Pre-operative plasma erythropoietin concentration and survival following surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

The prognostic impact of decreased pretreatment haemoglobin level on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have reported the prognostic value of haemoglobin level for cancers. Whereas the prognostic impact of decreased pretreatment haemoglobin level on the survival of patients with lung cancer remains controversial, herein, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate whether a decreased haemoglobin level before treatment is a significant predictor of survival in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the prognostic impact of a decreased haemoglobin level on the survival of patients with lung cancer. Relevant studies were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Reference lists were hand-searched for potentially eligible studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. Observational studies were included if they provided sufficient information for the extraction of the pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, progression-free survival, event-free survival and time to progression. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were applied to explain the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fifty-five articles involving a total of 22,719 patients were obtained to evaluate the correlation between haemoglobin level and survival. The results indicated that decreased haemoglobin level was significantly associated with poor overall survival of patients with lung cancer (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.42-1.61), both in non-small cell lung cancer (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.44-1.72) and in small cell lung cancer (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.21-2.02). We also found that the lower the haemoglobin level, the shorter was the overall survival of patients with lung cancer (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.16). However, the relationship between decreased haemoglobin and relapse-free survival was not significant (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91-2.05).

CONCLUSION

A decreased pretreatment haemoglobin level among patients with lung cancer is a prognostic factor of poor survival that can serve as an important indicator in survival prediction, risk stratification and treatment selection. In clinical practice, more attention should be paid to monitoring pretreatment haemoglobin levels among patients with lung cancer.

Erythropoietin receptor expression is a potential prognostic factor in human lung adenocarcinoma

Recombinant human erythropoietins (rHuEPOs) are used to treat cancer-related anemia. Recent preclinical studies and clinical trials, however, have raised concerns about the potential tumor-promoting effects of these drugs. Because the clinical significance of erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) signaling in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) also remains controversial, our aim was to study whether EPO treatment modifies tumor growth and if EPOR expression has an impact on the clinical behavior of this malignancy. A total of 43 patients with stage III–IV adenocarcinoma (ADC) and complete clinicopathological data were included. EPOR expression in human ADC samples and cell lines was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Effects of exogenous rHuEPOα were studied on human lung ADC cell lines in vitro. In vivo growth of human ADC xenografts treated with rHuEPOα with or without chemotherapy was also assessed. In vivo tumor and endothelial cell (EC) proliferation was determined by 5-bromo-2’-deoxy-uridine (BrdU) incorporation and immunofluorescent labeling. Although EPOR mRNA was expressed in all of the three investigated ADC cell lines, rHuEPOα treatment (either alone or in combination with gemcitabine) did not alter ADC cell proliferation in vitro. However, rHuEPOα significantly decreased tumor cell proliferation and growth of human H1975 lung ADC xenografts. At the same time, rHuEPOα treatment of H1975 tumors resulted in accelerated tumor endothelial cell proliferation. Moreover, in patients with advanced stage lung ADC, high intratumoral EPOR mRNA levels were associated with significantly increased overall survival. This study reveals high EPOR level as a potential novel positive prognostic marker in human lung ADC.

Evaluating erythropoietin-associated tumor progression using archival tissues from a phase III clinical trial

Despite the prevalence of anemia in cancer, recombinant erythropoietin (Epo) has declined in use because of recent Phase III trials showing more rapid cancer progression and reduced survival in subjects randomized to Epo. Since Epo receptor (EpoR), Jak2, and Hsp70 are well-characterized mediators of Epo signaling in erythroid cells, we hypothesized that Epo might be especially harmful in patients whose tumors express high levels of these effectors. Because of the insensitivity of immunohistochemistry for detecting low level EpoR protein, we developed assays to measure levels of EpoR, Jak2 and Hsp70 mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors. We tested 23 archival breast tumors as well as 136 archival head and neck cancers from ENHANCE, a Phase III trial of 351 patients randomized to Epo versus placebo concomitant with radiotherapy following complete resection, partial resection, or no resection of tumor. EpoR, Jak2, and Hsp70 mRNA levels varied >30-fold, >12-fold, and >13-fold across the breast cancers, and >30-fold, >40-fold, and >30-fold across the head and neck cancers, respectively. Locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) did not differ among patients whose head and neck cancers expressed above- versus below-median levels of EpoR, Jak2 or Hsp70, except in the subgroup of patients with unresected tumors (n = 28), where above-median EpoR, above-median Jak2, and below-median Hsp70 mRNA levels were all associated with significantly poorer LPFS. Our results provide a framework for exploring the relationship between Epo, cancer progression, and survival using archival tumors from other Phase III clinical trials.

Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor coexpression is associated with poor survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic effect of erythropoietin (EPO) and EPO receptor (EPO-R) expression in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

EPO and EPO-R expression in 158 tumor samples from resected stage I NSCLC was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and tissue array technology.

RESULTS

EPO-R and EPO were highly expressed in 20.9% and 35.4% of tumors, respectively. High EPO-R expression compared with negative or low-level expression was associated with a poor 5-year disease-specific survival (60.6% versus 80.8%; P = 0.01, log-rank test). High EPO expression compared with negative and low-level expression was associated with a trend toward a poor 5-year disease-specific survival (69.6% versus 80.4%; P = 0.13, log-rank test). A high level of EPO-R and EPO coexpression was associated with a poor 5-year disease-specific survival compared with other groups of patients (50.0% versus 80.0% survival at the end of follow-up; P = 0.005, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis for disease-specific survival, high-level EPO-R and EPO coexpression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (hazard ratio, 2.214; 95% confidence interval, 1.012-4.848; P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

These results establish the pejorative prognostic value of EPO and EPO-R expression in early-stage resected NSCLC and suggest a potential paracrine and/or autocrine role of endogenous EPO in NSCLC aggressiveness.

Factors influencing perioperative blood transfusions in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing major cancer resections often receive blood transfusions (TFs). Preoperative erythropoietin (EPO) offers the rationale to reduce TFs and related morbidity.

METHODS

Perioperative TF information was collected prospectively in a single surgeon practice over 5 years.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-four patients underwent a major procedure, including pancreatic (n = 130, 38%), hepatobiliary (n = 87, 25%), gastroesophageal (n = 69, 20%), and other operations (n = 58, 17%). Median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375 mL. PRBC TFs were given in 83 cases (24%), at a median of 2 units [1-16]. TF frequency and EBL did not differ between diagnoses. Multivariate TF associations existed for Hgb (P < 0.0001, OR 0.335), EBL (P < 0.0001, OR 1.007), serum Cl (P = 0.004, OR 1.25), serum Na (P = 0.02, OR 0.810), and age (P = 0.04, OR 1.033). TFs (versus no TFs) were linked to major complications (43 versus 20%, P = 0.0002), mortality (12% versus 3%, P = 0.001), and increased LOS (9 versus 7 days, P < 0.0001). A potential benefit for preoperative EPO to avoid TFs could be derived for only 31 patients (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this low TF rate of 24% for major visceral resections, few preoperative parameters are able to identify subgroups at risk for TFs aside from blood counts. Our data would not support generalized preoperative EPO administration.

Erythropoietin in cancer: presumption of innocence?

Erythropoietin emerged as the biggest drug in oncology despite never having demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with cancer. Two phase III clinical trials reported more than 3 years ago that erythropoietin adversely affected cancer survival rates, due mainly to tumor progression. Despite changes to the product label for erythropoietins in 2004, clinical practice remained unchanged until recent weeks when, following reports of three new phase III studies and a phase II trial, a "black box warning" for erythropoietin products was issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Whether erythropoietin products can be considered safe when used for FDA-approved indications is currently at issue; however, addressing this question will be difficult until the mechanisms of erythropoietin-stimulated tumor progression are understood. A thorough evaluation of materials from clinical trials already completed may shed new light on how erythropoietin promotes cancer progression. Until these issues are resolved, oncologists should inform their patients of erythropoietin's potential adverse impact on cancer progression and survival. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.