Chemical control of receptor kinase signaling by rapamycin-induced dimerization

Deciphering the complex roles of leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) in plant signal transduction

Leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) are essential receptor protein kinases in plants that are the key to signal perception and responses and central to regulating plant growth, development, and defense. Despite extensive research on the LRR-RK family, gaps persist in our understanding of their ligand recognition and activation mechanisms, interactions with co-receptor, signal transduction pathways, and biochemical and molecular regulation. Researchers have made significant advances in understanding the critical roles of LRR-RKs in plant growth and development, signal transduction, and stress responses. Here, we first summarized the gene expression levels of LRR-RKs in plants. We then reviewed the conservation and evolutionary relationships of these genes across different species. We also investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the variations in LRR-RK signaling under different environmental conditions. Finally, we provide a comprehensive summary of how abiotic and biotic stresses modulate LRR-RK signaling pathways in plants.

The blue-light receptor CRY1 serves as a switch to balance photosynthesis and plant defense

Plant stomata open in response to blue light, allowing gas exchange and water transpiration. However, open stomata are potential entry points for pathogens. Whether plants can sense pathogens and mount defense responses upon stomatal opening and how blue-light cues are integrated to balance growth-defense trade-offs are poorly characterized. We show that the Arabidopsis blue-light photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME 1 (CRY1) mediates various aspects of immunity, including pathogen-triggered stomatal closure as well as activation of plant immunity through a typical light-responsive protein LATE UPREGULATED IN RESPONSE TO HYALOPERONOSPORA PARASITICA (LURP1). LURP1 undergoes N-terminal palmitoylation in the presence of bacterial flagellin, prompting a change in subcellular localization from the cytoplasm to plasma membrane, where it enhances the activity of the receptor FLAGELLIN SENSING 2 (FLS2) to mediate plant defense. Collectively, these findings reveal that blue light regulates stomatal defense and highlight the dual functions of CRY1 in photosynthesis and immunity.

SERKs serve as co-receptors for SYR1 to trigger systemin-mediated defense responses in tomato

Systemin, the first peptide hormone identified in plants, was initially isolated from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves. Systemin mediates local and systemic wound-induced defense responses in plants, conferring resistance to necrotrophic fungi and herbivorous insects. Systemin is recognized by the leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) receptor SYSTEMIN RECEPTOR1 (SYR1), but how the systemin recognition signal is transduced to intracellular signaling pathways to trigger defense responses is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that SERK family LRR-RLKs function as co-receptors for SYR1 to mediate systemin signal transduction in tomato. By using chemical genetic approaches coupled with engineered receptors, we revealed that the association of the cytoplasmic kinase domains of SYR1 with SERKs leads to their mutual trans-phosphorylation and the activation of SYR1, which in turn induces a wide range of defense responses. Systemin stimulates the association between SYR1 and all tomato SERKs (SlSERK1, SlSERK3A, and SlSERK3B). The resulting SYR1-SlSERK heteromeric complexes trigger the phosphorylation of TOMATO PROTEIN KINASE 1B (TPK1b), a receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase that positively regulates systemin responses. Additionally, upon association with SYR1, SlSERKs are cleaved by the Pseudomonas syringae effector HopB1, further supporting the finding that SlSERKs are activated by systemin-bound SYR1. Finally, genetic analysis using Slserk mutants showed that SlSERKs are essential for systemin-mediated defense responses. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the systemin-mediated association of SYR1 and SlSERKs activates defense responses against herbivorous insects.

Allosteric activation of the co-receptor BAK1 by the EFR receptor kinase initiates immune signaling

Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

Allosteric activation of the co-receptor BAK1 by the EFR receptor kinase initiates immune signaling

Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic (pseudo)kinase signaling mechanisms have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (ELONGATION FACTOR TU RECEPTOR) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1-ASSOCIATED KINASE 1/SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

The Human Mutation K237_V238del in a Putative Lipid Binding Motif within the V-ATPase a2 Isoform Suggests a Molecular Mechanism Underlying Cutis Laxa

Vacuolar ATPases (V-ATPases), proton pumps composed of 16 subunits, are necessary for a variety of cellular functions. Subunit "a" has four isoforms, a1-a4, each with a distinct cellular location. We identified a phosphoinositide (PIP) interaction motif, KXnK(R)IK(R), conserved in all four isoforms, and hypothesize that a/PIP interactions regulate V-ATPase recruitment/retention to different organelles. Among the four isoforms, a2 is enriched on Golgi with a2 mutations in the PIP motif resulting in cutis laxa. We hypothesize that the hydrophilic N-terminal (NT) domain of a2 contains a lipid-binding domain, and mutations in this domain prevent interaction with Golgi-enriched PIPs, resulting in cutis laxa. We recreated the cutis laxa-causing mutation K237_V238del, and a double mutation in the PIP-binding motif, K237A/V238A. Circular dichroism confirmed that there were no protein structure alterations. Pull-down assays with PIP-enriched liposomes revealed that wildtype a2NT preferentially binds phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI(4)P), while mutants decreased binding to PI(4)P. In HEK293 cells, wildtype a2NT was localized to Golgi and co-purified with microsomal membranes. Mutants reduced Golgi localization and membrane association. Rapamycin depletion of PI(4)P diminished a2NT-Golgi localization. We conclude that a2NT is sufficient for Golgi retention, suggesting the lipid-binding motif is involved in V-ATPase targeting and/or retention. Mutational analyses suggest a molecular mechanism underlying how a2 mutations result in cutis laxa.

SERKs and NIKs: Coreceptors or signaling hubs in a complex crosstalk between growth and defense?

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASES (SERKs) and NUCLEAR SHUTTLE PROTEIN-INTERACTING KINASES (NIKs) belong to superfamily II of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases, which share cytosolic kinase conservation and a similar ectodomain configuration. SERKs have been extensively demonstrated to function as coreceptors of receptor-like kinases, which sense biotic or developmental signals to initiate specific responses. NIKs, on the other hand, have emerged as downstream components in signaling cascades, not functioning as coreceptors but rather serving as hubs that converge information from both biotic and abiotic signals, resulting in a unified response. Like SERKs, NIKs play a crucial role as information spreaders in plant cells, forming hubs of high centrality. However, unlike SERKs, which function as coreceptors and assemble paired receptor-specific responses, NIKs employ a shared signaling circuit to transduce diverse biotic and abiotic signals into the same physiological response. Therefore, this review highlights the concept of signaling hubs that differ from coreceptors in signaling pathways.

Control of lateral root formation by rapamycin-induced dimerization of engineered RGI/BAK1 and by BIR3 chimera

Leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) play a pivotal role in diverse aspects of growth, development, and immunity in plants by sensing extracellular signals. Typically, LRR-RKs are activated through the ligand-induced interaction with a SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE (SERK) coreceptor, triggering downstream signaling. ROOT MERISTEM GROWTH FACTOR1 (RGF1) INSENSITIVEs (RGIs) LRR-RLK receptors promote primary root meristem activity while inhibiting lateral root (LR) development in response to RGF peptide. In this study, we employed rapamycin-induced dimerization (RiD) and BAK1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE3 (BIR3) chimera approaches to explore the gain-of-function of RGI1, RGI4, and RGI5. Rapamycin induced the association of cytosolic kinase domains (CKDs) of RGI1 and the BAK1 coreceptor, activating both mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MPK3) and MPK6. Rapamycin significantly inhibited LR formation in RiD-RGI1/RGI4/RGI5-BAK1 plants. Using transgenic Arabidopsis expressing RGI1CKD fused to the BIR3-LRR chimera under estradiol control, we observed a substantial reduction in LR density upon β-estradiol treatment. Additionally, we identified a decrease in root gravitropism in BIR3 chimera plants. In contrast, RiD-RGI/BAK1 plants did not exhibit defects in root gravitropism, implying the importance of combinatorial interactions between RGIs and SERK coreceptors in the inhibition of root gravitropism. Constitutive activation of RGIs with BAK1 in RiD-RGI/BAK1 plants by rapamycin treatment resulted in the inhibition of primary root growth, resembling the inhibitory effects observed with high concentrations of phytohormones on primary root elongation. Our findings highlight that the interactions between CKDs of RGIs and BAK1, constitutively induced by rapamycin or BIR3 chimera, efficiently control LR development.

PSY-PSYR peptide-receptor pairs control the trade-off between plant growth and stress response

Leucine-rich repeat-receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) perceive various endogenous peptide hormones that control plant growth and development. However, the majority of corresponding ligands and their direct ligand-binding receptors have not been identified yet. A recent study demonstrated that three LRR-RK PLANT PEPTIDE CONTAINING SULFATED TYROSINE RECEPTORS (PSYRs) act as ligand-receptors of the PSY family peptides that mediate the trade-off between the optimal plant growth and stress tolerance responses. The genetic, biochemical, and transcriptome analyses suggested that PSYR1, PSYR2, and PSYR3 function as negative regulators of plant growth in the absence of PSY peptides and induce stress tolerance responses, whereas the PSY family peptides repress PSYR signaling, allowing plant growth. This trade-off mechanism between plant growth and stress responses mediated by the PSY-PSYR signaling module allows plants to survive under ever changing environmental stresses.

The receptor-like kinase EMS1 and BRI1 coordinately regulate stamen elongation via the transcription factors BES1/BZR1 in Arabidopsis

Plants possess a large family of receptor kinase proteins to mediate cell-to-cell and cell-to-environment communication, and these regulations are essential for plant growth and development as well as resistance to biotic or abiotic stresses. EMS1 is a receptor kinase which involved in tapetum cell fate determination during anther development, while brassinosteroid (BR) receptor, BRI1, controls most aspects of plant growth and development. Although EMS1 and BRI1 are known to regulate independent biological processes, they interact with identical components of the downstream signaling pathways. However, the biological processes other than the tapetum development controlled by the EMS1 signal are not clear. Here, we report that EMS1 signaling-related mutants exhibited an insufficient stamen elongation phenotype, similar to BR signaling mutants. Transgenic expression of BRI1 restored the short filament phenotype of ems1. Conversely, co-expression of EMS1 and TPD1 also restored the short filaments of BRI1 mutants, bri1. Genetic experiments confirmed that EMS1 and BRI1 regulate filament elongation through their downstream transcription factors BES1/BZR1. Molecular analysis suggested that the decrease in BR signaling output in filaments of the ems1 mutant caused deficient filament development. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments proved BES1 interacts with filament-specific transcription factor MYB21. Together, we found that the two receptor-like kinases (RLKs) EMS1 and BRI1 are cooperatively involved in the regulation of filament elongation via the transcription factors BES1/BZR1. These results indicated that the biological processes regulated by EMS1 and BRI1 in plants are both independent and interactive, which provides us with insights into multidimensional molecular control of the RLK pathway.

ZTL regulates thermomorphogenesis through TOC1 and PRR5

Plants adapt to high temperature stresses through thermomorphogenesis, a process that includes stem elongation and hyponastic leaf growth. Thermomorphogenesis is gated by the circadian clock through two evening-expressed clock components, TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1) and PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS5 (PRR5). These proteins directly interact with and inhibit PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4), a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that promotes thermoresponsive growth. PIF4-mediated thermoresponsive growth is positively regulated by ZEITLUPE (ZTL), a central clock component, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this are poorly understood. Here, we show that ZTL regulates thermoresponsive growth through TOC1 and PRR5. Genetic analyses reveal that ZTL regulates PIF4 activity as well as PIF4 expression. In Arabidopsis thaliana, ztl mutants exhibit highly accumulated TOC1 and PRR5 and unresponsive expression of PIF4 target genes under exposure to high temperatures. Mutations in TOC1 and PRR5 restore thermoactivation of PIF4 target genes and thermoresponsive growth in ztl mutants. We also show that the molecular chaperone heat-shock protein 90 promotes thermoresponsive growth through the ZTL-TOC1/PRR5 signaling module. Further, we show that ZTL protein stability is increased at high temperatures. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ZTL-mediated degradation of TOC1 and PRR5 enhances the sensitivity of hypocotyl growth to high temperatures.

Nanobody-driven signaling reveals the core receptor complex in root nodule symbiosis

Understanding the composition and activation of multicomponent receptor complexes is a challenge in biology. To address this, we developed a synthetic approach based on nanobodies to drive assembly and activation of cell surface receptors and apply the concept by manipulating receptors that govern plant symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing bacteria. We show that the Lotus japonicus Nod factor receptors NFR1 and NFR5 constitute the core receptor complex initiating the cortical root nodule organogenesis program as well as the epidermal program controlling infection. We find that organogenesis signaling is mediated by the intracellular kinase domains whereas infection requires functional ectodomains. Finally, we identify evolutionarily distant barley receptors that activate root nodule organogenesis, which could enable engineering of biological nitrogen-fixation into cereals.

Application of GeneCloudOmics: Transcriptomic Data Analytics for Synthetic Biology

Research in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering require a deep understanding on the function and regulation of complex pathway genes. This can be achieved through gene expression profiling which quantifies the transcriptome-wide expression under any condition, such as a cell development stage, mutant, disease, or treatment with a drug. The expression profiling is usually done using high-throughput techniques such as RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) or microarray. Although both methods are based on different technical approaches, they provide quantitative measures of the expression levels of thousands of genes. The expression levels of the genes are compared under different conditions to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the genes with different expression levels under different conditions. DEGs, usually involving thousands in number, are then investigated using bioinformatics and data analytic tools to infer and compare their functional roles between conditions. Dealing with such large datasets, therefore, requires intensive data processing and analyses to ensure its quality and produce results that are statistically sound. Thus, there is a need for deep statistical and bioinformatics knowledge to deal with high-throughput gene expression data. This represents a barrier for wet biologists with limited computational, programming, and data analytic skills that prevent them from getting the full potential of the data. In this chapter, we present a step-by-step protocol to perform transcriptome analysis using GeneCloudOmics, a cloud-based web server that provides an end-to-end platform for high-throughput gene expression analysis.

Pan-brassinosteroid signaling revealed by functional analysis of NILR1 in land plants

Brassinosteroid (BR) signaling has been identified from the ligand BRs sensed by the receptor Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1 (BRI1) to the final activation of Brassinozole Resistant 1/bri1 EMS-Suppressor 1 through a series of transduction events. Extensive studies have been conducted to characterize the role of BR signaling in various biological processes. Our previous study has shown that Excess Microsporocytes 1 (EMS1) and BRI1 control different aspects of plant growth and development via conserved intracellular signaling. Here, we reveal that another receptor, NILR1, can complement the bri1 mutant in the absence of BRs, indicating a pathway that resembles BR signaling activated by NILR1. Genetic analysis confirms the intracellular domains of NILR1, BRI1 and EMS1 have a common signal output. Furthermore, we demonstrate that NILR1 and BRI1 share the coreceptor BRI1 Associated Kinase 1 and substrate BSKs. Notably, the NILR1-mediated downstream pathway is conserved across land plants. In summary, we provide evidence for the signaling cascade of NILR1, suggesting pan-brassinosteroid signaling initiated by a group of distant receptor-ligand pairs in land plants.

Engineering Chimeras by Fusing Plant Receptor-like Kinase EMS1 and BRI1 Reveals the Two Receptors' Structural Specificity and Molecular Mechanisms

Brassinosteriods (BRs) are plant hormones essential for plant growth and development. The receptor-like kinase (RLK) BRI1 perceives BRs to initiate a well-known transduction pathway which finally activate the transcription factors BZR1/BES1 specifically regulating BR-mediated gene expression. The RLK EMS1 governs tapetum formation via the same signaling pathway shared with BRI1. BRI1 and EMS1 have a common signal output, but the gene structural specificity and the molecular response remain unclear. In this study, we identified that the transmembrane (TM), intracellular juxtamembrane (iJM), kinase, and leucin-rich repeats 1-13 (LRR1-13) domains of EMS1 could replace the corresponding BRI1 domain to maintain the BR receptor function, whereas the extracellular juxtamembrane (eJM) and LRR1-14 domains could not, indicating that the LRR14-EJM domain conferred functional specificity to BRI1. We compared the kinase domains of EMS1 and BRI1, and found that EMS1’s kinase activity was weaker than BRI1’s. Further investigation of the specific phosphorylation sites in BRI1 and EMS1 revealed that the Y1052 site in the kinase domain was essential for the BRI1 biological function, but the corresponding site in EMS1 showed no effect on the biological function of EMS1, suggesting a site regulation difference in the two receptors. Furthermore, we showed that EMS1 shared the substrate BSKs with BRI1. Our study provides insight into the structural specificity and molecular mechanism of BRI1 and EMS1, as well as the origin and divergence of BR receptors.