Differential protein-DNA contacts for activation and repression by ArgP, a LysR-type (LTTR) transcriptional regulator in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli CadB is capable of promiscuously transporting muropeptides and contributing to peptidoglycan recycling

The bacterial peptidoglycan (PG) cell wall is remodeled during growth and division, releasing fragments called muropeptides. Muropeptides can be internalized and reused in a process called PG recycling. Escherichia coli is highly devoted to recycling muropeptides and is known to have at least two transporters, AmpG and OppBCDF, that import them into the cytoplasm. While studying mutants lacking AmpG, we unintentionally isolated mutations that led to the altered expression of a third transporter, CadB. CadB is normally upregulated under acidic pH conditions and is an antiporter for lysine and cadaverine. Here, we explored if CadB was altering PG recycling to assist in the absence of AmpG. Surprisingly, CadB overexpression was able to restore PG recycling when both AmpG and OppBCDF were absent. CadB was found to import freed PG peptides, a subpopulation of muropeptides, through a promiscuous activity. Altogether, our data support that CadB is a third transporter capable of contributing to PG recycling. IMPORTANCE Bacteria produce a rigid mesh cell wall. During growth, the cell wall is remodeled, which releases cell wall fragments. If released into the extracellular environment, cell wall fragments can trigger inflammation by the immune system of a host. Gastrointestinal bacteria, like Escherichia coli, have dedicated pathways to recycle almost all cell wall fragments they produce. E. coli contains two known recycling transporters, AmpG and Opp, that we previously showed are optimized for growth in different environments. Here, we identify that a third transporter, CadB, can also contribute to cell wall recycling. This work expands our understanding of cell wall recycling and highlights the dedication of organisms like E. coli to ensure high recycling in multiple growth environments.

Toxin:antitoxin ratio sensing autoregulation of the Vibrio cholerae parDE2 module

The parDE family of toxin-antitoxin (TA) operons is ubiquitous in bacterial genomes and, in Vibrio cholerae, is an essential component to maintain the presence of chromosome II. Here, we show that transcription of the V. cholerae parDE2 (VcparDE) operon is regulated in a toxin:antitoxin ratio-dependent manner using a molecular mechanism distinct from other type II TA systems. The repressor of the operon is identified as an assembly with a 6:2 stoichiometry with three interacting ParD2 dimers bridged by two ParE2 monomers. This assembly docks to a three-site operator containing 5'- GGTA-3' motifs. Saturation of this TA complex with ParE2 toxin results in disruption of the interface between ParD2 dimers and the formation of a TA complex of 2:2 stoichiometry. The latter is operator binding-incompetent as it is incompatible with the required spacing of the ParD2 dimers on the operator.

The LysR-type transcription factor LsrB regulates beta-lactam resistance in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen, broadly known as the causal agent of the crown gall disease. The soil bacterium is naturally resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics by utilizing the inducible beta-lactamase AmpC. Our picture on the condition-dependent regulation of ampC expression is incomplete. A known regulator is AmpR controlling the transcription of ampC in response to unrecycled muropeptides as a signal for cell wall stress. In our study, we uncovered the global transcriptional regulator LsrB as a critical player acting upstream of AmpR. Deletion of lsrB led to severe ampicillin and penicillin sensitivity, which could be restored to wild-type levels by lsrB complementation. By transcriptome profiling via RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR and by electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show that ampD coding for an anhydroamidase involved in peptidoglycan recycling is under direct negative control by LsrB. Controlling AmpD levels by the LysR-type regulator in turn impacts the cytoplasmic concentration of cell wall degradation products and thereby the AmpR-mediated regulation of ampC. Our results substantially expand the existing model of inducible beta-lactam resistance in A. tumefaciens by establishing LsrB as higher-level transcriptional regulator.

Mechanisms and biotechnological applications of transcription factors

Transcription factors play an indispensable role in maintaining cellular viability and finely regulating complex internal metabolic networks. These crucial bioactive functions rely on their ability to respond to effectors and concurrently interact with binding sites. Recent advancements have brought innovative insights into the understanding of transcription factors. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the mechanisms by which transcription factors carry out their functions, along with calculation and experimental-based methods employed in their identification. Additionally, we highlight recent achievements in the application of transcription factors in various biotechnological fields, including cell engineering, human health, and biomanufacturing. Finally, the current limitations of research and provide prospects for future investigations are discussed. This review will provide enlightening theoretical guidance for transcription factors engineering.

Genomic footprinting uncovers global transcription factor responses to amino acids in Escherichia coli

Our knowledge of transcriptional responses to changes in nutrient availability comes primarily from few well-studied transcription factors (TFs), often lacking an unbiased genome-wide perspective. Leveraging recent advances allowing bacterial genomic footprinting, we comprehensively mapped the genome-wide regulatory responses of Escherichia coli to exogenous leucine, methionine, alanine, and lysine. The global TF Lrp was found to individually sense three amino acids and mount three different target gene responses. Overall, 531 genes had altered RNA polymerase occupancy, and 32 TFs responded directly or indirectly to the presence of amino acids, including regulators of membrane and osmotic pressure homeostasis. About 70% of the detected TF-DNA interactions had not been reported before. We thus identified 682 previously unknown TF-binding locations, for a subset of which the involved TFs were identified by affinity purification. This comprehensive map of amino acid regulation illustrates the incompleteness of the known transcriptional regulation network, even in E. coli.

Versatility and Complexity: Common and Uncommon Facets of LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulators

LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) form one of the largest families of bacterial regulators. They are widely distributed and contribute to all aspects of metabolism and physiology. Most are homotetramers, with each subunit composed of an N-terminal DNA-binding domain followed by a long helix connecting to an effector-binding domain. LTTRs typically bind DNA in the presence or absence of a small-molecule ligand (effector). In response to cellular signals, conformational changes alter DNA interactions, contact with RNA polymerase, and sometimes contact with other proteins. Many are dual-function repressor-activators, although different modes of regulation may occur at multiple promoters. This review presents an update on the molecular basis of regulation, the complexity of regulatory schemes, and applications in biotechnology and medicine. The abundance of LTTRs reflects their versatility and importance. While a single regulatory model cannot describe all family members, a comparison of similarities and differences provides a framework for future study.

LysR-type transcriptional regulators: state of the art

The LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) are DNA-binding proteins present in bacteria, archaea, and in algae. Knowledge about their distribution, abundance, evolution, structural organization, transcriptional regulation, fundamental roles in free life, pathogenesis, and bacteria-plant interaction has been generated. This review focuses on these aspects and provides a current picture of LTTR biology.

Separation and Characterization of Protein-DNA Complexes by EMSA and In-Gel Footprinting

In-gel footprinting enables the precise identification of protein binding sites on the DNA after separation of free and protein-bound DNA molecules by gel electrophoresis in native conditions and subsequent digestion by the nuclease activity of the 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion [(OP)₂-Cu⁺] within the gel matrix. Hence, the technique combines the resolving power of protein-DNA complexes in the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) with the precision of target site identification by chemical footprinting. This approach is particularly well suited to characterize distinct molecular assemblies in a mixture of protein-DNA complexes and to identify individual binding sites within composite operators, when the concentration-dependent occupation of binding sites, with a different affinity, results in the generation of complexes with a distinct stoichiometry and migration velocity in gel electrophoresis.

Mining RNA-seq data reveals the massive regulon of GcvB small RNA and its physiological significance in maintaining amino acid homeostasis in Escherichia coli

Bacterial small RNAs regulate the expression of multiple genes through imperfect base-pairing with target mRNAs mediated by RNA chaperone proteins such as Hfq. GcvB is the master sRNA regulator of amino acid metabolism and transport in a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria. Recently, independent RNA-seq approaches identified a plethora of transcripts interacting with GcvB in Escherichia coli. In this study, the compilation of RIL-seq, CLASH, and MAPS data sets allowed us to identify GcvB targets with high accuracy. We validated 21 new GcvB targets repressed at the posttranscriptional level, raising the number of direct targets to >50 genes in E. coli. Among its multiple seed sequences, GcvB utilizes either R1 or R3 to regulate most of these targets. Furthermore, we demonstrated that both R1 and R3 seed sequences are required to fully repress the expression of gdhA, cstA, and sucC genes. In contrast, the ilvLXGMEDA polycistronic mRNA is targeted by GcvB through at least four individual binding sites in the mRNA. Finally, we revealed that GcvB is involved in the susceptibility of peptidase-deficient E. coli strain (Δpeps) to Ala-Gln dipeptide by regulating both Dpp dipeptide importer and YdeE dipeptide exporter via R1 and R3 seed sequences, respectively.

Chemical Protection and Premodification-Binding Interference for the Identification of Phosphate and Base-Specific Contacts in Protein-DNA Complexes

The specificity and strength of protein-DNA complexes rely on tight interactions between side- and main chain atoms of amino acid residues and phosphates, sugars, and base-specific groups. Various (in-gel) footprinting methods (for more information, see Chapter 11 ) allow the identification of the global-binding region but do not provide details on the contribution to complex formation of individual sequence-specific constituents of the DNA-binding site. Here, we describe how various chemicals can be used to randomly and sparingly modify specific bases or phosphates and allow the identification of those residues that are specifically protected against modification upon protein binding (protection studies) or interfere with complex formation when modified or removed prior to protein binding (premodification-binding interference). Each one of these complementary approaches has its advantages and shortcomings and results have to be interpreted with caution, having in mind the precise chemistry of the modification. However, used in combination, these methods provide an accurate and high-resolution image of the protein-DNA contacts.

The LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator BsrA (PA2121) Controls Vital Metabolic Pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a facultative human pathogen causing nosocomial infections, has complex regulatory systems involving many transcriptional regulators. LTTR (LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator) family proteins are involved in the regulation of various processes, including stress responses, motility, virulence, and amino acid metabolism. The aim of this study was to characterize the LysR-type protein BsrA (PA2121), previously described as a negative regulator of biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa. Genome wide identification of BsrA binding sites using chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing analysis revealed 765 BsrA-bound regions in the P. aeruginosa PAO1161 genome, including 367 sites in intergenic regions. The motif T-N₁₁-A was identified within sequences bound by BsrA. Transcriptomic analysis showed altered expression of 157 genes in response to BsrA excess; of these, 35 had a BsrA binding site within their promoter regions, suggesting a direct influence of BsrA on the transcription of these genes. BsrA-repressed loci included genes encoding proteins engaged in key metabolic pathways such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The panel of loci possibly directly activated by BsrA included genes involved in pilus/fimbria assembly, as well as secretion and transport systems. In addition, DNA pull-down and regulatory analyses showed the involvement of PA2551, PA3398, and PA5189 in regulation of bsrA expression, indicating that this gene is part of an intricate regulatory network. Taken together, these findings reveal the existence of a BsrA regulon, which performs important functions in P. aeruginosa.

IMPORTANCE This study shows that BsrA, a LysR-type transcriptional regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, previously identified as a repressor of biofilm synthesis, is part of an intricate global regulatory network. BsrA acts directly and/or indirectly as the repressor and/or activator of genes from vital metabolic pathways (e.g., pyruvate, acetate, and tricarboxylic acid cycle) and is involved in control of transport functions and the formation of surface appendages. Expression of the bsrA gene is increased in the presence of antibiotics, which suggests its induction in response to stress, possibly reflecting the need to redirect metabolism under stressful conditions. This is particularly relevant for the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa. In summary, the findings of this study demonstrate that the BsrA regulator performs important roles in carbon metabolism, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa.

Entropic pressure controls the oligomerization of the Vibrio cholerae ParD2 antitoxin

ParD2 is the antitoxin component of the parDE2 toxin-antitoxin module from Vibrio cholerae and consists of an ordered DNA-binding domain followed by an intrinsically disordered ParE-neutralizing domain. In the absence of the C-terminal intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) domain, V. cholerae ParD2 (VcParD2) crystallizes as a doughnut-shaped hexadecamer formed by the association of eight dimers. This assembly is stabilized via hydrogen bonds and salt bridges rather than by hydrophobic contacts. In solution, oligomerization of the full-length protein is restricted to a stable, open decamer or dodecamer, which is likely to be a consequence of entropic pressure from the IDP tails. The relative positioning of successive VcParD2 dimers mimics the arrangement of Streptococcus agalactiae CopG dimers on their operator and allows an extended operator to wrap around the VcParD2 oligomer.

Peptidoglycan Sensing Prevents Quiescence and Promotes Quorum-Independent Colony Growth of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the leading cause of human urinary tract infections (UTIs), and many patients experience recurrent infection after successful antibiotic treatment. The source of recurrent infections may be persistent bacterial reservoirs in vivo that are in a quiescent state and thus are not susceptible to antibiotics. Here, we show that multiple UPEC strains require a quorum to proliferate in vitro with glucose as the carbon source. At low cell density, the bacteria remain viable but enter a quiescent, nonproliferative state. Of the clinical UPEC isolates tested to date, 35% (51/145) enter this quiescent state, including isolates from the recently emerged, multidrug-resistant pandemic lineage ST131 (i.e., strain JJ1886) and isolates from the classic endemic lineage ST73 (i.e., strain CFT073). Moreover, quorum-dependent UPEC quiescence is prevented and reversed by small-molecule proliferants that stimulate colony formation. These proliferation cues include d-amino acid-containing peptidoglycan (PG) tetra- and pentapeptides, as well as high local concentrations of l-lysine and l-methionine. Peptidoglycan fragments originate from the peptidoglycan layer that supports the bacterial cell wall but are released as bacteria grow. These fragments are detected by a variety of organisms, including human cells, other diverse bacteria, and, as we show here for the first time, UPEC. Together, these results show that for UPEC, (i) sensing of PG stem peptide and uptake of l-lysine modulate the quorum-regulated decision to proliferate and (ii) quiescence can be prevented by both intra- and interspecies PG peptide signaling.IMPORTANCE Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the leading cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs). During pathogenesis, UPEC cells adhere to and infiltrate bladder epithelial cells, where they may form intracellular bacterial communities (IBCs) or enter a nongrowing or slowly growing quiescent state. Here, we show in vitro that UPEC strains at low population density enter a reversible, quiescent state by halting division. Quiescent cells resume proliferation in response to sensing a quorum and detecting external signals, or cues, including peptidoglycan tetra- and pentapeptides.

Characterization of the pleiotropic LysR-type transcription regulator LeuO of Escherichia coli

LeuO is a pleiotropic LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) and co-regulator of the abundant nucleoid-associated repressor protein H-NS in Gammaproteobacteria. As other LTTRs, LeuO is a tetramer that is formed by dimerization of the N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD) and C-terminal effector-binding domain (EBD). To characterize the Escherichia coli LeuO protein, we screened for LeuO mutants that activate the cas (CRISPR-associated/Cascade) promoter more effectively than wild-type LeuO. This yielded nine mutants carrying amino acid substitutions in the dimerization interface of the regulatory EBD, as shown by solving the EBD’s crystal structure. Superimposing of the crystal structures of LeuO-EBD and LeuO-S120D-EBD suggests that the Ser120 to Asp substitution triggers a structural change that is related to effector-induced structural changes of LTTRs. Corresponding functional analyses demonstrated that LeuO-S120D has a higher DNA-binding affinity than wild-type LeuO. Further, a palindromic DNA-binding core-site and a consensus sequence were identified by DNase I footprinting with LeuO-S120D as well as with the dimeric DBD. The data suggest that LeuO-S120D mimics an effector-induced form of LeuO regulating a distinct set of target loci. In general, constitutive mutants and determining the DNA-binding specificity of the DBD-dimer are feasible approaches to characterize LTTRs of unknown function.

Diversity, versatility and complexity of bacterial gene regulation mechanisms: opportunities and drawbacks for applications in synthetic biology

Gene expression occurs in two essential steps: transcription and translation. In bacteria, the two processes are tightly coupled in time and space, and highly regulated. Tight regulation of gene expression is crucial. It limits wasteful consumption of resources and energy, prevents accumulation of potentially growth inhibiting reaction intermediates, and sustains the fitness and potential virulence of the organism in a fluctuating, competitive and frequently stressful environment. Since the onset of studies on regulation of enzyme synthesis, numerous distinct regulatory mechanisms modulating transcription and/or translation have been discovered. Mostly, various regulatory mechanisms operating at different levels in the flow of genetic information are used in combination to control and modulate the expression of a single gene or operon. Here, we provide an extensive overview of the very diverse and versatile bacterial gene regulatory mechanisms with major emphasis on their combined occurrence, intricate intertwinement and versatility. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of well-characterized basal expression and regulatory elements in synthetic biology applications, where they may ensure orthogonal, predictable and tunable expression of (heterologous) target genes and pathways, aiming at a minimal burden for the host.

Competitive Repression of the artPIQM Operon for Arginine and Ornithine Transport by Arginine Repressor and Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein in Escherichia coli

Two out of the three major uptake systems for arginine in Escherichia coli are encoded by the artJ-artPIQM gene cluster. ArtJ is the high-affinity periplasmic arginine-specific binding protein (ArgBP-I), whereas artI encodes the arginine and ornithine periplasmic binding protein (AO). Both ArtJ and ArtI are supposed to combine with the inner membrane-associated ArtQMP₂ transport complex of the ATP-binding cassette-type (ABC). Transcription of artJ is repressed by arginine repressor (ArgR) and the artPIQM operon is regulated by the transcriptional regulators ArgR and Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Whereas repression by ArgR requires arginine as corepressor, repression of P_artP by Lrp is partially counteracted by leucine, its major effector molecule. We demonstrate that binding of dimeric Lrp to the artP control region generates four complexes with a distinct migration velocity, and that leucine has an effect on both global binding affinity and cooperativity in the binding. We identify the binding sites for Lrp in the artP control region, reveal interferences in the binding of ArgR and Lrp in vitro and demonstrate that the two transcription factors act as competitive repressors in vivo, each one being a more potent regulator in the absence of the other. This competitive behavior may be explained by the partial steric overlap of their respective binding sites. Furthermore, we demonstrate ArgR binding to an unusual position in the control region of the lrp gene, downstream of the transcription initiation site. From this unusual position for an ArgR-specific operator, ArgR has little direct effect on lrp expression, but interferes with the negative leucine-sensitive autoregulation exerted by Lrp. Direct arginine and ArgR-dependent repression of lrp could be observed with a 25-bp deletion mutant, in which the ArgR binding site was artificially moved to a position immediately downstream of the lrp transcription initiation site. This finding is reminiscent of a previous observation made for the carAB operon encoding carbamoylphosphate synthase, where ArgR bound in overlap with the downstream promoter P2 does not block transcription initiated 67 bp upstream at the P1 promoter, and further supports the hypothesis that ArgR does not act as an efficient roadblock.

DbdR, a New Member of the LysR Family of Transcriptional Regulators, Coordinately Controls Four Promoters in the Thauera aromatica AR-1 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoate Anaerobic Degradation Pathway

The facultative anaerobe Thauera aromatica strain AR-1 uses 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate (3,5-DHB) as a sole carbon and energy source under anoxic conditions using an unusual oxidative strategy to overcome aromatic ring stability. A 25-kb gene cluster organized in four main operons encodes the anaerobic degradation pathway for this aromatic. The dbdR gene coding for a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR), which is present at the foremost end of the cluster, is required for anaerobic growth on 3,5-DHB and for the expression of the main pathway operons. A model structure of DbdR showed conserved key residues for effector binding with its closest relative TsaR for p-toluenesulfonate degradation. We found that DbdR controlled expression of three promoters upstream from the operons coding for the three main steps of the pathway. While one of them (P _orf20 ) was only active in the presence of 3,5-DHB, the other two (P _dbhL and P _orf18 ) showed moderate basal levels that were further induced in the presence of the pathway substrate, which needed be converted to hydroxyhydroquinone to activate transcription. Both basal and induced activities were strictly dependent on DbdR, which was also required for transcription from its own promoter. DbdR basal expression was moderately high and, unlike most LTTR, increased 2-fold in response to the presence of the effector. DbdR was found to be a tetramer in solution, producing a single retardation complex in binding assays with the three enzymatic promoters, consistent with its tetrameric structure. The three promoters had a conserved organization with a clear putative primary (regulatory) binding site and a putative secondary (activating) binding site positioned at the expected distances from the transcription start site. In contrast, two protein-DNA complexes were observed for the P _dbdR promoter, which also showed significant sequence divergence from those of the three other promoters. Taken together, our results show that a single LTTR coordinately controls expression of the entire 3,5-DHB anaerobic degradation pathway in Thauera aromatica AR-1, allowing a fast and optimized response to the presence of the aromatic.IMPORTANCE Thauera aromatica AR-1 is a facultative anaerobe that is able to use 3,5-dihydroxybenzoat (3,5-DHB) as the sole carbon and energy source in a process that is dependent on nitrate respiration. We have shown that a single LysR-type regulator with unusual properties, DbdR, controls the expression of the pathway in response to the presence of the substrate; unlike other regulators of the family, DbdR does not repress but activates its own synthesis and is able to bind and activate three promoters directing the synthesis of the pathway enzymes. The promoter architecture is conserved among the three promoters but deviates from that of typical LTTR-dependent promoters. The substrate must be metabolized to an intermediate compound to activate transcription, which requires basal enzyme levels to always be present. The regulatory network present in this strain is designed to allow basal expression of the enzymatic machinery, which would rapidly metabolize the substrate when exposed to it, thus rendering the effector molecule. Once activated, the regulator induces the synthesis of the entire pathway through a positive feedback, increasing expression from all the target promoters to allow maximum growth.