1
|
Dahl DM, Wu S, Lin SX, Hu M, Barney AA, Kim MM, Cornejo KM, Harisinghani MG, Feldman AS, Wu CL. Clinical significance of prostate cancer identified by transperineal standard template biopsy in men with nonsuspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:28.e21-28.e28. [PMID: 38182499 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). However, whether a negative mpMRI in patients with a clinical suspicion of CaP can omit a confirmatory biopsy remains less understood and without consensus. Transperineal (TP) standard template biopsy (SBx) provides an effective approach to CaP detection. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the CaP characteristics detected through TP SBx that are systematically overlooked by mpMRI. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of all men who underwent prebiopsy mpMRI and subsequent a 20-core TP SBx at our hospital from September 2019 to February 2021. Patients with suspicious mpMRI received a combined TP SBx and targeted biopsy (TBx) (suspicious group), while those without suspicious (negative) mpMRI and who proceeded to biopsy, received TP SBx only (nonsuspicious group). A negative mpMRI was defined as the absence of suspicious findings and/or the presence of low-risk areas with a PI-RADS score of ≤2. Subsequently, we compared and evaluated the clinical and biopsy characteristics between these 2 groups. RESULTS We identified 301 men in suspicious group and 215 men in nonsuspicious group. The overall CaP detection rate and csCaP detection rate by TP SBx were 74.1%, 38.9% for suspicious group and 43.3%, 14.9% for nonsuspicious group, respectively. csCaP NPV of mpMRI was 85.1% with a csCaP prevalence 28.9%. The greatest percentage of cancer involvement (GPC) in biopsy core from nonsuspicious group was significantly lower than those of suspicious group (40% vs. 50%, p = 0.005), In multivariate logistic analysis, only PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cc was identified as an independent and significant predictor of csCaP in nonsuspicious group. CONCLUSION Within our cohort, false-negative rates of mpMRI for csCaP are substantial, reaching 15%. Nonsuspicious cases may contain a large volume tumor since the high GPC of SBx. For cases with nonsuspicious imaging and higher PSAD, a confirmatory biopsy may be necessary due to the increased risk of missed csCaP by mpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas M Dahl
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shulin Wu
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sharron X Lin
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mengjie Hu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alfred A Barney
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kristine M Cornejo
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mukesh G Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lehner F, Crippa A, Sigg S, Eberli D, Mortezavi A. Transperineal template saturation and conventional biopsy for stage prediction in prostate cancer. BJU Int 2023; 132:696-704. [PMID: 37704215 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of risk calculators (RCs) predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) and extraprostatic extension (EPE) in men undergoing transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-fusion template saturation biopsy (TTSB) and conventional systematic TRUS-guided biopsy (SB). PATIENTS AND METHODS The RCs were tested in a consecutive cohort of 645 men undergoing radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic LN dissection between 2005 and 2019. TTSB was performed in 230 (35.7%) and SB in 415 (64.3%) men. Risk of LNI and EPE was calculated using the available RCs. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness stratified by different biopsy techniques were assessed. RESULTS Lymph node invasion was observed in 23 (10%) and EPE in 73 (31.8%) of cases with TTSB and 53 (12.8%) and 158 (38%) with SB, respectively. RCs showed an excellent discrimination and acceptable calibration for prediction of LNI based on TTSB (area under the curve [AUC]/risk estimation: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC]-RC 0.79/-4%, Briganti (2012)-RC 0.82/-4%, Gandaglia-RC 0.81/+6%). These were comparable in SB (MSKCC-RC 0.78/+2%; Briganti (2012)-RC 0.77/-3%). Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed a net benefit at threshold probabilities between 3% and 6% when TTSB was used. For prediction of EPE based on TTSB an inferior discrimination and variable calibration were observed (AUC/risk estimation: MSKCC-RC 0.71/+8% and Martini (2018)-RC 0.69/+2%) achieving a net benefit on DCA only at risk thresholds of >17%. Performance of RCs for prediction of LNI and EPE based on SB showed comparable results with a better performance in the DCA for LNI (risk thresholds 1-2%) and poorer performance for EPE (risk threshold >20%). This study is limited by its retrospective single-institution design. CONCLUSIONS The potentially more accurate grading ability of TTSB did not result in improved performance of preoperative RCs. Prediction tools for LNI proved clinical usefulness while RCs for EPE did not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Lehner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessio Crippa
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Silvan Sigg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ashkan Mortezavi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomioka M, Seike K, Uno H, Asano N, Watanabe H, Tomioka-Inagawa R, Kawase M, Kato D, Takai M, Iinuma K, Tobisawa Y, Nakane K, Tsuchiya K, Ito T, Koie T. Perilesional Targeted Biopsy Combined with MRI-TRUS Image Fusion-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy: An Analysis According to PI-RADS Scores. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2608. [PMID: 37568971 PMCID: PMC10417101 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A prostate-targeted biopsy (TB) core is usually collected from a site where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicates possible cancer. However, the extent of the lesion is difficult to accurately predict using MRI or TB alone. Therefore, we performed several biopsies around the TB site (perilesional [p] TB) and analyzed the association between the positive cores obtained using TB and pTB and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores. This retrospective study included patients who underwent prostate biopsies. The extent of pTB was defined as the area within 10 mm of a TB site. A total of 162 eligible patients were enrolled. Prostate cancer (PCa) was diagnosed in 75.2% of patients undergoing TB, with a positivity rate of 50.7% for a PI-RADS score of 3, 95.8% for a PI-RADS score of 4, and 100% for a PI-RADS score of 5. Patients diagnosed with PCa according to both TB and pTB had significantly higher positivity rates for PI-RADS scores of 4 and 5 than for a PI-RADS score of 3 (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Additional pTB may be performed in patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 regions of interest for assessing PCa malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tomioka
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Kensaku Seike
- Department of Urology, Chuno Kousei Hospital, 5-1 Wakakusadori, Seki 5013802, Japan; (K.S.); (H.U.)
| | - Hiromi Uno
- Department of Urology, Chuno Kousei Hospital, 5-1 Wakakusadori, Seki 5013802, Japan; (K.S.); (H.U.)
| | - Nami Asano
- Department of Pathology, Chuno Kousei Hospital, 5-1 Wakakusadori, Seki 5013802, Japan;
| | - Haruo Watanabe
- Department of Radiology, Chuno Kousei Hospital, 5-1 Wakakusadori, Seki 5013802, Japan;
| | - Risa Tomioka-Inagawa
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Daiki Kato
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Manabu Takai
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| | | | - Takayasu Ito
- Center for Clinical Training and Career Development, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan;
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan; (M.T.); (R.T.-I.); (M.K.); (D.K.); (M.T.); (K.I.); (Y.T.); (K.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thulasi Seetha S, Garanzini E, Tenconi C, Marenghi C, Avuzzi B, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Villa S, Chiorda BN, Badenchini F, Bertocchi E, Sanduleanu S, Pignoli E, Procopio G, Valdagni R, Rancati T, Nicolai N, Messina A. Stability of Multi-Parametric Prostate MRI Radiomic Features to Variations in Segmentation. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1172. [PMID: 37511785 PMCID: PMC10381192 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Stability analysis remains a fundamental step in developing a successful imaging biomarker to personalize oncological strategies. This study proposes an in silico contour generation method for simulating segmentation variations to identify stable radiomic features. Ground-truth annotation provided for the whole prostate gland on the multi-parametric MRI sequences (T2w, ADC, and SUB-DCE) were perturbed to mimic segmentation differences observed among human annotators. In total, we generated 15 synthetic contours for a given image-segmentation pair. One thousand two hundred twenty-four unfiltered/filtered radiomic features were extracted applying Pyradiomics, followed by stability assessment using ICC(1,1). Stable features identified in the internal population were then compared with an external population to discover and report robust features. Finally, we also investigated the impact of a wide range of filtering strategies on the stability of features. The percentage of unfiltered (filtered) features that remained robust subjected to segmentation variations were T2w-36% (81%), ADC-36% (94%), and SUB-43% (93%). Our findings suggest that segmentation variations can significantly impact radiomic feature stability but can be mitigated by including pre-filtering strategies as part of the feature extraction pipeline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sithin Thulasi Seetha
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (S.T.S.); (R.V.)
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Enrico Garanzini
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Chiara Tenconi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Marenghi
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Sergio Villa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Barbara Noris Chiorda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Elena Bertocchi
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Sebastian Sanduleanu
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (S.T.S.); (R.V.)
- Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Data Science Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Antonella Messina
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.G.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu J, Zhu A, Vickers A, Allaf ME, Ehdaie B, Schaeffer A, Pavlovich C, Ross AE, Green DA, Wang G, Ginzburg S, Montgomery JS, George A, Graham JN, Ristau BT, Correa A, Shoag JE, Kowalczyk KJ, Zhang TR, Schaeffer EM. Protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing transperineal prostate biopsy to reduce infectiouscomplications. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071191. [PMID: 37208135 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately one million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA, and most are performed using a transrectal approach under local anaesthesia. The risk of postbiopsy infection is increasing due to increasing antibiotic resistance of rectal flora. Single-centre studies suggest that a clean, percutaneous transperineal approach to prostate biopsy may have a lower risk of infection. To date, there is no high-level evidence comparing transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy. We hypothesise that transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia has a significantly lower risk of infection, similar pain/discomfort levels and comparable detection of non-low-grade prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will perform a multicentre, prospective randomised clinical trial to compare transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen in the first biopsy, prior negative biopsy and active surveillance biopsy setting. Prostate MRI will be performed prior to biopsy, and targeted biopsy will be conducted for suspicious MRI lesions in addition to systematic biopsy (12 cores). Approximately 1700 men will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to transperineal versus transrectal biopsy. A streamlined design to collect data and to determine trial eligibility along with the two-stage consent process will be used to facilitate subject recruitment and retention. The primary outcome is postbiopsy infection, and secondary outcomes include other adverse events (bleeding, urinary retention), pain/discomfort/anxiety and critically, detection of non-low-grade (grade group ≥2) prostate cancer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Institutional Review Board of the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York approved the research protocol (protocol number #18-02-365, approved 20 April 2020). The results of the trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04815876.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Hu
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anthony Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Christian Pavlovich
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David A Green
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gerald Wang
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Serge Ginzburg
- Einstein Urology, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Montgomery
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Arvin George
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - John N Graham
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Benjamin T Ristau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andres Correa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Keith J Kowalczyk
- Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Tenny R Zhang
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - E M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Index lesion contouring on prostate MRI for targeted MRI/US fusion biopsy - Evaluation of mismatch between radiologists and urologists. Eur J Radiol 2023; 162:110763. [PMID: 36898172 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mistargeting of focal lesions due to inaccurate segmentations can lead to false-negative findings on MRI-guided targeted biopsies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine inter-reader agreement of prostate index lesion segmentations from actual biopsy data between urologists and radiologists. METHOD Consecutive patients undergoing transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. Agreement between segmentations on T2w-images between urologists and radiologists was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95 % Hausdorff distance (95 % HD). Differences in similarity scores were compared using Wilcoxon test. Differences depending on lesion features (size, zonal location, PI-RADS scores, lesion distinctness) were tested with Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation with prostate signal-intensity homogeneity score (PSHS) and lesion size was tested with Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS Ninety-three patients (mean age 64.9 ± 7.1y, median serum PSA 6.5 [4.33-10.00]) were included. Mean similarity scores were statistically significantly lower between urologists and radiologists compared to radiologists only (DSC 0.41 ± 0.24 vs. 0.59 ± 0.23, p < 0.01; 95 %HD 6.38 ± 5.45 mm vs. 4.47 ± 4.12 mm, p < 0.01). There was a moderate and strong positive correlation between DSC scores and lesion size for segmentations from urologists and radiologists (ρ = 0.331, p = 0.002) and radiologists only (ρ = 0.501, p < 0.001). Similarity scores were worse in lesions ≤ 10 mm while other lesion features did not significantly influence similarity scores. CONCLUSION There is significant mismatch of prostate index lesion segmentations between urologists and radiologists. Segmentation agreement positively correlates with lesion size. PI-RADS scores, zonal location, lesion distinctness, and PSHS show no significant impact on segmentation agreement. These findings could underpin benefits of perilesional biopsies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Orlando N, Edirisinghe C, Gyacskov I, Vickress J, Sachdeva R, Gomez JA, D'Souza D, Velker V, Mendez LC, Bauman G, Fenster A, Hoover DA. Validation of a surface-based deformable MRI-3D ultrasound image registration algorithm toward clinical implementation for interstitial prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:199-209. [PMID: 36641305 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate and clinically implement a deformable surface-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to three-dimensional ultrasound (US) image registration algorithm for prostate brachytherapy (BT) with the aim to reduce operator dependence and facilitate dose escalation to an MRI-defined target. METHODS AND MATERIALS Our surface-based deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm first translates and scales to align the US- and MR-defined prostate surfaces, followed by deformation of the MR-defined prostate surface to match the US-defined prostate surface. The algorithm performance was assessed in a phantom using three deformation levels, followed by validation in three retrospective high-dose-rate BT clinical cases. For comparison, manual rigid registration and cognitive fusion by physician were also employed. Registration accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and target registration error (TRE) for embedded spherical landmarks. The algorithm was then implemented intraoperatively in a prospective clinical case. RESULTS In the phantom, our DIR algorithm demonstrated a mean DSC and TRE of 0.74 ± 0.08 and 0.94 ± 0.49 mm, respectively, significantly improving the performance compared to manual rigid registration with 0.64 ± 0.16 and 1.88 ± 1.24 mm, respectively. Clinical results demonstrated reduced variability compared to the current standard of cognitive fusion by physicians. CONCLUSIONS We successfully validated a DIR algorithm allowing for translation of MR-defined target and organ-at-risk contours into the intraoperative environment. Prospective clinical implementation demonstrated the intraoperative feasibility of our algorithm, facilitating targeted biopsies and dose escalation to the MR-defined lesion. This method provides the potential to standardize the registration procedure between physicians, reducing operator dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Orlando
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Igor Gyacskov
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason Vickress
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Sachdeva
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jose A Gomez
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David D'Souza
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vikram Velker
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lucas C Mendez
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Fenster
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas A Hoover
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tavakoli AA, Hielscher T, Badura P, Görtz M, Kuder TA, Gnirs R, Schwab C, Hohenfellner M, Schlemmer HP, Bonekamp D. Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2023; 306:186-199. [PMID: 35972360 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0 requires multiparametric MRI of the prostate, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging sequences; however, the contribution of DCE imaging remains unclear. Purpose To assess whether DCE imaging in addition to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized T2 values improves PI-RADS version 2.0 for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, clinically reported PI-RADS lesions in consecutive men who underwent 3-T multiparametric MRI (T2-weighted, DWI, and DCE MRI) from May 2015 to September 2016 were analyzed quantitatively and compared with systematic and targeted MRI-transrectal US fusion biopsy. The normalized T2 signal (nT2), ADC measurement, mean early-phase DCE signal (mDCE), and heuristic DCE parameters were calculated. Logistic regression analysis indicated the most predictive DCE parameters for csPCa (Gleason grade group ≥2). Receiver operating characteristic parameter models were compared using the Obuchowski test. Recursive partitioning analysis determined ADC and mDCE value ranges for combined use with PI-RADS. Results Overall, 260 men (median age, 64 years [IQR, 58-69 years]) with 432 lesions (csPCa [n = 152] and no csPCa [n = 280]) were included. The mDCE parameter was predictive of csPCa when accounting for the ADC and nT2 parameter in the peripheral zone (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI: 1.30, 2.44; P = .001) but not the transition zone (OR, 1.17; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.69; P = .41). Recursive partitioning analysis selected an ADC cutoff of 0.897 × 10-3 mm2/sec (P = .04) as a classifier for peripheral zone lesions with a PI-RADS score assessed on the ADC map (hereafter, ADC PI-RADS) of 3. The mDCE parameter did not differentiate ADC PI-RADS 3 lesions (P = .11), but classified lesions with ADC PI-RADS scores greater than 3 with low ADC values (less than 0.903 × 10-3 mm2/sec, P < .001) into groups with csPCa rates of 70% and 97% (P = .008). A lesion size cutoff of 1.5 cm and qualitative DCE parameters were not defined as classifiers according to recursive partitioning (P > .05). Conclusion Quantitative or qualitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was not relevant for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesion risk stratification, while quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were helpful in upgrading PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 4 lesions. Quantitative ADC measurement may be more important for risk stratification than current methods in future versions of PI-RADS. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Goh in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anoshirwan Andrej Tavakoli
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Badura
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Görtz
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Anselm Kuder
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Regula Gnirs
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Schwab
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- From the Department of Radiology (E010) (A.A.T., P.B., R.G., H.P.S., D.B.), Division of Biostatistics (T.H.), and Department of Medical Physics (T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Urology (M.G., M.H.) and Institute of Pathology (C.S.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hsi RA, Dinh T, Greer M, Bensen C, Mitchell MA, Li AY, Stamm A, Henne M. Performance of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging validated by targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies. BJUI COMPASS 2022; 4:96-103. [PMID: 36569501 PMCID: PMC9766867 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To measure the performance of multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify intraprostatic tumour deposits using a systematic and targeted MR-guided transperineal prostate biopsy technique. Materials and Methods Patients underwent a combined systematic and targeted MR-guided transperineal biopsy procedure in the dorsal lithotomy position under general anaesthesia. Systematic biopsies were spaced 10 mm or less apart and additional biopsies targeted any Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3, 4 or 5 lesions identified on mpMRI. Cancer detection rates were calculated on a per patient and per lesion basis. Results A total of 125 patients underwent the biopsy procedure. The positive predictive value (PPV) of mpMRI per patient was 59% for any cancer and 49% for Gleason score (GS) ≥ 7 cancer. The negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI per patient was 67% for any cancer and 88% for GS ≥ 7 cancer. On a per lesion basis, the PPV of PI-RADS 3 lesions for any and GS ≥ 7 cancer was 24% and 10%. For PI-RADS 4 lesions it was 42% and 32%. For PI-RADS 5 lesions, it was 76% and 70%. MpMRI failed to identify GS ≥ 7 cancer found on systematic biopsy in 22% of patients. Conclusion Based on a combination of systematic and targeted transperineal prostate biopsies, mpMRI showed a high NPV and low PPV for GS ≥ 7 cancer on a per patient basis. The PPV of mpMRI on a per lesion basis increased with increasing PI-RADS score. However, there were a significant number of both false positive as well as false negative (mpMRI invisible) areas within the prostate that contained GS ≥ 7 cancer. Therefore, pathologic confirmation using both targeted and systematic mapping biopsy is necessary to accurately identify all intraprostatic tumour deposits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A. Hsi
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance PeninsulaPoulsboWashingtonUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Amy Y. Li
- The Doctors ClinicSilverdaleWashingtonUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kornienko K, Reuter M, Maxeiner A, Günzel K, Kittner B, Reimann M, Hofbauer SL, Wiemer LE, Heckmann R, Asbach P, Wendler JJ, Schostak M, Schlomm T, Friedersdorff F, Cash H. Follow-up of men with a PI-RADS 4/5 lesion after negative MRI/Ultrasound fusion biopsy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:13603. [PMID: 35948575 PMCID: PMC9365776 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging/Ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion targeted biopsy (TB) in combination with a systematic biopsy (SB) improves cancer detection but limited data is available how to manage patients with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥ 4 lesion and a negative biopsy. We evaluate the real-world management and the rate of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) during follow-up. 1546 patients with a multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) and a PI-RADS ≥ 3 who underwent SB and TB between January 2012 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. 222 men with a PI-RADS ≥ 4 and a negative biopsy were included until 2019. For 177/222 (80%) complete follow-up data was obtained. 66/84 (78%) had an initial PI-RADS 4 and 18 (22%) a PI-RADS 5 lesion. 48% (84/177) received a repeat mpMRI; in the follow-up mpMRI, 39/84 (46%) lesions were downgraded to PI-RADS 2 and 11 (13%) to PI-RADS 3; three cases were upgraded and 28 lesions remained consistent. 18% (32/177) men underwent repeated TB and csPCa was detected in 44% (14/32). Our study presents real world data on the management of men with a negative TB biopsy. Men with a positive mpMRI and lesions with high suspicion (PI-RADS4/5) and a negative targeted biopsy should be critically reviewed and considered for repeat biopsy or strict surveillance. The optimal clinical risk assessment remains to be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kira Kornienko
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miriam Reuter
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Maxeiner
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karsten Günzel
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beatrice Kittner
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maximilian Reimann
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian L Hofbauer
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura E Wiemer
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robin Heckmann
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrick Asbach
- Clinic for Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martin Schostak
- Department of Urology, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Friedersdorff
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hannes Cash
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hardenbergstr.8, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Urology, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
- PROURO, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhao Y, Simpson BS, Morka N, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Kelly D, Whitaker HC, Emberton M, Norris JM. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron-Emission Tomography Imaging in Primary Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143497. [PMID: 35884558 PMCID: PMC9323375 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) has proven utility in diagnosing primary prostate cancer. However, the diagnostic potential of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA PET) has yet to be established. This study aims to systematically review the current literature comparing the diagnostic performance of mpMRI and PSMA PET imaging to diagnose primary prostate cancer. A systematic literature search was performed up to December 2021. Quality analyses were conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. The reference standard was whole-mount prostatectomy or prostate biopsy. Statistical analysis involved the pooling of the reported diagnostic performances of each modality, and differences in per-patient and per-lesion analysis were compared using a Fisher’s exact test. Ten articles were included in the meta-analysis. At a per-patient level, the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83−0.91) vs. 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90−0.96, p < 0.01); 0.47 (95% CI: 0.23−0.71) vs. 0.54 (95% CI: 0.23−0.84, p > 0.05); and 0.84 vs. 0.91, respectively. At a per-lesion level, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value for mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT were lower, at 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52−0.74) vs. 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62−0.92, p < 0.001); 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81−0.95) vs. 0.71 (95% CI: 0.47−0.90, p < 0.05); and 0.83 vs. 0.84, respectively. High heterogeneity was observed between studies. PSMA PET/CT may better confirm the presence of prostate cancer than mpMRI. However, both modalities appear comparable in determining the localisation of the lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhao
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Naomi Morka
- UCL Medical School, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK;
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK;
| | - Hayley C. Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (H.C.W.); (M.E.); (J.M.N.)
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (H.C.W.); (M.E.); (J.M.N.)
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Joseph M. Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (H.C.W.); (M.E.); (J.M.N.)
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Furrer MA, Hong A, Wetherell D, Heinze SB, Simkin P, Chow K, Lawrentschuk N, Zargar H. Evaluating the diagnostic role of in-bore magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy: a single-centre study. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:1486-1491. [PMID: 35482421 PMCID: PMC9324140 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background To evaluate the role of in‐bore MRI‐guided biopsy (IB‐MRGB) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods In this tertiary single centre study, a total of 125 consecutive patients receiving IB‐MRGB over a three‐year period were evaluated, including 73 patients who had prior biopsies and 52 biopsy‐naïve patients. We assessed cancer detection rate of patients according to the degree of suspicion based on mpMRI findings. Histopathological data were reviewed by experienced uropathologists. Results The mpMRI was suspicious for PCa (PI‐RADS 4/5) in 77% (96/125) and equivocal (PI‐RADS 3) in 23% (29/125). The detection rate for csPCa was 54.2% (52/96) and 20.7% (6/29) for suspicious lesions (PI‐RADS 4/5) and equivocal lesions (PI‐RADS 3), respectively. In subgroup analysis, patients with previous negative biopsy, overall positive biopsy rate and csPCa detection rate were 48.3% (19/35) and 34.5% (13/35), respectively. In patients on AS, 36/44 (81.8%) and 21/44 (47.8%) had PCa and csPCa respectively. In biopsy‐naïve patients 34/52 (65.4%) and 27/52 (51.92%) had PCa and csPCa respectively. Of the patients on AS, 18/44 (41.6%) upgraded from ISUP 1 to ISUP 2 PCa, and 4/44 (9.1%) upgraded from ISUP 1 to ISUP 3 PCa on IB‐MRGB. A total of 14 Clavien‐Dindo≤2 complications occurred in 14 patients (11.2%) that were directly related to the biopsy. No Clavien‐Dindo≥3 complications occurred. Conclusion MRI‐targeted biopsy is suitable for assessment of csPCa. Given the favourable complications profile, its use may be considered in both the initial biopsy and re‐biopsy settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Furrer
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anne Hong
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Wetherell
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefan B Heinze
- Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Simkin
- Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ken Chow
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pang C, Wang M, Hou HM, Liu JY, Zhang ZP, Wang X, Zhang YQ, Li CM, Zhang W, Wang JY, Liu M. Cognitive magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted biopsy combined with randomized biopsy in detection of prostate cancer. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:11183-11192. [PMID: 35071549 PMCID: PMC8717504 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers among men. Various strategies for targeted biopsy based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) have emerged, which may improve the accuracy of detecting clinically significant PCa in recent years.
AIM To investigate the diagnostic efficiency of a template for cognitive MRI-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted plus randomized biopsy in detecting PCa.
METHODS Data from patients with an increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level but less than 20 ng/mL and at least one lesion suspicious for PCa on MRI from December 2015 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent cognitive fusion transperineal template-guided targeted biopsy followed by randomized biopsy outside the targeted area. A total of 127 patients with complete data were included in the final analysis. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted, and a two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS PCa was detected in 66 of 127 patients, and 56 cases presented clinically significant PCa. Cognitive fusion targeted biopsy alone detected 59/127 cases of PCa, specifically 52/59 cases with clinically significant PCa and 7/59 cases with clinically insignificant PCa. A randomized biopsy detected seven cases of PCa negative on targeted biopsy, and four cases had clinically significant PCa. PSA density (OR: 1.008, 95%CI: 1.003-1.012, P = 0.001; OR: 1.006, 95%CI: 1.002-1.010, P = 0.004) and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores (both P < 0.001) were independently associated with the results of cognitive fusion targeted biopsy combined with randomized biopsy and targeted biopsy alone.
CONCLUSION This single-centered study proposed a feasible template for cognitive MRI-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted plus randomized biopsy. Patients with higher PSAD and PI-RADS scores were more likely to be diagnosed with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Pang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Miao Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Hui-Min Hou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jian-Yong Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhi-Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xuan Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ya-Qun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Chun-Mei Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Ye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhao Y, Morka N, Simpson BSS, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Kelly D, Whitaker HC, Emberton M, Norris JM. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography compared to multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052277. [PMID: 34893484 PMCID: PMC8666885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The introduction of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has improved almost every aspect of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. However, the novel imaging technique, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) may have demonstrable accuracy in detecting and staging prostate cancer. Here, we describe a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mpMRI to PSMA PET for the diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed for screening, data extraction, statistical analysis and reporting. Included papers will be full-text articles providing original data, written in English articles and comparing the use of PSMA PET with mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. All studies published between July 1977 and March 2021 will be eligible for inclusion. Study bias and quality will be assessed using Quadas-2 score. To ensure the quality of the reporting of studies, this protocol is written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval will not be required for this systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at both national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021239296.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhao
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Naomi Morka
- University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | | | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Setia S, Jackson J, Cendo D, Gorin MA, Allaway M, Vourganti S. Assessing the diagnostic performance of systematic freehand PrecisionPoint transperineal prostate biopsy: Comparison of observed outcomes to PBCG nomogram predictions. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:4.e9-4.e17. [PMID: 34688533 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed the diagnostic performance of freehand systematic transperineal biopsy (fTPb) by using the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) nomogram, which is a contemporary update to the PCPT nomogram. METHODS From 1/2012 to 12/2018, fTPb was performed on consecutive men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Patients included in this study had no previous diagnosis of prostate cancer, PSA between 2.5 ng/ml and 20 ng/ml, and underwent at least 12 core biopsies. In addition, those men who underwent pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate were considered separately from those without prebiopsy imaging. Biopsies were performed by a single urologist who developed the needle guidance device used in the procedure. Clinical and pathological data were collected retrospectively. We compared observed biopsy outcomes with those predicted by PBCG nomogram utilizing chi-square statistical analysis. RESULTS Systematic fTPb (without pre-biopsy MRI) was performed in 301 men (median age 67, mean PSA 6.9 ng/mL). These men had a median of 20 biopsy cores. Clinically significant cancer (ISUP 2 or greater) was found in 33.9% of men. In men without pre-biopsy MRI, using PBCG Nomogram, we found no significant difference between the expected and observed number of clinically significant cancer (96 vs. 102; P = 0.09). An additional 73 men (median age 67, mean PSA 7.8 ng/ml) underwent pre-biopsy MRI imaging. The addition of MRI targets to systematic sampling resulted in a median of 25 cores. Clinically significant cancer was found in 49.3%. Using the PBCG Nomogram, in the men with pre-biopsy MRI we found clinically significant cancer in significantly more men than was expected by PBCG nomogram predictions (36 vs. 20; P = <0.01). There were no biopsy-related infectious complications. CONCLUSION The fTPb technique is a promising method to sample the prostate which provides cancer detection that is comparable to that expected from systematic TRUS biopsy. We found that pre-biopsy mpMRI resulted in greater than expected detection of clinically significant cancer when utilizing this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaan Setia
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jamaal Jackson
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Michael A Gorin
- Urology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland, Cumberland, MD, USA; Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Matthew Allaway
- Urology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland, Cumberland, MD, USA
| | - Srinivas Vourganti
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schlemmer HP, Krause BJ, Schütz V, Bonekamp D, Schwarzenböck S, Hohenfellner M. Imaging of Prostate Cancer. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:713-719. [PMID: 34427180 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common type of solid tumor in men and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in males in Germany. The conventional strategy for its primary detection, i.e., systematic ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in men who have elevated PSA levels and/or positive findings on digital rectal examination, fails to reveal all cases. The same is true of the use of conventional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and skeletal scintigraphy for the early detection of recurrences and distant metastases. METHODS This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search, including the German clinical practice guideline on prostate cancer and systematic review articles. RESULTS Prospective multicenter trials have shown that the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer is markedly improved with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MR/TRUS fusion biopsy (TRUS = transrectal ultrasonography), compared to conventional systematic biopsy. A recent Cochrane review showed that the rate of overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer was reduced with mpMRI and MR/TRUS fusion biopsy compared with conventional systematic biopsy (95/1000 vs. 139/1000), and that clinically significant prostate cancer was more reliably detected (sensitivity 72% vs. 63%), albeit with slightly lower specificity (96% vs. 100%). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) hybrid imaging improves the detection of lymphogenic and bony metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. PSMA hybrid imaging is most commonly used to detect biochemical recurrences. A meta-analysis showed that the detection rate depends on the PSA concentration: 74.1% overall, 33.7% with PSA <0.2 ng/mL, and 91.7% with PSA ≥ 2.0 ng/mL. CONCLUSION The appropriate use of mpMRI and MR/TRUS fusion biopsy improves the initial detection of prostate cancer as well as the assessment of the prognosis. PSMA hybrid imaging is useful for the staging of high-risk patients and for the detection of recurrences. These methods are now recommended in the German clinical practice guideline on prostate cancer as well as in guidelines from other countries.
Collapse
|
17
|
Cheng LJ, Soon SS, Tan TW, Tan CH, Lim TSK, Tay KJ, Loke WT, Ang B, Chiong E, Ng K. Cost-effectiveness of MRI targeted biopsy strategies for diagnosing prostate cancer in Singapore. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:909. [PMID: 34479565 PMCID: PMC8414680 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06916-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of six diagnostic strategies involving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy for diagnosing prostate cancer in initial and repeat biopsy settings from the Singapore healthcare system perspective. METHODS A combined decision tree and Markov model was developed. The starting model population was men with mean age of 65 years referred for a first prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. The six diagnostic strategies were selected for their relevance to local clinical practice. They comprised MRI targeted biopsy following a positive pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) [Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥ 3], systematic biopsy, or saturation biopsy employed in different testing combinations and sequences. Deterministic base case analyses with sensitivity analyses were performed using costs from the healthcare system perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained as the outcome measure to yield incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS Deterministic base case analyses showed that Strategy 1 (MRI targeted biopsy alone), Strategy 2 (MRI targeted biopsy ➔ systematic biopsy), and Strategy 4 (MRI targeted biopsy ➔ systematic biopsy ➔ saturation biopsy) were cost-effective options at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$20,000, with ICERs ranging from US$18,975 to US$19,458. Strategies involving MRI targeted biopsy in the repeat biopsy setting were dominated. Sensitivity analyses found the ICERs were affected mostly by changes to the annual discounting rate and prevalence of prostate cancer in men referred for first biopsy, ranging between US$15,755 to US$23,022. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed Strategy 1 to be the least costly, and Strategies 2 and 4 being the preferred strategies when WTP thresholds were US$20,000 and US$30,000, respectively. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS This study found MRI targeted biopsy to be cost-effective in diagnosing prostate cancer in the biopsy-naïve setting in Singapore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Jen Cheng
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, 16 College Road, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Swee Sung Soon
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, 16 College Road, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Teck Wei Tan
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cher Heng Tan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Tim Loke
- Urology Service, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bertrand Ang
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Edmund Chiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kwong Ng
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, 16 College Road, Singapore, 169854, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patient- and tumor-level risk factors for MRI-invisible prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:794-801. [PMID: 33568751 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00330-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiparametric MRI is highly sensitive for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, but has a 10-20% false negative rate. It is unknown if there are clinical factors that predict MRI invisibility. We sought to identify predictors of MRI-invisible (MRI(-)) disease. METHODS Men undergoing MRI/US-fusion targeted + systematic biopsy by two surgeons at our institution from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical data, MRI metrics, and biopsy pathology results were obtained by chart review. An MRI(-) tumor was defined as a positive systematic biopsy in a zone without an MRI lesion. Factors associated with presence of MRI(-) tumors were identified using stepwise multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Of 194 men included in the analysis, 79 (41%) and 25 (13%) men had GG1+ and GG2+ MRI(-) tumors, respectively. On multivariable analysis, only Black race was associated with presence of GG1+ MRI(-) tumors (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.02-4.96). Black race (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.24-9.87) and higher PSA density (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.34-3.20) were associated with presence of GG2+ MRI(-) tumors. In non-Black and Black men, detection of MRI(-) tumors on systematic biopsy upgraded patients from no disease to GG2+ disease 1% and 11% of the time, respectively, and from GG1 to GG2+ disease 42% and 60% of the time, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Black race and PSA density were associated with presence of MRI(-) prostate cancer. Further study on racial differences is warranted based on these results. Surgeons should consider pre-biopsy risk factors before deciding to omit systematic prostate biopsy regardless of mpMRI results.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu CL, Kim M, Wu S, Lin SX, Crotty RK, Harisinghani M, Feldman AS, Dahl DM. Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection. Hum Pathol 2021; 117:101-107. [PMID: 34461132 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Perineural invasion (PNI) on biopsy is associated with adverse features in prostate cancer (PCa). Transrectal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) has shown to detect higher presence of PNI than standard template biopsy (SBx). Transperineal biopsy provides effective cancer detection with lower complications than the transrectal approach. We compared PNI detection efficiency between SBx and TBx through transperineal approach. We identified patients with PCa who underwent transperineal TBx and concomitant standard 20-core template SBx from September 2019 to February 2021. Clinical, MRI imaging and biopsy characteristics were evaluated and compared between TBx and SBx. Two hundred thirty-eight patients with PCa underwent concomitant transperineal SBx and TBx procedures. Combined PNI+ (SBxPNI+ and/or TBxPNI+) was identified in 77 of 238 (32.4%) patients. SBx detected 23.9% PNI-positive patients and TBx detected 19.3% PNI-positive patients of all patients with PCa. Patients with PNI were with significantly different clinicopathological characteristics than patients without PNI. Although significantly more positive PCa cores and higher positive PCa core rate were found in the SBx method, patients with SBxPNI+ only shared similar features as TBxPNI+only patients. Of 176 cases with both SBxPCa and TBxPCa, TBx could detect 19 (15.1%) more PNI cases than SBx while SBx could detect 24 (18.3%) more PNI cases than TBx. Multiparametric MRI fusion-targeted biopsy in combination with template biopsy through transperineal approach achieved PNI detection rate over 30% of PCa cases. The increased PNI detection may improve the model to select active surveillance candidates in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Michelle Kim
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Shulin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Sharron X Lin
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Rory K Crotty
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Douglas M Dahl
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Regmi SK, Sathianathen N, Stout TE, Konety BR. MRI/PET Imaging in elevated PSA and localized prostate cancer: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:3117-3129. [PMID: 34430415 PMCID: PMC8350235 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To review the recent milestones in MRI and PET based imaging and evaluate their evolving role in the setting of elevated PSA as well as localized prostate cancer. Background The importance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PET based imaging for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer cannot be understated. Accurate staging has become another significant milestone with the use of PET scans, particularly with prostate specific radiotracers like 68-Gallium Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Integrated PET/MRI systems are commercially available and can be modulated to evaluate the unique needs of localized as well as recurrent prostate cancer. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar using the MeSH compliant and other keywords that included prostate cancer, PSA, mpMRI, PET CT, PET/MRI. Conclusions mpMRI has now established itself as the gold-standard of local prostate imaging and has been incorporated into international guidelines as part of the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT has shown superiority over conventional imaging even in staging of localized prostate cancer based on recent randomized control data. Imaging parameters from PET/MRI have been shown to be associated with malignancy, Gleason score and tumour volume. As mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT become more ubiquitous and established; we can anticipate more high-quality data, cost optimization and increasing availability of PET/MRI to be ready for primetime in localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subodh K Regmi
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Thomas E Stout
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy Techniques: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:1263-1281. [PMID: 34259038 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in men worldwide. Systematic transrectal prostate biopsy is commonly used to obtain tissue to establish the diagnosis. However, in recent years, MRI-targeted biopsy (based on an MRI examination performed prior to consideration of biopsy) has been shown to detect more clinically significant cancer and less clinically insignificant cancer compared to systematic biopsy. This approach of performing MRI prior to biopsy has become, or is becoming, a standard of practice in centers throughout the world. This growing use of an MRI-directed pathway is leading to performance of a larger volume of MRI-targeted prostate biopsies. The three common MRI-targeted biopsy techniques are cognitive biopsy, MRI-ultrasound software fusion biopsy, and MRI in-bore guided biopsy. These techniques for using MRI information at the time of biopsy can be performed via a transrectal or transperineal approach. This narrative review presents the three MRI-targeted biopsy techniques along with their advantages and shortcomings. Comparisons among the techniques are summarized based on the available evidence. Studies to date have provided heterogeneous results, and the preferred technique remains debated.
Collapse
|
22
|
Cata ED, Andras I, Telecan T, Tamas-Szora A, Coman RT, Stanca DV, Coman I, Crisan N. MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward! Med Pharm Rep 2021; 94:145-157. [PMID: 34013185 PMCID: PMC8118209 DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim For decades, the gold standard technique for diagnosing prostate cancer was the 10 to 12 core systematic transrectal or transperineal biopsy, under ultrasound guidance. Over the past years, an increased rate of false negative results and detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer has been noted, resulting into overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the changes in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer brought by MRI-targeted prostate biopsy. Methods A critical review of literature was carried out using the Medline database through a PubMed search, 37 studies meeting the inclusion criteria: prospective studies published in the past 8 years with at least 100 patients per study, which used multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as guidance for targeted biopsies. Results In-Bore MRI targeted biopsy and Fusion targeted biopsy outperform standard systematic biopsy both in terms of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer detection, and ensure a lower detection rate of insignificant prostate cancer, with fewer cores needed. In-Bore MRI targeted biopsy performs better than Fusion biopsy especially in cases of apical lesions. Conclusion Targeted biopsy is an emerging and developing technique which offers the needed improvements in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer and lowers the incidence of insignificant ones, providing a more accurate selection of the patients for active surveillance and focal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel Darius Cata
- Urology Department, Clinical Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Iulia Andras
- Urology Department, Clinical Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Teodora Telecan
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Radu-Tudor Coman
- Epidemiology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Dan-Vasile Stanca
- Urology Department, Clinical Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ioan Coman
- Urology Department, Clinical Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nicolae Crisan
- Urology Department, Clinical Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Limitations of overlapping cores in systematic and MRI-US fusion biopsy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:782.e15-782.e21. [PMID: 33888423 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinically-significant prostate cancer (csCaP) detection rate of systematic (SBx) vs. targeted biopsy (TBx), after accounting for the overlapping systematic cores within the MRI regions of interest. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 398 consecutive men who underwent both transperineal systematic and targeted biopsy between January 2015 to January 2019. We reclassified overlapping systematic cores in the MRI regions of interest as target cores. The detection rates of SBx and TBx were compared using McNemar's test. RESULTS Detection rate of csCaP (grade group ≥2) was 42% (168/398). Median number of systematic and targeted cores were 23 (IQR 19-29) and 9 (IQR 6-12) respectively. A median of 3 (IQR 2-4) overlapping systematic cores were reclassified as targeted cores. After accounting for overlap, csPC detection rate on SBx decreased from 37% and 21% while the csCaP detection rate of TBx increased from 34% to 39% (both P < 0.001), with TBx having a better detection rate (39% vs. 21%, P < 0.001). A previous negative biopsy was associated with a lower risk of having csCaP on non-targeted SBx (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.58, P = 0.001). Only 5% (13/243) of those who had no cancer detected on TBx had csCaP on non-targeted SBx compared to 45% (70/155) of those who had csCaP on TBx (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The utility of SBx in detecting csCaP decreases after accounting for overlap into the MRI region of interest, especially in men with a prior negative biopsy. Overlapping systematic cores improve the csCaP detection rate on TBx.
Collapse
|
24
|
Günzel K, Magheli A, Baco E, Cash H, Heinrich S, Neubert H, Schlegel J, Schostak M, Henkel T, Asbach P, Hinz S. Infection rate and complications after 621 transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies in local anesthesia without standard antibiotic prophylaxis. World J Urol 2021; 39:3861-3866. [PMID: 33866401 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03699-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the post biopsy infection rate, feasibility and prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate (CDR) by performing transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate (TPBx) under local anesthesia (LA) without antibiotic prophylaxis (AP). METHODS We prospectively screened 766 men with suspicious lesions on mpMRI, an elevated PSA level or a suspect digital examination undergoing MRI-TRUS-TPBx in LA, from May 2019 to July 2020. Patients with the need for antibiotic prophylaxis or without a PI-RADS target lesion were excluded from final analyses. We reported CDR, perioperative pain (0-10) and postoperative complications. PCa with an ISUP grade ≥ 2 was classified as clinically significant PCa (csPCa). RESULTS We included 621 patients with a median age of 68 years (IQR 62-74), a PSA of 6.43 ng/mL (IQR 4.72-9.91) and a prostate volume of 45 cc (IQR 32-64). In median, 4 targeted (TB) (IQR 3-4) and 6 (IQR 5-7) systematic biopsies (SB) detected in combination overall 416 (67%) PCa and 324 (52%) csPCa. Overall CDR of TB for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 was 26%, 65% and 84%, respectively. Patients reported a median perioperative pain level of 2 (IQR 1-3). Four patients (0.6%) developed a post biopsy infection, one experienced urosepsis. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy under LA without AP is feasible, safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Günzel
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany.
| | - A Magheli
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Baco
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Cash
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S Heinrich
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| | - H Neubert
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Schlegel
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Schostak
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - T Henkel
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Asbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Hinz
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Berlin, Dieffenbachstraße 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Use of the MyProstateScore Test to Rule Out Clinically Significant Cancer: Validation of a Straightforward Clinical Testing Approach. J Urol 2021; 205:732-739. [PMID: 33080150 PMCID: PMC8189629 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The MyProstateScore test was validated for improved detection of clinically significant (grade group ≥2) prostate cancer relative to prostate specific antigen based risk calculators. We sought to validate an optimal MyProstateScore threshold for clinical use in ruling out grade group ≥2 cancer in men referred for biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Biopsy naïve men provided post-digital rectal examination urine prior to biopsy. MyProstateScore was calculated using the validated, locked multivariable model including only serum prostate specific antigen, urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and urinary TMPRSS2:ERG. The MyProstateScore threshold approximating 95% sensitivity for grade group ≥2 cancer was identified in a training cohort, and performance was measured in 2 external validation cohorts. We assessed the 1) overall biopsy referral population and 2) population meeting guideline based testing criteria (ie, prostate specific antigen 3-10, or <3 with suspicious digital rectal examination). RESULTS Validation cohorts were prospectively enrolled from academic (977 patients, median prostate specific antigen 4.5, IQR 3.1-6.0) and community (548, median prostate specific antigen 4.9, IQR 3.7-6.8) settings. In the overall validation population (1,525 patients), 338 men (22%) had grade group ≥2 cancer on biopsy. The MyProstateScore threshold of 10 provided 97% sensitivity and 98% negative predictive value for grade group ≥2 cancer. MyProstateScore testing would have prevented 387 unnecessary biopsies (33%), while missing only 10 grade group ≥2 cancers (3.0%). In 1,242 patients meeting guideline based criteria, MyProstateScore ≤10 provided 96% sensitivity and 97% negative predictive value, and would have prevented 32% of unnecessary biopsies, missing 3.7% of grade group ≥2 cancers. CONCLUSIONS In a large, clinically pertinent biopsy referral population, MyProstateScore ≤10 provided exceptional sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out grade group ≥2 cancer. This straightforward secondary testing approach would reduce the use of more costly and invasive procedures after screening with prostate specific antigen.
Collapse
|
26
|
Seetharam Bhat KR, Samavedi S, Moschovas MC, Onol FF, Roof S, Rogers T, Patel VR, Sivaraman A. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy-A review of literature. Asian J Urol 2021; 8:105-116. [PMID: 33569277 PMCID: PMC7859420 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. Materials and methods A literature search was performed for "multiparametric MRI", "MRI fusion biopsy", "MRI guided biopsy", "prostate biopsy", "MRI cognitive biopsy", "MRI fusion biopsy systems", "prostate biopsy" and "cost analysis". The search operation was performed using the operator "OR" and "AND" with the above key words. All relevant systematic reviews, original articles, case series, and case reports were selected for this review. Results The sensitivity of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is between 91%-93%, and the specificity is between 36%-41% in various studies. It also has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%-92% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51%-52%. The yield of MRI fusion biopsy (MRI-FB) is similar, if not superior to MR cognitive biopsy. In-bore MRI-TB had better detection rates compared to MR cognitive biopsy, but were similar to MR fusion biopsy. Conclusions The use of MRI guidance in prostate biopsy is inevitable, subject to availability, cost, and experience. Any one of the three modalities (i.e. MRI cognitive, MRI fusion and MRI in-bore approach) can be used. MRI-FB has a fine balance with regards to accuracy, practicality and affordability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srinivas Samavedi
- The Hays Medical Centre, University of Kansas Health System, Hays, KS, USA
| | - Marcio Covas Moschovas
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | - Fikret Fatih Onol
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | - Shannon Roof
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | - Travis Rogers
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | - Vipul R Patel
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang X, Hielscher T, Radtke JP, Görtz M, Schütz V, Kuder TA, Gnirs R, Schwab C, Stenzinger A, Hohenfellner M, Schlemmer HP, Bonekamp D. Comparison of single-scanner single-protocol quantitative ADC measurements to ADC ratios to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2021; 136:109538. [PMID: 33482592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mean ADC has high predictive value for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC). Measurement variability is introduced by different scanners, protocols, intra-and inter-patient variation. Internal calibration by ADC ratios can address such fluctuations however can potentially lower the biological value of quantitative ADC determination by being sensitive to deviations in reference tissue signal. PURPOSE To better understand the predictive value of quantitative ADC measurements in comparison to internal reference ratios when measured in a single scanner, single protocol setup. MATERIALS AND METHODS 284 consecutive patients who underwent 3 T MRI on a single scanner followed by MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy were included. A board-certified radiologist retrospectively reviewed all MRIs blinded to clinical information and placed regions of interest (ROI) on all focal lesions and the following reference regions: normal-appearing peripheral zone (PZNL) and transition zone (TZNL), the urinary bladder (BLA), and right and left internal obturator muscle (RIOM, LIOM). ROI-based mean ADC and ADC ratios to the reference regions were compared regarding their ability to predict the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between ADC parameters, Gleason score (GS) and ADC ratios. The primary endpoint was presence of sPC, defined as a GS ≥ 3 + 4. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to predict sPC. Receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were used for visualization; DeLong test was used to evaluate the differences of the area under the curve (AUC). Bias-corrected AUC values and corresponding 95 %-CI were calculated using bootstrapping with 100 bootstrap samples. RESULTS After exclusion of patients who received prior treatment, 259 patients were included in the final cohort of which 220 harbored 351 MR lesions. Mean ADC and ADC ratios demonstrated a negative correlation with the GS. Mean ADC had the strongest correlation with ρ of -0.34, followed by ADCratioPZNL (ρ=-0.32). All ADC parameters except ADCratioLIOM (p = 0.07) were associated with sPC p<0.05). Mean ADC and ADCratioPZNL had the highest ROC AUC of all parameters (0.68). Multivariable models with mean ADC improve predictive performance. CONCLUSIONS A highly standardized single-scanner mean ADC measurement could not be improved upon using any of the single ADC ratio parameters or combinations of these parameters in predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianfeng Wang
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guangxi, Guilin, PR China
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Görtz
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Viktoria Schütz
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Anselm Kuder
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Regula Gnirs
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Schwab
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vėželis A, Platkevičius G, Kinčius M, Gumbys L, Naruševičiūtė I, Briedienė R, Petroška D, Ulys A, Jankevičius F. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57010057. [PMID: 33435132 PMCID: PMC7827632 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and the need for repeated procedures caused by transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies and their related complications places a heavy burden on healthcare systems. This was a prospective cohort validating study to access the clinical accuracy of systematic and MRI-cognitive targeted transperineal prostate biopsies in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer after a previous negative biopsy and persistent suspicion of malignancy. The primary goal was to assess the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect clinically significant prostate cancer with an additional goal to assess the diagnostic value of systematic and MRI-cognitive transperineal biopsies. Materials and Methods: In total, 200 patients were enrolled who had rising serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels for at least 4 months after a previous negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy. All eligible men underwent 1.5T prostate mpMRI, reported using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2), followed by a 20-region transperineal prostate systematic biopsy and additional targeted biopsies. Results: Systematic 20-core transperineal prostate biopsies (TPBs) were performed for 38 (19%) patients. Systemic 20-core TPB with additional cognitive targeted biopsies were performed for 162 (81%) patients. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) was detected for 31 (15.5%) patients, of which 20 (64.5%) cases of csPC were detected by systematic biopsy, eight (25.8%) cases were detected by targeted biopsy, and three (9.7%) both by systematic and targeted biopsies. Conclusions: Cognitive mpMRI guided transperineal target biopsies increase the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer after a previously negative biopsy. However, in a repeat prostate biopsy setting, we recommend applying a cognitive targeted biopsy with the addition of a systematic biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvydas Vėželis
- Department of Oncourology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania; (A.V.); (M.K.); (A.U.)
| | - Gediminas Platkevičius
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania;
- Correspondence:
| | - Marius Kinčius
- Department of Oncourology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania; (A.V.); (M.K.); (A.U.)
| | - Liutauras Gumbys
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Physics of Medicine, Center for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| | - Ieva Naruševičiūtė
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, 08660 Vilnius, Lithuania; (I.N.); (R.B.)
| | - Rūta Briedienė
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Institute, 08660 Vilnius, Lithuania; (I.N.); (R.B.)
| | - Donatas Petroška
- National Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| | - Albertas Ulys
- Department of Oncourology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania; (A.V.); (M.K.); (A.U.)
| | - Feliksas Jankevičius
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhat Z, Bhat A, Mahmalji W. Consecutive transperineal prostatic template biopsies employing cognitive and systematic approach: a single center study. Aging Male 2020; 23:953-957. [PMID: 31318579 DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2019.1641796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of transperineal template biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis is well established. Pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used in most centers for planning of prostate biopsies and staging. Cognitive and software fusion techniques are increasingly getting popular. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent transperineal template biopsies from January 2016 till December 2018. This included patients on active surveillance, previous negative transrectal ultrasonography biopsies with persistently raised prostate-specific antigen/abnormal prostate on digital rectal examination and de-novo template biopsies. Two specialist uro-radiologists reported all the scans and the biopsies were performed by one experienced urologist. The cognitive biopsies were performed for PIRADS 3-5 lesions on MRI. Total of 330 patients underwent transperineal template biopsies and cognitive target biopsies were carried out in 75 patients who were included in the study. We evaluated the results as positive/negative cognitive biopsies and also according to the PIRAD scoring. Only the patients with prostate cancer on template biopsy histology were included. RESULTS Fifty-seven (76%) of the cognitive biopsies were positive out of total 75.[Table: see text]. CONCLUSIONS Combined cognitive and systematic biopsies have excellent diagnostic rate especially for PIRAD 4-5 MRI areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubair Bhat
- Department of Urology, Medway Maritime Hospital Hospital, Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom
| | - Arshad Bhat
- Department of Urology, Medway Maritime Hospital Hospital, Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom
| | - Wasim Mahmalji
- Department of Urology, Hereford County Hospital, Hereford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Thomson A, Li M, Grummet J, Sengupta S. Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:3009-3017. [PMID: 33457274 PMCID: PMC7807331 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is most offered worldwide. Transperineal biopsy (TPP-biopsy), on the other hand, has been gaining popularity due to its superior sensitivity and lower rate of sepsis. This article offers a review of the brachytherapy grid technique used to perform a TPP-biopsy, as well as a discussion of possible variations in the procedure. TPP-biopsy is typically performed under general anaesthesia with patient in lithotomy. Through the perineum, cores of tissue are taken systematically, with or without targeting, under US guidance. Different fusion techniques (cognition, MRI-US fusion software, MRI in-bore) can be used to target pre-identified lesions on MRI. The sampling can be done either by free hand or using a brachytherapy grid. Robotic assisted prostate biopsy is also available on the market as an alternative. In recent years, there has been accumulating evidence showing that it is safe and feasible to perform TPPB under local anaesthesia. This may improve the uptake of TPPB as the preferred biopsy technique for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Thomson
- Urology Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mo Li
- Urology Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.,Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Urology Department, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- Urology Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.,Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nonsuspicious prebiopsy multiparametric MRI: is prostate biopsy still necessary? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:4160-4165. [PMID: 32902661 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02728-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), alone or combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen density (PSAd) to exclude clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of all the patients who had transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB) in our center between January 2014 and March 2019. We included patients who had nonsuspicious prebiopsy mpMRI defined as Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≤ 2. MRI was performed using a 1.5 or 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance scanners with external phased-array coil. The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa, defined as a Gleason score 3 + 4 (ISUP 2) or higher on at least one biopsy core. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-one consecutive men (median age: 65 years, median PSA level: 9.3 ng/mL) underwent TRUSGB following negative prebiopsy mpMRI corresponding to 126 (66%) biopsy-naïve patients, 36 (18.8%) patients with prior negative biopsy, and 29 (15.2%) patients under active surveillance with confirmatory biopsies. The overall PCa and csPCA detection rates were 26.7% and 5.2%, conferring a NPV of 73.3% and 94.8%, respectively. The NPV of negative mpMRI improved to 95.8% in patients with PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL/cm3 and to 100% in patients with PSAd < 0.10 ng/mL/cm3. CONCLUSIONS A negative prebiopsy mpMRI had an overall NPV of 94.8% for csPCa when mpMRI was used alone to 95.8% when combined with PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL/cm3. Future studies are needed to balance the low benefit of a biopsy in this indication with the morbidity of the procedure.
Collapse
|
32
|
Schelb P, Tavakoli AA, Tubtawee T, Hielscher T, Radtke JP, Görtz M, Schütz V, Kuder TA, Schimmöller L, Stenzinger A, Hohenfellner M, Schlemmer HP, Bonekamp D. Comparison of Prostate MRI Lesion Segmentation Agreement Between Multiple Radiologists and a Fully Automatic Deep Learning System. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2020; 193:559-573. [PMID: 33212541 DOI: 10.1055/a-1290-8070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A recently developed deep learning model (U-Net) approximated the clinical performance of radiologists in the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC) from prostate MRI. Here, we compare the agreement between lesion segmentations by U-Net with manual lesion segmentations performed by different radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS 165 patients with suspicion for sPC underwent targeted and systematic fusion biopsy following 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Five sets of segmentations were generated retrospectively: segmentations of clinical lesions, independent segmentations by three radiologists, and fully automated bi-parametric U-Net segmentations. Per-lesion agreement was calculated for each rater by averaging Dice coefficients with all overlapping lesions from other raters. Agreement was compared using descriptive statistics and linear mixed models. RESULTS The mean Dice coefficient for manual segmentations showed only moderate agreement at 0.48-0.52, reflecting the difficult visual task of determining the outline of otherwise jointly detected lesions. U-net segmentations were significantly smaller than manual segmentations (p < 0.0001) and exhibited a lower mean Dice coefficient of 0.22, which was significantly lower compared to manual segmentations (all p < 0.0001). These differences remained after correction for lesion size and were unaffected between sPC and non-sPC lesions and between peripheral and transition zone lesions. CONCLUSION Knowledge of the order of agreement of manual segmentations of different radiologists is important to set the expectation value for artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the task of prostate MRI lesion segmentation. Perfect agreement (Dice coefficient of one) should not be expected for AI. Lower Dice coefficients of U-Net compared to manual segmentations are only partially explained by smaller segmentation sizes and may result from a focus on the lesion core and a small relative lesion center shift. Although it is primarily important that AI detects sPC correctly, the Dice coefficient for overlapping lesions from multiple raters can be used as a secondary measure for segmentation quality in future studies. KEY POINTS · Intermediate human Dice coefficients reflect the difficulty of outlining jointly detected lesions.. · Lower Dice coefficients of deep learning motivate further research to approximate human perception.. · Comparable predictive performance of deep learning appears independent of Dice agreement.. · Dice agreement independent of significant cancer presence indicates indistinguishability of some benign imaging findings.. · Improving DWI to T2 registration may improve the observed U-Net Dice coefficients.. CITATION FORMAT · Schelb P, Tavakoli AA, Tubtawee T et al. Comparison of Prostate MRI Lesion Segmentation Agreement Between Multiple Radiologists and a Fully Automatic Deep Learning System. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 559 - 573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Schelb
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Teeravut Tubtawee
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan-Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Görtz
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Viktoria Schütz
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Anselm Kuder
- Division of Medical Physics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Schimmöller
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - David Bonekamp
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Norris JM, Carmona Echeverria LM, Simpson BS, Ball R, Freeman A, Kelly D, Kirkham A, Whitaker HC, Emberton M. Histopathological features of prostate cancer conspicuity on multiparametric MRI: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039735. [PMID: 33093035 PMCID: PMC7583062 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has improved risk stratification for men with suspected prostate cancer. Indeed, mpMRI-visible tumours tend to be larger and of higher pathological grade than mpMRI-invisible tumours; however, concern remains around significant cancer that is undetected by mpMRI. There has been considerable recent interest to investigate whether tumour conspicuity on mpMRI is associated with additional histopathological features (including cellular density, microvessel density and unusual prostate cancer subtypes), which may have important clinical implications in both diagnosis and prognosis. Furthermore, analysis of these features may help reveal the radiobiology that underpins the actual mechanisms of mpMRI visibility (and invisibility) of prostate tumours. Here, we describe a protocol for a systematic review of the histopathological basis of prostate cancer conspicuity on mpMRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines will be used to guide screening, thematic reporting and conclusions drawn from all eligible studies. Included papers will be full-text, English-language articles, comparing the histopathological characteristics of mpMRI-visible lesions and mpMRI-invisible tumours. All studies published between January 1950 and January 2020 will be eligible for inclusion. Studies using confirmatory immunohistochemistry for the identification of immune subsets or structural components will be included. Study bias and quality will be assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. To ensure methodological rigour, this protocol is written in accordance with the PRISMA Protocol 2015 checklist. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be conducted comparing histopathological feature frequency between mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible disease. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethical approval will be required as this is an academic review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020176049.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Benjamin S Simpson
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rhys Ball
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Winoker JS, Wajswol E, Falagario U, Maritini A, Moshier E, Voutsinas N, Knauer CJ, Sfakianos JP, Lewis SC, Taouli BA, Rastinehad AR. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Urology 2020; 146:278-286. [PMID: 32956688 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare transperineal (TP-TBx) and transrectal (TR-TBx) targeted prostate biopsy in a prospective non randomized single surgeon series of MR/US fusion-guided targeted biopsy performed using an electromagnetic tracking platform (NCT04026763). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-institution prospective study, 168 patients who underwent transperineal systematic 12-core biopsy and TP-TBx with electromagnetic tracking (UroNav, Invivo, Gainesville, FL) were compared to 211 patients who underwent a similar procedure by a transrectal approach. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess if biopsy technique impacted all cancer detection rates or clinically significant (Gleason score >3+4) cancer detection rates. RESULTS Patients who underwent TP-TBx were older (68 vs 65 y, P = .014), with a slightly higher rate of PI-RADSv2.0 score (39% vs 28%, P = .039) and higher lesion volume on mpMRI (0.54 vs 0.41 cc, P = .039). The rates of CS disease detection by TP-TBx and TR-TBx were 59% and 54%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for PSA, previous biopsy status, prostate volume, PI-RADS score, lesion volume, and lesion location, there was no statistically significant difference in likelihood to detect any PCa (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.56-1.71; P = .940) or CS PCa (OR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.58-1.51; P = .791). CONCLUSION Transperineal targeted biopsy with electromagnetic-tracking is comparable to the transrectal fusion-guided approach in the detection of any PCa and csPCa cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared S Winoker
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ethan Wajswol
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Alberto Maritini
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Nicholas Voutsinas
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Cynthia J Knauer
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Sara C Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Bachir A Taouli
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ardeshir R Rastinehad
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee AYM, Yang XY, Lee HJ, Law YM, Huang HH, Lau WKO, Lee LS, Ho HSS, Tay KJ, Cheng CWS, Yuen JSP, Chen K. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy. BJU Int 2020; 126:568-576. [PMID: 32438463 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the detection rates of prostate cancer between systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy using a stereotactic robot-assisted transperineal prostate platform. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified consecutive patients with suspicious lesion(s) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), who underwent both systematic and MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (US) fusion targeted biopsy using our proprietary transperineal robot-assisted prostate biopsy platform between January 2015 and January 2019 at our institution, for retrospective analysis. Comparative analysis was performed between systematic and targeted biopsy using McNemar's test, and the cohort was further stratified by prior biopsy status and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.0 score. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) ≥2 cancers (previously known as Gleason grade ≥7) were considered to be clinically significant. RESULTS A total of 500 patients were included in our final analysis, of whom 67 (13%) were patients with low-risk cancer on active surveillance. Of the 433 patients without prior diagnosis of cancer, 288 (67%) were biopsy-naïve. A total of 248 (57%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer, with 199 (46%) having clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP GG ≥2). There were no statistically significant differences in the overall prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate between systematic and targeted biopsy (51% vs 49% and 40% vs 38% respectively; P = 0.306 and P = 0.609). Of the 248 prostate cancers detected, 75% (187/248) were detected on both systematic and targeted biopsy, 14% (35/248) were detected on systematic biopsy alone and 11% (26/248) were detected on targeted biopsy alone. Of the 199 clinically significant cancers detected, 69% (138/199) were detected on both systematic and targeted biopsy, 17% (33/199) on systematic biopsy alone and 14% (28/199) on targeted biopsy alone. There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rate between systematic and targeted biopsy for both overall and clinically significant prostate cancer, even when the cohort was stratified by prior biopsy status and PI-RADS score. Targeted biopsy has greater sampling efficiency compared to systematic biopsy for both overall and clinically significant prostate cancer (23.2% vs 9.8%, P < 0.001 and 14.8% vs 5.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Using our robot-assisted transperineal prostate platform, combined MRI-US targeted biopsy with concurrent systematic prostate systematic biopsy probably represents the optimal method for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin Y M Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xin Yan Yang
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Han Jie Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yan Mee Law
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hong Hong Huang
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weber K O Lau
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lui Shiong Lee
- Department of Urology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Henry S S Ho
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - John S P Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Norris JM, Simpson BS, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Whitaker HC, Emberton M. Conspicuity of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A cross-disciplinary translational hypothesis. FASEB J 2020; 34:14150-14159. [PMID: 32920937 PMCID: PMC8436756 DOI: 10.1096/fj.202001466r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has transformed the risk stratification and diagnostic approach for suspected prostate cancer. The majority of clinically significant prostate cancers are visible on pre-biopsy mpMRI, however, there are a subset of significant tumors that are not detected by mpMRI. The radiobiological mechanisms underpinning mpMRI-visibility and invisibility of these cancers remain uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that mpMRI-visible tumors are enriched with molecular features associated with increased disease aggressivity and poor clinical prognosis, which is supported by short-term endpoints, such as biochemical recurrence following surgery. Furthermore, at the histopathological level, mpMRI-visible tumors appear to exhibit increased architectural and vascular density compared to mpMRI-invisible disease. It seems probable that the genomic, pathological, radiological, and clinical features of mpMRI-visible and mpMRI-invisible prostate cancers are interrelated. Here, we propose a novel cross-disciplinary theory that links genomic and molecular evidence with cellular and histopathological appearances, elucidating both the mpMRI visibility and clinical status of significant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin S Simpson
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schelb P, Wang X, Radtke JP, Wiesenfarth M, Kickingereder P, Stenzinger A, Hohenfellner M, Schlemmer HP, Maier-Hein KH, Bonekamp D. Simulated clinical deployment of fully automatic deep learning for clinical prostate MRI assessment. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:302-313. [PMID: 32767102 PMCID: PMC7755653 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To simulate clinical deployment, evaluate performance, and establish quality assurance of a deep learning algorithm (U-Net) for detection, localization, and segmentation of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC), ISUP grade group ≥ 2, using bi-parametric MRI. Methods In 2017, 284 consecutive men in active surveillance, biopsy-naïve or pre-biopsied, received targeted and extended systematic MRI/transrectal US-fusion biopsy, after examination on a single MRI scanner (3 T). A prospective adjustment scheme was evaluated comparing the performance of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and U-Net using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the Dice coefficient. Results In the 259 eligible men (median 64 [IQR 61–72] years), PI-RADS had a sensitivity of 98% [106/108]/84% [91/108] with a specificity of 17% [25/151]/58% [88/151], for thresholds at ≥ 3/≥ 4 respectively. U-Net using dynamic threshold adjustment had a sensitivity of 99% [107/108]/83% [90/108] (p > 0.99/> 0.99) with a specificity of 24% [36/151]/55% [83/151] (p > 0.99/> 0.99) for probability thresholds d3 and d4 emulating PI-RADS ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 decisions respectively, not statistically different from PI-RADS. Co-occurrence of a radiological PI-RADS ≥ 4 examination and U-Net ≥ d3 assessment significantly improved the positive predictive value from 59 to 63% (p = 0.03), on a per-patient basis. Conclusions U-Net has similar performance to PI-RADS in simulated continued clinical use. Regular quality assurance should be implemented to ensure desired performance. Key Points • U-Net maintained similar diagnostic performance compared to radiological assessment of PI-RADS ≥ 4 when applied in a simulated clinical deployment. • Application of our proposed prospective dynamic calibration method successfully adjusted U-Net performance within acceptable limits of the PI-RADS reference over time, while not being limited to PI-RADS as a reference. • Simultaneous detection by U-Net and radiological assessment significantly improved the positive predictive value on a per-patient and per-lesion basis, while the negative predictive value remained unchanged. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07086-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Schelb
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xianfeng Wang
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guangxi, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Wiesenfarth
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Kickingereder
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus H Maier-Hein
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Loy LM, Lim GH, Leow JJ, Lee CH, Tan TW, Tan CH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:650-660. [PMID: 32505458 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Targeted biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging increases the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). In this meta-analysis, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal (TR) vs transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI-guided software fusion biopsy (FB) in the detection of csCaP. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase electronic databases up until July 2019 following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis system. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of either approach was evaluated using radical prostatectomy or systematic biopsies with ≥24 biopsy cores to be the reference standard. Fourteen papers with a total of 2002 patients were selected. Seven hundred and sixty-five patients underwent TR FB, while 1,387 underwent TP FB. One hundred and fifty of the patients underwent both TR and TP approaches. Both approaches were similar in terms of sensitivity (TR vs. TP: 0.81 vs 0.80) and specificity (TR vs. TP: 0.99 vs 0.95). In terms of likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio, TR performed better than TP approach. The area under the receiving operator curve for both approaches was similar (0.91 vs 0.88 respectively). However, there was substantial heterogeneity across the studies for both approaches. TP and TR approaches to software-based FB yield similar diagnostic performance for the detection of csCaP. When deciding on the approach, physicians should consider other inherent features of either technique that suit their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gek Hsiang Lim
- Clinical Research and Innovation Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore
| | - Chau Hung Lee
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Teck Wei Tan
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cher Heng Tan
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Noureldin ME, Connor MJ, Boxall N, Miah S, Shah T, Walz J. Current techniques of prostate biopsy: an update from past to present. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1510-1517. [PMID: 32676438 PMCID: PMC7354294 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowing the demerits of the transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy has led to a shift in the general techniques and technology of the prostate biopsy. In addition, the advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and the evidence from the PROMIS trial about its ability to detect clinically significant tumours encourage urologists and industry to implement MRI-guided targeted biopsy. However, the science is still looking how to improve safety and increase its cancer detection rate (CDR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Essam Noureldin
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Martin J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Boxall
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Saiful Miah
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Taimur Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
D'Agostino D, Casablanca C, Mineo Bianchi F, Corsi P, Romagnoli D, Giampaoli M, Fiori C, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Artibani W, Porreca A. The role of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer; comparison between FUSION and "IN-BORE" approaches. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2020; 73:90-97. [PMID: 32456413 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.03550-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study is to evaluate the difference in terms of feasibility and detection rate of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided biopsy approaches (MRI fusion versus "in-bore" MRI) in a single tertiary center. METHODS We retrospectively identified 297 patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent MRI based target prostate biopsy (FUSION or "in-bore" approaches) between January 2016 and January 2018 in a single tertiary center. RESULTS Lesion site (peripheral vs. central) and localization (anterior vs. posterior) were equally comparable among two groups, but maximum diameter of multiparametric-MRI Index lesion was slightly superior in the in-bore MRI-GB group (14 vs. 12 mm, P=0.002). Mean random biopsy cores taken were 11.2±2.1, with 1.3±2 positive cores in FUSION-GB group. Mean number of targeted biopsy cores taken was significantly superior in the FUSION-GB group as compared to the in-bore MRI-GB group (2.6±0.7 vs.1.7±1, P<0.001), whereas mean number of positive targeted biopsy cores was comparable between two groups (1±1.3 vs.1±0.9, P=0.1). 70 (45.5%) and 75 (52.8%) patients had positive targeted bioptic cores at pathologic examination among FUSION-GB and in-bore MRI-GB groups, respectively (P=0.2). Bioptical ISUP grade was also comparable among two groups (P=0.2) in multivariate analysis PI-RADS Score (OR=3.04 and OR=8.32 for PI-RADS 4 and 5, respectively) and PSA density (OR=2.69) were identified as independent predictors of positive targeted cores at histological examination (P<0.001 and P=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In-bore MRI-GB approaches represent a promising technique that may offer some advantages compared to standard systematic FUSION-GB despite higher costs of in bore-procedure. Our experience, although not showing a clear advantage between the FUSION technique and the "in-bore" technique, resulted safe and feasible and represents a viable procedure for the diagnosis and characterization of prostate especially in a subgroup of patient with clinically significant disease. Further investigations are needed in order to identify the best approach for MRI-GB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele D'Agostino
- Department of Robotic Urological Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy -
| | | | | | - Paolo Corsi
- Department of Robotic Urological Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniele Romagnoli
- Department of Robotic Urological Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Giampaoli
- Department of Robotic Urological Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Robotic Urological Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Robotic Urological Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Noureldin M, Eldred-Evans D, Khoo CC, Winkler M, Sokhi H, Tam H, Ahmed HU. Review article: MRI-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis and management. World J Urol 2020; 39:57-63. [PMID: 32253585 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy has been the traditional biopsy route in the detection of prostate cancer. However, due to concern regarding overdetection of low-risk cancer and missed clinically significant cancers as well as risk of sepsis, alternative approaches have been explored. Transperineal template biopsy-sampling the gland every 5 m to 10 mm-reduces error by sampling the whole prostate but increases risk of detecting clinically insignificant cancers as well as conferring risks of side effects such as urinary retention and bleeding. METHODS There are various targeted biopsy techniques, each with different cancer detection rates, costs and learning curves. Current research focuses on refining biopsy methodology to maximize detection of significant cancers, whilst minimising invasiveness and complications. In this article, the up-to-date research data about MRI-targeted prostate biopsy were reviewed to show its utilization in prostate cancer management and diagnosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Prostate multiparametric MRI has become an effective tool in the detection of significant cancers and an essential component of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway incorporating MRI-guided biopsy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Noureldin
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. .,Urology Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - D Eldred-Evans
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C C Khoo
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H Sokhi
- Department of Radiology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - H Tam
- Department of Radiology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
[Initial results of perineal MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsies under local anesthesia without standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis]. Urologe A 2020; 59:1225-1230. [PMID: 32161979 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01164-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The perineal approach for prostate biopsy (PB) is a sterile alternative to conventional transrectal PB. Targeted local anesthesia allows perineal prostate biopsy (pPB) to be performed without general anesthesia. This paper presents the first results after establishing perineal MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy (pFB) under local anesthesia without standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. For this purpose, 144 patients were included in the study after pFB at the Vivantes Klinikum am Urban. No peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis was applied. Peri- and postoperatively, the pain sensation, measured using an analogue pain scale from 0-10, and complications were recorded. The median patient age was 68 and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value 7.07 ng/ml. In all, 49% of the patients received primary PB. The overall detection rate for prostate cancer (PCa) was 71% and for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 was 44, 71 and 92%, respectively. The median pain sensation during biopsy was 2. Furthermore, 63% of patients with a transrectal prebiopsy considered this to be more painful and another 20% expressed similar pain levels. Only 1 patient developed a febrile urinary tract infection. The pFB of the prostate under local anesthesia without antibiotic, perioperative prophylaxis is a suitable alternative to the transrectal PB with regard to the detection rate of PCa, the side effect profile and the subjective pain perception of the patients during the intervention.
Collapse
|
43
|
Franklin A, Gianduzzo T, Yaxley J, Kua B, Coughlin G, Samaratunga H, Gianduzzo T. Use of a trizonal schema to assess targeting accuracy in prostatic fusion biopsy. BJU Int 2020; 126 Suppl 1:6-11. [PMID: 32104968 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the use of a novel 'trizonal' biopsy schema in which 'near-target' biopsies are taken adjacent to the MRI lesion, in addition to target and systematic biopsies, to determine the accuracy of prostate MRI fusion systems. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A trizonal biopsy technique was used to evaluate 75 men with small Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions (<15 mm) identified from a prospective cohort of 290 men undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected prostate cancer at a single high-volume institution between September 2017 and May 2019. In addition to target and systematic biopsies, near-target biopsies were taken 4 mm from the apparent border of the MRI lesion. Comparisons were made between highest International Society of Urological Pathology grade and longest tumour length. RESULTS Fifty-three men with significant prostate cancer in the same quadrant as the target were included in the final analysis. The percentages of positive cores from target, near-target and MRI-negative zones were 66%, 39% and 17%, respectively. Significant cancer was detected in the near-target zone in 77% of cases when the target zone was positive. A total of 17% of participants were upgraded by a median (range) of 1 (1-3) grades through the addition of near-target cores. Notably, 9% of men were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer solely via the near-target biopsy cores when the target cores were negative. CONCLUSION The use of near-target biopsies as part of a trizonal biopsy schema provides a novel methodology to optimize clinically significant prostate cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Franklin
- Wesley Medical Research, Wesley Hospital, University of Queensland
| | | | - John Yaxley
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Wesley Hospital, University of Queensland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Norris JM, Simpson BS, Parry MA, Allen C, Ball R, Freeman A, Kelly D, Kirkham A, Kasivisvanathan V, Whitaker HC, Emberton M. Genetic landscape of prostate cancer conspicuity on multiparametric MRI: a protocol for a systematic review and bioinformatic analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034611. [PMID: 31992607 PMCID: PMC7045175 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The introduction of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has enabled enhanced risk stratification for men at risk of prostate cancer, through accurate prebiopsy identification of clinically significant disease. However, approximately 10%-20% of significant prostate cancer may be missed on mpMRI. It appears that the genomic basis of lesion visibility or invisibility on mpMRI may have key implications for prognosis and treatment. Here, we describe a protocol for the first systematic review and novel bioinformatic analysis of the genomic basis of prostate cancer conspicuity on mpMRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases will be conducted. Screening, data extraction, statistical analysis and reporting will be performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included papers will be full text articles, written between January 1980 and December 2019, comparing molecular characteristics of mpMRI-visible lesions and mpMRI-invisible lesions at the DNA, DNA-methylation, RNA or protein level. Study bias and quality will be assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa score. Additionally, we will conduct a novel bioinformatic analysis of supplementary material and publicly available data, to combine transcriptomic data and reveal common pathways highlighted across studies. To ensure methodological rigour, this protocol is written in accordance with the PRISMA Protocol 2015 checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval will not be required, as this is an academic review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, and presentations at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019147423.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Benjamin S Simpson
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marina A Parry
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rhys Ball
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stabile A, Giganti F, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS, Villeirs G, Gill IS, Allen C, Emberton M, Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:41-61. [PMID: 31316185 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0212-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer has resulted in overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in many men. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has been identified as a test that could mitigate these diagnostic errors. The performance of mpMRI can vary depending on the population being studied, the execution of the MRI itself, the experience of the radiologist, whether additional biomarkers are considered and whether mpMRI-targeted biopsy is carried out alone or in addition to systematic biopsy. A number of challenges to implementation remain, such as ensuring high-quality execution and reporting of mpMRI and ensuring that this diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. Nevertheless, emerging clinical trial data support the adoption of this technology as part of the standard of care for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Stabile
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhen L, Liu X, Yegang C, Yongjiao Y, Yawei X, Jiaqi K, Xianhao W, Yuxuan S, Rui H, Wei Z, Ningjing O. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1244. [PMID: 31870327 PMCID: PMC6929472 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The application of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for diagnosis of prostate cancer has been recommended by the European Association of Urology (EAU), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature on assessing the accuracy of mpMRI in patients with suspicion of prostate cancer. Method We searched Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane online databases from January 12,000 to October 272,018 to extract articles exploring the possibilities that the pre-biopsy mpMRI can enhance the diagnosis accuracy of prostate cancer. The numbers of true- and false-negative results and true- and false-positive ones were extracted to calculate the corresponding sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 tool. Random effects meta-analysis and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) plot were performed for further study. Results After searching, we acquired 3741 articles for reference, of which 29 studies with 8503 participants were eligible for inclusion. MpMRI maintained impressive diagnostic value, the area under the HSROC curve was 0.87 (95%CI,0.84–0.90). The sensitivity and specificity for mpMRI were 0.87 [95%CI, 0.81–0.91] and 0.68 [95%CI,0.56–0.79] respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 2.73 [95%CI 1.90–3.90]; negative likelihood ratio was 0.19 [95% CI 0.14,-0.27]. The risk of publication bias was negligible with P = 0.96. Conclusion Results of the meta-analysis suggest that mpMRI is a sensitive tool to diagnose prostate cancer. However, because of the high heterogeneity existing among the included studies, further studies are needed to apply the results of this meta-analysis in clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zhen
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
| | - Chen Yegang
- Department of Urology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Yongjiao
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Yawei
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Kang Jiaqi
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Wang Xianhao
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Song Yuxuan
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Hu Rui
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhang Wei
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| | - Ou Ningjing
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wajswol E, Winoker JS, Anastos H, Falagario U, Okhawere K, Martini A, Treacy P, Voutsinas N, Knauer CJ, Sfakianos JP, Lewis SC, Taouli BA, Rastinehad AR. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion‐guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter‐reader variability on cancer detection. BJU Int 2019; 125:531-540. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Wajswol
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Jared S. Winoker
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Harry Anastos
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Kennedy Okhawere
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | | | - Nicholas Voutsinas
- Department of Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Cynthia J Knauer
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - John P. Sfakianos
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Sara C. Lewis
- Department of Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Bachir A. Taouli
- Department of Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| | - Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
- Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
- Department of Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
He BM, Shi ZK, Li HS, Lin HZ, Yang QS, Lu JP, Sun YH, Wang HF. A Novel Prediction Tool Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine the Biopsy Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PSA Levels Less than 50 ng/ml. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1284-1295. [PMID: 31848822 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08111-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and internally validate nomograms to help choose the optimal biopsy strategy among no biopsy, targeted biopsy (TB) only, or TB plus systematic biopsy (SB). PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study included a total of 385 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided TB and/or SB at our institute after undergoing multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) between 2015 and 2018. We developed models to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based on suspicious lesions from a TB result and based on the whole prostate gland from the results of TB plus SB or SB only. Nomograms were generated using logistic regression and evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curves and decision analysis. The results were validated using ROC curve and calibration on 177 patients from 2018 to 2019 at the same institute. RESULTS In the multivariate analyses, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score were predictors of csPCa in both nomograms. Age was also included in the model for suspicious lesions, while obesity was included in the model for the whole gland. The area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analyses of the prediction models was 0.755 for suspicious lesions and 0.887 for the whole gland. Both models performed well in the calibration and decision analyses. In the validation cohort, the ROC curve described the AUCs of 0.723 and 0.917 for the nomogram of suspicious lesions and nomogram of the whole gland, respectively. Also, the calibration curve detected low error rates for both models. CONCLUSION Nomograms with excellent discriminative ability were developed and validated. These nomograms can be used to select the optimal biopsy strategy for individual patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi-Ming He
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Kai Shi
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hu-Sheng Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Heng-Zhi Lin
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing-Song Yang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-Ping Lu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying-Hao Sun
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Hai-Feng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Latifoltojar A, Appayya MB, Barrett T, Punwani S. Similarities and differences between Likert and PIRADS v2.1 scores of prostate multiparametric MRI: a pictorial review of histology-validated cases. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:895.e1-895.e15. [PMID: 31627804 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2019 "Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management" guidelines have recommended that all patients suspected of prostate cancer undergo multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) prior to biopsy. The Likert scoring system is advocated for mpMRI reporting based on multicentre studies that have demonstrated its effectiveness within the National Health Service (NHS). In recent years, there has been considerable drive towards standardised prostate reporting, which led to the development of "Prostate Imaging-Reporting And Data System" (PI-RADS). The PI-RADS system has been adopted by the majority of European countries and within the US. This paper reviews these systems indicating the similarities and specific differences that exist between PI-RADS and Likert assessment through a series of histologically proven clinical cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Latifoltojar
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Division of Medicine, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK
| | - M B Appayya
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Division of Medicine, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK
| | - T Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, 277 Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, 277 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - S Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Division of Medicine, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Prospective multicentre study using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the focal treatment of prostate cancer: Safety outcomes and complications. Urol Oncol 2019; 38:225-230. [PMID: 31628038 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate focal therapy using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (CaP), we analyzed the safety and complications of this procedure. METHODS Patients (pts) eligible for this multicenter prospective cohort study suffered from low to intermediate risk localized CaP with no prior treatment. After tumor identification on multiparametric MRI and in prostate biopsy, the lesions were treated with HIFU observing a safety margin of 8 to 10 mm. Adverse events (AE) after 30 and 90 days, as well as the required interventions were assessed and stratified for treatment localizations. RESULTS Of the 98 men included in the study in two European centers, 35 (35.7%) experienced AEs in the first 30 days after HIFU intervention with Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ II: 15 pts (15.3%) had a postoperative urinary tract infection and 26 pts (26.5%) a urinary retention. Four pts (4.1%) underwent subsequent intervention (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa/b). The number of late postoperative complications occurring between 30 and 90 days after intervention was low (2.0%). The highest complication rate was associated with tumors located at the anterior base (50.0%). The inclusion of the urethra in the ablation zone led to AEs in 20 out of 41 cases (48.8%) and represented a significant risk factor for complications within 30 days (odds ratio = 2.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.08-5.96; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS Focal therapy of CaP lesions with a robotic HIFU-probe is safe and renders an acceptable rate of minor early AEs. The inclusion of the urethra in the ablation zone leads to an increase in early complications and should be avoided whenever possible.
Collapse
|