young and the elderly may be more vulnerable, and the highest risk of acquiring most SPMs was seen more than ten years after lung cancer diagnosis. Additionally, more attention should be paid to the second primary gastrointestinal cancer in young individuals with resectable lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

After receiving radiotherapy, an increased risk of developing second primary solid and gastrointestinal cancers was observed for patients with resectable lung cancer. The prevention of SPMs associated with radiotherapy requires further attention.

Assessing the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung squamous carcinoma using artificial intelligence neural network

Background

At present, immunotherapy is a very promising treatment method for lung cancer patients, while the factors affecting response are still controversial. It is crucial to predict the efficacy of lung squamous carcinoma patients who received immunotherapy.

Methods

In our retrospective study, we enrolled lung squamous carcinoma patients who received immunotherapy at Beijing Chest Hospital from January 2017 to November 2021. All patients were grouped into two cohorts randomly, the training cohort (80% of the total) and the test cohort (20% of the total). The training cohort was used to build neural network models to assess the efficacy and outcome of immunotherapy in lung squamous carcinoma based on clinical information. The main outcome was the disease control rate (DCR), and then the secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 289 patients were included in this study. The DCR model had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.9526 (95%CI, 0.9088-0.9879) in internal validation and 0.9491 (95%CI, 0.8704-1.0000) in external validation. The ORR model had AUC of 0.8030 (95%CI, 0.7437-0.8545) in internal validation and 0.7040 (95%CI, 0.5457-0.8379) in external validation. The PFS model had AUC of 0.8531 (95%CI, 0.8024-0.8975) in internal validation and 0.7602 (95%CI, 0.6236-0.8733) in external validation. The OS model had AUC of 0.8006 (95%CI, 0.7995-0.8017) in internal validation and 0.7382 (95%CI, 0.7366-0.7398) in external validation.

Conclusions

The neural network models show benefits in the efficacy evaluation of immunotherapy to lung squamous carcinoma patients, especially the DCR and ORR models. In our retrospective study, we found that neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy may bring greater efficacy benefits to patients.

Dramatic response to neoadjuvant savolitinib in marginally resectable lung adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping mutation: A case report and literature review

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) is a low-frequency driver mutation in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (3%-4%) and is associated with a poor prognosis. With the advent of selective MET inhibitors such as capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib, the outcome for these patients was significantly improved. Here, we report a 76-year-old male patient with marginally resectable stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14 who was successfully treated with savolitinib for neoadjuvant therapy. An 82% shrinkage of the primary tumor was observed, and only 5% of the tumor was viable by pathology in the following radical surgery. A dozen of studies tested the efficiency of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy, but for NSCLC with driver mutations, neoadjuvant targeted therapy might be more appropriate. We advocated the neoadjuvant MET TKI treatment for NSCLC.

Correlation between PD-L1 expression and radiomic features in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass nodules

Background

Immunotherapy might be a promising auxiliary or alternative systemic treatment for early-stage lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs). This study intended to investigate the PD-L1 expression in these patients, and to explore the non-invasive prediction model of PD-L1 expression based on radiomics.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the PD-L1 expression of patients with postoperative pathological diagnosis of lung adenocarcinomas and with imaging manifestation of GGNs, and divided patients into positive group and negative group according to whether PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Then, CT-based radiomic features were extracted semi-automatically, and feature dimensions were reduced by univariate analysis and LASSO in the randomly selected training cohort (70%). Finally, we used logistic regression algorithm to establish the radiomic models and the clinical-radiomic combined models for PD-L1 expression prediction, and evaluated the prediction efficiency of the models with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

A total of 839 “GGN-like lung adenocarcinoma” patients were included, of which 226 (26.9%) showed positive PD-L1 expression. 779 radiomic features were extracted, and 9 of them were found to be highly corelated with PD-L1 expression. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the radiomic models were 0.653 and 0.583 in the training cohort and test cohort respectively. After adding clinically significant and statistically significant clinical features, the efficacy of the combined model was slightly improved, and the AUC values were 0.693 and 0.598 respectively.

Conclusions

GGN-like lung adenocarcinoma had a fairly high positive PD-L1 expression rate. Radiomics was a hopeful noninvasive method for predicting PD-L1 expression, with better predictive efficacy in combination with clinical features.