1
|
Jagust WJ, Mattay VS, Krainak DM, Wang SJ, Weidner LD, Hofling AA, Koo H, Hsieh P, Kuo PH, Farrar G, Marzella L. Quantitative Brain Amyloid PET. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:670-678. [PMID: 38514082 PMCID: PMC11064834 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Since the development of amyloid tracers for PET imaging, there has been interest in quantifying amyloid burden in the brains of patients with Alzheimer disease. Quantitative amyloid PET imaging is poised to become a valuable approach in disease staging, theranostics, monitoring, and as an outcome measure for interventional studies. Yet, there are significant challenges and hurdles to overcome before it can be implemented into widespread clinical practice. On November 17, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance cosponsored a public workshop comprising experts from academia, industry, and government agencies to discuss the role of quantitative brain amyloid PET imaging in staging, prognosis, and longitudinal assessment of Alzheimer disease. The workshop discussed a range of topics, including available radiopharmaceuticals for amyloid imaging; the methodology, metrics, and analytic validity of quantitative amyloid PET imaging; its use in disease staging, prognosis, and monitoring of progression; and challenges facing the field. This report provides a high-level summary of the presentations and the discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Venkata S Mattay
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland;
| | - Daniel M Krainak
- Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices, Office of Radiological Health, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Centers for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sue-Jane Wang
- Division of Biometrics I, Office of Biostatistics, Office of Translational Sciences, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Lora D Weidner
- Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices, Office of Radiological Health, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Centers for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - A Alex Hofling
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Hayoung Koo
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Libero Marzella
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barthélemy NR, Salvadó G, Schindler SE, He Y, Janelidze S, Collij LE, Saef B, Henson RL, Chen CD, Gordon BA, Li Y, La Joie R, Benzinger TLS, Morris JC, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Palmqvist S, Ossenkoppele R, Rabinovici GD, Stomrud E, Bateman RJ, Hansson O. Highly accurate blood test for Alzheimer's disease is similar or superior to clinical cerebrospinal fluid tests. Nat Med 2024; 30:1085-1095. [PMID: 38382645 PMCID: PMC11031399 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02869-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
With the emergence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) disease-modifying therapies, identifying patients who could benefit from these treatments becomes critical. In this study, we evaluated whether a precise blood test could perform as well as established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests in detecting amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles. Plasma %p-tau217 (ratio of phosporylated-tau217 to non-phosphorylated tau) was analyzed by mass spectrometry in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 cohort (n = 1,422) and the US Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC) cohort (n = 337). Matched CSF samples were analyzed with clinically used and FDA-approved automated immunoassays for Aβ42/40 and p-tau181/Aβ42. The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of brain Aβ or tau pathology, respectively, using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging as the reference standard. Main analyses were focused on individuals with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia), which is the target population for available disease-modifying treatments. Plasma %p-tau217 was clinically equivalent to FDA-approved CSF tests in classifying Aβ PET status, with an area under the curve (AUC) for both between 0.95 and 0.97. Plasma %p-tau217 was generally superior to CSF tests in classification of tau-PET with AUCs of 0.95-0.98. In cognitively impaired subcohorts (BioFINDER-2: n = 720; Knight ADRC: n = 50), plasma %p-tau217 had an accuracy, a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 89-90% for Aβ PET and 87-88% for tau PET status, which was clinically equivalent to CSF tests, further improving to 95% using a two-cutoffs approach. Blood plasma %p-tau217 demonstrated performance that was clinically equivalent or superior to clinically used FDA-approved CSF tests in the detection of AD pathology. Use of high-performance blood tests in clinical practice can improve access to accurate AD diagnosis and AD-specific treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas R Barthélemy
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Tracy Family Stable Isotope Labeling Quantitation (SILQ) Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Suzanne E Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yingxin He
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Tracy Family Stable Isotope Labeling Quantitation (SILQ) Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shorena Janelidze
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Saef
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rachel L Henson
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Charles D Chen
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Brian A Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tammie L S Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Randall J Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
- Tracy Family Stable Isotope Labeling Quantitation (SILQ) Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young P, Heeman F, Axelsson J, Collij LE, Hitzel A, Sanaat A, Niñerola-Baizan A, Perissinotti A, Lubberink M, Frisoni GB, Zaidi H, Barkhof F, Farrar G, Baker S, Gispert JD, Garibotto V, Rieckmann A, Schöll M. Impact of simulated reduced injected dose on the assessment of amyloid PET scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:734-748. [PMID: 37897616 PMCID: PMC10796642 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06481-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of reduced injected doses on the quantitative and qualitative assessment of the amyloid PET tracers [18F]flutemetamol and [18F]florbetaben. METHODS Cognitively impaired and unimpaired individuals (N = 250, 36% Aβ-positive) were included and injected with [18F]flutemetamol (N = 175) or [18F]florbetaben (N = 75). PET scans were acquired in list-mode (90-110 min post-injection) and reduced-dose images were simulated to generate images of 75, 50, 25, 12.5 and 5% of the original injected dose. Images were reconstructed using vendor-provided reconstruction tools and visually assessed for Aβ-pathology. SUVRs were calculated for a global cortical and three smaller regions using a cerebellar cortex reference tissue, and Centiloid was computed. Absolute and percentage differences in SUVR and CL were calculated between dose levels, and the ability to discriminate between Aβ- and Aβ + scans was evaluated using ROC analyses. Finally, intra-reader agreement between the reduced dose and 100% images was evaluated. RESULTS At 5% injected dose, change in SUVR was 3.72% and 3.12%, with absolute change in Centiloid 3.35CL and 4.62CL, for [18F]flutemetamol and [18F]florbetaben, respectively. At 12.5% injected dose, percentage change in SUVR and absolute change in Centiloid were < 1.5%. AUCs for discriminating Aβ- from Aβ + scans were high (AUC ≥ 0.94) across dose levels, and visual assessment showed intra-reader agreement of > 80% for both tracers. CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept study showed that for both [18F]flutemetamol and [18F]florbetaben, adequate quantitative and qualitative assessments can be obtained at 12.5% of the original injected dose. However, decisions to reduce the injected dose should be made considering the specific clinical or research circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Young
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Axelsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anne Hitzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Amirhossein Sanaat
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aida Niñerola-Baizan
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Perissinotti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Lubberink
- Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva University Neurocenter, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | | - Suzanne Baker
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelona βeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals of Geneva; NIMTLab; Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anna Rieckmann
- Institute for Psychology, Universität Der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Michael Schöll
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lojo-Ramírez JA, Guerra-Gómez M, Marín-Cabañas AM, Fernández-Rodríguez P, Bernal Sánchez-Arjona M, Franco-Macías E, García-Solís D. Correlation Between Amyloid PET Imaging and Discordant Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Results in Patients with Suspected Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 97:447-458. [PMID: 38143353 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the concordance between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers and amyloid-PET findings is well known, there are no data regarding the concordance of amyloid-PET with inconclusive CSF values of amyloid-β (Aβ)1 - 42 and p-tau for the diagnosis of AD. OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between the amyloid-PET results with discordant AD biomarkers values in CSF (Aβ1 - 42+/p-tau-or Aβ1 - 42-/p-tau+). METHODS An observational retrospective study, including 62 patients with mild cognitive impairment (32/62) or dementia (30/62), suspicious of AD who had undergone a lumbar puncture to determine CSF AD biomarkers, and presented discordant values in CSF between Aβ1 - 42 and p-tau (Aβ1 - 42+/p-tau-or Aβ1 - 42-/p-tau+). All of them, underwent an amyloid-PET with 18F-Florbetaben. An extensive neuropsychological testing as part of their diagnostic process (MMSE and TMA-93), was performed, and it was also obtained the Global Deterioration Scale. RESULTS Comparing the discordant CSF results of each patient with the cerebral amyloid-PET results, we found that in the group with Aβ1 - 42+ and p-tau-CSF values, the amyloid-PET was positive in 51.2% and negative in 48.8% of patients, while in the group with Aβ1 - 42-and p-Tau+ CSF values, the amyloid-PET was positive in 52.6% of patients and negative in 47.4% of them. No significant association was found (p = 0.951) between the results of amyloid-PET and the two divergent groups in CSF. CONCLUSIONS No significant relationship was observed between the results of discordant AD biomarkers in CSF and the result of amyloid-PET. No trend in amyloid-PET results was observed in relation to CSF biomarker values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miriam Guerra-Gómez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Emilio Franco-Macías
- Memory Unit, Department of Neurology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - David García-Solís
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weiner MW, Aaronson A, Eichenbaum J, Kwang W, Ashford MT, Gummadi S, Santhakumar J, Camacho MR, Flenniken D, Fockler J, Truran-Sacrey D, Ulbricht A, Mackin RS, Nosheny RL. Brain health registry updates: An online longitudinal neuroscience platform. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:4935-4951. [PMID: 36965096 PMCID: PMC10518371 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote, internet-based methods for recruitment, screening, and longitudinally assessing older adults have the potential to facilitate Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials and observational studies. METHODS The Brain Health Registry (BHR) is an online registry that includes longitudinal assessments including self- and study partner-report questionnaires and neuropsychological tests. New initiatives aim to increase inclusion and engagement of commonly underincluded communities using digital, community-engaged research strategies. New features include multilingual support and biofluid collection capabilities. RESULTS BHR includes > 100,000 participants. BHR has made over 259,000 referrals resulting in 25,997 participants enrolled in 30 aging and AD studies. In addition, 28,278 participants are coenrolled in BHR and other studies with data linkage among studies. Data have been shared with 28 investigators. Recent efforts have facilitated the enrollment and engagement of underincluded ethnocultural communities. DISCUSSION The major advantages of the BHR approach are scalability and accessibility. Challenges include compliance, retention, cohort diversity, and generalizability. HIGHLIGHTS Brain Health Registry (BHR) is an online, longitudinal platform of > 100,000 members. BHR made > 259,000 referrals, which enrolled 25,997 participants in 32 studies. New efforts increased enrollment and engagement of underincluded communities in BHR. The major advantages of the BHR approach are scalability and accessibility. BHR provides a unique adjunct for clinical neuroscience research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W. Weiner
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Neurology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anna Aaronson
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph Eichenbaum
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Winnie Kwang
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Miriam T. Ashford
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shilpa Gummadi
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jessica Santhakumar
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Monica R. Camacho
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Derek Flenniken
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Juliet Fockler
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Diana Truran-Sacrey
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Aaron Ulbricht
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - R. Scott Mackin
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rachel L. Nosheny
- VA Advanced Research Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, San Francisco Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oeckl P, Bluma M, Bucci M, Halbgebauer S, Chiotis K, Sandebring-Matton A, Ashton NJ, Molfetta GD, Grötschel L, Kivipelto M, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Savitcheva I, Nordberg A, Otto M. Blood β-synuclein is related to amyloid PET positivity in memory clinic patients. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:4896-4907. [PMID: 37052206 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION β-synuclein is an emerging blood biomarker to study synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer´s disease (AD), but its relation to amyloid-β (Αβ) pathology is unclear. METHODS We investigated the association of plasma β-synuclein levels with [18F] flutemetamol positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with AD dementia (n = 51), mild cognitive impairment (MCI-Aβ+ n = 18, MCI- Aβ- n = 30), non-AD dementias (n = 22), and non-demented controls (n = 5). RESULTS Plasma β-synuclein levels were higher in Aβ+ (AD dementia, MCI-Aβ+) than in Aβ- subjects (non-AD dementias, MCI-Aβ-) with good discrimination of Aβ+ from Aβ- subjects and prediction of Aβ status in MCI individuals. A positive correlation between plasma β-synuclein and Aβ PET was observed in multiple cortical regions across all lobes. DISCUSSION Plasma β-synuclein demonstrated discriminative properties for Aβ PET positive and negative subjects. Our data underline that β-synuclein is not a direct marker of Aβ pathology and suggest different longitudinal dynamics of synaptic degeneration versus amyloid deposition across the AD continuum. HIGHLIGHTS Blood and CSF β-synuclein levels are higher in Aβ+ than in Aβ- subjects. Blood β-synuclein level correlates with amyloid PET positivity in multiple regions. Blood β-synuclein predicts Aβ status in MCI individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Oeckl
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases e.V. (DZNE), Ulm, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marina Bluma
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Bucci
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Steffen Halbgebauer
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases e.V. (DZNE), Ulm, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Chiotis
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Sandebring-Matton
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Guglielmo Di Molfetta
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Lana Grötschel
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Miia Kivipelto
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
- Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hong Kong, China
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Irina Savitcheva
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
- University Clinic and Polyclinic for Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bollack A, Pemberton HG, Collij LE, Markiewicz P, Cash DM, Farrar G, Barkhof F. Longitudinal amyloid and tau PET imaging in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of methodologies and factors affecting quantification. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:5232-5252. [PMID: 37303269 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Deposition of amyloid and tau pathology can be quantified in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET). Accurate longitudinal measurements of accumulation from these images are critical for characterizing the start and spread of the disease. However, these measurements are challenging; precision and accuracy can be affected substantially by various sources of errors and variability. This review, supported by a systematic search of the literature, summarizes the current design and methodologies of longitudinal PET studies. Intrinsic, biological causes of variability of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) protein load over time are then detailed. Technical factors contributing to longitudinal PET measurement uncertainty are highlighted, followed by suggestions for mitigating these factors, including possible techniques that leverage shared information between serial scans. Controlling for intrinsic variability and reducing measurement uncertainty in longitudinal PET pipelines will provide more accurate and precise markers of disease evolution, improve clinical trial design, and aid therapy response monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Bollack
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK
| | - Hugh G Pemberton
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pawel Markiewicz
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK
| | - David M Cash
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bollack A, Markiewicz PJ, Wink AM, Prosser L, Lilja J, Bourgeat P, Schott JM, Coath W, Collij LE, Pemberton HG, Farrar G, Barkhof F, Cash DM. Evaluation of novel data-driven metrics of amyloid β deposition for longitudinal PET studies. Neuroimage 2023; 280:120313. [PMID: 37595816 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Positron emission tomography (PET) provides in vivo quantification of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. Established methods for assessing Aβ burden can be affected by physiological and technical factors. Novel, data-driven metrics have been developed to account for these sources of variability. We aimed to evaluate the performance of four of these amyloid PET metrics against conventional techniques, using a common set of criteria. METHODS Three cohorts were used for evaluation: Insight 46 (N=464, [18F]florbetapir), AIBL (N=277, [18F]flutemetamol), and an independent test-retest data (N=10, [18F]flutemetamol). Established metrics of amyloid tracer uptake included the Centiloid (CL) and where dynamic data was available, the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND). The four data-driven metrics computed were the amyloid load (Aβ load), the Aβ-PET pathology accumulation index (Aβ index), the Centiloid derived from non-negative matrix factorisation (CLNMF), and the amyloid pattern similarity score (AMPSS). These metrics were evaluated using reliability and repeatability in test-retest data, associations with BPND and CL, variability of the rate of change and sample size estimates to detect a 25% slowing in Aβ accumulation. RESULTS All metrics showed good reliability. Aβ load, Aβ index and CLNMF were strong associated with the BPND. The associations with CL suggest that cross-sectional measures of CLNMF, Aβ index and Aβ load are robust across studies. Sample size estimates for secondary prevention trial scenarios were the lowest for CLNMF and Aβ load compared to the CL. CONCLUSION Among the novel data-driven metrics evaluated, the Aβ load, the Aβ index and the CLNMF can provide comparable performance to more established quantification methods of Aβ PET tracer uptake. The CLNMF and Aβ load could offer a more precise alternative to CL, although further studies in larger cohorts should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK.
| | - Pawel J Markiewicz
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lloyd Prosser
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | | | | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - William Coath
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hugh G Pemberton
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK; GE HealthCare, Amersham, UK; Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK; Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - David M Cash
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bucci M, Bluma M, Savitcheva I, Ashton NJ, Chiotis K, Matton A, Kivipelto M, Di Molfetta G, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Nordberg A. Profiling of plasma biomarkers in the context of memory assessment in a tertiary memory clinic. Transl Psychiatry 2023; 13:268. [PMID: 37491358 PMCID: PMC10368630 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02558-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Plasma biomarkers have shown promising performance in research cohorts in discriminating between different stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies in clinical populations are necessary to provide insights on the clinical utility of plasma biomarkers before their implementation in real-world settings. Here we investigated plasma biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau phosphorylated at 181 and 231 (pTau181, pTau231), amyloid β (Aβ) 42/40 ratio, neurofilament light) in 126 patients (age = 65 ± 8) who were admitted to the Clinic for Cognitive Disorders, at Karolinska University Hospital. After extensive clinical assessment (including CSF analysis), patients were classified as: mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 75), AD (n = 25), non-AD dementia (n = 16), no dementia (n = 9). To refine the diagnosis, patients were examined with [18F]flutemetamol PET (Aβ-PET). Aβ-PET images were visually rated for positivity/negativity and quantified in Centiloid. Accordingly, 68 Aβ+ and 54 Aβ- patients were identified. Plasma biomarkers were measured using single molecule arrays (SIMOA). Receiver-operated curve (ROC) analyses were performed to detect Aβ-PET+ using the different biomarkers. In the whole cohort, the Aβ-PET centiloid values correlated positively with plasma GFAP, pTau231, pTau181, and negatively with Aβ42/40 ratio. While in the whole MCI group, only GFAP was associated with Aβ PET centiloid. In ROC analyses, among the standalone biomarkers, GFAP showed the highest area under the curve discriminating Aβ+ and Aβ- compared to other plasma biomarkers. The combination of plasma biomarkers via regression was the most predictive of Aβ-PET, especially in the MCI group (prior to PET, n = 75) (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 82%, negative predictive value = 100%). In our cohort of memory clinic patients (mainly MCI), the combination of plasma biomarkers was sensitive in ruling out Aβ-PET negative individuals, thus suggesting a potential role as rule-out tool in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bucci
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-14183, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marina Bluma
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-14183, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irina Savitcheva
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University, SE-14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nicholas J Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-43180, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Konstantinos Chiotis
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-14183, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Matton
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-14183, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miia Kivipelto
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-14183, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-14186, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guglielmo Di Molfetta
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-43180, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-43180, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-43180, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-43180, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-43180, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53792, USA
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-14183, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-14186, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee Y, Yoon S, Yoon SH, Kang SW, Jeon S, Kim M, Shin DA, Nam CM, Ye BS. Air pollution is associated with faster cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2023; 10:964-973. [PMID: 37106569 PMCID: PMC10270255 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although chronic exposure to air pollution is associated with an increased risk of dementia in normal elderlies, the effect of chronic exposure to air pollution on the rates of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has not been elucidated. METHODS In this longitudinal study, a total of 269 patients with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia due to AD with the evidence of brain β-amyloid deposition were followed-up for a mean period of 4 years. Five-year normalized hourly cumulative exposure value of each air pollutant, such as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO2 ), and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10 ), was computed based on nationwide air pollution database. The effects of chronic exposure to air pollution on longitudinal cognitive decline rate were evaluated using linear mixed models. RESULTS Higher chronic exposure to SO2 was associated with a faster decline in memory score, whereas chronic exposure to CO, NO2 , and PM10 were not associated with the rate of cognitive decline. Higher chronic exposure to PM2.5 was associated with a faster decline in visuospatial score in apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers. These effects remained significant even after adjusting for potential confounders. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that chronic exposure to SO2 and PM2.5 is associated with faster clinical progression in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young‐gun Lee
- Department of NeurologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
- Department of Neurology, Ilsan Paik HospitalInje University College of MedicineGoyangSouth Korea
| | - Seon‐Jin Yoon
- Department of NeurosurgeryYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - So Hoon Yoon
- Department of NeurologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Sung Woo Kang
- Department of NeurologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Seun Jeon
- Department of NeurologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Minseok Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and ComputingYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Dong Ah Shin
- Department of NeurosurgeryYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Chung Mo Nam
- Department of Biostatistics and ComputingYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
- Department of Preventive MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Byoung Seok Ye
- Department of NeurologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pemberton HG, Buckley C, Battle M, Bollack A, Patel V, Tomova P, Cooke D, Balhorn W, Hegedorn K, Lilja J, Brand C, Farrar G. Software compatibility analysis for quantitative measures of [ 18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET burden in mild cognitive impairment. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:48. [PMID: 37225974 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00994-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology is one of the earliest detectable brain changes in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. In clinical practice, trained readers will visually categorise positron emission tomography (PET) scans as either Aβ positive or negative. However, adjunct quantitative analysis is becoming more widely available, where regulatory approved software can currently generate metrics such as standardised uptake value ratios (SUVr) and individual Z-scores. Therefore, it is of direct value to the imaging community to assess the compatibility of commercially available software packages. In this collaborative project, the compatibility of amyloid PET quantification was investigated across four regulatory approved software packages. In doing so, the intention is to increase visibility and understanding of clinically relevant quantitative methods. METHODS Composite SUVr using the pons as the reference region was generated from [18F]flutemetamol (GE Healthcare) PET in a retrospective cohort of 80 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients (40 each male/female; mean age = 73 years, SD = 8.52). Based on previous autopsy validation work, an Aβ positivity threshold of ≥ 0.6 SUVrpons was applied. Quantitative results from MIM Software's MIMneuro, Syntermed's NeuroQ, Hermes Medical Solutions' BRASS and GE Healthcare's CortexID were analysed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), percentage agreement around the Aβ positivity threshold and kappa scores. RESULTS Using an Aβ positivity threshold of ≥ 0.6 SUVrpons, 95% agreement was achieved across the four software packages. Two patients were narrowly classed as Aβ negative by one software package but positive by the others, and two patients vice versa. All kappa scores around the same Aβ positivity threshold, both combined (Fleiss') and individual software pairings (Cohen's), were ≥ 0.9 signifying "almost perfect" inter-rater reliability. Excellent reliability was found between composite SUVr measurements for all four software packages, with an average measure ICC of 0.97 and 95% confidence interval of 0.957-0.979. Correlation coefficient analysis between the two software packages reporting composite z-scores was strong (r2 = 0.98). CONCLUSION Using an optimised cortical mask, regulatory approved software packages provided highly correlated and reliable quantification of [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET with a ≥ 0.6 SUVrpons positivity threshold. In particular, this work could be of interest to physicians performing routine clinical imaging rather than researchers performing more bespoke image analysis. Similar analysis is encouraged using other reference regions as well as the Centiloid scale, when it has been implemented by more software packages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh G Pemberton
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK.
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Mark Battle
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vrajesh Patel
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Petya Tomova
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Christine Brand
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Gill Farrar
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Soleimani-Meigooni DN, Rabinovici GD. Tau PET Visual Reads: Research and Clinical Applications and Future Directions. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:822-824. [PMID: 37116910 PMCID: PMC10152121 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David N Soleimani-Meigooni
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Landau SM, Ward TJ, Murphy A, Iaccarino L, Harrison TM, La Joie R, Baker S, Koeppe RA, Jagust WJ. Quantification of amyloid beta and tau PET without a structural MRI. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:444-455. [PMID: 35429219 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Relying on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantification of positron emission tomography (PET) images may limit generalizability of the results. We evaluated several MRI-free approaches for amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau PET quantification relative to MRI-dependent quantification cross-sectionally and longitudinally. METHODS We compared baseline MRI-free and MRI-dependent measurements of Aβ PET ([18F]florbetapir [FBP], N = 1290, [18F]florbetaben [FBB], N = 290) and tau PET ([18F]flortaucipir [FTP], N = 768) images with respect to continuous and dichotomous agreement, effect sizes of Aβ+ impaired versus Aβ- unimpaired groups, and longitudinal standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) slopes in a subset of individuals. RESULTS The best-performing MRI-free approaches had high continuous and dichotomous agreement with MRI-dependent SUVRs for Aβ PET and temporal flortaucipir (R2 ≥0.95; ± agreement ≥92%) and for Alzheimer's disease-related effect sizes; agreement was slightly lower for entorhinal flortaucipir and longitudinal slopes. DISCUSSION There is no consistent loss of baseline or longitudinal AD-related signal with MRI-free Aβ and tau PET image quantification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Landau
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Tyler J Ward
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Alice Murphy
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Theresa M Harrison
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Suzanne Baker
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Robert A Koeppe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.,Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Collij LE, Salvadó G, de Wilde A, Altomare D, Shekari M, Gispert JD, Bullich S, Stephens A, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Bouwman F, van der Flier WM. Quantification of [
18
F]florbetaben amyloid‐PET imaging in a mixed memory clinic population: The ABIDE project. Alzheimers Dement 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.12886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lyduine E. Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain
- Clinical Memory Research Unit Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Malmö Sweden
| | - Arno de Wilde
- Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Daniele Altomare
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE) University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
- Memory Center Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona Spain
- Pompeu Fabra University Barcelona Spain
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER‐BBN) Madrid Spain
| | | | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Centre for Medical Image Computing and Queen Square Institute of Neurology UCL London UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pemberton HG, Collij LE, Heeman F, Bollack A, Shekari M, Salvadó G, Alves IL, Garcia DV, Battle M, Buckley C, Stephens AW, Bullich S, Garibotto V, Barkhof F, Gispert JD, Farrar G. Quantification of amyloid PET for future clinical use: a state-of-the-art review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3508-3528. [PMID: 35389071 PMCID: PMC9308604 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05784-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology is one of the earliest detectable brain changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. The overall load and spatial distribution of brain Aβ can be determined in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET), for which three fluorine-18 labelled radiotracers have been approved for clinical use. In clinical practice, trained readers will categorise scans as either Aβ positive or negative, based on visual inspection. Diagnostic decisions are often based on these reads and patient selection for clinical trials is increasingly guided by amyloid status. However, tracer deposition in the grey matter as a function of amyloid load is an inherently continuous process, which is not sufficiently appreciated through binary cut-offs alone. State-of-the-art methods for amyloid PET quantification can generate tracer-independent measures of Aβ burden. Recent research has shown the ability of these quantitative measures to highlight pathological changes at the earliest stages of the AD continuum and generate more sensitive thresholds, as well as improving diagnostic confidence around established binary cut-offs. With the recent FDA approval of aducanumab and more candidate drugs on the horizon, early identification of amyloid burden using quantitative measures is critical for enrolling appropriate subjects to help establish the optimal window for therapeutic intervention and secondary prevention. In addition, quantitative amyloid measurements are used for treatment response monitoring in clinical trials. In clinical settings, large multi-centre studies have shown that amyloid PET results change both diagnosis and patient management and that quantification can accurately predict rates of cognitive decline. Whether these changes in management reflect an improvement in clinical outcomes is yet to be determined and further validation work is required to establish the utility of quantification for supporting treatment endpoint decisions. In this state-of-the-art review, several tools and measures available for amyloid PET quantification are summarised and discussed. Use of these methods is growing both clinically and in the research domain. Concurrently, there is a duty of care to the wider dementia community to increase visibility and understanding of these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh G Pemberton
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK.
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Vallez Garcia
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Battle
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- NIMTLab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Imabayashi E, Tamamura N, Yamaguchi Y, Kamitaka Y, Sakata M, Ishii K. Automated semi-quantitative amyloid PET analysis technique without MR images for Alzheimer's disease. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36:865-875. [PMID: 35821311 PMCID: PMC9515054 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01769-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective Although beta-amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) images are interpreted visually as positive or negative, approximately 10% are judged as equivocal in Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, we aimed to develop an automated semi-quantitative analysis technique using 18F-flutemetamol PET images without anatomical images. Methods Overall, 136 cases of patients administered 18F-flutemetamol were enrolled. Of 136 cases, five PET images each with the highest and lowest values of standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) of cerebral cortex-to-pons were used to create positive and negative templates. Using these templates, PET images of the remaining 126 cases were standardized, and SUVr images were produced with the pons as a reference region. The mean of SUVr values in the volume of interest delineated on the cerebral cortex was compared to those in the CortexID Suite (GE Healthcare). Furthermore, centiloid (CL) values were calculated for the 126 cases using data from the Centiloid Project (http://www.gaain.org/centiloid-project) and both templates. 18F-flutemetamol-PET was interpreted visually as positive/negative based on Aβ deposition in the cortex. However, the criterion "equivocal" was added for cases with focal or mild Aβ accumulation that were difficult to categorize. Optimal cutoff values of SUVr and CL maximizing sensitivity and specificity for Aβ detection were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using the visual evaluation as a standard of truth. Results SUVr calculated by our method and CortexID were highly correlated (R2 = 0.9657). The 126 PET images comprised 84 negative and 42 positive cases of Aβ deposition by visual evaluation, of which 11 and 10 were classified as equivocal, respectively. ROC analyses determined the optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity for SUVr as 0.544, 89.3%, and 92.9%, respectively, and for CL as 12.400, 94.0%, and 92.9%, respectively. Both semi-quantitative analyses showed that 12 and 9 of the 21 equivocal cases were negative and positive, respectively, under the optimal cutoff values. Conclusions This semi-quantitative analysis technique using 18F-flutemetamol-PET calculated SUVr and CL automatically without anatomical images. Moreover, it objectively and homogeneously interpreted positive or negative Aβ burden in the brain as a supplemental tool for the visual reading of equivocal cases in routine clinical practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12149-022-01769-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etsuko Imabayashi
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.,Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, Quantum Life and Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Tamamura
- Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Ltd., 3-4-10 Shinsuna, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 136-0075, Japan
| | - Yuzuho Yamaguchi
- Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Ltd., 3-4-10 Shinsuna, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 136-0075, Japan
| | - Yuto Kamitaka
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Muneyuki Sakata
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishii
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|