A Reverse Transcriptase-Cas1 Fusion Protein Contains a Cas6 Domain Required for Both CRISPR RNA Biogenesis and RNA Spacer Acquisition

Mechanisms used for cDNA synthesis and site-specific integration of RNA into DNA genomes by a reverse transcriptase-Cas1 fusion protein

Reverse transcriptase-Cas1 (RT-Cas1) fusion proteins found in some CRISPR systems enable spacer acquisition from both RNA and DNA, but the mechanism of RNA spacer acquisition has remained unclear. Here, we found that Marinomonas mediterranea RT-Cas1/Cas2 adds short 3'-DNA (dN) tails to RNA protospacers, enabling their direct integration into CRISPR arrays as 3'-dN-RNAs or 3'-dN-RNA/cDNA duplexes at rates comparable to similarly configured DNAs. Reverse transcription of RNA protospacers is initiated at 3' proximal sites by multiple mechanisms, including recently described de novo initiation, protein priming with any dNTP, and use of short exogenous or synthesized DNA oligomer primers, enabling synthesis of near full-length cDNAs of diverse RNAs without fixed sequence requirements. The integration of 3'-dN-RNAs or single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) is favored over duplexes at higher protospacer concentrations, potentially relevant to spacer acquisition from abundant pathogen RNAs or ssDNA fragments generated by phage defense nucleases. Our findings reveal mechanisms for site-specifically integrating RNA into DNA genomes with potential biotechnological applications.

Harnessing CRISPR-Cas adaptation for RNA recording and beyond

Prokaryotes encode clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) arrays and CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes as an adaptive immune machinery. CRISPR-Cas systems effectively protect hosts from the invasion of foreign enemies, such as bacteriophages and plasmids. During a process called 'adaptation', non-self-nucleic acid fragments are acquired as spacers between repeats in the host CRISPR array, to establish immunological memory. The highly conserved Cas1-Cas2 complexes function as molecular recorders to integrate spacers in a time course manner, which can subsequently be expressed as crRNAs complexed with Cas effector proteins for the RNAguided interference pathways. In some of the RNA-targeting type III systems, Cas1 proteins are fused with reverse transcriptase (RT), indicating that RT-Cas1-Cas2 complexes can acquire RNA transcripts for spacer acquisition. In this review, we summarize current studies that focus on the molecular structure and function of the RT-fused Cas1-Cas2 integrase, and its potential applications as a directional RNA-recording tool in cells. Furthermore, we highlight outstanding questions for RT-Cas1-Cas2 studies and future directions for RNA-recording CRISPR technologies. [BMB Reports 2024; 57(1): 40-49].

In-silico whole-genome sequence analysis of a halotolerant filamentous mangrove cyanobacterium revealed CRISPR-Cas systems with unique properties

Novel CRISPR systems capable of cleaving both DNA and RNA are progressively emerging as attractive tools for genome manipulation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. We report specific characteristics of CRISPR systems present in Oxynema aestuarii AP17, a halotolerant, filamentous cyanobacterium and the second known member of the Oxynema genus. In-silico analyses of its whole-genome sequence revealed the presence of multiple Type I and Type III CRISPR loci with one Type I-G system previously unreported in cyanobacteria. We further identified the leader sequences at the 5' end of multiple CRISPR loci, many of which were distinct from previously reported cyanobacterial CRISPR leaders. Phylogenetic analyses of the O. aestuarii AP17 Cas1 proteins revealed two protein sequences that were unique and distantly related to other cyanobacterial Cas1 protein sequences. Our findings are significant because novel Class 1 CRISPR systems possess multi-subunit effectors and are highly flexible for repurposing by protein domain fusions made to the effector complex. Additionally, Type III CRISPRs are particularly useful for genome editing in certain extremophiles for which mesophilic Type II CRISPRs are ineffective.

To Be Mobile or Not: The Variety of Reverse Transcriptases and Their Recruitment by Host Genomes

Reverse transcriptases (RT), or RNA-dependent DNA polymerases, are unorthodox enzymes that originally added a new angle to the conventional view of the unidirectional flow of genetic information in the cell from DNA to RNA to protein. First discovered in vertebrate retroviruses, RTs were since re-discovered in most eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea, spanning essentially all domains of life. For retroviruses, RTs provide the ability to copy the RNA genome into DNA for subsequent incorporation into the host genome, which is essential for their replication and survival. In cellular organisms, most RT sequences originate from retrotransposons, the type of self-replicating genetic elements that rely on reverse transcription to copy and paste their sequences into new genomic locations. Some retroelements, however, can undergo domestication, eventually becoming a valuable addition to the overall repertoire of cellular enzymes. They can be beneficial yet accessory, like the diversity-generating elements, or even essential, like the telomerase reverse transcriptases. Nowadays, ever-increasing numbers of domesticated RT-carrying genetic elements are being discovered. It may be argued that domesticated RTs and reverse transcription in general is more widespread in cellular organisms than previously thought, and that many important cellular functions, such as chromosome end maintenance, may evolve from an originally selfish process of converting RNA into DNA.

Mechanisms used for cDNA synthesis and site-specific integration of RNA into DNA genomes by a reverse transcriptase-Cas1 fusion protein

Reverse transcriptase-Cas1 (RT-Cas1) fusion proteins found in some CRISPR systems enable spacer acquisition from both RNA and DNA, but the mechanism of RNA spacer acquisition has remained unclear. Here, we found Marinomonas mediterranea RT-Cas1/Cas2 adds short 3'-DNA (dN) tails to RNA protospacers enabling their direct integration into CRISPR arrays as 3'-dN-RNA/cDNA duplexes or 3'-dN-RNAs at rates comparable to similarly configured DNAs. Reverse transcription of RNA protospacers occurs by multiple mechanisms, including recently described de novo initiation, protein priming with any dNTP, and use of short exogenous or synthesized DNA oligomer primers, enabling synthesis of cDNAs from diverse RNAs without fixed sequence requirements. The integration of 3'-dN-RNAs or single-stranded (ss) DNAs is favored over duplexes at higher protospacer concentrations, potentially relevant to spacer acquisition from abundant pathogen RNAs or ssDNA fragments generated by phage-defense nucleases. Our findings reveal novel mechanisms for site-specifically integrating RNA into DNA genomes with potential biotechnological applications.

A New EBS2b-IBS2b Base Paring (A-8/T-8) Improved the Gene-Targeting Efficiency of Thermotargetron in Escherichia coli

Thermophilic group II intron is one type of retrotransposon composed of intron RNA and intron-encoded protein (IEP), which can be utilized in gene targeting by harnessing their novel ribozyme-based DNA integration mechanism termed "retrohoming." It is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex that contains the excised intron lariat RNA and an IEP with reverse transcriptase (RT) activity. The RNP recognizes targeting sites by exon-binding sequences 2 (EBS2)/intron-binding sequences 2 (IBS2), EBS1/IBS1, and EBS3/IBS3 bases pairing. Previously, we developed the TeI3c/4c intron as a thermophilic gene targeting system-Thermotargetron (TMT). However, we found that the targeting efficiency of TMT varies significantly at different targeting sites, which leads to a relatively low success rate. To further improve the success rate and gene-targeting efficiency of TMT, we constructed a Random Gene-targeting Plasmids Pool (RGPP) to analyze the sequence recognition preference of TMT. A new base pairing, located at the -8 site between EBS2/IBS2 and EBS1/IBS1 (named EBS2b-IBS2b), increased the success rate (2.45- to 5.07-fold) and significantly improved gene-targeting efficiency of TMT. A computer algorithm (TMT 1.0), based on the newly discovered sequence recognition roles, was also developed to facilitate the design of TMT gene-targeting primers. The present work could essentially expand the practicalities of TMT in the genome engineering of heat-tolerance mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria. IMPORTANCE The randomized base pairing in the interval of IBS2 and IBS1 of Tel3c/4c intron (-8 and -7 sites) in Thermotargetron (TMT) results in a low success rate and gene-targeting efficiency in bacteria. In the present work, we constructed a randomized gene-targeting plasmids pool (RGPP) to study whether there is a base preference in target sequences. Among all the successful "retrohoming" targets, we found that a new EBS2b-IBS2b base paring (A-8/T-8) significantly increased TMT's gene-targeting efficiency, and the concept is also applicable to other gene targets in redesigned gene-targeting plasmids pool in E. coli. The improved TMT is a promising tool for the genetic engineering of bacteria and could promote metabolic engineering and synthetic biology research in valuable microbes that recalcitrance for genetic manipulation.

Molecular Details of DNA Integration by CRISPR-Associated Proteins During Adaptation in Bacteria and Archaea

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins constitute an adaptive immune system in bacteria and archaea, where immunological memory is retained in the CRISPR locus as short pieces of the intruding nucleic acid, termed spacers. The adaptation to new infections occurs through the integration of a new spacer into the CRISPR array. For immune protection, spacers are transcribed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNA) that are used to guide the effector nuclease of the system in sequence-dependent target cleavage. Spacers originate as a prespacer from either DNA or RNA depending on the CRISPR-Cas system being observed, and the nearly universal Cas proteins, Cas1 and Cas2, insert the prespacer into the CRISPR locus during adaptation in all systems that contain them. The mechanism of site-specific prespacer integration varies across CRISPR classes and types, and distinct differences can even be found within the same subtype. In this review, the current knowledge on the mechanisms of prespacer integration in type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems will be described. Comparisons of the currently characterized type II-A systems show that distinct mechanisms exist within different members of this subtype and are correlated to sequence-specific interactions of Cas proteins and the DNA elements present in the CRISPR array. These observations indicate that nature has fine-tuned the mechanistic details while performing the basic step of DNA integration by Cas proteins, which offers unique advantages to develop Cas1-Cas2-based biotechnology.

Autobiography of a gut bacterium

Recordings of transient transcriptional events shed light on the gut microbiome

Structural biology of CRISPR-Cas immunity and genome editing enzymes

CRISPR-Cas systems provide resistance against foreign mobile genetic elements and have a wide range of genome editing and biotechnological applications. In this Review, we examine recent advances in understanding the molecular structures and mechanisms of enzymes comprising bacterial RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas immune systems and deployed for wide-ranging genome editing applications. We explore the adaptive and interference aspects of CRISPR-Cas function as well as open questions about the molecular mechanisms responsible for genome targeting. These structural insights reflect close evolutionary links between CRISPR-Cas systems and mobile genetic elements, including the origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems from DNA transposons, retrotransposons and toxin-antitoxin modules. We discuss how the evolution and structural diversity of CRISPR-Cas systems explain their functional complexity and utility as genome editing tools.

Different modes of spacer acquisition by the Staphylococcus epidermidis type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR-Cas systems provide prokaryotic organisms with an adaptive defense mechanism that acquires immunological memories of infections. This is accomplished by integration of short fragments from the genome of invaders such as phages and plasmids, called ‘spacers’, into the CRISPR locus of the host. Depending on their genetic composition, CRISPR-Cas systems can be classified into six types, I-VI, however spacer acquisition has been extensively studied only in type I and II systems. Here, we used an inducible spacer acquisition assay to study this process in the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Staphylococcus epidermidis, in the absence of phage selection. Similarly to type I and II spacer acquisition, this type III system uses Cas1 and Cas2 to preferentially integrate spacers from the chromosomal terminus and free dsDNA ends produced after DNA breaks, in a manner that is enhanced by the AddAB DNA repair complex. Surprisingly, a different mode of spacer acquisition from rRNA and tRNA loci, which spans only the transcribed sequences of these genes and is not enhanced by AddAB, was also detected. Therefore, our findings reveal both common mechanistic principles that may be conserved in all CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as unique and intriguing features of type III spacer acquisition.

Evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility of CRISPR systems

The principal biological function of bacterial and archaeal CRISPR systems is RNA-guided adaptive immunity against viruses and other mobile genetic elements (MGEs). These systems show remarkable evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility at multiple levels, including both the defense mechanisms that lead to direct, specific elimination of the target DNA or RNA and those that cause programmed cell death (PCD) or induction of dormancy. This flexibility is also evident in the recruitment of CRISPR systems for nondefense functions. Defective CRISPR systems or individual CRISPR components have been recruited by transposons for RNA-guided transposition, by plasmids for interplasmid competition, and by viruses for antidefense and interviral conflicts. Additionally, multiple highly derived CRISPR variants of yet unknown functions have been discovered. A major route of innovation in CRISPR evolution is the repurposing of diverged repeat variants encoded outside CRISPR arrays for various structural and regulatory functions. The evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility of CRISPR systems are striking manifestations of the ubiquitous interplay between defense and “normal” cellular functions.

The CRISPR systems show remarkable functional versatility beyond their principal function as an adaptive immune mechanism. This Essay discusses how derived CRISPR systems have been recruited by transposons on multiple occasions and mediate RNA-guided transposition; derived CRISPR RNAs are frequently recruited for regulatory functions.

Prokaryotic reverse transcriptases: from retroelements to specialized defense systems

Reverse transcriptases (RTs) catalyze the polymerization of DNA from an RNA template. These enzymes were first discovered in RNA tumor viruses in 1970, but it was not until 1989 that they were found in prokaryotes as a key component of retrons. Apart from RTs encoded by the 'selfish' mobile retroelements known as group II introns, prokaryotic RTs are extraordinarily diverse, but their function has remained elusive. However, recent studies have revealed that different lineages of prokaryotic RTs, including retrons, those associated with CRISPR-Cas systems, Abi-like RTs and other yet uncharacterized RTs, are key components of different lines of defense against phages and other mobile genetic elements. Prokaryotic RTs participate in various antiviral strategies, including abortive infection (Abi), in which the infected cell is induced to commit suicide to protect the host population, adaptive immunity, in which a memory of previous infection is used to build an efficient defense, and other as yet unidentified mechanisms. These prokaryotic enzymes are attracting considerable attention, both for use in cutting-edge technologies, such as genome editing, and as an emerging research topic. In this review, we discuss what is known about prokaryotic RTs, and the exciting evidence for their domestication from retroelements to create specialized defense systems.

A histidine kinase and a response regulator provide phage resistance to Marinomonas mediterranea via CRISPR-Cas regulation

CRISPR-Cas systems are used by many prokaryotes to defend against invading genetic elements. In many cases, more than one CRISPR-Cas system co-exist in the same cell. Marinomonas mediterranea MMB-1 possesses two CRISPR-Cas systems, of type I-F and III-B respectively, which collaborate in phage resistance raising questions on how their expression is regulated. This study shows that the expression of both systems is controlled by the histidine kinase PpoS and a response regulator, PpoR, identified and cloned in this study. These proteins show similarity to the global regulators BarA/UvrY. In addition, homologues to the sRNAs CsrB and CsrC and the gene coding for the post-transcriptional repressor CsrA have been also identified indicating the conservation of the elements of the BarA/UvrY regulatory cascade in M. mediterranea. RNA-Seq analyses have revealed that all these genetics elements are regulated by PpoS/R supporting their participation in the regulatory cascade. The regulation by PpoS and PpoR of the CRISPR-Cas systems plays a role in phage defense since mutants in these proteins show an increase in phage sensitivity.

Structural coordination between active sites of a CRISPR reverse transcriptase-integrase complex

CRISPR-Cas systems provide adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea, beginning with integration of foreign sequences into the host CRISPR genomic locus and followed by transcription and maturation of CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs). In some CRISPR systems, a reverse transcriptase (RT) fusion to the Cas1 integrase and Cas6 maturase creates a single protein that enables concerted sequence integration and crRNA production. To elucidate how the RT-integrase organizes distinct enzymatic activities, we present the cryo-EM structure of a Cas6-RT-Cas1-Cas2 CRISPR integrase complex. The structure reveals a heterohexamer in which the RT directly contacts the integrase and maturase domains, suggesting functional coordination between all three active sites. Together with biochemical experiments, our data support a model of sequential enzymatic activities that enable CRISPR sequence acquisition from RNA and DNA substrates. These findings highlight an expanded capacity of some CRISPR systems to acquire diverse sequences that direct CRISPR-mediated interference.

Heavily Armed Ancestors: CRISPR Immunity and Applications in Archaea with a Comparative Analysis of CRISPR Types in Sulfolobales

Prokaryotes are constantly coping with attacks by viruses in their natural environments and therefore have evolved an impressive array of defense systems. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is an adaptive immune system found in the majority of archaea and about half of bacteria which stores pieces of infecting viral DNA as spacers in genomic CRISPR arrays to reuse them for specific virus destruction upon a second wave of infection. In detail, small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) are transcribed from CRISPR arrays and incorporated into type-specific CRISPR effector complexes which further degrade foreign nucleic acids complementary to the crRNA. This review gives an overview of CRISPR immunity to newcomers in the field and an update on CRISPR literature in archaea by comparing the functional mechanisms and abundances of the diverse CRISPR types. A bigger fraction is dedicated to the versatile and prevalent CRISPR type III systems, as tremendous progress has been made recently using archaeal models in discerning the controlled molecular mechanisms of their unique tripartite mode of action including RNA interference, DNA interference and the unique cyclic-oligoadenylate signaling that induces promiscuous RNA shredding by CARF-domain ribonucleases. The second half of the review spotlights CRISPR in archaea outlining seminal in vivo and in vitro studies in model organisms of the euryarchaeal and crenarchaeal phyla, including the application of CRISPR-Cas for genome editing and gene silencing. In the last section, a special focus is laid on members of the crenarchaeal hyperthermophilic order Sulfolobales by presenting a thorough comparative analysis about the distribution and abundance of CRISPR-Cas systems, including arrays and spacers as well as CRISPR-accessory proteins in all 53 genomes available to date. Interestingly, we find that CRISPR type III and the DNA-degrading CRISPR type I complexes co-exist in more than two thirds of these genomes. Furthermore, we identified ring nuclease candidates in all but two genomes and found that they generally co-exist with the above-mentioned CARF domain ribonucleases Csx1/Csm6. These observations, together with published literature allowed us to draft a working model of how CRISPR-Cas systems and accessory proteins cross talk to establish native CRISPR anti-virus immunity in a Sulfolobales cell.

Real-time observation of CRISPR spacer acquisition by Cas1-Cas2 integrase

Cas1 integrase associates with Cas2 to insert short DNA fragments into a CRISPR array, establishing nucleic acid memory in prokaryotes. Here we applied single-molecule FRET methods to the Enterococcus faecalis (Efa) Cas1–Cas2 system to establish a kinetic framework describing target-searching, integration, and post-synapsis events. EfaCas1–Cas2 on its own is not able to find the CRISPR repeat in the CRISPR array; it only does so after prespacer loading. The leader sequence adjacent to the repeat further stabilizes EfaCas1–Cas2 contacts, enabling leader-side integration and subsequent spacer-side integration. The resulting post-synaptic complex has a surprisingly short mean lifetime. Remarkably, transcription efficiently resolves the postsynaptic complex and we predict that this is a conserved mechanism that ensures efficient and directional spacer integration in many CRISPR systems. Overall, our study provides a complete model of spacer acquisition, which can be harnessed for DNA-based information storage and cell lineage tracing technologies.

Approaches to study CRISPR RNA biogenesis and the key players involved

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins provide an inheritable and adaptive immune system against phages and foreign genetic elements in many bacteria and archaea. The three stages of CRISPR-Cas immunity comprise adaptation, CRISPR RNA (crRNA) biogenesis and interference. The maturation of the pre-crRNA into mature crRNAs, short guide RNAs that target invading nucleic acids, is crucial for the functionality of CRISPR-Cas defense systems. Mature crRNAs assemble with Cas proteins into the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) effector complex and guide the Cas nucleases to the cognate foreign DNA or RNA target. Experimental approaches to characterize these crRNAs, the specific steps toward their maturation and the involved factors, include RNA-seq analyses, enzyme assays, methods such as cryo-electron microscopy, the crystallization of proteins, or UV-induced protein-RNA crosslinking coupled to mass spectrometry analysis. Complex and multiple interactions exist between CRISPR-cas-encoded specific riboendonucleases such as Cas6, Cas5d and Csf5, endonucleases with dual functions in maturation and interference such as the enzymes of the Cas12 and Cas13 families, and nucleases belonging to the cell's degradosome such as RNase E, PNPase and RNase J, both in the maturation as well as in interference. The results of these studies have yielded a picture of unprecedented diversity of sequences, enzymes and biochemical mechanisms.

Fidelity of prespacer capture and processing is governed by the PAM-mediated interactions of Cas1-2 adaptation complex in CRISPR-Cas type I-E system

Prokaryotes deploy CRISPR-Cas-based RNA-guided adaptive immunity to fend off mobile genetic elements such as phages and plasmids. During CRISPR adaptation, which is the first stage of CRISPR immunity, the Cas1-2 integrase complex captures invader-derived prespacer DNA and specifically integrates it at the leader-repeat junction as spacers. For this integration, several variants of CRISPR-Cas systems use Cas4 as an indispensable nuclease for selectively processing the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) containing prespacers to a defined length. Surprisingly, however, a few CRISPR-Cas systems, such as type I-E, are bereft of Cas4. Despite the absence of Cas4, how the prespacers show impeccable conservation for length and PAM selection in type I-E remains intriguing. Here, using in vivo and in vitro integration assays, deep sequencing, and exonuclease footprinting, we show that Cas1-2/I-E-via the type I-E-specific extended C-terminal tail of Cas1-displays intrinsic affinity for PAM containing prespacers of variable length in Escherichia coli Although Cas1-2/I-E does not prune the prespacers, its binding protects the prespacer boundaries from exonuclease action. This ensures the pruning of exposed ends by exonucleases to aptly sized substrates for integration into the CRISPR locus. In summary, our work reveals that in a few CRISPR-Cas variants, such as type I-E, the specificity of PAM selection resides with Cas1-2, whereas the prespacer processing is co-opted by cellular non-Cas exonucleases, thereby offsetting the need for Cas4.

Spacer acquisition from RNA mediated by a natural reverse transcriptase-Cas1 fusion protein associated with a type III-D CRISPR-Cas system in Vibrio vulnificus

The association of reverse transcriptases (RTs) with CRISPR–Cas system has recently attracted interest because the RT activity appears to facilitate the RT-dependent acquisition of spacers from RNA molecules. However, our understanding of this spacer acquisition process remains limited. We characterized the in vivo acquisition of spacers mediated by an RT-Cas1 fusion protein linked to a type III-D system from Vibrio vulnificus strain YJ016, and showed that the adaptation module, consisting of the RT-Cas1 fusion, two different Cas2 proteins (A and B) and one of the two CRISPR arrays, was completely functional in a heterologous host. We found that mutations of the active site of the RT domain significantly decreased the acquisition of new spacers and showed that this RT-Cas1-associated adaptation module was able to incorporate spacers from RNA molecules into the CRISPR array. We demonstrated that the two Cas2 proteins of the adaptation module were required for spacer acquisition. Furthermore, we found that several sequence-specific features were required for the acquisition and integration of spacers derived from any region of the genome, with no bias along the 5′and 3′ends of coding sequences. This study provides new insight into the RT-Cas1 fusion protein-mediated acquisition of spacers from RNA molecules.

Spacer acquisition from RNA mediated by a natural reverse transcriptase-Cas1 fusion protein associated with a type III-D CRISPR-Cas system in Vibrio vulnificus

The association of reverse transcriptases (RTs) with CRISPR-Cas system has recently attracted interest because the RT activity appears to facilitate the RT-dependent acquisition of spacers from RNA molecules. However, our understanding of this spacer acquisition process remains limited. We characterized the in vivo acquisition of spacers mediated by an RT-Cas1 fusion protein linked to a type III-D system from Vibrio vulnificus strain YJ016, and showed that the adaptation module, consisting of the RT-Cas1 fusion, two different Cas2 proteins (A and B) and one of the two CRISPR arrays, was completely functional in a heterologous host. We found that mutations of the active site of the RT domain significantly decreased the acquisition of new spacers and showed that this RT-Cas1-associated adaptation module was able to incorporate spacers from RNA molecules into the CRISPR array. We demonstrated that the two Cas2 proteins of the adaptation module were required for spacer acquisition. Furthermore, we found that several sequence-specific features were required for the acquisition and integration of spacers derived from any region of the genome, with no bias along the 5'and 3'ends of coding sequences. This study provides new insight into the RT-Cas1 fusion protein-mediated acquisition of spacers from RNA molecules.

Recruitment of Reverse Transcriptase-Cas1 Fusion Proteins by Type VI-A CRISPR-Cas Systems

Type VI CRISPR-Cas systems contain a single effector nuclease (Cas13) that exclusively targets single-stranded RNA. It remains unknown how these systems acquire spacers. It has been suggested that type VI systems with adaptation modules can acquire spacers from RNA bacteriophages, but sequence similarities suggest that spacers may provide immunity to DNA phages. We searched databases for Cas13 proteins with linked RTs. We identified two different type VI-A systems with adaptation modules including an RT-Cas1 fusion and Cas2 proteins. Phylogenetic reconstruction analyses revealed that these adaptation modules were recruited by different effector Cas13a proteins, possibly from RT-associated type III-D systems within the bacterial classes Alphaproteobacteria and Clostridia. These type VI-A systems are predicted to acquire spacers from RNA molecules, paving the way for future studies investigating their role in bacterial adaptive immunity and biotechnological applications.

Multiple origins of reverse transcriptases linked to CRISPR-Cas systems

Prokaryotic genomes harbour a plethora of uncharacterized reverse transcriptases (RTs). RTs phylogenetically related to those encoded by group-II introns have been found associated with type III CRISPR-Cas systems, adjacent or fused at the C-terminus to Cas1. It is thought that these RTs may have a relevant function in the CRISPR immune response mediating spacer acquisition from RNA molecules. The origin and relationships of these RTs and the ways in which the various protein domains evolved remain matters of debate. We carried out a large survey of annotated RTs in databases (198,760 sequences) and constructed a large dataset of unique representative sequences (9,141). The combined phylogenetic reconstruction and identification of the RTs and their various protein domains in the vicinity of CRISPR adaptation and effector modules revealed three different origins for these RTs, consistent with their emergence on multiple occasions: a larger group that have evolved from group-II intron RTs, and two minor lineages that may have arisen more recently from Retron/retron-like sequences and Abi-P2 RTs, the latter associated with type I-C systems. We also identified a particular group of RTs associated with CRISPR-cas loci in clade 12, fused C-terminally to an archaeo-eukaryotic primase (AEP), a protein domain (AE-Prim_S_like) forming a particular family within the AEP proper clade. Together, these data provide new insight into the evolution of CRISPR-Cas/RT systems.