Variation in the elective management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms and physician practice patterns

Real-world application of Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection scores in peripheral arterial disease patients

OBJECTIVE

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system aims to risk stratify patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), predicting both amputation rates and the need for revascularization. However, real-world use of the system and whether it predicts outcomes accurately after open revascularization and peripheral interventions is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the adoption of the WIfI classification system within a contemporary statewide collaborative as well as the impact of patient factor, and WIfI risk assessment on short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Using data from a large statewide collaborative, we identified patients with CLTI undergoing open surgical revascularization or peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) between 2016 and 2022. The primary exposure was preoperative clinical WIfI stage. Patients were categorized according to the SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System into clinical WIfI stages 1, 2, 3, or 4. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year amputation and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of WIfI stage on postrevascularization outcomes.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 17,417 patients, 83.4% (n = 14,529) had WIfI stage documented. PVIs were performed on 57.6% of patients, and 42.4% underwent an open surgical revascularization. Of the patients, 49.5% were classified as stage 1, 19.3% stage 2, 12.8% stage 3, and 18.3% of patients met stage 4 criteria. Stage 3 and 4 patients had higher rates of diabetes, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, and were less likely to be current or former smokers. One-half of stage 3 patients underwent open surgical revascularization, whereas stage 1 patients were most likely to have received a PVI (64%). As WIfI stage increased from 1 to 4, 1-year mortality increased from 12% to 21% (P < .001), 30-day amputation rates increased from 5% to 38% (P < .001), and 1-year amputation rates increased from 15% to 55% (P < .001). Finally, patients who did not have WIfI scores classified had significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, as well as higher 30-day and 1-year amputation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVS WIfI clinical stage is significantly associated with 1-year amputation rates in patients with CLTI after lower extremity revascularization. Because nearly 55% of stage 4 patients require a major amputation within 1 year of intervention, this finding study supports use of the WIfI classification system in clinical decision-making for patients with CLTI.

Excess Mortality for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and the Potential of Strict Implementation of Cardiovascular Risk Management: A Multifaceted Study Integrating Meta-Analysis, National Registry, and PHAST and TEDY Trial Data

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies imply a profound residual mortality risk following successful abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA) repair. This excess mortality is generally attributed to increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was (1) to quantify the excess residual mortality for patients with AAA, (2) to evaluate the cross sectional level of cardiovascular risk management, and (3) to estimate the potential of optimised cardiovascular risk management to reduce the excess mortality in these patients.

METHODS

Excess mortality was estimated through a systematic review and meta-analysis, and through data from the Swedish National Health Registry. Cardiovascular risk profiles were individually assessed during eligibility screening of patients with AAA for two multicentre pharmaceutical AAA stabilisation trials. The potential of full implementation of cardiovascular risk management was estimated through the validated Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) risk scores algorithm.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed a similarly impaired survival for patients who received early repair (small AAA) or regular repair (≥ 55 mm), and a further impaired survival for patients under surveillance for a small AAA. Excess mortality was further quantified using Swedish population data. The data revealed a more than quadrupled and doubled five year mortality rate for women and men who had their AAA repaired, respectively. Evaluation of the level of risk management of 358 patients under surveillance in 16 Dutch hospitals showed that the majority of patients with AAA did not meet therapeutic targets set for risk management in high risk populations, and indicated a more pronounced prevention gap in women. Application of the SMART risk score algorithm predicted that optimal implementation of risk management guidelines would reduce the 10 year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events from 43% to 14%.

CONCLUSION

Independent of the rupture risk, AAA is associated with a worryingly compromised life expectancy with a particularly poor prognosis for women. Optimal implementation of cardiovascular risk prevention guidelines is predicted to profoundly reduce cardiovascular risk.

Underutilization of medical management of peripheral artery disease among patients with claudication undergoing lower extremity bypass

OBJECTIVE

First-line treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) involves medical therapy and lifestyle modification. Multiple professional organizations such as the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology make Class I recommendations for medical management including antiplatelet, statin, antihypertensive, and cilostazol medications, as well as lifestyle therapy including exercise and smoking cessation. Although evidence supports up-front medical and lifestyle management prior to surgical intervention, it is unclear how well this occurs in contemporary clinical practice. It is also unclear whether variability in first-line treatment prior to revascularization is associated with postoperative outcomes. This study examined the proportion of patients with claudication actively receiving evidence-based therapy prior to surgery in a statewide surgical registry.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective open lower extremity bypass for claudication from 2012 to 2021 within a statewide surgical quality registry. The primary exposure was optimal medical therapy, defined as an antiplatelet agent, a statin, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (if the patient had hypertension) on the patient's home medication list on admission for surgery, all of which are Class I recommendations. Despite also being Class I recommendations, cilostazol was not included in the primary exposure due to its highly selective use and our inability to capture intolerance and/or contraindications that are common, and lifestyle therapies were not included as they were only recorded at the time of discharge rather than preoperatively. The primary outcomes were mortality, hospital readmission, amputation, wound complication, myocardial infarction (MI), non-patent bypass, and non-independent ambulatory status at 30 days and 1 year after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of receiving optimal vs non-optimal medical therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 3829 patients with claudication underwent bypass surgery during the study period, with a mean age of 64.8 years (standard deviation, 9.8 years); 2690 (70.3%) were males, and 1873 (48.9%) were current smokers. Of the patients, 1822 (47.6%) were on optimal medical therapy prior to surgery. Additionally, at discharge, 66.5% of smokers received referral to smoking cessation therapy, and 54.1% of patients received referral to exercise therapy. In a multivariable logistic regression, compared with patients not on optimal medical therapy, patients on optimal medical therapy prior to surgery had lower 30-day odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.78) and MI (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.76), lower 1-year odds of mortality (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.82), MI (aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74), and lower readmission (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Although medical and lifestyle management is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with PAD, only one-half of patients were on optimal medical therapy prior to surgery. Patients receiving optimal therapy had a lower risk of postoperative mortality, MI, and readmission. This suggests that not only are there significant opportunities to improve clinical utilization of evidence-based treatment of PAD, but that doing so can benefit patients postoperatively.

Opioid use in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing lower extremity bypass

OBJECTIVE

Opioid use is common among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), given that pain is a defining symptom. Unfortunately, long-term opioid use places patients at dramatically increased risk of overdose and death. Although surgical revascularization is extremely effective in alleviating ischemic pain related to PAD, it is unclear whether this practice results in the discontinuation of opioids after surgery. Therefore, we conducted the following study to investigate trends in opioid use before and after surgical bypass in patients with PAD, as well as the risk factors for continued opioid use after surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing open lower extremity bypass for claudication or rest pain between June 1, 2017, and March 31, 2021. Patients were grouped according to whether they reported preoperative opioid use at the time of surgery. The primary outcome was continued opioid use at 30-day follow-up after discharge. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to estimate the association of continued opioid use with patient characteristics, preoperative opioid use, and receiving a postoperative opioid prescription.

RESULTS

Among 3873 patients undergoing surgery, the mean age was 65.7 (10.2) years and 2650 (68.4%) patients were male. There were 913 patients (23.6%) who used opioids preoperatively and hydrocodone was the most common preoperative opioid (583 [63.9%]). At discharge, 2506 patients (64.7%) received a postoperative opioid prescription. Postoperative opioid prescriptions were significantly more common for preoperative opioid users than opioid-naïve patients (813 [89.0%] vs 1693 [57.2%]; P < .001) and were significantly larger in size (24.3 [21.1] pills vs 19.9 [10.5] pills; P < .001). On 30-day follow-up, 522 preoperative opioid users (61.3%) and 616 opioid-naïve patients (28.4%) reported that they were still using opioids (P < .001). Continued opioid use at follow-up was associated with preoperative opioid use (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.70-3.89) and receiving a postoperative opioid prescription (adjusted odds ratio, 10.83; 95% confidence interval, 7.96-15.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with PAD who use opioids preoperatively do not discontinue opioids after lower extremity bypass. Moreover, a significant proportion of previously opioid-naïve patients are still using opioids 1 month after surgery. In both cases, postoperative opioid prescriptions had the strongest association with continued opioid use. These findings underscore the need for improved prescribing practice and increased attentiveness to discontinuation of unnecessary medications after surgery.

Impact of a regional smoking cessation intervention for vascular surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

Tobacco use is common among vascular surgery patients and negatively impacts outcomes and longevity. In the second quarter of 2018, a statewide vascular quality collaborative launched an initiative across its 35 participating hospitals to promote smoking cessation at the time of surgery. This intervention was based on the Vascular Physician Offer and Report (VAPOR) trial and consisted of 3 components: brief physician-delivered advice, referral to telephone-based counseling, and nicotine replacement therapy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the results of this intervention.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing vascular surgery between 2018 and 2020. Procedures included open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, endovascular aneurysm repair, open vascular bypass, open thrombectomy, carotid endarterectomy, and carotid stenting. The primary explanatory variables were receipt of tobacco cessation interventions as documented in the medical record. The primary outcome was tobacco cessation, captured during 30-day and 1-year chart review and/or patient follow-up. A multivariable logistic regression model was calculated to estimate the association of covariates with smoking cessation while adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 13,890 patients underwent surgery during the study period. The mean age was 69.4 ± 10 years; 4687 patients (34%) were female, and 5158 patients (37%) were current smokers. At least one smoking cessation component was delivered to 2245 patients (44% of smokers). The quit rate was 35% among 4671 patients with 30-day follow-up and 43% among 2936 patients with 1-year follow up. On multivariable regression, at 30 days, receiving two intervention components was associated with 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.55) higher odds of quitting. At both time points, smoking cessation was also associated with undergoing an emergent procedure (30-day odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-1.99; 1-year OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.97) and undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (30-day OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.43; 1-year OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11-2.78).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of vascular surgical patients where tobacco use was common, nearly one-half of patients quit smoking 1 year after surgery. Receiving two smoking cessation intervention components was associated with quitting at 30 days. Overall, these results demonstrate encouraging quit rates and identify an opportunity for longer-term intervention to maintain even greater 1-year tobacco cessation.

Fenestrated repair improves perioperative outcomes but lacks a hospital volume association for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have traditionally been treated with an open surgical repair (OSR). During the past decade, fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has emerged as a viable option. Hospital procedural volume to outcome relationship for OSR of complex AAAs has been well established, but the impact of procedural volume on FEVAR outcomes remains undefined. This study investigated the outcomes of OSR and FEVAR for the treatment of complex AAAs and examined the hospital volume-outcome relationship for these procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a statewide vascular surgery registry was queried for all patients between 2012 and 2018 who underwent elective repair of a juxtarenal/pararenal AAA with FEVAR or OSR. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, and new dialysis. Secondary end points included postoperative pneumonia, renal dysfunction (creatine concentration increase of >2 mg/dL from preoperative baseline), major bleeding, early procedural complications, length of stay, and need for reintervention. To evaluate procedural volume-outcomes relationship, hospitals were stratified into low- and high-volume aortic centers based on a FEVAR annual procedural volume. To account for baseline differences, we calculated propensity scores and employed inverse probability of treatment weighting in comparing outcomes between treatment groups.

RESULTS

A total of 589 patients underwent FEVAR (n = 186) or OSR (n = 403) for a complex AAA. After adjustment, OSR was associated with higher rates of 30-day mortality (10.7% vs 2.9%; P < .001) and need for dialysis (11.3% vs 1.8; P < .001). Postoperative pneumonia (6.8% vs 0.3%; P < .001) and need for transfusion (39.4% vs 10.4%; P < .001) were also significantly higher in the OSR cohort. The median length of stay for OSR and FEVAR was 9 days and 3 days, respectively. For those who underwent FEVAR, endoleaks were present in 12.1% of patients at 30 days and 6.1% of patients at 1 year, with the majority being type II. With a median follow-up period of 331 days (229-378 days), 1% of FEVAR patients required a secondary procedure, and there were no FEVAR conversions to an open aortic repair. Hospitals were divided into low- and high-volume aortic centers based on their annual FEVAR volume of complex AAAs. After adjustment, hospital FEVAR procedural volume was not associated with 30-day mortality or myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

FEVAR was associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with OSR for the management of complex AAAs. Procedural FEVAR volume outcome analysis suggests limited differences in 30-day morbidity, although long-term durability warrants further research.

Bleeding and thrombotic outcomes associated with postoperative use of direct oral anticoagulants after open peripheral artery bypass procedures

OBJECTIVE

Widespread adoption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment has resulted in peripheral bypass patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation with DOACs postoperatively. This study was undertaken to evaluate patient outcomes after open peripheral bypass based on anticoagulation treatment.

METHODS

Postoperative treatment and outcomes of patients undergoing peripheral bypass operations between January 2012 and December 2017 from a statewide multicenter quality improvement registry were examined. Surgeons participating in the registry were surveyed on practice patterns regarding DOACs in bypass patients. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for 30-day transfusion outcomes, and multiple linear regression was performed for length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 9682 patients, 7685 patients received no anticoagulation, whereas 1379 received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and 618 received a DOAC postoperatively. Patients receiving anticoagulation compared with no anticoagulation had a higher body mass index and were more likely to have preoperative anemia, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (all P < .001). Compared with patients receiving VKAs, patients receiving DOACs were less likely to have chronic kidney disease (P = .002) and more likely to have atrial fibrillation (P < .001). The shortest length of stay was among patients receiving no anticoagulation (median, 5 days; interquartile range, 3-9 days; P < .001), followed by DOACs (median, 6 days; interquartile range 3-11 days; P < .001) and VKAs (median, 8 days; interquartile range, 5-13 days; P < .001). Compared with patients receiving VKAs postoperatively, there was no difference in readmission for anticoagulation complications, bypass thrombectomy or thrombolysis, major amputation, or graft patency at 1 year among patients receiving DOACs. On multivariate logistic regression, patients receiving a DOAC (odds ratio, 0.743; confidence interval, 0.59-0.94; P = .011) or no anticoagulation (odds ratio, 0.792; confidence interval, 0.69-0.91; P = .001) were less likely to require transfusion within 30 days than patients taking VKAs. Approximately 70% of the surveyed surgeons reported that they "sometimes" or "always" use DOACs instead of VKAs for protection of a high-risk bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing lower extremity surgical bypass, those receiving a DOAC postoperatively had a shorter length of stay and were less likely to receive a transfusion in 30 days without compromising graft patency and readmission for anticoagulation complications, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis or affecting amputation rate compared with those receiving a VKA. A majority of surgeons within the quality collaborative have adopted the use of DOACs after peripheral bypass, suggesting the need for a prospective trial evaluating DOAC safety and efficacy in patients requiring anticoagulation for high-risk bypass grafts.

Hybrid repair of an adult with a double aortic arch, coarctation of the aorta, and left subclavian artery aneurysm

We report the repair of a double aortic arch, coarctation of the aorta, and left subclavian artery (LSCA) aneurysm using a hybrid procedure in a 47-year-old woman. The patient underwent repair through a median sternotomy incision to bypass the left common carotid artery and LSCA. An endovascular approach was used to repair the coarctation of the aorta and to occlude the right aortic arch. Repair of this anomaly was advised because of worsening clinical symptoms and potential for fatal rupture or dissection of the LSCA aneurysm. Hybrid repair simplified what would have required a multistage open repair.