Promoting False-Lumen Thrombosis after Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection by Selectively Excluding False-Lumen Distal Entry Tears

Outcomes of fenestrated endovascular abdominal aortic repair in distal entry tears of chronic debakey IIIb aortic dissection

Currently, there have been very few reports within the literature which specifically address using fenestrated and branched stent grafts to completely isolate and repair distal entry tears of chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a 3-dimensional (3D) printed aortic model-guided fenestrated stent in the treatment of distal tears of chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The study was a one-center retrospective study comprising 36 patients who underwent TEVAR and fenestrated endovascular abdominal aortic repair (F-EVAR) between April 2014 and December 2022. Patient data was compiled and analysed for preoperative, intraoperative, and perioperative characteristics. In total, 36 patients (12 females and 24 males) were incorporated into this study. All of the patients included in this study had hypertension, and among them, the leading cause for undergoing II-stage F-EVAR was the progression of a false lumen, accounting for 24 cases (66.7% of the total). The technical success rate was 97.2% and there were no cases of 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, permanent paraparesis, or organ failure. One year post-F-EVAR treatment, surviving patients showed significant false and true lumen remodelling with 100% complete false-lumen thrombosis. A total of five patients died during the follow-up, two patients died related to aorta complications and three patients died of heart failure, multiple organ failure, or septic shock. II-stage F-EVAR was safe and feasible operation to repair all distal tears of chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection.

Age-related difference in acute type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to compare the characteristics of clinical data, imaging data, and treatment methods of young and old patients with acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD).

METHODS

ABAD patients admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, such as gender, age, diabetes, hypertension, presenting symptoms, imaging characteristics, laboratory data on admission, hemodynamics on admission and in-hospital management, and mortality of different age groups were compared and analyzed. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

A total of 141 ABAD patients were included in this study. Old ABAD patients were more likely to have a prior history of hypertension (88.6% vs 70.4%, p = 0.037) and atherosclerosis (29.8% vs 7.4%, p = 0.016). In the young group, Marfan syndrome was significantly higher (14.8% vs 0.9%; p = 0.005). Compared with the old group, the number of distal tears in the young group was significantly higher (62.3% vs 39.5%, p = 0.027). The proportion of patients with malperfusion of lower limbs in the young group was significantly higher than that in the old group (22.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in the treatment methods and in-hospital mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with old ABAD patients, young ABAD patients had more distal tears and a higher proportion of lower limbs malperfusion.

Aortic remodeling after endovascular aortic repair and tailored distal entry tears exclusion in Crawford type III or IV dissection aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can only promote 55-80% false lumen (FL) thrombosis when only the proximal primary tear is covered during the repair of type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This study evaluated the effectiveness and clinical outcome of tailored exclusion of the primary entry tear with TEVAR and distal fenestrations with ancillary devices in patients with subacute or chronic Crawford type III and IV aortic dissection aneurysm.

METHODS

All patients underwent either TEVAR for primary entry tear; subsequently, various ancillary devices were applied on each distal fenestration. These techniques included covered stent occlusion of detached visceral artery entry tears, TL stenting and FL occlusion with vascular plugs in the common iliac artery dissection, or TEVAR coverage for multiple fenestrations from segmental arteries. This case series included nine patients (seven men and two women; mean age: 63.4 years) during January 2013 to May 2019. Outcome analysis included the rates of technical success and procedure-related complications, completeness of FL occlusion, aortic remodeling, and midterm mortality at 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 37.7 months without in-hospital mortality. One patient was lost to follow-up at the second month, the rest of patients were all alive during the follow-up period. All patients achieved complete FL thrombosis, and six patients exhibited aneurysm diameter shrinkage.

CONCLUSION

Tailored exclusion of visceral and iliac distal fenestrations with proximal primary tear coverage can promote FL thrombosis and aortic remodeling in the visceral aortic segment in patients with Crawford type III or IV aortic dissection aneurysm.

Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard treatment for acute complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). However, long-term results reveal that TEVAR does not achieve a complete aortic remodeling and poses a risk of aneurysmal aortic degeneration. Distal reentry treatment at the abdominal level seems to be necessary to obtain a complete remodeling in TBAD. Moreover, it is necessary to treat the aortoiliac bifurcation in patients with persistent true lumen collapse or limb ischemia.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and October 2019, 11 patients with acute or sub-acute complicated TBAD or non-A non-B aortic dissection were treated in our institution in an endovascular fashion. We performed the stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair (STABLISE) technique in all cases, but two cases required complementary treatment of the aortoiliac bifurcation with a bifurcated AFX endograft system for limb ischemia due to true lumen collapse.

RESULTS

Technical success was obtained in all patients. No procedural complications occurred. No postoperative deaths, stroke, paraplegia, mesenteric, or renal ischemia were observed, and no secondary intervention was necessary. Satisfactory aortic remodeling was obtained after the follow-up periods with a 57.5% mean true lumen expansion.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience using the extended STABILISE (e-STABILISE) technique using a bifurcated AFX endograft did not result in any postoperative mortality or complications. Without additional data, this technique should be reserved for specific patients who require revascularization of the aortoiliac bifurcation.

Methods and outcomes of endovascular false lumen embolization for thoracic aortic dissection

PURPOSE

To provide a contemporary review on endovascular false lumen (FL) embolization for thoracic aortic dissection (AD) and evaluate its early outcome.

METHODS

A systematic literature review on FL embolization for thoracic AD from January 2003 to December 2020 was performed under the instruction of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. Each article was analyzed using a standardized protocol including predefined demographic characteristics, perioperative mortality and major complications.

RESULTS

A total of 29 papers with 229 patients were included into the analysis. The methods of FL occlusion used were: the Candy-Plug technique, the knickerbocker technique, the "cork in the bottleneck" technique and direct FL embolization with combination of stent-grafts, coils, onyx, plugs and glue. FL embolization procedure was performed in 79 patients (34.5%) with type A AD and 150 (65.5%) with type B AD. FL direct embolization was the most frequently used technique, and it was applied in 198 (86.5%) patients. Candy-plug, knickerbocker and "cork in the bottleneck" techniques were used in 26 (11.4%), 3 (1.3%) and 2 (0.9%) patients, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all patients except one (228/229, 99.6%) in which implantation of a stent to celiac trunk was not possible. There were four hospital deaths (1.7%). Neurological complications occurred in 6 patients (2.6%), including 4 (1.7%) spinal cord ischemia and 2 (0.9%) ischemic stroke. There were 1 (0.4%) iatrogenic retrograde dissection and 2 (0.9%) renal failure reported. The mean duration of follow-up was 16.5 months. There were 21 deaths (9.3%) during follow-up, and 8 (3.6%) were aorta-related. Thirty-three (14.7%) secondary intervention were performed. Five patients (2.2%) required open completion thoracoabdominal procedure incorporating the stent-graft into the repair. Complete FL thrombosis was observed in 181 (80.4%) patients, 34 (15.1%) had partial thrombosis, and 10 (4.4%) had FL progression.

CONCLUSIONS

FL embolization of the distal thoracic aorta is a promising technique in a group of patients to promote FL thrombosis and aortic remodeling in thoracic aorta.

Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application

Open surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for acute type A aortic dissection and should be offered to most patients. However, there are elderly patients in which surgical treatment may be deemed extremely high risk or futile. Endovascular treatment approaches have been applied to a small number of these patients and data are limited to case reports and small series. The application of endovascular therapies to ascending aorta is currently limited by anatomical and technical challenges posed by the dynamic motion of the ascending aorta and the proximity of vital structures to intended landing zones (aortic valve, coronary arteries, and supra-aortic branches) and lack of specially designed endografts to address these issues. While thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has replaced open aortic repair for a suitable lesion in distal aortic dissection, some selected patients with type A aortic dissection at high surgical may be candidates. Hence, there is potential because, in proximal (Stanford type A) dissections, 10–30% of patients are not accepted for surgery, and 30–50% are technically amenable for TEVAR. Recent experience has shown that carefully selected patients with favorable anatomical characteristics may be subject to endovascular stent-graft treatment as a last resort with mixed results. Technical improvement is necessary to offer. satisfactory endovascular options in non-surgical candidates.

Risk factors and treatment outcomes for type B aortic dissection with malperfusion requiring adjunctive procedures after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors for unrelieved malperfusion after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) alone.

METHODS

From January 2009 to December 2019, 86 patients with type B aortic dissection-induced malperfusion were enrolled. Demographics and clinical and imaging data, as well as treatment outcomes, were collected and compared between patients with malperfusion relieved by TEVAR alone (TR) or by TEVAR with adjunctive procedures (TA).

RESULTS

Among the 86 enrolled patients, 17 (19.8%) had malperfusion requiring TA. Patients in the TA group were more likely to suffer lower limb ischemia (P = .004), present with severe ischemia (P = .003), and have more than one end-organ ischemia (P = .015). There were more involved vessels classified as the mixed type in the TA group (P = .002). Mixed ischemia was the only independent risk factor for malperfusion requiring TA (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-17.2; P = .017). The ischemia-related in-hospital mortality rate of the TA group was significantly higher than that of the TR group (P = .023), and malperfusion requiring TA was the only risk factor in the multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio, 14.6; 95% CI, 1.4-150.5; P = .025). The 5-year overall cumulative survival rates were 82.4% (95% CI, 66.1%-100.0%) in the TA group and 89.5% (95% CI, 81.6%-98.1%) in the TR group (P = .294).

CONCLUSIONS

Type B aortic dissection-induced malperfusion requiring TA was associated with a higher ischemia-related in-hospital mortality rate. Mixed obstruction was an independent risk factor for unrelieved malperfusion after TEVAR alone, and early identification of potential patients requiring TA could thereby be achieved. Reasonable treatment strategies could contribute to the successful management of malperfusion requiring TA.

IMPACT OF THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR TIMING ON AORTIC REMODELING IN ACUTE TYPE B AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly utilized in the management of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (TBIMH). Optimal timing for intervention has not been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate TEVAR timing on post-operative aortic remodeling.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent TEVAR for TBIMH from January 2008 to September 2018. Imaging was reviewed pre- and postoperatively. Primary data points included true lumen diameter (TLD) and total aortic diameter (TAD) at the site of maximal pathology. Primary endpoint was aortic remodeling evidenced by a TAD/TLD ratio closest to 1.0. Secondary outcome was occurrence of aortic-related adverse events and mortality (AREM): aortic rupture, aortic-related death, progression to dissection or need for aortic re-intervention within 12 months. Patients undergoing emergent TEVAR (within 24 hours, 'eTEVAR') were compared to the remainder - delayed TEVAR ('dTEVAR').

RESULTS

We analyzed 71 patients that underwent TEVAR FOR TBIMH; 25 underwent emergent TEVAR and 46 patients underwent dTEVAR (median: 5.5 days, range: 2-120 days). There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities and patients did not differ in presenting IMH thickness (12.6±3.1 mm vs. 11.3±4.1 mm, p=0.186) nor presenting TAD/TLD ratio (1.535±0.471 vs. 1.525±0.397, p=0.928) for eTEVAR and dTEVAR groups, respectively. eTEVAR patients had larger average presenting maximal descending aortic (DTA) diameter (45.8±14.3 mm vs. 38.2±7.5 mm, p=0.018) and higher incidence of penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) on presenting CT angiography (52.0% vs 21.7%, p=0.033). Thirty day mortality was 2/25 (8.0%) for eTEVAR and 2/45 (4.4%) for dTEVAR (p=0.602). Postoperative aortic remodeling was more complete in the dTEVAR group (1.23±0.12 vs. 1.33±0.15, p=0.004). Case-control matching (controlling for presenting DTA diameter and PAU) on 30 patients still showed better aortic remodeling in the dTEVAR group (1.125±0.100 vs 1.348±0.42, p<0.001). The incidence of AREM was higher in the eTEVAR - 6/25 (24.0%) - group compared to the dTEVAR group - 2/46 (4.3%). At 12 months, freedom from AREM was higher in the dTEVAR group (95.7% vs. 76.0%, p=0.011). Postoperative TAD/TLD ratio was the best predictor for late aortic-related adverse events (AUROC=0.825, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

TEVAR for acute type B IMH within 24 hours of admission is associated with lower aortic remodeling and higher occurrence of late aortic related adverse events and mortality. Delaying TEVAR when clinically possible could improve aortic remodeling and aortic-related outcomes.

Penetration of Dissected Membrane for False Lumen Embolization in a Case of Chronic Aortic Dissection

Background: Patent false lumens carry a high risk of aortic events including rupture. False lumen embolization is a useful method to promote thrombosis of false lumen. In the case presented here, direct penetration of the dissected membrane was employed to obtain access to the false lumen, enabling embolization. Case report: The case was a 64-year-old female who developed a Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Replacement of ascending aorta and aortic arch with frozen elephant trunk technique was performed. After the operation, there was a residual flow through the false lumen in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. Twenty months later, the patient complained of sudden back pain, and a CT scan demonstrated another new dissection at the distal edge of the open stent. Additionally, the false lumen that had remained since the onset of the type A aortic dissection enlarged during the observation period. An endovascular procedure was planned to exclude the false lumen. Despite closing all communicating channels between true and false lumen using a vascular plug, coils, and stent grafts, the false lumen continued to expand due to the residual flow at the visceral segment. The origin responsible for the flow was not identified. To perform an embolization of the false lumen, access into the false lumen was obtained by penetration of the dissected flap using a trans-septal needle. Following the successful penetration of the flap, embolization of the false lumen was performed using coils and glue. After the embolization, an angiogram of the false lumen confirmed the significant reduction of leakage into the true lumen. The size of the aorta and false lumen decreased after the embolization. Conclusion: Direct penetration of the dissected membrane of the aorta was a safe and useful measure for regaining access to the false lumen and for the following endovascular intervention.

Outcomes of endovascular therapy for Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS).

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2019, patients with MFS who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were enrolled. Demographic data, preoperative and perioperative clinical profiles, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The cumulative survival and freedom from reintervention rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 38.5 ± 10.7 (range, 24-64 years). The in-hospital mortality was 0. The cumulative survival rate was 88.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.5%-98.5%) at 5 years and 82.9% (95% CI, 60.2%-93.3%) at 10 years. Patients with a thrombosed false lumen (FL) along the length of the stent had a significantly higher cumulative survival rate (P < .05) and freedom from reintervention (P = .01) than patients with patent FL. The freedom from reintervention was 83.4% (95% CI, 61.4% to 93.4%) at 5 years and 50.3% (95% CI, 21.4%-97.3%) at 10 years. There was no significant difference freedom from reintervention in freedom from reintervention between patients with and those without a previous aortic root procedure (P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR can be performed safely and effectively for TBAD in patients with MFS. Perioperative mortality and morbidity were low; however, lifelong close follow-up in the clinic and imaging are mandatory to prevent aortic rupture. Patients with a patent FL were at high risk of late death.

A Successful Endovascular Technique for Complete False Lumen Thrombosis in Chronic Abdominal Aortic Dissection

A 66-year-old man presented with an enlarging abdominal aorta false lumen, after type A aortic dissection repair. Residual entries were located at the left renal artery, abdominal aorta, and left external iliac artery. The patient underwent endovascular aortic repair with left renal artery stenting to close the entries. Completion aortography showed no false lumen flow without an endoleak, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography 1 month after the procedure demonstrated complete false lumen thrombosis. A total endovascular approach is possible for abdominal aneurysmal dilation in chronic aortic dissection when all entries can be closed using a one-stage procedure with stent grafts and/or branch stenting.

Influence of Distal Re-entry Tears on False Lumen Thrombosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation

PURPOSE

Distal re-entry tears play a significant role in false lumen (FL) thrombosis, which will strongly affect the postoperative long-term survival of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This study aimed to investigate the influence of a peculiar morphological parameter of the residual re-entry tears in TBAD patients after TEVAR on long-term FL thrombosis using the computational fluid dynamics.

METHODS

Ideal population-based three-dimensional models of post-operative TBAD were established. Numerical simulation was performed to investigate the hemodynamic differences caused by different tear features, including the tear count, the maximum distance between tears, and the tear area.

RESULTS

Although the low relative residence time (RRT) area did not change significantly when the tear distance was fixed, the area of oscillatory shear index (OSI) > 0.45 and endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) > 1.5 decreased significantly with the tear count and area increased and a dramatic increase in blood flow into the FL was also observed. When tear count and total area were fixed, for each 10-mm increase in the maximum distance between tears, the area of low RRT in the FL increased significantly, while the average pressure difference increased by 10.85%.

CONCLUSION

The different morphology of the re-entry tears had different effects on the thrombosis-related hemodynamic parameters in FL following TEVAR. and the number of re-entry tears was most crucial to the potential thrombosis in the post-TEVAR FL of TBAD patients.

Twelve-Month Computed Tomography Follow-Up after Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Acute Complicated Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

To explore the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on aortic remodeling (AR) and the relationship between AR and complications after TEVAR.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients (2 type IIIA aortic dissection [AD] and 54 type IIIB AD) with complicated acute type B aortic dissection suitable for TEVAR were prospectively enrolled. There were 44 men (78%) and 12 women (22%) with an average age of 54 ± 13.8 years. Aortic enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed pre-TEVAR and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The morphological changes in AR, namely aortic volume and false lumen thrombosis, were obtained by analyzing the CT data. The effect of TEVAR on AR was determined by the morphological changes in the aorta. The relationship between AR index, false lumen thrombosis, and complications was analyzed.

RESULTS

The volume of the thoracic aortic true lumen gradually increased post-TEVAR, whereas the volume of the thoracic aortic false lumen gradually decreased. The volume of abdominal aortic total lumen and false lumen increased 6 months postoperatively. The AR index increased significantly 3 months postoperatively, which was negatively correlated with complications and mortality. The thoracic and abdominal aortic false lumen thrombosis developed gradually after TEVAR, and the degree of thoracic aortic false lumen thrombosis was negatively correlated with complications and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR promotes AR. AR index and the degree of thoracic aortic false lumen thrombosis can serve as predictors of complications and mortality.

Impact of Endovascular False Lumen Embolization on Thoracic Aortic Remodeling in Chronic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Retrograde false lumen (FL) perfusion after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic dissection is a mode of treatment failure. Thrombosis of the FL is associated with favorable reverse remodeling. Objectives are to describe FL embolization (FLE) strategy and assess aortic remodeling and survival.

METHODS

From January 2009 to December 2017, 51 patients with chronic dissection underwent FLE, most after previous TEVAR. Devices included a combination of iliac plug (29 patients), coils (19 patients), or nitinol plug (3 patients). Computed tomography was performed before discharge, at 3 months, and annually (median follow-up 2 years [range, 1 month to 7 years]).

RESULTS

After FLE, mean maximum aortic diameter decreased (64.2 ± 12 mm to 61.0 ± 13 mm; P = .03), true lumen diameter increased (24.7 ± 10 mm to 33.7 ± 8 mm; P < .001), and FL diameter decreased (36.7 ± 12 mm to 25.6 ± 15 mm, P < .001). For reverse remodeling, FL thrombosis with ≥10% decrease in diameter and ≥10% increase in true lumen diameter was achieved in 20 (39.2%; 16 primarily, 4 secondarily). Nine patients progressed after the first FLE: persistent FL flow with increase in aortic diameter and underwent repeat FLE with complete thrombosis (n = 4) or open thoracoabdominal completion (n = 5). A total of 26 patients had indeterminate response (FL thrombosis without change in maximum diameter), and none have required reoperation. Six patients had complete obliteration of the entire FL. At last follow-up, 42 (82%) patients were alive. Three deaths were related to aortic pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

FLE is an important endovascular adjunct to TEVAR promoting reverse aortic remodeling in select patients with chronic aortic dissection and persistent retrograde FL perfusion.

Outcomes of Selective Strategies for Distal Entry Tears After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Distal entry tears have undesirable influence in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), including inhibition of aortic remolding and increase of late aortic events. Therefore, distal entry tears should be managed. Nowadays, main strategies for managing distal entry tears included total and selective strategies. However, which strategy is better still remains controversial. The objective of the study is to investigate the outcomes of selective strategy for distal entry tears after TEVAR in TBAD.

METHODS

A total of 43 consecutive patients with TBAD with distal entry tears after TEVAR were administered with selective strategy for distal entry tears, including occlusion of the tear in the thoracic aortic segment, thrombosis of the reverse blood flow channel in the false lumen, and selective occlusion of distal entry tears. Mortality, complications, and aortic remolding in early follow-up (12 months after operation) were analyzed.

RESULTS

All 43 patients survived during the follow-up period. Operation was performed again for femoral artery reconstruction in 1 patient who had occlusion of the approach vessel during the follow-up period, and the remaining 42 patients had no uncomfortable symptoms and operation-related complications. The maximum diameter of the aorta was 32.03 ± 6.35 mm and 27.36 ± 4.92 mm, respectively, for before and after reintervention, and the difference was significant (t = 5.899, P < 0.001). The unthrombotic range of the false lumen after reintervention was significantly shrunken in all patients, compared with the range before reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective strategy was safe and effective, at least in early follow-up. Its effectiveness should be further verified by more clinical observation results and long-term follow-up results.

Distal Extended Endovascular Aortic Repair PETTICOAT: A Modified Technique to Improve False Lumen Remodeling in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Data from the literature suggest that in patients with acute, complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD), initial successful treatment with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is not necessarily associated with favorable remodeling of the dissected aorta during follow-up, and long-term results indicate that TEVAR failed to completely suppress false lumen patency. Sealing of all relevant distal reentries, infrarenal and/or iliac, seems to be the key issue to induce total false lumen thrombosis in abdominal aorta as well as the iliac arteries, especially in complicated patients presenting with malperfusion or complete true lumen collapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 34 consecutive patients diagnosed with cTBAD at our hospital from January 2015 to April 2018, 30 had complicated dissections receiving endovascular treatment according to the standard Provisional ExTension To Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT) technique and were excluded from this study, whereas 4 patients with radiologic evidence of multiple reentry tears at detached lumbar arteries and iliac bifurcation with complete true lumen collapse and clinical evidence of malperfusion were treated with a modified PETTICOAT technique with distal extension of the aortic stent, balloon expansion of the stented true lumen, and use of the AFX bifurcated endograft system to preserve the natural aortic bifurcation and provide complete distal sealing of reentry tears.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was achieved in all patients. No postoperative deaths were observed, but 1 patient experienced an hemorrhagic shock on the second postoperative day. No patient suffered postoperative stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, or acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an abdominal aortic bifurcated endograft with PETTICOAT to treat acute cTBAD seems to be a feasible approach in high-risk patients to improve aortic remodeling. The AFX bifurcated endograft system meets the requirements of anatomical fixation and sealing of distal tears.

Impact of Renal Artery Stent-Graft Placement on Renal Function in Chronic Aortic Dissection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of renal stent-graft placement on kidney function and size alternation in chronic aortic dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients with chronic aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair who underwent renal stent-graft placement between January 2015 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-three patients with chronic aortic dissection who received thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the same period were reviewed as a control group for kidney volume comparison.

RESULTS

Twenty-five stent-grafts were deployed over 25 renal arteries. Overall renal function was assessed by the slope of the regression line constructed from the plots of creatinine clearance versus time within 2 years after the procedure (-0.2810 vs -0.3146 mL/min^-1/mo^-1, P = .868), kidney volume at 12 months (129.4 ± 40.9 vs 137.0 ± 44.2 cm², P = .193) and effective renal plasma flow at 6 months (106.3 ± 46.9 vs 124.4 ± 55.5 mL/min, P = .050) and was not significantly deteriorated. Seven treated patients (87.5%) with a renal artery supplied by a false lumen had a decrease in kidney volume, as did 14 patients (56%) in the control group (P = .206). Three patients with a dissected renal artery (75%) in the stent-graft group had an increase in kidney volume compared with 1 patient (11.1%) in the control group (P = .052).

CONCLUSIONS

Occlusion of the re-entry tear by a stent-graft in the renal artery remains a safe strategy to promote false lumen thrombosis. The stent-graft poses a potential risk of reducing the kidney volume in kidneys supplied by the false lumen but may provide a positive effect in kidney volume with a concomitant dissected renal artery in chronic aortic dissection.

Techniques and outcomes of false lumen embolization in chronic type B aortic dissection

Endovascular strategies have been increasingly used for the treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) offering better outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity compared to open surgical repair. Aortic remodeling after standard TEVAR is less likely in cTBAD due to rigidity of the dissection membrane. Another limitation of endovascular therapy is continued retrograde false lumen perfusion with back-flow from distal entry tears. Treatment strategies in cTBAD should aim at false lumen thrombosis. There are many approaches to achieve this goal of false lumen thrombosis, but concepts as open surgery or fenestrated and branched endovascular repair are limited by either high technical and logistic demands to the surgeon or high rates of mortality and morbidity. False lumen embolization techniques offer less invasive treatment strategies with promising early results. The main strategies for false lumen embolization include the "cork in the bottle neck" technique, the Candy-Plug technique or the Knickerbocker-technique. This article describes technical aspects and early results of these new endovascular techniques of false lumen embolization in chronic aortic dissection.

Radical treatment of primary type B aortic dissection or after thoracic endovascular aortic repair to manage disseminated intravascular coagulation

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) secondary to type B aortic dissection is an unusual and fatal complication that has not been fully investigated. The aim of our study is to report a novel endovascular technique excluding all tears to manage DIC. From April 2017 to October 2017, we performed 2 cases of DIC complicated to type B aortic dissection using this novel radical endovascular repair technique. Clinical data of patients were collected and technical details were presented. These two cases were successfully treated with novel radical endovascular repair technique. DIC was managed and FL thrombosis was formed in these two patients. Follow-up at 6 months revealed no recurrent DIC and a stable aortic diameter with complete FL thrombosis. This endovascular repair technique that excluding all the tears is a feasible approach to prevents continuous coagulation components consumption and thus to manage DIC effectively.