Behavioral sensitization to ethanol is modulated by environmental conditions, but is not associated with cross-sensitization to allopregnanolone or pentobarbital in DBA/2J mice

Does tolerance to ethanol-induced ataxia explain the sensitized response to ethanol?

Under conditions of repeated exposure to ethanol, a sensitized locomotor stimulant response develops in some strains of mice. It has been hypothesized that the sensitized response is a consequence of tolerance development to the sedative/incoordinating effects of ethanol. Conversely, ethanol-induced sensitization and tolerance may be independent effects of repeated ethanol exposure. A published study in C57BL/6J by DBA/2J recombinant inbred strains concluded that the two phenomena are not genetically related and thus perhaps mechanistically distinct. To extend evaluation beyond the genetic variance found in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice and examine phenotypic associations, we simultaneously measured ethanol-induced sensitization and tolerance in a genetically diverse panel of 15 standard inbred mouse strains and a genetically heterogeneous stock that was produced by the intercrossing of eight inbred mouse strains. Changes in activity counts and ataxia ratio across repeated ethanol treatments indexed sensitization and tolerance, respectively. Photocell beam breaks provided the measure of activity, and foot slip errors corrected for activity in a grid test provided a measure of coordination. The results were strain and individual dependent. The genetic correlation between magnitude of sensitization and tolerance was not significant in the panel of inbred strains, but when individual data were correlated, without regard to strain, there was a significant correlation. This relationship was also significant in the genetically heterogeneous population of mice. However, magnitude of tolerance explained only 10% of the variance in sensitization among individuals of the inbred strain population, whereas it explained 44% of the variance among individuals of the eight-strain cross. When repeated exposures to ethanol were disassociated from the test apparatus, this relationship in the eight-strain cross disappeared. Furthermore, days to peak sensitization and tolerance across days did not perfectly mirror each other. Overall, our data do not support shared genetic mechanisms in sensitization and tolerance development but suggest a partial relationship among individuals that could be related to drug-environment associations.

Differential effects of context on psychomotor sensitization to ethanol and cocaine

Repeated drug injections lead to sensitization of their stimulant effects in mice, a phenomenon sometimes referred to as drug psychomotor sensitization. Previous studies showed that sensitization to cocaine is context dependent as its expression is reduced in an environment that was not paired with cocaine administration. In contrast, the effects of the test context on ethanol sensitization remain unclear. In the present study, female OF1 mice were repeatedly injected with 1.5 g/kg ethanol to test for both the effects of context novelty/familiarity and association on ethanol sensitization. A first group of mice was extensively pre-exposed to the test context before ethanol sensitization and ethanol injections were paired with the test context (familiar and paired group). A second group was not pre-exposed to the test context, but ethanol injections were paired with the test context (nonfamiliar and paired group). Finally, a third group of mice was not pre-exposed to the test context and ethanol was repeatedly injected in the home cage (unpaired group). Control groups were similarly exposed to the test context, but were injected with saline. In a second experiment, cocaine was used as a positive control. The same behavioral procedure was used, except that mice were injected with 10 mg/kg cocaine instead of ethanol. The results show a differential involvement of the test context in the sensitization to ethanol and cocaine. Cocaine sensitization is strongly context dependent and is not expressed in the unpaired group. In contrast, the expression of ethanol sensitization is independent of the context in which it was administered, but is strongly affected by the relative novelty/familiarity of the environment. Extensive pre-exposure to the test context prevented the expression of ethanol sensitization. One possible explanation is that expression of ethanol sensitization requires an arousing environment.

Effects of nicotine on ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization: A model of neuroadaptation

Co-morbid use of nicotine-containing tobacco products and alcohol (ethanol) is prevalent in young adults initiating use and in alcohol dependent adults, suggesting that these drugs in combination may increase risk to develop dependence on one or both drugs. Neuroadaptations caused by repeated drug exposure are related to the development of drug dependence and vulnerability to relapse. Locomotor sensitization has been used as a behavioral measure used to detect changes in neural drug sensitivity that are thought to contribute to drug dependence and relapse. Locomotor sensitization was measured in the current studies to examine potential differences in the effects of nicotine and ethanol given alone and in combination. Baseline activity levels of DBA/2J mice were assessed on 2 days, then mice were treated for 10 days with saline, nicotine (1 or 2mg/kg of nicotine tartrate), ethanol (1 or 2g/kg), or nicotine plus ethanol and locomotor activity was assessed every third day. On the following day, all mice were challenged with ethanol to measure the expression of sensitization. Mice treated with both nicotine and ethanol exhibited greater stimulation than predicted from the combined independent effects of these drugs, consistent with our previously published results. The combined effects of nicotine and ethanol on locomotor sensitization were dependent on the dose of ethanol and whether testing was performed after the drugs were given together, or after challenge with ethanol alone. These results suggest that nicotine and ethanol in combination can have neuroadaptive effects that differ from the independent effects of these drugs.

Nicotine enhances the locomotor stimulating but not the conditioned rewarding effect of ethanol in DBA/2J mice

BACKGROUND

One hypothesis to explain the high rate of nicotine and alcohol (ethanol [EtOH]) co-abuse is that these drugs have enhanced rewarding effects when taken together. The goal of this work was to use the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure to determine whether nicotine would enhance the development of EtOH-induced CPP.

METHODS

The conditioned rewarding effects of nicotine (1 or 2 mg/kg of nicotine tartrate), EtOH (1 g/kg), and nicotine plus EtOH in combination were assessed using a well-established CPP procedure chosen specifically for examining alterations in the development of EtOH-induced CPP by nicotine. In addition, the reference dose procedure was used to directly compare the conditioned rewarding effect of EtOH versus nicotine plus EtOH. DBA/2J mice were used because they are an inbred strain that has repeatedly been shown to develop CPP to EtOH.

RESULTS

Neither dose of nicotine alone produced CPP, whereas EtOH did, using the standard EtOH CPP procedure. The magnitude of EtOH-induced CPP was not affected by co-administration of 1 mg/kg nicotine, but 2 mg/kg nicotine interfered with the development of EtOH-induced CPP. Using the reference dose procedure, there was no significant preference or aversion for either nicotine + EtOH dose combination versus EtOH alone. However, combined nicotine and EtOH had a larger effect on locomotor activity, during the conditioning trials, compared to their additive effect when given alone, consistent with previous data.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not support the hypothesis that nicotine enhances the conditioned rewarding effect of EtOH. This finding differs from the combined locomotor stimulant effects of nicotine and EtOH that were observed in this study and in our previously published work, and suggests that combined stimulant effects of nicotine and EtOH do not predict enhanced reward.

Effects of varenicline on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, locomotor stimulation, and sensitization

BACKGROUND

Varenicline, a partial nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist, is a promising new drug for the treatment of alcohol (ethanol [EtOH]) dependence. Varenicline has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a smoking cessation therapeutic and has also been found to reduce EtOH consumption in humans and animal models of alcohol use. These studies examined the hypotheses that varenicline attenuates the stimulant and sensitizing effects of EtOH and reduces the motivational effects of EtOH-associated cues. The goal was to determine whether these effects of varenicline contribute to its pharmacotherapeutic effects for alcohol dependence. In addition, effects of varenicline on acute stimulation and/or on the acquisition of sensitization would suggest a role for nAChR involvement in these effects of EtOH.

METHODS

Dose-dependent effects of varenicline on the expression of EtOH-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), locomotor activation, and behavioral sensitization were examined. These measures model motivational effects of EtOH-associated cues, euphoric or stimulatory effects of EtOH, and EtOH-induced neuroadaptation. All studies used DBA/2J mice, an inbred strain with high sensitivity to these EtOH-related effects.

RESULTS

Varenicline did not significantly attenuate the expression of EtOH-induced CPP. Varenicline reduced locomotor activity and had the most pronounced effect in the presence of EtOH, with the largest effect on acute EtOH-induced locomotor stimulation and a trend for varenicline to attenuate the expression of EtOH-induced sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Because varenicline did not attenuate the expression of EtOH-induced CPP, it may not be effective at reducing the motivational effects of EtOH-associated cues. This outcome suggests that reductions in the motivational effects of EtOH-associated cues may not be involved in how varenicline reduces EtOH consumption. However, varenicline did have effects on locomotor behavior and significantly attenuated acute EtOH-induced locomotor stimulation. In humans who drink while taking varenicline, it might similarly reduce stimulant responses and have an impact on continued drinking. General sedative effects in such individuals should be carefully considered.

Acute and chronic ethanol differentially modify the emotional significance of a novel environment: implications for addiction

Using open-field behaviour as an experimental paradigm, we demonstrated a complex interaction between the rewarding/stimulating effects and the anxiogenic/stressful effects of both novelty and acute or chronic amphetamine in mice. As a consequence of this interaction, acute amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion was inhibited, whereas the expression of its sensitization was facilitated in a novel environment. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the interactions between exposure to a novel environment and the acute and chronic effects of ethanol (Eth), a drug of abuse known to produce anxiolytic-like behaviour in mice. Previously habituated and non-habituated male Swiss mice (3 months old) were tested in an open field after receiving an acute injection of Eth or following repeated treatment with Eth. Acute Eth administration increased locomotion with a greater magnitude in mice exposed to the apparatus for the first time, and this was thought to be related to the attenuation of the stressful effects of novelty produced by the anxiolytic-like effect of acute Eth, leading to a subsequent prevalence of its stimulant effects. However, locomotor sensitization produced by repeated Eth administration was expressed only in the previously explored environment. This result might be related to the well-known tolerance of Eth-induced anxiolytic-like behaviour following repeated treatment, which would restore the anxiogenic effect of novelty. Our data suggest that a complex and plastic interaction between the emotional and motivational properties of novelty and drugs of abuse can critically modify the behavioural expression of addiction-related mechanisms.

Locomotor sensitization to EtOH: contribution of β-Endorphin

Alcohol use disorders, like all drug addictions, involve a constellation of adaptive changes throughout the brain. Neural activity underlying changes in the rewarding properties of alcohol reflect changes in dopamine transmission in mesolimbic and nigrostriatal pathways and these effects are modulated by endogenous opioids such as β-Endorphin. In order to study the role of β-Endorphin in the development of locomotor sensitization to repeated EtOH exposure, we tested transgenic mice that vary in their capacity to synthesize this peptide as a result of constitutive modification of the Pomc gene. Our results indicate that mice deficient in β-Endorphin show attenuated locomotor activation following an acute injection of EtOH (2.0 g/kg) and, in contrast to wildtype mice, fail to demonstrate locomotor sensitization after 12 days of repeated EtOH injections. These data support the idea that β-Endorphin modulates the locomotor effects of EtOH and contributes to the neuroadaptive changes associated with chronic use.

Environmental enrichment blocks ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization and decreases BDNF levels in the prefrontal cortex in mice

The use of addictive drugs can lead to long-term neuroplastic changes in the brain, including behavioral sensitization, a phenomenon related to addiction. Environmental enrichment (EE) is a strategy used to study the effect of environment on the response to several manipulations, including treatment with addictive drugs. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been associated with behaviors related to ethanol addiction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of EE on ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization and BDNF expression. Mice were exposed to EE and then repeatedly treated with a low dose (1.8 g/kg) of ethanol. Another group of mice was first subjected to repeated ethanol treatment according to the behavioral sensitization protocol and then exposed to EE. Environmental enrichment prevented the development of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization and blocked behavioral sensitization in sensitized mice. Both repeated ethanol and EE decreased BDNF levels in the prefrontal cortex but not in the hippocampus. However, BDNF levels were lower in ethanol-treated mice exposed to EE. These findings suggest that EE can act on the mechanisms implicated in behavioral sensitization, a model for drug-induced neuroplasticity and relapse. Additionally, EE alters BDNF levels, which regulate addiction-related behaviors.

Role of corticotropin-releasing factor and corticosterone in behavioral sensitization to ethanol

Neuroadaptations underlying sensitization to drugs of abuse seem to influence compulsive drug pursuit and relapse associated with addiction. Our previous data support a role for the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) type-1 receptor (CRF₁) in ethanol (EtOH)-induced psychomotor sensitization. CRF₁ is endogenously activated by CRF and urocortin-1. Because genetic deletion of urocortin-1 did not affect EtOH sensitization, we hypothesized that CRF is the important ligand underlying EtOH sensitization. To test this hypothesis, we used heterozygous and homozygous knockout (KO) mice, which lack one or both copies of the gene coding for CRF, and their respective wild-type controls. EtOH sensitization was normal in heterozygous, but absent in homozygous, CRF KO mice. Corticosterone (CORT) levels were drastically reduced only in CRF KO mice. Because CRF/CRF₁ initiate EtOH-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, we investigated CORT effects on EtOH sensitization. The CORT synthesis inhibitor metyrapone prevented the acquisition, but not the expression, of EtOH sensitization. Exogenous CORT administration sensitized the locomotor response to a subsequent EtOH challenge; we observed, however, that the exogenous CORT levels necessary to induce sensitization to EtOH were significantly higher than those produced by EtOH treatment. Therefore, participation of CORT seems to be necessary, but not sufficient, to explain the role of CRF/CRF₁ in the acquisition of sensitization to EtOH. Extra-hypothalamic CRF/CRF₁ mechanisms are suggested to be involved in the expression of EtOH sensitization. The present results are consistent with current theories proposing a key role for CRF and CRF₁ in drug-induced neuroplasticity, dependence, and addictive behavior.

Ethanol drinking-in-the-dark facilitates behavioral sensitization to ethanol in C57BL/6J, BALB/cByJ, but not in mu-opioid receptor deficient CXBK mice

BACKGROUND

Neuroplasticity associated with drug-induced behavioral sensitization has been associated with excessive drug pursuit and consumption characteristic of addiction. Repeated intraperitoneal (ip) injections of ethanol (EtOH) can induce psychomotor sensitization in mice. In terms of its clinical relevance, however, it is important to determine whether this phenomenon can also be produced by voluntary EtOH consumption.

METHODS

The present investigation used a drinking-in-the-dark (DID) methodology to induce high levels of EtOH drinking in mice; EtOH replaces water for 2 or 4h, starting 3h after the beginning of the dark cycle. Animals followed a 3-week DID protocol prior to an evaluation of EtOH-induced locomotor activity (acute and repeated EtOH). For the first week, animals had access to 20% EtOH. On weeks 2 and 3, different concentrations of EtOH (10, 20 or 30%) were used. Three different inbred strains of mice were used: C57BL/6J (B6), BALB/cByJ (BALB), and CXBK. The CXBK mouse line was used because of its reduced expression and functioning of brain mu-opioid receptors, which have been suggested to participate in the development of EtOH-induced sensitization. B6 and BALB mice were used as controls.

RESULTS

B6 and CXBK mice presented comparable levels of EtOH drinking (approx. 3g/kg in 2h), that were higher than those showed by BALB. All animals, regardless of genotype, adjusted volume of EtOH intake to obtain stable g/kg of EtOH across concentrations. Previous EtOH DID produced (B6) or potentiated (BALB) sensitization to EtOH; this effect was not seen in CXBK. Western blot analysis showed a reduced number of mu-opioid receptors in several brain regions of CXBK as compared to that of B6 and BALB mice.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, here we show that the DID methodology can be used to trigger EtOH-induced neuroplasticity supporting psychomotor sensitization, a process that might require participation of mu-opioid receptors.

Ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in DBA/2J mice is associated with alterations in GABA(A) subunit gene expression and behavioral sensitivity to GABA(A) acting drugs

Repeated exposure to ethanol may produce increased sensitivity to its acute locomotor stimulant actions, a process referred to as locomotor sensitization. Neuroadaptation within certain brain circuits, including those possessing GABA(A) receptors, may underlie locomotor sensitization to ethanol. Indeed, GABA(A) receptors are documented mediators of ethanol's cellular and behavioral actions. Moreover, because subunit composition of this receptor is predictive of its pharmacology, it is possible that alterations in subunit composition contribute to the expression of locomotor sensitization to ethanol. The goal of the present study was to determine if alterations in GABA(A) subunit composition are associated with the expression of locomotor sensitization in DBA/2J mice, a strain known to be particularly susceptible to the development of this behavioral phenomenon. Following a modified 14day sensitization procedure (Phillips et al., 1994) relative changes in GABA(A) subunit gene expression were assessed in discrete mesolimbic brain regions. To determine if the observed changes in gene expression produced functional changes in the locomotor responses to drugs known to either preferentially or generally activate GABA(A) receptors normally possessing the significantly altered subunits, separate cohorts of animals were challenged with one of several low doses of zolpidem (alpha1-selective), etomidate (beta2/3-selective), or flurazepam (gamma2-directed) and assessed for locomotor alterations. Sensitized animals displayed increased expression of the alpha1, beta2, and gamma2 (v1) subunits in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) but not Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA). Additionally, sensitized animals displayed altered sensitivity to the locomotor actions of etomidate and flurazepam. These results support the hypothesis that neuroadaptive changes in GABA(A) subunit composition participate in the expression of locomotor sensitization.

Parametric analysis of the development and expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in female Swiss mice: effects of dose, injection schedule, and test context

RATIONALE

Repeated administrations of ethanol induce a progressive and enduring increase in its locomotor stimulant effects, a phenomenon termed behavioral sensitization that has not been systematically characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present studies was to characterize the development and expression of ethanol sensitization in female Swiss mice by examining (1) the doses of ethanol that induce behavioral sensitization, (2) the doses of acute ethanol challenges that are necessary to express behavioral sensitization, (3) the effects of the intervals between administrations, and (4) the context dependency of ethanol sensitization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice were i.p. injected for 8 days with various ethanol doses, and locomotion was recorded for 5 min. Two days after the last sensitization session, ethanol sensitization was tested in 30-min test sessions.

RESULTS

Mice repeatedly injected with 2.5 g/kg ethanol showed a progressive (200-300%) increase in locomotor activity. In response to a 2.5 g/kg ethanol challenge, the mice repeatedly treated with doses above 1.5 g/kg showed a significant sensitization. Following the induction of sensitization with the maximally effective sensitizing dose (2.5 g/kg), mice showed greater activation after challenges with 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 g/kg ethanol. The intervals (24, 48, or 96 h) between ethanol injections did not affect the induction or expression of sensitization. Finally, sensitization to 2.5 g/kg ethanol was expressed regardless of the context in which it was induced.

CONCLUSIONS

Female Swiss mice develop a robust context-independent sensitization after repeated ethanol injections at all doses above 1.5 g/kg, including highly sedative doses such as 4 g/kg.

Environmental modulation of ethanol-induced locomotor activity: Correlation with neuronal activity in distinct brain regions of adolescent and adult Swiss mice

Drug abuse is a concerning health problem in adults and has been recognized as a major problem in adolescents. Induction of immediate-early genes (IEG), such as c-Fos or Egr-1, is used to identify brain areas that become activated in response to various stimuli, including addictive drugs. It is known that the environment can alter the response to drugs of abuse. Accordingly, environmental cues may trigger drug-seeking behavior when the drug is repeatedly administered in a given environment. The goal of this study was first to examine for age differences in context-dependent sensitization and then evaluate IEG expression in different brain regions. For this, groups of mice received i.p. ethanol (2.0 g/kg) or saline in the test apparatus, while other groups received the solutions in the home cage, for 15 days. One week after this treatment phase, mice were challenged with ethanol injection. Acutely, ethanol increased both locomotor activity and IEG expression in different brain regions, indistinctly, in adolescent and adult mice. However, adults exhibited a typical context-dependent behavioral sensitization following repeated ethanol treatment, while adolescent mice presented gradually smaller locomotion across treatment, when ethanol was administered in a paired regimen with environment. Conversely, ethanol-treated adolescents expressed context-independent behavioral sensitization. Overall, repeated ethanol administration desensitized IEG expression in both adolescent and adult mice, but this effect was greatest in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex of adolescents treated in the context-dependent paradigm. These results suggest developmental differences in the sensitivity to the conditioned and unconditioned locomotor effects of ethanol.

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol does not result in cross-sensitization to NMDA receptor antagonists

RATIONALE

Behavioral sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol may be related to neuroadaptations within glutamatergic systems. Previous research has suggested that the N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) subclass of glutamate receptors is critical for the development of ethanol sensitization. We hypothesized that sensitization to ethanol would be associated with changes in sensitivity to NMDA receptor ligands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DBA/2J and heterogeneous stock (HS) mice were injected with ethanol or saline for 12 days and tested for their acute and sensitized responses to the locomotor effects of ethanol in automated activity monitors. After this treatment phase, mice were challenged with MK-801, ethanol, or ketamine, and locomotor activity was measured for 20 to 60 min. Other ethanol-sensitized and nonsensitized mice were assessed for sensitivity to the effects of NMDA after tail-vein infusions.

RESULTS

There was no evidence for cross-sensitization to MK-801 or ketamine, or altered sensitivity to NMDA in ethanol-sensitized animals, in any experiment. In one experiment, previously ethanol-treated HS mice developed tolerance to the locomotor stimulant effects of ketamine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization is not associated with increased behavioral sensitivity to NMDA receptor antagonists or altered sensitivity to NMDA receptor agonists. To the extent that changes in sensitivity to these ligands reflect changes in NMDA receptors, these results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that ethanol sensitization is associated with alterations in NMDA receptor-mediated processes.

The role of opioid receptor subtypes in the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol

Nonspecific blockade of opioid receptors has been found to prevent development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. Whether this effect is achieved through a specific opioid receptor subtype, however, is not clear. The present study investigated, for the first time, the role of specific opioid receptor subtypes in the development of ethanol-(2.5 g/kg/day; six sessions) induced locomotor sensitization in mice. We confirmed previous results showing that the nonspecific antagonism of opioid receptors (naltrexone; 0-2 mg/kg) prevented the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol, an effect attained at doses presumed to occupy only mu opioid receptors. This was confirmed by using the selective mu opioid receptor antagonist CTOP (0-1.5 mg/kg), which also blocked sensitization to ethanol. The selective delta receptor antagonist, naltrindole (0-10 mg/kg), however, did not alter sensitization. We further assessed the role of mu opioid receptors in sensitization to ethanol by exploring the involvement of mu(1), mu(1+2), and mu(3) opioid receptor subtypes. Results of these experiments revealed that the blockade of mu(1) (naloxonazine; 0-30 mg/kg) or mu(3) opioid receptors (3-methoxynaltrexone; 0-6 mg/kg) did not prevent locomotor sensitization to ethanol. Using naloxonazine under treatment conditions that block mu(1+2) opioid receptor subtypes we observed a retarded sensitization. The present data suggest that the concurrent inactivation of all mu opioid receptor subtypes may be required to prevent the neural adaptations underlying the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. In addition, these results support previous data suggesting a putative role for the mu opioid receptor endogenous ligand, beta-endorphin, and the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in ethanol sensitization.

Lack of evidence of a role for the neurosteroid allopregnanolone in ethanol-induced reward and c-fos expression in DBA/2 mice

Previous studies using the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride suggest that progesterone metabolites, particularly the endogenous neurosteroid allopregnanolone, mediate some of the effects of ethanol. Consequently, we studied the effect of finasteride (2 x 25 mg/kg s.c., 12 h apart) pretreatment on the acquisition and expression of ethanol (2 g/kg i.p.) induced conditioned place preference and c-fos expression in DBA/2 mice; a strain known to be particularly sensitive to ethanol. Ethanol administration induced a clear conditioned place preference and widespread c-fos expression, with elements of the extended amygdala, Edinger-Westphal nucleus and paraventricular nucleus being especially sensitive. However, despite an approximately 99% decrease in whole brain allopregnanolone content, finasteride pretreatment had remarkably little effect on either ethanol-induced conditioned place preference or ethanol-induced c-fos expression. Thus, aside from a general stimulatory effect on c-fos expression in the ventral tegmental area, and generally mild depression of locomotor activity, no other effects of finasteride or interaction with ethanol effects were identifiable. Together, these studies suggest that endogenous allopregnanolone plays little part in mediating acute ethanol-induced reward or neural activation in DBA/2 mice.

Involvement of protein kinase A in ethanol-induced locomotor activity and sensitization

RATIONALE

Mutant mice lacking the RIIbeta subunit of protein kinase A (regulatory subunit II beta(-/-)) show increased ethanol preference. Recent evidence suggests a relationship between heightened ethanol preference and susceptibility to ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization. It is currently unknown if protein kinase A signaling modulates the stimulant effects and/or behavioral sensitization caused by ethanol administration. To address this question, we examined the effects of repeated ethanol administration on locomotor activity RIIbeta(-/-) and littermate wild-type (RIIbeta(+/+)) mice on multiple genetic backgrounds.

METHODS

Over three consecutive days, mice were given single i.p. saline injections and immediately placed in a locomotor activity apparatus to establish a composite baseline for locomotor activity. Next, mice maintained on a hybrid 129/SvEvxC57BL/6J or pure C57BL/6J genetic background were given 10 i.p. ethanol injections before being placed in the activity apparatus. Each ethanol injection was separated by 3-4 days. To determine if changes in behavior were specific to ethanol injection, naïve mice were tested following repeated daily saline injections. The effects of ethanol injection on locomotor behavior were also assessed using an alternate paradigm in which mice were given repeated ethanol injections in their home cage environment.

RESULTS

Relative to RIIbeta(+/+) mice, RIIbeta(-/-) mice, regardless of genetic background, consistently showed significantly greater ethanol-induced locomotor activation. RIIbeta(-/-) mice also showed increased sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization resulting from repeated administration, an effect that was dependent on genetic background and testing paradigm. Increased locomotor activity by RIIbeta(-/-) mice was specific to ethanol injections, and was not related to altered blood ethanol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide novel evidence implicating an influence of protein kinase A signaling on ethanol-induced locomotor activity and behavioral sensitization. The observation that RIIbeta(-/-) mice are more sensitive to the effects of repeated ethanol administration suggests that normal protein kinase A signaling limits, or is protective against, the stimulant effects of ethanol and the plastic alterations that underlie behavioral sensitization.