Recomendaciones para el uso de everolimus en trasplante renal de novo: falsas creencias, mitos y realidades

Difficult-to-Treat Rejections in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Our Experience with Everolimus-Based Quadruple Maintenance Therapy

All chronic and treatment-resistant acute rejections are "difficult-to-treat" and lead to progressive loss of graft function in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), as no effective treatment exists for such rejections to date. We review our experience with a novel strategy to treat such rejections by adding everolimus as a "rescue" to conventional triple maintenance therapy with prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor. We retrospectively analysed data in 28 KTR who received everolimus-based quadruple therapy at our institution for biopsy-proven chronic active T cell-mediated or antibody-mediated rejection (n = 19) or treatment-resistant acute rejections (n = 9) between 2011-2017. The primary outcome was 5-year death-censored graft survival. Main secondary outcomes were response to treatment defined by stable or improved graft function, 5-year patient survival and discontinuation rate of treatment. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for 5-year death-censored graft survival was 79% in all patients, 90% for patients with chronic active T cell-mediated rejections, 78% for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection and 67% for acute rejections. Response to treatment was achieved in 43% and 5-year patient survival was 94%. Treatment was stopped in 12 (43%) patients due to adverse events. Everolimus-based maintenance quadruple therapy, despite high rate of everolimus discontinuation due to adverse events, may be a valid approach in a subset of kidney transplant recipients with such difficult-to-treat rejections, which otherwise would lead to a high rate of graft loss.

Development and Validation of A Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method to Simultaneously Measure Tacrolimus and Everolimus Concentrations in Kidney Allograft Biopsies After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary for immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and everolimus after kidney transplantation. Several studies have suggested that the concentrations of immunosuppressive agents in allografts may better reflect clinical outcomes than whole blood concentrations. This study aimed to develop a method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and everolimus concentrations in clinical biopsy samples and investigate their correlation with histopathological findings in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Fourteen biopsy samples were obtained from kidney transplant recipients at 3 months after transplantation. Kidney allograft concentrations (Ctissue) of tacrolimus and everolimus were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the corresponding whole blood trough concentrations (C0) were obtained from clinical records.

RESULTS

The developed method was validated over a concentration range of 0.02-2.0 ng/mL for tacrolimus and 0.04-4.0 ng/mL for everolimus in kidney tissue homogenate. The Ctissue of tacrolimus and everolimus in kidney biopsies ranged from 21.0 to 86.7 pg/mg tissue and 33.5-105.0 pg/mg tissue, respectively. Dose-adjusted Ctissue of tacrolimus and everolimus was significantly correlated with the dose-adjusted C0 (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0479, respectively). No significant association was observed between the Ctissue of tacrolimus and everolimus and the histopathologic outcomes at 3 months after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This method could support further investigation of the clinical relevance of tacrolimus and everolimus allograft concentrations after kidney transplantation.

Immunosuppressive Drugs

Immunosuppressant is a class of medicines that inhibit or decrease the intensity of the immune response in the body. Most of these medications are used to allow the body less likely to resist a transplanted organ. In solid organ transplantation, immunosuppressive agents are needed for the activation of early-stage immunosuppression, the management of late-stage immunosuppression or for the maintenance of organ rejection. The emergence of novel agents and improvements in immunosuppression regimens after transplantation are significant factors leading to this progress. However, these drugs also increase the risk of infection, cancers and specific adverse side effects specific to each agent in patients particularly in pregnant women and fertility issues. Corona virus disease being hot topic of debate is has given positive outcome to immunosuppressive drugs however need more attention in future. Transplant centers across the world utilize multiple immunosuppression protocols; nevertheless, each patient can require an individually formulated immunosuppression regimen to manage the advantages and possible damage of treatment thus eliminating the likelihood of their primary disease recurrence.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The short-term efficacy and safety of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus have been described in several clinical trials. Yet, detailed long-term data comparing the use of everolimus or mycophenolate in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus is lacking.

METHODS

This is a 5-year follow-up post hoc analysis of a prospective trial including 288 patients who were randomized to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r-ATG/EVR, n=85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n=102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n=101).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the incidence of treatment failure (31.8% vs. 40.2% vs. 34.7%, p=0.468), de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (6.5 vs. 11.7 vs. 4.0%, p=0.185), patient (92.9% vs. 94.1% vs. 92.1%, p = 0.854) and death-censored graft (87.1% vs. 90.2% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.498) survivals. Using a sensitive analysis, the trajectories of eGFR were comparable in the intention-to-treat (p=0.145) and per protocol (p=0.354) populations. There were no differences in study drug discontinuation rate (22.4% vs. 30.4% vs. 17.8%, p=0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this analysis in a cohort of de novo low/moderate immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients suggests that the use of a single 3mg/kg r-ATG dose followed by EVR combined with reduced TAC concentrations was associated with similar efficacy and renal function compared to the standard of care immunosuppressive regimen.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C160.

Use of De Novo mTOR Inhibitors in Hypersensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Experience From Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

It is commonly believed that mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) should not be used in high-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients due to a perceived increased risk of rejection. However, almost all trials that examined the association of optimal-dose mTORi with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have excluded hypersensitized recipients from enrollment.

METHODS

To shed light on this issue, we examined 71 consecutive patients with a baseline calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥50% that underwent kidney transplantation from June 2013 to December 2016 in our unit. Immunosuppression was based on CNI (tacrolimus), steroids and alternatively mycophenolic acid (MPA; n = 38), or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 33, target trough levels 3-8 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Demographic and immunological risk profiles were similar, and almost 90% of patients in both groups received induction with lymphocyte-depleting agents. Cox-regression analysis of rejection-free survival revealed better results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection (hazard ratio [confidence interval], 0.32 [0.11-0.90], P = 0.031 at univariable analysis and 0.34 [0.11-0.95], P = 0.040 at multivariable analysis). There were no differences in 1-year renal function, Banff chronicity score at 3- and 12-month protocol biopsy and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Tacrolimus trough levels along the first year were not different between groups (12-mo levels were 8.72 ± 2.93 and 7.85 ± 3.07 ng/mL for MPA and mTORi group respectively, P = 0.277).

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center retrospective cohort analysis suggests that in hypersensitized kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy similar clinical outcomes may be obtained using mTOR inhibitors compared to mycophenolate.

Effectiveness of Maintenance Immunosuppression Therapies in a Matched-Pair Analysis Cohort of 16 Years of Renal Transplant in the Brazilian National Health System

The maintenance of patients with renal transplant typically involves two or more drugs to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival. The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the most commonly recommended medicines in combinations with others. While immunosuppressive treatment regimens are well established, there is insufficient long-term effectiveness data to help guide future management decisions. The study analyzes the effectiveness of treatment regimens containing CNI after renal transplantation during 16 years of follow-up with real-world data from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS). This was a retrospective study of 2318 SUS patients after renal transplantion. Patients were propensity score-matched (1:1) by sex, age, type and year of transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probabilities of survival. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors associated with progression to graft loss. Multivariable analysis, adjusted for diabetes mellitus and race/color, showed a greater risk of graft loss for patients using tacrolimus plus mycophenolate compared to patients treated with cyclosporine plus azathioprine. In conclusion, this Brazilian real-world study, with a long follow-up period using matched analysis for relevant clinical features and the representativeness of the sample, demonstrated improved long-term effectiveness for therapeutic regimens containing cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Consequently, we recommend that protocols and clinical guidelines for renal transplantation should consider the cyclosporine plus azathioprine regimen as a potential first line option, along with others.

Combination of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a propensity score analysis based on current clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

The TRANSFORM study demonstrated that an immunosuppression based on a combination of calcineurin inhibitors and de-novo mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) is safe and effective in kidney transplant recipients. However, data that validate this approach in clinical practice are currently missing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of 401 kidney transplant recipients transplanted from June 2013 to December 2016. All patients received tacrolimus with prednisone in combination with either mycophenolate (n = 186) or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 215). A propensity score to receive mTORi was calculated based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) from the following parameters: age and sex of donor and recipient, BMI, previous transplants, diabetes, cPRA, dialysis before transplantation, dialysis vintage, type of donor, ABO-incompatibility, HLA-mismatches, induction and ischemia time. Median follow-up was 2.6 [1.9; 3.7] years.

RESULTS

Cox-regression analysis suggests good results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of 1-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, P = 0.063), 1-year graft loss (P = 0.025) and patient survival (P < 0.001). Results observed for BPAR and graft failure were largely attributed to those patients that would have been excluded by the TRANSFORM because of some exclusion criteria (52.9% of the population, P = 0.003 for 1-year BPAR and P = 0.040 for graft loss). In patients who met selection criteria for TRANSFORM, no effect of treatment for BPAR or graft failure was observed, while the beneficial effect on overall survival persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, a protocol based on de-novo mTORi with tacrolimus and prednisone could be employed as a standard immunosuppressive regimen and was associated with good outcomes.

Two-year outcomes in de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor reduction regimen from the TRANSFORM study

TRANSFORM (TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus-based regiMen) was a 24-month, prospective, open-label trial in 2037 de novo renal transplant recipients randomized (1:1) within 24 hours of transplantation to receive everolimus (EVR) with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR + rCNI) or mycophenolate with standard-exposure CNI. Consistent with previously reported 12-month findings, noninferiority of the EVR + rCNI regimen for the primary endpoint of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 mL/min per 1.73 m² was achieved at month 24 (47.9% vs 43.7%; difference = 4.2%; 95% confidence interval = -0.3, 8.7; P = .006). Mean eGFR was stable up to month 24 (52.6 vs 54.9 mL/min per 1.73 m² ) in both arms. The incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) was lower in the EVR + rCNI arm (12.3% vs 17.6%) among on-treatment patients. Although discontinuation rates due to adverse events were higher with EVR + rCNI (27.2% vs 15.0%), rates of cytomegalovirus (2.8% vs 13.5%) and BK virus (5.8% vs 10.3%) infections were lower. Cytomegalovirus infection rates were significantly lower with EVR + rCNI even in the D+/R- high-risk group (P < .0001). In conclusion, the EVR + rCNI regimen offers comparable efficacy and graft function with low tBPAR and dnDSA rates and significantly lower incidence of viral infections relative to standard-of-care up to 24 months. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01950819.

Evidence-based practice: Guidance for using everolimus in combination with low-exposure calcineurin inhibitors as initial immunosuppression in kidney transplant patients

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, in combination with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), has been demonstrated in clinical trials to have comparable efficacy in low-to-moderate immunological risk kidney transplant recipients to the Standard of Care, mycophenolic acid (MPA) in combination with standard-exposure CNI. Current treatment guidelines consider mTOR inhibitors to be a second-line therapy in the majority of cases; however, given that everolimus-based regimens are associated with a reduced rate of viral infections after transplantation, their wider use could have great benefits for kidney transplant patients. In this evidence-based practice guideline, we consider the de novo use of everolimus in kidney transplant recipients. The main outcomes of our consideration of the available evidence are that: 1. Everolimus, in combination with reduced-exposure CNI and low dose steroids, is a suitable regimen for the prophylaxis of kidney transplant rejection in the majority of low-to-moderate immunological risk adult patients, with individualized management; 2. Induction with either basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin is an effective therapy for kidney transplant recipients when initiating an everolimus-based, reduced-exposure CNI regimen; and 3. An individualized approach should be adopted when managing kidney transplant recipients on everolimus-based therapy.

Impact of immune suppressive agents on the BK-Polyomavirus non coding control region

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of the BK-Polyomavirus (BKPyV) can cause a polyomavirus associated nephropathy in approx. 10% of kidney transplant recipients. In these cases, current therapy is based on the reduction of immunosuppression. Since BKPyV-transcription is driven by the Non-Coding-Control-Region (NCCR) we were interested whether NCCR-activity is affected by immunosuppressive agents.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 45 BKPyV-positive patients after renal transplantation were subjected to PCR-analysis. NCCR-amplicons were cloned into a plasmid that allows the quantification of early and late NCCR-activity by tdTomato and eGFP expression, respectively. HEK293T-cells were transfected with the reporter-plasmids, treated with immunosuppressive agents, and subjected to FACS-analysis. In addition, H727-cells were infected with patient derived BKPyV, treated with mTOR-inhibitors, and NCCR activity was analysed using qRT-PCR.

RESULTS

While tacrolimus and cyclosporine-A did not affect NCCR-promoter-activity, treatment with mTOR1-inhibitor rapamycin resulted in the reduction of early, but not late-NCCR-promoter-activity. Treatment with dual mTOR1/2 inhibitors (INK128 or pp242) led to significant inhibition of early, however, concomitantly enhanced late-promoter-activity. In BKPyV infected cells both rapamycin and INK128 reduced early expression, however, INK128 resulted in higher late-mRNA levels when compared to rapamycin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that mTOR1-inhibitors are able to reduce early-expression of wildtype and rearranged NCCRs, which might contribute to previously described inhibition of BKPyV-replication. Dual mTOR1/2-inhibitors, however, additionally might shift viral early into late-expression promoting synthesis of viral structural proteins and particle production.