Comparison between MALDI-TOF MS and FilmArray Blood Culture Identification panel for rapid identification of yeast from positive blood culture

Performance of molecular tests for diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the clinical setting: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens and associated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles by molecular tests from positive blood cultures (PBCs) have the potential to improve patient management and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of molecular tests from PBCs for detecting pathogens and AMR in the clinical setting.

METHODS

.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane, conference proceedings, and study bibliographies were searched.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies evaluating DTA of commercially available molecular tests vs. traditional phenotypic identification and susceptibility testing methods in patients with PBCs were eligible.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with PBCs.

TESTS

Commercially available molecular tests.

REFERENCE STANDARD

Traditional phenotypic identification and susceptibility testing methods (standard of care, SOC).

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Summary DTA outcomes were estimated using bivariate random-effects models for gram-negative bacteria (GNB), gram-positive bacteria (GPB), yeast, GNB-AMR, GPB-AMR, and specific targets when reported by ≥ 2 studies (PROSPERO CRD42023488057).

RESULTS

Seventy-four studies including 24 590 samples were analysed, most of which had a low risk of bias. When compared with SOC, molecular tests showed 92-99% sensitivity, 99-100% specificity, 99-100% positive predictive value, and 97-100% negative predictive value for identifying total GNB (43 studies), GPB (38 studies), yeast (24 studies), GNB-AMR (35 studies), and GPB-AMR (39 studies). For individual pathogen targets, 93-100% sensitivity, 98-100% specificity, 86-100% positive predictive value, and 99-100% negative predictive value were estimated. Five of seven AMR genes had 91-99% sensitivity and 99-100% specificity. Sensitivity was lower for IMP (four studies; 62%; 95% CI, 34-83%) and VIM (four studies; 70%; 95% CI, 38-90%) carbapenemases, where genes were not detected or were not harboured in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (i.e. low prevalence). Performance of molecular tests in detecting AMR was generally comparable when grouped by geographical region (Europe, North America, and East Asia).

DISCUSSION

High DTA support the use of molecular tests in identifying a broad panel of pathogens and detecting AMR in GNB and GPB.

Diagnostic efficiency of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction. The FilmArray blood culture identification panel (BCID) panel is a multiplex PCR assay with high sensitivity and specificity to identify the most common pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs).Hypothesis. We hypothesize that the BCID panel has good diagnostic performance for BSIs and can be popularized in clinical application.Aim: To provide summarized evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of the BCID panel for the identification of positive blood cultures.Methodology. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through March 2021 and assessed the efficacy of the diagnostic test of the BCID panel. We performed a meta-analysis and calculated the summary sensitivity and specificity of the BCID panel. Systematic review protocols were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021239176).Results. A total of 16 full-text articles were eligible for analysis. The overall sensitivities of the BCID panel on Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi were 97 % (95 % CI, 0.96-0.98), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.98-01.00) and 99 % (95 % CI, 0.87-1.00), respectively. The pooled diagnostic specificities were 99 % (95 % CI, 0.97-1.00), 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) and 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, respectively.Conclusions. The BCID panel has high rule-in value for the early detection of BSI patients. The BCID panel can still provide valuable information for ruling out bacteremia or fungemia in populations with low pretest probability.

Determination of Pathogens by Electrophoretic and Spectrometric Techniques

In modern medical diagnostics, where analytical chemistry plays a key role, fast and accurate identification of pathogens is becoming increasingly important. Infectious diseases pose a growing threat to public health due to population growth, international air travel, bacterial resistance to antibiotics, and other factors. For instance, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patient samples is a key tool to monitor the spread of the disease. While there are several techniques for identifying pathogens by their genetic code, most of these methods are too expensive or slow to effectively analyze clinical and environmental samples that may contain hundreds or even thousands of different microbes. Standard approaches (e.g., culture media and biochemical assays) are known to be very time- and labor-intensive. The purpose of this review paper is to highlight the problems associated with the analysis and identification of pathogens that cause many serious infections. Special attention was paid to the description of mechanisms and the explanation of the phenomena and processes occurring on the surface of pathogens as biocolloids (charge distribution). This review also highlights the importance of electromigration techniques and demonstrates their potential for pathogen pre-separation and fractionation and demonstrates the use of spectrometric methods, such as MALDI-TOF MS, for their detection and identification.

Sensitivity and Specificity of a Novel Colony Characteristic for Determination of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Purpose: To assess colony morphology of Staphylococcus aureus isolates for target shape (T1) and its utility in the identification of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).

Methods: Staphylococcus species isolated from blood cultures were studied for colony morphology characteristics. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was performed on positive blood culture bottles for the detection of S. aureus and methicillin resistance. Colony morphology was read at 24 and 48 hours and defined as follows: target shaped (T1) - an elevated colony center encircled by a pale zone, which is surrounded by a single ring of peripheral enhancement giving a ‘target’ appearance; dome-shaped (T2) with an elevated center lacking the ‘target’ appearance.

Results: At 48 hours, 73.7% of MRSA and 59.5% of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) showed T1 morphology. T1 morphology has a sensitivity of 73.68% and specificity of 93.55% amongst S. aureus for identification of methicillin resistance and a high positive predictive value (95.45%) at 48 hours.

Conclusion: T1 morphology has a modest sensitivity with specificity and positive predictive value amongst S. aureus for identification of methicillin resistance at 48 hours. It can be potentially used for the identification of MRSA, especially in resource-limited settings and wherein a molecular test is not repeated if PCR testing has already identified methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) on a recent specimen on the same patient.

Identification of microorganisms directly from blood culture bottles with polymicrobial growth: comparison of FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are related to high mortality and morbidity. Rapid administration of effective antimicrobial treatment is crucial for patient survival. Recently developed rapid methods to identify pathogens directly from blood culture bottles speed up diagnosis of BSIs. The present study compares the performance of two rapid identification methods, FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS, on identifying microorganisms directly from positive blood culture bottles with polymicrobial growth. FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS were performed directly on positive clinical and simulated polymicrobial blood culture bottles. Assay results were compared with standard culture methods. In total, 110 polymicrobial blood culture samples, of which 96 samples contained two microorganisms while 14 samples contained three microorganisms, were studied. FilmArray was able to identify 215/234 (92.0%) of isolates detected by the standard culture method and successfully identified all microorganisms in 88/110 (80.0%) of blood culture bottles. In contrast, direct MALDI-TOF MS was only able to identify 65/234 (27.8%) of isolates and managed to identify all microoganisms in 2/110 (2.1%) of blood culture bottles. FilmArray is a rapid method for direct identification of polymicrobial blood culture samples that can complement the conventional identification methods. Direct MALDI-TOF MS has low performance with polymicrobial samples.

Comparison of the Fully Automated FilmArray BCID Assay to a 4-Hour Culture Test Coupled to Mass Spectrometry for Day 0 Identification of Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid bacterial identification of positive blood culture is important for adapting the antimicrobial therapy in patients with blood stream infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the multiplex FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) assay by comparison to an in-house protocol based on MALDI-TOF MS identification of microcolonies after a 4-hour culture, for identifying on the same day the microorganisms present in positive blood culture bottles. One hundred and fifty-three positive bottles from 123 patients were tested prospectively by the 3 techniques of bacterial identification: 11 bottles yielding negative results by the 3 tests were considered false positive (7.2%). The reference MALDI-TOF MS technique identified 134 monomicrobial (87.6%) and 8 double infections (5.2%), which resulted in a total of 150 microorganisms. Globally, 137 (91.3%) of these 150 pathogens were correctly identified by the fully automated multiplex FilmArray BCID system at the species or genus level on day of growth detection, versus 117 (78.8%) by MALDI-TOF MS identification on nascent microcolonies after a 4-hour culture (P < 0.01). By combining the two approaches, 140 (93.5%) of the positive bottles were identified successfully at day 0. These results confirm the excellent sensitivity of the FilmArray BCID assay, notably in case of multimicrobial infection. Due to the limited number of targets included into the test, it must be coupled to another identification strategy, as that presented in this study relying on MALDI-TOF MS identification of microcolonies obtained after a very short culture period.

A review of novel technologies and techniques associated with identification of bloodstream infection etiologies and rapid antimicrobial genotypic and quantitative phenotypic determination

INTRODUCTION

The antimicrobial aspect of management of patients with blood stream infections (BSI) and sepsis is time critical. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, rapid detection and identification of bacteria with antimicrobial susceptibility is crucial to direct therapy early in the course of illness. Molecular techniques offer a potential solution to this. Areas covered: In the present review the authors have discussed a number of novel solutions utilizing a variety of molecular techniques for pathogen detection, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility. The review is not designed to be an exhaustive literature review covering all diagnostic solutions ever developed, instead the authors have focused on what they have had experience using, evaluating or currently view as new and exciting with potential to revolutionize BSI diagnosis. The authors searched PubMed (Medline) and Google Scholar with terms: BSI, Bacteraemia, Candidaemia, Diagnostics, AST, Rapid, AMR, Novel and Blood Culture. The authors attended recent clinical microbiology technology congresses. Expert commentary: There are multiple exciting novel technologies at differing stages of development with potential to revolutionize diagnosis of BSI. More work is needed as well as a standardized assessment of different platforms in order to better understand the clinical and financial impacts these will have in clinical microbiology laboratories.

An Improved In-house MALDI-TOF MS Protocol for Direct Cost-Effective Identification of Pathogens from Blood Cultures

Background: Bloodstream infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients worldwide. Delays in the identification of microorganisms often leads to a poor prognosis. The application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) directly to blood culture (BC) broth can potentially identify bloodstream infections earlier, and facilitate timely management.

Methods: We developed an “in-house” (IH) protocol for direct MALDI-TOF MS based identification of organisms in positive BCs. The IH protocol was initially evaluated and improved with spiked BC samples, and its performance was compared with the commercial Sepsityper™ kit using both traditional and modified cut-off values. We then studied in parallel the performance of the IH protocol and the colony MS identifications in positive clinical BC samples using only modified cut-off values. All discrepancies were investigated by “gold standard” of gene sequencing.

Results: In 54 spiked BC samples, the IH method showed comparable results with Sepsityper™ after applying modified cut-off values. Specifically, accurate species and genus level identification was achieved in 88.7 and 3.9% of all the clinical monomicrobial BCs (284/301, 94.4%), respectively. The IH protocol exhibited superior performance for Gram negative bacteria than for Gram positive bacteria (92.8 vs. 82.4%). For anaerobes and yeasts, accurate species identification was achieved in 80.0 and 90.0% of the cases, respectively. For polymicrobial cultures (17/301, 5.6%), MALDI-TOF MS correctly identified a single species present in all the polymicrobial BCs under the Standard mode, while using the MIXED method, two species were correctly identified in 52.9% of the samples. Comparisons based on BC bottle type, showed that the BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F culture vials performed the best.

Conclusion: Our study provides a novel and effective sample preparation method for MALDI-TOF MS direct identification of pathogens from positive BC vials, with a lower cost ($1.5 vs. $ 7) albeit a slightly more laborious extracting process (an extra 15 min) compared with Sepsityper™ kit.

Identification and susceptibility testing of Candida spp. directly from yeast-positive blood cultures with Vitek 2

Culture-based identification and antifungal susceptibility take 48-72hours after positivity. We analyzed the performance of Vitek2 directly from 40 yeast-positive blood-cultures; agreement of 100% was observed for the tested antifungals; identification showed the same species in 31/40. The method reduces time (13 to 18h) for preliminary results.

Performance of the FilmArray Blood culture identification panel in positive blood culture bottles and cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of sepsis and meningitis

Sepsis and meningitis are life threatening medical conditions. Culture-based methods are used for identification of the causative pathogens, but they can be improved by implementation of additional test systems. We evaluated the performance of the novel FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID; Biofire Diagnostics) panel for rapid and accurate identification of microorganisms in positive blood cultures and additionally, in this cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pilot study for direct testing of CSF. A total of 107 positive blood cultures and 20 CSF samples (positive and negative) were investigated and compared to the routine procedures. Of the 107 positive blood cultures, 90.7% (97/107) showed monomicrobial growth and 9.3% (10/107) polymicrobial growth. The FilmArray BCID panel covered 89.3% (25/28) of the bacteria and 100% (2/2) of the yeasts found in this study and accurately identified all of them. From the 20 retrospective analyzed CSF, in 9 positive specimens 6 different bacterial species were identified. Discrepant identification results were found in 25% (5/20) and a low sensitivity of 50% (95% CI of 15.7% to 84.3%) was detected. Our study confirms the FilmArray BCID panel as a rapid, easy to handle PCR system with a good performance in positive blood cultures without Gram-staining result. However, our results additionally suggest that the system is not useful for direct CSF testing due to poor sensitivity.

Performance assessment of two lysis methods for direct identification of yeasts from clinical blood cultures using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

In cases of fungal infection of the bloodstream, rapid species identification is crucial to provide adapted therapy and thereby ameliorate patient outcome. Currently, the commercial Sepsityper kit and the sodium-dodecyl sulfate (SDS) method coupled with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry are the most commonly reported lysis protocols for direct identification of fungi from positive blood culture vials. However, the performance of these two protocols has never been compared on clinical samples. Accordingly, we performed a two-step survey on two distinct panels of clinical positive blood culture vials to identify the most efficient protocol, establish an appropriate log score (LS) cut-off, and validate the best method. We first compared the performance of the Sepsityper and the SDS protocols on 71 clinical samples. For 69 monomicrobial samples, mass spectrometry LS values were significantly higher with the SDS protocol than with the Sepsityper method (P < .0001), especially when the best score of four deposited spots was considered. Next, we established the LS cut-off for accurate identification at 1.7, based on specimen DNA sequence data. Using this LS cut-off, 66 (95.6%) and 46 (66.6%) isolates were correctly identified at the species level with the SDS and the Sepsityper protocols, respectively. In the second arm of the survey, we validated the SDS protocol on an additional panel of 94 clinical samples. Ninety-two (98.9%) of 93 monomicrobial samples were correctly identified at the species level (median LS = 2.061). Overall, our data suggest that the SDS method yields more accurate species identification of yeasts, than the Sepsityper protocol.

Optimized Use of the MALDI BioTyper System and the FilmArray BCID Panel for Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Cultures

Despite the current reliance on blood cultures (BCs), the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be sped up using new technologies performed directly on positive BC bottles. Two methods (the MALDI BioTyper system and FilmArray blood culture identification [BCID] panel) are potentially applicable. In this study, we performed a large-scale clinical evaluation (1,585 microorganisms from 1,394 BSI episodes) on the combined use of the MALDI BioTyper and FilmArray BCID panel compared to a reference (culture-based) method. As a result, the causative organisms of 97.7% (1,362/1,394) of the BSIs were correctly identified by our MALDI BioTyper and FilmArray BCID-based algorithm. Specifically, 65 (5.3%) out of 1,223 monomicrobial BCs that provided incorrect or invalid identifications with the MALDI BioTyper were accurately detected by the FilmArray BCID panel; additionally, 153 (89.5%) out of 171 polymicrobial BCs achieved complete identification with the FilmArray BCID panel. Conversely, full use of the MALDI BioTyper would have resulted in the identification of only 1 causative organism in 97/171 (56.7%) of the polymicrobial cultures. By applying our diagnostic algorithm, the median time to identification was shortened (19.5 h versus 41.7 h with the reference method; P < 0.001), and the minimized use of the FilmArray BCID panel led to a significant cost savings. Twenty-six out of 31 microorganisms that could not be identified were species/genera not designed to be detected with the FilmArray BCID panel, indicating that subculture was not dispensable for a few of our BSI episodes. In summary, the fast and effective testing of BC bottles is realistically adoptable in the clinical microbiology laboratory workflow, although the usefulness of this testing for the management of BSIs remains to be established.

The epidemiology and diagnosis of invasive candidiasis among premature infants

Invasive candidiasis is a leading infectious cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants. Improved recognition of modifiable risk factors and antifungal prophylaxis has contributed to the recent decline in the incidence of this infection among infants. Invasive candidiasis typically occurs in the first 6 weeks of life and presents with nonspecific signs of sepsis. Definitive diagnosis relies on the growth of Candida in blood culture or cultures from other normally sterile sites, but this may identify fewer than half of cases. Improved diagnostics are needed to guide the initiation of antifungal therapy in premature infants.

Blood culture-based diagnosis of bacteraemia: state of the art

Blood culture remains the best approach to identify the incriminating microorganisms when a bloodstream infection is suspected, and to guarantee that the antimicrobial treatment is adequate. Major improvements have been made in the last years to increase the sensitivity and specificity and to reduce the time to identification of microorganisms recovered from blood cultures. Among other factors, the introduction in clinical microbiology laboratories of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry technology revolutionized the identification of microorganisms whereas the introduction of nucleic-acid-based methods, such as DNA hybridization or rapid PCR-based test, significantly reduce the time to results. Together with traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing, new rapid methods for the detection of resistance mechanisms respond to major epidemiological concerns such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase or carbapenemases. This review presents and discusses the recent developments in microbial diagnosis of bloodstream infections based on blood cultures.

Prospective assessment of FilmArray® technology for the rapid identification of yeast isolated from blood cultures

We prospectively assessed the ability of FilmArray® device to identify fungal species involved in bloodstream infections. It succeeded in identifying 85.7% of isolates. The automated readout of results enabled the rapid initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. Thus, FilmArray® appeared as a reliable alternative diagnostic method for the most common yeast-like species.