Why has permanent control of cassava brown streak disease in Sub-Saharan Africa remained a dream since the 1930s?

Twenty-eight years of GM Food and feed without harm: why not accept them?

Since the first genetically engineered or modified crops or organisms (GMO) were approved for commercial production in 1995, no new GMO has been proven to be a hazard or cause harm to human consumers. These modifications have improved crop efficiency, reduced losses to insect pests, reduced losses to viral and microbial plant pathogens and improved drought tolerance. A few have focused on nutritional improvements producing beta carotene in Golden Rice. Regulators in the United States and countries signing the CODEX Alimentarius and Cartagena Biosafety agreements have evaluated human and animal food safety considering potential risks of allergenicity, toxicity, nutritional and anti-nutritional risks. They consider risks for non-target organisms and the environment. There are no cases where post-market surveillance has uncovered harm to consumers or the environment including potential transfer of DNA from the GMO to non-target organisms. In fact, many GMOs have helped improve production, yield and reduced risks from chemical insecticides or fungicides. Yet there are generic calls to label foods containing any genetic modification as a GMO and refusing to allow GM events to be labeled as organic. Many African countries have accepted the Cartagena Protocol as a tool to keep GM events out of their countries while facing food insecurity. The rationale for those restrictions are not rational. Other issues related to genetic diversity, seed production and environmental safety must be addressed. What can be done to increase acceptance of safe and nutritious foods as the population increases, land for cultivation is reduced and energy costs soar?

Genetic analysis of cassava brown streak disease root necrosis using image analysis and genome-wide association studies

Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) poses a substantial threat to food security. To address this challenge, we used PlantCV to extract CBSD root necrosis image traits from 320 clones, with an aim of identifying genomic regions through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and candidate genes. Results revealed strong correlations among certain root necrosis image traits, such as necrotic area fraction and necrotic width fraction, as well as between the convex hull area of root necrosis and the percentage of necrosis. Low correlations were observed between CBSD scores obtained from the 1-5 scoring method and all root necrosis traits. Broad-sense heritability estimates of root necrosis image traits ranged from low to moderate, with the highest estimate of 0.42 observed for the percentage of necrosis, while narrow-sense heritability consistently remained low, ranging from 0.03 to 0.22. Leveraging data from 30,750 SNPs obtained through DArT genotyping, eight SNPs on chromosomes 1, 7, and 11 were identified and associated with both the ellipse eccentricity of root necrosis and the percentage of necrosis through GWAS. Candidate gene analysis in the 172.2kb region on the chromosome 1 revealed 24 potential genes with diverse functions, including ubiquitin-protein ligase, DNA-binding transcription factors, and RNA metabolism protein, among others. Despite our initial expectation that image analysis objectivity would yield better heritability estimates and stronger genomic associations than the 1-5 scoring method, the results were unexpectedly lower. Further research is needed to comprehensively understand the genetic basis of these traits and their relevance to cassava breeding and disease management.

Genetic dissection of cassava brown streak disease in a genomic selection population

Introduction

Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) is a major threat to food security in East and central Africa. Breeding for resistance against CBSD is the most economical and sustainable way of addressing this challenge.

Methods

This study seeks to assess the (1) performance of CBSD incidence and severity; (2) identify genomic regions associated with CBSD traits and (3) candidate genes in the regions of interest, in the Cycle 2 population of the National Crops Resources Research Institute.

Results

A total of 302 diverse clones were screened, revealing that CBSD incidence across growing seasons was 44%. Severity scores for both foliar and root symptoms ranged from 1.28 to 1.99 and 1.75 to 2.28, respectively across seasons. Broad sense heritability ranged from low to high (0.15 - 0.96), while narrow sense heritability ranged from low to moderate (0.03 - 0.61). Five QTLs, explaining approximately 19% phenotypic variation were identified for CBSD severity at 3 months after planting on chromosomes 1, 13, and 18 in the univariate GWAS analysis. Multivariate GWAS analysis identified 17 QTLs that were consistent with the univariate analysis including additional QTLs on chromosome 6. Seventy-seven genes were identified in these regions with functions such as catalytic activity, ATP-dependent activity, binding, response to stimulus, translation regulator activity, transporter activity among others.

Discussion

These results suggest variation in virulence in the C2 population, largely due to genetics and annotated genes in these QTLs regions may play critical roles in virus initiation and replication, thus increasing susceptibility to CBSD.

Cassava Brown Streak Viruses express second 6-kilodalton (6K2) protein with varied polarity and three dimensional (3D) structures: Basis for trait discrepancy between the virus species

Cassava Brown Streak Virus (CBSV) and Ugandan Cassava Brown Streak Virus (UCBSV) are the two among six virus species speculated to cause the most catastrophic Brown Streak Disease of Cassava (CBSD) in Africa and Asia. Cassava Brown Streak Virus (CBSV) is hard to breed resistance for compared to Ugandan Cassava Brown Streak Virus (UCBSV) species. This is exemplified by incidences of CBSV species rather than UCBSV species in elite breeding line, KBH 2006/0026 at Bagamoyo, Tanzania. It is not yet understood as to why CBSV species could breakdown CBSD-resistance in the KBH 2006/0026 unlike the UCBSV species. This marks the first in silico study conducted to understand molecular basis for the trait discrepancy between CBSV and UCBSV species from structural biology view point. Following ab initio modelling and analysis of physical-chemical properties of second 6-kilodalton (6K2) protein encoded by CBSV and UCBSV species, using ROBETTA server and Protein Parameters tool, respectively we report that; three dimensional (3D) structures and polarity of the protein differs significantly between the two virus species. (95% and 5%) and (85% and 15%) strains of 20 CBSV and 20 UCBSV species respectively, expressed the protein in homo-trimeric and homo-tetrameric forms, correspondingly. 95% and 85% of studied strain population of the two virus species expressed hydrophilic and hydrophobic 6K2, respectively. Based on findings of the curent study, we hypothesize that; (i) The hydrophilic 6K2 expressed by the CBSV species, favour its faster systemic movement via vascular tissues of cassava host and hence result into higher tissue titres than the UCBSV species encoding hydrophobic form of the protein. t and (ii) The hydrophilic 6K2 expressed byCBSV species have additional interaction advantage with Nuclear Inclusion b protease domain (NIb) and Viral genome-linked protein (VPg), components of Virus Replication Complex (VRC) and hence contributing to faster replication of viral genome than the hydrophobic 6K2 expressed by the UCBSV species. Experimental studies are needed to resolve the 3D structures of the 6K2, VPg and NIb and comprehend complex molecular interactions between them. We suggest that, the 6K2 gene should be targeted for improvement of RNA interference (RNAi)-directed transgenesis of virus-resistant cassava as a more effective way to control the CBSD besides breeding.