Biochemical demonstration of mu-opioid receptor association with Gsalpha: enhancement following morphine exposure

De novo expression of neuropeptide Y in sensory neurons does not contribute to peripheral neuropathic pain

Nerve damage induces a robust de novo expression of the pain-modulatory peptide neuropeptide Y (NPY) in large-diameter primary afferent neurons that innervate the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and the dorsal column nuclei. To determine whether this functions to modulate peripheral neuropathic pain in male and female mice, we selectively deleted the Npy gene in neurons of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), without disruption of its expression in brain or dorsal horn neurons. We then subjected sensory neuron-specific NPY deletion mutant mice (Pirt-NPY) and their wild-type controls to either sham surgery, spared sural nerve injury (SNI) or spared tibial nerve injury (tSNI). Conditional Npy deletion did not change the severity or duration of static mechanical, dynamic mechanical, or cold allodynia in SNI or tSNI models, nor ongoing neuropathic pain as assessed with conditioned place preference to gabapentin. When injected after the resolution of tSNI-induced mechanical hypersensitivity (a latent pain sensitization model of chronic neuropathic pain), the NPY Y1 receptor-specific antagonist BIBO3304 equally reinstated mechanical hypersensitivity in Pirt-NPY mice and their wildtype controls. We conclude that nerve injury-induced upregulation of NPY in sensory neurons does not cause mechanical or cold hypersensitivity or ongoing pain, and that tonic inhibitory control of neuropathic pain by NPY in the spinal cord is mediated by release from dorsal horn interneurons rather than sensory neurons. PERSPECTIVE: This article answers the long-standing question as to whether nerve injury-induced upregulation of NPY in primary afferent neurons modulates neuropathic pain. We report that sensory neuron-specific NPY knockout did not change pain-like behaviors. CNS interneurons rather than sensory neurons likely mediate the well-documented phenomenon of spinal NPY analgesia.

Neuropeptide Y Y2 receptors in acute and chronic pain and itch

Pain and itch are regulated by a diverse array of neuropeptides and their receptors in superficial laminae of the spinal cord dorsal horn (DH). Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is normally expressed on DH neurons but not sensory neurons. By contrast, the Npy2r receptor (Y2) is expressed on the central and peripheral terminals of sensory neurons but not on DH neurons. Neurophysiological slice recordings indicate that Y2-selective agonists inhibits spinal neurotransmitter release from sensory neurons. However, behavioral pharmacology studies indicate that Y2 agonists exert minimal changes in nociception, even after injury. Additional discrepancies in the behavioral actions of the Y2-antagonist BIIE0246 - reports of either pronociception or antinociception - have now been resolved. In the normal state, spinally-directed (intrathecal) administration of BIIE0246 elicits ongoing nociception, hypersensitivity to sensory stimulation, and aversion. Conversely, in the setting of nerve injury and inflammation, intrathecal BIIE024 reduced not only mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity, but also a measure of the affective dimension of pain (conditioned place preference). When administered in chronic pain models of latent sensitization, BIIE0246 produced a profound reinstatement of pain-like behaviors. We propose that tissue or nerve injury induces a G protein switch in the action of NPY-Y2 signaling from antinociception in the naïve state to the inhibition of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia in the injured state, and then a switch back to antinociception to keep LS in a state of remission. This model clarifies the pharmacotherapeutic potential of Y2 research, pointing to the development of a new non-opioid pharmacotherapy for chronic pain using Y2 antagonists in patients who do not develop LS.

μ-Opioid Receptor Activation at the Dorsal Reticular Nucleus Shifts Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls to Hyperalgesia in Chronic Joint Pain in Male Rats

BACKGROUND

The dorsal reticular nucleus is a pain facilitatory area involved in diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) through opioidergic mechanisms that are poorly understood. The hypothesis was that signaling of μ-opioid receptors is altered in this area with prolonged chronic inflammatory pain and that this accounts for the loss of DNICs occurring in this condition.

METHODS

Monoarthritis was induced in male Wistar rats (n = 5 to 9/group) by tibiotarsal injection of complete Freund's adjuvant. The immunolabeling of µ-opioid receptors and the phosphorylated forms of µ-opioid receptors and cAMP response element binding protein was quantified. Pharmacologic manipulation of μ-opioid receptors at the dorsal reticular nucleus was assessed in DNIC using the Randall-Selitto test.

RESULTS

At 42 days of monoarthritis, μ-opioid receptor labeling decreased at the dorsal reticular nucleus, while its phosphorylated form and the phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein increased. [d-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol]-enkephalin acetate (DAMGO) enhanced DNIC analgesia in normal animals (means ± SD: pre-DNIC: 126.9 ± 7.0 g; DNIC - DAMGO: 147.5 ± 8.0 g vs. DNIC + DAMGO: 198.1 ± 19.3 g; P < 0.001), whereas it produced hyperalgesia in monoarthritis (pre-DNIC: 67.8 ± 7.5 g; DNIC - DAMGO: 70.6 ± 7.7 g vs. DNIC + DAMGO: 32.2 ± 2.6 g; P < 0.001). An ultra-low dose of naloxone, which prevents the excitatory signaling of the μ-opioid receptor, restored DNIC analgesia in monoarthritis (DNIC - naloxone: 60.0 ± 6.1 g vs. DNIC + naloxone: 98.0 ± 13.5 g; P < 0.001), compared to saline (DNIC - saline: 62.5 ± 5.2 g vs. DNIC + saline: 64.2 ± 3.8 g). When injected before DAMGO, it restored DNIC analgesia and decreased the phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein in monoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

The dorsal reticular nucleus is likely involved in a facilitatory pathway responsible for DNIC hyperalgesia. The shift of μ-opioid receptor signaling to excitatory in this pathway likely accounts for the loss of DNIC analgesia in monoarthritis.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

How do opioids control pain circuits in the brainstem during opioid-induced disorders and in chronic pain? Implications for the treatment of chronic pain

ABSTRACT

Brainstem areas involved in descending pain modulation are crucial for the analgesic actions of opioids. However, the role of opioids in these areas during tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), and in chronic pain settings remains underappreciated. We conducted a revision of the recent studies performed in the main brainstem areas devoted to descending pain modulation with a special focus on the medullary dorsal reticular nucleus (DRt), as a distinctive pain facilitatory area and a key player in the diffuse noxious inhibitory control paradigm. We show that maladaptive processes within the signaling of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), which entail desensitization and a switch to excitatory signaling, occur in the brainstem, contributing to tolerance and OIH. In the context of chronic pain, the alterations found are complex and depend on the area and model of chronic pain. For example, the downregulation of MOR and δ-opioid receptor (DOR) in some areas, including the DRt, during neuropathic pain likely contributes to the inefficacy of opioids. However, the upregulation of MOR and DOR, at the rostral ventromedial medulla, in inflammatory pain models, suggests therapeutic avenues to explore. Mechanistically, the rationale for the diversity and complexity of alterations in the brainstem is likely provided by the alternative splicing of opioid receptors and the heteromerization of MOR. In conclusion, this review emphasizes how important it is to consider the effects of opioids at these circuits when using opioids for the treatment of chronic pain and for the development of safer and effective opioids.

Anti-allodynic and medullary modulatory effects of a single dose of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in neuropathic rats tolerant to morphine

Neuropathic pain (NP) is often treated with opioids, the prolonged use of which causes tolerance to their analgesic effect and can potentially cause death by overdose. The phytocannabinoid delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) may be an effective alternative analgesic to treat NP in morphine-tolerant subjects. Male Wistar rats developed NP after spared nerve injury, and were then treated with increasing doses of THC (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), which reduced mechanical allodynia at the dose of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg. Another group of NP rats were treated with morphine (5 mg/kg, twice daily for 7 days, subcutaneously), until tolerance developed, and on day 8 received a single dose of THC (2.5 mg/kg), which significantly reduced mechanical allodynia. To evaluate the modulation of THC in the descending pain pathway, in vivo electrophysiological recordings of pronociceptive ON cells and antinociceptive OFF cells in the rostroventral medulla (RVM) were recorded after intra-PAG microinjection of THC (10 μg/μl). NP rats with morphine tolerance, compared to the control one, showed a tonic reduction of the spontaneous firing rate of ON cells by 44%, but the THC was able to further decrease it (a hallmark of many analgesic drugs acting at supraspinal level). On the other hand, the firing rate, of the antinociceptive OFF cells was increased after morphine tolerance by 133%, but the THC failed to further activate it. Altogether, these findings indicate that a single dose of THC produces antiallodynic effect in individuals with NP who are tolerant to morphine, acting mostly on the ON cells of the descending pain pathways, but not on OFF cells.

Dynamics of the Second Extracellular Loop Control Transducer Coupling of Peptide-Activated GPCRs

Many peptide-activated rhodopsin-like GPCRs share a β-hairpin folding motif in the extracellular loop 2 (ECL2), which interacts with the peptide ligand while at the same time being connected to transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) via a highly conserved disulfide bond. Currently, it remains unknown whether the coupling of the specifically shaped ECL2 to TM3 influences the activation of peptide-activated GPCRs. We investigated this possibility in a selection of peptide GPCRs with known structures. Most of the receptors with cysteine to alanine mutations folded like the respective wild-type and resided in the cell membrane, challenging pure folding stabilization by the disulfide bridge. G-protein signaling of the disulfide mutants was retained to a greater extent in secretin-like GPCRs than in rhodopsin-like GPCRs, while recruitment of arrestin was completely abolished in both groups, which may be linked to alterations in ligand residence time. We found a correlation between receptor activity of the neuropeptide Y2 receptor and alterations in ECL2 dynamics using engineered disulfide bridges or site-directed spin labeling and EPR spectroscopy. These data highlight the functional importance of the TM3-ECL2 link for the activation of specific signaling pathways in peptide-activated GPCRs, which might have implications for future drug discovery.

Mu-opioid receptor and receptor tyrosine kinase crosstalk: Implications in mechanisms of opioid tolerance, reduced analgesia to neuropathic pain, dependence, and reward

Despite the prevalence of opioid misuse, opioids remain the frontline treatment regimen for severe pain. However, opioid safety is hampered by side-effects such as analgesic tolerance, reduced analgesia to neuropathic pain, physical dependence, or reward. These side effects promote development of opioid use disorders and ultimately cause overdose deaths due to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The intertwined nature of signaling via μ-opioid receptors (MOR), the primary target of prescription opioids, with signaling pathways responsible for opioid side-effects presents important challenges. Therefore, a critical objective is to uncouple cellular and molecular mechanisms that selectively modulate analgesia from those that mediate side-effects. One such mechanism could be the transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) via MOR. Notably, MOR-mediated side-effects can be uncoupled from analgesia signaling via targeting RTK family receptors, highlighting physiological relevance of MOR-RTKs crosstalk. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge surrounding the basic pharmacology of RTKs and bidirectional regulation of MOR signaling, as well as how MOR-RTK signaling may modulate undesirable effects of chronic opioid use, including opioid analgesic tolerance, reduced analgesia to neuropathic pain, physical dependence, and reward. Further research is needed to better understand RTK-MOR transactivation signaling pathways, and to determine if RTKs are a plausible therapeutic target for mitigating opioid side effects.

Relevance of Mu-Opioid Receptor Splice Variants and Plasticity of Their Signaling Sequelae to Opioid Analgesic Tolerance

Opioid dose escalation to effectively control pain is often linked to the current prescription opioid abuse epidemic. This creates social as well as medical imperatives to better understand the mechanistic underpinnings of opioid tolerance to develop interventions that minimize it, thereby maximizing the analgesic effectiveness of opioids. Profound opioid analgesic tolerance can be observed in the absence of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) downregulation, aggregate MOR G protein uncoupling, and MOR desensitization, in the absence of impaired G protein coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation, arrestin binding, or endocytosis. Thus, we have explored alternative biochemical sequelae that might better account for opioid analgesic tolerance. Our findings indicate that substantial plasticity among upstream and downstream components of opioid receptor signaling and the emergence of alternative signaling pathways are major contributors to opioid analgesic tolerance. An exemplar of this plasticity is our findings that chronic morphine upregulates the MOR variants MOR-1B2 and MOR-1C1 and phosphorylation of their C-terminal sites not present in MOR-1, events causally associated with the chronic morphine-induced shift in MOR G protein coupling from predominantly Gi/Go inhibitory to Gs-stimulatory adenylyl cyclase signaling. The unique feature(s) of these variants that underlies their susceptibility to adapting to chronic morphine by altering the nature of their G protein coupling reveals the richness and pliability of MOR signaling that is enabled by generating a wide diversity of MOR variants. Furthermore, given differential anatomical expression patterns of MOR variants, MOR splice variant-dependent adaptations to chronic morphine could enable mechanistic underpinnings of tolerance and dependence that are CNS region- and cell-specific.

Shift of µ-opioid Receptor Signaling in the Dorsal Reticular Nucleus Is Implicated in Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia in Male Rats

BACKGROUND

Increased descending pain facilitation accounts for opioid-induced hyperalgesia, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Given the role of µ-opioid receptors in opioid-induced hyperalgesia in animals, the authors hypothesized that the dorsal reticular nucleus, a medullary pain facilitatory area, is involved in opioid-induced hyperalgesia through altered µ-opioid receptor signaling.

METHODS

The authors used male Wistar rats (n = 5 to 8 per group), chronically infused with morphine, to evaluate in the dorsal reticular nucleus the expressions of the µ-opioid receptor and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding, a downstream marker of excitatory µ-opioid receptor signaling. The authors used pharmacologic and gene-mediated approaches. Nociceptive behaviors were evaluated by the von Frey and hot-plates tests.

RESULTS

Lidocaine fully reversed mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity induced by chronic morphine. Morphine-infusion increased µ-opioid receptor, without concomitant messenger RNA changes, and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding levels at the dorsal reticular nucleus. µ-opioid receptor knockdown in morphine-infused animals attenuated the decrease of mechanical thresholds and heat-evoked withdrawal latencies compared with the control vector (von Frey [mean ± SD]: -17 ± 8% vs. -40 ± 9.0%; P < 0.001; hot-plate: -10 ± 5% vs. -32 ± 10%; P = 0.001). µ-opioid receptor knockdown in control animals induced the opposite (von Frey: -31 ± 8% vs. -17 ± 8%; P = 0.053; hotplate: -24 ± 6% vs. -3 ± 10%; P = 0.001). The µ-opioid receptor agonist (D-ALA2,N-ME-PHE4,GLY5-OL)-enkephalin acetate (DAMGO) decreased mechanical thresholds and did not affect heat-evoked withdrawal latencies in morphine-infused animals. In control animals, DAMGO increased both mechanical thresholds and heat-evoked withdrawal latencies. Ultra-low-dose naloxone, which prevents the excitatory signaling of the µ-opioid receptor, administered alone, attenuated mechanical and thermal hypersensitivities, and coadministered with DAMGO, restored DAMGO analgesic effects and decreased phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic morphine shifted µ-opioid receptor signaling from inhibitory to excitatory at the dorsal reticular nucleus, likely enhancing descending facilitation during opioid-induced hyperalgesia in the rat.

Disappearance of the inhibitory effect of neuropeptide Y within the dorsolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in rats with chronic pain

We recently showed that the mesolimbic dopaminergic system was tonically suppressed during chronic pain by enhanced corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) signaling within the dorsolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (dlBNST), and that inhibition of intra-dlBNST CRF signaling restored the mesolimbic dopaminergic system function. Specifically, bilateral intra-dlBNST injections of the CRF type 1 receptor antagonist NBI27914 increased intra-nucleus accumbens dopamine release and induced reward-related behaviors in rats with chronic pain. Here, we used a conditioned place preference (CPP) test to explore whether intra-dlBNST injections of neuropeptide Y (NPY) restored the mesolimbic reward system function in chronic pain rats, because we previously showed that NPY had an effect opposite to that of CRF in dlBNST neurons. Specifically, CRF depolarized type II dlBNST neurons whereas NPY hyperpolarized them. However, unexpectedly, intra-dlBNST NPY injections had no effect on CPP test outcomes. Then, we compared the effects of NPY on the membrane potentials of type II dlBNST neurons of sham-operated control rats and those of chronic pain animals. Whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology revealed that NPY hyperpolarized type II dlBNST neurons in the sham-operated group. By contrast, in the chronic pain group, NPY did not hyperpolarize, but rather depolarized, type II dlBNST neurons. These results indicate that NPY no longer hyperpolarizes type II dlBNST neurons in rats with chronic pain, therefore it does not reverse the excitatory effects of CRF. This may be why intra-dlBNST injections of NPY into chronic pain rats did not exhibit a rewarding effect in the CPP test, whereas intra-dlBNST injections of NBI27914 did. This is the first study to demonstrate a chronic pain-induced neuroplastic change in NPY signaling in the dlBNST. Such a change may be involved in the dysfunction of the mesolimbic reward system under the chronic pain condition.

Phosphorylation of unique C-terminal sites of the mu-opioid receptor variants 1B2 and 1C1 influences their Gs association following chronic morphine

We recently demonstrated in rat spinal cord that a regimen of escalating doses of systemic morphine, analogous to regimens used clinically for chronic pain management, selectively up-regulates the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) splice variants MOR-1B2 and MOR-1C1 mRNA and functional protein. This study investigated the potential relevance of up-regulating MOR-1B2 and MOR-1C1 to the ability of chronic morphine to shift MOR signaling from predominantly G_i /G_o inhibitory to G_s stimulatory. Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that chronic morphine induces phosphorylation of carboxyl terminal sites unique to MOR-1B2 and MOR-1C1, and that this phosphorylation is causally related to augmented association of these variants with G_s α. Hypotheses were validated by (i) abolition of the chronic morphine-induced increment in MOR-1C1 and MOR-1B2 association with G_s α by inhibitors of protein kinase A and Casein kinase 2, respectively; (ii) failure of chronic morphine to augment MOR variant G_s α interactions in Chinese hamster ovary cells transiently transfected with either rat MOR-1C1 or MOR-1B2 in which targeted protein kinase A and Casein kinase 2 serine phosphorylation sites, respectively, were mutated to alanine; (iii) abrogation of chronic morphine-induced augmented MOR G_s α association in spinal cord of male rats following intrathecal administration of dicer substrate small interfering RNAs targeting MOR-1B2/MOR-1C1 mRNA. The ability of chronic morphine to not only up-regulate-specific MOR variants but also their carboxyl terminal phosphorylation and consequent augmented association with G_s α may represent a novel component of opioid tolerance mechanisms, suggesting novel potential targets for tolerance abatement.

A Differential Hypofunctionality of Gαi Proteins Occurs in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Correlates with the Risk of Disease Progression

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most prevalent spine deformity and the molecular mechanisms underlying its pathophysiology remain poorly understood. We have previously found a differential impairment of melatonin receptor signaling in AIS osteoblasts allowing the classification of patients into three biological endophenotypes or functional groups (FG1, FG2 and FG3). Here, we provide evidence that the defect characterizing each endophenotype lies at the level of Gαi proteins leading to a systemic and generalized differential impairment of Gi-coupled receptor signaling. The three Gαi isoforms exhibited a selective serine phosphorylation patterns for each AIS endophenotype resulting in a differential reduction in Gαi protein activity as determined by cellular dielectric spectroscopy and small interfering RNA methods. We found that one endophenotype (FG2) with phosphorylated Gαi₁ and Gαi₂ was consistently associated with a significantly high risk of spinal deformity progression when compared to the other two endophenotypes (FG1 and FG3). We further demonstrated that each endophenotype is conserved among affected family members. This study expands our understanding of the mechanism underlying the Gi-coupled receptor signaling dysfunction occurring in AIS and provides the first evidence for its hereditary nature. Collectively, our findings offers a new perspective on Gαi hypofunctionality in a human disease by revealing specific serine phosphorylation signatures of Gαi isoforms that may facilitate the identification of AIS patients at risk of spinal deformity progression.

Dissociation between morphine-induced spinal gliosis and analgesic tolerance by ultra-low-dose α2-adrenergic and cannabinoid CB1-receptor antagonists

Long-term use of opioid analgesics is limited by tolerance development and undesirable adverse effects. Paradoxically, spinal administration of ultra-low-dose (ULD) G-protein-coupled receptor antagonists attenuates analgesic tolerance. Here, we determined whether systemic ULD α2-adrenergic receptor (AR) antagonists attenuate the development of morphine tolerance, whether these effects extend to the cannabinoid (CB1) receptor system, and if behavioral effects are reflected in changes in opioid-induced spinal gliosis. Male rats were treated daily with morphine (5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with ULD α2-AR (atipamezole or efaroxan; 17 ng/kg) or CB1 (rimonabant; 5 ng/kg) antagonists; control groups received ULD injections only. Thermal tail flick latencies were assessed across 7 days, before and 30 min after the injection. On day 8, spinal cords were isolated, and changes in spinal gliosis were assessed through fluorescent immunohistochemistry. Both ULD α2-AR antagonists attenuated morphine tolerance, whereas the ULD CB1 antagonist did not. In contrast, both ULD atipamezole and ULD rimonabant attenuated morphine-induced microglial reactivity and astrogliosis in deep and superficial spinal dorsal horn. So, although paradoxical effects of ULD antagonists are common to several G-protein-coupled receptor systems, these may not involve similar mechanisms. Spinal glia alone may not be the main mechanism through which tolerance is modulated.

Biased signaling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): Molecular determinants of GPCR/transducer selectivity and therapeutic potential

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) convey signals across membranes via interaction with G proteins. Originally, an individual GPCR was thought to signal through one G protein family, comprising cognate G proteins that mediate canonical receptor signaling. However, several deviations from canonical signaling pathways for GPCRs have been described. It is now clear that GPCRs can engage with multiple G proteins and the line between cognate and non-cognate signaling is increasingly blurred. Furthermore, GPCRs couple to non-G protein transducers, including β-arrestins or other scaffold proteins, to initiate additional signaling cascades. Receptor/transducer selectivity is dictated by agonist-induced receptor conformations as well as by collateral factors. In particular, ligands stabilize distinct receptor conformations to preferentially activate certain pathways, designated 'biased signaling'. In this regard, receptor sequence alignment and mutagenesis have helped to identify key receptor domains for receptor/transducer specificity. Furthermore, molecular structures of GPCRs bound to different ligands or transducers have provided detailed insights into mechanisms of coupling selectivity. However, receptor dimerization, compartmentalization, and trafficking, receptor-transducer-effector stoichiometry, and ligand residence and exposure times can each affect GPCR coupling. Extrinsic factors including cell type or assay conditions can also influence receptor signaling. Understanding these factors may lead to the development of improved biased ligands with the potential to enhance therapeutic benefit, while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, evidence for ligand-specific GPCR signaling toward different transducers or pathways is elaborated. Furthermore, molecular determinants of biased signaling toward these pathways and relevant examples of the potential clinical benefits and pitfalls of biased ligands are discussed.

Chronic opioid treatment augments caveolin-1 scaffolding: relevance to stimulatory μ-opioid receptor adenylyl cyclase signaling

Caveolin-1 is the predominant structural protein of caveolae, a subset of (lipid) membrane rafts that compartmentalize cell signaling. Caveolin-1 binds most to G protein-coupled receptors and their signaling partners, thereby enhancing interactions among signaling cascade components and the relative activation of specific G protein-coupled pathways. This study reveals that chronic opioid exposure of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) expressing Chinese hamster ovary cells (MOR-CHO) and chronic in vivo morphine exposure of rat spinal cord augmented recruitment of multiple components of MOR-adenylyl cyclase (AC) stimulatory signaling by caveolin-1. Strikingly, in MOR-CHO and spinal cord, blocking the caveolin-1 scaffolding domain substantially attenuated the chronic morphine-induced increased interaction of caveolin-1 with MOR, Gsα, protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), and AC. Chronic morphine treatment also increased interactions among the above signaling proteins, thus enabling sufentanil to stimulate (rather than inhibit) cAMP production within lipid membrane microdomains. The latter finding underscores the functionality of augmented interactions among MOR, G_s α, PP2A, and AC. In the aggregate, our data strongly suggest that augmented caveolin-1 scaffolding undergirds the ability of chronic opioids to recruit an ancillary signaling pathway by acting as an organizing template for MOR-G_s α-AC signaling and delimiting the membrane compartment(s) in which it occurs. Since caveolin-1 binds to a wide spectrum of signaling molecules, altered caveolin-1 scaffolding following chronic opioid treatment is likely to pertain to most, if not all, MOR signaling partners. The chronic morphine-induced trigger that augments caveolin-1 scaffolding could represent a seminal perturbation that initiates the wide spectrum of adaptations thought to contribute to opioid tolerance and dependence.

Melatonin reverses morphine tolerance by inhibiting microglia activation and HSP27 expression

AIMS

Melatonin has been reported to attenuate opioid tolerance. In this study, we explored the possible mechanism of melatonin in diminishing morphine tolerance.

MAIN METHODS

Two intrathecal (i.t.) catheters were implanted in male Wistar rats for drug delivery. One was linked to a mini-osmotic pump for morphine or saline infusion. On the seventh day, 50μg of melatonin or vehicle was injected through the other catheter instantly after discontinuation of morphine or saline infusion; 3h later, 15μg of morphine or saline was injected. The antinociceptive response was then measured using the tail-flick test every 30min for 120min.

KEY FINDINGS

The results showed that chronic morphine infusion elicited antinociceptive tolerance and upregulated heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) expression in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. Melatonin pretreatment partially restored morphine's antinociceptive effect in morphine-tolerant rats and reversed morphine-induced HSP27 upregulation. In addition, chronic morphine infusion induced microglial cell activation and was reversed by melatonin treatment.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study provides evidence that melatonin, acting via inhibiting morphine-induced neuroinflammation, can be useful as a therapeutic adjuvant for patients under long-term opioid treatment for pain relief.

Contribution of adrenomedullin to the switch of G protein-coupled μ-opioid receptors from Gi to Gs in the spinal dorsal horn following chronic morphine exposure in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic exposure to morphine increases spinal adrenomedullin (AM) bioactivity resulting in the development and maintenance of morphine tolerance. This study investigated the possible involvement of AM in morphine-evoked alteration in μ-opioid receptor-coupled G proteins.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Agents were administered intrathecally (i.t.) in rats. Nociceptive behaviours and cumulative dose-response of morphine analgesia were assessed. Neurochemicals in the spinal dorsal horn were assayed by immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis and ELISA.

KEY RESULTS

Intrathecal injection of AM (8 μg) for 9 days decreased and increased the levels of μ receptor-coupled Gi and Gs proteins respectively. Morphine stimulation (5 μg) after chronic treatment with AM also induced an increase in cAMP production in the spinal dorsal horn. Co-administration of the selective AM receptor antagonist AM22-52 inhibited chronic morphine-evoked switch of G protein-coupled μ receptor from Gi to Gs. Chronic exposure to AM increased the phosphorylation of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) and ERK. Co-administration of the PKA inhibitor H-89 (5 μg) or MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 (1 μg) reversed the AM-induced thermal/mechanical hypersensitivity, decline in morphine analgesic potency, switch of G protein-coupled μ receptor and increase in cAMP.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The present study supports the hypothesis that an increase in AM activity in the spinal dorsal horn contributes to the switch of the μ receptor-coupled G protein from Gi to Gs protein via the activation of cAMP/PKA/CREB and ERK signalling pathways in chronic morphine use.

Selective up-regulation of functional mu-opioid receptor splice variants by chronic opioids

We recently reported (Verzillo, et al. J. Neurochem: 130, 790-796, 2014) that chronic systemic morphine selectively up-regulates mRNA encoding two C-terminal μ-opioid receptor (MOR) splice variants, MOR-1C1 and MOR-1B2 (MOR-1B2/-1C1). Given the known disconnects between changes in levels of mRNA and corresponding protein, it is essential to directly demonstrate that chronic opioid treatment elevates functional MOR-1B2/-1C1 protein prior to inferring relevance of these MOR variants to spinal opioid tolerance mechanisms. Accordingly, we investigated the ability of chronic opioid exposure to up-regulate MOR protein in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with rat MOR variants MOR-1B2, MOR-1C1, or MOR-1 (considered to be the predominant MOR). Findings revealed that chronic treatment with the clinically relevant opioids morphine, oxycodone and hydrocodone substantially up-regulated membrane MOR-1B2/-1C1 protein. This up-regulation was abolished by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, eliminating contributions from receptor redistribution. The increment in MOR-1B2/-1C1 protein was paralleled by a significant increment in opioid agonist-stimulated GTPγS-binding (reflective of increased aggregate MOR G protein coupling) indicating that up-regulated MOR-1B2/-1C1 represented functional receptors. Strikingly, these tolerance-associated adaptations of MOR-1B2/-1C1 differed considerably from those of MOR-1. Antithetical regulation of MOR-1B2/-1C1 and MOR-1 by chronic opioids has significant implications for the design of new therapeutic agents to counteract opioid analgesic tolerance and accompanying addiction. Since chronic opioids induce MOR-1B2/-1C1 up-regulation in spinal cord of males, but not females, elucidating cellular compartments and intracellular pathways mediating MOR-1B2/-1C1 up-regulation and defining their unique signaling attributes would enable a precision medicinal approach to pain management and addiction therapy. In the spinal cord of males, but not females, chronic morphine up-regulates mRNA encoding two mu-opioid receptor (MOR) variants, MOR-1B2 and MOR-1C1 (MOR-1B2/-1C1). We now demonstrate that chronic treatment with the clinically relevant opioids morphine, hydrocodone or oxycodone up-regulates MOR-1B2/-1C1 functional protein, which is dependent on de novo protein synthesis. Findings underscore the importance of unique signaling attributes of MOR variants to sexually dimorphic tolerance mechanisms.

Biased signalling: the instinctive skill of the cell in the selection of appropriate signalling pathways

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are members of a family of proteins which are generally regarded as the largest group of therapeutic drug targets. Ligands of GPCRs do not usually activate all cellular signalling pathways linked to a particular seven-transmembrane receptor in a uniform manner. The fundamental idea behind this concept is that each ligand has its own ability, while interacting with the receptor, to activate different signalling pathways (or a particular set of signalling pathways) and it is this concept which is known as biased signalling. The importance of biased signalling is that it may selectively activate biological responses to favour therapeutically beneficial signalling pathways and to avoid adverse effects. There are two levels of biased signalling. First, bias can arise from the ability of GPCRs to couple to a subset of the available G-protein subtypes: Gαs, Gαq/11, Gαi/o or Gα12/13. These subtypes produce the diverse effects of GPCRs by targeting different effectors. Secondly, biased GPCRs may differentially activate G-proteins or β-arrestins. β-Arrestins are ubiquitously expressed and function to terminate or inhibit classic G-protein signalling and initiate distinct β-arrestin-mediated signalling processes. The interplay of G-protein and β-arrestin signalling largely determines the cellular consequences of the administration of GPCR-targeted drugs. In the present review, we highlight the particular functionalities of biased signalling and discuss its biological effects subsequent to GPCR activation. We consider that biased signalling is potentially allowing a choice between signalling through ‘beneficial’ pathways and the avoidance of ‘harmful’ ones.

Gα(i/o)-coupled receptor-mediated sensitization of adenylyl cyclase: 40 years later

Heterologous sensitization of adenylyl cyclase (also referred to as superactivation, sensitization, or supersensitization of adenylyl cyclase) is a cellular adaptive response first described 40 years ago in the laboratory of Dr. Marshall Nirenberg. This apparently paradoxical cellular response occurs following persistent activation of Gαi/o-coupled receptors and causes marked enhancement in the activity of adenylyl cyclases, thereby increasing cAMP production. Since our last review in 2005, significant progress in the field has led to a better understanding of the relevance of, and the cellular biochemical processes that occur during the development and expression of heterologous sensitization. In this review we will discuss the recent advancements in the field and the mechanistic hypotheses on heterologous sensitization.

Molecular mechanism for opioid dichotomy: bidirectional effect of μ-opioid receptors on P2X₃ receptor currents in rat sensory neurones

Here, we describe a molecular switch associated with opioid receptors-linked signalling cascades that provides a dual opioid control over P2X3 purinoceptor in sensory neurones. Leu-enkephalin inhibited P2X3-mediated currents with IC50 ~10 nM in ~25% of small nociceptive rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones. In contrast, in neurones pretreated with pertussis toxin leu-enkephalin produced stable and significant increase of P2X3 currents. All effects of opioid were abolished by selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP), nonselective inhibitor naloxone, and by PLC inhibitor U73122. Thus, we discovered a dual link between purinoceptors and μ-opioid receptors: the latter exert both inhibitory (pertussis toxin-sensitive) and stimulatory (pertussis toxin-insensitive) actions on P2X3 receptors through phospholipase C (PLC)-dependent pathways. This dual opioid control of P2X3 receptors may provide a molecular explanation for dichotomy of opioid therapy. Pharmacological control of this newly identified facilitation/inhibition switch may open new perspectives for the adequate medical use of opioids, the most powerful pain-killing agents known today.

Acute morphine alters GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala during naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal: role of cyclic AMP

The central amygdala (CeA) plays an important role in opioid addiction. Therefore, we examined the effects of naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal (WD) on GABAergic transmission in rat CeA neurons using whole-cell recordings with naloxone in the bath. The basal frequency of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) increased in CeA neurons from WD compared to placebo rats. Acute morphine (10 μ M) had mixed effects (≥20% change from baseline) on mIPSCs in placebo and WD rats. In most CeA neurons (64%) from placebo rats, morphine significantly decreased mIPSC frequency and amplitude. In 32% of placebo neurons, morphine significantly increased mIPSC amplitudes but had no effect on mIPSC frequency. In WD rats, acute morphine significantly increased mIPSC frequency but had no effect on mIPSC amplitude in 41% of CeA neurons. In 45% of cells, acute morphine significantly decreased mIPSC frequency and amplitude. Pre-treatment with the cyclic AMP inhibitor (R)-adenosine, cyclic 3',5'-(hydrogenphosphorothioate) triethylammonium (RP), prevented acute morphine-induced potentiation of mIPSCs. Pre-treatment of slices with the Gi/o G-protein subunit inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX) did not prevent the acute morphine-induced enhancement or inhibition of mIPSCs. PTX and RP decreased basal mIPSC frequencies and amplitudes only in WD rats. The results suggest that inhibition of GABAergic transmission in the CeA by acute morphine is mediated by PTX-insensitive mechanisms, although PTX-sensitive mechanisms cannot be ruled out for non-morphine responsive cells; by contrast, potentiation of GABAergic transmission is mediated by activated cAMP signaling that also mediates the increased basal GABAergic transmission in WD rats. Our data indicate that during the acute phase of WD, the CeA opioid and GABAergic systems undergo neuroadaptative changes conditioned by a previous chronic morphine exposure and dependence.

Activation of Mas oncogene-related gene (Mrg) C receptors enhances morphine-induced analgesia through modulation of coupling of μ-opioid receptor to Gi-protein in rat spinal dorsal horn

Mas oncogene-related gene (Mrg) G protein-coupled receptors are exclusively expressed in small-sized neurons in trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in mammals. The present study investigated the effect of MrgC receptor activation on morphine analgesic potency and addressed its possible mechanisms. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the specific MrgC receptor agonist bovine adrenal medulla 8-22 (BAM8-22, 3 nmol) increased morphine-induced analgesia and shifted the morphine dose-response curve to the left in rats. Acute morphine (5 μg) reduced the coupling of μ-opioid receptors (MORs) to Gi-, but not Gs-, protein in the spinal dorsal horn. The i.t. BAM8-22 (3 nmol) prevented this change of G-protein repertoire while the inactive MrgC receptor agonist BAM8-18 (3 nmol, i.t.) failed to do so. A double labeling study showed the co-localization of MrgC and MORs in DRG neurons. The i.t. BAM8-22 also increased the coupling of MORs to Gi-protein and recruited Gi-protein from cytoplasm to the cell membrane in the spinal dorsal horn. Application of BAM8-22 (10nM) in the cultured ganglion explants for 30 min increased Gi-protein mRNA, but not Gs-protein mRNA. The present study demonstrated that acute administration of morphine inhibited the repertoire of MOR/Gi-protein coupling in the spinal dorsal horn in vivo. The findings highlight a novel mechanism by which the activation of MrgC receptors can modulate the coupling of MORs with Gi-protein to enhance morphine-induced analgesia. Hence, adjunct treatment of MrgC agonist BAM8-22 may be of therapeutic value to relieve pain.

The stereoisomer (+)-naloxone potentiates G-protein coupling and feeding associated with stimulation of mu opioid receptors in the parabrachial nucleus

Classically, opioids produce their effects by activating Gi-proteins that inhibit adenylate cyclase activity. Previous studies proposed that mu-opioid receptors can also stimulate adenylate cyclase due to an initial transient coupling to Gs-proteins. Treatment with ultra-low doses of the nonselective opioid antagonist (-)-naloxone or its inactive enantiomer (+)-naloxone blocks this excitatory effect and enhances Gi-coupling. Previously we reported that infusion of the mu-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Glycinol5]-Enkephalin (DAMGO) into the mu-opioid receptor expressing lateral parabrachial nucleus increases feeding. Pretreatment with (-)-naloxone blocks this effect. We used this parabrachial circuit as a model to assess cellular actions of ultra-low doses of (-)-naloxone and (+)-naloxone in modifying the effects of DAMGO. Our results showed that an ultra-low concentration of (-)-naloxone (0.001 nM) and several concentrations of (+)-naloxone (0.01-10 nM) enhanced DAMGO-stimulated guanosine-5'-0-(γ-thio)-triphosphate incorporation in parabrachial sections in vitro. Further, we analyzed the relevance of these effects in vivo. In the present study, we show that (+)-naloxone can potentiate DAMGO-induced feeding at doses at which (-)-naloxone was an antagonist. These results implicated (+)-naloxone as a novel tool for studying mu-opioid receptor functions and suggest that (+)-naloxone may have therapeutic value to enhance clinical actions of opiate drugs.

Opioid receptor trafficking and signaling: what happens after opioid receptor activation?

Prolonged opioid treatment leads to a comprehensive cellular adaptation mediated by opioid receptors, a basis to understand the development of opioid tolerance and dependence. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying opioid-induced cellular adaptation remain obscure. Recent advances in opioid receptor trafficking and signaling in cells have extensively increased our insight into the network of intracellular signal integration. This review focuses on those important intracellular biochemical processes that play critical roles in the development of opioid tolerance and dependence after opioid receptor activation, and tries to explain what happens after opioid receptor activation, and how the cellular adaptation develops from cell membrane to nucleus. Decades of research have delineated a network on opioid receptor trafficking and signaling, but the challenge remains to explain opioid tolerance and dependence from a single cellular signal network.

Ser/ Thr residues at α3/β5 loop of Gαs are important in morphine-induced adenylyl cyclase sensitization but not mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation

The signaling switch of β2-adrenergic and μ(1) -opioid receptors from stimulatory G-protein (G(αs) ) to inhibitory G-protein (G(αi) ) (and vice versa) influences adenylyl cyclase (AC) and extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 activation. Post-translational modifications, including dephosphorylation of G(αs) , enhance opioid receptor coupling to G(αs) . In the present study, we substituted the Ser/Thr residues of G(αs) at the α3/β5 and α4/β6 loops aiming to study the role of G(αs) lacking Ser/Thr phosphorylation with respect to AC sensitization and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Isoproterenol increased the cAMP concentration (EC(50) = 22.8 ± 3.4 μm) in G(αs) -transfected S49 cyc- cells but not in nontransfected cells. However, there was no significant difference between the G(αs) -wild-type (wt) and mutants. Morphine (10 μm) inhibited AC activity more efficiently in cyc- compared to G(αs) -wt introduced cells (P < 0.05); however, we did not find a notable difference between G(αs) -wt and mutants. Interestingly, G(αs) -wt transfected cells showed more sensitization with respect to AC after chronic morphine compared to nontransfected cells (101 ± 12% versus 34 ± 6%; P < 0.001); μ1-opioid receptor interacted with G(αs) , and both co-immunoprecipitated after chronic morphine exposure. Furthermore, mutation of T270A and S272A (P < 0.01), as well as T270A, S272A and S261A (P < 0.05), in α3/β5, resulted in a higher level of AC supersensitization. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was rapidly induced by isoproterenol (by 9.5 ± 2.4-fold) and morphine (22 ± 2.2-fold) in G(αs) -transfected cells; mutations of α3/β5 and α4/β6 did not affect the pattern or extent of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. The findings of the present study show that G(αs) interacts with the μ1-opioid receptor, and the Ser/Thr mutation to Ala at the α3/β5 loop of G(αs) enhances morphine-induced AC sensitization. In addition, G(αs) was required for the rapid phosphorylation of ERK1/2 by isoproterenol but not morphine.

Pleiotropic opioid regulation of spinal endomorphin 2 release and its adaptations to opioid withdrawal are sexually dimorphic

We studied adaptations to acute precipitated opioid withdrawal of spinal μ-opioid receptor (MOR)-coupled regulation of the release of endomorphin 2 (EM2). The release of this highly MOR-selective endogenous opioid from opioid-naive spinal tissue of male rats is subjected to MOR-coupled positive as well as negative modulation via cholera toxin-sensitive G(s) and pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i)/G(o), respectively. The net effect of this concomitant bidirectional modulation is inhibitory. MOR-coupled pleiotropic regulation of EM2 release is retained in opioid-withdrawn spinal tissue of male rats, but the balance of MOR-coupled inhibitory and facilitatory regulation shifted such that facilitatory regulation predominates. Augmented coupling of MOR to G(s) is causally associated with this change. Strikingly, pleiotropic characteristics of MOR-coupled regulation of spinal EM2 release and adaptations thereof to opioid withdrawal are male-specific. In females, MOR-coupled regulation of EM2 release from opioid-naive and -withdrawn spinal tissue does not have a significant G(s)-coupled facilitatory component, and MOR-coupled inhibition of EM2 release persists unabated in withdrawn preparations. The male-specific adaptations to chronic morphine that shift the relative predominance of opposing dual G protein-coupled MOR pathways provides a mechanism for mitigating inhibitory MOR signaling without losing MOR-coupled feedback regulation. These adaptations enable using endogenous EM2 as a substitute for morphine that had been precipitously removed. The sexually dimorphic functionality and regulation of spinal EM2/MOR-coupled signaling suggest the clinical utility of using sex-specific treatments for addiction that harness the activity of endogenous opioids.

Opioid receptor subtypes: fact or artifact?

There is a vast amount of pharmacological evidence favouring the existence of multiple subtypes of opioid receptors. In addition to the primary classification of µ (mu: MOP), δ (delta: DOP), κ (kappa: KOP) receptors, and the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor (NOP), various groups have further classified the pharmacological µ into µ(1-3), the δ into δ(1-2)/δ(complexed/non-complexed), and the κ into κ(1-3). From an anaesthetic perspective, the suggestions that µ(1) produced analgesia and µ(2) produced respiratory depression are particularly important. However, subsequent to the formal identification of the primary opioid receptors (MOP/DOP/KOP/NOP) by cloning and the use of this information to produce knockout animals, evidence for these additional subtypes is lacking. Indeed, knockout of a single gene (and hence receptor) results in a loss of all function associated with that receptor. In the case of MOP knockout, analgesia and respiratory depression is lost. This suggests that further sub-classification of the primary types is unwise. So how can the wealth of pharmacological data be reconciled with new molecular information? In addition to some simple misclassification (κ(3) is probably NOP), there are several possibilities which include: (i) alternate splicing of a common gene product, (ii) receptor dimerization, (iii) interaction of a common gene product with other receptors/signalling molecules, or (iv) a combination of (i)-(iii). Assigning variations in ligand activity (pharmacological subtypes) to one or more of these molecular suggestions represents an interesting challenge for future opioid research.

BiP, an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone, modulates the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance

Morphine is a potent analgesic, but the molecular mechanism for tolerance formation after repeated use is not fully understood. Binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone that is central to ER function. We examined knock-in mice expressing a mutant BiP with the retrieval sequence deleted in order to elucidate physiological processes that are sensitive to BiP functions. We tested the thermal antinociceptive effect of morphine in heterozygous mutant BiP mice in a hot plate test. Paw withdrawal latencies before and after a single administration of morphine were not significantly different between the wild-type and mutant BiP mice. Repeated morphine administration caused the development of morphine tolerance in the wild-type mice. The activation of glycogen synthase kinase 3b (GSK-3b) was associated with morphine tolerance, because an inhibitor of GSK-3β prevented it. On the other hand, the mutant BiP mice showed less morphine tolerance, and the activation of GSK-3b was suppressed in their brain. These results suggest that BiP may play an important role in the development of morphine tolerance. Furthermore, we found that a chemical chaperone which improves ER protein folding capacity also attenuated the development of morphine tolerance in wild-type mice, suggesting a possible clinical application of chemical chaperones in preventing morphine tolerance.

Mu opioid receptor mRNA expression, binding, and functional coupling to G-proteins in human epileptic hippocampus

Mu opioid receptors (MOR) are known to be involved in seizure activity. The main goal of the present study was to characterize the MOR mRNA expression, binding, as well as G protein activation mediated by these receptors in epileptic hippocampus of patients with pharmacoresistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In contrast with autopsy samples, hippocampus obtained from patients with mesial TLE demonstrated enhanced MOR mRNA expression (116%). Saturation binding experiments revealed significantly higher (60%) B(max) values for the mesial TLE group, whereas the K(d) values were not statistically different. Although mesial TLE group demonstrated high levels of basal binding for the G proteins (136%), DAMGO-stimulated [(35)S]GTPγS binding did not demonstrate significant alterations. In conclusion, our present data provide strong evidence that the epileptic hippocampus of patients with pharmacoresistant mesial TLE presents significant alterations in MOR. Such changes may represent adaptive mechanisms to compensate for other as yet unknown alterations.

Changes in the gene expression of specific G-protein subunits correlate with morphine insensitivity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Several animal and human studies have shown a decreased analgesic potency of morphine in diabetic subjects. Since G-protein subunits have an important role in morphine effects at the cellular level and the exact mechanism(s) of diabetes-induced morphine insensitivity has not been fully clarified yet, the present study was designed to determine the changes in the levels of G(alphai), G(alphas), G(beta) mRNAs and proteins involved in this phenomenon. All experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats. The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold. Diabetes was induced by injection of 50 mg/kg (i.p.) streptozotocin. Four weeks after diabetes induction, the dorsal half of the lumbar spinal cord was assayed for the expression of G-protein subunits using semiquantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting. The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal morphine (5, 10 and 15 microg i.t.) was significantly reduced in diabetic rats and these effects were reversed with insulin replacement. In diabetic animals, a significant increase in the mRNA levels of G(alphai) (23.5%) was observed in the dorsal portion of the lumbar spinal cord. The mRNA level of G(alphas) and G(beta) did not change. Following diabetes a significant decrease in the protein levels of G(alphai) was induced. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the protein level of G(alphas) and G(beta). In diabetic animals that received insulin, levels of G(alphai) mRNA and protein were close to those in control rats. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the expression pattern of the cellular components involved in morphine analgesia changes in diabetic animals. This may be, at least partly, responsible for diabetes-induced morphine insensitivity.

Human abuse liability assessment of oxycodone combined with ultra-low-dose naltrexone

RATIONALE

Prescription opioid abuse has risen dramatically in the United States as clinicians have increased opioid prescribing for alleviation of both acute and chronic pain. Opioid analgesics with decreased risk for abuse are needed.

OBJECTIVE

Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that opioids combined with ultra-low-dose naltrexone (NTX) may have increased analgesic potency and have suggested reduced abuse or dependence liability. This study addressed whether addition of ultra-low-dose naltrexone might decrease the abuse liability of oxycodone (OXY) in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study systematically examined the subjective and physiological effects of combining oral OXY and ultra-low NTX doses in 14 experienced opioid abusers. Seven acute drug conditions given at least 5 days apart were compared in a within-subject crossover design: placebo, OXY 20 mg, OXY 40 mg, plus each of the active OXY doses combined with 0.0001 and 0.001 mg NTX.

RESULTS

The methods were sensitive to detecting opioid effects on abuse liability indices, with significant differences between all OXY conditions and placebo as well as between 20 and 40 mg OXY doses on positive subjective ratings (e.g., "I feel a good drug effect" or "I like the drug"), on observer- and participant-rated opioid agonist effects, and on a drug-versus-money value rating. There were no significant differences or evident trends associated with the addition of either NTX dose on any abuse liability indices.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ultra-low-dose NTX to OXY did not decrease abuse liability of acutely administered OXY in experienced opioid abusers.

Shared mechanisms for opioid tolerance and a transition to chronic pain

Clinical pain conditions may remain responsive to opiate analgesics for extended periods, but such persistent acute pain can undergo a transition to an opiate-resistant chronic pain state that becomes a much more serious clinical problem. To test the hypothesis that cellular mechanisms of chronic pain in the primary afferent also contribute to the development of opiate resistance, we used a recently developed model of the transition of from acute to chronic pain, hyperalgesic priming. Repeated intradermal administration of the potent and highly selective mu-opioid agonist, [d-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),gly-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), to produce tolerance for its inhibition of prostaglandin E(2) hyperalgesia, simultaneously produced hyperalgesic priming. Conversely, injection of an inflammogen, carrageenan, used to produce priming produced DAMGO tolerance. Both effects were prevented by inhibition of protein kinase Cepsilon (PKCepsilon). Carrageenan also induced opioid dependence, manifest as mu-opioid receptor antagonist (d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2))-induced hyperalgesia that, like priming, was PKCepsilon and G(i) dependent. These findings suggest that the transition from acute to chronic pain, and development of mu-opioid receptor tolerance and dependence may be linked by common cellular mechanisms in the primary afferent.

Subcellular localization of mu-opioid receptor G(s) signaling

In membranes obtained from mu-opioid receptor (MOR) expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (MOR-CHO), the MOR-selective agonist sufentanil produced a concentration-dependent stimulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding to G(s)alpha that was abolished by blocking MOR with naloxone. This unequivocally demonstrates the long-debated functionality of the previously described association of MOR with G(s)alpha. Several complementary observations indicate the relevance of caveolae to MOR-coupled G(s)alpha signaling. 1) In MOR-CHO membranes, sufentanil stimulated the translocation of G(s)alpha into Triton-insoluble membrane compartments. 2) Sufentanil enhanced the coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) of G(s)alpha and adenylyl cyclase (AC) with caveolin-1 (a marker for caveolae) from the Triton-insoluble membrane fraction of spinal cord and MOR-CHO. 3) MOR blockade (via naloxone) or G(s) inactivation (via cholera toxin) abolished both the increased trafficking of G(s)alpha into the Triton-insoluble membrane fraction of MOR-CHO and the augmented co-IP from spinal cord membranes of G(s)alpha and AC with caveolin-1. This indicates that these events occurred subsequent to activation of MOR and G(s)alpha. Strikingly, lesser-phosphorylated G(s)alpha, which preferentially couple to MOR (Mol Brain Res 135:217-224, 2005; Mol Pharmacol 72:753-760, 2007; Mol Pharmacol 73:868-879, 2008), are concentrated in caveolae, underscoring their relevance to MOR G(s)alpha signaling. MOR-stimulated trafficking of G(s)alpha and AC into caveolae and the likelihood of increased MOR G(s)alpha coupling within caveolae could suggest that they contain the downstream effectors for MOR G(s)alpha AC signaling.

Modulation by neuropeptide FF of the interaction of mu-opioid (MOP) receptor with G-proteins

The Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) system is known to modulate the effects of opioids in vivo and in vitro. In the present study, we have investigated the effect of NPFF agonists on the coupling of the Mu-opioid (MOP) receptor to G-proteins in a model of SH-SY5Y cells transfected with NPFF(2) receptor, in which the neuronal anti-opioid activity of NPFF was previously reproduced. Activation of G-proteins was monitored by [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay and analysis of G-protein subunits associated with MOP receptors was performed by Western blotting after immunoprecipitation of the receptor. The results demonstrate that concentrations of NPFF agonists that produce a cellular anti-opioid effect, did not affect the ability of the opioid agonist DAMGO to activate G-proteins. However, at saturating concentration of agonist or when expression of receptor was high, opioid and NPFF agonists did not stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in an additive manner, indicating that both receptors share a common fraction of a G-protein pool. In addition, stimulation of NPFF receptors in living cells modified the G-protein environment of MOP receptor by favoring its interaction with alpha(s), alpha(i2) and beta subunits. This change in G-protein coupling to MOP receptor might participate in the mechanism by which NPFF agonists reduce the inhibitory activity of opioids.

Temporal lobe epilepsy causes selective changes in mu opioid and nociceptin receptor binding and functional coupling to G-proteins in human temporal neocortex

There is no information concerning signal transduction mechanisms downstream of the opioid/nociceptin receptors in the human epileptic brain. The aim of this work was to evaluate the level of G-proteins activation mediated by DAMGO (a mu receptor selective peptide) and nociceptin, and the binding to mu and nociceptin (NOP) receptors and adenylyl cyclase (AC) in neocortex of patients with pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy associated with mesial sclerosis (MTLE) or secondary to tumor or vascular lesion showed enhanced [3H]DAMGO and [3H]forskolin binding, lower DAMGO-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and no significant changes in nociceptin-stimulated G-protein. [3H]Nociceptin binding was lower in patients with MTLE. Age of seizure onset correlated positively with [3H]DAMGO binding and DAMGO-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding, whereas epilepsy duration correlated negatively with [3H]DAMGO and [3H]nociceptin binding, and positively with [3H]forskolin binding. In conclusion, our present data obtained from neocortex of epileptic patients provide strong evidence that a) temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with alterations in mu opioid and NOP receptor binding and signal transduction mechanisms downstream of these receptors, and b) clinical aspects may play an important role on these receptor changes.

CB1 receptor-independent actions of SR141716 on G-protein signaling: coapplication with the mu-opioid agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(NMe)Phe-Gly-ol unmasks novel, pertussis toxin-insensitive opioid signaling in mu-opioid receptor-Chinese hamster ovary cells

The CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716) has been shown by many investigators to inhibit basal G-protein activity, i.e., to display inverse agonism at high concentrations. However, it is not clear whether this effect is cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-mediated. Using the ligand-stimulated [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) assay, we have found that 10 microM SR141716 slightly but significantly decreases the basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes of the wild-type and CB(1) receptor knockout mouse cortex, parental Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and CHO cells stably transfected with micro-opioid receptors, MOR-CHO. Accordingly, we conclude that the inverse agonism of SR141716 is CB(1) receptor-independent. Although the specific MOR agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(NMe)Phe-Gly-ol (DAMGO) saturably and concentration-dependently stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, SR141716 (10 microM) inhibited the basal by 25% and competitively inhibited DAMGO stimulation in the mouse cortex. In MOR-CHO membranes, DAMGO caused a 501 +/- 29% stimulation of the basal activity, which was inhibited to 456 +/- 22% by 10 microM SR141716. The inverse agonism of SR141716 was abolished, and DAMGO alone displayed weak, naloxone-insensitive stimulation, whereas the combination of DAMGO and SR141716 (10 microM each) resulted in a 169 +/- 22% stimulation of the basal activity (that was completely inhibited by the prototypic opioid antagonist naloxone) because of pertussis toxin (PTX) treatment to uncouple MORs from G(i)/G(o) proteins. SR141716 proved to bind directly to MORs with low affinity (IC(50) = 5.7 microM). These results suggest the emergence of novel, PTX-insensitive G-protein signaling that is blocked by naloxone when MORs are activated by the combination of DAMGO and SR141716.

Naloxone's pentapeptide binding site on filamin A blocks Mu opioid receptor-Gs coupling and CREB activation of acute morphine

Chronic morphine causes the mu opioid receptor (MOR) to switch its coupling from Gi/o to Gs, resulting in excitatory signaling via both Gαs and its Gβγ dimer. Ultra-low-dose naloxone (NLX) prevents this switch and attenuates opioid tolerance and dependence. This protective effect is mediated via a high-affinity interaction of NLX to a pentapeptide region in c-terminal filamin A (FLNA), a scaffolding protein interacting with MOR. In organotypic striatal slice cultures, we now show that acute morphine induces a dose-dependent Go-to-Gs coupling switch at 5 and 15 min that resolves by 1 hr. The acute Gs coupling induced by 100 µM morphine was completely prevented by co-treatment with 100 pM NLX, (+)NLX, or naltrexone (NTX), or their pentapeptide binding site (FLNA_2561–2565), which we show can act as a decoy for MOR or bind to FLNA itself. All of these co-treatments presumably prevent the MOR–FLNA interaction. Since ultra-low-dose NTX also attenuates the addictive properties of opioids, we assessed striatal cAMP production and CREB phosphorylation at S¹³³. Correlating with the Gs coupling, acute morphine induced elevated cAMP levels and a several-fold increase in pS¹³³CREB that were also completely blocked by NLX, NTX or the FLNA pentapeptide. We propose that acute, robust stimulation of MOR causes an interaction with FLNA that allows an initially transient MOR–Gs coupling, which recovers with receptor recycling but persists when MOR stimulation is repeated or prolonged. The complete prevention of this acute, morphine-induced MOR–Gs coupling by 100 pM NLX/NTX or 10 µM pentapeptide segment of FLNA further elucidates both MOR signaling and the mechanism of action of ultra-low-dose NLX or NTX in attenuating opioid tolerance, dependence and addictive potential.

Single dose of morphine produced a prolonged effect on dopamine neuron activities

Background

Clinical observation and experimental studies have indicated that a single exposure to morphine could induce tolerance and dependence. It has become a concern in clinical antinociceptive practice. However, the underling mechanism remains unknown. This study was designed to explore the changes of dopamine (DA) neuron activities in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) by employing a spectral analysis followed single morphine treatment.

Results

Acute morphine treatment significantly increased not only the firing rate and firing population but also the power of slow oscillation of DA neurons in naïve rats. These changes lasted at least for 3 days following the morphine treatment. During this period of time, responses of the DA neurons to subsequent morphine challenge were diminished. We further demonstrated a transient desensitization of opiate receptors as monitored by GTPγS binding to G-proteins. The present study provided first direct evidence for the temporal changes in the VTA DA neuron activities and opiate receptors desensitization.

Conclusion

Prolonged VTA DA neuron activation and opiate receptors desensitization followed single morphine exposure may underlie the development of dependence and tolerance that may associate with the acute analgesic tolerance and acute addiction of morphine.

Tolerance to repeated morphine administration is associated with increased potency of opioid agonists

Tolerance to the pain-relieving effects of opiates limits their clinical use. Although morphine tolerance is associated with desensitization of mu-opioid receptors, the underlying cellular mechanisms are not understood. One problem with the desensitization hypothesis is that acute morphine does not readily desensitize mu-opioid receptors in many cell types. Given that neurons in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) contribute to morphine antinociception and tolerance, an understanding of desensitization in PAG neurons is particularly relevant. Opioid activity in the PAG can be monitored with activation of G-protein-mediated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) currents. The present data show that opioids have a biphasic effect on GIRK currents in morphine tolerant rats. Opioid activation of GIRK currents is initially potentiated in morphine (EC(50)=281 nM) compared to saline (EC(50)=8.8 microM) pretreated rats as indicated by a leftward shift in the concentration-response curve for met-enkephalin (ME)-induced currents. These currents were inhibited by superfusion of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) suggesting that repeated morphine administration enhances agonist stimulation of mu-opioid receptor coupling to G-proteins. Although supersensitivity of mu-opioid receptors in the PAG is counterintuitive to the development of tolerance, peak GIRK currents from tolerant rats desensitized more than currents from saline pretreated rats (56% of peak current after 10 min compared to 15%, respectively). These data indicate that antinociceptive tolerance may be triggered by enhanced agonist potency resulting in increased desensitization of mu-opioid receptors.

The ambiguities of opioid tolerance mechanisms: barriers to pain therapeutics or new pain therapeutic possibilities

Identification of adaptations to chronic morphine that are causally associated with opioid tolerance formation has long been intensely pursued by the opioid research community. There is an impressive array of components of signaling pathways that are influenced by chronic opioid administration. This underscores the importance to tolerance mechanisms of the complex interplay of cellular adaptations that are downstream from the opioid receptor. A major impetus for this research remains the need to develop opioid agonists that are potent and efficacious activators of analgesic mechanisms without triggering opioid tolerance-producing adaptations. Implicit in most models of opioid tolerance is that their underlying mechanisms are invariant and independent of the system in which they have been observed. Reports that prior acute morphine treatment and pain could influence tolerance mechanisms were not understood on mechanistic levels and, consequently, were not incorporated into commonly used models of opioid tolerance. The recent demonstration that adenylyl cyclase/cAMP-related cellular adaptations to chronic morphine depend on cell state demonstrates that ongoing cell physiology is a critical determinant of tolerance mechanisms. The plasticity and pliability of cellular adaptations that mediate tolerance formation indicate that mechanisms underlying opioid analgesic tolerance could be a moving target. Although this might represent a daunting barrier to developing antitolerance pharmacotherapies, appreciation of this complexity could lead to the development of new pharmacotherapeutic approaches.

Oxycodone plus ultra-low-dose naltrexone attenuates neuropathic pain and associated mu-opioid receptor-Gs coupling

Both peripheral nerve injury and chronic opioid treatment can result in hyperalgesia associated with enhanced excitatory neurotransmission at the level of the spinal cord. Chronic opioid administration leads to a shift in mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-G protein coupling from G(i/o) to G(s) that can be prevented by cotreatment with an ultra-low-dose opioid antagonist. In this study, using lumbar spinal cord tissue from rats with L(5)/L(6) spinal nerve ligation (SNL), we demonstrated that SNL injury induces MOR linkage to G(s) in the damaged (ipsilateral) spinal dorsal horn. This MOR-G(s) coupling occurred without changing G(i/o) coupling levels and without changing the expression of MOR or Galpha proteins. Repeated administration of oxycodone alone or in combination with ultra-low-dose naltrexone (NTX) was assessed on the SNL-induced MOR-G(s) coupling as well as on neuropathic pain behavior. Repeated spinal oxycodone exacerbated the SNL-induced MOR-G(s) coupling, whereas ultra-low-dose NTX cotreatment slightly but significantly attenuated this G(s) coupling. Either spinal or oral administration of oxycodone plus ultra-low-dose NTX markedly enhanced the reductions in allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia produced by oxycodone alone and minimized tolerance to these effects. The MOR-G(s) coupling observed in response to SNL may in part contribute to the excitatory neurotransmission in spinal dorsal horn in neuropathic pain states. The antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of oxycodone plus ultra-low-dose NTX (Oxytrex, Pain Therapeutics, Inc., San Mateo, CA) suggest a promising new treatment for neuropathic pain.

PERSPECTIVE

The current study investigates whether Oxytrex (oxycodone with an ultra-low dose of naltrexone) alleviates mechanical and thermal hypersensitivities in an animal model of neuropathic pain over a period of 7 days, given locally or systemically. In this report, we first describe an injury-induced shift in mu-opioid receptor coupling from G(i/o) to G(s), suggesting why a mu-opioid agonist may have reduced efficacy in the nerve-injured state. These data present a novel approach to neuropathic pain therapy.

Post-adrenalectomy changes in the gene expression of specific G-protein subunits involved in morphine sensitization

There are some reports indicating that adrenalectomy significantly potentiates morphine-induced analgesia. Since G-protein subunits have an important role in morphine effects at the cellular level and the exact mechanism(s) of adrenalectomy-induced morphine sensitization has not yet been clarified, the present study was designed to determine the changes in the levels of Galphai/o, Galphas, Gbeta mRNA involved in this phenomenon. All experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats. The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold and corticosterone levels were measured by radioimmunoassay as a marker of HPA function. The dorsal half of the lumbar spinal cord was assayed for the expression of G-protein subunits using semiquantitative PCR normalized to beta-actin gene expression. Results showed that morphine not only in 3 mg/kg, but also in a sub-effective dose (2 mg/kg) could affect the nociceptive threshold and induce an analgesic response in adrenalectomized (ADX) rats while 2 mg/kg morphine did not demonstrate analgesic properties in sham-operated animals. These effects were reversed with corticosterone replacement. Morphine increased plasma corticosterone concentration in a dose-dependent manner in sham-operated rats. Following adrenalectomy a significant increase in the mRNA levels of Galphai/o (79%) and Gbeta (96%) was observed in the dorsal portion of the lumbar spinal cord. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the mRNA level of Galphas. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the levels of the cellular components involved in morphine analgesia significantly increase in ADX animals. This may be at least partly responsible for adrenalectomy-induced morphine sensitization.

Heterotrimeric G proteins and the single-transmembrane domain IGF-II/M6P receptor: functional interaction and relevance to cell signaling

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family represents the largest and most versatile group of cell surface receptors. Classical GPCR signaling constitutes ligand binding to a seven-transmembrane domain receptor, receptor interaction with a heterotrimeric G protein, and the subsequent activation or inhibition of downstream intracellular effectors to mediate a cellular response. However, recent reports on direct, receptor-independent G protein activation, G protein-independent signaling by GPCRs, and signaling of nonheptahelical receptors via trimeric G proteins have highlighted the intrinsic complexities of G protein signaling mechanisms. The insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose-6 phosphate (IGF-II/M6P) receptor is a single-transmembrane glycoprotein whose principal function is the intracellular transport of lysosomal enzymes. In addition, the receptor also mediates some biological effects in response to IGF-II binding in both neuronal and nonneuronal systems. Multidisciplinary efforts to elucidate the intracellular signaling pathways that underlie these effects have generated data to suggest that the IGF-II/M6P receptor might mediate transmembrane signaling via a G protein-coupled mechanism. The purpose of this review is to outline the characteristics of traditional and nontraditional GPCRs, to relate the IGF-II/M6P receptor's structure with its role in G protein-coupled signaling and to summarize evidence gathered over the years regarding the putative signaling of the IGF-II/M6P receptor mediated by a G protein.