Long-term impact of interferon or Glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG) is undergoing a profound change, with new treatments being tested. These include complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized and placebo-controlled trials of innovative therapies in MG with available efficacy data.

METHODS

We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Cochrane Q test and I2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 26 weeks of eculizumab and ravulizumab, 28 days of efgartigimod, 43 days of rozanolixizumab, 12 weeks of zilucoplan, and 16, 24 or 52 weeks of rituximab treatment.

RESULTS

We observed an overall mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) score change of -2.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67, -1.67; p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. No significant difference emerged between complement inhibitors and anti-FcRn treatment (p = 0.16). The change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale (QMG) score was -3.46 (95% CI -4.53, -2.39; p < 0.001), with a higher reduction with FcRns (-4.78 vs. -2.60; p < 0.001). Rituximab did not significantly improve the MG-ADL (-0.92 [95% CI -2.24, 0.39]; p = 0.17) or QMG scores (-1.9 [95% CI -3.97, 0.18]; p = 0.07). In the network meta-analysis, efgartigimod had the highest probability of being the best treatment, followed by rozanolixizumab.

CONCLUSION

Anti-complement and FcRn treatments both proved to be effective in MG patients, whereas rituximab did not show a significant benefit for patients. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, including efficacy time points, FcRn treatments showed a greater effect on QMG score in the short term. Real-life studies with long-term measurements are needed to confirm our results.

Drug-induced liver injury by glatiramer acetate leading to liver transplant: A case report

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a widely used immune-modulating drug in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Although a few cases of drug-induced liver injury during GA therapy have been reported earlier, herein we present the case of a 43-year-old woman with relapsing MS who experienced acute liver failure after GA therapy, ultimately leading to liver transplant.

[Clinical factors and response to therapy with disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis: the experience of the Tomsk region]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate a disease-modifying drugs (DMD) response in multiple sclerosis (MS) in the Tomsk region population and detect clinical factors associated with the treatment response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 5-year prospective clinical study included 363 MS patients of the Tomsk region taking DMDs of the «first-line» and «second-line treatments». The response to DMDs therapy and the impact of MS clinical characteristics on response to treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

Clinical factors associated with resistance to DMD are male gender, partial reduce of the MS onset symptoms, short period of the first remission, severe neurological impairment, high relapse rate and disease progression rate.

CONCLUSION

Clinical features of MS are crucial factors associated with DMD response and should be used to prescribe DMD. This factor assessment can improve efficacy of the personalized MS treatment.

Relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab: A comparative study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical and radiological effectiveness of ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in a clinical practice setting and describe its tolerability and adverse events.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted comparing clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of all patients with (pw)PPMS and RRMS who had received treatment with ocrelizumab at least one cycle and have been followed up for one year at minimum.

RESULTS

42 patients (27 women) treated with ocrelizumab: 29 had RRMS and 13 PPMS. The follow-up period was 26.4 ± 8.4 months. The proportion of pwRRMS with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in the first year was 69.2% and in the second was 80%. In the first year, radiological activity was reduced by 80.0% in pwRRMS and 91.7% in pwPPMS. In the second year, radiological activity was completely reduced in both groups. A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was observed between the pre-ocrelizumab rate of disability progression vs. the first year rate of progression for pwRRMS and pwPPMS. However, an increase in the disability progression rate in the second year of treatment was found in pwPPMS. Ocrelizumab was mostly well tolerated and some adverse effects were reported: infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were the most frequent adverse event, followed by infections and hematological side effects. Discontinuations were due to infections, hematological complications, and perception of ineffectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocrelizumab was very effective in reducing relapses and MRI activity. The rate of progression was slowed down; however, the effect was more evident for pwRRMS than for pwPPMS over time.

Effectiveness of first generation disease-modifying therapy to prevent conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been associated with reduced relapse rates and accumulation of disability. However, studies examining impact of DMT on risk of transition to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) leveraging population-based nationwide data are still rare. Here, we determine the population incidence of conversion to SPMS using two consecutive nation-wide cohorts, one immediately before and one after the introduction of DMT in Sweden.

METHODS

We included two consecutive population cohorts of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) from the Swedish national MS register for the periods 1975-1994 (n = 2161), before DMT availability, and 1995-2011 (n = 3510), in which DMTs, mainly first generation DMT (injectables), became available and eventually were used by 70% of patients. We explored the risk of transition to SPMS as a calendar year function encompassing the two cohorts. In addition, we determined the incidence of transition to SPMS through age strata below and above 50 years in untreated and treated patient subgroups.

RESULTS

The risk of conversion to SPMS (adjusted for current age, current time since onset, calendar year and sex) was significantly lower in the second compared with the first population cohort (hazard ratio 0.58; CI 0.48, 0.70). The risk of SPMS conversion per calendar year decreased by 2.6% annually (p < 0.001) after 1995. The risk of SPMS conversion increased with age until age 50. Thereafter, it was unchanged or decreased among those with early MS onset age (<35 years), but continued to increase with onset at higher age, with similar trends in treated and untreated subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of SPMS conversion significantly decreased at the population level after introduction of first generation DMTs by 1995. DMT efficiency was confirmed by a downward turn of the annual trajectory of the risk of SPMS conversion after 1995. An onset age determined pattern of variable SPMS incidence in higher age appeared in both treated and untreated strata. While first generation DMT delayed conversion to SPMS, their long-term effect was only moderate.

Astrocytic SARM1 promotes neuroinflammation and axonal demyelination in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through inhibiting GDNF signaling

Astrocytes are important components of the innate immune response in the central nervous system (CNS), involving in the inflammatory and neurotoxic responses that occur in CNS diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Recent studies have shown that SARM1 plays a critical role in axonal degeneration and inflammation. However, the detailed role of astrocytic SARM1 in MS remains unclear. Here, we established the MS model of mice - experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and found that SARM1 was upregulated in astrocytes of the spinal cords of EAE mice. Moreover, conditional knockout of astrocytic SARM1 (SARM1GFAP-CKO mice, SARM1Aldh1L1-CKO mice) delayed EAE with later onset, alleviated the inflammatory infiltration, and inhibited the demyelination and neuronal death. Mechanically, RNA-seq revealed that the expression of glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) was upregulated in SARM1-/- astrocytes. Western blot and immunostaining further confirmed the upregulation of GDNF in spinal cord astrocytes of SARM1GFAP-CKO EAE mice. Interestingly, the downregulation of GDNF by streptozotocin (STZ, a drug used to downregulate GDNF) treatment worsened the deficits of SARM1GFAP-CKO EAE mice. These findings identify that astrocytic SARM1 promotes neuroinflammation and axonal demyelination in EAE by inhibiting the expression of GDNF, reveal the novel role of SARM1/GDNF signaling in EAE, and provide new therapeutic ideas for the treatment of MS.

Escalation vs. Early Intense Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis

The treatment strategy of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly controversial debate. Currently, there are up to 19 drugs approved. However, there is no clear evidence to guide fundamental decisions such as what treatment should be chosen in first place, when treatment failure or suboptimal response should be considered, or what treatment should be considered in these cases. The “escalation strategy” consists of starting treatment with drugs of low side-effect profile and low efficacy, and “escalating” to drugs of higher efficacy—with more potential side-effects—if necessary. This strategy has prevailed over the years. However, the evidence supporting this strategy is based on short-term studies, in hope that the benefits will stand in the long term. These studies usually do not consider the heterogeneity of the disease and the limited effect that relapses have on the long-term. On the other hand, “early intense therapy” strategy refers to starting treatment with drugs of higher efficacy from the beginning, despite having a less favorable side-effect profile. This approach takes advantage of the so-called “window of opportunity” in hope to maximize the clinical benefits in the long-term. At present, the debate remains open. In this review, we will critically review both strategies. We provide a summary of the current evidence for each strategy without aiming to reach a definite conclusion.

Clinical predictors of disease progression in a cohort of Tunisian progressive Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is mainly based on Caucasian studies. In our North-African context, MS exhibits particular characteristics that are mainly related to a more severe phenotype. Given the limited data available, there is an imminent need to characterize progressive MS in our latitudes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the specificities of progressive MS and identify the inherent clinical predictors of disability accrual with a Tunisian cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective, hospital-based study was conducted in the department of neurology of Razi hospital. Patients, who had been diagnosed with MS, were divided into relapsing MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS). Epidemiological, clinical and paraclinical data were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Of the 504 patients, a progressive MS was described among 115 patients. This percentage of (22.8%) is divided into 13.9% SPMS and 8.9% PPMS. During the first clinical attack, motor symptoms have revealed to be predominant during PPMS (91.1%). For SPMS onset, the median time was 10 years, and was significantly delayed for patients with visual onset or full recovery from the first relapse. Patients with progressive MS exhibited a more rapid disability accumulation.

CONCLUSION

Compared to Caucasians, Tunisians exhibited a faster rate of conversion to SPMS. According to our natural progressive MS history, early clinical features are predictors of MS disability accrual.

[Treatment of multiple sclerosis with glatiramer acetate: a new look]

In recent years, the use of a new dosage (40 mg) of glatiramer acetate (GA), which is administered 3 times weekly has become widespread. In Russia, the drug Timexon (produced by the company BIOCAD) was developed and passed successful clinical trials. The final efficacy analysis included 150 patients treated for 12 months. The convenience of using a double dose of GA in 40 mg, which is registered on the territory of the Russian Federation by two manufacturing companies: CJSC BIOCAD and Teva Pharmaceutical Enterprises Ltd., has been proven.

The effect of national disease-modifying therapy subsidy policy on long-term disability outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are used to treat people with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis (ROMS), but our knowledge is largely limited to their short-term effects.

OBJECTIVE

To determine (1) the impact of national-level DMT subsidy policy on DMT use and health outcomes in people with MS (PwMS) and (2) the long-term effects of DMT on disability and quality of life (QoL; 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) utility value).

METHODS

This observational cohort study compared Australian and New Zealand populations with different levels of DMT availability 10-20 years post-ROMS diagnosis. Between-country differences were assessed using standardised differences. Associations were assessed with multivariable linear regression models.

RESULTS

We recruited 328 Australians and 256 New Zealanders. The Australian cohort had longer DMT treatment duration, greater proportion of disease course treated and shorter duration between diagnosis and starting DMT. The Australian cohort had lower median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (3.5 vs 4.0) and Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) (3.05 vs 3.71) and higher QoL (0.71 vs 0.65). In multivariable models, between-country differences in disability and QoL were largely attributed to differential use of DMT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the impact of national-level DMT policy on disability outcomes in PwMS. Where DMTs are more accessible, PwMS experienced less disability progression and improved QoL 10-20 years post-diagnosis.

Long-term effect of first-line injectable multiple sclerosis treatments: Input of a time-dependent propensity score

PURPOSE

The long-term effect of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate on multiple sclerosis (MS) disability progression has resulted in controversial results, probably due to a lack of appropriate control of biases as raised in observational studies. In particular, the time of the therapeutic decision is difficult to define when the controls are not treated.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was based on a series of patients from the MS expert center in Rennes, France. We used a time-dependent propensity score defined as the linear predictor of a Cox model estimating the hazard of being treated at each time from MS onset. The matching procedure resulted in two groups: patients matched as treated and as not yet treated. The restricted mean times (RMST) to reach a moderate level of disability or worsening of the disability were compared between the two groups in an intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 2383 patients included in the study, 556 were matched as treated. The matching procedure provided a good balance of both the time-fixed and the time-dependent covariates. A slight difference was observed for the time to reach a moderate level of disability, in favor of the "not yet treated" group (difference in the RMST: -0.62 [-0.91; -0.33]) while no difference was found in terms of worsening of the disability (-0.03 [-0.24; 0.33]).

CONCLUSION

This unexpected result is probably due to unmeasured confounders. However, this time-dependent PS warrants consideration in long-term effectiveness studies.

Promises and Limitations of Neural Stem Cell Therapies for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple disease-modifying medications with regulatory approval to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) are unable to prevent inflammatory tissue damage in the central nervous system (CNS), and none directly promote repair. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for therapies that can arrest and reverse the persistent accumulation of disabilities associated with progressive forms of MS (P-MS). Preclinical research has revealed an unexpected ability of neural stem cell (NSC) therapies to provide neurotrophic support and inhibit detrimental host immune responses in vivo following transplantation into the chronically inflamed CNS. We discuss NSC transplantation as a promising therapy for P-MS, elaborate on the necessities of clinical trial validation and formalized usage guidelines, and caution about unscrupulous 'clinics' marketing unproven therapies to patients.

Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Comment

Very recent data from cohorts, such as that of the French Observatory of Multiple Sclerosis (OFSEP) and the MSBase cohort, are the subject of new statistical analyses using propensity scores that enable the matching of relapses frequency, EDSS, age, and sex ratio in patient populations for comparisons with each other, which reduces selection biases. The first data from these cohorts revealed a decline in transition to secondary progressive MS with the most effective disease-modifying drugs currently available, especially when these drugs were used early in the disease. However, these studies remain limited regarding the number of patients, the duration of follow-up, the use of imperfect methodologies, and the level of evidence remains low. The Gothenburg cohort in Sweden, which has been followed since the 1950s, found that 14% of benign non-progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) never evolved to secondary progression after more than 45 years of evolution. EDSS 7 was reached after 48 years of disease (median), and 50% evolved to secondary progressive MS after 15 years (consistent with data from the historic London, Ontario cohort). These data demonstrate that most people living with MS evolve without treatment to a significant long-term disability and that this evolution is closely linked to secondary progression (more than the relapse frequency). Benign forms appear as MS that never passes into secondary progressive MS. Recent data demonstrate that the delay until transition to secondary progression (more than 30 years in the MSBase cohort) and the delay in reaching EDSS 6 decreased since the introduction of disease-modifying drugs 20 years ago. However, randomized placebo-controlled trials do not last more than 2 or 3 years, and many biases may be involved in long-term follow-up studies: worsening patients who are lost to follow-up ("informative censoring" bias: only good responders to treatment remain primarily under the same long-term treatment and are followed); changes in the populations in the most recent studies with a lower rate of relapse and lower progression of disability at the beginning of the disease prior to initiating treatments; and environmental changes that remain largely misunderstood and may contribute to a natural evolution towards less severe disease.

Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes

During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3-5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years.

Multiple sclerosis: effect of beta interferon treatment on survival

Worldwide, the beta interferons remain the most commonly prescribed disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis. However, it is unclear if they alter survival. We investigated the association between beta interferon and mortality in the 'real-world' setting. This was a multi-centre population-based observational study of patients with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis who were initially registered at a clinic in British Columbia, Canada (1980-2004) or Rennes, France (1976-2013). Data on this cohort were accessed from the clinical multiple sclerosis databases and from individually linked health administrative data; all data were collected prospectively. Participants were followed from the latter of their first multiple sclerosis clinic visit, 18th birthday or 1 January 1996; until death, emigration or 31 December 2013. Only those who were naïve to disease-modifying therapy and immunosuppressant treatment of multiple sclerosis at the start of their follow-up were included in the analysis. A nested case-control approach was used. Up to 20 controls, matched to cases (deaths) by country, sex, age ± 5 years, year and disability level at study entry, were randomly selected from the cohort by incidence density sampling. The associations between all-cause mortality and at least 6 months beta interferon exposure, and also cumulative exposure ('low', 6 months to 3 years; and 'high', >3 years), were estimated by conditional logistic regression adjusting for treatment with other disease-modifying therapies and age in years. Further analyses included separate analyses by sex and country, additional adjustment for comorbidity burden in the Canadian cohort, and estimation of the association between beta interferon and multiple sclerosis-related death in both countries. Among 5989 participants (75% female) with a mean age of 42 (standard deviation, SD 11) years at study entry, there were 742 deaths (70% female) and the mean age at death was 61 (SD 13) years. Of these cases, 649 were matched to between one and 20 controls. Results of the conditional logistic regression analyses are expressed as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The odds of beta interferon exposure were 32% lower among cases than controls (0.68; 0.53-0.89). Increased survival was associated with >3 years beta interferon exposure (0.44; 0.30-0.66), but not between 6 months and 3 years exposure (1.00; 0.73-1.38). Findings were similar within sex and country, and for multiple sclerosis-related death. Beta interferon treatment was associated with a lower mortality risk among people with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis. Findings were consistent between two geographically distinct regions in North America and Europe.

The effectiveness of interferon beta versus glatiramer acetate and natalizumab versus fingolimod in a Polish real-world population

Objective

The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated in MS centres in Poland.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data of all Polish RRMS patients receiving DMTs were prospectively collected from 2014 to 2018 in electronic files using the Therapeutic Program Monitoring System (SMPT).

Results

The study included 10,764 RRMS patients treated with DMTs in first-line and 1,042 in second-line programmes. IFNβ more effectively lengthened the times to the first relapse, disability progression, and brain MRI activity than GA. After 2 and 4 years of follow-up, more patients on IFNβ showed no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) in comparison to GA (66.3% and 44.3% vs 55.2% and 33.2%, respectively; p<0.001). NAT more effectively reduced brain MRI activity than FTY (p = 0.001). More patients under NAT had NEDA-3 after 2 and 4 years of follow-up compared to FTY (66.2% and 42.1% vs 52.1% and 29.5%, respectively; p = 0.03). In adjusted analysis, a higher baseline Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) was a predictor of relapse (p<0.001) and NEDA-3 failure (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

IFNβ compared to GA and NAT compared to FTY more effectively reduced disease activity in a Polish population of RRMS patients.

Retrospectively acquired cohort study to evaluate the long-term impact of two different treatment strategies on disability outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RE.LO.DI.MS): data from the Italian MS Register

BACKGROUND

The increase in disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) allows individualization of treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS); however, the long-term impact of different treatment sequences is not well established. This is particularly relevant for MS patients who may need to postpone more aggressive DMD strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate different therapeutic strategies and their long-term outcomes, measured as relapses and confirmed disability progression (CDP), in MS 'real-world' settings.

METHODS

Multicentre, observational, retrospectively acquired cohort study evaluating the long-term impact of different treatment strategies on disability outcomes in patients with RMS in the Italian MS Register.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1152 RMS-naïve patients after propensity-score adjustment. Patients included were receiving: interferon beta-1a (IFN-β1a) 44 µg switching to fingolimod (FTY; IFN-switchers; n = 97); FTY only (FTY-stayers; n = 157); IFN-β1a only (IFN-stayers; n = 849). CDP and relapses did not differ between FTY-stayers and IFN-switchers [HR (95% CI) 0.99 (0.48-2.04), p = 0.98 and 0.81 (0.42-1.58), p = 0.55, respectively]. However, IFN-stayers showed increased risk of relapses compared with FTY-stayers [HR (95% CI) 1.46 (1.00-2.12), p = 0.05].

CONCLUSION

The ideal treatment option for MS is becoming increasingly complex, with the need to balance benefit and risks. Our results suggest that starting with FTY affects the long-term disease outcome similarly to escalating from IFN-β1a to FTY.

The long-term effects of disease modifying therapies on disability in people living with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Disease modifying therapies (DMT) are a common medication class for treating people living with MS. However, although treatment with DMT can extend over more than a decade, little is known about their long-term effects. Here, we systematically review long-term (≥4 years) studies on the effect of DMT on disability progression and relapse in people living with MS.

METHODS

We searched the EMBASE and Medline databases in January 2018, using search terms that included DMT and relevant outcome measures. Two authors screened all resulting studies and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies using the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Where there was sufficient data, we performed meta-analyses using RevMan 5. Studies that could not be included in a meta-analysis were included in data synthesis.

RESULTS

Our search returned 7,766 unique articles for review. After screening, 18 articles were included. Follow-up in these studies ranged from a mean of 3.9 years to a median of 17.8 years. Fifteen (83.3%) of the included studies had a moderate risk of bias and three (16.7%) had a serious risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that DMT significantly reduced the risk of EDSS 6.0 and SPMS compared to no treatment.

CONCLUSION

There is some evidence that long-term treatment with interferon beta reduces the risk of EDSS 6.0 and SPMS compared to no treatment or placebo. More work is needed on the effect of second generation DMT and the relative effect of DMT on health outcomes.

Risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal study

Background:

The risk factors for conversion from relapsing-remitting to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis remain highly contested.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to determine the demographic, clinical and paraclinical features that influence the risk of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Methods:

Patients with adult-onset relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis and at least four recorded disability scores were selected from MSBase, a global observational cohort. The risk of conversion to objectively defined secondary progressive multiple sclerosis was evaluated at multiple time points per patient using multivariable marginal Cox regression models. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results:

A total of 15,717 patients were included in the primary analysis. Older age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02, p < 0.001), longer disease duration (HR = 1.01, p = 0.038), a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score (HR = 1.30, p < 0.001), more rapid disability trajectory (HR = 2.82, p < 0.001) and greater number of relapses in the previous year (HR = 1.07, p = 0.010) were independently associated with an increased risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Improving disability (HR = 0.62, p = 0.039) and disease-modifying therapy exposure (HR = 0.71, p = 0.007) were associated with a lower risk. Recent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging activity, evidence of spinal cord lesions and oligoclonal bands in the cerebrospinal fluid were not associated with the risk of conversion.

Conclusion:

Risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis increases with age, duration of illness and worsening disability and decreases with improving disability. Therapy may delay the onset of secondary progression.

Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

IMPORTANCE

Within 2 decades of onset, 80% of untreated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) convert to a phase of irreversible disability accrual termed secondary progressive MS. The association between disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), and this conversion has rarely been studied and never using a validated definition.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between the use, the type of, and the timing of DMTs with the risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS diagnosed with a validated definition.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Cohort study with prospective data from 68 neurology centers in 21 countries examining patients with relapsing-remitting MS commencing DMTs (or clinical monitoring) between 1988-2012 with minimum 4 years' follow-up.

EXPOSURES

The use, type, and timing of the following DMTs: interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, natalizumab, or alemtuzumab. After propensity-score matching, 1555 patients were included (last follow-up, February 14, 2017).

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Conversion to objectively defined secondary progressive MS.

RESULTS

Of the 1555 patients, 1123 were female (mean baseline age, 35 years [SD, 10]). Patients initially treated with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta had a lower hazard of conversion to secondary progressive MS than matched untreated patients (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81; P < .001; 5-year absolute risk, 12% [49 of 407] vs 27% [58 of 213]; median follow-up, 7.6 years [IQR, 5.8-9.6]), as did fingolimod (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62; P < .001; 5-year absolute risk, 7% [6 of 85] vs 32% [56 of 174]; median follow-up, 4.5 years [IQR, 4.3-5.1]); natalizumab (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86; P = .005; 5-year absolute risk, 19% [16 of 82] vs 38% [62 of 164]; median follow-up, 4.9 years [IQR, 4.4-5.8]); and alemtuzumab (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.85; P = .009; 5-year absolute risk, 10% [4 of 44] vs 25% [23 of 92]; median follow-up, 7.4 years [IQR, 6.0-8.6]). Initial treatment with fingolimod, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab was associated with a lower risk of conversion than initial treatment with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99; P = .046); 5-year absolute risk, 7% [16 of 235] vs 12% [46 of 380]; median follow-up, 5.8 years [IQR, 4.7-8.0]). The probability of conversion was lower when glatiramer acetate or interferon beta was started within 5 years of disease onset vs later (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; P = .03; 5-year absolute risk, 3% [4 of 120] vs 6% [2 of 38]; median follow-up, 13.4 years [IQR, 11-18.1]). When glatiramer acetate or interferon beta were escalated to fingolimod, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab within 5 years vs later, the HR was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < .001; 5-year absolute risk, 8% [25 of 307] vs 14% [46 of 331], median follow-up, 5.3 years [IQR], 4.6-6.1).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with relapsing-remitting MS, initial treatment with fingolimod, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab was associated with a lower risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS vs initial treatment with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta. These findings, considered along with these therapies' risks, may help inform decisions about DMT selection.

The Effect of Disease Modifying Therapies on Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses

Background: Disease modifying therapy (DMT) efficacy trials make an essential contribution to the development of evidence-based clinical treatments and practices for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Meta-analysis is a critical part of this process and provides a powerful tool to assess the effects of DMT on MS progression. However, although there have been several meta-analyses on the effect of DMT on MS disease progression, they often do not reach the same conclusions.

Objective: Our aim was to better understand and contextualize the results of meta-analyses evaluating DMT, identify differences in methodology that might explain their differing conclusions, and highlight areas for future research that will improve our ability to develop clinical recommendations.

Methods: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of DMT on disability progression in people with MS in PubMed (Medline) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Results: We included 22 meta-analyses in this overview: eight general (on >3 DMT), 11 specific (on ≤3 DMT), 2 that evaluated subsets, and 1 that evaluated long-term effects. We found that there is good evidence that DMT improve short-term (≤2–3 years) disability progression outcomes relative to placebo in people with relapsing-remitting MS. However, results varied substantially between meta-analyses, and there is little evidence of their efficacy in other populations or over longer periods. The relative effects of individual DMT also remain unclear. The variance in results between meta-analyses may be related to the substantial differences in inclusion criteria, which was reflected in the limited overlap in included studies, as well as the year of meta-analysis publication. Of the 123 total unique studies included in the general meta-analyses, 77 (62.6%) were included in only one meta-analysis. This incongruence was also evident in the included DMT. Six of the 16 (37.5%) DMT evaluated in the general meta-analyses were only included in one meta-analysis.

Conclusions: Translating DMT efficacy studies into evidence-based clinical practice requires greater methodological consistency in meta-analyses, more data on the relative effects of DMT through head-to-head clinical trials, and better reporting of adverse events.

Regulatory B and T lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis: friends or foes?

Current clinical experience with immunomodulatory agents and monoclonal antibodies in principle has established the benefit of depleting lymphocytic populations in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). B and T cells may exert multiple pro-inflammatory actions, but also possess regulatory functions making their role in RRMS pathogenesis much more complex. There is no clear correlation of Tregs and Bregs with clinical features of the disease. Herein, we discuss the emerging data on regulatory T and B cell subset distributions in MS and their roles in the pathophysiology of MS and its murine model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). In addition, we summarize the immunomodulatory properties of certain MS therapeutic agents through their effect on such regulatory cell subsets and their relevance to clinical outcomes.

Interferon β for Multiple Sclerosis

Despite that the availability of new therapeutic options has expanded the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy arsenal, interferon β (IFN-β) remains an important therapy option in the current decision-making process. This review will summarize the present knowledge of IFN-β mechanism of action, the overall safety, and the short- and long-term efficacy of its use in relapsing remitting MS and clinically isolated syndromes. Data on secondary progressive MS is also provided, although no clear benefit was identified.

Recent developments in interferon-based therapies for multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and disabling immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. Beta-interferons are the first approved and still the most widely used first-line disease-modifying treatment in MS.

AREAS COVERED

Here we focus on recent developments in pharmacology and delivery systems of beta-interferons, and discuss their place within current state of the art therapeutic approaches. We briefly review the clinical trials for classical and PEGylated formulations, emphasizing effectiveness, safety concerns, and tolerability. The mechanisms of action of IFN-β in view of MS pathogenesis are also debated

EXPERT OPINION

Though only modestly efficient in reducing the annualized relapse rate, beta-interferons remain a valid first-line option due to their good long-term safety profile and cost-efficacy. Moreover, they are endogenous class II cytokines essential for mounting an effective antiviral response, and they may interact with putative MS triggering factors such as Epstein-Barr virus infection and human endogenous retroviruses. Recent improvements in formulations, delivery devices and drug regimens tackle the tolerability and adherence issues frequently seen with these drugs, and scientific advances may offer means for a better selection of patients. Although a well-established immunomodulatory treatment, beta-interferons have not said their last word in the management of MS.

Changes in disability in people with multiple sclerosis: a 10-year prospective study

Background

Little is known about the long-term course of disability in relation with disease severity in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

Objective

To explore changes in a broad spectrum of disability over 10 years in relation with disease severity in PwMS.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal study of 155 PwMS who attended the MS Centre at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm. Disease severity was determined by the use of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and classified as mild MS (EDSS score 0–3.5) or moderate/severe MS (EDSS score 4–9.5). Ten-year changes in perceived physical and psychological impacts of MS, walking, cognition, manual dexterity, participation in social/lifestyle activities, and signs of depression were compared between PwMS with mild and moderate/severe MS at baseline.

Results

Although walking, manual dexterity, and cognition declined in both groups, only the moderate/severe group demonstrated that long-term increased physical impact of MS, increased wheel-chair dependency, and reduced participation in social/lifestyle activities. Perceived psychological impact of MS declined in both groups, while signs of depression were experienced by fewer in the mild group and remained unaltered in the moderate/severe group.

Conclusion

We found a more pronounced increase in disability across 10 years in individuals with moderate/severe MS compared to mild MS. These findings accentuate the importance of developing a variety of interventions that can be applied across the spectrum of disease severity.

A 8-year retrospective cohort study comparing Interferon-β formulations for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Interferon-β has been approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS), whereas its efficacy in preventing long-term disability and conversion to secondary progressive (SP) MS is still debated. We aim to compare long-term clinical evolution of newly-diagnosed RRMS patients treated with different Interferon-β formulations.

METHODS

507 patients were included in the analysis and followed-up for 8.5 ± 3.9 years. 37.6% were treated with subcutaneous Interferon-β1a 44mcg, 33.4% with intramuscular Interferon-β1a 30mcg, and 29.0% with subcutaneous Interferon-β1b 250mcg. Relapse occurrence, 1-point EDSS progression, reaching of EDSS 4.0 and conversion to SP were recorded as outcome measures. To reduce the selection bias, we calculated the propensity score of receiving the specific treatment considering age (32.7 ± 8.3 years), gender (female 63.1%), disease duration (2.7 ± 2.8 years), and baseline EDSS (1.5, range 1.0-3.5). Propensity score and covariates (age, gender, disease duration and EDSS) were included in the statistical models.

RESULTS

At Cox regression models, the reaching of EDSS 4.0 was not-significantly higher for Interferon-β1b 250mcg (HR = 1.207; p = 0.063) and for Interferon-β1a 30mcg (HR = 1.363; p = 0.095), when compared with Interferon-β1a 44mcg. The rate of SP conversion was higher for Interferon-β1b 250mcg (HR = 2.054; p = 0.042), and not-significantly higher for Interferon-β1a 30mcg (HR = 1.884; p = 0.081), when compared with Interferon-β1a 44mcg.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with Interferon-β1a 44mcg presented with a marginally reduced risk of disability accrual in the long-term, when compared with Interferon-β1b 250mcg and, at least in part, with Interferon-β1a 30mcg. Formulation, frequency of administration and dose of Interferon-β might affect the long-term clinical evolution of RRMS.

Therapeutic Targets for Multiple Sclerosis: Current Treatment Goals and Future Directions

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, and the most common cause of nontraumatic disability in young adults. Most patients have a relapsing-remitting course, and roughly half of them will eventually enter a degenerative progressive phase, marked by gradual accrual of disability over time in the absence of relapses. Early initiation of treatment has delayed the onset of disability progression. Thus, there is increased interest in treating to target in MS, particularly targeting no evidence of disease activity. This review will describe the most common treatment goals in MS: the Rio scores, disease-free survival, and no evidence of disease activity. We will also cover how well current disease-modifying therapies achieve no evidence of disease activity, and discuss future options for improving MS treatment targets.

A Potential Life-Threatening Reaction to Glatiramer Acetate in Rett Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rett syndrome is an X-linked dominant neurodevelopmental disorder manifesting with severe intellectual disability in females caused by various mutations in the MECP2 gene. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one of the main proteins regulated by the MECP2 protein; its overexpression in the MeCP2 mouse model partially corrects the Rett phenotype. Pharmacologic manipulations that lead to increased BDNF in individuals with Rett syndrome are expected to have a positive effect on the disorder. Glatiramer acetate, a well-known and safe multiple sclerosis immune modulator, increases BDNF levels in multiple sclerosis animal models and patients responding to treatment, as well as in Rett mouse models.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with mutation-proven Rett syndrome were recruited for a clinical trial with glatiramer acetate. Baseline data and follow-up data were collected during the trial, which had to be stopped because of a severe adverse event. Our objective is to describe this unexpected potentially life-threatening event in response to glatiramer in patients with Rett syndrome.

RESULTS

Four of 14 patients with Rett syndrome who were recruited and treated with daily injections of glatiramer acetate as part of an open-label clinical trial developed an exaggerated immediate postinjection response, which was experienced as life threatening in three of the patients, necessitating arrest of the trial.

CONCLUSION

Despite the known safety profile of glatiramer acetate in adult and pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis, its use in Rett syndrome should be cautiously reconsidered. The described severe adverse event can be related to these patients' primary autonomic nervous system dysfunction.

Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Interferons-beta (IFNs-beta) and glatiramer acetate (GA) were the first two disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved 20 years ago for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). DMTs' prescription rates as first or switching therapies and their costs have both increased substantially over the past decade. As more DMTs become available, the choice of a specific DMT should reflect the risk/benefit profile, as well as the impact on quality of life. As MS cohorts enrolled in different studies can vary significantly, head-to-head trials are considered the best approach for gaining objective reliable data when two different drugs are compared. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarise available evidence on the comparative effectiveness of IFNs-beta and GA on disease course through the analysis of head-to-head trials.This is an update of the Cochrane review 'Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis' (first published in the Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 7).

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether IFNs-beta and GA differ in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Trials Register of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group (08 August 2016) and the reference lists of retrieved articles. We contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing directly IFNs-beta versus GA in study participants affected by RRMS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials were included and five trials contributed to this review with data. A total of 2904 participants were randomly assigned to IFNs (1704) and GA (1200). The treatment duration was three years for one study, two years for the other four RCTs while one study was stopped early (after one year). The IFNs analysed in comparison with GA were IFN-beta 1b 250 mcg (two trials, 933 participants), IFN-beta 1a 44 mcg (three trials, 466 participants) and IFN-beta 1a 30 mcg (two trials, 305 participants). Enrolled participants were affected by active RRMS. All studies were at high risk for attrition bias. Three trials are still ongoing, one of them completed.Both therapies showed similar clinical efficacy at 24 months, given the primary outcome variables (number of participants with relapse (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.24) or progression (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.35). However at 36 months, evidence from a single study suggests that relapse rates were higher in the group given IFNs than in the GA group (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.74, P value 0.002).Secondary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes analysis showed that effects on new or enlarging T2- or new contrast-enhancing T1 lesions at 24 months were similar (mean difference (MD) -0.15, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.39, and MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.02, respectively). However, the reduction in T2- and T1-weighted lesion volume was significantly greater in the groups given IFNs than in the GA groups (MD -0.58, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.18, P value 0.004, and MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.07, P value 0.003, respectively).The number of participants who dropped out of the study because of adverse events was similar in the two groups (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.40).The quality of evidence for primary outcomes was judged as moderate for clinical end points, but for safety and some MRI outcomes (number of active T2 lesions), quality was judged as low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of IFNs-beta and GA in the treatment of people with RRMS, including clinical (e.g. people with relapse, risk to progression) and MRI (Gd-enhancing lesions) measures, seem to be similar or to show only small differences. When MRI lesion load accrual is considered, the effect of the two treatments differs, in that IFNs-beta were found to limit the increase in lesion burden as compared with GA. Evidence was insufficient for a comparison of the effects of the two treatments on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.