1
|
Pazhayam NM, Sagar S, Sekelsky J. Suppression of meiotic crossovers in pericentromeric heterochromatin requires synaptonemal complex and meiotic recombination factors in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2025; 229:iyaf029. [PMID: 39996709 PMCID: PMC12005251 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyaf029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
The centromere effect (CE) is a meiotic phenomenon that ensures meiotic crossover suppression in pericentromeric regions. Despite being a critical safeguard against nondisjunction, the mechanisms behind the CE remain unknown. Previous studies found that different regions of the Drosophila pericentromere, encompassing proximal euchromatin, beta, and alpha heterochromatin, undergo varying levels of crossover suppression, raising the question of whether distinct mechanisms establish the CE in different regions. We asked whether different pericentromeric regions respond differently to mutations that impair features that may play a role in the CE. In flies with a mutation that affects the synaptonemal complex (SC), a structure that is hypothesized to have roles in recombination and crossover patterning, we observed a redistribution of pericentromeric crossovers from proximal euchromatin towards beta heterochromatin but not alpha heterochromatin, indicating a role for the SC in suppressing crossovers in beta heterochromatin. In flies mutant for mei-218 or rec, which encode components of a critical pro-crossover complex, there was a more extreme redistribution of pericentromeric crossovers towards both beta and alpha heterochromatin, suggesting an important role for these meiotic recombination factors in suppressing heterochromatic crossovers. We mapped crossovers in flies mutant for Su(var)3-9, which encodes histone H3-lysine-9 methyltransferase. Although we expected strong alleviation of crossover suppression in heterochromatin, no changes in pericentromeric crossover distribution were observed in this mutant, indicating that this vital heterochromatin factor is dispensable for preventing crossovers in heterochromatin. Thus, in Drosophila. melanogaster the meiotic machinery seems to play a more significant role in suppressing centromere-proximal crossovers than chromatin state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nila M Pazhayam
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Sasha Sagar
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jeff Sekelsky
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yone H, Kawashima Y, Hirai H, Oda AH, Sato M, Kono H, Ohta K. Light-controlled Spo11-less meiotic DNA breaks by MagTAQing lead to chromosomal aberrations. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:gkaf206. [PMID: 40207630 PMCID: PMC11983132 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaf206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025] Open
Abstract
TAQing technologies are based on the restriction enzyme-induced DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation in living cells, which results in large-scale genomic rearrangements and phenotypic alterations. Originally, the TAQing system requires heat treatments to activate restriction enzymes, which sometimes leads to cell toxicity or stress responses. Here, we developed a blue-light-controlled MagTAQing system, which induces DSBs exclusively upon blue-light exposure by assembling the split restriction enzymes via Magnet modules. Application of MagTAQing to mitotic budding yeast cells successfully triggered various genomic rearrangements upon blue-light exposure. Since this technology enables the conditional induction of genomic rearrangements in specific cells or tissues, we employed MagTAQing on meiotic yeast cells lacking the recombinase Spo11 to induce artificial DSBs. Consequently, Spo11-independent meiotic DSBs resulted in aneuploidies and nonallelic homologous recombinations between repetitive sequences such as ribosomal DNA and retrotransposons. These results suggest a pivotal role of Spo11-induced recombination in preventing chromosomal abnormality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Yone
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Yuri Kawashima
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Hayato Hirai
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Arisa H Oda
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Moritoshi Sato
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
- Kanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (KISTEC), 3-2-1 Sakado, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 213-0012, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Kono
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Ohta
- Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
- Universal Biology Institute, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
- Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koch LB, Marston AL. The functional organisation of the centromere and kinetochore during meiosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2025; 94:102486. [PMID: 40015116 PMCID: PMC7617577 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2025.102486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
Meiosis generates gametes through a specialised cell cycle that reduces the genome by half. Homologous chromosomes are segregated in meiosis I and sister chromatids are segregated in meiosis II. Centromeres and kinetochores play central roles in instructing this specialised chromosome segregation pattern. Accordingly, kinetochores acquire meiosis-specific modifications. Here we contextualise recent highlights in our understanding of how centromeres and kinetochores direct the sorting of chromosomes into gametes via meiosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori B Koch
- Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, United Kingdom
| | - Adele L Marston
- Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiao C, Xie X, Hao C, Chen L, Xie Y, Garg V, Zhao L, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Li T, Fu J, Chitikineni A, Hou J, Liu H, Dwivedi G, Liu X, Jia J, Mao L, Wang X, Appels R, Varshney RK, Guo W, Zhang X. Pan-genome bridges wheat structural variations with habitat and breeding. Nature 2025; 637:384-393. [PMID: 39604736 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08277-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Wheat is the second largest food crop with a very good breeding system and pedigree record in China. Investigating the genomic footprints of wheat cultivars will unveil potential avenues for future breeding efforts1,2. Here we report chromosome-level genome assemblies of 17 wheat cultivars that chronicle the breeding history of China. Comparative genomic analysis uncovered a wealth of structural rearrangements, identifying 249,976 structural variations with 49.03% (122,567) longer than 5 kb. Cultivars developed in 1980s displayed significant accumulations of structural variations, a pattern linked to the extensive incorporation of European and American varieties into breeding programmes of that era. We further proved that structural variations in the centromere-proximal regions are associated with a reduction of crossover events. We showed that common wheat evolved from spring to winter types via mutations and duplications of the VRN-A1 gene as an adaptation strategy to a changing environment. We confirmed shifts in wheat cultivars linked to dietary preferences, migration and cultural integration in Northwest China. We identified large presence or absence variations of pSc200 tandem repeats on the 1RS terminal, suggesting its own rapid evolution in the wheat genome. The high-quality genome assemblies of 17 representatives developed and their good complementarity to the 10+ pan-genomes offer a robust platform for future genomics-assisted breeding in wheat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengzhi Jiao
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoming Xie
- Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Chenyang Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Liyang Chen
- Smartgenomics Technology Institute, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuxin Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Vanika Garg
- Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Li Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Wang
- Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuqi Zhang
- Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Tian Li
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Junjie Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Annapurna Chitikineni
- Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jian Hou
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hongxia Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Girish Dwivedi
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, the University of Western Australia, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Xu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jizeng Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Long Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiue Wang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Rudi Appels
- Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport, and Resources, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rajeev K Varshney
- Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Weilong Guo
- Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
| | - Xueyong Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pazhayam NM, Sagar S, Sekelsky J. Suppression of meiotic crossovers in pericentromeric heterochromatin requires synaptonemal complex and meiotic recombination factors in Drosophila melanogaster. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.12.19.629512. [PMID: 39763933 PMCID: PMC11702629 DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.19.629512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2025]
Abstract
The centromere effect (CE) is a meiotic phenomenon that ensures meiotic crossover suppression in pericentromeric regions. Despite being a critical safeguard against nondisjunction, the mechanisms behind the CE remain unknown. Previous studies have shown that various regions of the Drosophila pericentromere, encompassing proximal euchromatin, beta and alpha heterochromatin, undergo varying levels of crossover suppression, raising the question of whether distinct mechanisms establish the CE in these different regions. To address this question, we asked whether different pericentromeric regions respond differently to mutations that impair various features that may play a role in the CE. In flies with a mutation that affects the synaptonemal complex (SC), a structure is hypothesized to have important roles in recombination and crossover patterning, we observed a significant redistribution of pericentromeric crossovers from proximal euchromatin towards beta heterochromatin but not alpha heterochromatin, indicating a role for the SC in suppressing crossovers in beta heterochromatin. In flies mutant for mei-218 or rec, which encode components of a critical pro-crossover complex, there was a more extreme redistribution of pericentromeric crossovers towards both beta and alpha heterochromatin, suggesting an important role for these meiotic recombination factors in suppressing heterochromatic crossovers. Lastly, we mapped crossovers in flies mutant for Su(var)3-9. Although we expected a strong alleviation of crossover suppression in heterochromatic regions, no changes in pericentromeric crossover distribution were observed in this mutant, indicating that this vital heterochromatin factor is dispensable to prevent crossovers in heterochromatin. Our results indicate that the meiotic machinery plays a bigger role in suppressing crossovers than the chromatin state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nila M. Pazhayam
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Sasha Sagar
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Jeff Sekelsky
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang C, Chen Z, Copenhaver GP, Wang Y. Heterochromatin in plant meiosis. Nucleus 2024; 15:2328719. [PMID: 38488152 PMCID: PMC10950279 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2024.2328719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Heterochromatin is an organizational property of eukaryotic chromosomes, characterized by extensive DNA and histone modifications, that is associated with the silencing of transposable elements and repetitive sequences. Maintaining heterochromatin is crucial for ensuring genomic integrity and stability during the cell cycle. During meiosis, heterochromatin is important for homologous chromosome synapsis, recombination, and segregation, but our understanding of meiotic heterochromatin formation and condensation is limited. In this review, we focus on the dynamics and features of heterochromatin and how it condenses during meiosis in plants. We also discuss how meiotic heterochromatin influences the interaction and recombination of homologous chromosomes during prophase I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyu Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gregory P. Copenhaver
- Department of Biology and the Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yingxiang Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu Y, Zhou Y, Bian C, Li H, Kang Y, Gao Y, Peng Y, Zhang C. Structural Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Exopolysaccharide Produced from Beet Waste Residue by Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides. Antioxidants (Basel) 2024; 13:1289. [PMID: 39594431 PMCID: PMC11591082 DOI: 10.3390/antiox13111289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharide (EPS) is a large molecular polymer produced during the growth and metabolism of lactic acid bacteria. EPS has multiple biological functions and is widely used in fields such as food and medicine. However, the low yield and high production cost of EPS derived from lactic acid bacteria limit its widespread application. In this study, we used beet waste residue as a substrate to produce EPS by fermentation with Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides to improve the utilization rate of agricultural waste and reduce the production cost of lactic acid bacterial EPS. After purification, the molecular weight (Mw) of EPS was determined to be 417 kDa using high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy revealed that the EPS was composed of glucose subunits with α-1,6 glycosidic linkages. The thermal analysis and heavy metal adsorption capacity revealed a relatively high degradation temperature of 315.54 °C and that the material could effectively adsorb Cu2+. Additionally, the findings indicated that the EPS exhibited a significant ability to neutralize free radicals, a property that was found to be concentration dependent. Furthermore, the results of the intracellular study showed the protective effect of freshly isolated EPS on tBHP-induced cellular oxidative stress at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. These results suggest that the EPS from L. pseudomesenteroides may be developed as antioxidant agents for functional food products and pharmaceutical applications due to its capacity to scavenge free radicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| | - Cong Bian
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| | - Heqi Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| | - Youxian Kang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Clinical Trial, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China;
| | - Yao Peng
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| | - Chunjing Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China; (Y.L.); (Y.Z.); (C.B.); (H.L.); (Y.K.); (Y.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Naish M, Henderson IR. The structure, function, and evolution of plant centromeres. Genome Res 2024; 34:161-178. [PMID: 38485193 PMCID: PMC10984392 DOI: 10.1101/gr.278409.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Centromeres are essential regions of eukaryotic chromosomes responsible for the formation of kinetochore complexes, which connect to spindle microtubules during cell division. Notably, although centromeres maintain a conserved function in chromosome segregation, the underlying DNA sequences are diverse both within and between species and are predominantly repetitive in nature. The repeat content of centromeres includes high-copy tandem repeats (satellites), and/or specific families of transposons. The functional region of the centromere is defined by loading of a specific histone 3 variant (CENH3), which nucleates the kinetochore and shows dynamic regulation. In many plants, the centromeres are composed of satellite repeat arrays that are densely DNA methylated and invaded by centrophilic retrotransposons. In some cases, the retrotransposons become the sites of CENH3 loading. We review the structure of plant centromeres, including monocentric, holocentric, and metapolycentric architectures, which vary in the number and distribution of kinetochore attachment sites along chromosomes. We discuss how variation in CENH3 loading can drive genome elimination during early cell divisions of plant embryogenesis. We review how epigenetic state may influence centromere identity and discuss evolutionary models that seek to explain the paradoxically rapid change of centromere sequences observed across species, including the potential roles of recombination. We outline putative modes of selection that could act within the centromeres, as well as the role of repeats in driving cycles of centromere evolution. Although our primary focus is on plant genomes, we draw comparisons with animal and fungal centromeres to derive a eukaryote-wide perspective of centromere structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Naish
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom
| | - Ian R Henderson
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fernandes JB, Naish M, Lian Q, Burns R, Tock AJ, Rabanal FA, Wlodzimierz P, Habring A, Nicholas RE, Weigel D, Mercier R, Henderson IR. Structural variation and DNA methylation shape the centromere-proximal meiotic crossover landscape in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 2024; 25:30. [PMID: 38254210 PMCID: PMC10804481 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03163-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centromeres load kinetochore complexes onto chromosomes, which mediate spindle attachment and allow segregation during cell division. Although centromeres perform a conserved cellular function, their underlying DNA sequences are highly divergent within and between species. Despite variability in DNA sequence, centromeres are also universally suppressed for meiotic crossover recombination, across eukaryotes. However, the genetic and epigenetic factors responsible for suppression of centromeric crossovers remain to be completely defined. RESULTS To explore the centromere-proximal meiotic recombination landscape, we map 14,397 crossovers against fully assembled Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana) genomes. A. thaliana centromeres comprise megabase satellite repeat arrays that load nucleosomes containing the CENH3 histone variant. Each chromosome contains a structurally polymorphic region of ~3-4 megabases, which lack crossovers and include the satellite arrays. This polymorphic region is flanked by ~1-2 megabase low-recombination zones. These recombination-suppressed regions are enriched for Gypsy/Ty3 retrotransposons, and additionally contain expressed genes with high genetic diversity that initiate meiotic recombination, yet do not crossover. We map crossovers at high-resolution in proximity to CEN3, which resolves punctate centromere-proximal hotspots that overlap gene islands embedded in heterochromatin. Centromeres are densely DNA methylated and the recombination landscape is remodelled in DNA methylation mutants. We observe that the centromeric low-recombining zones decrease and increase crossovers in CG (met1) and non-CG (cmt3) mutants, respectively, whereas the core non-recombining zones remain suppressed. CONCLUSION Our work relates the genetic and epigenetic organization of A. thaliana centromeres and flanking pericentromeric heterochromatin to the zones of crossover suppression that surround the CENH3-occupied satellite repeat arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joiselle B Fernandes
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
- Department of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, D-50829, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthew Naish
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Qichao Lian
- Department of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, D-50829, Cologne, Germany
| | - Robin Burns
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Andrew J Tock
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Fernando A Rabanal
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Piotr Wlodzimierz
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Anette Habring
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert E Nicholas
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Detlef Weigel
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology, Tübingen, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Raphael Mercier
- Department of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, D-50829, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ian R Henderson
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chowdary KVSKA, Saini R, Singh AK. Epigenetic regulation during meiosis and crossover. PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PLANTS : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY 2023; 29:1945-1958. [PMID: 38222277 PMCID: PMC10784443 DOI: 10.1007/s12298-023-01390-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Meiosis is a distinctive type of cell division that reorganizes genetic material between generations. The initial stages of meiosis consist of several crucial steps which include double strand break, homologous chromosome pairing, break repair and crossover. Crossover frequency varies depending on the position on the chromosome, higher at euchromatin region and rare at heterochromatin, centromeres, telomeres and ribosomal DNA. Crossover positioning is dependent on various factors, especially epigenetic modifications. DNA methylation, histone post-translational modifications, histone variants and non-coding RNAs are most probably playing an important role in positioning of crossovers on a chromosomal level as well as hotspot level. DNA methylation negatively regulates crossover frequency and its effect is visible in centromeres, pericentromeres and heterochromatin regions. Pericentromeric chromatin and heterochromatin mark studies have been a centre of attraction in meiosis. Crossover hotspots are associated with euchromatin regions having specific chromatin modifications such as H3K4me3, H2A.Z. and H3 acetylation. This review will provide the current understanding of the epigenetic role in plants during meiotic recombination, chromosome synapsis, double strand break and hotspots with special attention to euchromatin and heterochromatin marks. Further, the role of epigenetic modifications in regulating meiosis and crossover in other organisms is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. V. S. K. Arjun Chowdary
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi, 110021 India
| | - Ramswaroop Saini
- Department of Biotechnology, Joy University, Vadakangulam, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu 627116 India
| | - Amit Kumar Singh
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi, 110021 India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Palacios-Blanco I, Martín-Castellanos C. Cyclins and CDKs in the regulation of meiosis-specific events. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:1069064. [PMID: 36523509 PMCID: PMC9745066 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1069064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
How eukaryotic cells control their duplication is a fascinating example of how a biological system self-organizes specific activities to temporally order cellular events. During cell cycle progression, the cellular level of CDK (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase) activity temporally orders the different cell cycle phases, ensuring that DNA replication occurs prior to segregation into two daughter cells. CDK activity requires the binding of a regulatory subunit (cyclin) to the core kinase, and both CDKs and cyclins are well conserved throughout evolution from yeast to humans. As key regulators, they coordinate cell cycle progression with metabolism, DNA damage, and cell differentiation. In meiosis, the special cell division that ensures the transmission of genetic information from one generation to the next, cyclins and CDKs have acquired novel functions to coordinate meiosis-specific events such as chromosome architecture, recombination, and synapsis. Interestingly, meiosis-specific cyclins and CDKs are common in evolution, some cyclins seem to have evolved to acquire CDK-independent functions, and even some CDKs associate with a non-cyclin partner. We will review the functions of these key regulators in meiosis where variation has specially flourished.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Segregation of chromosomes during meiosis, to form haploid gametes from diploid precursor cells, requires in most species formation of crossovers physically connecting homologous chromosomes. Along with sister chromatid cohesion, crossovers allow tension to be generated when chromosomes begin to segregate; tension signals that chromosome movement is proceeding properly. But crossovers too close to each other might result in less sister chromatid cohesion and tension and thus failed meiosis. Interference describes the non-random distribution of crossovers, which occur farther apart than expected from independence. We discuss both genetic and cytological methods of assaying crossover interference and models for interference, whose molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated. We note marked differences among species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerald R Smith
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McVey SL, Olson MA, Pawlowski WP, Nannas NJ. Beyond Editing, CRISPR/Cas9 For Protein Localization: An Educational Primer for Use with "A dCas9-Based System Identifies a Central Role for Ctf19 in Kinetochore-Derived Suppression of Meiotic Recombination". Genetics 2022; 222:6650694. [PMID: 35894926 PMCID: PMC9434236 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 has dramatically changed how we conduct genetic research, providing a tool for precise sequence editing. However, new applications of CRISPR/Cas9 have emerged that do not involve nuclease activity. In the accompanying article "A dCas9-Based System Identifies a Central Role for Ctf19 in Kinetochore-Derived Suppression of Meiotic Recombination", Kuhl and colleagues utilize a catalytically dead Cas9 to localize proteins at specific genomic locations. The authors seek to understand the role of kinetochore proteins in the suppression of meiotic recombination, a phenomenon that has been observed in centromere regions. By harnessing the power of CRISPR/Cas9 to bind specific genomic sequences, Kuhl et al. localized individual kinetochore proteins to areas of high meiotic recombination and assessed their role in suppression. This primer article provides undergraduate students with background information on chromosomes, meiosis, recombination and CRISPR/Cas9 to support their reading of the Kuhl et al. study. This primer is intended to help students and instructors navigate the study's experimental design, interpret the results, and appreciate the broader scope of meiotic recombination and CRISPR/Cas9. Questions are included to facilitate discussion of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby L McVey
- Department of Biology, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323, USA
| | - Mischa A Olson
- Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
| | - Wojciech P Pawlowski
- Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.,Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sen S, Dodamani A, Nambiar M. Emerging mechanisms and roles of meiotic crossover repression at centromeres. Curr Top Dev Biol 2022; 151:155-190. [PMID: 36681469 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Crossover events during recombination in meiosis are essential for generating genetic diversity as well as crucial to allow accurate chromosomal segregation between homologous chromosomes. Spatial control for the distribution of crossover events along the chromosomes is largely a tightly regulated process and involves many facets such as interference, repression as well as assurance, to make sure that not too many or too few crossovers are generated. Repression of crossover events at the centromeres is a highly conserved process across all species tested. Failure to inhibit such recombination events can result in chromosomal mis-segregation during meiosis resulting in aneuploid gametes that are responsible for infertility or developmental disorders such as Down's syndrome and other trisomies in humans. In the past few decades, studies to understand the molecular mechanisms behind this repression have shown the involvement of a multitude of factors ranging from the centromere-specific proteins such as the kinetochore to the flanking pericentric heterochromatin as well as DNA double-strand break repair pathways. In this chapter, we review the different mechanisms of pericentric repression mechanisms known till date as well as highlight the importance of understanding this regulation in the context of chromosomal segregation defects. We also discuss the clinical implications of dysregulation of this process, especially in human reproductive health and genetic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sucharita Sen
- Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India
| | - Ananya Dodamani
- Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India
| | - Mridula Nambiar
- Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morgan C, Nayak A, Hosoya N, Smith GR, Lambing C. Meiotic chromosome organization and its role in recombination and cancer. Curr Top Dev Biol 2022; 151:91-126. [PMID: 36681479 PMCID: PMC10022578 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Chromosomes adopt specific conformations to regulate various cellular processes. A well-documented chromosome configuration is the highly compacted chromosome structure during metaphase. More regional chromatin conformations have also been reported, including topologically associated domains encompassing mega-bases of DNA and local chromatin loops formed by kilo-bases of DNA. In this review, we discuss the changes in chromatin conformation taking place between somatic and meiotic cells, with a special focus on the establishment of a proteinaceous structure, called the chromosome axis, at the beginning of meiosis. The chromosome axis is essential to support key meiotic processes such as chromosome pairing, homologous recombination, and balanced chromosome segregation to transition from a diploid to a haploid stage. We review the role of the chromosome axis in meiotic chromatin organization and provide a detailed description of its protein composition. We also review the conserved and distinct roles between species of axis proteins in meiotic recombination, which is a major factor contributing to the creation of genetic diversity and genome evolution. Finally, we discuss situations where the chromosome axis is deregulated and evaluate the effects on genome integrity and the consequences from protein deregulation in meiocytes exposed to heat stress, and aberrant expression of genes encoding axis proteins in mammalian somatic cells associated with certain types of cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aditya Nayak
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Noriko Hosoya
- Laboratory of Molecular Radiology, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gerald R Smith
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Christophe Lambing
- Plant Science Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xie C, Wang W, Tu C, Meng L, Lu G, Lin G, Lu LY, Tan YQ. OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28:763-797. [PMID: 35613017 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Xie
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Weili Wang
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chaofeng Tu
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Lanlan Meng
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Guangxiu Lu
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Ge Lin
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Lin-Yu Lu
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yue-Qiu Tan
- Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Hanson SJ, Cinnéide EÓ, Salzberg LI, Wolfe KH, McGowan J, Fitzpatrick DA, Matlin K. Genomic diversity, chromosomal rearrangements, and interspecies hybridization in the Ogataea polymorpha species complex. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2021; 11:jkab211. [PMID: 34849824 PMCID: PMC8496258 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The methylotrophic yeast Ogataea polymorpha has long been a useful system for recombinant protein production, as well as a model system for methanol metabolism, peroxisome biogenesis, thermotolerance, and nitrate assimilation. It has more recently become an important model for the evolution of mating-type switching. Here, we present a population genomics analysis of 47 isolates within the O. polymorpha species complex, including representatives of the species O. polymorpha, Ogataea parapolymorpha, Ogataea haglerorum, and Ogataea angusta. We found low levels of nucleotide sequence diversity within the O. polymorpha species complex and identified chromosomal rearrangements both within and between species. In addition, we found that one isolate is an interspecies hybrid between O. polymorpha and O. parapolymorpha and present evidence for loss of heterozygosity following hybridization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J Hanson
- Department of Molecular Biology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA
| | - Eoin Ó Cinnéide
- School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Letal I Salzberg
- School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Kenneth H Wolfe
- School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Jamie McGowan
- Genome Evolution Laboratory, Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
- Kathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - David A Fitzpatrick
- Genome Evolution Laboratory, Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
- Kathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Kate Matlin
- Department of Molecular Biology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grey C, de Massy B. Chromosome Organization in Early Meiotic Prophase. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:688878. [PMID: 34150782 PMCID: PMC8209517 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.688878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the most fascinating aspects of meiosis is the extensive reorganization of the genome at the prophase of the first meiotic division (prophase I). The first steps of this reorganization are observed with the establishment of an axis structure, that connects sister chromatids, from which emanate arrays of chromatin loops. This axis structure, called the axial element, consists of various proteins, such as cohesins, HORMA-domain proteins, and axial element proteins. In many organisms, axial elements are required to set the stage for efficient sister chromatid cohesion and meiotic recombination, necessary for the recognition of the homologous chromosomes. Here, we review the different actors involved in axial element formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in mouse. We describe the current knowledge of their localization pattern during prophase I, their functional interdependence, their role in sister chromatid cohesion, loop axis formation, homolog pairing before meiotic recombination, and recombination. We also address further challenges that need to be resolved, to fully understand the interplay between the chromosome structure and the different molecular steps that take place in early prophase I, which lead to the successful outcome of meiosis I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne Grey
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Bernard de Massy
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fission Yeast Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Ensures Mitotic and Meiotic Chromosome Segregation Fidelity. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22020639. [PMID: 33440639 PMCID: PMC7827777 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme in the folate metabolic pathway, and its loss of function through polymorphisms is often associated with human conditions, including cancer, congenital heart disease, and Down syndrome. MTHFR is also required in the maintenance of heterochromatin, a crucial determinant of genomic stability and precise chromosomal segregation. Here, we characterize the function of a fission yeast gene met11+, which encodes a protein that is highly homologous to the mammalian MTHFR. We show that, although met11+ is not essential for viability, its disruption increases chromosome missegregation and destabilizes constitutive heterochromatic regions at pericentromeric, sub-telomeric and ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci. Transcriptional silencing at these sites were disrupted, which is accompanied by the reduction in enrichment of histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) and binding of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1)-like Swi6. The met11 null mutant also dominantly disrupts meiotic fidelity, as displayed by reduced sporulation efficiency and defects in proper partitioning of the genetic material during meiosis. Interestingly, the faithful execution of these meiotic processes is synergistically ensured by cooperation among Met11, Rec8, a meiosis-specific cohesin protein, and the shugoshin protein Sgo1, which protects Rec8 from untimely cleavage. Overall, our results suggest a key role for Met11 in maintaining pericentromeric heterochromatin for precise genetic inheritance during mitosis and meiosis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Kasinathan B, Colmenares SU, McConnell H, Young JM, Karpen GH, Malik HS. Innovation of heterochromatin functions drives rapid evolution of essential ZAD-ZNF genes in Drosophila. eLife 2020; 9:e63368. [PMID: 33169670 PMCID: PMC7655104 DOI: 10.7554/elife.63368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Contrary to dogma, evolutionarily young and dynamic genes can encode essential functions. We find that evolutionarily dynamic ZAD-ZNF genes, which encode the most abundant class of insect transcription factors, are more likely to encode essential functions in Drosophila melanogaster than ancient, conserved ZAD-ZNF genes. We focus on the Nicknack ZAD-ZNF gene, which is evolutionarily young, poorly retained in Drosophila species, and evolves under strong positive selection. Yet we find that it is necessary for larval development in D. melanogaster. We show that Nicknack encodes a heterochromatin-localizing protein like its paralog Oddjob, also an evolutionarily dynamic yet essential ZAD-ZNF gene. We find that the divergent D. simulans Nicknack protein can still localize to D. melanogaster heterochromatin and rescue viability of female but not male Nicknack-null D. melanogaster. Our findings suggest that innovation for rapidly changing heterochromatin functions might generally explain the essentiality of many evolutionarily dynamic ZAD-ZNF genes in insects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavatharini Kasinathan
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington School of MedicineSeattleUnited States
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate program, University of Washington School of MedicineSeattleUnited States
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Serafin U Colmenares
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUnited States
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- Innovative Genomics InstituteBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Hannah McConnell
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Janet M Young
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
| | - Gary H Karpen
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUnited States
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- Innovative Genomics InstituteBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Harmit S Malik
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kuhl LM, Makrantoni V, Recknagel S, Vaze AN, Marston AL, Vader G. A dCas9-Based System Identifies a Central Role for Ctf19 in Kinetochore-Derived Suppression of Meiotic Recombination. Genetics 2020; 216:395-408. [PMID: 32843356 PMCID: PMC7536843 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In meiosis, crossover (CO) formation between homologous chromosomes is essential for faithful segregation. However, misplaced meiotic recombination can have catastrophic consequences on genome stability. Within pericentromeres, COs are associated with meiotic chromosome missegregation. In organisms ranging from yeast to humans, pericentromeric COs are repressed. We previously identified a role for the kinetochore-associated Ctf19 complex (Ctf19c) in pericentromeric CO suppression. Here, we develop a dCas9/CRISPR-based system that allows ectopic targeting of Ctf19c-subunits. Using this approach, we query sufficiency in meiotic CO suppression, and identify Ctf19 as a mediator of kinetochore-associated CO control. The effect of Ctf19 is encoded in its NH2-terminal tail, and depends on residues important for the recruitment of the Scc2-Scc4 cohesin regulator. This work provides insight into kinetochore-derived control of meiotic recombination. We establish an experimental platform to investigate and manipulate meiotic CO control. This platform can easily be adapted in order to investigate other aspects of chromosome biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa-Marie Kuhl
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund 44227, Germany
| | - Vasso Makrantoni
- The Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Recknagel
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund 44227, Germany
| | - Animish N Vaze
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund 44227, Germany
| | - Adele L Marston
- The Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, United Kingdom
| | - Gerben Vader
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund 44227, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) in Chemical and Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund 44227, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kelleher ES, Barbash DA, Blumenstiel JP. Taming the Turmoil Within: New Insights on the Containment of Transposable Elements. Trends Genet 2020; 36:474-489. [PMID: 32473745 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genetic parasites that can exponentially increase their genomic abundance through self-propagation. Classic theoretical papers highlighted the importance of two potentially escalating forces that oppose TE spread: regulated transposition and purifying selection. Here, we review new insights into mechanisms of TE regulation and purifying selection, which reveal the remarkable foresight of these theoretical models. We further highlight emergent connections between transcriptional control enacted by small RNAs and the contribution of TE insertions to structural mutation and host-gene regulation. Finally, we call for increased comparative analysis of TE dynamics and fitness effects, as well as host control mechanisms, to reveal how interconnected forces shape the differential prevalence and distribution of TEs across the tree of life.
Collapse
|
24
|
Smith GR, Nambiar M. New Solutions to Old Problems: Molecular Mechanisms of Meiotic Crossover Control. Trends Genet 2020; 36:337-346. [PMID: 32294414 PMCID: PMC7162993 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
During scientific investigations, the explanation of remarkably interesting phenomena must often await development of new methods or accrual of new observations that in retrospect can lead to lucid answers to the initial problem. A case in point is the control of genetic recombination during meiosis, which leads to crossovers between chromosomes critical for production of healthy offspring. Crossovers must be properly placed along meiotic chromosomes for their accurate segregation. Here, we review observations on two aspects of meiotic crossover control - crossover interference and repression of crossovers near centromeres, both observed more than 85 years ago. Only recently have relatively simple molecular mechanisms for these phenomena become clear through advances in both methods and understanding the molecular basis of meiotic recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald R Smith
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Mridula Nambiar
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Talbert PB, Henikoff S. What makes a centromere? Exp Cell Res 2020; 389:111895. [PMID: 32035948 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Centromeres are the eukaryotic chromosomal sites at which the kinetochore forms and attaches to spindle microtubules to orchestrate chromosomal segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Although centromeres are essential for cell division, their sequences are not conserved and evolve rapidly. Centromeres vary dramatically in size and organization. Here we categorize their diversity and explore the evolutionary forces shaping them. Nearly all centromeres favor AT-rich DNA that is gene-free and transcribed at a very low level. Repair of frequent centromere-proximal breaks probably contributes to their rapid sequence evolution. Point centromeres are only ~125 bp and are specified by common protein-binding motifs, whereas short regional centromeres are 1-5 kb, typically have unique sequences, and may have pericentromeric repeats adapted to facilitate centromere clustering. Transposon-rich centromeres are often ~100-300 kb and are favored by RNAi machinery that silences transposons, by suppression of meiotic crossovers at centromeres, and by the ability of some transposons to target centromeres. Megabase-length satellite centromeres arise in plants and animals with asymmetric female meiosis that creates centromere competition, and favors satellite monomers one or two nucleosomes in length that position and stabilize centromeric nucleosomes. Holocentromeres encompass the length of a chromosome and may differ dramatically between mitosis and meiosis. We propose a model in which low level transcription of centromeres facilitates the formation of non-B DNA that specifies centromeres and promotes loading of centromeric nucleosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Talbert
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Steven Henikoff
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lawrimore CJ, Bloom K. Common Features of the Pericentromere and Nucleolus. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:E1029. [PMID: 31835574 PMCID: PMC6947172 DOI: 10.3390/genes10121029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Both the pericentromere and the nucleolus have unique characteristics that distinguish them amongst the rest of genome. Looping of pericentromeric DNA, due to structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins condensin and cohesin, drives its ability to maintain tension during metaphase. Similar loops are formed via condensin and cohesin in nucleolar ribosomal DNA (rDNA). Condensin and cohesin are also concentrated in transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, genes which may be located within the pericentromere as well as tethered to the nucleolus. Replication fork stalling, as well as downstream consequences such as genomic recombination, are characteristic of both the pericentromere and rDNA. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that the pericentromere may function as a liquid-liquid phase separated domain, similar to the nucleolus. We therefore propose that the pericentromere and nucleolus, in part due to their enrichment of SMC proteins and others, contain similar domains that drive important cellular activities such as segregation, stability, and repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kerry Bloom
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Braun-Galleani S, Dias JA, Coughlan AY, Ryan AP, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. Genomic diversity and meiotic recombination among isolates of the biotech yeast Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris). Microb Cell Fact 2019; 18:211. [PMID: 31801527 PMCID: PMC6894112 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-019-1260-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Komagataella phaffii is a yeast widely used in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and is one of the two species that were previously called Pichia pastoris. However, almost all laboratory work on K. phaffii has utilized strains derived from a single natural isolate, CBS7435. There is little information about the sequence diversity of K. phaffii or the genetic properties of this species. RESULTS We sequenced the genomes of all the known isolates of K. phaffii. We made a genetic cross between derivatives of two isolates that differ at 44,000 single nucleotide polymorphism sites, and used this cross to analyze the rate and landscape of meiotic recombination. We conducted tetrad analysis by making use of the property that K. phaffii haploids do not mate in rich media, which enabled us to isolate and sequence the four types of haploid cell that are present in the colony that forms when a tetra-type ascus germinates. CONCLUSIONS We found that only four distinct natural isolates of K. phaffii exist in public yeast culture collections. The meiotic recombination rate in K. phaffii is approximately 3.5 times lower than in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with an average of 25 crossovers per meiosis. Recombination is suppressed, and genetic diversity among natural isolates is low, in a region around centromeres that is much larger than the centromeres themselves. Our work lays a foundation for future quantitative trait locus analysis in K. phaffii.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie A Dias
- UCD Conway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Aisling Y Coughlan
- UCD Conway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adam P Ryan
- UCD Conway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kevin P Byrne
- UCD Conway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kenneth H Wolfe
- UCD Conway Institute, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
During meiosis, homologous chromosomes of a diploid cell are replicated and, without a second replication, are segregated during two nuclear divisions to produce four haploid cells (including discarded polar bodies in females of many species). Proper segregation of chromosomes at the first division requires in most species that homologous chromosomes be physically connected. Tension generated by connected chromosomes moving to opposite sides of the cell signals proper segregation. In the absence of the required connections, called crossovers, chromosomes often segregate randomly and produce aneuploid gametes and, thus, dead or disabled progeny. To be effective, crossovers must be properly distributed along chromosomes. Crossovers within or too near the centromere interfere with proper segregation; crossovers too near each other can ablate the required tension; and crossovers too concentrated in only one or a few regions would not re-assort most genetic characters important for evolution. Here, we discuss current knowledge of how the optimal distribution of crossovers is achieved in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, with reference to other well-studied species for comparison and illustration of the diversity of biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mridula Nambiar
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98112, United States
| | - Yu-Chien Chuang
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98112, United States
| | - Gerald R Smith
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98112, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Heterogeneous transposable elements as silencers, enhancers and targets of meiotic recombination. Chromosoma 2019; 128:279-296. [PMID: 31332531 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-019-00718-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
During meiosis, DNA double-strand breaks are initiated by the topoisomerase-like enzyme SPO11 and are repaired by inter-sister chromatid and inter-homologue DNA repair pathways. Genome-wide maps of initiating DNA double-strand breaks and inter-homologue repair events are now available for a number of mammalian, fungal and plant species. In mammals, PRDM9 specifies the location of meiotic recombination initiation via recognition of specific DNA sequence motifs by its C2H2 zinc finger array. In fungi and plants, meiotic recombination appears to be initiated less discriminately in accessible chromatin, including at gene promoters. Generally, meiotic crossover is suppressed in highly repetitive genomic regions that are made up of transposable elements (TEs), to prevent deleterious non-allelic homologous recombination events. However, recent and older studies have revealed intriguing relationships between meiotic recombination initiation and repair, and transposable elements. For instance, gene conversion events have been detected in maize centromeric retroelements, mouse MULE-MuDR DNA transposons undergo substantial meiotic recombination initiation, Arabidopsis Helitron TEs are among the hottest of recombination initiation hotspots, and human TE sequences can modify the crossover rate at adjacent PRDM9 motifs in cis. Here, we summarize the relationship between meiotic recombination and TEs, discuss recent insights from highly divergent eukaryotes and highlight outstanding questions in the field.
Collapse
|
30
|
Riera-Escamilla A, Enguita-Marruedo A, Moreno-Mendoza D, Chianese C, Sleddens-Linkels E, Contini E, Benelli M, Natali A, Colpi GM, Ruiz-Castañé E, Maggi M, Baarends WM, Krausz C. Sequencing of a ‘mouse azoospermia’ gene panel in azoospermic men: identification of RNF212 and STAG3 mutations as novel genetic causes of meiotic arrest. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:978-988. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
What is the diagnostic potential of next generation sequencing (NGS) based on a ‘mouse azoospermia’ gene panel in human non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
The diagnostic performance of sequencing a gene panel based on genes associated with mouse azoospermia was relatively successful in idiopathic NOA patients and allowed the discovery of two novel genes involved in NOA due to meiotic arrest.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
NOA is a largely heterogeneous clinical entity, which includes different histological pictures. In a large proportion of NOA, the aetiology remains unknown (idiopathic NOA) and yet, unknown genetic factors are likely to play be involved. The mouse is the most broadly used mammalian model for studying human disease because of its usefulness for genetic manipulation and its genetic and physiological similarities to man. Mouse azoospermia models are available in the Mouse Genome Informatics database (MGI: http://www.informatics.jax.org/).
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
The first step was to design of a ‘mouse azoospermia’ gene panel through the consultation of MGI. The second step was NGS analysis of 175 genes in a group of highly selected NOA patients (n = 33). The third step was characterization of the discovered gene defects in human testis tissue, through meiotic studies using surplus testicular biopsy material from the carriers of the RNF212 and STAG3 pathogenic variants. The final step was RNF212 and STAG3 expression analysis in a collection of testis biopsies.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
From a total of 1300 infertile patients, 33 idiopathic NOA patients were analysed in this study, including 31 unrelated men and 2 brothers from a consanguineous family. The testis histology of the 31 unrelated NOA patients was as follows: 20 Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS), 11 spermatogenic arrest (6 spermatogonial arrest and 5 spermatocytic arrest). The two brothers were affected by spermatocytic arrest. DNA extracted from blood was used for NGS on Illumina NextSeq500 platform. Generated sequence data was filtered for rare and potentially pathogenic variants. Functional studies in surplus testicular tissue from the carriers included the investigation of meiotic entry, XY body formation and metaphases by performing fluorescent immunohistochemical staining and immunocytochemistry. mRNA expression analysis through RT-qPCR of RNF212 and STAG3 was carried out in a collection of testis biopsies with different histology.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Our approach was relatively successful, leading to the genetic diagnosis of one sporadic NOA patient and two NOA brothers. This relatively high diagnostic performance is likely to be related to the stringent patient selection criteria i.e. all known causes of azoospermia were excluded and to the relatively high number of patients with rare testis histology (spermatocytic arrest). All three mutation carriers presented meiotic arrest, leading to the genetic diagnosis of three out of seven cases with this specific testicular phenotype. For the first time, we report biallelic variants in STAG3, in one sporadic patient, and a homozygous RNF212 variant, in the two brothers, as the genetic cause of NOA. Meiotic studies allowed the detection of the functional consequences of the mutations and provided information on the role of STAG3 and RNF212 in human male meiosis.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
All genes, with the exception of 5 out of 175, included in the panel cause azoospermia in mice only in the homozygous or hemizygous state. Consequently, apart from the five known dominant genes, heterozygous variants (except compound heterozygosity) in the remaining genes were not taken into consideration as causes of NOA. We identified the genetic cause in approximately half of the patients with spermatocytic arrest. The low number of analysed patients can be considered as a limitation, but it is a very rare testis phenotype. Due to the low frequency of this specific phenotype among infertile men, our finding may be considered of low clinical impact. However, at an individual level, it does have relevance for prognostic purposes prior testicular sperm extraction.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Our study represents an additional step towards elucidating the genetic bases of early spermatogenic failure, since we discovered two new genes involved in human male meiotic arrest. We propose the inclusion of RNF212 and STAG3 in a future male infertility diagnostic gene panel. Based on the associated testis phenotype, the identification of pathogenic mutations in these genes also confers a negative predictive value for testicular sperm retrieval. Our meiotic studies provide novel insights into the role of these proteins in human male meiosis. Mutations in STAG3 were first described as a cause of female infertility and ovarian cancer, and Rnf212 knock out in mice leads to male and female infertility. Hence, our results stimulate further research on shared genetic factors causing infertility in both sexes and indicate that genetic counselling should involve not only male but also female relatives of NOA patients.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Health Instituto Carlos III-FIS (grant number: FIS/FEDER-PI14/01250; PI17/01822) awarded to CK and AR-E, and by the European Commission, Reproductive Biology Early Research Training (REPROTRAIN, EU-FP7-PEOPLE-2011-ITN289880), awarded to CK, WB, and AE-M. The authors have no conflict of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Riera-Escamilla
- Andrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - A Enguita-Marruedo
- Department of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Moreno-Mendoza
- Andrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - C Chianese
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, Centre of Excellence DeNothe, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - E Sleddens-Linkels
- Department of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Contini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Center of Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative neoplasms (CRIMM), AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Benelli
- Bioinformatics Unit, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - A Natali
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - G M Colpi
- Department of Andrology and IVF, San Carlo Clinic, Paderno-Dugnano/Milano, Italy
| | - E Ruiz-Castañé
- Andrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - M Maggi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, Centre of Excellence DeNothe, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - W M Baarends
- Department of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Krausz
- Andrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, Centre of Excellence DeNothe, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fernandes JB, Wlodzimierz P, Henderson IR. Meiotic recombination within plant centromeres. CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY 2019; 48:26-35. [PMID: 30954771 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Meiosis is a conserved eukaryotic cell division that increases genetic diversity in sexual populations. During meiosis homologous chromosomes pair and undergo recombination that can result in reciprocal genetic exchange, termed crossover. The frequency of crossover is highly variable along chromosomes, with hot spots and cold spots. For example, the centromeres that contain the kinetochore, which attach chromosomes to the microtubular spindle, are crossover cold spots. Plant centromeres typically consist of large tandemly repeated arrays of satellite sequences and retrotransposons, a subset of which assemble CENH3-variant nucleosomes, which bind to kinetochore proteins. Although crossovers are suppressed in centromeres, there is abundant evidence for gene conversion and homologous recombination between repeats, which plays a role in satellite array change. We review the evidence for recombination within plant centromeres and the implications for satellite sequence evolution. We speculate on the genetic and epigenetic features of centromeres that may influence meiotic recombination in these regions. We also highlight unresolved questions relating to centromere function and sequence change and how the advent of new technologies promises to provide insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joiselle B Fernandes
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Piotr Wlodzimierz
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ian R Henderson
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
McKay MJ, Craig J, Kalitsis P, Kozlov S, Verschoor S, Chen P, Lobachevsky P, Vasireddy R, Yan Y, Ryan J, McGillivray G, Savarirayan R, Lavin MF, Ramsay RG, Xu H. A Roberts Syndrome Individual With Differential Genotoxin Sensitivity and a DNA Damage Response Defect. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:1194-1202. [PMID: 30508616 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Roberts syndrome (RBS) is a rare, recessively transmitted developmental disorder characterized by growth retardation, craniofacial abnormalities, and truncation of limbs. All affected individuals to date have mutations in the ESCO2 (establishment of cohesion 2) gene, a key regulator of the cohesin complex, which is involved in sister chromatid cohesion and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Here we characterize DNA damage responses (DDRs) for the first time in an RBS-affected family. METHODS AND MATERIALS Lymphoblastoid cell lines were established from an RBS family, including the proband and parents carrying ESCO2 mutations. Various DDR assays were performed on these cells, including cell survival, chromosome break, and apoptosis assays; checkpoint activation indicators; and measures of DNA breakage and repair. RESULTS Cells derived from the RBS-affected individual showed sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) and mitomycin C-induced DNA damage. In this ESCO2 compound heterozygote, other DDRs were also defective, including enhanced IR-induced clastogenicity and apoptosis; increased DNA DSB induction; and a reduced capacity for repairing IR-induced DNA DSBs, as measured by γ-H2AX foci and the comet assay. CONCLUSIONS In addition to its developmental features, RBS can be, like ataxia telangiectasia, considered a DDR-defective syndrome, which contributes to its cellular, molecular, and clinical phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J McKay
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Latrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffery Craig
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Campus, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Kalitsis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sergei Kozlov
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sandra Verschoor
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phillip Chen
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Pavel Lobachevsky
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Raja Vasireddy
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yuqian Yan
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacinta Ryan
- School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - George McGillivray
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ravi Savarirayan
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin F Lavin
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert G Ramsay
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Huiling Xu
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; College of Life Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, Shanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kuhl L, Vader G. Kinetochores, cohesin, and DNA breaks: Controlling meiotic recombination within pericentromeres. Yeast 2019; 36:121-127. [PMID: 30625250 PMCID: PMC6519163 DOI: 10.1002/yea.3366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In meiosis, DNA break formation and repair are essential for the formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes. Without crossover formation, faithful meiotic chromosome segregation and sexual reproduction cannot occur. Crossover formation is initiated by the programmed, meiosis-specific introduction of numerous DNA double-strand breaks, after which specific repair pathways promote recombination between homologous chromosomes. Despite its crucial nature, meiotic recombination is fraud with danger: When positioned or repaired inappropriately, DNA breaks can have catastrophic consequences on genome stability of the resulting gametes. As such, DNA break formation and repair needs to be carefully controlled. Within centromeres and surrounding regions (i.e., pericentromeres), meiotic crossover recombination is repressed in organisms ranging from yeast to humans, and a failure to do so is implicated in chromosome missegregation and developmental aneuploidy. (Peri)centromere sequence identity and organization diverge considerably across eukaryotes, yet suppression of meiotic DNA break formation and repair appear universal. Here, we discuss emerging work that has used budding and fission yeast systems to study the mechanisms underlying pericentromeric suppression of DNA break formation and repair. We particularly highlight a role for the kinetochore, a universally conserved, centromere-associated structure essential for chromosome segregation, in suppressing (peri)centromeric DNA break formation and repair. We discuss the current understanding of kinetochore-associated and chromosomal factors involved in this regulation and suggest future avenues of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa‐Marie Kuhl
- Department of Mechanistic Cell BiologyMax Planck Institute of Molecular PhysiologyDortmundGermany
| | - Gerben Vader
- Department of Mechanistic Cell BiologyMax Planck Institute of Molecular PhysiologyDortmundGermany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Thon G, Maki T, Haber JE, Iwasaki H. Mating-type switching by homology-directed recombinational repair: a matter of choice. Curr Genet 2018; 65:351-362. [PMID: 30382337 PMCID: PMC6420890 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0900-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, all DNA transactions happen in the context of chromatin that often takes part in regulatory mechanisms. In particular, chromatin structure can regulate exchanges of DNA occurring through homologous recombination. Few systems have provided as detailed a view on this phenomenon as mating-type switching in yeast. Mating-type switching entails the choice of a template for the gene conversions of the expressed mating-type locus. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, correct template choice requires two competing small recombination enhancers, SRE2 and SRE3, that function in the context of heterochromatin. These two enhancers act with the Swi2/Swi5 recombination accessory complex to initiate strand exchange in a cell-type-specific manner, from SRE2 in M cells and SRE3 in P cells. New research indicates that the Set1C complex, responsible for H3K4 methylation, and the Brl2 ubiquitin ligase, that catalyzes H2BK119 ubiquitylation, participate in the cell-type-specific selection of SRE2 or SRE3. Here, we review these findings, compare donor preference in S. pombe to the distantly related budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and contrast the positive effects of heterochromatin on the donor selection process with other situations, where heterochromatin represses recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geneviève Thon
- Department of Biology, BioCenter, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Takahisa Maki
- Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James E Haber
- Department of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Hiroshi Iwasaki
- Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Life Science and Technology, School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|