Protein Phosphatase 1 Regulatory Subunit SDS22 Inhibits Breast Cancer Cell Tumorigenesis by Functioning as a Negative Regulator of the AKT Signaling Pathway

Radiotherapy resistance driven by Asparagine endopeptidase through ATR pathway modulation in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumor resistance represents a major challenge in the current oncology landscape. Asparagine endopeptidase (AEP) overexpression correlates with worse prognosis and reduced overall survival in most human solid tumors. However, the underlying mechanisms of the connection between AEP and reduced overall survival in cancer patients remain unclear.

METHODS

High-throughput proteomics, cellular and molecular biology approaches and clinical data from breast cancer (BC) patients were used to identify novel, biologically relevant AEP targets. Immunoblotting and qPCR analyses were used to quantify protein and mRNA levels. Flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, chemical inhibitors, siRNA- and shRNA-silencing and DNA repair assays were used as functional assays. In-silico analyses using the TCGA BC dataset and immunofluorescence assays in an independent cohort of invasive ductal (ID) BC patients were used to validate the clinical relevance of our findings.

RESULTS

Here we showed a dual role for AEP in genomic stability and radiotherapy resistance in BC patients by suppressing ATR and PPP1R10 levels. Reduced ATR and PPP1R10 levels were found in BC patients expressing high AEP levels and correlated with worst prognosis. Mechanistically, AEP suppresses ATR levels, reducing DNA damage-induced cell death, and PPP1R10 levels, promoting Chek1/P53 cell cycle checkpoint activation, allowing BC cells to efficiently repair DNA. Functional studies revealed AEP-deficiency results in genomic instability, increased DNA damage signaling, reduced Chek1/P53 activation, impaired DNA repair and cell death, with phosphatase inhibitors restoring the DNA damage response in AEP-deficient BC cells. Furthermore, AEP inhibition sensitized BC cells to the chemotherapeutic reagents cisplatin and etoposide. Immunofluorescence assays in an independent cohort of IDBC patients showed increased AEP levels in ductal cells. These analyses showed that higher AEP levels in radioresistant IDBC patients resulted in ATR nuclear eviction, revealing AEPhigh/ATRlow protein levels as an efficient predictive biomarker for the stratification of radioresistant patients.

CONCLUSION

The newly identified AEP/ATR/PPP1R10 axis plays a dual role in genomic stability and radiotherapy resistance in BC. Our work provides new clues to the underlying mechanisms of tumor resistance and strong evidence validating the AEP/ATR axis as a novel predictive biomarker and therapeutic target for the stratification and treatment of radioresistant BC patients.

Protein serine/threonine phosphatases in tumor microenvironment: a vital player and a promising therapeutic target

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is involved in cancer initiation and progression. With advances in the TME field, numerous therapeutic approaches, such as antiangiogenic treatment and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been inspired and developed. Nevertheless, the sophisticated regulatory effects on the biological balance of the TME remain unclear. Decoding the pathological features of the TME is urgently needed to understand the tumor ecosystem and develop novel antitumor treatments. Protein serine/threonine phosphatases (PSPs) are responsible for inverse protein phosphorylation processes. Aberrant expression and dysfunction of PSPs disturb cellular homeostasis, reprogram metabolic processes and reshape the immune landscape, thereby contributing to cancer progression. Some therapeutic implications, such as the use of PSPs as targets, have drawn the attention of researchers and clinicians. To date, the effects of PSP inhibitors are less satisfactory in real-world practice. With breakthroughs in sequencing technologies, scientists can decipher TME investigations via multiomics and higher resolution. These benefits provide an opportunity to explore the TME in a more comprehensive manner and inspire more findings concerning PSPs in the TME. The current review starts by introducing the canonical knowledge of PSPs, including their members, structures and posttranslational modifications for activities. We then summarize the functions of PSPs in regulating cellular homeostasis. In particular, we specified the up-to-date roles of PSPs in modulating the immune microenvironment, adopting hypoxia, reprogramming metabolic processes, and responding to extracellular matrix remodeling. Finally, we introduce preclinical PSP inhibitors with translational value and conclude with clinical trials of PSP inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Zebrafish ppp1r21 mutant as a model for the study of primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune cholestatic liver disease that progresses to fibrosis and cirrhosis, resulting from the gradual destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. Exploring genetic variants associated with PBC is essential to understand the pathogenesis of PBC. Here we identify a zebrafish balloon dog (blg) mutant with intrahepatic bile duct branching defects, exhibiting several key pathological PBC-like features, including immunodominant autoantigen PDC-E2 production, cholangiocyte apoptosis, immune cell infiltration, inflammatory activation, and liver fibrosis. blg encodes the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 21 (Ppp1r21), which is enriched in the liver and its peripheral tissues and plays a vital role in the early intrahepatic bile duct formation stage. Further studies show an excessive activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the hepatic tissues in the mutant, while treatment with the pathway inhibitor LY294002 and rapamycin partially rescues intrahepatic bile duct branching defects and alleviates the PBC-like symptoms. These findings implicate the potential role of the Ppp1r21-mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the pathophysiology of PBC.

Participation of protein metabolism in cancer progression and its potential targeting for the management of cancer

Cancer malignancies may broadly be described as heterogeneous disorders manifested by uncontrolled cellular growth/division and proliferation. Tumor cells utilize metabolic reprogramming to accomplish the upregulated nutritional requirements for sustaining their uncontrolled growth, proliferation, and survival. Metabolic reprogramming also called altered or dysregulated metabolism undergoes modification in normal metabolic pathways for anabolic precursor's generation that serves to continue biomass formation that sustains the growth, proliferation, and survival of carcinogenic cells under a nutrition-deprived microenvironment. A wide range of dysregulated/altered metabolic pathways encompassing different metabolic regulators have been described; however, the current review is focused to explain deeply the metabolic pathways modifications inducing upregulation of proteins/amino acids metabolism. The essential modification of various metabolic cycles with their consequent outcomes meanwhile explored promising therapeutic targets playing a pivotal role in metabolic regulation and is successfully employed for effective target-specific cancer treatment. The current review is aimed to understand the metabolic reprogramming of different proteins/amino acids involved in tumor progression along with potential therapeutic perspective elucidating targeted cancer therapy via these targets.

Loss of miR-936 leads to acquisition of androgen-independent metastatic phenotype in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) progresses from a hormone-sensitive, androgen-dependent to a hormone-refractory, androgen-independent metastatic phenotype. Among the many genes implicated, ANXA2, a calcium-dependent phospholipid binding protein, has been found to have a critical role in the progression of PCa into more invasive metastatic phenotype. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the absence of ANXA2 in early PCa and its recurrence in advanced stage are yet unknown. Moreover, recent studies have observed the deregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in the development and progression of PCa. In this study, we found the down-regulation of miR-936 in metastatic PCa wherein its target ANXA2 was overexpressed. Subsequently, it has been shown that the downregulation of miRNA biogenesis by siRNA treatment in ANXA2-null LNCaP cells could induce the expression of ANXA2, indicating the miRNA mediated regulation of ANXA2 expression. Additionally, we demonstrate that miR-936 regulates ANXA2 expression by direct interaction at coding as well as 3'UTR region of ANXA2 mRNA by luciferase reporter assay. Furthermore, the overexpression of miR-936 suppresses the cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell migration, and invasion abilities of metastatic PCa PC-3 cells in vitro and tumor forming ability in vivo. These results indicate that miR-936 have tumor suppressor properties by regulating the over expression of ANXA2 in hormone-independent metastatic PCa. Moreover, our results suggest that this tumor suppressor miR-936 could be developed as a targeted therapeutic molecule for metastatic PCa control and to improve the prognosis in PCa patients.

Exploring prognostic value and regulation network of PPP1R1A in hepatocellular carcinoma

Novel and accurate biomarkers are needed for early detection and progression evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 1A (PPP1R1A) has been studied in cancer biology; however, the expression pattern and biological function of PPP1R1A in HCC are unclear. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in HCC were screened by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay were used to detect the expression of PPP1R1A in BALB/c mice, human normal tissues and corresponding tumor tissues, especially HCC. Then, Kaplan-Meier analysis of patients with HCC was performed to evaluate the relationship between PPP1R1A expression and prognosis. The transcriptional regulatory network of PPP1R1A was constructed based on the differentially expressed mRNAs, microRNAs and transcription factors (TFs). To explore the downstream regulation of PPP1R1A, the Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional enrichment analysis and immune infiltration score were performed. A total of 4 DEGs were screened out. PPP1R1A was differentially distributed and expressed in BALB/c mice and human tissues. PPP1R1A expression was higher in normal tissues than that in tumor tissues, and patients with higher PPP1R1A expression had better clinical outcome in HCC. In addition, we constructed miR-21-3p/TAL1/PPP1R1A transcriptional network. Furthermore, PPP1R1A may modulate the activation of PI3K-Akt pathway, cell cycle, glycogen metabolism and the recruitment of M2 macrophage in HCC. This study may help to clarify the function and mechanism of PPP1R1A in HCC and provide a potential biomarker for tumor prevention and treatment.

Plasmodium berghei leucine-rich repeat protein 1 downregulates protein phosphatase 1 activity and is required for efficient oocyst development

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is a key enzyme for Plasmodium development. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying its regulation remain to be deciphered. Here, we report the functional characterization of the Plasmodium berghei leucine-rich repeat protein 1 (PbLRR1), an orthologue of SDS22, one of the most ancient and conserved PP1 interactors. Our study shows that PbLRR1 is expressed during intra-erythrocytic development of the parasite, and up to the zygote stage in mosquitoes. PbLRR1 can be found in complex with PbPP1 in both asexual and sexual stages and inhibits its phosphatase activity. Genetic analysis demonstrates that PbLRR1 depletion adversely affects the development of oocysts. PbLRR1 interactome analysis associated with phospho-proteomics studies identifies several novel putative PbLRR1/PbPP1 partners. Some of these partners have previously been characterized as essential for the parasite sexual development. Interestingly, and for the first time, Inhibitor 3 (I3), a well-known and direct interactant of Plasmodium PP1, was found to be drastically hypophosphorylated in PbLRR1-depleted parasites. These data, along with the detection of I3 with PP1 in the LRR1 interactome, strongly suggest that the phosphorylation status of PbI3 is under the control of the PP1-LRR1 complex and could contribute (in)directly to oocyst development. This study provides new insights into previously unrecognized PbPP1 fine regulation of Plasmodium oocyst development through its interaction with PbLRR1.

PPP1R7 Is a Novel Translocation Partner of CBFB via t(2;16)(q37;q22) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

In a subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases, the core binding factor beta subunit gene (CBFB) was rearranged via inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22), in which the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain 11 gene (MYH11) was the partner (CBFB::MYH11). Rare variants of CBFB rearrangement occurring via non-classic chromosomal aberrations have been reported, such as t(1;16), t(2;16), t(3;16), t(5;16), and t(16;19), but the partners of CBFB have not been characterized. We report a case of AML with a complex karyotype, including t(2;16)(q37;q22), in which the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 7 gene (PPP1R7) at chromosome 2q37 was rearranged with CBFB (CBFB::PPP1R7). This abnormality was inconspicuous by conventional karyotype and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), thus leading to an initial interpretation of inv(16)(p13.1q22); however, metaphase FISH showed that the CBFB rearrangement involved chromosome 2. Using whole genome and Sanger sequencing, the breakpoints were identified as being located in intron 5 of CBFB and intron 7 of PPP1R7. A microhomology of CAG was found in the break and reconnection sites of CBFB and PPP1R7, thus supporting the formation of CBFB::PPP1R7 by microhomology-mediated end joining.

Modulation of serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) complexes: A promising approach in cancer treatment

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the availability of numerous therapeutic options, tumor heterogeneity and chemoresistance have limited the success of these treatments, and the development of effective anticancer therapies remains a major focus in oncology research. The serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and its complexes have been recognized as potential drug targets. Research on the modulation of PP1 complexes is currently at an early stage, but has immense potential. Chemically diverse compounds have been developed to disrupt or stabilize different PP1 complexes in various cancer types, with the objective of inhibiting disease progression. Beneficial results obtained in vitro now require further pre-clinical and clinical validation. In conclusion, the modulation of PP1 complexes seems to be a promising, albeit challenging, therapeutic strategy for cancer.

Protein phosphatase 1: life-course regulation by SDS22 and Inhibitor-3

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is expressed in all eukaryotic cells and catalyzes a sizable fraction of protein Ser/Thr dephosphorylation events. It is tightly regulated in space and time through association with a wide array of regulatory interactors of protein phosphatase one (RIPPOs). Suppressor-of-Dis2-number 2 (SDS22) and Inhibitor-3 (I3), which form a ternary complex with PP1, are the first two evolved and most widely expressed RIPPOs. Their deletion causes mitotic-arrest phenotypes and is lethal in some organisms. The role of SDS22 and I3 in PP1 regulation has been a mystery for decades as they were independently identified as both activators and inhibitors of PP1. This conundrum has largely been solved by recent reports showing that SDS22 and I3 control multiple steps of the life course of PP1. Indeed, they contribute to (a) the stabilization and activation of newly translated PP1, (b) the translocation of PP1 to the nucleus, and (c) the storage of PP1 as a reserve for holoenzyme assembly. Preliminary evidence suggests that SDS22 and I3 may also function as scavengers of released or aged PP1 for re-use in holoenzyme assembly or proteolytical degradation, respectively. Hence, SDS22 and I3 are emerging as master regulators of the life course of PP1.

New insights into molecules and pathways of cancer metabolism and therapeutic implications

Cancer cells are abnormal cells that can reproduce and regenerate rapidly. They are characterized by unlimited proliferation, transformation and migration, and can destroy normal cells. To meet the needs for cell proliferation and migration, tumor cells acquire molecular materials and energy through unusual metabolic pathways as their metabolism is more vigorous than that of normal cells. Multiple carcinogenic signaling pathways eventually converge to regulate three major metabolic pathways in tumor cells, including glucose, lipid, and amino acid metabolism. The distinct metabolic signatures of cancer cells reflect that metabolic changes are indispensable for the genesis and development of tumor cells. In this review, we report the unique metabolic alterations in tumor cells which occur through various signaling axes, and present various modalities available for cancer diagnosis and clinical therapy. We further provide suggestions for the development of anti‐tumor therapeutic drugs.

Protein phosphatase 1 in tumorigenesis: is it worth a closer look?

Cancer cells take advantage of signaling cascades to meet their requirements for sustained growth and survival. Cell signaling is tightly controlled by reversible protein phosphorylation mechanisms, which require the counterbalanced action of protein kinases and protein phosphatases. Imbalances on this system are associated with cancer development and progression. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is one of the most relevant protein phosphatases in eukaryotic cells. Despite the widely recognized involvement of PP1 in key biological processes, both in health and disease, its relevance in cancer has been largely neglected. Here, we provide compelling evidence that support major roles for PP1 in tumorigenesis.

Controlling Ser/Thr protein phosphatase PP1 activity and function through interaction with regulatory subunits

Protein phosphatase 1 is a major Ser/Thr protein phosphatase activity in eukaryotic cells. It is composed of a catalytic polypeptide (PP1C), with little substrate specificity, that interacts with a large variety of proteins of diverse structure (regulatory subunits). The diversity of holoenzymes that can be formed explain the multiplicity of cellular functions under the control of this phosphatase. In quite a few cases, regulatory subunits have an inhibitory role, downregulating the activity of the phosphatase. In this chapter we shall introduce PP1C and review the most relevant families of PP1C regulatory subunits, with particular emphasis in describing the structural basis for their interaction.

Beyond growth signaling: apoptotic sensor MERTK activates AKT by a novel mechanism

Canonically the oncogenic kinase AKT is activated by growth signals. Our work suggests apoptotic materials, abundant in tumors, also contribute to AKT activation by stimulating MERTK that in turn phosphorylates Y26 in the AKT PH domain. pY26 reverses binding of an AKT endogenous, WW-domain containing inhibitor, SAV1, allowing AKT responsiveness to classic growth signals. This novel mechanism may contribute to drug resistance.

Antrodin C, an NADPH Dependent Metabolism, Encourages Crosstalk between Autophagy and Apoptosis in Lung Carcinoma Cells by Use of an AMPK Inhibition-Independent Blockade of the Akt/mTOR Pathway

The current study aims to explore the possible anti-lung carcinoma activity of ADC as well as the underlying mechanisms by which ADC exerts its actions in NSCLC. Findings showed that ADC potently inhibited the viability of SPCA-1, induced apoptosis triggered by ROS, and arrested the cell cycle at the G2/M phase via a P53 signaling pathway. Interestingly, phenomena such as autophagosomes accumulation, conversion of the LC3-I to LC3-II, etc., indicated that autophagy could be activated by ADC. The blockage of autophagy-augmented ADC induced inhibition of cell proliferation, while autophagy activation restored cell death, indicating that autophagy had a protective effect against cell death which was induced by ADC treatment. Meanwhile, ADC treatment suppressed both the Akt/mTOR and AMPK signaling pathways. The joint action of both ADC and the autophagy inhibitor significantly increased the death of SPCA-1. An in vitro phase I metabolic stability assay showed that ADC was highly metabolized in SD rat liver microsomes and moderately metabolized in human liver microsomes, which will assist in predicting the outcomes of clinical pharmacokinetics and toxicity studies. These findings imply that blocking the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, which was independent of AMPK inhibition, could activate ADC-induced protective autophagy in non-small-cell lung cancer cells.

Role of protein phosphatases PP1, PP2A, PP4 and Cdc14 in the DNA damage response

Maintenance of genome integrity is fundamental for cellular physiology. Our hereditary information encoded in the DNA is intrinsically susceptible to suffer variations, mostly due to the constant presence of endogenous and environmental genotoxic stresses. Genomic insults must be repaired to avoid loss or inappropriate transmission of the genetic information, a situation that could lead to the appearance of developmental anomalies and tumorigenesis. To safeguard our genome, cells have evolved a series of mechanisms collectively known as the DNA damage response (DDR). This surveillance system regulates multiple features of the cellular response, including the detection of the lesion, a transient cell cycle arrest and the restoration of the broken DNA molecule. While the role of multiple kinases in the DDR has been well documented over the last years, the intricate roles of protein dephosphorylation have only recently begun to be addressed. In this review, we have compiled recent information about the function of protein phosphatases PP1, PP2A, PP4 and Cdc14 in the DDR, focusing mainly on their capacity to regulate the DNA damage checkpoint and the repair mechanism encompassed in the restoration of a DNA lesion.