Genotyping of hepatitis C virus isolates by a new line probe assay using sequence information from both the 5′untranslated and the core regions

Virological surveillance, molecular phylogeny, and evolutionary dynamics of hepatitis C virus subtypes 1a and 4a isolates in patients from Saudi Arabia

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtypes are pre-requisite to predict endemicity, epidemiology, clinical pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. HCV genotypes 4 and 1 are the most prevalent in Saudi Arabia, however; less consensus data exist on circulating HCV subtypes in infected individuals. This study was aimed to demonstrate the virological surveillance, phylogenetic analysis, and evolutionary relationship of HCV genotypes 4 and 1 subtypes in the Saudi population with the rest of the world. Fifty-five clinical specimens from different parts of the country were analyzed based on 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) amplification, direct sequencing, and for molecular evolutionary genetic analysis. Pair-wise comparison and multiple sequence alignment were performed to determine the nucleotide conservation, nucleotide variation, and positional mutations within the sequenced isolates. The evolutionary relationship of sequenced HCV isolates with referenced HCV strains from the rest of the world was established by computing pairwise genetic distances and generating phylogenetic trees. Twelve new sequences were submitted to GenBank, NCBI database. The results revealed that HCV subtype 4a is more prevalent preceded by 1a in the Saudi population. Molecular phylogeny predicts the descendants’ relationship of subtype 4a isolates very close to Egyptian prototype HCV strains, while 1a isolates were homogeneous and clustering to the European and North American genetic lineages. The implications of this study highlight the importance of HCV subtyping as an indispensable tool to monitor the distribution of viral strains, to determine the risk factors of infection prevalence, and to investigate clinical differences of treatment outcomes among intergenotypic and intragenotypic isolates in the treated population.

Comparison of direct sequencing of the NS5B region with the Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay for genotyping of viral isolates in Mexico

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects an estimated 71 million people worldwide. HCV is classified into eight genotypes and >70 subtypes. Determination of HCV genotype is important for selection of type and duration of antiviral therapy, and genotype is also a predictor of treatment response. The most commonly used HCV genotyping method in clinical laboratories is a hybridization-based line probe assay (LiPA; Versant HCV Genotype 2.0). However, these methods have a lack of specificity in genotype identification and subtype assignment. Here, we compared the performance of Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 with the gold standard direct sequencing of the NS5B region, in 97 samples from Mexican patients. We found a genotypic concordance of 63.9% between these methods. While 68 samples (70%) were classified into HCV genotype 1 (GT1) by NS5B sequencing, it was not true for 17 samples (17.5%), which were not match HCV subtype by LiPA. Furthermore, nine of the 33 samples classified by NS5B sequencing as GT1a were not identified by LiPA. Use of direct sequencing could improve selection of the optimal therapy, avoid possible failures of therapy and avoid high costs resulting from incorrect genotyping tests in settings without broad access to pangenotypic regimens.

Profile of the VERSANT HCV genotype 2.0 assay

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is divided into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes. HCV genotype studies reflect the viral transmission patterns as well as human migration routes. In a clinical setting, HCV genotype is a baseline predictor for the sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with peginterferon or some direct acting antivirals (DAAs). The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay has been globally used for HCV genotyping over a decade. Areas covered: The assay is based on reverse hybridization principle. It is evolved from its former versions, and the accuracy and successful genotyping/subtyping rate are substantially improved. It shows an accuracy of 99-100% for genotypes 1-6. It can also reliably identify subtypes 1a and 1b. However, the assay does not allow a high resolution for many other subtypes. Reasons for indeterminate or inaccurate genotyping/subtyping results are discussed. Expert commentary: Genotyping helps to find the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment regimen. The rapid development of anti-HCV treatment regimens, however, is greatly simplifying laboratory tests. In the near future, the need for HCV genotyping and frequent serial on-treatment HCV RNA tests will decrease along with the wide use of the more potent and pan-genotypic DAA regimens.

A reliable multiplex genotyping assay for HCV using a suspension bead array

The genotyping of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) plays an important role in the treatment of HCV because genotype determination has recently been incorporated into the treatment guidelines for HCV infections. Most current genotyping methods are unable to detect mixed genotypes from two or more HCV infections. We therefore developed a multiplex genotyping assay to determine HCV genotypes using a bead array. Synthetic plasmids, genotype panels and standards were used to verify the target-specific primer (TSP) design in the assay, and the results indicated that discrimination efforts using 10 TSPs in a single reaction were extremely successful. Thirty-five specimens were then tested to evaluate the assay performance, and the results were highly consistent with those of direct sequencing, supporting the reliability of the assay. Moreover, the results from samples with mixed HCV genotypes revealed that the method is capable of detecting two different genotypes within a sample. Furthermore, the specificity evaluation results suggested that the assay could correctly identify HCV in HCV/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients. This genotyping platform enables the simultaneous detection and identification of more than one genotype in a same sample and is able to test 96 samples simultaneously. It could therefore provide a rapid, efficient and reliable method of determining HCV genotypes in the future.

Expression of the full-length HCV core subgenome from HCV gentoype-1a and genotype-3a and evaluation of the antigenicity of translational products

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health problem in India. Detection of HCV and its genotypes by simple and economic assays is a prime requirement in the planning of antiviral treatments for patients infected with this virus. Although commercial assays are available for the detection of both HCV RNA and genotypes, efforts aimed at the development of simple and economical systems for these measurements are still going on.

AIM

The present study was designed to clone and express the HCV CORE gene from HCV genotype-1a and genotype-3a and use the peptides to develop immunoassays for the detection of genotype-specific antibodies in sera samples.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-five serum samples from patients with liver and renal diseases were screened for HCV RNA by real-time PCR, followed by HCV genotyping in RNA-positive sera by restriction fragment length polymorphism, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. The HCV CORE gene was amplified from sera carrying HCV genotype-1a and genotype-3a and cloned and expressed in the pET19b vector. The translational products were used to develop a western blot assay for the detection of genotype-specific anti-HCV antibodies.

RESULTS

The HCV CORE gene, from both genotypes, was cloned and expressed successfully, with production of a 26 kDa recombinant protein in either case. Using peptides in a western blot assay, 101 sera samples were tested for the anti-HCV CORE antibody. Each peptide showed a reaction with anti-HCV total antibody without showing any genotype-specific binding. This indicates that individual peptides obtained from different genotypes do not have a genotype-specific epitope to bind with antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Cloning and expression of the HCV CORE gene from genotype-1a and genotype-3a was successful. However, the peptides formed did not show genotype-specific binding with anti-HCV.

Comparison of three different HCV genotyping methods: core, NS5B sequence analysis and line probe assay

To evaluate the capacity of Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 to identify hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes, 110 serum samples were collected from chronic hepatitis C patients. Three methods were compared: core sequence analysis, NS5B sequence analysis and the INNO-LiPA assay. The result showed that 102 (92.7%) of the samples were amplified in either or both regions, of which 97 were amplified in the core region and 62 were amplified in the NS5B region. Correlation analysis showed that amplification rates of subgenomic regions were associated with viral loads. Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) and phylogenetic analysis showed that the 102 samples were classified into 5 categories: subtype 1b, 2a, 3a, 3b and 6a at frequencies of 61.8% (63), 9.8% (10), 3.9% (4), 3.9% (4) and 20.6% (21), respectively. Compared with sequencing methods, 66.7% (68) of the 102 samples were identified completely by LiPA 2.0, whereas 19.6% (20) were assigned incompletely (indistinguishable or not identified subtype) and 13.7% (14) were misclassified. Of 21 genotype 6a samples, 11 were mistyped as 1b. In conclusion, LiPA 2.0 was not suitable for identifying HCV genotypes in the samples tested, whereas core sequence analysis remained an ideal method for genotyping HCV.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 subtype identification in new HCV drug development and future clinical practice

BACKGROUND

With the development of new specific inhibitors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzymes and functions that may yield different antiviral responses and resistance profiles according to the HCV subtype, correct HCV genotype 1 subtype identification is mandatory in clinical trials for stratification and interpretation purposes and will likely become necessary in future clinical practice. The goal of this study was to identify the appropriate molecular tool(s) for accurate HCV genotype 1 subtype determination.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

A large cohort of 500 treatment-naïve patients eligible for HCV drug trials and infected with either subtype 1a or 1b was studied. Methods based on the sole analysis of the 5' non-coding region (5'NCR) by sequence analysis or reverse hybridization failed to correctly identify HCV subtype 1a in 22.8%-29.5% of cases, and HCV subtype 1b in 9.5%-8.7% of cases. Natural polymorphisms at positions 107, 204 and/or 243 were responsible for mis-subtyping with these methods. A real-time PCR method using genotype- and subtype-specific primers and probes located in both the 5'NCR and the NS5B-coding region failed to correctly identify HCV genotype 1 subtype in approximately 10% of cases. The second-generation line probe assay, a reverse hybridization assay that uses probes targeting both the 5'NCR and core-coding region, correctly identified HCV subtypes 1a and 1b in more than 99% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

In the context of new HCV drug development, HCV genotyping methods based on the exclusive analysis of the 5'NCR should be avoided. The second-generation line probe assay is currently the best commercial assay for determination of HCV genotype 1 subtypes 1a and 1b in clinical trials and practice.

High diversity of hepatitis C viral quasispecies is associated with early virological response in patients undergoing antiviral therapy

Differential response patterns to optimal antiviral therapy, peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin, are well documented in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Among many factors that may affect therapeutic efficiency, HCV quasispecies (QS) characteristics have been a major focus of previous studies, yielding conflicting results. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the role of HCV QS in antiviral therapy, we performed the largest-ever HCV QS analysis in 153 patients infected with HCV genotype 1 strains. A total of 4,314 viral clones spanning hypervarible region 1 were produced from these patients during the first 12 weeks of therapy, followed by detailed genetic analyses. Our data show an exponential distribution pattern of intrapatient QS diversity in this study population in which most patients (63%) had small QS diversity with genetic distance (d) less than 0.2. The group of patients with genetic distance located in the decay region (d>0.53) had a significantly higher early virologic response (EVR) rate (89.5%), which contributed substantially to the overall association between EVR and increased baseline QS diversity. In addition, EVR was linked to a clustered evolutionary pattern in terms of QS dynamic changes.

CONCLUSION

EVR is associated with elevated HCV QS diversity and complexity, especially in patients with significantly higher HCV genetic heterogeneity.

Spontaneous viral clearance, viral load, and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV-infected patients with anti-HCV antibodies in Europe

BACKGROUND

Variables influencing serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels and genotype distribution in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are not well known, nor are factors determining spontaneous clearance after exposure to HCV in this population.

METHODS

All HCV antibody (Ab)-positive patients with HIV infection in the EuroSIDA cohort who had stored samples were tested for serum HCV RNA, and HCV genotyping was done for subjects with viremia. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with spontaneous HCV clearance and HCV genotype 1.

RESULTS

Of 1940 HCV Ab-positive patients, 1496 (77%) were serum HCV RNA positive. Injection drug users (IDUs) were less likely to have spontaneously cleared HCV than were homosexual men (20% vs. 39%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.36 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.24-0.53]), whereas patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were more likely to have spontaneously cleared HCV than were those negative for HBsAg (43% vs. 21%; aOR, 2.91 [95% CI, 1.94-4.38]). Of patients with HCV viremia, 786 (53%) carried HCV genotype 1, and 53 (4%), 440 (29%), and 217 (15%) carried HCV genotype 2, 3, and 4, respectively. A greater HCV RNA level was associated with a greater chance of being infected with HCV genotype 1 (aOR, 1.60 per 1 log higher [95% CI, 1.36-1.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

More than three-quarters of the HIV- and HCV Ab-positive patients in EuroSIDA showed active HCV replication. Viremia was more frequent in IDUs and, conversely, was less common in HBsAg-positive patients. Of the patients with HCV viremia analyzed, 53% were found to carry HCV genotype 1, and this genotype was associated with greater serum HCV RNA levels.

Development and evaluation of a sensitive enzyme-linked oligonucleotide-sorbent assay for detection of polymerase chain reaction-amplified hepatitis C virus of genotypes 1-6

A high-throughput polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based enzyme-linked oligonucleotide-sorbent assay (ELOSA) was developed for use in the diagnostic testing of serum from patients who may be infected with different hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. Twelve genotype-specific 5'-aminated DNA-coated probes were designed based on the variable 5'-untranslated region sequences of the HCV genotypes 1-6. Using 100 clinical serum samples, the performance of the PCR-ELOSA method was compared with Roche's COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor V2.0 assay and the VERSANT HCV genotype assay (LiPA), and the overall agreement was 99% at the level of HCV genotypes with a detection range of 2.0 x 10(2) to 1.0 x 10(7)IU/ml for PCR-ELOSA. The PCR-ELOSA was more comprehensive as demonstrated by the fact that approximately 20% of the samples with different subtypes could be discriminated by this method but not by LiPA. In addition, the PCR-ELOSA system showed high accuracy (CV<or=6.36%) and even higher reproducibility (CV<or=5.55%). Thus, this novel PCR-ELOSA system provides a sensitive and versatile alternative to current HCV detection assays.

Towards a better resolution of hepatitis C virus variants: CLIP sequencing of an HCV core fragment and automated assignment of genotypes and subtypes

Commercially available assays for typing of hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates satisfy the current clinical needs. They are, however, limited in their ability to identify the multitude of existing HCV subtypes correctly. Therefore, these kits should only be used cautiously in epidemiological studies and will also not meet future clinical demands which might arise, e.g., from the application of HCV subtype-specific antiviral compounds. In an attempt to overcome the drawbacks of commercial typing procedures based on the analysis of the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR), an approach was developed which relies on CLIP sequencing of an HCV core fragment with automated assignments of types and subtypes via an originally created "core-specific" sequence database. The performance characteristics of the new technique were evaluated in comparison to the Trugene 5' NC Genotyping Kit. The core-based sequencing method could regularly detect HCV isolates of genotypes 1-6 with an analytical sensitivity of 5000 IU/ml. The accuracy of typing results obtained by the Trugene test was 97% (genotypes) and 81% (subtypes). The core-linked approach classified all HCV strains correctly on the level of genotypes and led to an adequate subtype assignment in 96% of all cases. This analytical performance characteristics recorded for the newly devised typing technique was superior to those reported for all commercially available assays, including a most recently released new generation of the line probe assay. Consequently, CLIP sequencing of an HCV core fragment with subsequent automated assignment of types and subtypes can be confidently used in clinical laboratory practice to answer current and also future questions in the context of HCV typing.