Cas4 Nucleases Define the PAM, Length, and Orientation of DNA Fragments Integrated at CRISPR Loci

Molecular arms in microbial defense: Argonautes and Cas4 nucleases team up

In this issue of Molecular Cell, Bobadilla Ugarte et al.1 show that ACE1, a Cas4-family nuclease, partners with prokaryotic Argonautes to generate guide DNAs, revealing a dedicated siDNA biogenesis pathway in cyanobacterial immune systems.

Cyanobacterial Argonautes and Cas4 family nucleases cooperate to interfere with invading DNA

Prokaryotic Argonaute proteins (pAgos) from the long-A clade are stand-alone immune systems that use small interfering DNA (siDNA) guides to recognize and cleave invading plasmid and virus DNA. Certain long-A pAgos are co-encoded with accessory proteins with unknown functions. Here, we show that cyanobacterial long-A pAgos act in conjunction with Argonaute-associated Cas4 family enzyme 1 (ACE1). Structural and biochemical analyses reveal that ACE1-associated pAgos mediate siDNA-guided DNA interference, akin to stand-alone pAgos. ACE1 is structurally homologous to the nuclease domain of bacterial DNA repair complexes and acts as a single-stranded DNA endonuclease that processes siDNA guides. pAgo and ACE1 form a heterodimeric long-A pAgo-ACE1 (APACE1) complex, which modulates ACE1 activity. Although ACE1-associated pAgos alone interfere with plasmids and bacteriophages, plasmid interference is boosted when pAgo and ACE1 are co-expressed. Our study reveals that pAgo-mediated immunity is enhanced by accessory proteins and broadens our mechanistic understanding of how pAgo systems interfere with invading DNA.

Research Progress on the Mechanism and Application of the Type I CRISPR-Cas System

The CRISPR-Cas system functions as an adaptive immune mechanism in archaea and bacteria, providing defense against the invasion of foreign nucleic acids. Most CRISPR-Cas systems are classified into class 1 or class 2, with further subdivision into several subtypes. The primary distinction between class 1 and class 2 systems lies in the assembly of their effector modules. In class 1 systems, the effector complex consists of multiple proteins with distinct functions, whereas in class 2 systems, the effector is associated with a single protein. Class 1 systems account for approximately 90% of the CRISPR-Cas repertoire and are categorized into three types (type I, type IV, and type III) and 12 subtypes. To date, various CRISPR-Cas systems have been widely employed in the field of genetic engineering as essential tools and techniques for genome editing. Type I CRISPR-Cas systems remain a valuable resource for developing sophisticated application tools. This review provides a comprehensive review of the characteristics, mechanisms of action, and applications of class 1 type I CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as transposon-associated systems, offering effective approaches and insights for future research on the mechanisms of action, as well as the subsequent development and application of type I CRISPR-Cas systems.

Crosstalk between three CRISPR-Cas types enables primed type VI-A adaptation in Listeria seeligeri

CRISPR-Cas systems confer adaptive immunity to their prokaryotic hosts through the process of adaptation, where sequences are captured from foreign nucleic acids and integrated as spacers in the CRISPR array, and thereby enable crRNA-guided interference against new threats. While the Cas1-2 integrase is critical for adaptation, it is absent from many CRISPR-Cas loci, rendering the mechanism of spacer acquisition unclear for these systems. Here we show that the RNA-targeting type VI-A CRISPR system of Listeria seeligeri acquires spacers from DNA substrates through the action of a promiscuous Cas1-2 integrase encoded by a co-occurring type II-C system, in a transcription-independent manner. We further demonstrate that the type II-C integration complex is strongly stimulated by preexisting spacers in a third CRISPR system (type I-B) which imperfectly match phage targets and prime type VI-A adaptation. Altogether, our results reveal an unprecedented degree of communication among CRISPR-Cas loci encoded by a single organism.

Methanotrophic Methanoperedens archaea host diverse and interacting extrachromosomal elements

Methane emissions are mitigated by anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea, including Methanoperedens. Some Methanoperedens host huge extrachromosomal genetic elements (ECEs) called Borgs that may modulate their activity, yet the broader diversity of Methanoperedens ECEs is understudied. Here we report small enigmatic linear ECEs, circular viruses and unclassified ECEs that are predicted to replicate within Methanoperedens. Linear ECEs have inverted terminal repeats, tandem repeats and coding patterns that are strongly reminiscent of Borgs, but they are only 52-145 kb in length. As they share proteins with Borgs and Methanoperedens, we refer to them as mini-Borgs. Mini-Borgs are genetically diverse and can be assigned to at least five family-level groups. We identify eight families of Methanoperedens viruses, some of which encode multi-haem cytochromes, and circular ECEs encoding transposon-associated TnpB genes with proximal population-heterogeneous CRISPR arrays. These ECEs exchange genetic information with each other and with Methanoperedens, probably impacting their archaeal host activity and evolution.

Isolation and Characterization of Two Novel Genera of Jumbo Bacteriophages Infecting Xanthomonas vesicatoria Isolated from Agricultural Regions in Mexico

Bacterial spot is a serious disease caused by several species of Xanthomonas affecting pepper and tomato production worldwide. Since the strategies employed for disease management have been inefficient and pose a threat for environmental and human health, the development of alternative methods is gaining relevance. The aim of this study is to isolate and characterize lytic phages against Xanthomonas pathogens. Here, we isolate two jumbo phages, named XaC1 and XbC2, from water obtained from agricultural irrigation channels by the enrichment technique using X. vesicatoria as a host. We determined that both phages were specific for inducing the lysis of X. vesicatoria strains, but not of other xanthomonads. The XaC1 and XbC2 phages showed a myovirus morphology and were classified as jumbo phages due to their genomes being larger than 200 kb. Phylogenetic and comparative analysis suggests that XaC1 and XbC2 represent both different and novel genera of phages, where XaC1 possesses a low similarity to other phage genomes reported before. Finally, XaC1 and XbC2 exhibited thermal stability up to 45 °C and pH stability from 5 to 9. All these results indicate that the isolated phages are promising candidates for the development of formulations against bacterial spot, although further characterization is required.

Unraveling Exogenous DNA Processing in Cas4-Lacking Crispr Systems: A Novel Bypass Pathway Explored

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems are widely distributed adaptive immune systems found in prokaryotes. The process involves three main stages: adaptation, expression, and interference. While the adaptation stage has been extensively studied, there is still an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms underlying the capture, trimming, and integration of exogenous DNA. For instance, Cas4, a CRISPR-Cas protein with endonuclease activity, is responsible for selecting and processing protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences. However, some CRISPR isoforms lack Cas4 activity, relying on other enzymes for adaptive immunity. Recently, Wang et al. presented a novel model of exogenous DNA processing in a type I-E CRISPR system lacking Cas4 in a Nature article. This model integrates protospacer processing into CRISPR arrays through fine-tuned synthases formed by DnaQ-like exonuclease (DEDDh) and Cas1-Cas2 complexes. Their study introduces a novel model, shedding new light on the evolution of CRISPR adaptive immunity. This perspective comprehensively examines the fundamental process of CRISPR adaptive immunity, detailing both the classical pathway mediated by Cas4 and the alternative pathway mediated by DEDDh. Furthermore, a thorough evaluation of Wang et al.'s work is conducted, highlighting its strengths, weaknesses, and existing research challenges.

Diversity of Bathyarchaeia viruses in metagenomes and virus-encoded CRISPR system components

Bathyarchaeia represent a class of archaea common and abundant in sedimentary ecosystems. Here we report 56 metagenome-assembled genomes of Bathyarchaeia viruses identified in metagenomes from different environments. Gene sharing network and phylogenomic analyses led to the proposal of four virus families, including viruses of the realms Duplodnaviria and Adnaviria, and archaea-specific spindle-shaped viruses. Genomic analyses uncovered diverse CRISPR elements in these viruses. Viruses of the proposed family "Fuxiviridae" harbor an atypical Type IV-B CRISPR-Cas system and a Cas4 protein that might interfere with host immunity. Viruses of the family "Chiyouviridae" encode a Cas2-like endonuclease and two mini-CRISPR arrays, one with a repeat identical to that in the host CRISPR array, potentially allowing the virus to recruit the host CRISPR adaptation machinery to acquire spacers that could contribute to competition with other mobile genetic elements or to inhibit host defenses. These findings present an outline of the Bathyarchaeia virome and offer a glimpse into their counter-defense mechanisms.

DnaQ mediates directional spacer acquisition in the CRISPR-Cas system by a time-dependent mechanism

In the spacer acquisition stage of CRISPR-Cas immunity, spacer orientation and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) removal are two prerequisites for functional spacer integration. Cas4 has been implicated in both processing the prespacer and determining the spacer orientation. In Cas4-lacking systems, host 3'-5' DnaQ family exonucleases were recently reported to play a Cas4-like role. However, the molecular details of DnaQ functions remain elusive. Here, we characterized the spacer acquisition of the adaptation module of the Streptococcus thermophilus type I-E system, in which a DnaQ domain naturally fuses with Cas2. We presented X-ray crystal structures and cryo-electron microscopy structures of this adaptation module. Our biochemical data showed that DnaQ trimmed PAM-containing and PAM-deficient overhangs with different efficiencies. Based on these results, we proposed a time-dependent model for DnaQ-mediated spacer acquisition to elucidate PAM removal and spacer orientation determination in Cas4-lacking CRISPR-Cas systems.

Histones direct site-specific CRISPR spacer acquisition in model archaeon

CRISPR-Cas systems provide heritable immunity against viruses and other mobile genetic elements by incorporating fragments of invader DNA into the host CRISPR array as spacers. Integration of new spacers is localized to the 5' end of the array, and in certain Gram-negative Bacteria this polarized localization is accomplished by the integration host factor. For most other Bacteria and Archaea, the mechanism for 5' end localization is unknown. Here we show that archaeal histones play a key role in directing integration of CRISPR spacers. In Pyrococcus furiosus, deletion of either histone A or B impairs integration. In vitro, purified histones are sufficient to direct integration to the 5' end of the CRISPR array. Archaeal histone tetramers and bacterial integration host factor induce similar U-turn bends in bound DNA. These findings indicate a co-evolution of CRISPR arrays with chromosomal DNA binding proteins and a widespread role for binding and bending of DNA to facilitate accurate spacer integration.

Cas4/1 dual nuclease activities enable prespacer maturation and directional integration in a type I-G CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems uptake short "spacer" sequences from foreign DNA and incorporate them into the host genome to serve as templates for CRISPR RNAs that guide interference against future infections. Adaptation in CRISPR systems is mediated by Cas1-Cas2 complexes that catalyze integration of prespacer substrates into the CRISPR array. Many DNA targeting systems also require Cas4 endonucleases for functional spacer acquisition. Cas4 selects prespacers containing a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and removes the PAM prior to integration, both of which are required to ensure host immunization. Cas1 has also been shown to function as a nuclease in some systems, but a role for this nuclease activity in adaptation has not been demonstrated. We identified a type I-G Cas4/1 fusion with a nucleolytically active Cas1 domain that can directly participate in prespacer processing. The Cas1 domain is both an integrase and a sequence-independent nuclease that cleaves the non-PAM end of a prespacer, generating optimal overhang lengths that enable integration at the leader side. The Cas4 domain sequence specifically cleaves the PAM end of the prespacer, ensuring integration of the PAM end at the spacer side. The two domains have varying metal ion requirements. While Cas4 activity is Mn2+ dependent, Cas1 preferentially uses Mg2+ over Mn2+. The dual nuclease activity of Cas4/1 eliminates the need for additional factors in prespacer processing making the adaptation module self-reliant for prespacer maturation and directional integration.

Diversity of Bathyarchaeia viruses in metagenomes and virus-encoded CRISPR system components

Bathyarchaeia represent a class of archaea common and abundant in sedimentary ecosystems. The virome of Bathyarchaeia so far has not been characterized. Here we report 56 metagenome-assembled genomes of Bathyarchaeia viruses identified in metagenomes from different environments. Gene sharing network and phylogenomic analyses led to the proposal of four virus families, including viruses of the realms Duplodnaviria and Adnaviria, and archaea-specific spindle-shaped viruses. Genomic analyses uncovered diverse CRISPR elements in these viruses. Viruses of the proposed family 'Fuxiviridae' harbor an atypical type IV-B CRISPR-Cas system and a Cas4 protein that might interfere with host immunity. Viruses of the family 'Chiyouviridae' encode a Cas2-like endonuclease and two mini-CRISPR arrays, one with a repeat identical to that in the host CRISPR array, potentially allowing the virus to recruit the host CRISPR adaptation machinery to acquire spacers that could contribute to competition with other mobile genetic elements or to inhibition of host defenses. These findings present an outline of the Bathyarchaeia virome and offer a glimpse into their counter-defense mechanisms.

Cas4/1 dual nuclease activities enable prespacer maturation and directional integration in a type I-G CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems uptake short 'spacer' sequences from foreign DNA and incorporate them into the host genome to serve as templates for crRNAs that guide interference against future infections. Adaptation in CRISPR systems is mediated by Cas1-Cas2 complexes that catalyze integration of prespacer substrates into the CRISPR array. Many DNA targeting systems also require Cas4 endonucleases for functional spacer acquisition. Cas4 selects prespacers containing a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and removes the PAM prior to integration, both of which are required to ensure host immunization. Cas1 has also been shown to function as a nuclease in some systems, but a role for this nuclease activity in adaptation has not been demonstrated. We identified a type I-G Cas4/1 fusion with a nucleolytically active Cas1 domain that can directly participate in prespacer processing. The Cas1 domain is both an integrase and a sequence-independent nuclease that cleaves the non-PAM end of a prespacer, generating optimal overhang lengths that enable integration at the leader side. The Cas4 domain sequence-specifically cleaves the PAM end of the prespacer, ensuring integration of the PAM end at the spacer side. The two domains have varying metal ion requirements. While Cas4 activity is Mn 2+ dependent, Cas1 preferentially uses Mg 2+ over Mn 2+ . The dual nuclease activity of Cas4/1 eliminates the need for additional factors in prespacer processing, making the adaptation module self-reliant for prespacer maturation and directional integration.

CRISPR-Cas adaptation in Escherichia coli

Prokaryotes use the adaptive immunity mediated via the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR associated (CRISPR-Cas) system for protection against invading elements such as phages and plasmids. The immunity is achieved by capturing small DNA fragments or spacers from foreign nucleic acids (protospacers) and integrating them into the host CRISPR locus. This step of CRISPR-Cas immunity called 'naïve CRISPR adaptation' requires the conserved Cas1-Cas2 complex and is often supported by variable host proteins that assist in spacer processing and integration. Bacteria that have acquired new spacers become immune to the same invading elements when reinfected. CRISPR-Cas immunity can also be updated by integrating new spacers from the same invading elements, a process called 'primed adaptation'. Only properly selected and integrated spacers are functional in the next steps of CRISPR immunity when their processed transcripts are used for RNA-guided target recognition and interference (target degradation). Capturing, trimming, and integrating new spacers in the correct orientation are universal steps of adaptation to all CRISPR-Cas systems, but some details are CRISPR-Cas type-specific and species-specific. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas class 1 type I-E adaptation in Escherichia coli as a general model for adaptation processes (DNA capture and integration) that have been studied in detail. We focus on the role of host non-Cas proteins involved in adaptation, particularly on the role of homologous recombination.

Casposons - silent heroes of the CRISPR-Cas systems evolutionary history

Many archaeal and bacterial organisms possess an adaptive immunity system known as CRISPR-Cas. Its role is to recognize and degrade foreign DNA showing high similarity to repeats within the CRISPR array. In recent years computational techniques have been used to identify cas1 genes that are not associated with CRISPR systems, named cas1-solo. Often, cas1-solo genes are present in a conserved neighborhood of PolB-like polymerase genes, which is a characteristic feature of self-synthesizing, eukaryotic transposons of the Polinton class. Nearly all cas1-polB genomic islands are flanked by terminal inverted repeats and direct repeats which correspond to target site duplications. Considering the patchy taxonomic distribution of the identified islands in archaeal and bacterial genomes, they were characterized as a new superfamily of mobile genetic elements and called casposons. Here, we review recent experiments on casposons' mobility and discuss their discovery, classification, and evolutionary relationship with the CRISPR-Cas systems.

Molecular Details of DNA Integration by CRISPR-Associated Proteins During Adaptation in Bacteria and Archaea

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins constitute an adaptive immune system in bacteria and archaea, where immunological memory is retained in the CRISPR locus as short pieces of the intruding nucleic acid, termed spacers. The adaptation to new infections occurs through the integration of a new spacer into the CRISPR array. For immune protection, spacers are transcribed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNA) that are used to guide the effector nuclease of the system in sequence-dependent target cleavage. Spacers originate as a prespacer from either DNA or RNA depending on the CRISPR-Cas system being observed, and the nearly universal Cas proteins, Cas1 and Cas2, insert the prespacer into the CRISPR locus during adaptation in all systems that contain them. The mechanism of site-specific prespacer integration varies across CRISPR classes and types, and distinct differences can even be found within the same subtype. In this review, the current knowledge on the mechanisms of prespacer integration in type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems will be described. Comparisons of the currently characterized type II-A systems show that distinct mechanisms exist within different members of this subtype and are correlated to sequence-specific interactions of Cas proteins and the DNA elements present in the CRISPR array. These observations indicate that nature has fine-tuned the mechanistic details while performing the basic step of DNA integration by Cas proteins, which offers unique advantages to develop Cas1-Cas2-based biotechnology.

PAM binding ensures orientational integration during Cas4-Cas1-Cas2-mediated CRISPR adaptation

Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas systems immunizes bacteria and archaea against mobile genetic elements. In many DNA-targeting systems, the Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 complex is required for selection and processing of DNA segments containing PAM sequences prior to integration of these "prespacer" substrates as spacers in the CRISPR array. We determined cryo-EM structures of the Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 adaptation complex from the type I-C system that encodes standalone Cas1 and Cas4 proteins. The structures reveal how Cas4 specifically reads out bases within the PAM sequence and how interactions with both Cas1 and Cas2 activate Cas4 endonuclease activity. The Cas4-PAM interaction ensures tight binding between the adaptation complex and the prespacer, significantly enhancing integration of the non-PAM end into the CRISPR array and ensuring correct spacer orientation. Corroborated with our biochemical results, Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 structures with substrates representing various stages of CRISPR adaptation reveal a temporally resolved mechanism for maturation and integration of functional spacers into the CRISPR array.

Hyper-stimulation of Pyrococcus furiosus CRISPR DNA uptake by a self-transmissible plasmid

Pyrococcus furiosus is a hyperthermophilic archaeon with three effector CRISPR complexes (types I-A, I-B, and III-B) that each employ crRNAs derived from seven CRISPR arrays. Here, we investigate the CRISPR adaptation response to a newly discovered and self-transmissible plasmid, pT33.3. Transconjugant strains of Pyrococcus furiosus exhibited dramatically elevated levels of new spacer integration at CRISPR loci relative to the strain harboring a commonly employed, laboratory-constructed plasmid. High-throughput sequence analysis demonstrated that the vast majority of the newly acquired spacers were preferentially selected from DNA surrounding a particular region of the pT33.3 plasmid and exhibited a bi-directional pattern of strand bias that is a hallmark of primed adaptation by type I systems. We observed that one of the CRISPR arrays of our Pyrococcus furiosus laboratory strain encodes a spacer that closely matches the region of the conjugative plasmid that is targeted for adaptation. The hyper-adaptation phenotype was found to strictly depend both on the presence of this single matching spacer as well as the I-B effector complex, known to mediate primed adaptation. Our results indicate that Pyrococcus furiosus naturally encountered this conjugative plasmid or a related mobile genetic element in the past and responds to reinfection with robust primed adaptation.

Adaptation by Type V-A and V-B CRISPR-Cas Systems Demonstrates Conserved Protospacer Selection Mechanisms Between Diverse CRISPR-Cas Types

Adaptation of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) arrays is a crucial process responsible for the unique, adaptive nature of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. The acquisition of new CRISPR spacers from mobile genetic elements has previously been studied for several types of CRISPR-Cas systems. In this study, we used a high-throughput sequencing approach to characterize CRISPR adaptation of the type V-A system from Francisella novicida and the type V-B system from Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. In contrast to other class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, we found that for the type V-A and V-B systems, the Cas12 nucleases are dispensable for spacer acquisition, with only Cas1 and Cas2 (type V-A) or Cas4/1 and Cas2 (type V-B) being necessary and sufficient. Whereas the catalytic activity of Cas4 is not essential for adaptation, Cas4 activity is required for correct protospacer adjacent motif selection in both systems and for prespacer trimming in type V-A. In addition, we provide evidence for acquisition of RecBCD-produced DNA fragments by both systems, but with spacers derived from foreign DNA being incorporated preferentially over those derived from the host chromosome. Our work shows that several spacer acquisition mechanisms are conserved between diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, but also highlights unexpected nuances between similar systems that generally contribute to a bias of gaining immunity against invading genetic elements.

Adaptation by Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems: Breakthrough Findings and Open Questions

CRISPR-Cas systems acquire heritable defense memory against invading nucleic acids through adaptation. Type III CRISPR-Cas systems have unique and intriguing features of defense and are important in method development for Genetics research. We started to understand the common and unique properties of type III CRISPR-Cas adaptation in recent years. This review summarizes our knowledge regarding CRISPR-Cas adaptation with the emphasis on type III systems and discusses open questions for type III adaptation studies.

Different modes of spacer acquisition by the Staphylococcus epidermidis type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR-Cas systems provide prokaryotic organisms with an adaptive defense mechanism that acquires immunological memories of infections. This is accomplished by integration of short fragments from the genome of invaders such as phages and plasmids, called ‘spacers’, into the CRISPR locus of the host. Depending on their genetic composition, CRISPR-Cas systems can be classified into six types, I-VI, however spacer acquisition has been extensively studied only in type I and II systems. Here, we used an inducible spacer acquisition assay to study this process in the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Staphylococcus epidermidis, in the absence of phage selection. Similarly to type I and II spacer acquisition, this type III system uses Cas1 and Cas2 to preferentially integrate spacers from the chromosomal terminus and free dsDNA ends produced after DNA breaks, in a manner that is enhanced by the AddAB DNA repair complex. Surprisingly, a different mode of spacer acquisition from rRNA and tRNA loci, which spans only the transcribed sequences of these genes and is not enhanced by AddAB, was also detected. Therefore, our findings reveal both common mechanistic principles that may be conserved in all CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as unique and intriguing features of type III spacer acquisition.

Type I CRISPR-Cas provides robust immunity but incomplete attenuation of phage-induced cellular stress

During infection, phages manipulate bacteria to redirect metabolism towards viral proliferation. To counteract phages, some bacteria employ CRISPR-Cas systems that provide adaptive immunity. While CRISPR-Cas mechanisms have been studied extensively, their effects on both the phage and the host during phage infection remains poorly understood. Here, we analysed the infection of Serratia by a siphovirus (JS26) and the transcriptomic response with, or without type I-E or I-F CRISPR-Cas immunity. In non-immune Serratia, phage infection altered bacterial metabolism by upregulating anaerobic respiration and amino acid biosynthesis genes, while flagella production was suppressed. Furthermore, phage proliferation required a late-expressed viral Cas4 homologue, which did not influence CRISPR adaptation. While type I-E and I-F immunity provided robust defence against phage infection, phage development still impacted the bacterial host. Moreover, DNA repair and SOS response pathways were upregulated during type I immunity. We also discovered that the type I-F system is controlled by a positive autoregulatory feedback loop that is activated upon phage targeting during type I-F immunity, leading to a controlled anti-phage response. Overall, our results provide new insight into phage-host dynamics and the impact of CRISPR immunity within the infected cell.

Unique properties of spacer acquisition by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems have a unique mode of interference, involving crRNA-guided recognition of nascent RNA and leading to DNA and RNA degradation. How type III systems acquire new CRISPR spacers is currently not well understood. Here, we characterize CRISPR spacer uptake by a type III-A system within its native host, Streptococcus thermophilus. Adaptation by the type II-A system in the same host provided a basis for comparison. Cas1 and Cas2 proteins were critical for type III adaptation but deletion of genes responsible for crRNA biogenesis or interference did not detectably change spacer uptake patterns, except those related to host counter-selection. Unlike the type II-A system, type III spacers are acquired in a PAM- and orientation-independent manner. Interestingly, certain regions of plasmids and the host genome were particularly well-sampled during type III-A, but not type II-A, spacer uptake. These regions included the single-stranded origins of rolling-circle replicating plasmids, rRNA and tRNA encoding gene clusters, promoter regions of expressed genes and 5′ UTR regions involved in transcription attenuation. These features share the potential to form DNA secondary structures, suggesting a preferred substrate for type III adaptation. Lastly, the type III-A system adapted to and protected host cells from lytic phage infection.

CRISPR Gene Editing in Lipid Disorders and Atherosclerosis: Mechanisms and Opportunities

Elevated circulating concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) have been conclusively demonstrated in epidemiological and intervention studies to be causally associated with the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Enormous advances in LDL-C reduction have been achieved through the use of statins, and in recent years, through drugs targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a key regulator of the hepatic LDL-receptor. Existing approaches to PCSK9 targeting have used monoclonal antibodies or RNA interference. Although these approaches do not require daily dosing, as statins do, repeated subcutaneous injections are nevertheless necessary to maintain effectiveness over time. Recent experimental studies suggest that clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene-editing targeted at PCSK9 may represent a promising tool to achieve the elusive goal of a 'fire and forget' lifelong approach to LDL-C reduction. This paper will provide an overview of CRISPR technology, with a particular focus on recent studies with relevance to its potential use in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

The CRISPR-associated Cas4 protein from Leptospira interrogans demonstrate versatile nuclease activity

The Cas4 protein is one of the core CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins implicated in the adaptation module in many variants of the CRISPR-Cas system in prokaryotes against the invading genetic elements. Cas4 is recognized as a DNA exonuclease that contains a RecB nuclease domain and a Fe-S cluster-binding module. In Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni strain Fiocruz L1-130, the cas4 gene is functionally transcribed as an active component of the CRISPR-Cas I-B system. Investigation of nuclease activity of Cas4 (LinCas4) of the L. interrogans illustrated divalent-metal cofactor (Mn2+ or Mg2+) dependent endonuclease activity on the DNA substrate. In agreement, mutation of the selective metal interacting residues (Asp74 and Glu87) curtails the DNA cleavage activity in LinCas4. Computational modeling shows metal-ion interacting residues (Asp74 and Glu87) in the LinCas4 to be a part of the RecB motifs II and III, the same as other Cas4 orthologs. The mutation of a potential DNA interacting residue in the LinCas4 (LinCas4Y132A) or one of the four cysteine residues (LinCas4C18A) involved in coordinating the 4Fe-4S cluster did not perturb its DNase activity. Iron chelation assay of the purified LinCas4 demonstrated it in the apostate conformation. Reconstitution of the Fe-S cluster in the LinCas4 under in vitro condition displayed its coordination with four iron atoms per LinCas4 monomer and was confirmed by the UV and CD spectroscopy studies.

Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology

A long time has passed since regularly interspaced DNA repeats were discovered in prokaryotes. Today, those enigmatic repetitive elements termed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) are acknowledged as an emblematic part of multicomponent CRISPR-Cas (CRISPR associated) systems. These systems are involved in a variety of roles in bacteria and archaea, notably, that of conferring protection against transmissible genetic elements through an adaptive immune-like response. This review summarises the present knowledge on the diversity, molecular mechanisms and biology of CRISPR-Cas. We pay special attention to the most recent findings related to the determinants and consequences of CRISPR-Cas activity. Research on the basic features of these systems illustrates how instrumental the study of prokaryotes is for understanding biology in general, ultimately providing valuable tools for diverse fields and fuelling research beyond the mainstream.

Mechanism for Cas4-assisted directional spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas

Prokaryotes adapt to challenges from mobile genetic elements by integrating spacers derived from foreign DNA in the CRISPR array¹. Spacer insertion is carried out by the Cas1-Cas2 integrase complex^2-4. A substantial fraction of CRISPR-Cas systems use a Fe-S cluster containing Cas4 nuclease to ensure that spacers are acquired from DNA flanked by a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)^5,6 and inserted into the CRISPR array unidirectionally, so that the transcribed CRISPR RNA can guide target searching in a PAM-dependent manner. Here we provide a high-resolution mechanistic explanation for the Cas4-assisted PAM selection, spacer biogenesis and directional integration by type I-G CRISPR in Geobacter sulfurreducens, in which Cas4 is naturally fused with Cas1, forming Cas4/Cas1. During biogenesis, only DNA duplexes possessing a PAM-embedded 3'-overhang trigger Cas4/Cas1-Cas2 assembly. During this process, the PAM overhang is specifically recognized and sequestered, but is not cleaved by Cas4. This 'molecular constipation' prevents the PAM-side prespacer from participating in integration. Lacking such sequestration, the non-PAM overhang is trimmed by host nucleases and integrated to the leader-side CRISPR repeat. Half-integration subsequently triggers PAM cleavage and Cas4 dissociation, allowing spacer-side integration. Overall, the intricate molecular interaction between Cas4 and Cas1-Cas2 selects PAM-containing prespacers for integration and couples the timing of PAM processing with the stepwise integration to establish directionality.

PAM-repeat associations and spacer selection preferences in single and co-occurring CRISPR-Cas systems

BACKGROUND

The adaptive CRISPR-Cas immune system stores sequences from past invaders as spacers in CRISPR arrays and thereby provides direct evidence that links invaders to hosts. Mapping CRISPR spacers has revealed many aspects of CRISPR-Cas biology, including target requirements such as the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). However, studies have so far been limited by a low number of mapped spacers in the database.

RESULTS

By using vast metagenomic sequence databases, we map approximately one-third of more than 200,000 unique CRISPR spacers from a variety of microbes and derive a catalog of more than two hundred unique PAM sequences associated with specific CRISPR-Cas subtypes. These PAMs are further used to correctly assign the orientation of CRISPR arrays, revealing conserved patterns between the last nucleotides of the CRISPR repeat and PAM. We could also deduce CRISPR-Cas subtype-specific preferences for targeting either template or coding strand of open reading frames. While some DNA-targeting systems (type I-E and type II systems) prefer the template strand and avoid mRNA, other DNA- and RNA-targeting systems (types I-A and I-B and type III systems) prefer the coding strand and mRNA. In addition, we find large-scale evidence that both CRISPR-Cas adaptation machinery and CRISPR arrays are shared between different CRISPR-Cas systems. This could lead to simultaneous DNA and RNA targeting of invaders, which may be effective at combating mobile genetic invaders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has broad implications for our understanding of how CRISPR-Cas systems work in a wide range of organisms for which only the genome sequence is known.

Functional Identification of the Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Type I-C CRISPR-Cas System and Its Potential in Gene Editing Application

The type I clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system is one of five adaptive immune systems and exists widely in bacteria and archaea. In this study, we showed that Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) possesses a functional CRISPR system by engineering constructs mimicking its CRISPR cassette. CRISPR array analysis showed that the TTC at the 5'-end of the target sequence is a functional protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) of CRISPR. Guide RNA (gRNA) deletion analysis identified a minimum of 27-bp spacer that was required to ensure successful self-target killing in PXO99^A strain. Mutants with deletion of individual Cas genes were constructed to analyze the effects of Cas proteins on mature CRISPR RNA (crRNA), processing intermediates and DNA interference. Results showed that depleting each of the three genes, cas5d, csd1, and csd2 inactivated the pre-crRNA processing, whereas inactivation of cas3 impaired in processing pre-crRNA. Furthermore, the Xoo CRISPR/Cas system was functional in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Collectively, our results would contribute to the functional study of CRISPR/Cas system of Xoo, and also provide a new vision on the use of bacterial endogenous systems as a convenient tool for gene editing.

Disintegration promotes protospacer integration by the Cas1-Cas2 complex

‘Disintegration’—the reversal of transposon DNA integration at a target site—is regarded as an abortive off-pathway reaction. Here, we challenge this view with a biochemical investigation of the mechanism of protospacer insertion, which is mechanistically analogous to DNA transposition, by the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas1-Cas2 complex. In supercoiled target sites, the predominant outcome is the disintegration of one-ended insertions that fail to complete the second integration event. In linear target sites, one-ended insertions far outnumber complete protospacer insertions. The second insertion event is most often accompanied by the disintegration of the first, mediated either by the 3′-hydroxyl exposed during integration or by water. One-ended integration intermediates may mature into complete spacer insertions via DNA repair pathways that are also involved in transposon mobility. We propose that disintegration-promoted integration is functionally important in the adaptive phase of CRISPR-mediated bacterial immunity, and perhaps in other analogous transposition reactions.

Cas4-Cas1 Is a Protospacer Adjacent Motif-Processing Factor Mediating Half-Site Spacer Integration During CRISPR Adaptation

The immunization of bacteria and archaea against invading viruses via CRISPR adaptation is critically reliant on the efficient capture, accurate processing, and integration of CRISPR spacers into the host genome. The adaptation proteins Cas1 and Cas2 are sufficient for successful spacer acquisition in some CRISPR-Cas systems. However, many CRISPR-Cas systems additionally require the Cas4 protein for efficient adaptation. Cas4 has been implied in the selection and processing of spacer precursors, but the detailed mechanistic understanding of how Cas4 contributes to CRISPR adaptation is lacking. Here, we biochemically reconstitute the CRISPR-Cas type I-D adaptation system and show two functionally distinct adaptation complexes: Cas4-Cas1 and Cas1-Cas2. The Cas4-Cas1 complex recognizes and cleaves protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences in 3' overhangs in a sequence-specific manner, while the Cas1-Cas2 complex defines the cleavage of non-PAM sites via host-factor nucleases. Both sub-complexes are capable of mediating half-site integration, facilitating the integration of processed spacers in the correct interference-proficient orientation. We provide a model in which an asymmetric adaptation complex differentially acts on PAM- and non-PAM-containing overhangs, providing cues for the correct orientation of spacer integration.

Type II anti-CRISPR proteins as a new tool for synthetic biology

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas (CRISPR-associated proteins) system represents, in prokaryotes, an adaptive and inheritable immune response against invading DNA. The discovery of anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs), which are inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas, mainly encoded by phages and prophages, showed a co-evolution history between prokaryotes and phages. In the past decade, the CRISPR-Cas systems together with the corresponding Acrs have been turned into a genetic-engineering tool. Among the six types of CRISPR-Cas characterized so far, type II CRISPR-Cas system is the most popular in biotechnology. Here, we discuss about the discovery, the reported inhibitory mechanisms, and the applications in both gene editing and gene transcriptional regulation of type II Acrs. Moreover, we provide insights into future potential research and feasible applications.

A distinct structure of Cas1-Cas2 complex provides insights into the mechanism for the longer spacer acquisition in Pyrococcus furiosus

In the adaptation stage of CRISPR-Cas systems, the Cas1-Cas2 integrase captures and integrates new invader-derived spacers into the CRISPR locus, serving as a molecular memory of prior infection. As of yet, the structural information of Cas1-Cas2 complex is available only for two species. Here we present the crystal structure of Cas1-Cas2 complex of Pyrococcus furiosus, which showed a distinct architecture from the known Cas1-Cas2 complexes. The shorter C-terminal tail of Pfu Cas2 directs the Cas1 dimers go in the opposite direction, resulting in a different prespacer binding mode. Based on our structural and mutagenesis results, we modeled a prespacer with a shorter duplex and longer 3' overhangs to bind Pfu Cas1-Cas2 complex. The prespacer preference was confirmed by EMSA, fluorescence polarization, and in vitro integration assays. This model provides a potential explanation for the longer spacer acquisition observed in P. furiosus when deleting both cas4 genes. Our study highlights the diversity of the CRISPR adaptation module.

Virus-induced cell gigantism and asymmetric cell division in archaea

Archaeal viruses represent one of the most mysterious parts of the global virosphere, with many virus groups sharing no evolutionary relationship to viruses of bacteria or eukaryotes. How these viruses interact with their hosts remains largely unexplored. Here we show that nonlytic lemon-shaped virus STSV2 interferes with the cell cycle control of its host, hyperthermophilic and acidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus islandicus, arresting the cell cycle in the S phase. STSV2 infection leads to transcriptional repression of the cell division machinery, which is homologous to the eukaryotic endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) system. The infected cells grow up to 20-fold larger in size, have 8,000-fold larger volume compared to noninfected cells, and accumulate massive amounts of viral and cellular DNA. Whereas noninfected Sulfolobus cells divide symmetrically by binary fission, the STSV2-infected cells undergo asymmetric division, whereby giant cells release normal-sized cells by budding, resembling the division of budding yeast. Reinfection of the normal-sized cells produces a new generation of giant cells. If the CRISPR-Cas system is present, the giant cells acquire virus-derived spacers and terminate the virus spread, whereas in its absence, the cycle continues, suggesting that CRISPR-Cas is the primary defense system in Sulfolobus against STSV2. Collectively, our results show how an archaeal virus manipulates the cell cycle, transforming the cell into a giant virion-producing factory.

Pruning and Tending Immune Memories: Spacer Dynamics in the CRISPR Array

CRISPR-Cas (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR-associated genes) is a type of prokaryotic immune system that is unique in its ability to provide sequence-specific adaptive protection, which can be updated in response to new threats. CRISPR-Cas does this by storing fragments of DNA from invading genetic elements in an array interspersed with short repeats. The CRISPR array can be continuously updated through integration of new DNA fragments (termed spacers) at one end, but over time existing spacers become obsolete. To optimize immunity, spacer uptake, residency, and loss must be regulated. This mini-review summarizes what is known about how spacers are organized, maintained, and lost from CRISPR arrays.

Mechanisms of spacer acquisition by sequential assembly of the adaptation module in Synechocystis

CRISPR–Cas immune systems process and integrate short fragments of DNA from new invaders as spacers into the host CRISPR locus to establish molecular memory of prior infection, which is also known as adaptation in the field. Some CRISPR–Cas systems rely on Cas1 and Cas2 to complete the adaptation process, which has been characterized in a few systems. In contrast, many other CRISPR–Cas systems require an additional factor of Cas4 for efficient adaptation, the mechanism of which remains less understood. Here we present biochemical reconstitution of the Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 type I-D adaptation system, X-ray crystal structures of Cas1–Cas2–prespacer complexes, and negative stained electron microscopy structure of the Cas4–Cas1 complex. Cas4 and Cas2 compete with each other to interact with Cas1. In the absence of prespacer, Cas4 but not Cas2 assembles with Cas1 into a very stable complex for processing the prespacer. Strikingly, the Cas1-prespacer complex develops a higher binding affinity toward Cas2 to form the Cas1–Cas2–prespacer ternary complex for integration. Together, we show a two-step sequential assembly mechanism for the type I-D adaptation module of Synechocystis, in which Cas4–Cas1 and Cas1–Cas2 function as two exclusive complexes for prespacer processing, capture, and integration.

Molecular Mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas Immunity in Bacteria

Prokaryotes have developed numerous defense strategies to combat the constant threat posed by the diverse genetic parasites that endanger them. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas loci guard their hosts with an adaptive immune system against foreign nucleic acids. Protection starts with an immunization phase, in which short pieces of the invader's genome, known as spacers, are captured and integrated into the CRISPR locus after infection. Next, during the targeting phase, spacers are transcribed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) that guide CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases to destroy the invader's DNA or RNA. Here we describe the many different molecular mechanisms of CRISPR targeting and how they are interconnected with the immunization phase through a third phase of the CRISPR-Cas immune response: primed spacer acquisition. In this phase, Cas proteins direct the crRNA-guided acquisition of additional spacers to achieve a more rapid and robust immunization of the population.

Heavily Armed Ancestors: CRISPR Immunity and Applications in Archaea with a Comparative Analysis of CRISPR Types in Sulfolobales

Prokaryotes are constantly coping with attacks by viruses in their natural environments and therefore have evolved an impressive array of defense systems. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is an adaptive immune system found in the majority of archaea and about half of bacteria which stores pieces of infecting viral DNA as spacers in genomic CRISPR arrays to reuse them for specific virus destruction upon a second wave of infection. In detail, small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) are transcribed from CRISPR arrays and incorporated into type-specific CRISPR effector complexes which further degrade foreign nucleic acids complementary to the crRNA. This review gives an overview of CRISPR immunity to newcomers in the field and an update on CRISPR literature in archaea by comparing the functional mechanisms and abundances of the diverse CRISPR types. A bigger fraction is dedicated to the versatile and prevalent CRISPR type III systems, as tremendous progress has been made recently using archaeal models in discerning the controlled molecular mechanisms of their unique tripartite mode of action including RNA interference, DNA interference and the unique cyclic-oligoadenylate signaling that induces promiscuous RNA shredding by CARF-domain ribonucleases. The second half of the review spotlights CRISPR in archaea outlining seminal in vivo and in vitro studies in model organisms of the euryarchaeal and crenarchaeal phyla, including the application of CRISPR-Cas for genome editing and gene silencing. In the last section, a special focus is laid on members of the crenarchaeal hyperthermophilic order Sulfolobales by presenting a thorough comparative analysis about the distribution and abundance of CRISPR-Cas systems, including arrays and spacers as well as CRISPR-accessory proteins in all 53 genomes available to date. Interestingly, we find that CRISPR type III and the DNA-degrading CRISPR type I complexes co-exist in more than two thirds of these genomes. Furthermore, we identified ring nuclease candidates in all but two genomes and found that they generally co-exist with the above-mentioned CARF domain ribonucleases Csx1/Csm6. These observations, together with published literature allowed us to draft a working model of how CRISPR-Cas systems and accessory proteins cross talk to establish native CRISPR anti-virus immunity in a Sulfolobales cell.

Primed CRISPR DNA uptake in Pyrococcus furiosus

CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems are used by prokaryotes to defend against invaders like viruses and other mobile genetic elements. Immune memories are stored in the form of 'spacers' which are short DNA sequences that are captured from invaders and added to the CRISPR array during a process called 'adaptation'. Spacers are transcribed and the resulting CRISPR (cr)RNAs assemble with different Cas proteins to form effector complexes that recognize matching nucleic acid and destroy it ('interference'). Adaptation can be 'naïve', i.e. independent of any existing spacer matches, or it can be 'primed', i.e. spurred by the crRNA-mediated detection of a complete or partial match to an invader sequence. Here we show that primed adaptation occurs in Pyrococcus furiosus. Although P. furiosus has three distinct CRISPR-Cas interference systems (I-B, I-A and III-B), only the I-B system and Cas3 were necessary for priming. Cas4, which is important for selection and processing of new spacers in naïve adaptation, was also essential for priming. Loss of either the I-B effector proteins or Cas3 reduced naïve adaptation. However, when Cas3 and all crRNP genes were deleted, uptake of correctly processed spacers was observed, indicating that none of these interference proteins are necessary for naïve adaptation.

CRISPR-Associated Factor Csa3b Regulates CRISPR Adaptation and Cmr-Mediated RNA Interference in Sulfolobus islandicus

Acquisition of spacers confers the CRISPR–Cas system with the memory to defend against invading mobile genetic elements. We previously reported that the CRISPR-associated factor Csa3a triggers CRISPR adaptation in Sulfolobus islandicus. However, a feedback regulation of CRISPR adaptation remains unclear. Here we show that another CRISPR-associated factor, Csa3b, binds a cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) analog (5′-CAAAA-3′) and mutation at its CARF domain, which reduces the binding affinity. Csa3b also binds the promoter of adaptation cas genes, and the cOA analog enhances their binding probably by allosteric regulation. Deletion of the csa3b gene triggers spacer acquisition from both plasmid and viral DNAs, indicating that Csa3b acted as a repressor for CRISPR adaptation. Moreover, we also find that Csa3b activates the expression of subtype cmr-α and cmr-β genes according to transcriptome data and demonstrate that Csa3b binds the promoters of cmr genes. The deletion of the csa3b gene reduces Cmr-mediated RNA interference activity, indicating that Csa3b acts as a transcriptional activator for Cmr-mediated RNA interference. In summary, our findings reveal a novel pathway for the regulation of CRISPR adaptation and CRISPR–Cmr RNA interference in S. islandicus. Our results also suggest a feedback repression of CRIPSR adaptation by the Csa3b factor and the cOA signal produced by the Cmr complex at the CRISPR interference stage.

CRISPR type II-A subgroups exhibit phylogenetically distinct mechanisms for prespacer insertion

CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive immune system that protects prokaryotes against foreign nucleic acids. Prokaryotes gain immunity by acquiring short pieces of the invading nucleic acid termed prespacers and inserting them into their CRISPR array. In type II-A systems, Cas1 and Cas2 proteins insert prespacers always at the leader-repeat junction of the CRISPR array. Among type II-A CRISPR systems, three distinct groups (G1, G2, and G3) exist according to the extent of DNA sequence conservation at the 3' end of the leader. However, the mechanisms by which these conserved motifs interact with their cognate Cas1 and Cas2 proteins remain unclear. Here, we performed in vitro integration assays, finding that for G1 and G2, the insertion site is recognized through defined mechanisms, at least in members examined to date, whereas G3 exhibits no sequence-specific insertion. G1 first recognized a 12-bp sequence at the leader-repeat junction and performed leader-side insertion before proceeding to spacer-side insertion. G2 recognized the full repeat sequence and could perform independent leader-side or spacer-side insertions, although the leader-side insertion was faster than spacer-side. The prespacer morphology requirements for Cas1-Cas2 varied, with G1 stringently requiring a 5-nucleotide 3' overhang and G2 being able to insert many forms of prespacers with variable efficiencies. These results highlight the intricacy of protein-DNA sequence interactions within the seemingly similar type II-A integration complexes and provide mechanistic insights into prespacer insertion. These interactions can be fine-tuned to expand the Cas1-Cas2 toolset for inserting small DNAs into diverse DNA targets.

CRISPR adaptation from a structural perspective

Bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems provide adaptive immunity against viruses and other mobile genome elements. During the adaptation step cells become immunized by insertion of short fragments of foreign DNA, termed spacers, into the genomic region called a CRISPR array. Selection, processing and insertion of new spacers is an elaborate and precisely orchestrated reaction, which relies on the Cas1-Cas2 integrase complex and accessory proteins that vary among different types of CRISPR-Cas systems. This review focuses on CRISPR adaptation from the structural perspective, with the spotlight on adaptation proteins employed by type I and type II CRISPR-Cas systems.

A short overview of the CRISPR-Cas adaptation stage

CRISPR research began over 30 years ago with the incidental discovery of an unusual nucleotide arrangement in the Escherichia coli genome. It took 20 years to find the main function of CRISPR-Cas systems as an adaptive defence mechanism against invading nucleic acids, and our knowledge of their biology has steadily increased ever since. In parallel, the number of applications derived from CRISPR-Cas systems has risen spectacularly. The CRISPR-based genome editing tool is arguably the most exciting application in both basic and applied research. Lately, CRISPR-Cas research has partially shifted to the least understood aspect of its biology: the ability of CRISPR-Cas systems to acquire new immunities during the so-called adaptation step. To date, the most efficient natural system to readily acquire new spacers is the type II-A system of the gram-positive dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. The discovery of additional systems able to acquire new spacers will hopefully draw more attention to this step of CRISPR-Cas biology. This review focuses on the breakthroughs that have helped to unravel the adaptation phase and on questions that remain to be answered.

Regulation of the RNA and DNA nuclease activities required for Pyrococcus furiosus Type III-B CRISPR-Cas immunity

Type III CRISPR-Cas prokaryotic immune systems provide anti-viral and anti-plasmid immunity via a dual mechanism of RNA and DNA destruction. Upon target RNA interaction, Type III crRNP effector complexes become activated to cleave both target RNA (via Cas7) and target DNA (via Cas10). Moreover, trans-acting endoribonucleases, Csx1 or Csm6, can promote the Type III immune response by destroying both invader and host RNAs. Here, we characterize how the RNase and DNase activities associated with Type III-B immunity in Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) are regulated by target RNA features and second messenger signaling events. In vivo mutational analyses reveal that either the DNase activity of Cas10 or the RNase activity of Csx1 can effectively direct successful anti-plasmid immunity. Biochemical analyses confirmed that the Cas10 Palm domains convert ATP into cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) compounds that activate the ribonuclease activity of Pfu Csx1. Furthermore, we show that the HEPN domain of the adenosine-specific endoribonuclease, Pfu Csx1, degrades cOA signaling molecules to provide an auto-inhibitory off-switch of Csx1 activation. Activation of both the DNase and cOA generation activities require target RNA binding and recognition of distinct target RNA 3' protospacer flanking sequences. Our results highlight the complex regulatory mechanisms controlling Type III CRISPR immunity.

Real-time observation of CRISPR spacer acquisition by Cas1-Cas2 integrase

Cas1 integrase associates with Cas2 to insert short DNA fragments into a CRISPR array, establishing nucleic acid memory in prokaryotes. Here we applied single-molecule FRET methods to the Enterococcus faecalis (Efa) Cas1–Cas2 system to establish a kinetic framework describing target-searching, integration, and post-synapsis events. EfaCas1–Cas2 on its own is not able to find the CRISPR repeat in the CRISPR array; it only does so after prespacer loading. The leader sequence adjacent to the repeat further stabilizes EfaCas1–Cas2 contacts, enabling leader-side integration and subsequent spacer-side integration. The resulting post-synaptic complex has a surprisingly short mean lifetime. Remarkably, transcription efficiently resolves the postsynaptic complex and we predict that this is a conserved mechanism that ensures efficient and directional spacer integration in many CRISPR systems. Overall, our study provides a complete model of spacer acquisition, which can be harnessed for DNA-based information storage and cell lineage tracing technologies.

Avoidance of Self during CRISPR Immunization

The battle between microbes and their viruses is ancient and ongoing. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) immunity, the first and, to date, only form of adaptive immunity found in prokaryotes, represents a flexible mechanism to recall past infections while also adapting to a changing pathogenic environment. Critical to the role of CRISPR as an adaptive immune mechanism is its capacity for self versus non-self recognition when acquiring novel immune memories. Yet, CRISPR systems vary widely in both how and to what degree they can distinguish foreign from self-derived genetic material. We document known and hypothesized mechanisms that bias the acquisition of immune memory towards non-self targets. We demonstrate that diversity is the rule, with many widespread but no universal mechanisms for self versus non-self recognition.

Detection of CRISPR adaptation

Prokaryotic adaptive immunity is built when short DNA fragments called spacers are acquired into CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) arrays. CRISPR adaptation is a multistep process which comprises selection, generation, and incorporation of prespacers into arrays. Once adapted, spacers provide immunity through the recognition of complementary nucleic acid sequences, channeling them for destruction. To prevent deleterious autoimmunity, CRISPR adaptation must therefore be a highly regulated and infrequent process, at least in the absence of genetic invaders. Over the years, ingenious methods to study CRISPR adaptation have been developed. In this paper, we discuss and compare methods that detect CRISPR adaptation and its intermediates in vivo and propose suppressing PCR as a simple modification of a popular assay to monitor spacer acquisition with increased sensitivity.