Unraveling upper extremity performance in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A biophysical model

Imu-based kinematic analysis to enhance upper limb motor function assessment in neuromuscular diseases

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are neuromuscular diseases that lead to progressive muscle degeneration and weakness. Recent therapeutic advances for DMD and SMA highlight the need for accurate clinical evaluation. Traditionally, motor function of the upper limbs is assessed using motor function scales. However, these scales are influenced by clinician's interpretation and may lack accuracy. For this reason, clinicians are becoming interested in finding alternative solutions. In this context, Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have gained popularity, offering the possibility to quantitatively and objectively analyze motor function of patients to support clinicians' assessments. We analyzed upper limb kinematics of two groups of children with neuromuscular diseases, seventeen DMD patients and fifteen SMA patients, while performing the corresponding clinical assessment. These two groups were further subdivided into two categories (Category A and Category B), according to disease severity (Brooke scores ≤ 2 and Brooke scores > 2 , respectively). The results were compared against a group of ten healthy children. The metrics showing the strongest correlation with the clinical score were the workspace area in the frontal and transverse plane (DMD: ρ = 0.94 and ρ = 0.90; SMA: ρ = 0.78 and ρ = 0.81) and the workspace volume (DMD: ρ = 0.92; SMA ρ = 0.81). Additionally, statistically significant differences were found not only between healthy children and those with neuromuscular disease, but also across severity levels within the patient group. These results represent a first step toward validating IMU-based systems to helping clinicians to accurately quantify the motor status of children with neuromuscular diseases. Furthermore, data collected with inertial sensors can provide clinicians with additional information not available through subjective observation.

Validity and Reliability of the 6-min Pegboard and Ring Test in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Tests for assessing upper extremity (UE) functional capacity in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 6-min pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) as a practical tool for this purpose.

METHODS

Children with DMD (n = 22) were evaluated using the 6PBRT for UE functional capacity, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) for functionality, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) for quality of life, and a dynamometer for handgrip strength and UE muscle strength.

RESULTS

The 6PBRT showed excellent test-retest reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.978 (95% confidence interval, 0.946-0.984). A very strong positive correlation was observed between the test and retest 6PBRT mean scores (r = 0.981). The mean 6PBRT score exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations with handgrip strength (r = 0.653, r = 0.646, right/left, respectively), muscle strength (shoulder flexors [r = 0.793, r = 0.797, right/left, respectively], shoulder abductors (r = 0.763, r = 0.743, right/left, respectively), elbow flexors [r = 0.743, r = 0.755, right/left, respectively]), mean Q-DASH score (r = -0.555), and mean PedsQL score (r = 0.611).

DISCUSSION

The 6PBRT appears to be a valid and reliable measure for assessing upper extremity functional capacity in patients with DMD. This test is suitable for patients who are able to lift both hands above their heads.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06174025.

Gain and loss of upper limb abilities in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients: A 24-month study

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a neuromuscular condition characterized by muscle weakness. The Performance of upper limb (PUL) test is designed to evaluate upper limb function in DMD patients across three domains. The aim of this study is to identify frequently lost or gained PUL 2.0 abilities at distinct functional stages in DMD patients. This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data on 24-month PUL 2.0 changes related to ambulatory function. Ambulant patients were categorized based on initial 6MWT distance, non-ambulant patients by time since ambulation loss. Each PUL 2.0 item was classified as shift up, no change, or shift down. The study's cohort incuded 274 patients, with 626 paired evaluations at the 24-month mark. Among these, 55.1 % had activity loss, while 29.1 % had gains. Ambulant patients showed the lowest loss rates, mainly in the shoulder domain. The highest loss rate was in the shoulder domain in the transitioning subgroup and in elbow and distal domains in the non-ambulant patients. Younger ambulant patients demonstrated multiple gains, whereas in the other functional subgroups there were fewer gains, mostly tied to singular activities. Our findings highlight divergent upper limb domain progression, partly linked to functional status and baseline function.

The NuroSleeve, a user-centered 3D printed hybrid orthosis for individuals with upper extremity impairment

BACKGROUND

Active upper extremity (UE) assistive devices have the potential to restore independent functional movement in individuals with UE impairment due to neuromuscular diseases or injury-induced chronic weakness. Academically fabricated UE assistive devices are not usually optimized for activities of daily living (ADLs), whereas commercially available alternatives tend to lack flexibility in control and activation methods. Both options are typically difficult to don and doff and may be uncomfortable for extensive daily use due to their lack of personalization. To overcome these limitations, we have designed, developed, and clinically evaluated the NuroSleeve, an innovative user-centered UE hybrid orthosis.

METHODS

This study introduces the design, implementation, and clinical evaluation of the NuroSleeve, a user-centered hybrid device that incorporates a lightweight, easy to don and doff 3D-printed motorized UE orthosis and a functional electrical stimulation (FES) component. Our primary goals are to develop a customized hybrid device that individuals with UE neuromuscular impairment can use to perform ADLs and to evaluate the benefits of incorporating the device into occupational therapy sessions. The trial is designed as a prospective, open-label, single-cohort feasibility study of eight-week sessions combined with at-home use of the device and implements an iterative device design process where feedback from participants and therapists informs design improvement cycles.

RESULTS

All participants learned how to independently don, doff, and use the NuroSleeve in ADLs, both in clinical therapy and in their home environments. All participants showed improvements in their Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), which was the primary clinical trial outcome measure. Furthermore, participants and therapists provided valuable feedback to guide further development.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results from non-clinical testing and clinical evaluation demonstrate that the NuroSleeve has met feasibility and safety goals and effectively improved independent voluntary function during ADLs. The study's encouraging preliminary findings indicate that the NuroSleeve has met its technical and clinical objectives while improving upon the limitations of the existing UE orthoses owing to its personalized and flexible approach to hardware and firmware design.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04798378, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04798378 , date of registration: March 15, 2021.

Recommendations for studies on dynamic arm support devices in people with neuromuscular disorders: a scoping review with expert-based discussion

PURPOSE

Neuromuscular disorders are characterised by muscle weakness that limits upper extremity mobility, but can be alleviated with dynamic arm support devices. Current research highlights the importance and difficulties of evidence-based recommendations for device development. We aim to provide research recommendations primarily concerning upper extremity body functions, and secondarily activity and participation, environmental and personal factors.

METHODS

Evidence was synthesised from literature, ongoing studies, and expert opinions and tabulated within a framework based on a combination of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model and contextual constructs.

RESULTS

Current literature mostly investigated the motor capacity of muscle function, joint mobility, and upper body functionality, and a few studies also addressed the impact on activity and participation. In addition, experts considered knowledge on device utilisation in the daily environment and characterising the beneficiaries better as important. Knowledge gaps showed that ICF model components and contextual constructs should be better integrated and more actively included in future research.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended to, first, integrate multiple ICF model components and contextual constructs within one study design. Second, include the influence of environmental and personal factors when developing and deploying a device. Third, include short-term and long-term measurements to monitor adaptations over time. Finally, include user satisfaction as guidance to evaluate the device effectiveness.IMPLICATIONS ON REHABILITATIONSynthesized evidence will support future research and development of dynamic arm supports.Tabulated evidence stresses the importance of integrating ICF model components and contextual constructs to fill the knowledge gaps.Presented knowledge gaps and proposed steps guide the set up of future studies on dynamic arm supports.

Instruments to assess upper-limb function in children and adolescents with neuromuscular diseases: a systematic review

AIM

To synthesize clinical and scientific evidence regarding the instruments available to assess upper-limb function in paediatric patients with neuromuscular disease (NMD).

METHOD

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines (Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews no. CRD42020140343). Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were cross-sectional or longitudinal studies or randomized controlled trials that used scales or questionnaires to assess upper-limb function in paediatric patients with NMDs. The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and criteria for good measurement properties were applied to assess the methodological quality of the instruments.

RESULTS

In total, 34 articles and 12 instruments were included. The Brooke Upper Extremity (n=16) and Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) (n=12) instruments were the most used tools. The PUL and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) Upper Limb patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) tested more measurement properties and provided higher methodological quality scores for patients with DMD. Likewise, the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) was the most suitable instrument for patients with spinal muscular atrophy. No instrument has been devised to assess upper-limb function in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and no other disease-specific instruments were found.

INTERPRETATION

The PUL, DMD Upper Limb PROM, and RULM are the most suitable instruments to assess upper-limb function in the two most prevalent paediatric NMDs. The identified gaps and methodological flaws of the available instruments indicate a need to develop high-quality instruments to assess other types of paediatric NMDs. What this paper adds The most suitable observer-rater instrument to assess upper-limb function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the Performance of Upper Limb. The most suitable observer-rater instrument to assess upper-limb function in spinal muscular atrophy is the Revised Upper Limb Module. The DMD Upper Limb patient-reported outcome measure is recommended to assess the upper-limb performance of patients with DMD. Literature gaps and methodological flaws indicate the need to develop high-quality instruments to assess other types of paediatric neuromuscular disease.

Facilitators and Barriers to Wearing Hand Orthoses by Adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Mixed Methods Study Design

Background:

To retard shortening of finger flexors in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), hand orthoses are prescribed. However, many patients do not wear the orthoses regularly. To optimize orthotic interventions, we need insight into the factors influencing compliance.

Objective:

To evaluate the compliance regarding hand orthoses in an adult DMD population and to explore experiences and perceptions of DMD patients wearing orthoses, and of their caregivers.

Methods:

Mixed methods observational study, combining quantitative and qualitative data from medical charts combined with qualitative semi-structured interviews using a constant comparative method and a short validated questionnaire (D-QUEST).

Results:

65 medical charts were analyzed. 48 patients were assessed as needing hand orthoses, of whom 37.5 % were compliant. Qualitative data analyses revealed (1) motivation: preservation of hand function; (2) barriers: discomfort and impediments; (3) facilitators: good fit and personalized wearing schedule; (4) fitting process: satisfactory, but patients do not readily seek help when barriers appear.

Conclusions:

Patients are motivated to wear hand orthoses, but often discontinue use because of orthosis-and disease-specific barriers. The identification of these barriers leads to practical and feasible recommendations concerning the orthoses and the fitting process, such as less rigid material, preservation of some function while wearing the orthoses, and fixed evaluation points. The findings were confirmed by the D-QUEST.

Voluntary and magnetically evoked muscle contraction protocol in males with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Safety, feasibility, reliability, and validity

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Clinical trials addressing treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) require reliable and valid measurement of muscle contractile function across all disease severity levels. In this work we aimed to evaluate a protocol combining voluntary and evoked contractions to measure strength and excitability of wrist extensor muscles for safety, feasibility, reliability, and discriminant validity between males with DMD and controls.

METHODS

Wrist extensor muscle strength and excitability were assessed in males with DMD (N = 10; mean ± standard deviation: 15.4 ± 5.9 years of age), using the Brooke Upper Extremity Rating Scale (scored 1-6), and age-matched healthy male controls (N = 15; 15.5 ± 5.0 years of age). Torque and electromyographic (EMG) measurements were analyzed under maximum voluntary and stimulated conditions at two visits.

RESULTS

A protocol of multiple maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and evoked twitch contractions was feasible and safe, with 96% of the participants completing the protocol and having a less than 7% strength decrement on either measure for both DMD patients and controls (P ≥ .074). Reliability was excellent for voluntary and evoked measurements of torque and EMG (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] over 0.90 and over 0.85 within and between visits, respectively). Torque, EMG, and timing of twitch-onset measurements discriminated between DMD and controls (P < .001). Twitch contraction time did not differ significantly between groups (P = .10).

DISCUSSION

Findings from this study show that the protocol is a safe, feasible, reliable, and a valid method to measure strength and excitability of wrist extensors in males with DMD.

Quantitative description of upper extremity function and activity of people with spinal muscular atrophy

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic management of the upper extremity (UE) function of people with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) requires sensitive and objective assessment. Therefore, we aimed to measure physiologic UE function of SMA patients with different functional abilities and evaluate the relation between these physiologic measures and functional UE scales.

METHODS

12 male and 5 female SMA patients (mean age 42 years; range 6-62 years) participated in this explorative study. Concerning the physiologic level, the maximal muscle torque, the maximal and normalized surface electromyography (sEMG) amplitudes, and the maximal passive and active joint angles were measured. Concerning the activity level, the Performance of the Upper Limb (PUL) scale was used, and hand function was examined using the Nine-Hole Peg Test and the Timed Test of In-Hand Manipulation (TIHM).

RESULTS

Outcome measures that significantly related to the functional ability were: the PUL score (all dimensions); the finger to palm task of the Timed TIHM; biceps, triceps, and forearm extensor strength; and the active range of motion of shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, and wrist extension. In addition, the following physiologic variables were related to the activity level (PUL score): hand function (the Nine-Hole Peg Test; Rs = - 0.61), the Timed TIHM (Rs = - 0.53), the maximal muscle torque (Rs = 0.74), the maximal sEMG amplitude (Rs = 0.79), and the maximal active joint angle (Rs = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle functions in SMA patients are already affected before activity limitations are noticeable. Consequently, monitoring the maximal muscle strength and the normalized muscle activity during task performance could play a role in the early detection of UE limitations. The mechanism behind the loss of arm activities due to SMA is primarily caused by decreasing muscle capacity, which influences the ability to move an arm actively. In clinical practices, these dimensions should be considered separately when monitoring disease progression in order to better evaluate the need for interventions.