1
|
Neufeld NH, Blumberger DM. An Update on the Use of Neuromodulation Strategies in the Treatment of Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2025; 182:332-340. [PMID: 40165555 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20250068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
The field of neuromodulation has evolved tremendously and now includes a vast array of interventions utilizing different technologies that span electrical, magnetic, and ultrasound forms of stimulation. The evolution of interventions holds the promise of fewer adverse effects and a noninvasive approach, increasing the scale at which these interventions may be offered in hospital and community settings. While the majority of neuromodulation studies have focused on patients with mood disorders, predominantly depression, there is an unmet need for patients with schizophrenia, who are in dire need of novel therapeutic options. Advances in neuroimaging and approaches for examining individual variability and transdiagnostic symptoms may lead to more effective neuromodulation treatments in this patient population. This overview explores the modern landscape of invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments for patients with schizophrenia. It begins with approaches that involve diffuse stimulation of the cortex and subcortex and then reviews more focal stimulation approaches at the cortical and subcortical levels. The authors also reflect on the relationship between our understanding of the neurobiology of schizophrenia and neuromodulation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas H Neufeld
- Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Laboratory (Neufeld), Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Neufeld, Blumberger), Schizophrenia Division (Neufeld), and Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention (Neufeld, Blumberger), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto (Neufeld, Blumberger)
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Laboratory (Neufeld), Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Neufeld, Blumberger), Schizophrenia Division (Neufeld), and Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention (Neufeld, Blumberger), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto (Neufeld, Blumberger)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fitzsimmons SMDD, Postma TS, van Campen AD, Vriend C, Batelaan NM, van Oppen P, Hoogendoorn AW, van der Werf YD, van den Heuvel OA. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Plasticity Improving Cognitive Control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Part I: Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes From a Randomized Trial. Biol Psychiatry 2025; 97:678-687. [PMID: 39089567 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The neurobiological mechanisms of rTMS in OCD have been incompletely characterized. We compared clinical outcomes and changes in task-based brain activation following 3 different rTMS protocols, all combined with exposure and response prevention. METHODS In this 3-arm proof-of-concept randomized trial, 61 treatment-refractory adult patients with OCD received 16 sessions of rTMS immediately before exposure and response prevention over 8 weeks, with task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging scans and clinical assessments before and after treatment. Patients received high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]), high-frequency rTMS to the left presupplementary motor area (preSMA) (n = 23 [13 women/10 men]), or control rTMS to the vertex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]). Changes in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging activation before/after treatment were compared using both a Bayesian region of interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach. RESULTS Mean OCD symptom severity decreased significantly in all treatment groups (Δ = -10.836, p < .001, 95% CI -12.504 to -9.168), with no differences between groups. Response rate in the entire sample was 57.4%. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS group showed decreased planning-related activation after treatment that was associated with greater symptom improvement. No group-level activation changes were observed for the preSMA and vertex rTMS groups. Participants in the preSMA group with greater symptom improvement showed decreased error-related activation, and symptom improvement in the vertex group was associated with increased inhibition-related activation. CONCLUSIONS rTMS to preSMA and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with exposure and response prevention led to activation decreases in targeted task networks in individuals showing greater symptom improvement, although we observed no differences in symptom reduction between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M D D Fitzsimmons
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Tjardo S Postma
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Dilene van Campen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chris Vriend
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Compulsivity, Impulsivity & Attention program, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neeltje M Batelaan
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patricia van Oppen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan W Hoogendoorn
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ysbrand D van der Werf
- Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Compulsivity, Impulsivity & Attention program, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Odile A van den Heuvel
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Compulsivity, Impulsivity & Attention program, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee H, Lin F. Identification of Cortical Targets for Modulating Function Supported by the Human Hippocampal Network. Hum Brain Mapp 2025; 46:e70167. [PMID: 40202284 PMCID: PMC11979967 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Individualized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting using functional connectivity analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been demonstrated to be advantageous in inducing neuroplasticity. However, how this approach can benefit modulating the episodic memory function supported by the hippocampal network remains elusive. We use the resting-state fMRI data from a large cohort to reveal tentative TMS targets at cortical regions within the hippocampal network. Functional MRI from 1,133 individuals in the Human Connectome Project was used to analyze the hippocampal network using seed-based functional connectivity. Using a weighted sum of time series at the cortex, we identified the average centroids of individualized targets at the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior parietal cortices (PPCs) at (-10, 49, 7) and (-40, -67, 30) in the left hemisphere, respectively. The mPFC and PPC coordinate at the right hemispheres are (11, 51, 6) and (48, -59, 24) in the right hemisphere, respectively. Centroids of the individualized functional connectivity at the mPFC and PPC were reproducible between sessions with separations in average about 2 and 4 mm, respectively. These separations were significantly smaller than the distance to average functional connectivity centroids (~10 mm) and atlas coordinate (~20 mm). These coordinates can be reliably identified (> 90% of individuals) using cortical "seedmaps." Our results suggest candidate TMS target coordinates to modulate the hippocampal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin‐Ju Lee
- Sunnybrook Research InstituteTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Fa‐Hsuan Lin
- Sunnybrook Research InstituteTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Su CW, Tang Y, Tang NL, Liu N, Li JW, Qi S, Wang HN, Huang ZG. Unveiling the dynamic effects of major depressive disorder and its rTMS interventions through energy landscape analysis. Front Neurosci 2025; 19:1444999. [PMID: 40109660 PMCID: PMC11920141 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1444999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction Brain dynamics offer a more direct insight into brain function than network structure, providing a profound understanding of dysregulation and control mechanisms within intricate brain systems. This study investigates the dynamics of functional brain networks in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients to decipher the mechanisms underlying brain dysfunction during depression and assess the impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intervention. Methods We employed energy landscape analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to examine the dynamics of functional brain networks in MDD patients. The analysis focused on key dynamical indicators of the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), and the central execution network (CEN). The effects of rTMS intervention on these networks were also evaluated. Results Our findings revealed notable dynamical alterations in the pDMN, the vDMN, and the aSN, suggesting their potential as diagnostic and therapeutic markers. Particularly striking was the altered activity observed in the dDMN in the MDD group, indicative of patterns associated with depressive rumination. Notably, rTMS intervention partially reverses the identified dynamical alterations. Discussion Our results shed light on the intrinsic dysfunction mechanisms of MDD from a dynamic standpoint and highlight the effects of rTMS intervention. The identified alterations in brain network dynamics provide promising analytical markers for the diagnosis and treatment of MDD. Future studies should further explore the clinical applications of these markers and the comprehensive dynamical effects of rTMS intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Wang Su
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Research Center for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yurui Tang
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Nai-Long Tang
- Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Psychiatry, The 907th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Nanping, Fujian, China
| | - Nian Liu
- Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Psychiatry, The 904th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jing-Wen Li
- Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shun Qi
- Research Center for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hua-Ning Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zi-Gang Huang
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Research Center for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Duprat RJ, Linn KA, Satterthwaite TD, Sheline YI, Liang X, Bagdon G, Flounders MW, Robinson H, Platt M, Kable J, Long H, Scully M, Deluisi JA, Thase M, Cristancho M, Grier J, Blaine C, Figueroa-González A, Oathes DJ. Resting fMRI-guided TMS evokes subgenual anterior cingulate response in depression. Neuroimage 2025; 305:120963. [PMID: 39638081 PMCID: PMC11887861 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression alleviation following treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) tends to be more effective when TMS is targeted to cortical areas with high (negative) resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) with the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC). However, the relationship between sgACC-cortex rsFC and the TMS-evoked response in the sgACC is still being explored and has not yet been established in depressed patients. OBJECTIVES In this study, we investigated the relationship between sgACC-cortical (site of stimulation) rsFC and induced evoked responses in the sgACC in healthy controls and depressed patients. METHODS For each participant (N = 115, 34 depressed patients), a peak rsFC cortical 'hotspot' for the sgACC and control targets were identified at baseline. Single pulses of TMS interleaved with fMRI readouts were administered to these targets to evoke downstream fMRI blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the sgACC. Generalized estimating equations were used to investigate the association between TMS-evoked BOLD responses in the sgACC and rsFC between the stimulation site and the sgACC. RESULTS Stimulations over cortical sites with high rsFC to the sgACC were effective in modulating activity in the sgACC in both healthy controls and depressed patients. Moreover, we found that in depressed patients, sgACC rsFC at the site of stimulation was associated with the induced evoked response amplitude in the sgACC: stronger positive rsFC values leading to stronger evoked responses in the sgACC. CONCLUSIONS rsFC-based targeting is a viable strategy to causally modulate the sgACC. Assuming an anti-depressive mechanism working through modulation of the sgACC, the field's exclusive focus on sites anticorrelated with the sgACC for treating depression should be broadened to explore positively-connected sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain J Duprat
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kristin A Linn
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; The Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yvette I Sheline
- Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ximo Liang
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gabriela Bagdon
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew W Flounders
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Heather Robinson
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Platt
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Marketing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Kable
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hannah Long
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Morgan Scully
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph A Deluisi
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Thase
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mario Cristancho
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julie Grier
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Camille Blaine
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Almaris Figueroa-González
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Desmond J Oathes
- Center for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, USA; Center for the Neuromodulation of Depression and Stress, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Penn Brain Science, Translation, Innovation, and Modulation Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang L, Hu W, Wang H, Song Z, Lin H, Jiang J. Different stimulation targets of rTMS modulate specific triple-network and hippocampal-cortex functional connectivity. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:1256-1264. [PMID: 39515419 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely applied to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD). Various treatment targets are currently being explored in clinical research. However, target diversity can result in considerable heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate whether different rTMS targets can enhance cognitive domains by modulating functional connectivity (FC) of the hippocampus (HIP) and triple network, which comprises the salience network (SN), central executive network (CEN), and default mode network (DMN). METHODS We enrolled 63 patients with AD, of whom 48 and 15 underwent rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and the bilateral angular gyrus (ANG), respectively. We examined the network-level FC differences within the triple-network before and after treatment. Additionally, we utilized HIP as a seed for voxel-level analysis. We compared the similarities and differences in the effects of dlPFC and ANG rTMS. RESULTS rTMS targeting the dlPFC primarily influenced the FC of the CEN, whereas rTMS targeting the ANG primarily influenced the SN and DMN. Moreover, the right temporal lobe within the DMN exhibited reduced FC with the left HIP following both therapies. The results of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis indicated that hippocampal-cortex FC played a dominant role in the therapeutic effect. The observed FC changes significantly correlated with improvements in multiple cognitive scales. CONCLUSION rTMS targeting different regions affected the FC of specific networks. Both stimulation targets modulate the FC of hippocampal-cortex to influence therapeutic outcomes. Classification of patients based on damaged networks can further inform subsequent treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luyao Wang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
| | - Wenjing Hu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
| | - Huanxin Wang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
| | - Ziyan Song
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
| | - Hua Lin
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | - Jiehui Jiang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu H, Wu M, Huang H, Chen X, Zeng P, Xu Y. Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognition function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 101:102508. [PMID: 39303877 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a critical time window for implementing prevention strategies to attenuate or delay cognitive decline. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are promising non-pharmacological therapies for improving the cognitive function of MCI, but it is unclear which type of NIBS protocol is most effective. This study aimed to compare and rank the beneficial effect of different NIBS methods/protocols on cognitive function and examine the acceptability of NIBS in patients with MCI. METHODS Electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chongqing VIP Database up to November 2023. Patients with diagnosis of MCI were included. The primary outcomes were acceptability and pre-post treatment changes in global cognitive function, and the secondary outcomes were specific cognitive domains (language and executive function). All network meta‑analysis procedures were performed under the frequentist model. A protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023441448). RESULTS A network meta-analysis was conducted on 19 eligible RCTs consisting of 599 subjects. Compared with the sham stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3F4) showed the strongest improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.52[95 %CIs =0.49-2.56]), followed by rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3) (SMD =1.25[95 %CIs =0.57-1.93]); Moreover, rTMS-F3F4 showed more significant efficacy in language function (SMD =0.96[95 %CIs = 0.20-1.72]); No statistically significant differences were found among the other cognitive domains. Compared with the rTMS-F4, rTMS-F3F4 showed a stronger improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.80[95 %CIs =0.02-3.59]). Similar results were obtained in subgroup analyses of cognitive function. All the methods were well-tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION The present findings provide evidence of the benefits of NIBS, especially TMS stimulating the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for the beneficial effect on cognitive and language function in patients with MCI. However, because few studies were available for inclusion, additional well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted to support exploring longer-term dynamic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Mengyuan Wu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Haoyu Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaolin Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Dongguan Songshan Lake Tungwah Hospital, DongGuan, China
| | - Peiling Zeng
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ying Xu
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kiyonaga A, Miller JA, D'Esposito M. Lateral prefrontal cortex controls interplay between working memory and actions. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.09.17.613601. [PMID: 39345454 PMCID: PMC11429898 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.17.613601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Humans must often keep multiple task goals in mind, at different levels of priority and immediacy, while also interacting with the environment. We might need to remember information for an upcoming task while engaged in more immediate actions. Consequently, actively maintained working memory (WM) content may bleed into ongoing but unrelated motor behavior. Here, we experimentally test the impact of WM maintenance on action execution, and we transcranially stimulate lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) to parse its functional contributions to WM-motor interactions. We first created a task scenario wherein human participants (both sexes) executed cued hand movements during WM maintenance. We manipulated the compatibility between WM and movement goals at the trial level and the statistical likelihood that the two would be compatible at the block level. We found that remembering directional words (e.g., 'left', 'down') biased the trajectory and speed of hand movements that occurred during the WM delay, but the bias was dampened in blocks when WM content predictably conflicted with movement goals. Then we targeted left lateral PFC with two different transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols before participants completed the task. We found that an intermittent theta-burst protocol, which is thought to be excitatory, dampened sensitivity to block-level control demands (i.e., proactive control), while a continuous theta-burst protocol, which is thought to be inhibitory, dampened adaptation to trial-by-trial conflict (i.e., reactive control). Therefore, lateral PFC is involved in controlling the interplay between WM content and manual action, but different PFC mechanisms may support different time-scales of adaptive control.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang KY, Tik M, Mizutani-Tiebel Y, Taylor P, van Hattem T, Falkai P, Padberg F, Bulubas L, Keeser D. Dose-Dependent Target Engagement of a Clinical Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Protocol: An Interleaved Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Healthy People. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2024:S2451-9022(24)00244-1. [PMID: 39182723 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely applied as a therapeutic intervention in mental health; however, the understanding of its mechanisms is still incomplete. Prior magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have mainly used offline iTBS or short sequences in concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-functional MRI (fMRI). This study investigated a full 600-stimuli iTBS protocol using interleaved TMS-fMRI in comparison with 2 control conditions in healthy subjects. METHODS In a crossover design, 18 participants underwent 3 sessions of interleaved iTBS-fMRI: 1) the left DLPFC at 40% resting motor threshold (rMT) intensity, 2) the left DLPFC at 80% rMT intensity, and 3) the left primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% rMT intensity. We compared immediate blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses during interleaved iTBS-fMRI across these conditions including correlations between individual fMRI BOLD activation and iTBS-induced electric field strength at the target sites. RESULTS Whole-brain analysis showed increased activation in several regions following iTBS. Specifically, the left DLPFC, as well as the bilateral M1, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula, showed increased activation during 80% rMT left DLPFC stimulation. Increased BOLD activity in the left DLPFC was observed with neither 40% rMT left DLPFC stimulation nor left M1 80% rMT iTBS, whereas activation in other regions was found to overlap between conditions. Of note, BOLD activation and electric field intensities were only correlated for M1 stimulation and not for the DLPFC conditions. CONCLUSIONS This interleaved TMS-fMRI study showed dosage- and target-specific BOLD activation during a 600-stimuli iTBS protocol in healthy individuals. Future studies may use our approach for investigating target engagement in clinical samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Yen Chang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany
| | - Martin Tik
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Brain Stimulation Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany
| | - Paul Taylor
- Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo van Hattem
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Lucia Bulubas
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Keeser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Center for Mental Health, Partner Site Munich-Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ballester J, Marchand WR, Philip NS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for methamphetamine use disorder: A scoping review within the neurocircuitry model of addiction. Psychiatry Res 2024; 338:115995. [PMID: 38852478 PMCID: PMC11209858 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
The use of methamphetamine in the United States is increasing, contributing now to the "fourth wave" in the national opioid epidemic crisis. People who suffer from methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) have a higher risk of death. No pharmacological interventions are approved by the FDA and psychosocial interventions are only moderately effective. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a relatively novel FDA-cleared intervention for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and other neuropsychiatric conditions. Several lines of research suggest that TMS could be useful for the treatment of addictive disorders, including MUD. We will review those published clinical trials that show potential effects on craving reduction of TMS when applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) also highlighting some limitations that affect their generalizability and applicability. We propose the use of the Koob and Volkow's neurocircuitry model of addiction as a frame to explain the brain effects of TMS in patients with MUD. We will finally discuss new venues that could lead to a more individualized and effective treatment of this complex disorder including the use of neuroimaging, the exploration of different areas of the brain such as the frontopolar cortex or the salience network and the use of biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ballester
- Substance Abuse Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Program, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 501 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
| | - W R Marchand
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 501 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; VISN-19 Whole Health Flagship Site, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA; Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, 4815 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA
| | - N S Philip
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chang KY, Tik M, Mizutani-Tiebel Y, Schuler AL, Taylor P, Campana M, Vogelmann U, Huber B, Dechantsreiter E, Thielscher A, Bulubas L, Padberg F, Keeser D. Neural response during prefrontal theta burst stimulation: Interleaved TMS-fMRI of full iTBS protocols. Neuroimage 2024; 291:120596. [PMID: 38554783 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) has emerged as a safe and effective transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment protocol in depression. Though network effects after iTBS have been widely studied, the deeper mechanistic understanding of target engagement is still at its beginning. Here, we investigate the feasibility of a novel integrated TMS-fMRI setup and accelerated echo planar imaging protocol to directly observe the immediate effects of full iTBS treatment sessions. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS In our effort to explore interleaved iTBS-fMRI feasibility, we hypothesize that TMS will induce acute BOLD signal changes in both the stimulated area and interconnected neural regions. METHODS Concurrent TMS-fMRI with full sessions of neuronavigated iTBS (i.e. 600 pulses) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was investigated in 18 healthy participants. In addition, we conducted four TMS-fMRI sessions in a single patient on long-term maintenance iTBS for bipolar depression to test the transfer to clinical cases. RESULTS Concurrent TMS-fMRI was feasible for iTBS sequences with 600 pulses. During interleaved iTBS-fMRI, an increase of the BOLD signal was observed in a network including bilateral DLPFC regions. In the clinical case, a reduced BOLD response was found in the left DLPFC and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, with high variability across individual sessions. CONCLUSIONS Full iTBS sessions as applied for the treatment of depressive disorders can be established in the interleaved iTBS-fMRI paradigm. In the future, this experimental approach could be valuable in clinical samples, for demonstrating target engagement by iTBS protocols and investigating their mechanisms of therapeutic action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Yen Chang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Tik
- High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Brain Stimulation Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
| | - Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna-Lisa Schuler
- Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paul Taylor
- Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mattia Campana
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Vogelmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Huber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Esther Dechantsreiter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Thielscher
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Lucia Bulubas
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Keeser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Siddiqi SH, Fox MD. Targeting Symptom-Specific Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:502-509. [PMID: 37979642 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that the clinical effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation are target dependent. Within any given symptom, precise targeting of specific brain circuits may improve clinical outcomes. This principle can also be extended across symptoms-stimulation of different circuits may lead to different symptom-level outcomes. This may include targeting different symptoms within the same disorder (such as dysphoria vs. anxiety in patients with major depression) or targeting the same symptom across different disorders (such as primary major depression and depression secondary to stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease). Some of these symptom-specific changes may be desirable, while others may be undesirable. This review focuses on the conceptual framework through which symptom-specific target circuits may be identified, tested, and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Michael D Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cole E, O'Sullivan SJ, Tik M, Williams NR. Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation: Safety, Efficacy, and Future Advancements. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:523-535. [PMID: 38383091 PMCID: PMC10952126 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can be used to modulate neural networks underlying psychiatric and neurological disorders. TBS can be delivered intermittently or continuously. The conventional intermittent TBS protocol is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat otherwise treatment-resistant depression, but the 6-week duration limits the applicability of this therapy. Accelerated TBS protocols present an opportunity to deliver higher pulse doses in shorter periods of time, thus resulting in faster and potentially more clinically effective treatment. However, the acceleration of TBS delivery raises questions regarding the relative safety, efficacy, and durability compared with conventional TBS protocols. In this review paper, we present the data from accelerated TBS trials to date that support the safety and effectiveness of accelerated protocols while acknowledging the need for more durability data. We discuss the stimulation parameters that seem to be important for the efficacy of accelerated TBS protocols and possible avenues for further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Cole
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sean J O'Sullivan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell School of Medicine, Austin, Texas
| | - Martin Tik
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nolan R Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhu Y, Liao L, Gao S, Tao Y, Huang H, Fang X, Yuan C, Gao C. Neuroprotective effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Alzheimer's disease: Undetermined therapeutic protocols and mechanisms. NEUROPROTECTION 2024; 2:16-32. [DOI: 10.1002/nep3.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
AbstractAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by gradual deterioration of cognitive functions, for which an effective treatment is currently unavailable. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a well‐established noninvasive brain stimulation method, is utilized in clinical settings to address various neuropsychiatric conditions, such as depression, neuropathic pain, and poststroke dysfunction. Increasing evidence suggests that rTMS may enhance cognitive abilities in individuals with AD. However, its optimal therapeutic protocols and precise mechanisms are currently unknown, impeding its clinical implementation. In the present review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the efficacy‐related parameters in rTMS treatment, encompassing stimulus frequency, stimulus pattern, stimulus intensity, and the configuration of the stimulus coil. Furthermore, we reviewed promising rTMS therapeutic protocols involving various combinations of these factors, that were examined in clinical studies. Based on our analysis, we propose that a multisite high‐frequency rTMS (HF‐rTMS) regimen has value in AD therapy, and that promising single‐site protocols, such as HF‐rTMS, applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, or cerebellum are required to be validated in larger clinical studies. Lastly, we provide a comprehensive review of the potential mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of rTMS on cognition in AD in terms of brain network modulation as well as cellular and molecular reactions. In conclusion, the interaction of diverse mechanisms may be responsible for the total therapeutic effect of rTMS on AD. This review provides theoretical and practical evidence for the future clinical application and scientific research of rTMS in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zhu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Lingyi Liao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Shihao Gao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yong Tao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Hao Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA Guangzhou China
| | - Xiangqin Fang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Changyan Yuan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Changyue Gao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Downar J, Siddiqi SH, Mitra A, Williams N, Liston C. Mechanisms of Action of TMS in the Treatment of Depression. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2024; 66:233-277. [PMID: 38844713 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2024_483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2024]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is entering increasingly widespread use in treating depression. The most common stimulation target, in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), emerged from early neuroimaging studies in depression. Recently, more rigorous casual methods have revealed whole-brain target networks and anti-networks based on the effects of focal brain lesions and focal brain stimulation on depression symptoms. Symptom improvement during therapeutic DLPFC-TMS appears to involve directional changes in signaling between the DLPFC, subgenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and salience-network regions. However, different networks may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms for other TMS targets in depression, such as dorsomedial prefrontal cortex or orbitofrontal cortex. The durability of therapeutic effects for TMS involves synaptic neuroplasticity, and specifically may depend upon dopamine acting at the D1 receptor family, as well as NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity mechanisms. Although TMS protocols are classically considered 'excitatory' or 'inhibitory', the actual effects in individuals appear quite variable, and might be better understood at the level of populations of synapses rather than individual synapses. Synaptic meta-plasticity may provide a built-in protective mechanism to avoid runaway facilitation or inhibition during treatment, and may account for the relatively small number of patients who worsen rather than improve with TMS. From an ethological perspective, the antidepressant effects of TMS may involve promoting a whole-brain attractor state associated with foraging/hunting behaviors, centered on the rostrolateral periaqueductal gray and salience network, and suppressing an attractor state associated with passive threat defense, centered on the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray and default-mode network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Downar
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anish Mitra
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nolan Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Conor Liston
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fitzsimmons SMDD, Postma T, van Campen AD, Vriend C, Batelaan NM, van Oppen P, Hoogendoorn AW, van der Werf YD, van den Heuvel OA. TMS-induced plasticity improving cognitive control in OCD I: Clinical and neuroimaging outcomes from a randomised trial of rTMS for OCD. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.04.23298100. [PMID: 37961433 PMCID: PMC10635261 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.04.23298100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment option for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The neurobiological mechanisms of rTMS in OCD have, however, been incompletely characterized. We compared clinical outcomes and changes in task-based brain activation following three different rTMS stimulation protocols, all combined with exposure and response prevention (ERP). Methods In this three-arm proof-of-concept randomized controlled clinical trial, 61 treatment-refractory adult OCD patients received 16 sessions of rTMS immediately prior to ERP over 8 weeks, with task-based functional MRI (tb-fMRI) scans and clinical assessments pre- and post-treatment. Patients received either: high frequency (HF) rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (n=19 (6M/13F)); HF rTMS to the left pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) (n=23 (10M/13F)); or control rTMS to the vertex (n=19 (6M/13F)). Changes in tb-fMRI activation pre-post treatment were compared using both a Bayesian region-of-interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach. Results Mean OCD symptom severity decreased significantly in all treatment groups (delta=- 10.836, p<0.001, 95% CI [-12.504, -9.168]), with no differences between groups. Response rate in the entire sample was 57.4%. Groups receiving DLPFC or preSMA rTMS showed, respectively, a decrease in planning and error processing task-related activation after treatment that was associated with symptom improvement, while individuals in the vertex rTMS group with greater symptom improvement showed an increase in inhibition-related activation. Conclusions PreSMA and DLPFC rTMS combined with ERP led to significant symptom improvement related to activation decreases in targeted task networks, although we observed no differences in symptom reduction between groups. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03667807 ).
Collapse
|