1
|
Norris JL, Rogers LO, Young G, Pytko KG, Dannenberg RL, Perreault S, Kaushik V, Antony E, Hedglin M. PCNA encircling primer/template junctions is eliminated by exchange of RPA for Rad51: Implications for the interplay between human DNA damage tolerance pathways. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2025.03.27.645792. [PMID: 40236028 PMCID: PMC11996364 DOI: 10.1101/2025.03.27.645792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2025]
Abstract
The DNA genome is constantly exposed to agents, such as ultraviolet radiation (UVR), that can alter or eliminate its coding properties through covalent modifications of the template bases. Many of these damaging modifications (i.e., lesions) persist into S-phase of the cell cycle where they may stall the canonical DNA replication machinery. In humans, these stalling events are circumvented by one of at least three interconnected DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways; translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), Template Switching (TS), and Homology-dependent Recombination (HDR). Currently, the functional interplay between these pathways is unclear, leaving wide gaps in our fundamental understanding of human DDT. To gain insights, we focus on the activation mechanisms of the DDT pathways. PCNA sliding clamps encircling primer/template (P/T) junctions of stalled replication sites are central to the activation of both TLS and TS whereas exchange of RPA for Rad51 filaments on the single strand DNA (ssDNA) sequences of stalled replication sites is central to HDR activation. Utilizing direct, ensemble FRET approaches developed by our lab, we independently monitor and directly compare PCNA occupancy and RPA/Rad51 exchange at P/T junctions under a variety of conditions that mimic in vivo scenarios. Collectively, the results reveal that assembly of stable Rad51 filaments at P/T junctions via RPA/Rad51 exchange causes complete and irreversible unloading of the resident PCNA, both in the presence and absence of an abundant PCNA-binding protein complex. Further investigations decipher the mechanism of RPA/Rad51 exchange-dependent unloading of PCNA. Collectively, these studies provide critical insights into the interplay between human DDT pathways and direction for future studies.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lahiri S, Hamilton G, Moore G, Goehring L, Huang TT, Jensen RB, Rothenberg E. BRCA2 prevents PARPi-mediated PARP1 retention to protect RAD51 filaments. Nature 2025; 640:1103-1111. [PMID: 40140565 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08749-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025]
Abstract
The tumour-suppressor protein BRCA2 has a central role in homology-directed DNA repair by enhancing the formation of RAD51 filaments on resected single-stranded DNA generated at double-stranded DNA breaks and stimulating RAD51 activity1,2. Individuals with BRCA2 mutations are predisposed to cancer; however, BRCA2-deficient tumours are often responsive to targeted therapy with PARP inhibitors (PARPi)3-6. The mechanism by which BRCA2 deficiency renders cells sensitive to PARPi but with minimal toxicity in cells heterozygous for BRCA2 mutations remains unclear. Here we identify a previously unknown role of BRCA2 that is directly linked to the effect of PARP1 inhibition. Using biochemical and single-molecule approaches, we demonstrate that PARPi-mediated PARP1 retention on a resected DNA substrate interferes with RAD51 filament stability and impairs RAD51-mediated DNA strand exchange. Full-length BRCA2 protects RAD51 filaments and counteracts the instability conferred by PARPi-mediated retention by preventing the binding of PARP1 to DNA. Extending these findings to a cellular context, we use quantitative single-molecule localization microscopy to show that BRCA2 prevents PARPi-induced PARP1 retention at homologous-recombination repair sites. By contrast, BRCA2-deficient cells exhibit increased PARP1 retention at these lesions in response to PARPi. These results provide mechanistic insights into the role of BRCA2 in maintaining RAD51 stability and protecting homologous-recombination repair sites by mitigating PARPi-mediated PARP1 retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudipta Lahiri
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - George Hamilton
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gemma Moore
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Liana Goehring
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tony T Huang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan B Jensen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Eli Rothenberg
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu Z, Nie C, Liao J, Ma Y, Zhou XA, Li X, Li S, Lin H, Luo Y, Cheng K, Mao Z, Zhang L, Pan Y, Chen Y, Wang W, Wang J. DDX39A resolves replication fork-associated RNA-DNA hybrids to balance fork protection and cleavage for genomic stability maintenance. Mol Cell 2025; 85:490-505.e11. [PMID: 39706185 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024]
Abstract
Safeguarding replication fork stability in transcriptionally active regions is crucial for precise DNA replication and mutation prevention. Here, we discover the pervasive existence of replication fork-associated RNA-DNA hybrids (RF-RDs) in transcriptionally active regions of human cells. These hybrids function as protective barriers, preventing DNA2-mediated nascent DNA degradation and replication fork collapse under replication stress. We also identify DDX39A as a RAD51-associated protein that binds to stalled forks and resolves RF-RDs, facilitating proper DNA2-mediated DNA resection and replication fork restart. Excessive dissolution of RF-RDs causes replication fork collapse and genomic instability, while insufficient dissolution of RF-RDs under replication stress increases fork stability, resulting in chemoresistance that can be reversed by eliminating RF-RDs. In summary, we elucidated the prevalence of RF-RDs at replication forks within transcriptionally active regions, revealed their pivotal role in safeguarding replication fork stability, and proposed that targeting RF-RDs holds promise for augmenting chemotherapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhanzhan Xu
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Chen Nie
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Junwei Liao
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yujie Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xiao Albert Zhou
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xiaoman Li
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Shiwei Li
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Haodong Lin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yefei Luo
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Kaiqi Cheng
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Zuchao Mao
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yichen Pan
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yuke Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Weibin Wang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
| | - Jiadong Wang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie H, Song L, Mao G, Han J, Pu J, Wu Z, Chen J, Zhou J, Huang J, Fang D, Liu T. Synergistic protection of nascent DNA at stalled forks by MSANTD4 and BRCA1/2-RAD51. Nat Chem Biol 2025:10.1038/s41589-024-01833-9. [PMID: 39809895 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-024-01833-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
The regressed arms of reversed replication forks exhibit structural similarities to one-ended double-stranded breaks and need to be protected against uncontrolled nucleolytic degradation. Here, we identify MSANTD4 (Myb/SANT-like DNA-binding domain-containing protein 4), a functionally uncharacterized protein that uniquely counters the replication protein A (RPA)-Bloom (BLM)/Werner syndrome helicase (WRN)-DNA replication helicase/nuclease 2 (DNA2) complex to safeguard reversed replication forks from detrimental degradation, independently of the breast cancer susceptibility proteins (BRCA1/2)-DNA repair protein RAD51 pathway. MSANTD4 specifically interacts with the junctions between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in DNA substrates harboring a 3' overhang, which resemble the structural features of regressed arms processed by WRN-DNA2. This DNA-binding capability allows MSANTD4 to accumulate at reversed forks, strategically antagonizing the RPA-BLM/WRN-DNA2 complex by impeding its access to the ssDNA-dsDNA junction of the regressed arms. Loss of MSANTD4 exacerbates genome instability induced by replication stress in BRCA1/2-deficient cells. Our findings unveil a collaborative defense mechanism orchestrated by MSANTD4 and BRCA1/2-RAD51, effectively counteracting nucleolytic attacks on the regressed arms and synergistically preserving the integrity of reversed forks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haihua Xie
- Department of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Cell Biology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lizhi Song
- MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Center for Life Sciences, Shaoxing Institute, Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China
| | - Genxiang Mao
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinhua Han
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiali Pu
- Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhibing Wu
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianwei Zhou
- Department of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
- Center for Life Sciences, Shaoxing Institute, Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China.
| | - Dong Fang
- MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Ting Liu
- Department of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Cell Biology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Geriatrics and Geriatrics Institute of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adolph MB, Cortez D. Mechanisms and regulation of replication fork reversal. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 141:103731. [PMID: 39089193 PMCID: PMC11877614 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication is remarkably accurate with estimates of only a handful of mutations per human genome per cell division cycle. Replication stress caused by DNA lesions, transcription-replication conflicts, and other obstacles to the replication machinery must be efficiently overcome in ways that minimize errors and maximize completion of DNA synthesis. Replication fork reversal is one mechanism that helps cells tolerate replication stress. This process involves reannealing of parental template DNA strands and generation of a nascent-nascent DNA duplex. While fork reversal may be beneficial by facilitating DNA repair or template switching, it must be confined to the appropriate contexts to preserve genome stability. Many enzymes have been implicated in this process including ATP-dependent DNA translocases like SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, HLTF, and the helicase FBH1. In addition, the RAD51 recombinase is required. Many additional factors and regulatory activities also act to ensure reversal is beneficial instead of yielding undesirable outcomes. Finally, reversed forks must also be stabilized and often need to be restarted to complete DNA synthesis. Disruption or deregulation of fork reversal causes a variety of human diseases. In this review we will describe the latest models for reversal and key mechanisms of regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison B Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dixit S, Nagraj T, Bhattacharya D, Saxena S, Sahoo S, Chittela RK, Somyajit K, Nagaraju G. RTEL1 helicase counteracts RAD51-mediated homologous recombination and fork reversal to safeguard replicating genomes. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114594. [PMID: 39116203 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) plays an essential role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), replication stress responses, and genome maintenance. However, unregulated HR during replication can impair genome duplication and compromise genome stability. The mechanisms underlying HR regulation during DNA replication are obscure. Here, we find that RTEL1 helicase, RAD51, and RAD51 paralogs are enriched at stalled replication sites. The absence of RTEL1 leads to an increase in the RAD51-mediated HR and fork reversal during replication and affects genome-wide replication, which can be rescued by co-depleting RAD51 and RAD51 paralogs. Interestingly, co-depletion of fork remodelers such as SMARCAL1/ZRANB3/HLTF/FBH1 and expression of HR-defective RAD51 mutants also rescues replication defects in RTEL1-deficient cells. The anti-recombinase function of RTEL1 during replication depends on its interaction with PCNA and helicase activity. Together, our data identify the role of RTEL1 helicase in restricting RAD51-mediated fork reversal and HR activity to facilitate error-free genome duplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suruchi Dixit
- Department of Biochemistry Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
| | - Tarun Nagraj
- Department of Biochemistry Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
| | | | - Sneha Saxena
- Department of Biochemistry Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
| | - Satyaranjan Sahoo
- Department of Biochemistry Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
| | - Rajani Kant Chittela
- Applied Genomics Section, Bioscience Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
| | - Kumar Somyajit
- Department of Biochemistry Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; Functional Genomics & Metabolism Research Unit, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M 5230, Denmark.
| | - Ganesh Nagaraju
- Department of Biochemistry Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Biagi L, Marozzi G, Malacaria E, Honda M, Aiello FA, Valenzisi P, Spies M, Franchitto A, Pichierri P. RAD52 prevents accumulation of Polα -dependent replication gaps at perturbed replication forks in human cells. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.04.12.536536. [PMID: 37090680 PMCID: PMC10120653 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.12.536536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Replication gaps can arise as a consequence of perturbed DNA replication and their accumulation might undermine the stability of the genome. Loss of RAD52, a protein involved in the regulation of fork reversal, promotes accumulation of parental ssDNA gaps during replication perturbation. Here, we demonstrate that this is due to the engagement of Polα downstream of the extensive degradation of perturbed replication forks after their reversal, and is not dependent on PrimPol. Polα is hyper-recruited at parental ssDNA in the absence of RAD52, and this recruitment is dependent on fork reversal enzymes and RAD51. Of note, we report that the interaction between Polα and RAD51 is stimulated by RAD52 inhibition, and Polα -dependent gap accumulation requires nucleation of RAD51 suggesting that it occurs downstream strand invasion. Altogether, our data indicate that RAD51- Polα -dependent repriming is essential to promote fork restart and limit DNA damage accumulation when RAD52 function is disabled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovica Di Biagi
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
| | - Giorgia Marozzi
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
| | - Eva Malacaria
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
| | - Masayoshi Honda
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242 (USA)
| | - Francesca Antonella Aiello
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
| | - Pasquale Valenzisi
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
| | - Maria Spies
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242 (USA)
| | - Annapaola Franchitto
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
| | - Pietro Pichierri
- Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Section, Genome Stability Group, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome (Italy)
- Istituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi - Roma Area Research - Via delle Medaglie d’Oro 305, 00136 Rome (Italy)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsaridou S, van Vugt MATM. FIRRM and FIGNL1: partners in the regulation of homologous recombination. Trends Genet 2024; 40:467-470. [PMID: 38494375 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
DNA repair through homologous recombination (HR) is of vital importance for maintaining genome stability and preventing tumorigenesis. RAD51 is the core component of HR, catalyzing the strand invasion and homology search. Here, we highlight recent findings on FIRRM and FIGNL1 as regulators of the dynamics of RAD51.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavroula Tsaridou
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel A T M van Vugt
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Balakrishnan S, Adolph M, Tsai MS, Akizuki T, Gallagher K, Cortez D, Chazin WJ. Structure of RADX and mechanism for regulation of RAD51 nucleofilaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2316491121. [PMID: 38466836 PMCID: PMC10962997 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2316491121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Replication fork reversal is a fundamental process required for resolution of encounters with DNA damage. A key step in the stabilization and eventual resolution of reversed forks is formation of RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments on exposed single strand DNA (ssDNA). To avoid genome instability, RAD51 filaments are tightly controlled by a variety of positive and negative regulators. RADX (RPA-related RAD51-antagonist on the X chromosome) is a recently discovered negative regulator that binds tightly to ssDNA, directly interacts with RAD51, and regulates replication fork reversal and stabilization in a context-dependent manner. Here, we present a structure-based investigation of RADX's mechanism of action. Mass photometry experiments showed that RADX forms multiple oligomeric states in a concentration-dependent manner, with a predominance of trimers in the presence of ssDNA. The structure of RADX, which has no structurally characterized orthologs, was determined ab initio by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) from maps in the 2 to 4 Å range. The structure reveals the molecular basis for RADX oligomerization and the coupled multi-valent binding of ssDNA binding. The interaction of RADX with RAD51 filaments was imaged by negative stain EM, which showed a RADX oligomer at the end of filaments. Based on these results, we propose a model in which RADX functions by capping and restricting the end of RAD51 filaments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Balakrishnan
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37237
| | - Madison Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37237
| | - Miaw-Sheue Tsai
- Biological Systems and Bioengineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA94720
| | - Tae Akizuki
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37237
| | - Kaitlyn Gallagher
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37237
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37237
| | - Walter J. Chazin
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37237
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37235
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tischler JD, Tsuchida H, Bosire R, Oda TT, Park A, Adeyemi RO. FLIP(C1orf112)-FIGNL1 complex regulates RAD51 chromatin association to promote viability after replication stress. Nat Commun 2024; 15:866. [PMID: 38286805 PMCID: PMC10825145 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45139-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) plays critical roles in repairing lesions that arise during DNA replication and is thus essential for viability. RAD51 plays important roles during replication and HR, however, how RAD51 is regulated downstream of nucleofilament formation and how the varied RAD51 functions are regulated is not clear. We have investigated the protein c1orf112/FLIP that previously scored in genome-wide screens for mediators of DNA inter-strand crosslink (ICL) repair. Upon ICL agent exposure, FLIP loss leads to marked cell death, elevated chromosomal instability, increased micronuclei formation, altered cell cycle progression and increased DNA damage signaling. FLIP is recruited to damage foci and forms a complex with FIGNL1. Both proteins have epistatic roles in ICL repair, forming a stable complex. Mechanistically, FLIP loss leads to increased RAD51 amounts and foci on chromatin both with or without exogenous DNA damage, defective replication fork progression and reduced HR competency. We posit that FLIP is essential for limiting RAD51 levels on chromatin in the absence of damage and for RAD51 dissociation from nucleofilaments to properly complete HR. Failure to do so leads to replication slowing and inability to complete repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D Tischler
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Hiroshi Tsuchida
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | | | - Tommy T Oda
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA
| | - Ana Park
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA
| | - Richard O Adeyemi
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhao Y, Hou K, Li Y, Hao S, Liu Y, Na Y, Li C, Cui J, Xu X, Wu X, Wang H. Human HELQ regulates DNA end resection at DNA double-strand breaks and stalled replication forks. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:12207-12223. [PMID: 37897354 PMCID: PMC10711563 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Following a DNA double strand break (DSB), several nucleases and helicases coordinate to generate single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with 3' free ends, facilitating precise DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). The same nucleases can act on stalled replication forks, promoting nascent DNA degradation and fork instability. Interestingly, some HR factors, such as CtIP and BRCA1, have opposite regulatory effects on the two processes, promoting end resection at DSB but inhibiting the degradation of nascent DNA on stalled forks. However, the reason why nuclease actions are regulated by different mechanisms in two DNA metabolism is poorly understood. We show that human HELQ acts as a DNA end resection regulator, with opposing activities on DNA end resection at DSBs and on stalled forks as seen for other regulators. Mechanistically, HELQ helicase activity is required for EXO1-mediated DSB end resection, while ssDNA-binding capacity of HELQ is required for its recruitment to stalled forks, facilitating fork protection and preventing chromosome aberrations caused by replication stress. Here, HELQ synergizes with CtIP but not BRCA1 or BRCA2 to protect stalled forks. These findings reveal an unanticipated role of HELQ in regulating DNA end resection at DSB and stalled forks, which is important for maintaining genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqin Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Kaiping Hou
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Youhang Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Shuailin Hao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Yinan Na
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Chao Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Jian Cui
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Xingzhi Xu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory for Genome Stability & Disease Prevention and Carson International Cancer Center, Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, China Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Hailong Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
De Bragança S, Dillingham MS, Moreno-Herrero F. Recent insights into eukaryotic double-strand DNA break repair unveiled by single-molecule methods. Trends Genet 2023; 39:924-940. [PMID: 37806853 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Genome integrity and maintenance are essential for the viability of all organisms. A wide variety of DNA damage types have been described, but double-strand breaks (DSBs) stand out as one of the most toxic DNA lesions. Two major pathways account for the repair of DSBs: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Both pathways involve complex DNA transactions catalyzed by proteins that sequentially or cooperatively work to repair the damage. Single-molecule methods allow visualization of these complex transactions and characterization of the protein:DNA intermediates of DNA repair, ultimately allowing a comprehensive breakdown of the mechanisms underlying each pathway. We review current understanding of the HR and NHEJ responses to DSBs in eukaryotic cells, with a particular emphasis on recent advances through the use of single-molecule techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara De Bragança
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark S Dillingham
- DNA:Protein Interactions Unit, School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
| | - Fernando Moreno-Herrero
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adolph MB, Garje AS, Balakrishnan S, Morati F, Modesti M, Chazin WJ, Cortez D. CRISPR-dependent Base Editing Screens Identify Separation of Function Mutants of RADX with Altered RAD51 Regulatory Activity. J Mol Biol 2023; 435:168236. [PMID: 37572935 PMCID: PMC10530557 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
RAD51 forms nucleoprotein filaments to promote homologous recombination, replication fork reversal, and fork protection. Numerous factors regulate the stability of these filaments and improper regulation leads to genomic instability and ultimately disease including cancer. RADX is a single stranded DNA binding protein that modulates RAD51 filament stability. Here, we utilize a CRISPR-dependent base editing screen to tile mutations across RADX to delineate motifs required for RADX function. We identified separation of function mutants of RADX that bind DNA and RAD51 but have a reduced ability to stimulate its ATP hydrolysis activity. Cells expressing these RADX mutants accumulate RAD51 on chromatin, exhibit replication defects, have reduced growth, accumulate DNA damage, and are hypersensitive to DNA damage and replication stress. These results indicate that RADX must promote RAD51 ATP turnover to regulate RAD51 and genome stability during DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison B Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Atharv S Garje
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Swati Balakrishnan
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Florian Morati
- Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Department of Genome Integrity, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Mauro Modesti
- Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Department of Genome Integrity, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Walter J Chazin
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tischler JD, Tsuchida H, Oda TT, Park A, Adeyemi RO. RADIF(C1orf112)-FIGNL1 Complex Regulates RAD51 Chromatin Association to Promote Viability After Replication Stress. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.09.25.556595. [PMID: 37808755 PMCID: PMC10557588 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.25.556595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) plays critical roles in repairing lesions that arise during DNA replication and is thus essential for viability. RAD51 plays important roles during replication and HR, however, how RAD51 is regulated downstream of nucleofilament formation and how the varied RAD51 functions are regulated is not clear. We have investigated the poorly characterized protein c1orf112/RADIF that previously scored in genome-wide screens for mediators of DNA inter-strand crosslink (ICL) repair. Upon ICL agent exposure, RADIF loss leads to marked cell death, elevated chromosomal instability, increased micronuclei formation, altered cell cycle progression and increased DNA damage signaling. RADIF is recruited to damage foci and forms a complex with FIGNL1. Both proteins have epistatic roles in ICL repair, forming a co-stable complex. Mechanistically, RADIF loss leads to increased RAD51 amounts and foci on chromatin both with or without exogenous DNA damage, defective replication fork progression and reduced HR competency. We posit that RADIF is essential for limiting RAD51 levels on chromatin in the absence of damage and for RAD51 dissociation from nucleofilaments to properly complete HR. Failure to do so leads to replication slowing and inability to complete repair.
Collapse
|
15
|
Balakrishnan S, Adolph M, Tsai MS, Gallagher K, Cortez D, Chazin WJ. Structure of RADX and mechanism for regulation of RAD51 nucleofilaments. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.09.19.558089. [PMID: 37786681 PMCID: PMC10541619 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.19.558089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Replication fork reversal is a fundamental process required for resolution of encounters with DNA damage. A key step in the stabilization and eventual resolution of reversed forks is formation of RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments on exposed ssDNA. To avoid genome instability, RAD51 filaments are tightly controlled by a variety of positive and negative regulators. RADX is a recently discovered negative regulator that binds tightly to ssDNA, directly interacts with RAD51, and regulates replication fork reversal and stabilization in a context-dependent manner. Here we present a structure-based investigation of RADX's mechanism of action. Mass photometry experiments showed that RADX forms multiple oligomeric states in a concentration dependent manner, with a predominance of trimers in the presence of ssDNA. The structure of RADX, which has no structurally characterized orthologs, was determined ab initio by cryo-electron microscopy (EM) from maps in the 2-3 Å range. The structure reveals the molecular basis for RADX oligomerization and binding of ssDNA binding. The binding of RADX to RAD51 filaments was imaged by negative stain EM, which showed a RADX oligomer at the end of filaments. Based on these results, we propose a model in which RADX functions by capping and restricting the growing end of RAD51 filaments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Balakrishnan
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - Madison Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - Miaw-Sheue Tsai
- Biological Systems and Bioengineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Gallagher
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - Walter J. Chazin
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Lead contact
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pinedo-Carpio E, Dessapt J, Beneyton A, Sacre L, Bérubé MA, Villot R, Lavoie EG, Coulombe Y, Blondeau A, Boulais J, Malina A, Luo VM, Lazaratos AM, Côté JF, Mallette FA, Guarné A, Masson JY, Fradet-Turcotte A, Orthwein A. FIRRM cooperates with FIGNL1 to promote RAD51 disassembly during DNA repair. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadf4082. [PMID: 37556550 PMCID: PMC10411901 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf4082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs) represent complex lesions that compromise genomic stability. Several pathways have been involved in ICL repair, but the extent of factors involved in the resolution of ICL-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) remains poorly defined. Using CRISPR-based genomics, we identified FIGNL1 interacting regulator of recombination and mitosis (FIRRM) as a sensitizer of the ICL-inducing agent mafosfamide. Mechanistically, we showed that FIRRM, like its interactor Fidgetin like 1 (FIGNL1), contributes to the resolution of RAD51 foci at ICL-induced DSBs. While the stability of FIGNL1 and FIRRM is interdependent, expression of a mutant of FIRRM (∆WCF), which stabilizes the protein in the absence of FIGNL1, allows the resolution of RAD51 foci and cell survival, suggesting that FIRRM has FIGNL1-independent function during DNA repair. In line with this model, FIRRM binds preferentially single-stranded DNA in vitro, raising the possibility that it directly contributes to RAD51 disassembly by interacting with DNA. Together, our findings establish FIRRM as a promoting factor of ICL repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Pinedo-Carpio
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Julien Dessapt
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Adèle Beneyton
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Lauralicia Sacre
- Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3G 0B1, Canada
| | - Marie-Anne Bérubé
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Romain Villot
- Département de Biochimie et Médecine Moléculaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, QC H1T 2M4 Canada
| | - Elise G. Lavoie
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Yan Coulombe
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Andréanne Blondeau
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Jonathan Boulais
- Montreal Clinical Research Institute (IRCM), Montreal, QC H2W 1R7, Canada
| | - Abba Malina
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, QC H1T 2M4 Canada
| | - Vincent M. Luo
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Anna-Maria Lazaratos
- Département de Biochimie et Médecine Moléculaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
- Montreal Clinical Research Institute (IRCM), Montreal, QC H2W 1R7, Canada
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Montreal Clinical Research Institute (IRCM), Montreal, QC H2W 1R7, Canada
- Département de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7 Canada
| | - Frédérick A. Mallette
- Département de Biochimie et Médecine Moléculaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, QC H1T 2M4 Canada
- Département de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7 Canada
| | - Alba Guarné
- Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3G 0B1, Canada
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Amélie Fradet-Turcotte
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Alexandre Orthwein
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Montreal Clinical Research Institute (IRCM), Montreal, QC H2W 1R7, Canada
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stok C, Tsaridou S, van den Tempel N, Everts M, Wierenga E, Bakker FJ, Kok Y, Alves IT, Jae LT, Raas MWD, Huis In 't Veld PJ, de Boer HR, Bhattacharya A, Karanika E, Warner H, Chen M, van de Kooij B, Dessapt J, Ter Morsche L, Perepelkina P, Fradet-Turcotte A, Guryev V, Tromer EC, Chan KL, Fehrmann RSN, van Vugt MATM. FIRRM/C1orf112 is synthetic lethal with PICH and mediates RAD51 dynamics. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112668. [PMID: 37347663 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Joint DNA molecules are natural byproducts of DNA replication and repair. Persistent joint molecules give rise to ultrafine DNA bridges (UFBs) in mitosis, compromising sister chromatid separation. The DNA translocase PICH (ERCC6L) has a central role in UFB resolution. A genome-wide loss-of-function screen is performed to identify the genetic context of PICH dependency. In addition to genes involved in DNA condensation, centromere stability, and DNA-damage repair, we identify FIGNL1-interacting regulator of recombination and mitosis (FIRRM), formerly known as C1orf112. We find that FIRRM interacts with and stabilizes the AAA+ ATPase FIGNL1. Inactivation of either FIRRM or FIGNL1 results in UFB formation, prolonged accumulation of RAD51 at nuclear foci, and impaired replication fork dynamics and consequently impairs genome maintenance. Combined, our data suggest that inactivation of FIRRM and FIGNL1 dysregulates RAD51 dynamics at replication forks, resulting in persistent DNA lesions and a dependency on PICH to preserve cell viability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Stok
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stavroula Tsaridou
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nathalie van den Tempel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke Everts
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Elles Wierenga
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Femke J Bakker
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yannick Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Inês Teles Alves
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas T Jae
- Gene Center and Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen-Straße 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian W D Raas
- Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute, Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT Utrecht, the Netherlands; Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Pim J Huis In 't Veld
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - H Rudolf de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arkajyoti Bhattacharya
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eleftheria Karanika
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Harry Warner
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mengting Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bert van de Kooij
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Julien Dessapt
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC GIR 3S3, Canada
| | - Lars Ter Morsche
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Polina Perepelkina
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Amelie Fradet-Turcotte
- CHU de Québec Research Center-Université Laval (L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec), Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC GIR 3S3, Canada
| | - Victor Guryev
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eelco C Tromer
- Cell Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Kok-Lung Chan
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel A T M van Vugt
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carney SV, Banerjee K, Mujeeb A, Zhu B, Haase S, Varela ML, Kadiyala P, Tronrud CE, Zhu Z, Mukherji D, Gorla P, Sun Y, Tagett R, Núñez FJ, Luo M, Luo W, Ljungman M, Liu Y, Xia Z, Schwendeman A, Qin T, Sartor MA, Costello JF, Cahill DP, Lowenstein PR, Castro MG. Zinc Finger MYND-Type Containing 8 (ZMYND8) Is Epigenetically Regulated in Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) Glioma to Promote Radioresistance. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1763-1782. [PMID: 36692427 PMCID: PMC10159884 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) alters the epigenetic regulation of chromatin, leading to a hypermethylation phenotype in adult glioma. This work focuses on identifying gene targets epigenetically dysregulated by mIDH1 to confer therapeutic resistance to ionizing radiation (IR). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We evaluated changes in the transcriptome and epigenome in a radioresistant mIDH1 patient-derived glioma cell culture (GCC) following treatment with an mIDH1-specific inhibitor, AGI-5198. We identified Zinc Finger MYND-Type Containing 8 (ZMYND8) as a potential target of mIDH1 reprogramming. We suppressed ZMYND8 expression by shRNA knockdown and genetic knockout (KO) in mIDH1 glioma cells and then assessed cellular viability to IR. We assessed the sensitivity of mIDH1 GCCS to pharmacologic inhibition of ZMYND8-interacting partners: HDAC, BRD4, and PARP. RESULTS Inhibition of mIDH1 leads to an upregulation of gene networks involved in replication stress. We found that the expression of ZMYND8, a regulator of DNA damage response, was decreased in three patient-derived mIDH1 GCCs after treatment with AGI-5198. Knockdown of ZMYND8 expression sensitized mIDH1 GCCs to radiotherapy marked by decreased cellular viability. Following IR, mIDH1 glioma cells with ZMYND8 KO exhibit significant phosphorylation of ATM and sustained γH2AX activation. ZMYND8 KO mIDH1 GCCs were further responsive to IR when treated with either BRD4 or HDAC inhibitors. PARP inhibition further enhanced the efficacy of radiotherapy in ZMYND8 KO mIDH1 glioma cells. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate the impact of ZMYND8 in the maintenance of genomic integrity and repair of IR-induced DNA damage in mIDH1 glioma. See related commentary by Sachdev et al., p. 1648.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen V Carney
- Cancer Biology Training Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kaushik Banerjee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anzar Mujeeb
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Brandon Zhu
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan College of Engineering, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Santiago Haase
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maria L Varela
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Padma Kadiyala
- Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Claire E Tronrud
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ziwen Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Devarshi Mukherji
- Neuroscience, University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA), Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Preethi Gorla
- Neuroscience, University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA), Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rebecca Tagett
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Felipe J Núñez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maowu Luo
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Weibo Luo
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Pharmacology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mats Ljungman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Environmental Health Science, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yayuan Liu
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ziyun Xia
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anna Schwendeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Tingting Qin
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maureen A Sartor
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pedro R Lowenstein
- Cancer Biology Training Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Biosciences Initiative in Brain Cancer, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maria G Castro
- Cancer Biology Training Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Biosciences Initiative in Brain Cancer, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
RAD51 paralogs: Expanding roles in replication stress responses and repair. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2022; 67:102313. [PMID: 36343481 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mammalian RAD51 paralogs are essential for cell survival and are critical for RAD51-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination (HR). However, the molecular mechanism by which RAD51 paralogs participate in HR is largely unclear. Germline mutations in RAD51 paralogs are associated with breast and ovarian cancers and Fanconi anemia-like disorder, underscoring the crucial roles of RAD51 paralogs in genome maintenance and tumor suppression. Despite their discovery over three decades ago, the essential functions of RAD51 paralogs in cell survival and genome stability remain obscure. Recent studies unravel DSB repair independent functions of RAD51 paralogs in replication stress responses. Here, we highlight the recent findings that uncovered the novel functions of RAD51 paralogs in replication fork progression, its stability, and restart and discuss RAD51 paralogs as a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhu C, Iwase M, Li Z, Wang F, Quinet A, Vindigni A, Shao J. Profilin-1 regulates DNA replication forks in a context-dependent fashion by interacting with SNF2H and BOD1L. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6531. [PMID: 36319634 PMCID: PMC9626489 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34310-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication forks are tightly controlled by a large protein network consisting of well-known core regulators and many accessory factors which remain functionally undefined. In this study, we report previously unknown nuclear functions of the actin-binding factor profilin-1 (PFN1) in DNA replication, which occur in a context-dependent fashion and require its binding to poly-L-proline (PLP)-containing proteins instead of actin. In unperturbed cells, PFN1 increases DNA replication initiation and accelerates fork progression by binding and stimulating the PLP-containing nucleosome remodeler SNF2H. Under replication stress, PFN1/SNF2H increases fork stalling and functionally collaborates with fork reversal enzymes to enable the over-resection of unprotected forks. In addition, PFN1 binds and functionally attenuates the PLP-containing fork protector BODL1 to increase the resection of a subset of stressed forks. Accordingly, raising nuclear PFN1 level decreases genome stability and cell survival during replication stress. Thus, PFN1 is a multi-functional regulator of DNA replication with exploitable anticancer potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuige Zhu
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mari Iwase
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ziqian Li
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Faliang Wang
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Annabel Quinet
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- UMR Genetic Stability Stem Cells and Radiation, University of Paris and University of Paris-Saclay, INSERM, iRCM/IBFJ CEA, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Alessandro Vindigni
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jieya Shao
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang Z, Jia R, Wang L, Yang Q, Hu X, Fu Q, Zhang X, Li W, Ren Y. The Emerging Roles of Rad51 in Cancer and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target. Front Oncol 2022; 12:935593. [PMID: 35875146 PMCID: PMC9300834 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.935593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Defects in DNA repair pathways are emerging hallmarks of cancer. Accurate DNA repairs and replications are essential for genomic stability. Cancer cells require residual DNA repair capabilities to repair the damage from replication stress and genotoxic anti-tumor agents. Defective DNA repair also promotes the accumulation of genomic changes that eventually lead to tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and therapeutic resistance to DNA-damaging anti-tumor agents. Rad51 recombinase is a critical effector of homologous recombination, which is an essential DNA repair mechanism for double-strand breaks. Rad51 has been found to be upregulated in many malignant solid tumors, and is correlated with poor prognosis. In multiple tumor types, Rad51 is critical for tumor metabolism, metastasis and drug resistance. Herein, we initially introduced the structure, expression pattern of Rad51 and key Rad51 mediators involved in homologous recombination. Additionally, we primarily discussed the role of Rad51 in tumor metabolism, metastasis, resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyi Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Renxiang Jia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Linlin Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Qiwei Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaohai Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xinyu Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wenya Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi Ren
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mohamed T, Adolph MB, Cortez D. Oligomerization of DNA replication regulatory protein RADX is essential to maintain replication fork stability. J Biol Chem 2022; 298:101672. [PMID: 35120927 PMCID: PMC8902620 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome integrity requires complete and accurate DNA replication once per cell division cycle. Replication stress poses obstacles to this process that must be overcome to prevent replication fork collapse. An important regulator of replication fork stability is the RAD51 protein, which promotes replication fork reversal and protects nascent DNA strands from nuclease-mediated degradation. Many regulatory proteins control these RAD51 activities, including RADX, which binds both ssDNA and RAD51 at replication forks to ensure that fork reversal is confined to stalled forks. Many ssDNA-binding proteins function as hetero- or homo-oligomers. In this study, we addressed whether this is also the case for RADX. Using biochemical and genetic approaches, we found that RADX acts as a homo-oligomer to control replication fork stability. RADX oligomerizes using at least two different interaction surfaces, including one mapped to a C-terminal region. We demonstrate that mutations in this region prevent oligomerization and prevent RADX function in cells, and that addition of a heterologous dimerization domain to the oligomerization mutants restored their ability to regulate replication. Taken together, our results demonstrate that like many ssDNA-binding proteins, oligomerization is essential for RADX-mediated regulation of genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Mohamed
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Madison B Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rossi MJ, DiDomenico SF, Patel M, Mazin AV. RAD52: Paradigm of Synthetic Lethality and New Developments. Front Genet 2021; 12:780293. [PMID: 34887904 PMCID: PMC8650160 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.780293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks and inter-strand cross-links are the most harmful types of DNA damage that cause genomic instability that lead to cancer development. The highest fidelity pathway for repairing damaged double-stranded DNA is termed Homologous recombination (HR). Rad52 is one of the key HR proteins in eukaryotes. Although it is critical for most DNA repair and recombination events in yeast, knockouts of mammalian RAD52 lack any discernable phenotypes. As a consequence, mammalian RAD52 has been long overlooked. That is changing now, as recent work has shown RAD52 to be critical for backup DNA repair pathways in HR-deficient cancer cells. Novel findings have shed light on RAD52's biochemical activities. RAD52 promotes DNA pairing (D-loop formation), single-strand DNA and DNA:RNA annealing, and inverse strand exchange. These activities contribute to its multiple roles in DNA damage repair including HR, single-strand annealing, break-induced replication, and RNA-mediated repair of DNA. The contributions of RAD52 that are essential to the viability of HR-deficient cancer cells are currently under investigation. These new findings make RAD52 an attractive target for the development of anti-cancer therapies against BRCA-deficient cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Rossi
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Prado F. Non-Recombinogenic Functions of Rad51, BRCA2, and Rad52 in DNA Damage Tolerance. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12101550. [PMID: 34680945 PMCID: PMC8535942 DOI: 10.3390/genes12101550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The DNA damage tolerance (DDT) response is aimed to timely and safely complete DNA replication by facilitating the advance of replication forks through blocking lesions. This process is associated with an accumulation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA), both at the fork and behind the fork. Lesion bypass and ssDNA filling can be performed by translation synthesis (TLS) and template switching mechanisms. TLS uses low-fidelity polymerases to incorporate a dNTP opposite the blocking lesion, whereas template switching uses a Rad51/ssDNA nucleofilament and the sister chromatid to bypass the lesion. Rad51 is loaded at this nucleofilament by two mediator proteins, BRCA2 and Rad52, and these three factors are critical for homologous recombination (HR). Here, we review recent advances showing that Rad51, BRCA2, and Rad52 perform some of these functions through mechanisms that do not require the strand exchange activity of Rad51: the formation and protection of reversed fork structures aimed to bypass blocking lesions, and the promotion of TLS. These findings point to the central HR proteins as potential molecular switches in the choice of the mechanism of DDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Prado
- Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa (CABIMER), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41092 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Morati F, Modesti M. Insights into the control of RAD51 nucleoprotein filament dynamics from single-molecule studies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2021; 71:182-187. [PMID: 34571340 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Genomic integrity depends on the RecA/RAD51 protein family. Discovered over five decades ago with the founder bacterial RecA protein, eukaryotic RAD51 is an ATP-dependent DNA strand transferase implicated in DNA double-strand break and single-strand gap repair, and in dealing with stressed DNA replication forks. RAD51 assembles as a nucleoprotein filament around single-stranded DNA to promote homology recognition in a duplex DNA and subsequent strand exchange. While the intrinsic dynamics of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament has been extensively studied, a plethora of accessory factors control its dynamics. Understanding how modulators control filament dynamics is at the heart of current research efforts. Here, we describe recent advances in RAD51 control mechanisms obtained specifically using fluorescence-based single-molecule techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Morati
- Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université UM105, Marseille, France
| | - Mauro Modesti
- Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CNRS UMR7258, Inserm U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université UM105, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Krishnamoorthy A, Jackson J, Mohamed T, Adolph M, Vindigni A, Cortez D. RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks. Mol Cell 2021; 81:3007-3017.e5. [PMID: 34107305 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
RAD51 facilitates replication fork reversal and protects reversed forks from nuclease degradation. Although potentially a useful replication stress response mechanism, unregulated fork reversal can cause genome instability. Here we show that RADX, a single-strand DNA binding protein that binds to and destabilizes RAD51 nucleofilaments, can either inhibit or promote fork reversal depending on replication stress levels. RADX inhibits fork reversal at elongating forks, thereby preventing fork slowing and collapse. Paradoxically, in the presence of persistent replication stress, RADX localizes to stalled forks to generate reversed fork structures. Consequently, inactivating RADX prevents fork-reversal-dependent telomere dysfunction in the absence of RTEL1 and blocks nascent strand degradation when fork protection factors are inactivated. Addition of RADX increases SMARCAL1-dependent fork reversal in conditions in which pre-binding RAD51 to a model fork substrate is inhibitory. Thus, RADX directly interacts with RAD51 and single-strand DNA to confine fork reversal to persistently stalled forks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - Jessica Jackson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Taha Mohamed
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - Madison Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA
| | - Alessandro Vindigni
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37237, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Qiu S, Jiang G, Cao L, Huang J. Replication Fork Reversal and Protection. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:670392. [PMID: 34041245 PMCID: PMC8141627 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.670392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
During genome replication, replication forks often encounter obstacles that impede their progression. Arrested forks are unstable structures that can give rise to collapse and rearrange if they are not properly processed and restarted. Replication fork reversal is a critical protective mechanism in higher eukaryotic cells in response to replication stress, in which forks reverse their direction to form a Holliday junction-like structure. The reversed replication forks are protected from nuclease degradation by DNA damage repair proteins, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51. Some of these molecules work cooperatively, while others have unique functions. Once the stress is resolved, the replication forks can restart with the help of enzymes, including human RECQ1 helicase, but restart will not be considered here. Here, we review research on the key factors and mechanisms required for the remodeling and protection of stalled replication forks in mammalian cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,The MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Haining, China
| | - Guixing Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liping Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,The MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|