Surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and evidence summary

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a malignant tumor originating from the pleura, and its incidence has been increasing in recent years. Due to the insidious onset and strong local invasiveness of MPM, most patients are diagnosed in the late stage and early screening and treatment for high-risk populations are crucial. The treatment of MPM mainly includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Immunotherapy and electric field therapy have also been applied, leading to further improvements in patient survival. The Mesothelioma Group of the Yangtze River Delta Lung Cancer Cooperation Group (East China LUng caNcer Group, ECLUNG; Youth Committee) developed a national consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MPM based on existing clinical research evidence and the opinions of national experts. This consensus aims to promote the homogenization and standardization of MPM diagnosis and treatment in China, covering epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

An Investigation of Cancer-Directed Surgery for Different Histologic Subtypes of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

The role of cancer-directed surgery in the treatment of stage I-IIIA malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) by histologic subtypes remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival of the different histologic subtypes for stage I-IIIA MPM stratified by cancer-directed surgery and nonoperative management.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How is the histologic subtype of MPM, clinical stage of MPM, and use of cancer-directed surgery for MPM associated with overall survival?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Overall survival of patients with stage I-IIIA epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic MPM in the National Cancer Database from 2004 through 2017 who underwent cancer-directed surgery (ie, surgery with or without chemotherapy or radiation) or chemotherapy with or without radiation (nonoperative management) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, and propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2,285 patients with stage I-IIIA MPM who met inclusion criteria, histologic subtype was epithelioid in 71% of patients, sarcomatoid in 12% of patients, and biphasic in 17% of patients. Median survival was 20 months in the epithelioid group, 8 months in the sarcomatoid group, and 13 months in the biphasic group (P < .01). Among patients who underwent surgery, median survival was 25 months in the epithelioid group, 8 months in the sarcomatoid group, and 15 months in the biphasic group (P < .01). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses, surgery was associated with improved survival in the epithelioid group (P < .01) but not in the sarcomatoid (P = .63) or biphasic (P = .21) groups. These findings were consistent in propensity score-matched analyses for each MPM histologic type.

INTERPRETATION

In this national analysis, cancer-directed surgery was found to be associated with improved survival for stage I-IIIA epithelioid MPM, but not for biphasic or sarcomatoid MPM.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Minimization Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Background

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is rare and aggressive neoplasia, with a poor prognosis; furthermore, the monetary cost of its treatment represents a major challenge for many patients. The economic burden this malignancy imposes is underscored by the fact that asbestos exposure, which is the most frequent risk factor, is much more prevalent in the lower socioeconomic population of developing countries. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of continuous infusion of low-dose Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (CIGC) as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable MPM.

Methods

We performed a prospective cohort study to determine efficacy and safety of continuous infusion gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in a 6-h continuous infusion plus cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with unresectable MPM. We also performed a cost-minimization analysis to determine if this chemotherapy regimen is less expensive than other currently used regimens.

Results

The median number of chemotherapy cycles was six (range 1–11 cycles); objective response rate was documented in 46.2%, and disease control rate was seen in 81.2%. Median PFS was 8.05 months (CI 95% 6.97–9.13); median OS was 16.16 months (CI 95% 12.5–19.9). The cost minimization analysis revealed savings of 66.4, 61.9, and 97.7% comparing CIGC with short-infusion gemcitabine plus cisplatin (SIGC), cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP), and cisplatin plus pemetrexed and bevacizumab (CPB), respectively. Furthermore, this chemotherapy regimen proved to be safe at the administered dosage.

Conclusion

CIGC is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with unresectable MPM; besides, this combination is a cost-saving option when compared with other frequently used chemotherapy schemes. Therefore, this treatment scheme should be strongly considered for patients with unresectable MPM and limited economic resources.

Emerging therapies in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer of the pleural surfaces frequently related to asbestos exposure. It is characterized by a poor prognosis even for patients treated with trimodality therapy, including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Moreover, the majority of patients are not candidates for surgery due to disease advanced stage or medical comorbidities. For these patients, the survival rate is even lower and few therapeutic options are currently available. Nevertheless, many interesting novel approaches are under investigation, among which immunotherapy represents one of the most promising emerging strategies. In this review, we will discuss the role of new therapeutic options, particularly immunotherapy, and present the results of the most important and promising clinical trials.

Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Chemotherapy treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a difficult history

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm that typically arises from mesothelial surfaces of the pleural cavity. Despite treatment improvements, it carries a dismal prognosis. The majority of patients either have unresectable disease or are not candidates for surgery due to medical comorbidities or old age. For such patients, chemotherapy (CT) represents the gold-standard treatment. To date, combination CT with cisplatin plus pemetrexed represents the most widely used regimen in first-line setting for patients with unresectable MPM. Other first-line options are currently available, including the use of raltitrexed instead of pemetrexed combined with platinum. In this review, we discuss the role of CT in MPM mainly focusing on the results of the trials conducted in first-line setting.

Effect of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy on the malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgery-based multimodality therapies have been used to control the malignant effusion and its recurrence in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been used in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, but the results were controversial. The aim of the current study was, therefore, to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of HITHOC on MPM therapy. After thorough searching of online databases, total 21 articles were included into qualitative systematic review and 5 of them were used to conduct qualitative meta-analysis. It was found that most of HITHOC was used in combination of surgical resection including extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication. Patients who received HITHOC had significantly longer median survival length compared to the patients without HITHOC (Hedges's g = 0.384 ± 0.105, 95% CI: 0.178∼0.591, P < 0.001). In addition, HITHOC as palliative therapy was favored (Hedges's g = 0.591 ± 0.201, 95% CI: 0.196∼0.967, P < 0.001) in terms of recurrence free interval. The findings of the current study suggested that HITHOC is one of the safe and effective therapies in prolonging patients' median survival time and extending recurrence free interval.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update on investigation, diagnosis and treatment

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy of the pleural surface, predominantly caused by prior asbestos exposure. There is a global epidemic of malignant pleural mesothelioma underway, and incidence rates are predicted to peak in the next few years.This article summarises the epidemiology and pathogenesis of malignant pleural mesothelioma, before describing some key factors in the patient experience and outlining common symptoms. Diagnostic approaches are reviewed, including imaging techniques and the role of various biomarkers. Treatment options are summarised, including the importance of palliative care and methods of controlling pleural effusions. The evidence for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery is reviewed, both in the palliative setting and in the context of trimodality treatment. An algorithm for managing malignant pleural effusion in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients is presented. Finally new treatment developments and novel therapeutic approaches are summarised.

Impact of mesothelioma histologic subtype on outcomes in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to determine how malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) histology was associated with the use of surgery and survival.

METHODS

Overall survival of patients with stage I-III epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic MPM in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004-2010 was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 1183 patients who met inclusion criteria, histologic subtype was epithelioid in 811 patients (69%), biphasic in 148 patients (12%), and sarcomatoid in 224 patients (19%). Median survival was 14 mo in the epithelioid group, 10 mo in the biphasic group, and 4 mo in the sarcomatoid group (P < 0.01). Cancer-directed surgery was used more often in patients with epithelioid (37%, 299/811) and biphasic (44%, 65/148) histologies as compared with patients with sarcomatoid histology (26%, 58/224; P < 0.01). Among patients who underwent surgery, median survival was 19 mo in the epithelioid group, 12 mo in the biphasic group, and 4 mo in the sarcomatoid group (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, surgery was associated with improved survival in the epithelioid group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; P < 0.01) but not in biphasic (HR 0.73; P = 0.19) or sarcomatoid (HR 0.79; P = 0.18) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer-directed surgery is associated with significantly improved survival for MPM patients with epithelioid histology, but patients with sarcomatoid and biphasic histologies have poor prognoses that may not be favored by operative treatment. The specific histology should be identified before treatment, so that surgery can be offered to patients with epithelioid histology, as these patients are most likely to benefit.

Novel induction therapies for pleural mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is becoming increasingly common, and rates of diagnosis are expected to continue to increase in the coming years because of the extensive use of asbestos in industrialized countries and the long time interval between exposure and onset of disease. Although much research has been done on the optimal treatment for this disease, the overall prognosis remains grim. The main components of therapy are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but there is controversy in the literature about the optimal inclusion and sequencing of these treatments, as each has unique risk profiles. We have developed a new Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy protocol consisting of induction-accelerated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy. The rationale behind this protocol is to maximize both the tumoricidal and immunogenic potential of the radiotherapy while minimizing the radiation toxicity to the ipsilateral lung. Our initial trial demonstrated the feasibility of this approach and has shown encouraging results in patients with epithelial histology. In this article, we reviewed the current literature on induction chemotherapy for mesothelioma as well as described the Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy protocol and upcoming studies of novel induction therapies for mesothelioma.

A microfluidic platform for chemoresistive testing of multicellular pleural cancer spheroids

This study reports on a microfluidic platform on which single multicellular spheroids from malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, can be loaded, trapped and tested for chemotherapeutic drug response. A new method to detect the spheroid viability cultured on the microfluidic chip as a function of the drug concentration is presented. This approach is based on the evaluation of the caspase activity in the supernatant sampled from the chip and tested using a microplate reader. This simple and time-saving method does only require a minimum amount of manipulations and was established for very low numbers of cells. This feature is particularly important in view of personalised medicine applications for which the number of cells obtained from the patients is low. MPM spheroids were continuously perfused for 48 hours with cisplatin, one of the standard chemotherapeutic drugs used to treat MPM. The 50% growth inhibitory concentration of cisplatin in perfused MPM spheroids was found to be twice as high as in spheroids cultured under static conditions. This chemoresistance increase might be due to the continuous support of nutrients and oxygen to the perfused spheroids.

Surgery in mesothelioma--where do we go after MARS?

The role of surgery in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma remains controversial. Surgical resection consists of different procedures for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons. The latter includes either an extrapleural pleuropneumonectomy (EPP) or lung-sparing operations like debulking of the parietal and visceral pleura by pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) or extended pleurectomy/decortication, in which further debulking of the diaphragm or pericardium is included. Because of the modest outcome of surgery as single-modality therapy, combinations of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy were initiated as a new treatment strategy to improve prognosis. The observations that patients treated with P/D had an equal to better outcome than those treated with EPP, and that EPP with perioperative chemotherapy was better than EPP alone, raises the issue whether performing a P/D with perioperative chemotherapy would result in a further improvement of outcome with a lower operative mortality than with EPP and perioperative chemotherapy. This is the rationale for the next European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial exploring the feasibility of P/D with perioperative chemotherapy.

Malignant pleural effusions: a review

Malignant pleural effusions are a cause of significant symptoms and distress in patients with end-stage malignancies and portend a poor prognosis. Management is aimed at symptom relief, with minimally invasive interventions and minimal requirement for hospital length of stay. The management options include watchful waiting if no symptoms are present, repeat thoracentesis, medical or surgical thoracoscopic techniques to achieve pleurodesis, pleuroperitoneal shunts, placement of tunneled pleural catheters, or a combination of modalities. To determine the best modality for management, patients must be assessed individually with concern for symptoms, functional status, prognosis, and their social and financial situations.

Methotrexate and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor of serosal surfaces with a poor prognosis. Methotrexate and gemcitabine have exhibited single-agent activity in MPM. We evaluated the feasibility of sequential administration of these agents in the treatment of MPM. A total of 21 patients with MPM received a 30-min infusion of 100 mg/m² methotrexate and, 30 min later, a 30-min infusion of 800 mg/m² gemcitabine. Twenty-four hours following the administration of methotrexate, leucovorin rescue therapy was initiated (10 mg/m² leucovorin administered 4 times at 6-h intervals). These treatments were administered weekly, with 4 weekly administrations constituting a cycle of therapy. A total of 88 cycles were administered to the 21 patients, with each patient receiving 1-10 cycles (median, 4.2 cycles). Eight patients (38.1%) exhibited a partial response, 10 patients (47.6%) had stable disease and 3 patients (14.3%) had progressive disease. The median overall survival was 19.4 months (range, 02-41 months). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 61.9 and 38.1%, respectively. Hematological toxicity was considered acceptable, with grade 3-4 toxicities occurring in 3 (14.3%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally mild. There was no treatment-related mortality. Our results suggest that methotrexate and gemcitabine combination therapy is feasible and effective in the treatment of MPM. This regimen may offer an alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy and a prospective trial including a larger cohort of patients is recommended to confirm these results.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: incidence, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and occupational health

BACKGROUND

The incidence of malignant mesothelioma in Germany is about 20 cases per million persons per year. Its association with asbestos exposure, usually occupational, has been unequivocally demonstrated. Even though the industrial use of asbestos was forbidden many years ago, new cases of mesothelioma continue to appear because of the long latency of the disease (median, 50 years). Its diagnosis and treatment still present a major challenge for ambulatory and in-hospital care and will do so for years to come.

METHODS

This article is based on a selective review of the literature, along with data from the German Mesothelioma Register.

RESULTS

1397 people died of mesothelioma in Germany in 2010. A plateau in the incidence of the disease is predicted between 2015 and 2030. Most mesotheliomas arise from the pleura. The histological subtype and the Karnofsky score are the main prognostic factors. Only limited data are now available to guide treatment with a combination of the available methods (chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy). The prognosis is still poor, with a median survival time of only 12 months. Symptom control and the preservation of the patient's quality of life are the main aspects of care for patients with mesothelioma.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of mesothelioma is not expected to drop in the next few years. The available treatments are chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Specialized treatment centers now increasingly provide multimodal therapy for treatment of mesothelioma.

Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: experience of Guy's and St Thomas' hospitals

PURPOSE

The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial. We present a prospective study of patients treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), and radical radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with MPM who were eligible for EPP and multimodality therapy were included in this study. Staging was through computed tomography and positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and mediastinoscopy. Our protocol involved three cycles of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy (54 Gy). All patients were followed up every 3-6 months until death.

RESULTS

From March 2004 through October 2008, 25 patients were referred for EPP following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EPP was performed in all but three patients, who were found to have T4 disease at surgery. Surgical complications included arrhythmias (28%), bronchopleural fistulas (12 %), reoperations for bleeding (8%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (4%), pneumonia (4%), septicemia (4%), vocal cord palsy (4%), and Horner's syndrome (4%). The 30-day mortality was 4%. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 81% of patients after EPP. Radiotherapy toxicities included thrombocytopenia, radiation pneumonitis, pulmonary embolus, radiation hepatitis, herpes zoster, transverse myelitis, and late constrictive pericarditis. Median survival from diagnosis was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval 7.8-17.7 months). One-year survival was 54.5%; 2-year survival was 18.2%. Disease progression occurred in 77.3% of patients. Nodal status (N0 disease versus N1-N2) or histology (epithelioid versus biphasic) had no significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent advances in chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy, survival rates remain low for patients with MPM completing multimodality therapy including EPP.

Cyberknife radiosurgery for focal paravertebral recurrence after radical pleurectomy/decortication in malignant pleural mesothelioma

We present a case of malignant pleural mesothelioma with focal relapse in the Azygos arch region after radical pleurectomy/decortication and adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour recurrence was successfully treated by Cyberknife radiosurgery (70 Gy in five fractions). Patient remains disease-free at 40 months without any other treatment.

Extrapleural pneumonectomy for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma: a harmful procedure

The effects on long-term post-operative quality of life (QoL) and disease-control in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) are compared. Seventy-seven patients affected by early-stage MPM received EPP (40) or P/D (37) associated with multimodal treatment between 1998 and 2009 at our institution. The last consecutive 39 (19 EPP and 20 P/D) were asked to answer the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and at 6- and 12-months after treatment completion to evaluate the impact on QoL of both procedures. QoL evaluation was stopped at recurrence demonstration. Twenty-five (62%) EPP vs 9 (24%) P/D patients (p = 0.002) had in-hospital major complications, and 2/40 (5%) EPP vs no one P/D patients died after surgery. Both procedures caused a significant impairment of all the considered variables of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire after treatment completion; only P/D patients returned at baseline levels after 12 months. EPP patients had a worse long-term post-operative QoL when compared with P/D. Median post-operative disease-free period was longer for EPP patients (14 vs 11 months) whereas the residual life to death period after recurrence detection was significantly longer for P/D patients (13 vs 9 months) (p = 0.01). Median long-term survival was longer, even not significant, for P/D patients (25 vs 20 months). MPM patients submitted to EPP had a higher post-operative complication rate, a worse long-term QoL, a shorter residual life time after recurrent disease, despite a similar long-term survival when compared to P/D.

A systematic review of extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

The primary objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

A systematic review of relevant studies identified through five online search databases was performed. Two reviewers independently appraised each study.

RESULTS

Thirty-four of 58 relevant studies from 26 institutions containing the most updated data were evaluated for survival and perioperative outcomes after EPP. The median overall survival varied from 9.4 to 27.5 months, and 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates ranged from 36 to 83%, 5 to 59%, and 0 to 24%, respectively. Overall perioperative mortality rates ranged from 0 to 11.8%, and the perioperative morbidity rates ranged from 22 to 82%. Quality of life assessments from three studies reported improvements in nearly all domains at 3 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent trimodality therapy involving EPP and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had a median overall survival of 13 to 23.9 months.

DISCUSSIONS

The current evidence suggests that selected patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma may benefit from EPP, especially when combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy.

Carboplatin plus pemetrexed as first-line treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II study

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rapidly progressive tumor that is increasing in frequency worldwide. Treatment options are limited, and response to chemotherapy is poor. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the activity of the carboplatin/pemetrexed combination as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable MPM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed MPM and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were enrolled. Treatment consisted of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL/min, both administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The treatment continued until 6 cycles were completed or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression were observed.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 18 (29%) had a confirmed partial response, whereas the disease remained stable in 34 patients (54.9%) and progressed in 10 patients (16.1%). The median overall survival (OS) was estimated at 14 months (95% CI, 11.8-16.2 months), and the median time to progression was 7 months (95% CI, 5.8-8.2 months). The difference in median OS between the epithelial histologic subtype (16 months) and the sarcomatoid subtype (11 months) was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the activity of the carboplatin/ pemetrexed combination in the first-line treatment of patients with MPM. It is a viable option, especially in cases in which side effects are generally anticipated.

Improving the outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma: nonaggressive or aggressive approach?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma continues to be a clinical challenge. The question, however, is no longer whether to provide active treatment or not, but how aggressive the treatment should be in view of the limited life expectancy of patients with this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

With platin and pemetrexed-based combination chemotherapy having become the preferred systemic therapy, the major questions now evolve around the identification of a suitable second line therapy and the quest for innovative new approaches. Surgical interventions from pleurectomy and decortication to extrapleural pneumonectomy have increasingly come of use in specialized centres. With neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy median survival times of almost 2 years have been reported. Studies on high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy suggested a beneficial effect on local recurrence. However, both extrapleural pneumonectomy and high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy are associated with potential treatment-related mortality and morbidity and cannot yet be recommended outside specialized centres.

SUMMARY

More than ever, the diagnosis and treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma mandate a multidisciplinary approach.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma continues to be a challenge. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma requires a multidisciplinary approach. The diagnosis is best made by thoracoscopic biopsy and the aid of immunohistochemistry. Molecular studies identified inactivation of the neurofibromatosis-2 gene and INK4alpha/ARF to be key events in tumorigenesis. Based on the results of a Phase III trial, the combination of cisplatin with pemetrexed has become the preferred choice for chemotherapy, although there is suggestive evidence for the activity of other platin combinations based on Phase II studies. The optimal second-line chemotherapy remains to be defined. Surgical interventions ranging from pleurectomy/decortication to extrapleural pneumonectomy are increasingly offered in specialized centers, and the results of multimodality approaches with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy are encouraging. Ongoing investigations are defining the role of postoperative radiotherapy and the clinical activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGFR2, histone deacetylase inhibitors and proteosome inhibitors.

Extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcomes of treatment and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes associated with extrapleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

From October 1994 to April 2008, 70 patients were selected for extrapleural pneumonectomy. Univariate analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis with entering and removing limits of P less than .10 and P greater than .05, respectively, was used. The prognostic factors included age, gender, side of disease, asbestos exposure, histology, positron emission tomography, date of surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, completeness of cytoreduction, lymph node involvement, perioperative morbidity, adjuvant radiotherapy, and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 55 years (standard deviation = 10). Fifty-eight patients had epithelial tumors. Six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 28 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 16 patients received postoperative pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Forty-four patients had no lymph node involvement. The perioperative morbidity and mortality were 37% and 5.7%, respectively. Complications included hemothorax (n = 7), atrial fibrillation (n = 6), empyema (n = 4), bronchopulmonary fistula (n = 3), right-sided heart failure (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 1), constrictive pericarditis (n = 1), acute pulmonary edema (n = 1), small bowel herniation (n = 1), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (n = 1). The median survival was 20 months, with a 3-year survival of 30%. Asbestos exposure, negative lymph node involvement, and receipt of adjuvant radiation or postoperative pemetrexed-based chemotherapy were associated with improved survival on both univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports the use of extrapleural pneumonectomy-based multimodal therapy in carefully selected patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Molecular Basis of Pulmonary Disease

Pulmonary pathology includes a large spectrum of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases that affect the lung. Many of these are a result of the unusual relationship of the lung with the outside world. Every breath that a human takes brings the outside world into the body in the form of infectious agents, organic and inorganic particles, and noxious agents of all types. Although the lung has many defense mechanisms to protect itself from these insults, these are not infallible; therefore, lung pathology arises. Damage to the lung is particularly important given the role of the lung in the survival of the organism. Any impairment of lung function has widespread effects throughout the body, since all organs depend on the lungs for the oxygen they need. Pulmonary pathology catalogs the changes in the lung tissues and the mechanisms through which these occur. This chapter presents a review of lung pathology and the current state of knowledge about the pathogenesis of each disease. It suggests that a clear understanding of both morphology and mechanism is required for the development of new therapies and preventive measures.

Preoperative staging of mesothelioma by 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fused imaging and mediastinoscopy compared to pathological findings after extrapleural pneumonectomy

OBJECTIVES

Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) in MPM may be confined with both morbidity and mortality and careful preoperative staging identifying resectable patients is important. Staging is difficult and the accuracy of preoperative CT scan, 18F-FDG PET/CT scan (PET/CT), and mediastinoscopy is unclear. The objectives were to compare these staging techniques to each other and to surgical-pathological findings.

METHODS

Patients had epithelial subtype MPM, age <or=70 years, and lung function test allowing pneumonectomy. Preoperative staging after 3-6 courses of induction chemotherapy included conventional CT scan, PET/CT, and mediastinoscopy. Surgical-pathological findings were compared to preoperative findings.

RESULTS

Forty-two consecutive patients were without T4 or M on CT scan. PET/CT showed inoperability in 12 patients (29%) due to T4 (7 patients) and M1 (7 patients). Among 30 patients with subsequent mediastinoscopy, including 10 with N2/N3 on PET/CT, N2 were histologically verified in 6 (20%). Among 24 resected patients, T4 occurred in 2 patients (8%), and N2 in 4 (17%), all being PET/CT negative. PET/CT accuracy of T4 and N2/N3 compared to combined histological results of mediastinoscopy and EPP showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 78% and 50%, 100% and 75%, 100% and 50%, 94% and 75%, not applicable and 5.0, and 0.22 and 0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-curative surgery is avoided in 29% out of 42 MPM patients by preoperative PET/CT and in further 14% by mediastinoscopy. Even though both procedures are valuable, there are false negative findings with both, urging for even more accurate staging procedures.

The efficacy and safety of weekly vinorelbine in relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rapidly progressive invariably lethal tumor. Treatment options remain limited and the outcome in relapsed disease is poor warranting new therapeutic options. Following our previous experience in the first-line setting, we conducted a phase 2 open-label non-comparative study to assess the safety and efficacy of weekly vinorelbine chemotherapy, each cycle consisting of 30 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks, in patients with previous exposure to chemotherapy. In 63 individuals with relapsed MPM who had not received previous vinorelbine, we observed an objective response rate of 16% and an overall survival of 9.6 months (95% confidence interval 7.3-11.8 months). The main grade III/IV toxicity observed was neutropenia and toxicity was similar to weekly vinorelbine when used in the first-line setting. Weekly vinorelbine appeared to have a reasonable response rate with an acceptable toxicity profile in the second-line treatment of MPM. Its use should be prospectively evaluated in a randomised trial in the first or second-line therapy of MPM.

Multidisciplinary treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is increasing worldwide, and is predicted to peak in the next 10-20 years. Difficulties in MPM diagnosis and staging, especially of early disease, have thwarted the development of a universally accepted therapeutic approach. Single modality therapies (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) have generally failed to significantly prolong patient survival. As a result, multimodality treatment regimens have been developed. Radical surgery with extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant treatments has become the preferred option in early disease, but the benefits of such an aggressive approach have been questioned because of significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In the past few years, there have been several major advances in the management of patients with MPM, including more accurate staging and patient selection, improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative care, novel chemotherapy regimens with definite activity such as antifolate (pemetrexed or raltitrexed)-platinum combinations, and new radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy has shown promising results. A number of molecular alterations occurring in MPM have been reported, providing broader insights into its biology and leading to the identification of new targets for therapy. However, currently available treatments still appear to have modest results. Further studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of early and advanced stages of this disease.

Gene methylation in pleural mesothelioma: correlations with clinico-pathological features and patient's follow-up

Methylation of tumor suppressor genes is among the most frequent alterations in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The aim of this study was to analyze the promoter methylation status of four tumor suppressor genes, p15(INK4B), p16(INK4A), RASSF1A and NORE1A in MPM. Samples of 79 MPM patients were analyzed using a methylation-specific PCR method. Associations between methylation status, clinico-pathological parameters (including proliferation index) and overall survival (OS) were examined. The analysis documented methylation in 30 cases (38%). The methylation frequency for individual genes was 19% for p15(INK4B) (n=15), 11.4% for p16(INK4A) (n=9), 20.2% for RASSF1A (n=16) and 5.1% for Nore1A (n=4). In the whole series methylation was associated to an increased proliferation index (P=0.05). In patients treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy, methylated MPM showed a trend to a poorer OS in comparison to unmethylated cases (median OS 16 months vs. 35 months, P=0.06, HR=2.01, 95% CI 0.95-4.30). In the overall population, methylation did not correlate to patient outcome but a trend to an improved survival was detectable in ummethylated MPM treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy. This result suggests the need to select homogeneously treated and staged patients with MPM to address whether their methylation profile may impact on patient's survival.

Management options for malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical and cost considerations

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a resistant form of lung cancer that is often related to prior asbestos exposure. While surgical resection and radiotherapy techniques have been refined in recent years, neither has been proven to significantly extend patient survival compared with untreated controls. Until the release of pemetrexed in 2004, even combination chemotherapy regimens often resulted in a response rate of <20%. A recent phase III trial documented a 41.3% response rate for cisplatin plus pemetrexed. In the future, new multimodality regimens featuring novel targeted therapies directed against molecular targets, such as the vascular endothelial growth factor, hold the greatest promise for improved outcomes in MPM. The standard radiographic assessment of response to MPM therapy remains a poor surrogate for clinically relevant endpoints such as median survival. Furthermore, it is not currently known whether aggressive multimodality treatment for MPM will improve survival or quality of life above and beyond symptomatic care. Ongoing clinical trials are comparing chemotherapy and surgery with supportive care in an effort to define the role of different therapies in MPM. MPM treatment is a costly public health issue; after efficacy is proven, additional studies are needed to measure the cost effectiveness of MPM treatment regimens.

Accuracy of pleural biopsy using thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of histologic subtype in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Promising results with trimodality therapy combining surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have been obtained in the management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, the histologic subtype has to be taken into account because of its influence on prognosis. The aim of the current study was to analyze retrospectively the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of preoperative thoracoscopy for diagnosis of the histologic subtype of MPM.

METHODS

The histologic reports from all consecutive patients undergoing 'intent-to-treat' surgery from 3 institutions as well as the initial pathologic diagnosis obtained using thoracoscopy were reviewed and compared after institutional review board approval. All cases of MPM were confirmed by a panel of pathologists.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included in the current study. Of these 95 patients, 75 underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy, 9 patients underwent pleurectomy/decortication, and 11 patients underwent pleurectomy. Of the 95 patients with a final diagnosis of MPM, 80 (84.2%) were classified as having epithelial and 15 (15.8%) as having biphasic subtype. Among the 87 patients classified as having MPM of epithelial subtype after the initial thoracoscopy, 75 cases (86.2%) were confirmed to be a true histologic diagnosis and 12 cases (13.8%) were found to be of biphasic subtype at final diagnosis. One patient with a biphasic subtype at initial thoracoscopy was found to have MPM of epithelial subtype after surgery. The sensitivity and specificity values of an epithelial subtype diagnosis after thoracoscopy were 94% and 20%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 37%. Conversely, the sensitivity and specificity values of a biphasic subtype diagnosis after thoracoscopy were 20% and 98%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 75% and a negative predictive value of 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural biopsy performed using thoracoscopy is considered to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis and pleural staging of MPM. However, this procedure appears to be less efficient in diagnosing the histologic subtype as either epithelial or biphasic.

Efficacy and safety of first- or second-line irinotecan, cisplatin, and mitomycin in mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rapidly progressive lethal tumor. Treatment options remain limited and the outcome in recurrent disease is poor.

METHODS

A Phase II open-label noncomparative study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the triplet combination irinotecan, cisplatin, and mitomycin-C (IPM) chemotherapy in untreated patients and in those with previous exposure to chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In 62 patients an objective response rate of 25% was observed. In the first-line setting progression-free survival measured 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.3) and overall survival was 10.8 months (95% CI: 7.9-13.7). In the second-line setting progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI: 3.4-11.2) and overall survival was also 7.3 months (95% CI: 4.8-9.8). Psychosocial well-being improved during chemotherapy and the main toxicity observed was neutropenia (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

IPM appeared to have a reasonable response rate with an acceptable toxicity profile in the first- and second-line treatment of MPM.

Biology and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive tumour, with a poor prognosis and an increasing incidence as a result of widespread exposure to asbestos. The results of the treatments available are poor. Surgery and radiotherapy have a limited role in highly selected patients and systemic therapy is the only potential treatment option for the majority of patients. Despite some definite activity of the novel antifolates such as pemetrexed and raltitrexed, the results, even in combination with platinating agents, are still modest, with a median survival of approximately one year. The better understanding of the biology of mesothelioma makes the assessment of a number of targeted agents particularly interesting. Unfortunately, the targeted agents imatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib and thalidomide have been shown to be ineffective in unselected patients. Studies with anti-angiogenesis agents are ongoing. An improvement of the knowledge of major molecular pathways involved in malignant mesothelioma is needed in order to define proper targets for the systemic treatment of this disease.

Ranpirnase--an antitumour ribonuclease: its potential role in malignant mesothelioma

Ranpirnase (Onconase) is a novel cytotoxic ribonuclease. In clinical development as a single agent in patients with malignant mesothelioma (MM), at 480 microg/m2 intravenously weekly, analysis of survival indicated prolonged periods of stable disease in Phase II trials and a potential survival benefit, compared with doxorubicin, in a small unpublished Phase III trial. In all clinical studies it has generally demonstrated a favourable safety profile except for easily controlled allergic reactions and dose modifications for renal impairment. Standard first-line treatment for MM has recently been established with an antifolate and cisplatin. At present, a Phase III trial of doxorubicin with or without ranpirnase is nearing completion in MM patients without prior chemotherapy or one prior chemotherapy regimen.