1
|
Zhou DH, Jeon J, Farheen N, Friedman LJ, Kondev J, Buratowski S, Gelles J. Mechanisms of synergistic Mediator recruitment in RNA polymerase II transcription activation revealed by single-molecule fluorescence. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.12.10.627625. [PMID: 39713438 PMCID: PMC11661148 DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.10.627625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
Transcription activators trigger transcript production by RNA Polymerase II (RNApII) via the Mediator coactivator complex. Here the dynamics of activator, Mediator, and RNApII binding at promoter DNA were analyzed using multi-wavelength single-molecule microscopy of fluorescently labeled proteins in budding yeast nuclear extract. Binding of Mediator and RNApII to the template required activator and an upstream activator sequence (UAS), but not a core promoter. While Mediator and RNApII sometimes bind as a pre-formed complex, more commonly Mediator binds first and subsequently recruits RNApII to form a preinitiation complex precursor (pre-PIC) tethered to activators on the UAS. Interestingly, Mediator occupancy has a highly non-linear response to activator concentration, and fluorescence intensity measurements show Mediator preferentially associates with templates having at least two activators bound. Statistical mechanical modeling suggests this "synergy" is not due to cooperative binding between activators, but instead occurs when multiple DNA-bound activator molecules simultaneously interact with a single Mediator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H. Zhou
- Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453
| | - Jongcheol Jeon
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Nida Farheen
- Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453
| | | | - Jane Kondev
- Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453
| | - Stephen Buratowski
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Jeff Gelles
- Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee H, Friedman MJ, Kim SB, Oh S. DNA regulatory element cooperation and competition in transcription. BMB Rep 2024; 57:509-520. [PMID: 39523506 PMCID: PMC11693600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Regulation of eukaryotic transcription is a complex process that enables precise temporal and spatial control of gene expression. Promoters, which are cis-regulatory elements (CREs) located proximal to the transcription start site (TSS), selectively integrate regulatory cues from distal CREs, or enhancers, and their associated transcriptional machinery. In this review, we discuss current knowledge regarding CRE cooperation and competition impacting gene expression, including features of enhancer-promoter, enhancer-enhancer, and promoter-promoter interplay. We also provide an overview of recent insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms that facilitate physical and functional interaction of regulatory elements, such as the involvement of enhancer RNAs and biomolecular condensates. [BMB Reports 2024; 57(12): 509-520].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haram Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Korea, Seoul 01795, Korea
| | - Meyer Joseph Friedman
- Department and School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA, Seoul 01795, Korea
| | - Sang Bum Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea
| | - Soohwan Oh
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Korea, Seoul 01795, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mindel V, Brodsky S, Yung H, Manadre W, Barkai N. Revisiting the model for coactivator recruitment: Med15 can select its target sites independent of promoter-bound transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:12093-12111. [PMID: 39187372 PMCID: PMC11551773 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Activation domains (ADs) within transcription factors (TFs) induce gene expression by recruiting coactivators such as the Mediator complex. Coactivators lack DNA binding domains (DBDs) and are assumed to passively follow their recruiting TFs. This is supported by direct AD-coactivator interactions seen in vitro but has not yet been tested in living cells. To examine that, we targeted two Med15-recruiting ADs to a range of budding yeast promoters through fusion with different DBDs. The DBD-AD fusions localized to hundreds of genomic sites but recruited Med15 and induced transcription in only a subset of bound promoters, characterized by a fuzzy-nucleosome architecture. Direct DBD-Med15 fusions shifted DBD localization towards fuzzy-nucleosome promoters, including promoters devoid of the endogenous Mediator. We propose that Med15, and perhaps other coactivators, possess inherent promoter preference and thus actively contribute to the selection of TF-induced genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Mindel
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Sagie Brodsky
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Hadas Yung
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Wajd Manadre
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Naama Barkai
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Natalino M, Fumasoni M. Compensatory Evolution to DNA Replication Stress is Robust to Nutrient Availability. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.10.29.620637. [PMID: 39553989 PMCID: PMC11565888 DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.29.620637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Evolutionary repair refers to the compensatory evolution that follows perturbations in cellular processes. While evolutionary trajectories are often reproducible, other studies suggest they are shaped by genotype-by-environment (GxE) interactions. Here, we test the predictability of evolutionary repair in response to DNA replication stress-a severe perturbation impairing the conserved mechanisms of DNA synthesis, resulting in genetic instability. We conducted high-throughput experimental evolution on Saccharomyces cerevisiae experiencing constitutive replication stress, grown under different glucose availabilities. We found that glucose levels impact the physiology and adaptation rate of replication stress mutants. However, the genetics of adaptation show remarkable robustness across environments. Recurrent mutations collectively recapitulated the fitness of evolved lines and are advantageous across macronutrient availability. We also identified a novel role of the mediator complex of RNA polymerase II in adaptation to replicative stress. Our results highlight the robustness and predictability of evolutionary repair mechanisms to DNA replication stress and provide new insights into the evolutionary aspects of genome stability, with potential implications for understanding cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Natalino
- Gulbenkian Institute for Molecular Medicine (GIMM), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marco Fumasoni
- Gulbenkian Institute for Molecular Medicine (GIMM), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chao TC, Chen SF, Kim HJ, Tang HC, Tseng HC, Xu A, Palao L, Khadka S, Li T, Huang MF, Lee DF, Murakami K, Boyer TG, Tsai KL. Structural basis of the human transcriptional Mediator regulated by its dissociable kinase module. Mol Cell 2024; 84:3932-3949.e10. [PMID: 39321804 PMCID: PMC11832219 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
The eukaryotic transcriptional Mediator comprises a large core (cMED) and a dissociable CDK8 kinase module (CKM). cMED recruits RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) and promotes pre-initiation complex formation in a manner repressed by the CKM through mechanisms presently unknown. Herein, we report cryoelectron microscopy structures of the complete human Mediator and its CKM. The CKM binds to multiple regions on cMED through both MED12 and MED13, including a large intrinsically disordered region (IDR) in the latter. MED12 and MED13 together anchor the CKM to the cMED hook, positioning CDK8 downstream and proximal to the transcription start site. Notably, the MED13 IDR obstructs the recruitment of RNA Pol II/MED26 onto cMED by direct occlusion of their respective binding sites, leading to functional repression of cMED-dependent transcription. Combined with biochemical and functional analyses, these structures provide a conserved mechanistic framework to explain the basis for CKM-mediated repression of cMED function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ti-Chun Chao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shin-Fu Chen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hee Jong Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hui-Chi Tang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hsiang-Ching Tseng
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - An Xu
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leon Palao
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Subash Khadka
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mo-Fan Huang
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dung-Fang Lee
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Precision Health, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine for the Prevention of Human Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kenji Murakami
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Thomas G Boyer
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Kuang-Lei Tsai
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li T, Chao TC, Tsai KL. Structures and compositional dynamics of Mediator in transcription regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 88:102892. [PMID: 39067114 PMCID: PMC11779508 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
The eukaryotic Mediator, comprising a large Core (cMED) and a dissociable CDK8 kinase module (CKM), functions as a critical coregulator during RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription. cMED recruits RNAPII and facilitates the assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) at promoters. In contrast, CKM prevents RNAPII binding to cMED while simultaneously exerting positive or negative influence on gene transcription through its kinase function. Recent structural studies on cMED and CKM have revealed their intricate architectures and subunit interactions. Here, we explore these structures, providing a comprehensive insight into Mediator (cMED-CKM) architecture and its potential mechanism in regulating RNAPII transcription. Additionally, we discuss the remaining puzzles that require further investigation to fully understand how cMED coordinates with CKM to regulate transcription in various events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston TX, USA
| | - Ti-Chun Chao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston TX, USA
| | - Kuang-Lei Tsai
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nemsick S, Hansen AS. Molecular models of bidirectional promoter regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 87:102865. [PMID: 38905929 PMCID: PMC11550790 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Approximately 11% of human genes are transcribed by a bidirectional promoter (BDP), defined as two genes with <1 kb between their transcription start sites. Despite their evolutionary conservation and enrichment for housekeeping genes and oncogenes, the regulatory role of BDPs remains unclear. BDPs have been suggested to facilitate gene coregulation and/or decrease expression noise. This review discusses these potential regulatory functions through the context of six prospective underlying mechanistic models: a single nucleosome free region, shared transcription factor/regulator binding, cooperative negative supercoiling, bimodal histone marks, joint activation by enhancer(s), and RNA-mediated recruitment of regulators. These molecular mechanisms may act independently and/or cooperatively to facilitate the coregulation and/or decreased expression noise predicted of BDPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Nemsick
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; The Gene Regulation Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Anders S Hansen
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; The Gene Regulation Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen SF, Chao TC, Kim HJ, Tang HC, Khadka S, Li T, Lee DF, Murakami K, Boyer TG, Tsai KL. Structural basis of the human transcriptional Mediator complex modulated by its dissociable Kinase module. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.07.01.601608. [PMID: 39005267 PMCID: PMC11244988 DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.01.601608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
The eukaryotic Mediator, comprising a large Core (cMED) and a dissociable CDK8 kinase module (CKM), regulates RNA Polymerase II (Pol II)-dependent transcription. cMED recruits Pol II and promotes pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation in a manner inhibited by the CKM, which is also implicated in post-initiation control of gene expression. Herein we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of the human complete Mediator and its CKM, which explains the basis for CKM inhibition of cMED-activated transcription. The CKM binds to cMED through an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) in MED13 and HEAT repeats in MED12. The CKM inhibits transcription by allocating its MED13 IDR to occlude binding of Pol II and MED26 to cMED and further obstructing cMED-PIC assembly through steric hindrance with TFIIH and the +1 nucleosome. Notably, MED12 binds to the cMED Hook, positioning CDK8 downstream of the transcription start site, which sheds new light on its stimulatory function in post-initiation events.
Collapse
|
9
|
Palao L, Murakami K, Chang YW. Combining per-particle cryo-ET and cryo-EM single particle analysis to elucidate heterogeneous DNA-protein organization. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 84:102765. [PMID: 38181688 PMCID: PMC10922635 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy single particle analysis (cryo-EM SPA) and cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) have historically been employed as distinct approaches for investigating molecular structures of disparate sample types, focusing on highly purified biological macromolecules and in situ cellular contexts, respectively. However, these techniques offer inherently complementary structural insights that, when combined, provide a more comprehensive understanding of complex biological systems. For example, if both techniques are applied to the same purified biological macromolecules, cryo-ET has the ability to resolve highly flexible yet strong signal features on an individual target molecule which will not be preserved in the high-resolution cryo-EM SPA results. In this review, we highlight recent achievements utilizing such applications to unveil new insights into the chromatin assembly and activities of DNA-protein assemblies. This convergence of cryo-EM SPA and cryo-ET holds great promise for elucidating new structural aspects of these essential molecular processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Palao
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Kenji Murakami
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; Institute of Structural Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Yi-Wei Chang
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; Institute of Structural Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Asarnow D, Becker VA, Bobe D, Dubbledam C, Johnston JD, Kopylov M, Lavoie NR, Li Q, Mattingly JM, Mendez JH, Paraan M, Turner J, Upadhye V, Walsh RM, Gupta M, Eng ET. Recent advances in infectious disease research using cryo-electron tomography. Front Mol Biosci 2024; 10:1296941. [PMID: 38288336 PMCID: PMC10822977 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1296941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
With the increasing spread of infectious diseases worldwide, there is an urgent need for novel strategies to combat them. Cryogenic sample electron microscopy (cryo-EM) techniques, particularly electron tomography (cryo-ET), have revolutionized the field of infectious disease research by enabling multiscale observation of biological structures in a near-native state. This review highlights the recent advances in infectious disease research using cryo-ET and discusses the potential of this structural biology technique to help discover mechanisms of infection in native environments and guiding in the right direction for future drug discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Asarnow
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Vada A. Becker
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Daija Bobe
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Charlie Dubbledam
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jake D. Johnston
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mykhailo Kopylov
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nathalie R. Lavoie
- Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Qiuye Li
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jacob M. Mattingly
- Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Joshua H. Mendez
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mohammadreza Paraan
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jack Turner
- European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Viraj Upadhye
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Richard M. Walsh
- Harvard Cryo-Electron Microscopy Center for Structural Biology and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Meghna Gupta
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Edward T. Eng
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Malik S, Roeder RG. Regulation of the RNA polymerase II pre-initiation complex by its associated coactivators. Nat Rev Genet 2023; 24:767-782. [PMID: 37532915 PMCID: PMC11088444 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-023-00630-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
The RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pre-initiation complex (PIC) is a critical node in eukaryotic transcription regulation, and its formation is the major rate-limiting step in transcriptional activation. Diverse cellular signals borne by transcriptional activators converge on this large, multiprotein assembly and are transduced via intermediary factors termed coactivators. Cryogenic electron microscopy, multi-omics and single-molecule approaches have recently offered unprecedented insights into both the structure and cellular functions of the PIC and two key PIC-associated coactivators, Mediator and TFIID. Here, we review advances in our understanding of how Mediator and TFIID interact with activators and affect PIC formation and function. We also discuss how their functions are influenced by their chromatin environment and selected cofactors. We consider how, through its multifarious interactions and functionalities, a Mediator-containing and TFIID-containing PIC can yield an integrated signal processing system with the flexibility to determine the unique temporal and spatial expression pattern of a given gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohail Malik
- Laboratory of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Robert G Roeder
- Laboratory of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jeon J, Friedman LJ, Seo HD, Adeleke A, Graham B, Patteson E, Gelles J, Buratowski S. Single-molecule analysis of transcription activation: dynamics of SAGA co-activator recruitment. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.07.552353. [PMID: 37609355 PMCID: PMC10441308 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.07.552353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Transcription activators are said to stimulate gene expression by "recruiting" coactivators to promoters, yet this term fits several different kinetic models. To directly analyze dynamics of activator-coactivator interactions, single-molecule microscopy was used to image promoter DNA, a transcription activator, and the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex within nuclear extract. SAGA readily, but transiently, binds nucleosome-free DNA without activator, while chromatin template association occurs nearly exclusively when activator is present. On both templates, activator increases SAGA association rates by up to an order of magnitude, and dramatically extends its dwell times. These effects reflect direct interactions with the transactivation domain, as VP16 or Rap1 activation domains produce different SAGA dynamics. Despite multiple bromodomains, acetyl-CoA or histone H3/H4 tail acetylation only modestly improves SAGA binding. Unexpectedly, histone acetylation more strongly affects activator residence. Our studies thus reveal two modes of SAGA interaction with the genome: a short-lived activator-independent interaction with nucleosome-free DNA, and a state tethered to promoter-bound transcription activators that can last up to several minutes.
Collapse
|
13
|
Rengachari S, Schilbach S, Cramer P. Mediator structure and function in transcription initiation. Biol Chem 2023; 404:829-837. [PMID: 37078249 DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2023-0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy have led to multiple structures of Mediator in complex with the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription initiation machinery. As a result we now hold in hands near-complete structures of both yeast and human Mediator complexes and have a better understanding of their interactions with the Pol II pre-initiation complex (PIC). Herein, we provide a summary of recent achievements and discuss their implications for future studies of Mediator and its role in gene regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivasan Rengachari
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sandra Schilbach
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Patrick Cramer
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kaplan CD. Mediator and Pol II go to eleven (CTD repeats). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2304596120. [PMID: 37094154 PMCID: PMC10160946 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2304596120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Craig D. Kaplan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA15260
| |
Collapse
|