Challenges and controversies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a clinician's perspective

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Worldwide, about two million people are diagnosed with lung cancer each year, 85% of whom have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent progress in treating advanced/metastatic NSCLC with targeted therapies has shifted attention to early NSCLC (Stages I-IIIA) and perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) systemic therapies. However, our comprehension of how targeted therapeutics are incorporated into care and their impact on patient outcomes is just starting to unfold.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used a US nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database spanning January 2019-March 2024 and aimed to describe (1) eNSCLC patient demographic and clinical characteristics, (2) real-world neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, and (3) patient outcomes.

RESULTS

The study population included 4841 Stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients with a mean age of 70.9 ± 8.6 years. The majority (69.9%) received definitive treatment: surgery (n = 2280), definitive radiation (n = 320), or definitive chemoradiation (n = 783), while 30.1% (n = 1458) did not. Many definitive treatment patients received some perioperative systemic therapy (surgery: 52.6%, radiation: 52.2%, chemoradiation: 75.5%). Neoadjuvant use was limited in all groups (surgery: 8.2%, radiation: 6.1%, chemoradiation: 11.6%). Among the 54.6% receiving adjuvant, immune checkpoint inhibitors were the most common choice for definitive radiation (39.1%) and chemoradiation (73.7%) patients, while surgical patients predominantly received platinum-doublet therapy (37.0%). Surgical patient outcomes were similar across all groups, while definitive chemoradiation or radiation patients without systemic therapy had lower survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that although the majority of patients underwent some form of definitive treatment, adjuvant use was limited, and neoadjuvant use was rarely included in care. A crucial initial step in improving patient outcomes is to understand and address the underutilization of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy for eNSCLC patients.

The Imidazacridine Derivative LPSF/AC-05 Induces Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Arrest, and Topoisomerase II Inhibition in Breast Cancer, Leukemia, and Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current treatments for both solid and hematological tumors are associated with severe adverse effects and drug resistance, necessitating the development of novel selective antineoplastic drugs.

METHODS

The present study describes the antitumor activity of the imidazacridine derivative 5- acridin-9-ylmethylidene-2-thioxoimidazolidin-4-one (LPSF/AC05) in breast cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma cells. Cytotoxicity assays were performed in PBMC and in breast cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma cell lines using the MTT method. Changes in cell cycle progression and apoptosis were assessed using flow cytometry. Moreover, topoisomerase II inhibition assays were performed. LPSF/AC05 exhibited cytotoxicity in six of the nine cell lines tested.

RESULTS

The best results for leukemia and lymphoma were observed in the Toledo, Jurkat, and Raji cell lines (IC50 = 27.18, 31.04, and 33.36 µM, respectively). For breast cancer, the best results were observed in the triple-negative cell line MDA-MB-231 (IC50 = 27.54 μM). The compound showed good selectivity, with no toxicity to normal human cells (IC50 > 100µM; selectivity index > 3). Cell death was primarily induced by apoptosis in all cell lines. Furthermore, LPSF/AC05 treatment induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase in leukemia/lymphoma and at the G2/M phase in breast cancer. Finally, topoisomerase II was inhibited.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate the potential application of LPSF/AC05 in cancer therapy.

The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: outstanding contribution and entering a new phase

The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group (LCSSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) was organized in 1986 and initially included 26 collaborative institutions, which has increased to 52 institutions currently. JCOG-LCSSG includes thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and radiotherapists. In the early period, the JCOG-LCSSG mainly focused on combined modality therapies for lung cancer. Since the 2000s, the JCOG-LCSSG has investigated adequate modes of surgical resection for small-sized and peripheral non-small cell lung cancer and based on the radiological findings of whole tumor size and ground-glass opacity. Trials, such as JCOG0802, JCOG0804, and JCOG1211, have shown the appropriateness of sublobar resection, which has significantly influenced routine clinical practice. With the introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, treatment strategies for lung cancer have changed significantly. Additionally, with the increasing aging population and medical costs, tailored medicine is strongly recommended to address medical issues. To ensure comprehensive treatment, strategies, including surgical and nonsurgical approaches, should be developed. Currently, the JCOG-LCSSG has conducted numerous clinical trials to adjust the diversity of lung cancer treatment strategies. This review highlights recent advancements in the surgical field, current status, and future direction of the JCOG-LCSSG.

Biosynthesis of pH-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles from Cucumber Peels for Targeting 3D Lung Tumor Spheroids

Lung adenocarcinoma is considered to be one of the primary causes of cancer-related deaths globally. Conventional treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy taken together, have not significantly lowered mortality rates. Repositioning of authorized anticancer medications supported by nanotechnology has therefore emerged as an effective strategy to close such gaps. In this context, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were biosynthesized from cucumber peels and were loaded with doxorubicin, a common anticancer drug to form doxorubicin-bound mesoporous silica nanoparticles (DMSNs). The study addresses a sustainable method for turning waste materials into MSNs, which can be used to create multifunctional nanosystems. The therapeutic module (DMSNs) was designed specifically to target 2D monolayer cells and 3D tumor spheroids of lung adenocarcinoma cancer. The DMSNs demonstrated notable antiproliferative activity and effective intracellular localization in addition to being biocompatible and innately fluorescent. Subsequent investigations revealed significant antibacterial activity against Staphylococcal infection, which is primarily prevalent in lung cancer patients. Thus, the developed MSNs held promising potential for anticancer drug delivery systems and have antibacterial potential to treat bacterial infections in patients with lung cancer. Furthermore, the cucumber peel-mediated synthesis of MSNs could also aid in the management of food waste and promote the adoption of the waste-to-health paradigm for sustainable solutions.

Predictive and prognostic factors in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged early-stage lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive and prognostic factors in clinical stage I, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma following radical surgery. Additionally, it sought to compare these factors with an external cohort of ALK wild-type patients.

METHODS

A multicentric, retrospective, case-control analysis was conducted on patients with clinical T1-2 N0 ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma who underwent anatomical resection and radical lymphadenectomy. Data were collected from 5 high-volume oncological centres. An external cohort of ALK wild-type patients was also analysed for comparison. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to December 2022, 63 patients with ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma were included. High-grade tumours (G3) significantly associated with upstaging (odds ratio = 3.904, P = 0.04). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were significantly improved in upstaged patients receiving adjuvant treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.18, P = 0.0042; HR = 0.24, P = 0.0004, respectively]. The solid or micropapillary histological subtypes were independently associated with worse DFS (HR = 3.41, P = 0.022). Comparison with 435 ALK wild-type patients showed worse DFS in the ALK-rearranged group (HR = 2.09, P = 0.0003). ALK-rearranged patients had higher rates of nodal upstaging, systemic and brain recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical T1-2 N0 ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease with a specific tropism for lymph nodes and the brain. High-grade tumours are predictive of nodal upstaging. Adjuvant treatment significantly improves DFS and overall survival in upstaged patients, highlighting the need for personalized preoperative staging and post-surgical management in this cohort.

Nose-on-Chip Nanobiosensors for Early Detection of Lung Cancer Breath Biomarkers

Lung cancer remains a global health concern, demanding the development of noninvasive, prompt, selective, and point-of-care diagnostic tools. Correspondingly, breath analysis using nanobiosensors has emerged as a promising noninvasive nose-on-chip technique for the early detection of lung cancer through monitoring diversified biomarkers such as volatile organic compounds/gases in exhaled breath. This comprehensive review summarizes the state-of-the-art breath-based lung cancer diagnosis employing chemiresistive-module nanobiosensors supported by theoretical findings. It unveils the fundamental mechanisms and biological basis of breath biomarker generation associated with lung cancer, technological advancements, and clinical implementation of nanobiosensor-based breath analysis. It explores the merits, challenges, and potential alternate solutions in implementing these nanobiosensors in clinical settings, including standardization, biocompatibility/toxicity analysis, green and sustainable technologies, life-cycle assessment, and scheming regulatory modalities. It highlights nanobiosensors' role in facilitating precise, real-time, and on-site detection of lung cancer through breath analysis, leading to improved patient outcomes, enhanced clinical management, and remote personalized monitoring. Additionally, integrating these biosensors with artificial intelligence, machine learning, Internet-of-things, bioinformatics, and omics technologies is discussed, providing insights into the prospects of intelligent nose-on-chip lung cancer sniffing nanobiosensors. Overall, this review consolidates knowledge on breathomic biosensor-based lung cancer screening, shedding light on its significance and potential applications in advancing state-of-the-art medical diagnostics to reduce the burden on hospitals and save human lives.

Advances in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions

The leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide is attributed to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), necessitating a continual focus on improving the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. In this review, the latest breakthroughs and emerging trends in managing NSCLC are highlighted. Major advancements in diagnostic methods, including better imaging technologies and the utilization of molecular biomarkers, are discussed. These advancements have greatly enhanced early detection and personalized treatment plans. Significant improvements in patient outcomes have been achieved by new targeted therapies and immunotherapies, providing new hope for individuals with advanced NSCLC. This review discusses the persistent challenges in accessing advanced treatments and their associated costs despite recent progress. Promising research into new therapies, such as CAR-T cell therapy and oncolytic viruses, which could further revolutionize NSCLC treatment, is also highlighted. This review aims to inform and inspire continued efforts to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients globally, by offering a comprehensive overview of the current state of NSCLC treatment and future possibilities.

Disparity of the Treatment of Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Regarding Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study investigates disparities in chemotherapy treatment for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between urban and rural populations. Despite advancements in NSCLC treatments enhancing survival, significant inequities persist, notably in rural areas where access to care is often limited, resulting in poorer outcomes. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed data from selected studies that compare chemotherapy access and usage between these populations from 2010 to 2024. Our findings indicate that rural patients are consistently less likely to receive advanced chemotherapy treatments than urban counterparts, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.00), suggesting a marginal but noticeable disparity. This highlights a crucial gap in healthcare provision, underscoring the need for policy interventions and improved healthcare practices to ensure equitable treatment access. This research calls for further investigation into socioeconomic and cultural factors contributing to these disparities to inform targeted improvement strategies.

New systemic treatment paradigms in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and variations in patient access across Europe

The treatment landscape of resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is set to change significantly due to encouraging results from randomized trials evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy, as well as adjuvant targeted therapy. As of January 2024, marketing authorization has been granted for four new indications in Europe, and regulatory approvals for other study regimens are expected. Because cost-effectiveness and reimbursement criteria for novel treatments often differ between European countries, access to emerging developments may lead to inequalities due to variations in recommended and available lung cancer care throughout Europe. This Series paper (i) highlights the clinical studies reshaping the treatment landscape in resectable early-stage NSCLC, (ii) compares and contrasts approaches taken by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for drug approval to that taken by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and (iii) evaluates the differences in access to emerging treatments from an availability perspective across European countries.

Developments in predictive biomarker testing and targeted therapy in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer and their application across European countries

In the past two decades, the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has undergone significant changes due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. These advancements have led to the need for predictive molecular tests to identify patients eligible for targeted therapy. This review provides an overview of the development and current application of targeted therapies and predictive biomarker testing in European patients with advanced stage NSCLC. Using data from eleven European countries, we conclude that recommendations for predictive testing are incorporated in national guidelines across Europe, although there are differences in their comprehensiveness. Moreover, the availability of recently EMA-approved targeted therapies varies between European countries. Unfortunately, routine assessment of national/regional molecular testing rates is limited. As a result, it remains uncertain which proportion of patients with metastatic NSCLC in Europe receive adequate predictive biomarker testing. Lastly, Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) for discussion of molecular test results are widely implemented, but national guidelines for their composition and functioning are lacking. The establishment of MTB guidelines can provide a framework for interpreting rare or complex mutations, facilitating appropriate treatment decision-making, and ensuring quality control.

Future perspective for the application of predictive biomarker testing in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

For patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment strategies have changed significantly due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. In the last few years, we have seen an explosive growth of newly introduced targeted therapies in oncology and this development is expected to continue in the future. Besides primary targetable aberrations, emerging diagnostic biomarkers also include relevant co-occurring mutations and resistance mechanisms involved in disease progression, that have impact on optimal treatment management. To accommodate testing of pending biomarkers, it is necessary to establish routine large-panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for all patients with advanced stage NSCLC. For cost-effectiveness and accessibility, it is recommended to implement predictive molecular testing using large-panel NGS in a dedicated, centralized expert laboratory within a regional oncology network. The central molecular testing center should host a regional Molecular Tumor Board and function as a hub for interpretation of rare and complex testing results and clinical decision-making.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening program in the netherlands: a simulation based on NELSON and NLST study outcomes

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, accounting for more than 10,000 annual deaths. Lung cancer screening (LCS) studies using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) have demonstrated that early detection reduces lung cancer mortality. However, no LCS program has been implemented yet in the Netherlands. A national LCS program has the potential to enhance the health outcomes for lung cancer patients in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of LCS compared to no-screening in the Netherlands, by simulating the screening outcomes based on data from NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings ONderzoek (NELSON) and National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). We simulated annual screening up to 74 years of age, using inclusion criteria from the respective studies. A decision tree and Markov model was used to predict the incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) for the screening population. The analysis used a lifetime horizon and a societal perspective.

RESULTS

Compared to no-screening, LCS resulted in an ICER of €5,169 per QALY for the NELSON simulation, and an ICER of €17,119 per QALY for the NLST simulation. The screening costs were highly impactful for the cost-effectiveness. The most influential parameter was the CT scan cost. Cost reduction for CT from €201 to €101 per scan would reduce the ICER to €2,335 using NELSON criteria. Additionally, LCS could prevent 15,115 and 12,611 premature lung cancer deaths, accompanied by 1.66 and 1.31 QALYs gained per lung cancer case for the NELSON and NLST simulations, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LCS was estimated to be cost-effective in the Netherlands for both simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY. Using the NELSON criteria, less than €5,500 per QALY had to be spent. Lowering the cost per CT exam would lead to a further reduction of this amount.