Outcome of AML patients with IDH2 mutations in real world before the era of IDH2 inhibitors

TMT-based comprehensive proteomic profiling identifies serum prognostic signatures of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is classified into favorable-risk, intermediate-risk, and poor-risk subtypes. This study aimed to compare the serum proteomic signatures of the three AML subtypes and identify prognostic biomarkers for AML. Serum samples from patients with favorable-risk (n = 14), intermediate-risk (n = 19), and poor-risk AMLs (n = 18) were used for the analysis of tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling-based quantitative proteomics. Comparative analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between groups. Prognostic proteins were screened using binary logistics regression analysis. TMT-MS/MS proteomics analysis identified 138 DEPs. Fumarate hydratase (FH), isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2), and enolase 1 (ENO1) were significantly upregulated in poor-risk patients compared with favorable-risk patients. ELISA assay confirmed that patients with poor-risk AMLs had higher levels of IDH2, ENO1, and FH compared with intermediate-risk AML patients. Logistics analysis identified that proteins 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 (HADH, odds ratio (OR) = 1.035, p = 0.010), glutamine synthetase (GLUL, OR = 1.022, p = 0.039), and lactotransferrin (LTF, OR = 1.1224, p = 0.016) were associated with poor prognosis, and proteins ENO1 (OR = 1.154, p = 0.053), FH (OR = 1.043, p = 0.059), and IDH2 (OR = 3.350, p = 0.055) were associated with AML prognosis. This study showed that AML patients had elevated levels of FH, IDH2, ENO1, LTF, and GLUL proteins and might be at high risk of poor prognosis.

Reductive TCA cycle catalyzed by wild-type IDH2 promotes acute myeloid leukemia and is a metabolic vulnerability for potential targeted therapy

Background

Isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) is a mitochondrial enzyme that catalyzes the metabolic conversion between isocitrate and alpha-ketoglutarate (α-KG) in the TCA cycle. IDH2 mutation is an oncogenic event in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) due to the generation of 2-hydroxyglutarate. However, the role of wild-type IDH2 in AML remains unknown, despite patients with it suffer worse clinical outcome than those harboring mutant type.

Methods

IDH2 expression in AML cell lines and patient samples was evaluated by RT-qPCR, western blotting and database analyses. The role of wild-type IDH2 in AML cell survival and proliferation was tested using genetic knockdown and pharmacological inhibition in AML cells and animal models. LC–MS, GC–MS, isotope metabolic tracing, and molecular analyses were performed to reveal the underlying mechanisms.

Results

We found that wild-type IDH2 was overexpressed in AML and played a major role in promoting leukemia cell survival and proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Metabolomic analyses revealed an active IDH2-mediated reductive TCA cycle that promoted the conversion of α-KG to isocitrate/citrate to facilitate glutamine utilization for lipid synthesis in AML cells. Suppression of wild-type IDH2 by shRNA resulted in elevated α-KG and decreased isocitrate/citrate, leading to reduced lipid synthesis, a significant decrease in c-Myc downregulated by α-KG, and an inhibition of AML viability and proliferation. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of IDH2 showed significant therapeutic effect in mice inoculated with AML cells with wt-IDH2 and induced a downregulation of C-MYC in vivo.

Conclusions

Wt-IDH2 is an essential molecule for AML cell survival and proliferation by promoting conversion of α-KG to isocitrate for lipid synthesis and by upregulating c-Myc expression and could be a potential therapeutic target in AML.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-022-01245-z.

A Genome-Wide Profiling of Glioma Patients with an IDH1 Mutation Using the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer Database

Simple Summary

Glioma patients that present a somatic mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene have a significantly better prognosis and overall survival than patients with the wild-type genotype. An IDH1 mutation is hypothesized to occur early during cellular transformation and leads to further genetic instability. A genome-wide profiling of glioma patients in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database was performed to classify the genetic differences in IDH1-mutant versus IDH1-wildtype patients. This classification will aid in a better understanding of how this specific mutation influences the genetic make-up of glioma and the resulting prognosis. Key differences in co-mutation and gene expression levels were identified that correlate with an improved prognosis.

Abstract

Gliomas are differentiated into two major disease subtypes, astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma, which are then characterized as either IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase)-wild type or IDH-mutant due to the dramatic differences in prognosis and overall survival. Here, we investigated the genetic background of IDH1-mutant gliomas using the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database. In astrocytoma patients, we found that IDH1 is often co-mutated with TP53, ATRX, AMBRA1, PREX1, and NOTCH1, but not CHEK2, EGFR, PTEN, or the zinc finger transcription factor ZNF429. The majority of the mutations observed in these genes were further confirmed to be either drivers or pathogenic by the Cancer-Related Analysis of Variants Toolkit (CRAVAT). Gene expression analysis showed down-regulation of DRG2 and MSN expression, both of which promote cell proliferation and invasion. There was also significant over-expression of genes such as NDRG3 and KCNB1 in IDH1-mutant astrocytoma patients. We conclude that IDH1-mutant glioma is characterized by significant genetic changes that could contribute to a better prognosis in glioma patients.

Improved survival with enasidenib versus standard of care in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia associated with IDH2 mutations using historical data and propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluated the relative survival benefits associated with enasidenib and current standard of care (SoC) therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared survival outcomes observed with enasidenib 100 mg daily in the phase I/II AG221-C-001 trial and SoC outcomes obtained from a real-world chart review of patients in France.

RESULTS

Before matching, enasidenib (n = 195) was associated with numerically improved overall survival (OS) relative to SoC (n = 80; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11). After matching and adjusting for covariates (n = 78 per group), mortality risk was significantly lower with enasidenib than with SoC (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97). The median OS was 9.26 months for enasidenib (95% CI, 7.72-13.24) and 4.76 months for SoC (95% CI, 3.81-8.21). Results remained robust across all sensitivity analyses conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

PSM analyses indicate that enasidenib significantly prolongs survival relative to SoC among patients with R/R AML and an IDH2 mutation who are ineligible for HSCT. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings using other data sources and to assess the comparative efficacy of enasidenib for other treatment outcomes.

Searching for a signature involving 10 genes to predict the survival of patients with acute myelocytic leukemia through a combined multi-omics analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) still has a poor prognosis. As a result, gene markers for predicting AML prognosis must be identified through systemic analysis of multi-omics data.

METHODS

First of all, the copy number variation (CNV), mutation, RNA-Seq, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, as well as those clinical follow-up data, were obtained based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Thereafter, all samples (n = 229) were randomized as test set and training set, respectively. Of them, the training set was used to screen for genes related to prognosis, and genes with mutation, SNP or CNV. Then, shrinkage estimate was used for feature selection of all the as-screened genes, to select those stable biomarkers. Eventually, a prognosis model related to those genes was established, and validated within the GEO verification (n = 124 and 72) and test set (n = 127). Moreover, it was compared with the AML prognosis prediction model reported in literature.

RESULTS

Altogether 832 genes related to prognosis, 23 related to copy amplification, 774 associated with copy deletion, and 189 with significant genomic variations were acquired in this study. Later, genes with genomic variations and those related to prognosis were integrated to obtain 38 candidate genes; eventually, a shrinkage estimate was adopted to obtain 10 feature genes (including FAT2, CAMK2A, TCERG1, GDF9, PTGIS, DOC2B, DNTTIP1, PREX1, CRISPLD1 and C22orf42). Further, a signature was established using these 10 genes based on Cox regression analysis, and it served as an independent factor to predict AML prognosis. More importantly, it was able to stratify those external verification, test and training set samples with regard to the risk (P < 0.01). Compared with the prognosis prediction model reported in literature, the model established in this study was advantageous in terms of the prediction performance.

CONCLUSION

The signature based on 10 genes had been established in this study, which is promising to be used to be a new marker for predicting AML prognosis.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a key enzyme involved in the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. IDH mutation produces a neomorphic enzyme, which can lead to the abnormal accumulation of R-2-HG and promotes leukemogenesis. IDH mutation occurs in 20% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, mainly including IDH1 R132, IDH2 R140, and IDH2 R172. Different mutant isoforms have different prognostic values. In recent years, IDH inhibitors have shown good clinical response in AML patients. Hence, enasidenib and ivosidenib, the IDH2 and IDH1 inhibitors developed by Agios Pharmaceuticals, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration on 1 August 2017 and 20 July 2018 for the treatment of adult relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML with IDH2 and IDH1 mutations, respectively. IDH inhibitor monotherapy for R/R AML is efficacious and safe; however, there are problems, such as primary or acquired resistance. Clinical trials of IDH inhibitors combined with hypomethylating agents or standard chemotherapy for the treatment of R/R AML or newly diagnosed AML, as well as in post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as maintenance therapy, are ongoing. This article summarizes the use of IDH inhibitors in AML with IDH mutations.