Safety and efficacy of anlotinib in combination with standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A multi-center, prospective study (ACTION-2)

Deep analysis of the trials and major challenges in the first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

The median overall survival (OS) is approximately 10 months when chemotherapy alone is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The approval of the two PD-L1 inhibitors, atezolizumab and durvalumab, marked the beginning of the immunotherapy era for ES-SCLC. Serplulimab, as the first PD-1 inhibitor to achieve success in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, has not only demonstrated significant improvements in patient survival outcomes but also ushered in a new era for PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of ES-SCLC. Recently, antiangiogenic agents with chemo-immunotherapy have achieved breakthroughs in first-line ES-SCLC treatment. Improving the clinical benefits of individualized treatment for patients with ES-SCLC remains challenging. Challenges include identifying biomarkers for targeted therapy, exploring new treatments, developing new medicines, and classifying SCLC molecular subtypes. This review provides an in-depth analysis of research on first-line ES-SCLC treatment. Additionally, it discusses advances in ES-SCLC treatment.

Anlotinib as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Chemotherapy Combined with Consolidation Radiation for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer is sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but local recurrence and distant metastasis occur shortly after treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world value of anlotinib as a maintenance therapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) after first-line chemotherapy and consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (CTRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 150 patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line chemotherapy and CTRT from April 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. After the completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients received anlotinib according to their desire. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the first diagnosis, and the secondary endpoints were prognostic factors and safety.

RESULTS

The ORR and DCR of patients with ES-SCLC were 50.0% and 80.3%, respectively, in the anlotinib group and 42.9% and 69.0% in the no-maintenance therapy group. The 3-year OS rates were 27.6% and 12.6% in the anlotinib and observation groups (HR = 2.52, P = 0.003), and the median OS times were 23.8 months and 15.3 months. The 3-year PFS rates were 18.2% and 8.8% in the anlotinib and observation groups (HR = 1.76, P = 0.034) with median PFS times of 11.5 months and 8.8 months. After stratification on the basis of clinical response, patients who achieved CR plus PR after chemoradiotherapy had a longer median OS in the anlotinib and observation groups (34.0 months vs 24.8 months, HR = 2.40, P = 0.009). There were higher incidence rates of hand-foot syndrome (27.3% vs 10.5%, P = 0.001), gingival bleeding/hemoptysis (18.5% vs 4.8%, P = 0.015) and rash (33.3% vs 4.8%, P < 0.001) in the anlotinib group than in the observation group.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance therapy with anlotinib improved the survival of patients with ES-SCLC after first-line chemotherapy and CTRT. Owing to the small sample size of the real-world trial, the reliability of our study needs to be confirmed in more studies.

Small cell lung cancer with liver metastases: from underlying mechanisms to treatment strategies

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents an aggressive neuroendocrine (NE) tumor within the pulmonary region, characterized by very poor prognoses. Druggable targets for SCLC remain limited, thereby constraining treatment options available to patients. Immuno-chemotherapy has emerged as a pivotal therapeutic strategy for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), yet it fails to confer significant efficacy in cases involving liver metastases (LMs) originating from SCLC. Therefore, our attention is directed towards the challenging subset of SCLC patients with LMs. Disease progression of LM-SCLC patients is affected by various factors in the tumor microenvironment (TME), including immune cells, blood vessels, inflammatory mediators, metabolites, and NE substances. Beyond standard immuno-chemotherapy, ongoing efforts to manage LMs in SCLC encompass anti-angiogenic therapy, radiotherapy, microwave ablation (MWA) / radiofrequency ablation (RFA), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and systemic therapies in conjunction with local interventions. Prospective experimental and clinical investigations into SCLC should prioritize precise and individualized approaches to enhance the prognosis across distinct patient cohorts.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (AG regimen) combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Data of 52 patients with advanced PC who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China) between August 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, patients were divided into two groups, including 27 patients in the chemotherapy group (AG regimen) and 25 patients in the combined treatment group (AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The survival curves of the two groups were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors influencing prognosis.

RESULTS

The median OS and PFS in the combined treatment group were significantly longer than those in the chemotherapy group (OS, 12.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.005; PFS, 5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (32.0 % vs. 25.9 %, P = 0.629), and DCR in the combined treatment group was significantly better than that in the chemotherapy group (84.0 % vs. 59.3 %, P = 0.049). Grade 1-2 adverse reactions were predominant in both groups, and no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors exhibited to have a higher efficacy for the first-line treatment of advanced PC, and the adverse reactions were also controllable.

Anlotinib enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration via induction of CCL5 improves the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy in lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and requires effective treatment strategies. Recently, the development of a novel multiple-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, anlotinib, has drawn increasing attention, especially it shows advantages when combined with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. However, the mechanism by which anlotinib improves immunotherapy and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment remains unclear. In this study, we found that anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade significantly inhibited tumor growth and reduced tumor weight in a lung cancer xenograft model compared to any single treatment. Both immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analyses revealed that anlotinib induced a CD8+ T cell dominated tumor microenvironment, which might account for its improved role in immunotherapy. Further investigations showed that CCL5-mediated CD8+ T cell recruitment plays a critical role in anlotinib and PD-1 blockade strategies. The depletion of CD8+ T cells abrogated this process. In conclusion, our findings showed that the combination of anlotinib and PD-1 blockade produced promising effects in the treatment of lung cancer, and that the induction of CCL5-mediced CD8+ T cell recruitment by anlotinib provided a novel mechanism of action.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in 157 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: real-world evidence from a single-center retrospective study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the therapeutic options for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In this real-world study, we analyzed the treatment patterns in patients with ES-SCLC and evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy as first-line therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with ES-SCLC who received treatment at China-Japan Friendship Hospital (Beijing, China) between August 1, 2020, and April 30, 2023. The treatment patterns appeared in the form of Sunburst Chart and Sankey diagram. The survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

A total of 157 patients with ES-SCLC were retrospectively included. According to first-line therapy, patients were divided into the chemotherapy (CT) group (n=82) and chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) group (n=75). The median treatment lines were 2[1, 2] and cycles were 8[5, 12], respectively. 82 patients received the second line of therapy, followed by 37 for the third, 15 for the fourth, 11 for the fifth, and 5 for the sixth. Overall, the treatment patterns involved 11 options including 12 chemotherapy regimens, 11 ICIs, and 4 targeted agents. The second-line treatment pattern had the most options (9) and regimens (43). In the first 3 lines, chemotherapy was the largest proportion of treatment options. The addition of ICIs prolonged progression-free survival from 6.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.00-7.87) to 7.33 (95% CI, 6.03-9.80) months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.67, 95% CI, 0.47-0.95; P=0.025), overall survival from 12.97 (10.90-23.3) to 14.33 (12.67-NA) months without statistically significant difference (HR=0.86, 95% CI, 0.55-1.34; P=0.505).

Conclusion

The treatment options of patients with ES-SCLC are more diversified. Combination therapy is the current trend, where chemotherapy is the cornerstone. Meanwhile, ICIs participate in almost all lines of treatment. However, the clinical efficacy remains barely satisfactory. We are urgently expecting more breakthrough therapies except immunology will be applied in the clinic.

Histological transformation into SCLC: An important resistance mechanism of NSCLC upon immunotherapy

The phenomenon of histological transformation has been widely reported in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations following the failure of EGFR-TKI treatment. Recent evidence suggests that similar histological changes can also occur in advanced NSCLC without driver gene mutations after developing resistance to immunotherapy. In this review, it was found that 66.7% of cases with immunotherapy-induced histological transformation were classified as lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), while histological conversion into lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) without EGFR or ALK gene mutations has rarely been reported. There have been sporadic reports on the occurrence of mutual transformation between LUAD and LSCC. The histological conversion from NSCLC into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) appears to be significantly underestimated, likely due to the infrequency of re-biopsy following the development of immunotherapy resistance. Several studies have reported a close association between the transformation and mutations at TP53 and the RB1 splice site, as well as the loss of an FBXW7 mutation. However, the exact mechanisms underlying this conversion remain unclear. Currently, there is a lack of guidelines for the management of transformed SCLC from NSCLC following immunotherapy, with chemotherapy being the most commonly employed treatment approach.

Current status and future of anti-angiogenic drugs in lung cancer

Lung cancer, as a malignant tumor with both high incidence and mortality in China, is one of the major causes of death in our population and one of the major public health problems in China. Effective treatment of lung cancer is a major public health task for all human beings. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumor, not only as a basic condition for tumor growth, but also as a significant factor to promote tumor metastasis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become a vital means to inhibit tumor development, and anti-angiogenic drugs can rebalance pro- and anti-angiogenic factors to inhibit tumor cells. This article reviews the mechanism of blood vessel formation in tumor tissues and the mechanism of action of different anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anti-tumor drugs, and the mechanism of anti-angiogenic drug resistance.

Etoposide/platinum plus anlotinib for patients with transformed small-cell lung cancer from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma after EGFR-TKI resistance: a retrospective and observational study

Objective

The histological conversion of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) into small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an important resistance mechanism for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant LUAD. Anlotinib has been recommended as the third-line treatment for SCLC patients. The efficacy of etoposide/platinum (EP) as the main treatment is very limited for patients with transformed SCLC. However, little is known about EP plus anlotinib for transformed SCLC. The present study retrospectively explored the clinical response to EP combined with anlotinib in patients with transformed SCLC from LUAD after EGFR-TKI failure.

Methods

A total of 10 patients who underwent SCLC transformation from EGFR-TKI-resistant LUAD were retrospectively reviewed from September 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, in three regional hospitals. All of the patients were treated with the combination regimen of EP and anlotinib for four to six cycles, followed by anlotinib maintenance therapy. The clinical efficacy indices including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and toxicities were evaluated.

Results

The median time from EGFR-TKI treatment to SCLC conversion was 20.1 ± 2.76 months (17-24 months). Genetic examination after transformation showed that 90% of the patients retained their original EGFR gene mutations. Additional driver genes were found, including BRAF mutation (10%), PIK3CA mutation (20%), RB1 loss (50%), and TP53 mutation (60%). The ORR and DCR were 80% and 100%, respectively. The mPFS was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.1 months), and the mOS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 12.0-15.9 months). Less than 10% of grade 3 toxicities were observed, and no grade 4 toxicity and death events were reported.

Conclusion

The EP plus anlotinib regimen appears to be a promising and safe strategy in transformed SCLC patients after EGFR-TKI resistance, which warrants further investigation.