Neighborhood disadvantage and lung cancer risk in a national cohort of never smoking Black women

Sociodemographic Disparities in Rectal Cancer Outcomes within Academic Cancer Centers

BACKGROUND

Sociodemographic disparities in cancer care outcomes are often related to delayed or limited care access. However, it is unknown whether outcome differences persist after establishing high-level care. This study evaluated the relationship between rectal cancer outcomes and sociodemographic status at academic cancer centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with rectal cancer treated at academic cancer centers was conducted utilizing the National Cancer Database. Primary outcome was overall survival, while secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality, time from diagnosis to treatments, hospital readmission rates, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Of the 127,023 patients, median age was 62.7 years (SD 11.92), 59.3% were male, 80.3% were white, and 39.4% presented with stage III disease. After adjustment, Black patients had the worst overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, p = 0.016). Private insurance status conferred overall survival benefit (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.75, p < 0.001) as well as the best protection against 30- and 90- day postoperative mortality (30-day OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.97, p = 0.044; 90-day OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.83, p = 0.015). Black patients experienced longer time to first treatment than their white counterparts, with a delay of 3.23 days (95% CI 1.87-4.58, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the existence of sociodemographic disparities even within the walls of academic institutions, where care should be evidence-based, standardized, comprehensive, and equitable. When analyzing causal pathways, delays in time to treatment initiation may be contributing to these outcomes, but may be modifiable.

Fine particulate matter exposure and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Studies examining the relationship between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and cancer risk is inconclusive, with an evident scarcity of comprehensive data on the overall cancer risk. Given the emergence of new evidence, updated meta-analyses is essential. A search was performed on multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to Jan 2025. Hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), or incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled. Moreover, a comprehensive and detailed quality assessment of the included studies was conducted to validate the plausibility of the findings. Overall, 57 original studies were included, covering 36 cancer categories and including overall cancer and malignancies specific to particular anatomical sites. For each increase of 10 μg per cubic meter in PM2.5 concentration, there was an observed pooled HR of 1.07 for overall cancer (95 %CI:1.02-1.13). In the case of site-specific cancers, the pooled HRs were 1.11 (95 %CI:1.07-1.15), 1.06 (95 %CI:1.02-1.11), 1.17 (95 %CI:1.07-1.28), and 1.14 (95 %CI:1.03-1.26) for lung, breast, liver and esophageal cancers, respectively. Furthermore, PM2.5 exposure may potentially correlate with the risk of cancers at other anatomical locations including upper aerodigestive tract, oral cavity, kidney, skin, as well as digestive organs. In light of available evidence, it is inferred that PM2.5 exposure could potentially raise overall cancer risk with moderate certainty. As for site-specific malignancies, there is very low certainty evidence for lung cancer, low certainty evidence for breast cancer, and moderate certainty evidence for both liver and esophageal cancers.

Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Risk of Lung Cancer Among Nonsmokers in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aims to explore the link between exposure to tobacco smoke among nonsmokers and the risk of lung cancer in the United States. We searched six databases for studies on second-hand smoke (SHS) and lung cancer following PRISMA guidelines. Following the random effects model and specific statistical methods, our meta-analysis analyzed studies based on SHS exposure type. A total of 19 eligible studies were included in the review and 15 in the meta-analysis. We covered exposure from parents (childhood), spouses and partners (household), and work-related exposure (colleagues), with higher risk among non-smoking children and domestic partners. Findings reveal a consistent link between SHS exposure and increased lung cancer risk for this population (exposure effect sizes: 1.05-3.11). Analysis of childhood SHS exposure reveals a distinct increased risk associated with parental exposure. For nonsmokers living with smoking spouses, there is a marked 41% increase in risk. Higher risk was associated with more and more prolonged SHS exposure. Exposure to SHS in the workplace shows a correlation with lung cancer risk. Our findings highlight increased SHS-related lung cancer risk, particularly among non-smoking children and domestic partners, intensifying with the amount and duration of exposure, indicating the significant impact of SHS within domestic environments.

Association between socioeconomic position and lung cancer incidence in 16 countries: a prospective cohort consortium study

Background

Studies have reported higher lung cancer incidence among groups with lower socioeconomic position (SEP). However, it is not known how this difference in lung cancer incidence between SEP groups varies across different geographical settings. Furthermore, most prior studies that assessed the association between SEP and lung cancer incidence were conducted without detailed adjustment for smoking. Therefore, we aimed to assess this relationship across world regions.

Methods

In this international prospective cohort consortium study, we used data from the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium (LC3), which includes 20 prospective population cohorts from 16 countries in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Participants were enrolled between 1985 and 2010 and followed for cancer outcomes using registry linkages and/or active follow-up. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between educational level (our primary measure of SEP, in 4 categories) and incident lung cancer using Cox proportional hazards models separately for participants with and without a smoking history. The models were adjusted for age, sex, cohort (when multiple cohorts were included), smoking duration, cigarettes per day, and time since cessation.

Findings

Among 2,487,511 participants, 53,830 developed lung cancer during a 13.5-year median follow-up (IQR = 6.5-15.0 years). Among participants with a smoking history, higher education was associated with decreased lung cancer incidence in nearly every cohort after detailed smoking adjustment. By world region, this association was observed in North America (HR per one-category increase in education [HRtrend] = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.87-0.89), Europe (HRtrend = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.88-0.91), and Asia (HRtrend = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86-0.96), but not in the Australian study (HRtrend = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.95-1.09). By histological subtype, education associated most strongly with squamous cell carcinoma and more weakly with adenocarcinoma (p-heterogeneity < 0.0001). Among participants who never smoked, there was no association between education and lung cancer incidence in any cohort (all p-trend > 0.05), except the USA Southern Community Cohort Study (HRtrend = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62-0.90).

Interpretation

Based on longitudinal data from 2.5 million participants from 16 countries, our findings suggest that higher educational attainment was associated with lower lung cancer risk among participants with a smoking history, but not among participants who never smoked. Limitations of our study include that cohort participants cannot fully represent the general populations of the geographical regions included, and education was the only measure of SEP consistently available across our consortium.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the Lung Cancer Research Foundation (LCRF), and the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF).

Acyl Urea Compounds Therapeutics and its Inhibition for Cancers in Women: A Review

Acyl urea compounds have garnered significant attention in cancer therapeutics, particularly for their potential effectiveness against cancers that predominantly affect women, such as breast and ovarian cancers. The paper presents a report on the investigation of acyl urea compounds that are reported to involve a multi-faceted approach, including synthetic chemistry, biological assays, and computational modeling. A wealth of information on acyl urea and its purported effects on cancer affecting women has been gathered from different sources and condensed to provide readers with a broad understanding of the role of acyl urea in combating cancer. Acylureas demonstrate promising results by selectively inhibiting key molecular targets associated with cancer progressions, such as EGFR, ALK, HER2, and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Specifically, targeting acyl ureas impedes tumor proliferation and metastasis while minimizing harm to healthy tissues, offering a targeted therapeutic approach with reduced side effects compared to conventional chemotherapy. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to optimize the efficacy and safety profiles of acylurea-based therapies and broaden their applicability across various cancer types. Acyl urea compounds represent a promising class of therapeutics for the treatment of cancers in women, particularly due to their ability to selectively inhibit key molecular targets involved in tumor growth and progression. The combination of synthetic optimization, biological evaluation, and computational modeling has facilitated the identification of several lead compounds with significant anticancer potential. This abstract explores the therapeutic mechanisms and targeted pathways of acyl ureas in combating these malignancies, which will be useful for future studies.

Impact of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Preventive and Acute Care Utilization in Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND

Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience significant healthcare disparities; however, there is little known on the impact of psychosocial stressors and neighborhood disadvantage on preventive and acute care utilization in this population.

PROCEDURE

A retrospective data collection was performed for all patients cared for at a comprehensive pediatric sickle cell center in the Midwest who had also completed the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), a validated caregiver-reported measurement of family psychosocial risk, from September 2021 through December 2022. Patient age, payor, primary language, frequency of acute and missed preventive care visits, as well as Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Childhood Opportunity Index (COI) scores were collected for 256 patients.

RESULTS

The average state ADI was 6.3 (±2.9), and the majority of patients were in the Very Low or Low COI categories. Total PAT score (p = 0.003), state ADI (p < 0.001), and state COI (p < 0.001) were all significantly correlated with missed SCD clinic visits, with increased odds of a missed visit with increasing neighborhood disadvantage (OR 1.22, p < 0.001). The odds of acute care were also increased in those with higher family psychosocial risk (OR 1.76, p < 0.011), though this was not seen with ADI or COI, suggesting an additional effect of family stressors and resilience on acute care utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

This highlights the importance of regular, universal social and psychological risk screening, as well as inclusion of psychosocial team members in SCD programs to identify and readily address risk factors that impact child outcomes in a minoritized chronic disease population.

Identifying priority populations for lung cancer screening intervention using neighborhood-level factors and cancer registry data

To evaluate the association of neighborhood level economic, environmental, and social indicators with lung cancer (LC) incidence and mortality. Data for adult incident LC cases in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, diagnosed between 2015-2019 were obtained from Pennsylvania cancer registry. Cases were summarized at census-tract level. Publicly available data on neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), built environment, and racial isolation at census-tracts were linked to cases. Poisson regression was used to compute relative risk (RR) for LC incidence and mortality, adjusting for covariates. A total of 3256 LC cases were included in the analyses. About 68% were ≥65 years, 54% female, 14% Black or African American, and 63% deceased. Results of the multivariable model found that increasing quintiles (Q) of NDI were significantly associated with increasing risk of LC incidence and mortality. The RRs (95% confidence interval) of LC incidence for Q2, Q3, Q4 and Q5 were 1.36 (1.21-1.52), 1.55 (1.40-1.72), 1.68 (1.51-1.87), 2.08 (1.82-2.38), respectively, compared with Q1 (P trend <0.01). The corresponding RRs for LC mortality were 1.46 (1.27-1.68), 1.63 (1.42-1.88), 1.74 (1.51-2.01), 2.04 (2.02-2.88) (P trend <0.01). Targeted interventions for LC prevention and early detection in high NDI neighborhoods may be more effective to reduce LC health disparities.

Disparities across the continuum of lung cancer care: a review of recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Health disparities have long been noted in lung cancer incidence and survival and persist across the continuum of care. Understanding the gaps in care that arise from disparities in lung cancer risk, screening, treatment, and survivorship are essential to guiding efforts to achieve equitable care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature continues to show that Black people, women, and people who experience socioeconomic disadvantage or live in rural areas experience disparities throughout the spectrum of lung cancer care. Contributing factors include structural racism, lower education level and health literacy, insurance type, healthcare facility accessibility, inhaled carcinogen exposure, and unmet social needs. Promising strategies to improve lung cancer care equity include policy to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke and harmful pollutants, more inclusive lung cancer screening eligibility criteria, improved access and patient navigation in lung cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment, more deliberate offering of appropriate surgical and medical treatments, and improved availability of survivorship and palliative care.

SUMMARY

Given ongoing disparities in lung cancer care, research to determine best practices for narrowing these gaps and to guide policy change are an essential focus of future lung cancer research.

The Role of Smoking Status in Making Risk-Informed Diagnostic Decisions in the Lung Cancer Pathway: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Professionals and Patients

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer clinical guidelines and risk tools often rely on smoking history as a significant risk factor. However, never-smokers make up 14% of the lung cancer population, and this proportion is rising. Consequently, they are often perceived as low-risk and may experience diagnostic delays. This study aimed to explore how clinicians make risk-informed diagnostic decisions for never-smokers.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 lung cancer diagnosticians, supported by data from interviews with 20 never-smoker lung cancer patients. The data were analyzed using a framework analysis based on the Model of Pathways to Treatment framework and data-driven interpretations.

RESULTS

Participants described 3 main strategies for making risk-informed decisions incorporating smoking status: guidelines, heuristics, and potential harms. Clinicians supplemented guidelines with their own heuristics for never-smokers, such as using higher thresholds for chest X-ray. Decisions were easier for patients with high-risk symptoms such as hemoptysis. Clinicians worried about overinvestigating never-smoker patients, particularly in terms of physical and psychological harms from invasive procedures or radiation. To minimize unnecessary anxiety about lung cancer risk, clinicians made efforts to downplay this. Conversely, some patients found that this caused process harms such as delays and miscommunications.

CONCLUSION

Improved guidance and methods of risk differentiation for never-smokers are needed to avoid diagnostic delays, overreassurance, and clinical pessimism. This requires an improved evidence base and initiatives to increase awareness among clinicians of the incidence of lung cancer in never-smokers. As the proportion of never-smoker patients increases, this issue will become more urgent.

HIGHLIGHTS

Smoking status is the most common risk factor used by clinicians to guide decision making, and guidelines often focus on this factor.Some clinicians also use their own heuristics for never-smokers, and this becomes particularly relevant for patients with lower risk symptoms.Clinicians are also concerned about the potential harms and risks associated with deploying resources on diagnostics for never-smokers.Some patients find it difficult to decide whether or not to go ahead with certain procedures due to efforts made by clinicians to downplay the risk of lung cancer.Overall, the study highlights the complex interplay between smoking history, clinical decision making, and patient anxiety in the context of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Structural Racism and Lung Cancer Risk: A Scoping Review

Importance

Structural racism is associated with persistent inequities in health and health outcomes in the US for racial and ethnic minority groups. This review summarizes how structural racism contributes to differential population-level exposure to lung cancer risk factors and thus disparate lung cancer risk across different racial and ethnic groups.

Observations

A scoping review was conducted focusing on structural racism and lung cancer risk for racial and ethnic minority groups. The domains of structural racism evaluated included housing and built environment, occupation and employment, health care, economic and educational opportunity, private industry, perceived stress and discrimination, and criminal justice involvement. The PubMed, Embase, and MedNar databases were searched for English-language studies in the US from January 1, 2010, through June 30, 2022. The review demonstrated that racial and ethnic minority groups are more likely to have environmental exposures to air pollution and known carcinogens due to segregation of neighborhoods and poor housing quality. In addition, racial and ethnic minority groups were more likely to have exposures to pesticides, silica, and asbestos secondary to higher employment in manual labor occupations. Furthermore, targeted marketing and advertisement of tobacco products by private industry were more likely to occur in neighborhoods with more racial and ethnic minority groups. In addition, poor access to primary care services and inequities in insurance status were associated with elevated lung cancer risk among racial and ethnic minority groups. Lastly, inequities in tobacco use and cessation services among individuals with criminal justice involvement had important implications for tobacco use among Black and Hispanic populations.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that structural racism must be considered as a fundamental contributor to the unequal distribution of lung cancer risk factors and thus disparate lung cancer risk across different racial and ethnic groups. Additional research is needed to better identify mechanisms contributing to inequitable lung cancer risk and tailor preventive interventions.

Structural Racism as a Contributor to Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates Among Black Populations in the United States

BACKGROUND

Although racial disparities in lung cancer incidence and mortality have diminished in recent years, lung cancer remains the second most diagnosed cancer among US Black populations. Many factors contributing to disparities in lung cancer are rooted in structural racism. To quantify this relationship, we examined associations between a multidimensional measure of county-level structural racism and county lung cancer incidence and mortality rates among Black populations, while accounting for county levels of environmental quality.

METHODS

We merged 2016-2020 data from the United States Cancer Statistics Data Visualization Tool, a pre-existing county-level structural racism index, the Environmental Protection Agency's 2006-2010 Environmental Quality Index (EQI), 2023 County Health Rankings, and the 2021 United States Census American Community Survey. We conducted multivariable linear regressions to examine associations between county-level structural racism and county-level lung cancer incidence and mortality rates.

RESULTS

Among Black males and females, each standard deviation increase in county-level structural racism score was associated with an increase in county-level lung cancer incidence of 6.4 (95% CI: 4.4, 8.5) cases per 100,000 and an increase of 3.3 (95% CI: 2.0, 4.6) lung cancer deaths per 100,000. When examining these associations stratified by sex, larger associations between structural racism and lung cancer rates were observed among Black male populations than among Black females.

CONCLUSION

Structural racism contributes to both the number of new lung cancer cases and the number of deaths caused by lung cancer among Black populations. Those aiming to reduce lung cancer cases and deaths should consider addressing racism as a root-cause.

Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study

Introduction

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-clinical factors that may affect the outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of SDOH factors on quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes for lung cancer surgery patients.

Methods

Thirteen patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a dyadic self-management intervention were invited and agreed to participate in semi-structured key informant interviews at study completion (3 months post-discharge). A conventional content analysis approach was used to identify codes and themes that were derived from the interviews. Independent investigators coded the qualitative data, which were subsequently confirmed by a second group of independent investigators. Themes were finalized, and discrepancies were reviewed and resolved.

Results

Six themes, each with several subthemes, emerged. Overall, most participants were knowledgeable about the concept of SDOH and perceived that provider awareness of SDOH information was important for the delivery of comprehensive care in surgery. Some participants described financial challenges during treatment that were exacerbated by their cancer diagnosis and resulted in stress and poor QOL. The perceived impact of education varied and included its importance in navigating the healthcare system, decision-making on health behaviors, and more economic mobility opportunities. Some participants experienced barriers to accessing healthcare due to insurance coverage, travel burden, and the fear of losing quality insurance coverage due to retirement. Neighborhood and built environment factors such as safety, air quality, access to green space, and other environmental factors were perceived as important to QOL. Social support through families/friends and spiritual/religious communities was perceived as important to postoperative recovery.

Discussion

Among lung cancer surgery patients, SDOH factors can impact QOL and the patient's survivorship journey. Importantly, SDOH should be assessed routinely to identify patients with unmet needs across the five domains. SDOH-driven interventions are needed to address these unmet needs and to improve the QOL and quality of care for lung cancer surgery patients.