Chromatin accessibility and epigenetic modifications differ between frequently and infrequently rearranging VH genes

Addressing Technical Pitfalls in Pursuit of Molecular Factors That Mediate Immunoglobulin Gene Regulation

The expressed Ab repertoire is a critical determinant of immune-related phenotypes. Ab-encoding transcripts are distinct from other expressed genes because they are transcribed from somatically rearranged gene segments. Human Abs are composed of two identical H and L chain polypeptides derived from genes in IGH locus and one of two L chain loci. The combinatorial diversity that results from Ab gene rearrangement and the pairing of different H and L chains contributes to the immense diversity of the baseline Ab repertoire. During rearrangement, Ab gene selection is mediated by factors that influence chromatin architecture, promoter/enhancer activity, and V(D)J recombination. Interindividual variation in the composition of the Ab repertoire associates with germline variation in IGH, implicating polymorphism in Ab gene regulation. Determining how IGH variants directly mediate gene regulation will require integration of these variants with other functional genomic datasets. In this study, we argue that standard approaches using short reads have limited utility for characterizing regulatory regions in IGH at haplotype resolution. Using simulated and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing reads, we define features of IGH that limit use of short reads and a single reference genome, namely 1) the highly duplicated nature of the DNA sequence in IGH and 2) structural polymorphisms that are frequent in the population. We demonstrate that personalized diploid references enhance performance of short-read data for characterizing mappable portions of the locus, while also showing that long-read profiling tools will ultimately be needed to fully resolve functional impacts of IGH germline variation on expressed Ab repertoires.

Genetic variation in the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus shapes the human antibody repertoire

Variation in the antibody response has been linked to differential outcomes in disease, and suboptimal vaccine and therapeutic responsiveness, the determinants of which have not been fully elucidated. Countering models that presume antibodies are generated largely by stochastic processes, we demonstrate that polymorphisms within the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IGH) impact the naive and antigen-experienced antibody repertoire, indicating that genetics predisposes individuals to mount qualitatively and quantitatively different antibody responses. We pair recently developed long-read genomic sequencing methods with antibody repertoire profiling to comprehensively resolve IGH genetic variation, including novel structural variants, single nucleotide variants, and genes and alleles. We show that IGH germline variants determine the presence and frequency of antibody genes in the expressed repertoire, including those enriched in functional elements linked to V(D)J recombination, and overlapping disease-associated variants. These results illuminate the power of leveraging IGH genetics to better understand the regulation, function, and dynamics of the antibody response in disease.

Epigenetic aspects of lymphocyte antigen receptor gene rearrangement or 'when stochasticity completes randomness'

To perform their specific functional role, B and T lymphocytes, cells of the adaptive immune system of jawed vertebrates, need to express one (and, preferably, only one) form of antigen receptor, i.e. the immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor (TCR), respectively. This end goal depends initially on a series of DNA cis-rearrangement events between randomly chosen units from separate clusters of V, D (at some immunoglobulin and TCR loci) and J gene segments, a biomolecular process collectively referred to as V(D)J recombination. V(D)J recombination takes place in immature T and B cells and relies on the so-called RAG nuclease, a site-specific DNA cleavage apparatus that corresponds to the lymphoid-specific moiety of the VDJ recombinase. At the genome level, this recombinase's mission presents substantial biochemical challenges. These relate to the huge distance between (some of) the gene segments that it eventually rearranges and the need to achieve cell-lineage-restricted and developmentally ordered routines with at times, mono-allelic versus bi-allelic discrimination. The entire process must be completed without any recombination errors, instigators of chromosome instability, translocation and, potentially, tumorigenesis. As expected, such a precisely choreographed and yet potentially risky process demands sophisticated controls; epigenetics demonstrates what is possible when calling upon its many facets. In this vignette, we will recall the evidence that almost from the start appeared to link the two topics, V(D)J recombination and epigenetics, before reviewing the latest advances in our knowledge of this joint venture.

Localized DNA demethylation at recombination intermediates during immunoglobulin heavy chain gene assembly

The dynamics of DNA methylation during the complex genomic rearrangement of antigen receptor genes in developing B lymphocytes reveal localized demethylation of the first recombination product that may serve as a mark necessary for the second step of rearrangement.

Multiple epigenetic marks have been proposed to contribute to the regulation of antigen receptor gene assembly via V(D)J recombination. Here we provide a comprehensive view of DNA methylation at the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene locus prior to and during V(D)J recombination. DNA methylation did not correlate with the histone modification state on unrearranged alleles, indicating that these epigenetic marks were regulated independently. Instead, pockets of tissue-specific demethylation were restricted to DNase I hypersensitive sites within this locus. Though unrearranged diversity (D_H) and joining (J_H) gene segments were methylated, DJ_H junctions created after the first recombination step were largely demethylated in pro-, pre-, and mature B cells. Junctional demethylation was highly localized, B-lineage-specific, and required an intact tissue-specific enhancer, Eμ. We propose that demethylation occurs after the first recombination step and may mark the junction for secondary recombination.

DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides is implicated in the regulation of gene expression in mammals. However, the regulation of DNA methylation itself is less clear despite recent advances in identifying enzymes that add or remove methyl groups. We have investigated the dynamics of DNA methylation during genome rearrangements that assemble antigen receptor genes in developing B lymphocytes to determine whether methylation status correlates with rearrangement potential. Two recombination events generate immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) genes. The first step brings together diversity (D_H) and joining (J_H) gene segments to produce DJ_H junctions. We show that both gene segments are methylated prior to rearrangement, whereas the DJ_H product is demethylated. DJ_H junctional demethylation is tissue-specific and requires an enhancer, Eμ, located within the IgH locus. The latter observations indicate that localized demethylation of the DJ_H junction occurs after the first recombination step and thus does not guide this first step of IgH gene assembly. Our working hypothesis is that recombination induces demethylation of recombinant product and may mark the junction for the second step of IgH rearrangement, juxtaposition of variable (V_H) gene segments to rearranged DJ_H products to produce fully recombined V(D)J alleles.

Determinants of public T cell responses

Historically, sharing T cell receptors (TCRs) between individuals has been speculated to be impossible, considering the dramatic discrepancy between the potential enormity of the TCR repertoire and the limited number of T cells generated in each individual. However, public T cell response, in which multiple individuals share identical TCRs in responding to a same antigenic epitope, has been extensively observed in a variety of immune responses across many species. Public T cell responses enable individuals within a population to generate similar antigen-specific TCRs against certain ubiquitous pathogens, leading to favorable biological outcomes. However, the relatively concentrated feature of TCR repertoire may limit T cell response in a population to some other pathogens. It could be a great benefit for human health if public T cell responses can be manipulated. Therefore, the mechanistic insight of public TCR generation is important to know. Recently, high-throughput DNA sequencing has revolutionized the study of immune receptor repertoires, which allows a much better understanding of the factors that determine the overlap of TCR repertoire among individuals. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on public T-cell response and discuss future challenges in this field.

DNA methylation and B-cell autoreactivity

Although not exclusive, mounting evidence supports the fact that DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides controls B-cell development and the progressive eliminati or inactivation of autoreactive B cell. Indeed, the expression of different B ce specific factors, including Pax5, rearrangement of the B-cell receptor (BCR) and cytokine production are tightly controlled by DNA methylation. Among normal B cells, the autoreactive CD5+ B cell sub-population presents a reduced capacity to methylate its DNA that leads to the expression of normally repressed genes, such as the human endogenous retrovirus (HERV). In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, the archetype ofautoimmune disease, autoreactive B cells are characterized by their inability to induce DNA methylation that prolongs their survival. Finally, treating B cells with demethylating drugs increased their autoreactivity. Altogether this suggests that a deeper comprehension ofDNA methylation in B cells may offer opportunities to develop new therapeutics to control autoreactive B cells.

Epigenetic and 3-dimensional regulation of V(D)J rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes

V(D)J recombination is a crucial component of the adaptive immune response, allowing for the production of a diverse antigen receptor repertoire (Ig and TCR). This review will focus on how epigenetic regulation and 3-dimensional (3D) interactions may control V(D)J recombination at Ig loci. The interplay between transcription factors and post-translational modifications at the Igh, Igκ, and Igλ loci will be highlighted. Furthermore, we propose that the spatial organization and epigenetic boundaries of each Ig loci before and during V(D)J recombination may be influenced in part by the CTCF/cohesin complex. Taken together, the many epigenetic and 3D layers of control ensure that Ig loci are only rearranged at appropriate stages of B cell development.

Genetic and epigenetic control of V gene rearrangement frequency

The antibody repertoire is enormous and reflects the power of combinatorial and junctional diversity to generate avast repertoire with a moderate number of V, D and J gene segments. However, although there are many VH and VK gene segments, the usage of these genes is highly unequal. In this chapter, we summarize our studies elucidating many of the factors that contribute to this unequal rearrangement frequency of individual gene segments. Firstly, there is much natural variation in the sequence of the Recombination Signal Sequences (RSS) that flank each recombining gene. This genetic variation contributes greatly to unequal recombination frequencies. However, other factors also play a major role in recombination frequencies, as evidenced by the fact that some genes with identical RSS rearrange at very different frequencies in vivo. Analysis of these gene segments by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) suggests that differences in the structure of the chromatin associated with each gene is also a major factor in differential accessibility for rearrangement. Finally, transcription factors can direct accessibility for recombination, possibly by recruiting chromatin-modifying enzymes to the vicinity of the gene segment. Together, these factors dictate the composition of the newly formed antibody repertoire.

Type 2 NF1 deletions are highly unusual by virtue of the absence of nonallelic homologous recombination hotspots and an apparent preference for female mitotic recombination

Approximately 5% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) exhibit gross deletions that encompass the NF1 gene and its flanking regions. The breakpoints of the common 1.4-Mb (type 1) deletions are located within low-copy repeats (NF1-REPs) and cluster within a 3.4-kb hotspot of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Here, we present the first comprehensive breakpoint analysis of type 2 deletions, which are a second type of recurring NF1 gene deletion. Type 2 deletions span 1.2 Mb and are characterized by breakpoints located within the SUZ12 gene and its pseudogene, which closely flank the NF1-REPs. Breakpoint analysis of 13 independent type 2 deletions did not reveal any obvious hotspots of NAHR. However, an overrepresentation of polypyrimidine/polypurine tracts and triplex-forming sequences was noted in the breakpoint regions that could have facilitated NAHR. Intriguingly, all 13 type 2 deletions identified so far are characterized by somatic mosaicism, which indicates a positional preference for mitotic NAHR within the NF1 gene region. Indeed, whereas interchromosomal meiotic NAHR occurs between the NF1-REPs giving rise to type 1 deletions, NAHR during mitosis appears to occur intrachromosomally between the SUZ12 gene and its pseudogene, thereby generating type 2 deletions. Such a clear distinction between the preferred sites of mitotic versus meiotic NAHR is unprecedented in any other genomic disorder induced by the local genomic architecture. Additionally, 12 of the 13 mosaic type 2 deletions were found in females. The marked female preponderance among mosaic type 2 deletions contrasts with the equal sex distribution noted for type 1 and/or atypical NF1 deletions. Although an influence of chromatin structure was strongly suspected, no sex-specific differences in the methylation pattern exhibited by the SUZ12 gene were apparent that could explain the higher rate of mitotic recombination in females.