Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled trial

Comparative Analytical Study of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Bevacizumab in Managing Diabetic Macular Edema: Insights From a Tertiary Eye Care Facility in India

AIM

This study aims to compare the effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and bevacizumab (IVB) in diabetic macular edema (DME) management.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective interventional study was conducted at a tertiary eye care hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. The study received approval from the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with macular edema attributable to non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), exhibiting best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 6/18, and presenting a medical indication for either IVTA or IVB. Exclusion criteria included the presence of other ocular diseases, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, ocular inflammation, prior interventional treatments for DME, and pregnancy. Baseline assessments were comprehensive and included evaluations of BCVA, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Participants in both groups adhered to standardized injection protocols and post-injection care routines, with follow-up monitoring scheduled at one week and one, three, and six months post-treatment. The primary outcome measures comprised changes in BCVA, IOP, findings from slit-lamp, and fundus examinations, alongside assessments of macular thickness through OCT and fundus photography. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.), ensuring rigorous evaluation of the collected data.

RESULTS

A study involving 50 patients with NPDR and clinically significant macular edema compared the effects of IVTA and IVB. In Group I (IVTA), significant improvements in BCVA were observed at both one and three months; however, there was a slight decline in vision by six months. The reduction in central foveal thickness (CFT) was sustained in this group, but IOP increased, with one case necessitating surgical intervention. In Group II (IVB), BCVA improvement was quicker at one and three months, yet by six months, both vision and CFT worsened significantly. Notably, IVB maintained stable IOP throughout the study. While IVTA demonstrated a more prolonged effect on macular thickness, it was associated with higher risks related to IOP, whereas IVB provided faster, albeit less durable, outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Both IVTA and IVB effectively enhance visual acuity and reduce macular edema in diabetic retinopathy. IVB demonstrates superior short-term gains in visual acuity (over one to three months). In contrast, IVTA is more effective in decreasing CFT, thanks to its broader mechanism of action, including inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor and cytokines. The longer half-life of IVTA provides more sustained anatomical benefits but is associated with higher IOP, necessitating careful monitoring. Conversely, IVB presents fewer complications, making it a safer option for certain patients. Treatment choice should consider the patient's risk profile, balancing efficacy with potential side effects.

Comparison of intravitreal preservative-free triamcinolone versus posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema

BACKGROUND

Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is administered as an intravitreal or posterior sub-Tenon's capsule injection, as treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). The intravitreal use of TA is limited because commercially available triamcinolone acetonide contains benzyl alcohol, a neurotoxic preservative. Few studies have compared effects of preservative-free intravitreal TA (IVTA) and posterior sub-Tenon capsule TA (STTA) injections for DME. Thus, herein, we compared the effectiveness of preservative-free IVTA and STTA for treatment of bevacizumab-resistant DME.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, bevacizumab-resistant DME was defined as a lack of response to at least three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections. Changes in mean central macula thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) between IVTA and STTA groups were compared at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Forty eyes from 40 patients were included in this study. In the IVTA group, the mean CMT improved significantly from 400.2 ± 144.42 μm at baseline to 288.35 ± 151.74 μm at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.01). Similarly, in the STTA group, the mean CMT improved significantly from 446.65 ± 120.74 μm at baseline to 382.9 ± 113.58 μm at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.009). The mean BCVA of the IVTA group also showed improvement, decreasing from 0.75 ± 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline to 0.625 ± 0.50 logMAR at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.089). Similarly, the mean BCVA of the STTA group improved, from 0.6 ± 0.36 logMAR at baseline to 0.54 ± 0.35 logMAR at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.094).

CONCLUSION

Given that IVTA and STTA demonstrated statistically equivalent anatomical and functional effects in patients with bevacizumab-resistant DME, the less invasive STTA may be considered the preferred treatment approach for the management of bevacizumab-resistant DME.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Phacoemulsification in patients with diabetic macular edema - A real-world data of 75 eyes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of phacoemulsification with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in patients with cataract and diabetic macular edema (DME) across the grades of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a retrospective observational study. The study included 70 patients (75 eyes) with cataract and clinically significant macular edema in diabetics with nonproliferative (61 eyes) or proliferative (14 eyes) DR who underwent phacoemulsification with IVTA. Visual outcome and progression of DME over 3 months were studied in terms of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT), respectively.

RESULTS

The case records of 70 patients (75 eyes) were studied. The mean baseline BCVA (n = 75) in the logMAR scale ± SD was 0.92 ± 0.53. 3 weeks after the surgery, the mean BCVA improved to 0.39 ± 0.26 and the mean CMT (n = 40) was 382.57 ± 192.30 compared with the mean preoperative CMT of 480.57 ± 163.25 in the same set (P = 0.01). The mean CMT decreased at 3 weeks in 22 (55% of the eyes). An improvement of ≥2 lines was seen at 3 weeks in 52 (69.33%) eyes and in 49 (65.33%) eyes at 3 months. The mean CMT at 3 months was 445.51 ± 222.99 (n = 70) compared to the preoperative mean CMT of 470.72 ± 176.15 in the same set (P = 0.29). The mean CMT decreased at 3 months in 34 (48.5%) eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Phacoemulsification with IVTA injection improved the mean visual acuity at 3 weeks and 3 months in two-thirds of cases and decreased the mean CMT at 3 weeks in nearly half the numbers.

Research trends of worldwide ophthalmologic randomized controlled trials in the 21st century: A bibliometric study

Background

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered the gold standard and the cornerstone for clinical practice. However, bibliometric studies on worldwide RCTs of ophthalmology published in the 21st century have not been reported in detail yet. This study aims to perform a bibliometric study and visualization analysis of worldwide ophthalmologic RCTs in the 21st century.

Methods

Global ophthalmologic RCTs from 2000 to 2022 were searched in the Web of Science Core Collection. The number of publications, country/region, institution, author, journal, and research hotspots of RCTs were analyzed using HistCite, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Excel software.

Results

2366 institutions and 90 journals from 83 countries/regions participated in the publication of 1769 global ophthalmologic RCTs, with the United States leading in the number of volumes and research field, and the Moorfields Eye Hospital contributing to the most publications. Ophthalmology received the greatest number of publications and co-citations. Jeffrey S. Heier owned the most publications and Jost B. Jonas owned the most co-citations. The knowledge foundations of global ophthalmologic RCTs were mainly retinopathy, glaucoma, dry eye disease (DED), and cataracts, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (ranibizumab), topical ocular hypotensive medication, laser trabeculoplasty. Anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), DME (diabetic macular edema), and DED, the use of new diagnostic tools, and myopia were the hottest research highlights. Anti-VEGF therapy, prompt laser, triamcinolone, and verteporfin photodynamic therapy for AMD, DME, and CNV (choroidal neovascularization), DED, myopia, and open-angle glaucoma were the research hotspots with the longest duration. The future research hotspots might be DED and the prevention and control of myopia.

Conclusions

Overall, the number of global ophthalmologic RCTs in the 21st century was keeping growing, there was an imbalance between the regions and institutions, and more efforts are required to raise the quantity, quality, and global impact of high-quality clinical evidence in developing countries/regions.

The Evolution of Triamcinolone Acetonide Therapeutic Use in Retinal Diseases: From Off-Label Intravitreal Injection to Advanced Nano-Drug Delivery Systems

Ophthalmic drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye has been challenging due to the complex ocular anatomy. Intravitreal injection of drugs was introduced to deliver therapeutic doses in the posterior segment. Different posterior segment diseases including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusions, uveitis, and cystoid macular edema, among others, have been historically treated with intravitreal corticosteroids injections, and more recently with intravitreal corticosteroids drug implants. Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is the most frequently used intraocular synthetic corticosteroid. Using nanoparticle-based TA delivery systems has been proposed as an alternative to intravitreal injections in the treatment of posterior segment diseases. From these novel delivery systems, topical liposomes have been the most promising strategy. This review is oriented to exhibit triamcinolone acetonide drug evolution and its results in treating posterior segment diseases using diverse delivery platforms.

Current and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major ocular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), leading to significant visual impairment. DME's pathogenesis is multifactorial. Focal edema tends to occur when primary metabolic abnormalities lead to a persistent hyperglycemic state, causing the development of microaneurysms, often with extravascular lipoprotein in a circinate pattern around the focal leakage. On the other hand, diffusion edema is due to a generalized breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier, leading to profuse early leakage from the entire capillary bed of the posterior pole with the subsequent extravasation of fluid into the extracellular space. The pathogenesis of DME occurs through the interaction of multiple molecular mediators, including the overexpression of several growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor-1, angiopoietin-1, and -2, stromal-derived factor-1, fibroblast growth factor-2, and tumor necrosis factor. Synergistically, these growth factors mediate angiogenesis, protease production, endothelial cell proliferation, and migration. Treatment for DME generally involves primary management of DM, laser photocoagulation, and pharmacotherapeutics targeting mediators, namely, the anti-VEGF pathway. The emergence of anti-VEGF therapies has resulted in significant clinical improvements compared to laser therapy alone. However, multiple factors influencing the visual outcome after anti-VEGF treatment and the presence of anti-VEGF non-responders have necessitated the development of new pharmacotherapies. In this review, we explore the pathophysiology of DME and current management strategies. In addition, we provide a comprehensive analysis of emerging therapeutic approaches to the treatment of DME.

Steroid Treatment in Macular Edema: A Bibliometric Study and Visualization Analysis

The use of steroids to treat macular edema (ME) is a research hotspot in ophthalmology. We utilized CiteSpace and VOSviewer software to evaluate the Web of Science Core Collection publications and to build visualizing maps to describe the research progress in this topic. There were 3,252 publications for three decades during 1988–2021. The number of studies was low during the first 14 years but has risen consistently in the following two decades. The average publications per year were only 4.8 during 1988–2002, which jumped to 113 per year during 2003–2012, and 227 per year during 2013–2021. These publications came from 83 countries/regions, with the United States, Germany, and Italy leading positions. Most studies were published in Investigative Ophthalmology Visual Science, and Ophthalmology was the most cited journal. We found 9,993 authors, with Bandello F having the most publications and Jonas JB being the most frequently co-cited. According to our research, the most popular keyword is triamcinolone acetonide (TA). Macular edema, diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), dexamethasone (DEX), fluocinolone acetonide (FA), and some other keywords were commonly studied in this field. In conclusion, the bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of steroid hotspots and developmental tendencies in the macular edema study. While anti-VEGF therapy is the first-line treatment for DME and RVO-induced macular edema, steroids implant is a valid option for these DME patients not responding to anti-VEGF therapy and non-DME patients with macular edema. Combined therapy with anti-VEGF and steroid agents is vital for future research.

Suprachoroidal versus Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

This article aims to compare between intravitreal (IV) and suprachoroidal (SC) triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in terms of improvement in both best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT), and development of complications (intraocular pressure (IOP) rise and cataract progression), and to identify the efficient dose of TA using the SC route.

Patients and Methods

This prospective interventional randomized comparative study included 45 eyes of 32 patients, randomly divided into three groups, group I received 4 mg/0.1 mL intravitreal TA (IVTA), group II received 4 mg/0.1 mL suprachoroidal TA (SCTA), and group III received 2mg/0.1 mL SCTA. Patients were followed up for 6 months.

Results

At 1 month, a maximum reduction in CMT (147.33 ± 110.97 µm, 160.80 ± 98.25 µm and 65.64 ± 46.19 µm in groups I, II, and III, respectively) was observed, which was associated with the greatest improvement of BCVA (0.09 ± 0.09, 0.19 ± 0.10 and 0.10 ± 0.09 logMAR lines) in groups I, II, and III, respectively. At 3 months, CMT started to increase, and reduction was not statistically significant compared to baseline, except in group II (4 mg SCTA group) (149.80 ± 106.57 µm with P-value = 0.013). At 6 months, CMT and BCVA returned close to baseline except for group II which had a sustained reduction of 60.16 µm from baseline. Regarding steroid-related complications, IOP elevation of 10 mmHg or more was noted in 1 eye (6.7%), 2 eyes (13.3%), and 1 eye in groups I, II, and III, respectively. Three phakic eyes per group showed cataract progression.

Conclusion

SCTA is a safe and effective route for the treatment of DME, which has comparable effects to IVTA, and may even last longer.

A randomized clinical trial of triamcinolone acetonide injection for suppression of inflammation after blepharoptosis surgery

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of triamcinolone acetonide in suppressing inflammation after blepharoptosis surgery. The study was designed as prospective, randomized, two medical centers' clinical trial. Thirty-two patients with involutional blepharoptosis of the same degree in both eyelids underwent bilateral transcutaneous levator advancement. At the end of the surgery, 4 mg/0.1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide was injected into a randomly selected upper eyelid. The fellow eyelid was not injected and was used as control. Facial photographs were taken on day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3, and the degree of inflammation, the margin reflex distance 1 (MRD-1), and levator function (LF) between the two eyelids of each patient were compared. The primary outcome was the selection of the less inflamed eyelid decided by the majority of three individuals unrelated to the study. MRD-1 and LF were analyzed for secondary outcomes. As a result, the injected eyelid was judged to be the less inflamed eyelid in all cases. The MRD-1 in the postoperative period less than 1 month was significantly larger in the injected eyelids than the control eyelids (P<0.03). The postsurgical MRD-1 at month 3, the postsurgical LF at all postsurgical examination times were not statistically different. Adverse complications by the injection, including ptosis, levator dysfunction, increase of the intraocular pressure, and visual disturbance were not observed. In conclusion, a triamcinolone acetonide injection after ptosis surgery is both safe and effective in reducing the early postsurgical inflammation and helpful in an earlier return to a daily routine for the patients.

Safety of intravitreal triamcinolone and its impact on optic nerve morphology in patients treated for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of one intravitreal injection (IVT) of Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) on intraocular pressure (IOP) and optic nerve structural parameters in patients treated for Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with DME that were naïve to intraocular steroids and underwent one IVT of TA of 4 mg/0.1 mL and age-matched controls with DME without criteria for IVT. Patients records were reviewed for IOP (at baseline and a month after IVT) and optic nerve parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (up to 6 months before and 6 months after IVT). Exclusion criteria included glaucoma and treatment with hypotensive agents.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes were included in the Control Group and 29 in the IVT Group, with a mean age of 65.10 ± 10.08 and 67.30 ± 4.71 years, respectively (p = 0.06). At baseline, IOP and optic nerve measurements were equivalent between groups (p > 0.05). One month after IVT, mean IOP measurements in IVT Group were higher than those of controls (17.84 ± 4.50 vs 11.59 ± 3.09 mmHg, p < 0.001). Ocular hypertension (OHT) developed in 17.24% of cases and reversed with topical medication. After one IVT, vertical cup/disc ratio was higher (0.57 ± 0.25 vs 0.60 ± 0.14, p = 0.04) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was globally lower (mean: 91.03 ± 4.25 vs 81.33 ± 19.10 µm, p = 0.001) in the IVT Group.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed that intravitreal TA results in IOP increase. This seems to negatively affect optic nerve morphology, even in patients without OHT or adequately treated with hypotensive agents.

Anti-VEGF-Resistant Retinal Diseases: A Review of the Latest Treatment Options

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy currently plays a central role in the treatment of numerous retinal diseases, most notably exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusions. While offering significant functional and anatomic benefits in most patients, there exists a subset of 15–40% of eyes that fail to respond or only partially respond. For these cases, various treatment options have been explored with a range of outcomes. These options include steroid injections, laser treatment (both thermal therapy for retinal vascular diseases and photodynamic therapy for eAMD), abbreviated anti-VEGF treatment intervals, switching anti-VEGF agents and topical medications. In this article, we review the effectiveness of these treatment options along with a discussion of the current research into future directions for anti-VEGF-resistant eyes.

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is secondary to leakage from diseased retinal capillaries with thickening of central retina, and is an important cause of poor central visual acuity in people with diabetic retinopathy. Intravitreal steroids have been used to reduce retinal thickness and improve vision in people with DME.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal steroid therapy compared with other treatments for DME.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase on 15 May, 2019. We also searched reference lists, Science Citation Index, conference proceedings, and relevant trial registers. We conducted a top up search on 21 October, 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated any type of intravitreal steroids as monotherapy against any other intervention (e.g. observation, laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (antiVEGF) for DME.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials (4348 participants, 4505 eyes). These trials compared intravitreal steroid therapies versus other treatments, including intravitreal antiVEGF therapy, laser photocoagulation, and sham injection. Most trials had an overall unclear or high risk of bias. One trial (701 eyes ) compared intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7mg with sham. We found moderate-certainty evidence that dexamethasone leads to slightly more improvement of visual acuity than sham at 12 months (mean difference [MD] -0.08 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.12 to -0.05 logMAR). Regarding improvement of three or more lines of visual acuity, there was moderate-certainty evidence in favor of dexamethasone at 12 months, but the CI covered the null value (risk ratio (RR) 1.39, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.12). Regarding adverse events, dexamethasone increased by about four times the risk of cataract progression and the risk of using intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications compared to sham (RR 3.89, 95% CI 2.75 to 5.50 and RR 4.54, 95% CI 3.19 to 6.46, respectively; moderate-certainty evidence); about 4 in 10 participants treated with dexamethasone needed IOP-lowering medications. Two trials (451 eyes) compared intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7mg with intravitreal antiVEGF (bevacizumab and ranibizumab). There was moderate-certainty evidence that visual acuity improved slightly less with dexamethasone compared with antiVEGF at 12 months (MD 0.07 logMAR, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.09 logMAR; 2 trials; 451 participants/eyes; I² = 0%). The RR of gain of three or more lines of visual acuity was inconsistent between trials, with one trial finding no evidence of a difference between dexamethasone and bevacizumab at 12 months (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.40; 1 trial; 88 eyes), and the other, larger trial finding the chances of vision gain were half with dexamethasone compared with ranibizumab (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.79; 1 trial; 432 participants). The certainty of evidence was low. Cataract progression and the need for IOP-lowering medications increased more than 4 times with dexamethasone implant compared to antiVEGF (moderate-certainty evidence). One trial (560 eyes) compared intravitreal fluocinolone implant 0.19mg with sham. There was moderate-certainty evidence that visual acuity improved slightly more with fluocinolone at 12 months (MD -0.04 logMAR, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.01 logMAR). There was moderate-certainty evidence that an improvement in visual acuity of three or more lines was more common with fluocinolone than with sham at 12 months (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.78). Fluocinolone also increased the risk of cataract progression (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.97; participants = 335; moderate-certainty evidence), which occurred in about 8 in 10 participants, and the use of IOP-lowering medications (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.98; participants = 558; moderate-certainty evidence), which were needed in 2 to 3 out of 10 participants. One small trial with 43 participants (69 eyes) compared intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg with sham. There may be a benefit in visual acuity at 24 months (MD -0.11 logMAR, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.03 logMAR), but the certainty of evidence is low. Differences in adverse effects were poorly reported in this trial. Two trials (615 eyes) compared intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4mg with laser photocoagulation and reached discordant results. The smaller trial (31 eyes followed up to 9 months) found more visual acuity improvement with triamcinolone (MD -0.18 logMAR, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.07 logMAR), but a larger, multicenter trial (584 eyes, 12-month follow-up) found no evidence of a difference regarding change in visual acuity (MD 0.02 logMAR, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.07 logMAR) or gain of three or more lines of visual acuity (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.30) (overall low-certainty evidence). Cataract progression was about three times more likely (RR 2.68, 95% CI 2.21 to 3.24; moderate-certainty evidence) and the use of IOP-lowering medications was about four times more likely (RR 3.92, 95% CI 2.59 to 5.96; participants = 627; studies = 2; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) with triamcinolone. About 1 in 3 participants needed IOP-lowering medication. One small trial (30 eyes) compared intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4mg with intravitreal antiVEGF (bevacizumab or ranibizumab). Visual acuity may be worse with triamcinolone at 12 months (MD 0.18 logMAR, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.26 logMAR); the certainty of evidence is low. Adverse effects were poorly reported in this trial. Four trials reported data on pseudophakic participants, for whom cataract is not a concern. These trials found no decrease in visual acuity in the second treatment year due to cataract progression.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal steroids may improve vision in people with DME compared to sham or control. Effects were small, about one line of vision or less in most comparisons. More evidence is available for dexamethasone or fluocinolone implants when compared to sham, and the evidence is limited and inconsistent for the comparison of dexamethasone with antiVEGF treatment. Any benefits should be weighed against IOP elevation, the use of IOP-lowering medication and, in phakic patients, the progression of cataract. The need for glaucoma surgery is also increased, but remains rare.

Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus nonsurgical treatment for diabetic macular edema with massive hard exudates

Purpose

To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of severe diabetic macular edema (DME) with massive hard exudates managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or nonsurgical treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 40 eyes with DME and massive hard exudates treated with either PPV with ILM peeling (vitrectomy group, 21 eyes) or nonsurgical treatment with anti-vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) and/or steroids (nonsurgical group, 19 eyes). Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) and resolution of macular hard exudates were compared between the two groups.

Results

After treatment, CRT decreased steadily in the vitrectomy group but fluctuated in the nonsurgical group. Compared with eyes in the nonsurgical group, eyes in the vitrectomy group had better visual improvement (P < 0.05 at 6 and 12 months and the final visit) and greater decrease in CRT (P < 0.05 at 3 and 6 months and the final visit) after adjustment for baseline BCVA. Hard exudates resolved more rapidly in the vitrectomy group than in the nonsurgical group, with 94.1% versus 47.4% eyes showing significant absorption after 6 months of the treatment (P = 0.003). In the vitrectomy group, 62% eyes did not require any further injections for treating DME after the operation.

Conclusions

PPV with ILM peeling resulted in rapid resolution of hard exudates with significant anatomical and functional improvement in DME with massive hard exudates.

Changes in real-world treatment patterns for diabetic macular oedema from 2009 to 2019 and 5-year outcomes: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

IMPORTANCE

Evaluating the treatment outcomes of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in routine clinical practice provides data for comparison with those of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND

Phase 3 clinical trials of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for DMO have reported significant improvements in visual acuity (VA) not previously reported with laser and steroid treatments.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of observational data from routine clinical practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes receiving treatments for DMO tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

METHODS

We analysed 510 eyes (347 patients) that started DMO treatment between 2009 and 2014.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in DMO treatment patterns and mean change in VA (letters logMAR) and central subfield thickness (CST) 5 years after starting treatment.

RESULTS

Treatment choice for DMO changed to predominantly VEGF inhibitors from 2009 to 2014. A total of 238 eyes (47%) were followed for at least 5 years. The mean VA at the start of treatment improved from 2009 (58 letters) to 2014 (68 letters) while mean VA change at 5 years were + 4.5 and + 5.3 letters for eyes starting treatment in 2009 and 2014, respectively. The mean CST dropped from 401 μm at baseline to 314 μm at 5 years. Eyes received a median of four injections in the first, two in the second, third and fourth and three in the fifth years.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Changing the treatment of DMO from macular laser and intravitreal triamcinolone to VEGF inhibitors from 2011 onwards was associated with better VA outcomes, part of which were due to better VA at the start of treatment. The outcomes of treatment in eyes in real-world practice were, however, worse than those reported by clinical trials, likely because they were undertreated.

Manufacturing of Dexamethasone-Poly(d,l-Lactide-co-Glycolide) Implants Using Hot-Melt Extrusion: Within- and Between-Batch Product Performance Comparisons

Purpose: Reliable drug therapy with injectable intravitreal implants requires implants of consistent quality. The purpose of this study was to prepare dexamethasone-poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) biodegradable implants and assess implant quality within and between batches for different polymer compositions. Methods: Implants containing 20% w/w dexamethasone with 3 theoretical rates of release (fast, intermediate, and slow) were manufactured with decreasing proportion of acid-terminated PLGA (50:50) and increasing proportion of ester-terminated PLGA (50:50) in a batch process using hot-melt extrusion. The implants were manufactured without and with in-process modification of extrusion/conveyor speed in the late phase of each batch. Implant samples collected at early, middle, and late phases of each batch were analyzed for diameter, drug loading, mechanical properties (strength and toughness), and drug release. Results: With a fixed process, unlike a modified process with an increase in extrusion speed and reduction of conveyor speed in the late phase, all implant formulations tended to decrease in diameter and mechanical properties in the late phase. Drug release profiles for the intermediate and slow release compositions were similar with or without process modification, unlike the fast release composition. Addition of ester-terminated PLGA resulted in a slower drug release. When all formulations are grouped together, the implant diameter exhibited a moderate correlation with mechanical properties, but no correlation was observed with drug release. Conclusions: Within a hot-melt extrusion batch process, the dexamethasone-PLGA implant diameter and hence toughness and strength tend to decline in the latter phase. In-process adjustment of extrusion and conveyor speeds can improve batch consistency and, potentially, implant integrity or performance during or after injection. Process changes did not affect drug release for 2 of the 3 implant compositions.

Corticosteroids for Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a chronic condition with a multifactorial pathogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and several inflammatory mediators are upregulated in eyes with DME. VEGF inhibitors and corticosteroids have all been used successfully in the management of DME. Currently available corticosteroids include triamcinolone acetonide (TA), the dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant, and the fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreal implant. The response to treatment can vary substantially with each treatment modality. Some cases of DME are VEGF driven, and in others, inflammation plays a key role. Chronicity appears to favor corticosteroid treatment. There are no clear guidelines to guide switching from an anti-VEGF to a corticosteroid. Combination therapy of an anti-VEGF drug and a corticosteroid does not appear to provide additional benefit over monotherapy with either drug. The main advantage of corticosteroids over VEGF inhibitors is their longer duration of action. Vitrectomy does not affect the pharmacokinetics of the corticosteroid implants. Common adverse events of corticosteroids include cataract formation, cataract progression, and ocular hypertension. TA may cause a sterile endophthalmitis and pseudoendophthalmitis. Migration of the intravitreal DEX and FA implants into the anterior chamber can be problematic. Because of their less favorable safety profile, corticosteroids are generally used as a second-line treatment for DME. Advantages of using an intravitreal corticosteroid implant include the reduction of treatment burden and predictable pharmacokinetics even in vitrectomized eyes. Pseudophakic eyes, previously vitrectomized eyes and eyes with long-standing DME, particularly of patients who have difficulty in maintaining a monthly appointment, may benefit from primary treatment with a corticosteroid intravitreal implant.

Combination of intravitreal bevacizumab and erythropoietin versus intravitreal bevacizumab alone for refractory diabetic macular edema: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of three intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections alone or in combination with intravitreal erythropoietin (EPO) in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

In a randomized double-blind clinical trial, 48 eyes of 34 diabetic patients with refractory DME were enrolled. Eyes were randomly assigned to receive either 3 monthly injections of 0.05 cc (1.25 mg) IVB plus 0.05 cc (1000 unit) EPO or 0.05 cc (1.25 mg) IVB alone. Main outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes and secondary outcome was central macular thickness (CMT). The patients were followed for 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean BCVA changes up to 4 and 6 months were insignificant in both groups. It changed from 0.72 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.74 ± 0.5 (P = 0.85) and 0.71 ± 0.44 (P = 0.40) in the combination group and from 0.48 ± 0.39 logMAR to 0.47 ± 0.35 (P = 0.48) and 0.52 ± 0.33 (P = 0.69) in the IVB alone group, at 4 and 6 months, respectively. The difference of mean BCVA changes between the groups was insignificant at both 4 and 6 months (P = 0.07 and P = 0.36, respectively). Within the group changes of mean CMT were significant only in the combination group at 4 and 6 months, from 518 ± 134 μ at baseline to 472 ± 151 to 475 ± 167 μ, respectively (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05). Corresponding changes were not significant in the IVB alone group. However, the difference between the groups was not significant at all visits (P = 0.51 and P = 0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial demonstrated that intravitreal erythropoietin had no additional effect to IVB in the treatment of refractory DME in the short term.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT03821168.

Vitrectomy Combined with Intraoperative Dexamethasone Implant for the Management of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To evaluate the 1-year results of vitrectomy performed in combination with intraoperative dexamethasone implant for tractional and nontractional refractory diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods

Thirteen eyes from 13 subjects who were diagnosed with tractional DME and 17 eyes from 17 subjects who were diagnosed with nontractional refractory DME underwent vitrectomy and dexamethasone implant injection. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) during the one year following vitrectomy were evaluated in each group. Additionally, changes in intraocular pressure and other complications were investigated postoperatively.

Results

In eyes with tractional DME, a statistically significant improvement in BCVA was noted at 3, 6, and 12 months, and a statistically significant improvement in CMT was noted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline after vitrectomy (p < 0.05). In eyes with nontractional refractory DME, a statistically significant improvement in BCVA was noted at 12 months, but there were no significant improvements in CMT despite the tendency to decrease from baseline. Sixteen (53.3%) of the 30 eyes included in this study showed intraocular pressure elevation, which was addressed using antiglaucoma medication, and there were no other severe complications.

Conclusions

Vitrectomy combined with intraoperative dexamethasone implant may be safe and effective in treating DME, especially tractional DME. In this study, patients with nontractional DME required more additional treatments and time for anatomical and functional improvement compared to patients with tractional DME.

Efficacy of vitrectomy combined with an intraoperative dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vitrectomy combined with an intraoperative dexamethasone (Ozurdex^®) implant in refractory diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed at our institution as having DME refractory to more than 6 months of non-surgical treatment and underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implantation combined with vitrectomy. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure at the initial visit and 1, 3, 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eyes (22 patients) were included in this study. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.68 and the mean CMT was 470.80 µm. The total number of the previous injections was 5.1 ± 1.6. The mean BCVA was significantly improved at all visits, and the mean CMT was also significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Sixteen eyes (73%) did not need additional implantations during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitrectomy combined with an intraoperative dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant was an effective and safe treatment option in patients with refractory DME.

Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy with an increasing prevalence tied to the global epidemic in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its pathophysiology starts with decreased retinal oxygen tension that manifests as retinal capillary hyperpermeability and increased intravascular pressure mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upregulation and retinal vascular autoregulation, respectively. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is the cornerstone of clinical assessment of DME. The foundation of treatment is metabolic control of hyperglycemia and blood pressure. Specific ophthalmic treatments include intravitreal anti-VEGF drug injections, intravitreal corticosteroid injections, focal laser photocoagulation, and vitrectomy, but a substantial fraction of eyes respond incompletely to all of these modalities resulting in visual loss and disordered retinal structure and vasculature visible on SD-OCT and OCT angiography. Efforts to close the gap between the results of interventions within randomized clinical trials and in real-world contexts, and to reduce the cost of care increasingly occupy innovation in the social organization of ophthalmic care of DME. Pharmacologic research is exploring other biochemical pathways involved in retinal vascular homeostasis that may provide new points of intervention effective in those cases unresponsive to current treatments.

Cataract surgery in diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

India is considered the diabetes capital of the world, and a significant proportion of patients undergoing cataract surgery are diabetic. Considering this, we reviewed the principles and guidelines of managing cataract in patients with diabetes. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors are of paramount importance in the management of diabetic cataract patients. Particularly, the early recognition and treatment of diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy before cataract surgery influence the final visual outcome and play a major role in perioperative decision-making. Better understanding of various factors responsible for favorable outcome of cataract surgery in diabetic patients may guide us in better overalll management of these patients and optimizing the results.

Evaluation of the effect of combined intravitreal ranibizumab injection and sub-tenon steroid injection in the treatment of resistant diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To compare sub-tenon steroid plus anti-VEGF injection with anti-VEGF injection solely in the treatment of resistant diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHOD

Patients who exhibited insufficient anatomic [over 350 μm central macular thickness (CMT)] and less than 3 lines of visual gain at least six anti-VEGF injections, were randomly divided into two groups. In group I, the anti-VEGF injection was performed 10 days after the sub-tenon steroid injection [Triamcinolone acetonide (Sinakort-A^®)]. And anti-VEGF was performed when needed during the follow-up period. In group II, treatment was continued with anti-VEGF only. All patients' visual acuity and CMT were followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

The baseline BCVA in group I and group II was 0.51 ± 0.667 logMAR and 0.47 ± 0.60 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.52). In group I and II, at the end of 6-month follow-up, BCVA improved to 0.38 ± 0.60 logMAR (p < 0.001) and 0.43 ± 0.60 logMAR (p = 0.20), respectively. The baseline CMT in group I and group II was 494 ± 118.32 and 438.20 ± 90.99 μm, respectively (p = 0.029). In group I and II, at the end of 6 months, CMT decreased to 302.57 ± 69.89 μm (p < 0.001) and 439.20 ± 107.6 μm (p = 0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adding steroid to routine anti-VEGF treatment is an effective way of treatment method for resistant DME.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide as Primary Treatment for Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective Noncomparative Interventional Case Series

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of one intravitreal injection of 25 mg of triamcinolone acetonide as primary treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema.

Methods

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection was performed in 30 eyes with previously untreated diabetic macular edema. The main outcome measures were logMAR visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months. A secondary outcome was intraocular pressure progression.

Results

Visual acuity results for 30 eyes that had a follow-up of at least 6 months are presented. Twenty of them were followed up to 10.1 ±2.38 months. Preoperatively, VA was 0.54±0.27. At 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up, VA was 0.44±0.29 (p=0.001), 0.43±0.28 (p=0.001), and 0.45±0.29 (p=0.006), respectively. Preoperatively, CMT was 417.3±143.5 μm. At 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up, CMT was 277.3 +74.0 μm (p<0.0001), 279.6±94.4 μm (p<0.0001), and 297.07±114.87 μm (p=0.002), respectively. For the 20 eyes with a follow-up of 10.1±2.38 months, VA was 0.5±0.25 and 0.50±0.32 at baseline and at the last follow-up visit, respectively (p>0.05). Preoperatively, intraocular pressue (IOP) was 15.13±1.48 mmHg. IOP was 18.26±2.71 mmHg, 20.07±4.27 mmHg, and 20.4±6.18 mmHg, at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Four eyes underwent uncomplicated filtrating surgery for intractable glaucoma.

Conclusions

Intravitreal triamcinolone as primary treatment effectively increases VA and reduces CMT due to diffuse diabetic macular edema. Longer follow-up and randomized clinical trial are war ranted. Safety results highlight the need to further study the relationship between triamcinolone and intraocular pressure.

Follow-Up after Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To report on the follow-up of patients who received an intravitreal high-dosage injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

The clinical interventional case-series study included 109 eyes (90 patients) with diffuse diabetic macular edema who consecutively received an IVTA of about 20 mg. Mean follow-up was 11.2 +/- 6.2 months.

RESULTS

Visual acuity improved significantly (p<0.001) from 0.89 +/- 0.33 logMAR to a best minimum of 0.65 +/- 0.35 logMAR. An increase in best visual acuity by at least 1 Snellen line, 2 lines, and 3 lines was found in 91 (83%) eyes, 68 (62%) eyes, and 45 (41%) eyes, respectively. Differences in visual acuity between baseline and follow-up examinations were significant for measurements performed at 1 month (p<0.001), 2 months (p<0.001), 3 months (p<0.001), and at 6 months (p=0.001) after the injection. At 9 months after the injection, mean visual acuity regressed significantly so that visual acuity at 9 months (p=0.83) and at 12 months after the injection (p=0.58) compared with baseline values did not differ significantly. Forty-seven (43%) eyes developed a rise in intraocular pressure (pressure >21 mmHg) for 6 to 8 months after the injection. No other severe complications were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of a visual acuity increase and intraocular pressure rise after high-dosage IVTA in diffuse diabetic macular edema is about 6 to 8 months. Compared with data in the literature, the high-dosage IVTA may not have a markedly higher profile of side effects than low-dosage IVTA.

Prospective Evaluation of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Macular Edema Associated with Retinal Vascular Disorders

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in macular edema associated with various retinal vascular disorders.

Methods

This prospective nonrandomized clinical interventional study included 81 eyes (76 patients) comprised of Group I, 57 eyes (51 patients) with diabetic macular edema; Group II, 10 eyes (10 patients) with branch retinal vein occlusion; and Group III, 13 eyes (13 patients) with central retinal vein occlusion. All eyes received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide (with the solvent) in the operation theater under sterile conditions.

Results

Mean preinjection central macular thickness was 531.84±132 μm in Group I, 458.4±149 μm in Group II, and 750.81±148 μm in Group III. All groups showed a statistically significant decrease in mean central macular thickness at 1 month (300.7±119 μM in Group I, 218.2±99 μm in Group II, and 210.5 ±56 μm in Group III) and 3 months (253.19±109 μm in Group I, 187±47 μm in Group II, and 182±50 μm in Group III) after injection (p<0.05). Mean follow-up was 22±2.4 weeks. Mean visual acuity increased in all three groups (preoperative visual acuity in Group I, 1.2±0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 1.24±0.5 logMAR units; Group III, 1.1 ±0.4 logMAR units; 1 month postinjection in Group I, 0.88±0.3 logMAR units; Group II, 0.67±0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.86±0.4 logMAR units; 3 months postinjection in Group I, 0.84±0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 0.59±0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.82±0.5 logMAR units) (p<0.05). Forty-one eyes completed 6 months and 20 eyes completed 9 months follow-up. Twelve of 20 (41%) eyes in Group I, 2/6 (33%) eyes in Group II, 3/6 (50%) eyes in Group III, and 8/15 (53%) eyes in Group I, 1/3 (33%) eyes in Group II, and 2/2 (100%) eyes in Group III developed recurrence of macular edema with worsening of visual acuity at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Thirty-three (40.7%) eyes developed IOP elevation (at least one reading > 24 mmHg). One eye developed infective endophthalmitis.

Conclusions

Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be considered as an effective treatment for reducing macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema, venous occlusion associated macular edema, and may result in increase in visual acuity at least in the short term. Further follow-up and analysis is required to demonstrate its long-term efficacy.

PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Synthesis of Safety Literature

PURPOSE

To assess the risk and benefit of pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Database of Controlled Trials until September 2014. The population was patients with diabetic macular edema, intervention vitrectomy, comparator macular laser or observation, and efficacy outcome visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Safety outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications. The efficacy meta-analysis included only randomized controlled trials. The safety analysis included prospective, retrospective, controlled, and uncontrolled studies.

RESULTS

Five studies were eligible for the efficacy meta-analysis (n = 127 eyes) and 40 for the safety analysis (n = 1,562 eyes). Combining follow-up intervals from 6 to 12 months, the meta-analysis found a nonsignificant 2 letter visual acuity difference favoring vitrectomy, and a significant 102 μm greater reduction in central retinal thickness favoring vitrectomy, but a post hoc subgroup analysis found that a 6-month central retinal thickness benefit reversed by 12 months. The most frequent complications were retinal break (7.1%), elevated intraocular pressure (5.2%), epiretinal membrane (3.3%), and vitreous hemorrhage (2.4%). Cataract developed in 68.6% of 121 phakic eyes.

CONCLUSION

Vitrectomy produces structural and functional improvements in select eyes with diabetic macular edema, but the visual gains are not significantly better than with laser or observation. No major safety concerns were identified.

Combined Phacoemulsification and Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex®) in Diabetic Patients with Coexisting Cataract and Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of combined phacoemulsification and dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with cataract and diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

In this two-center, retrospective, single-group study, the charts of 16 consecutive patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification and intravitreal dexamethasone implant were retrospectively reviewed. These 16 patients, 7 men and 9 women, were observed at least 3 months of follow-up. Primary outcome was the change of the central retinal thickness (CRT); secondary outcome was the change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Any ocular complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean CRT decreased significantly from 486 ± 152.4 μm at baseline to 365.5 ± 91 μm at 30 days (p = .005), to 326 ± 80 μm at 60 days (p = .0004), and to 362 ± 134 μm at 90 days (p = .001). Mean BCVA was 20/105 (logMAR, 0.72 ± 0.34) at baseline and improved significantly (p ≤ .007) at all postsurgery time points. One case of ocular hypertension was observed and successfully managed with topical therapy. No endophthalmitis or other ocular complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal slow-release dexamethasone implant combined with cataract surgery may be an effective approach on morphologic and functional outcomes for patients with cataract and diabetic macular edema for at least three months after surgery.

Effect of BTXA on Inhibiting Hypertrophic Scar Formation in a Rabbit Ear Model

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a refractory skin disease caused by major physical damage or other inflammation. Some reports found that botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) could be an alternative treatment of the HS. Therefore, the authors studied the effects of BTXA on the treatment of HS and the dose response of BTXA.

METHODS

Hypertrophic scars were harvested from the ears of 18 young adult New Zealand big-eared rabbits and treated with BTXA or triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in vivo experiment. The hypertrophic index (HI) was measured by histological examination. Collagen fibrils were checked by sirius red straining, and the cell nucleuses of fibroblasts were checked by Ki67.

RESULTS

The HI of hypertrophic scars with BTXA treatment was lower than that with phosphate-buffered saline treatment (P < 0.05). Compared with the TAC treatment group, the efficacy of treatment with the middle dose of BTXA (1.0, 1.5 IU) had no significant difference, as shown by sirius red staining and immunohistochemistry Ki67.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that BTXA effectively improved the appearance of hypertrophic scars and inhibited the formation of collagen fibrils and fibroblasts in vivo. Treatment with the middle dose of BTXA achieved similar efficacy as TAC treatment, indicating that BTXA might be useful for inhibiting hypertrophic scars and worth investigating further.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants for Treatment of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implants in eyes with diabetic macular edema that did not respond to previous treatment.

Methods

We included 46 eyes of 46 patients in this retrospective study. Each month, we recorded patient visual acuity with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, central macular thickness measurements with optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure (IOP), and posttreatment complication occurrence.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 8.95 ± 1.33 months (range, 6 to 12). Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly in the first 4 months after IVD, but no statistically significant change was observed over the following 2 months. Although a statistically significant decrease in central macular thickness was observed in the first 3 months, the change was not statistically significant in the following 3 months. There was a statistically significant increase in IOP in the first 2 months, but no statistically significant change was observed in the following months. IOP was controlled with medication in all patients with elevated IOP. Of the 26 phakic patients, two had cataracts requiring surgery.

Conclusions

Cases of refractory diabetic macular edema that did not respond to previous treatment, such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and laser photocoagulation, exhibited improvements in visual acuity and decreases in retinal thickness after IVD implantation. Both functional and anatomical effects were observed in the first 3 months after injection. Repeat injections and frequent examination might be required for continued improvement. Side effects, such as cataracts and elevation of IOP, may require medical or surgical treatment.

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Practice Guidelines: Customized for Iranian Population

PURPOSE

To customize clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the Iranian population.

METHODS

Three DR CPGs (The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2013, American Academy of Ophthalmology [Preferred Practice Pattern 2012], and Australian Diabetes Society 2008) were selected from the literature using the AGREE tool. Clinical questions were designed and summarized into four tables by the customization team. The components of the clinical questions along with pertinent recommendations extracted from the above-mentioned CPGs; details of the supporting articles and their levels of evidence; clinical recommendations considering clinical benefits, cost and side effects; and revised recommendations based on customization capability (applicability, acceptability, external validity) were recorded in 4 tables, respectively. Customized recommendations were sent to the faculty members of all universities across the country to score the recommendations from 1 to 9.

RESULTS

Agreed recommendations were accepted as the final recommendations while the non-agreed ones were approved after revision. Eventually, 29 customized recommendations under three major categories consisting of screening, diagnosis and treatment of DR were developed along with their sources and levels of evidence.

CONCLUSION

This customized CPGs for management of DR can be used to standardize the referral pathway, diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Update on corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) remains an important cause of visual loss. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are generally used as first-line treatments for patients with center-involving DME, there is an important role for corticosteroids as well. Corticosteroids may be especially useful in pseudophakic patients poorly responsive to anti-VEGF therapies, in patients wishing to reduce the number of required injections, and in pregnant patients. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide has been used for many years but is not approved for this indication. An extended-release bioerodable dexamethasone delivery system and an extended-release nonbioerodable fluocinolone acetonide insert have both achieved regulatory approval for the treatment of DME. All intravitreal corticosteroids are associated with risks of cataract progression, elevation of intraocular pressure, and endophthalmitis. There is no current consensus regarding the use of corticosteroids, but they are valuable for selected patients with center-involving DME.

Updates on the Clinical Trials in Diabetic Macular Edema

In this era of evidence-based medicine, significant progress has been made in the field of pharmacotherapeutics for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). A. number of landmark clinical trials have provided strong evidence of the safety and efficacy of agents such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for the treatment of DME. Decades of clinical research, ranging from the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study to the present-day randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing novel agents, have shifted the goal of therapy from preventing vision loss to ensuring a maximum visual gain. Systematic study designs have provided robust data with an attempt to optimize the treatment regimens including the choice of the agent and timing of therapy. However, due to a number of challenges in the management of DME with approved agents, further studies are needed. For the purpose of this review, an extensive database search in English language was performed to identify prospective, RCTs testing pharmacological agents for DME. In order to acquaint the reader with the most relevant data from these clinical trials, this review focuses on pharmacological agents that are currently approved or have widespread applications in the management of DME. An update on clinical trials presently underway for DME has also been provided.

The effect of triamcinolone acetonide or bevacizumab on the levels of proinflammatory cytokines after retinal laser photocoagulation in pigmented rabbits

Although laser photocoagulation is a gold standard for the treatment of retinal ischemic diseases, thermal burn induces the inflammation and the progression of macular edema. To prevent this complication, combination therapy using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs or steroids is clinically utilized, however the mechanisms are still unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the changes in inflammatory and angiogenic cytokine levels in aqueous humor and vitreous body after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) or triamcinolone (IVTA), as well as sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone (STTA) after retinal laser photocoagulation in rabbits. Pigmented rabbits were treated with retinal laser photocoagulation and divided into 4 groups, namely Control (no additional treatment), IVB, IVTA or STTA accordingly. Samples of vitreous and aqueous humor were collected on post-treatment days 0, 1, 7 and 14. The levels of intraocular VEGF, interleukin-6 (IL-6), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) were measured using an immunoassay. The levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1 and MCP-1 were significantly elevated 1 day after laser treatment. IVTA and STTA significantly reduced the increase in the levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1 and MCP-1, while IVB reduced that of VEGF only in aqueous humor and vitreous body. The protein amount in the aqueous humor transiently increased 1 day after laser, and was significantly prevented by IVTA or STTA but not IVB. Data showed that bevacizumab only reduced intraocular VEGF after laser, while triamcinolone suppressed both the expression of VEGF and proinflammatory cytokines. We propose that these cytokine profiles may play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammation after photocoagulation and the underlying mechanism of treatment with anti-VEGF drug and steroids.

Efficacy and safety of postvitrectomy intravitreal triamcinolone therapy for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

After vitrectomy, diffusion and clearance rates of numerous drugs are increased, leading to a shorter intravitreal half-life. This raises doubts about the efficacy of intravitreal therapies, as retina specialists generally believe that a shorter half-life compromises the drugs' therapeutic effect. We conducted a study to evaluate the functional and anatomical effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide therapy (IVTA) in previously vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter case series study including vitrectomized patients with DME who underwent IVTA injections, central macular thickness (CMT) measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters were evaluated after each procedure. All relevant medical data were collected, including previous ophthalmologic treatments and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Twenty vitrectomized eyes of 20 patients, mean age 58.1 years (range 40-72 years), were enrolled in the study. All patients presented DME and received at least one IVTA injection. Mean time between pars plana vitrectomy and IVTA was 12.9 ± 8.7 months. Mean pretreatment and posttreatment CMT was 438.8 ± 90.8 μm and 301.2 ± 76.2 μm, respectively, a difference that reached statistical significance (p&lt;0.001). Mean gain in BCVA letter score was 7.83 ± 14.9 letters after treatment (p = 0.039). Mean intraocular pressure was significantly increased after IVTA (17.2 ± 1.9 mm Hg at baseline vs 21.2 ± 4.59 mm Hg after IVTA, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive anatomical and functional effect was observed in our cohort. Our results suggest that, despite prior vitrectomy, triamcinolone remains a valid therapeutic approach for eyes with persistent DME. Further prospective randomized studies with larger patient samples are needed to validate this conclusion.

Factors correlated with the resolution of macular oedema after one dose injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide treatment in branch retinal vein occlusion

Objective

To investigate the predictive baseline factors for a successful outcome following one dose of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in patients with macular oedema (ME) caused by branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients with ME (macular retinal thickness [MRT] ≥ 300 µm) due to BRVO who still had ME 3 months after grid laser photocoagulation. Patients were divided according to treatment into an IVTA group and a laser-only group. The resolution of ME was documented at months 3 and 6.

Results

A total of 154 eyes with ME were investigated: IVTA group (90 eyes) and laser-only group (64 eyes). Predictive factors for successful IVTA treatment were younger age, shorter duration of ME, initial onset ME, accompanied by serous retinal detachment, few concomitant systemic diseases and nonischaemic BRVO. A broken foveal capillary ring was related to a poor treatment outcome. Eyes with cystoid spaces in the outer plexiform layer were more likely to have a good treatment response.

Conclusion

IVTA is effective for resolving ME due to BRVO after grid laser photocoagulation treatment.

The combination of phacoemulsification surgery and intravitreal triamcinolone injection in patients with cataract and diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficiency of combined phacoemulsification (PHACO) surgery and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) injection with or without macular grid laser photocoagulation in patients with cataract and diabetic macular edema.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 41 eyes of 36 diabetic patients with cataract and coexisting clinically significant macular edema (CSME). After PHACO and IVTA injection eyes were divided into two groups: the laser and IVTA group (Group 1) and only IVTA group (Group 2). Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. Paired sample t-test was used to compare data in the groups and C square test for qualitative variables.

RESULTS

Postoperative BCVA was significantly higher than the initial BCVA during the follow-up period in both groups (p < 0.01). The BCVA 6 months after surgery was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in IOP between two groups preoperatively and postoperatively during the follow-up period (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in mean CMT preoperatively and 2nd week, 2nd month and 3rd month after surgery (p > 0.05). The mean CMT 6 months after surgery was statistically significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PHACO surgery combined with IVTA injection improves BCVA and provides a decrease in CMT in diabetic patients with CSME. Additional macular grid laser photocoagulation after surgery helps to preserve this improvement in BCVA and decrease in CMT.

INTRAVITREAL CORTICOSTEROIDS IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS

PURPOSE

To review the relationship between kinetics, efficacy, and safety of several corticosteroid formulations for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

Reports of corticosteroid use for the treatment of diabetic macular edema were identified by a literature search, which focused on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of these agents in preclinical animal models and clinical trials.

RESULTS

Available corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema treatment include intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, dexamethasone, and fluocinolone acetonide. Because of differences in solubility and bioavailability, various delivery mechanisms are used. Bioerodible delivery systems achieve higher maximum concentrations than nonbioerodible formulations. There is a relationship between visual gains and drug persistence in the intravitreal compartment. Safety effects were more complex; level of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide exposure is related to development of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract; this does not seem to be the case for dexamethasone, where two different doses showed similar mean intraocular pressure and incidence of cataract surgery. With fluocinolone acetonide, rates of intraocular pressure elevations requiring surgery seem to be dose related; rates of cataract extraction were similar regardless of dose.

CONCLUSION

Available corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema exhibit different pharmacokinetic profiles that impact efficacy and adverse events and should be taken into account when developing individualized treatment plans.

Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of a single dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Dex-I) injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of 39 eyes (34 consecutive patients). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) (>24 mm Hg) were analyzed before treatment and 2 and 4 months after injection.

Results

Preoperative mean CMT was 559 ± 111 μm and decreased to 338 ± 84 and 477 ± 140 μm 2 and 4 months after injection, respectively. Although all eyes showed a significant decrease in CMT 2 months after injection (p<0.0001), a recurrence of the macular edema was observed 4 months after injection in 79% of eyes. Mean BCVA improvement (logMAR) was 0.13 ± 0.18 (p<0.0001) and 0.07 ± 0.21 (p = 0.049) 2 and 4 months after injection, respectively, without significant difference between vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Eight eyes (21%) developed reversible increase in IOP 2 months after injection.

Conclusions

Thirty percent of DME eyes had gained more than 2 logMAR lines 2 months after Dex-I injection and safety was good. Visual acuity gain was maintained 4 months after injection despite a recurrence of edema in most cases.