Testability of the Retinomax autorefractor and IOLMaster in preschool children: the Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study

Noncycloplegic Compared with Cycloplegic Refraction in a Chicago School-Aged Population

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences between autorefraction measurements with and without cycloplegia among school-aged individuals and to explore factors associated with significant differences.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals between 3 and 22 years of age evaluated at the Illinois College of Optometry from September 2016 through June 2019 who underwent same-day noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction of the right eye.

METHODS

Demographic information including age, sex, and race or ethnicity were collected during the eye examination. Autorefraction was performed before and after cycloplegia. Myopia, defined as at least -0.50 diopter (D) spherical equivalent (SE), hyperopia, defined as at least +0.50 D SE, and astigmatism of at least 1.00 D cylinder were determined using noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefractions. Factors associated with at least 1.00 D more myopic SE or at least 0.75 D cylindrical difference by noncycloplegic autorefraction were assessed using logistic regression models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements.

RESULTS

The mean age was 10.8 ± 4.0 years for the 11 119 individuals; 52.4% of participants were female. Noncycloplegic SE measured 0.65 ± 1.04 D more myopic than cycloplegic SE. After adjusting for demographic factors and refractive error, individuals with at least 1.00 D of more myopic SE refraction by noncycloplegic autorefraction (25.9%) were more likely to be younger than 5 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.79) and 5 to younger than 10 years (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.48) than those 10 to younger than 15 years. This difference of at least 1.00 D of more myopic SE was more likely to be observed in Hispanic people (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.36) and those with hyperopia (OR range, 4.20-13.31). Individuals with 0.75 D or more of cylindrical difference (5.1%) between refractions were more likely to be younger than 5 years, to be male, and to have mild-moderate-high myopia or moderate-high hyperopia.

CONCLUSIONS

Three quarters of school-aged individuals had < 1 D of myopic SE difference using noncycloplegic compared with cycloplegic autorefraction. Understanding measurement differences obtained for refractive error and associated factors may provide useful information for future studies or programs involving refraction in school-aged children.

AAPOS uniform guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screen validation 2021

BACKGROUND

As instrument-based pediatric vision screening technology has evolved, the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) has developed uniform guidelines (2003, updated 2013) to inform the development of devices that can detect specified target levels of amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) and visually significant refractive error. Clinical experience with the established guidelines has revealed an apparent high level of over-referral for non-amblyopic, symmetric astigmatism, prompting the current revision.

METHODS

The revised guidelines reflect the expert consensus of the AAPOS Vision Screening and Research Committees.

RESULTS

For studies of automated screening devices, AAPOS in 2021 recommends that the gold-standard confirmatory comprehensive examination failure levels include anisometropia >1.25 D and hyperopia >4.0 D. Astigmatism >3.0 D in any meridian and myopia < -3 D should be detected in children <48 months, whereas astigmatism >1.75 D and myopia < -2 D should be detected after 48 months. Any media opacity >1 mm and manifest strabismus of >8^Δ should also be identified. Along with performance in detecting ARFs and refractive error, validation studies should also report screening instrument performance with regard to presence or absence of amblyopia. Instrument receiver operating characteristic curves and Bland-Altman analysis are suggested to improve comparability of validation studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination failure criteria have been simplified and the threshold for symmetric astigmatism raised compared to the 2013 guidelines, whereas the threshold for amblyogenic anisometropia has been decreased. After age 4 years, lower magnitudes of symmetric astigmatism and myopia are also targeted despite a low risk of amblyopia, because they can influence school performance and may warrant consideration of myopia prevention therapy.

An evaluation of the IOLMaster 700 and its agreement with the IOLMaster v3 in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the swept-source optical coherence tomographer Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and compare its outputs with those obtained using partial coherence interferometry (Zeiss IOLMaster v3) in a healthy, paediatric population.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, observational study. Examiner 1 took two sets of biometric measurements (axial length [AL], mean corneal radius of curvature [K_mean ], anterior chamber depth [ACD] and lens thickness [LT]) using the IOLMaster 700, and one set of measurements (AL, K_mean and ACD) using the IOLMaster v3. Examiner 2 took one full set of measurements using the IOLMaster 700. Mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated, and Bland and Altman plots used to explore repeatability and reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 alongside establishing its agreement with the IOLMaster v3.

RESULTS

Mean participant age was 7.52 ± 0.58 years. Repeatability analyses demonstrated small mean differences and narrow 95% LOA for AL (0.001, -0.013 to 0.015 mm), K_mean (0.002, -0.020 to 0.024 mm), ACD (-0.003, -0.031 to 0.024 mm) and LT (0.001, -0.024 to 0.026 mm), respectively. Similarly, small mean differences and narrow 95% LOA established excellent reproducibility (AL 0.001, -0.016 to 0.018 mm; K_mean -0.001, -0.027 to 0.025 mm; ACD -0.010, -0.041 to 0.021 mm; LT 0.002, -0.016 to 0.020 mm). The IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster v3 demonstrated good agreement with small mean differences and narrow 95% LOA (AL 0.009, -0.034 to 0.052 mm; K_mean 0.016, -0.013 to 0.044 mm; ACD 0.134, 0.055 to 0.212 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

When used within a paediatric population, these data demonstrate the IOLMaster 700 to be highly repeatable and reproducible for measures of AL, K_mean , ACD and LT. There is excellent inter-instrument agreement between the IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster v3 for measures of AL and K_mean . ACD measurements show weaker agreement. These data will be useful when considering reports from population-based studies of refractive error and clinical myopia research.

Prediction of premyopia and myopia in Chinese preschool children: a longitudinal cohort

BACKGROUNDS

Myopia has become a global public health problem. Children with early onset of myopia are at particular risk of complications associated with myopia. Younger children and children with greater initial myopic refractive errors are at a greater risk of myopia progression. Therefore, it is essential to identify subjects at high risk of developing myopia to facilitate myopia prevention in the early stage, especially during the preschool period. The purpose of this study was to determine whether premyopia and myopia in preschool children can be predicted by easily obtainable parameters.

METHODS

Data was collected in a population-based cohort. Comprehensive examinations included height, weight, refraction, axial length (AL), and corneal radius of curvature (CR), with a follow-up of 2 years. Parental myopia history was obtained from a questionnaire. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ - 0.50 D. Premyopia was defined as - 0.50 D < SE ≤ + 0.75 D. Multivariate linear regression models were fitted to determine the associations between these parameters at baseline and future SE. To predict premyopia and myopia, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis coupled with a nomogram was used.

RESULTS

A total of 830 children (433 boys and 397 girls) were included (40.83 ± 3.43 months old at baseline). A significantly negative relationship was observed in the multivariate analysis between baseline AL, AL/CR, two myopic parents, and the future SE after adjusting for age and gender (coefficient = - 0.291, coefficient = - 5.791, coefficient = - 0.273, respectively, both p <  0.001). Higher baseline AL, AL/CR (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.916, HR = 2.979, respectively, comparing the top quartile with the bottom quartile, both p <  0.001) and two myopic parents (HR = 1.756, compared to no myopic parents, p = 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of future onset of premyopia. From the nomogram, AL/CR was found to have the most enormous effect on survival. Different baseline AL and AL/CR values (both Log Rank p <  0.001) had different survival curves.

CONCLUSIONS

AL and AL/CR could be used as obtainable indicators for identifying subjects at high risk of developing premyopia and myopia in young preschool children.

Comparison of keratometry data using handheld and table-mounted instruments in healthy adults

PURPOSE

To compare keratometry data between the handheld Retinomax K-plus 3 and the table-mounted IOLMaster 700.

METHODS

Healthy adult volunteers were prospectively recruited to the study. All participants underwent 3 consecutive keratometry measurements using the Retinomax K-plus 3 and a single biometry assessment using the IOLMaster 700. Differences between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 were assessed using Wilcoxon test for paired samples, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman and mountain plots.

RESULT

Twenty-eight healthy subjects with a median age of 37 years (interquartile range (IQR) 28-44 years) were included in the study. The median mean keratometry (mean K) reading was higher using the Retinomax K-plus 3 (44.04D; IQR 42.96-45.61D) compared to the IOLMaster 700 (43.78D; IQR 43.22-44.90D, p < 0.01), with a mean difference of 0.18D (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.23D). Mean K readings were highly correlated between the 2 devices (r = 0.995, p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% limits of agreement between -0.14D and 0.49D. Frequency histogram of mean K reading differences between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 showed that 56% of cases were between ± 0.2D, 93% of cases were between ± 0.4D and all cases were between ± 0.5D. Mean corneal astigmatism measurement was higher using the Retinomax K-plus 3 (1.01 ± 0.40D) compared to the IOLMaster 700 (0.77 ± 0.36D), with a mean difference of 0.23 ± 0.37D (p < 0.01) between the devices.

CONCLUSIONS

A good agreement exists between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 regarding keratometry readings. This enables cataract surgeons to safely use the Retinomax K-plus 3 device when indicated.

Meta-analysis of ocular axial length in newborns and infants up to 3 years of age

In pediatric ophthalmology it is often necessary to obtain axial length in young children. For children older than 3 years, noncontact biometry can be used. For younger children this is usually not an option, and the clinician needs to rely on other imaging modalities. Depicted data curves in textbooks elaborate on few studies and limited number of subjects. The existing literature regarding normal axial length for preterm infants and term newborns is summarized and critically appraised for number of subjects, relevance, measurement method and error, gender and retinopathy of prematurity. We obtained axial length measurements for a total number of 6,575 eyes in 27 papers published from 1964 to 2018 (9 papers with 2,272 eyes for preterm children, 24 papers with 4,303 eyes for term children). Initially, axial length increases rapidly: from a mean 5.1-16.2 mm in week 12 to week 37 gestational age. From 38 weeks, growth rate decreases from 16.2 mm to a mean of 21.8 mm at 3 years old. Male infants have a larger average axial length than females at birth; the difference is 0.24 mm (95%CI: 0.15-0.33, P < 0.001). We present a useful growth curve and formula that may serve as a reference for diagnosing abnormal growth.

Performance of Glow Fixation GoCheck Kids and 2WIN Photoscreeners and Retinomax to Uncover Hyperopia

Background

A low-detail, glowing fixation device was added to GoCheck Kids (GCK) photoscreener in the hope of unmasking hyperopia and amblyopia risk factors (ARF).

Methods

Pediatric eye patients were screened by GCK and 2WIN photoscreeners, and Retinomax autorefractor before being compared to AAPOS ARFs.

Results

Screening was attempted by 131 children who then had school bus accommodation-relaxing skiascopy (SBA-RS) before cycloplegic examination. By 2013 AAPOS uniform guidelines, sensitivity/specificity for GCK was 87%/68%, for 2WIN 87%/71% and for Retinomax 79%/68%. Detection of amblyopia had sensitivity/specificity by GCK of 78%/63%, for 2WIN 79%/65% and for Retinomax 77%/68%. Inconclusive screens were seven for GCK, six for 2WIN and 13 for Retinomax. Mean hyperopia for GCK (+2.49±0.74 D) was similar to cycloplegic refraction (+2.93±0.72 D) and SBA-RS (+2.80±0.82 D) while GCK was slightly more than Retinomax (+1.59±0.93 D, p=0.13) but significantly more than 2WIN (+1.02±0.49 D, p<0.01).

Conclusion

GCK, 2WIN and Retinomax had similar validity detecting uniform amblyopia risk factors and amblyopia itself. The nondetailed glow fixation device allowed GCK to uncover substantial hyperopia while the detailed flashing fixation devices on 2WIN and Retinomax seemed to stimulate accommodation in some hyperopic children.

Clinical Trials Registry

NCT04297969. Data Access: http://www.abcd-vision.org/references/GCK%20glow%202WIN%20deidentify.pdf.

Précis

A glow fixation device on a smart phone photoscreener allowed robust detection of hyperopia.

A Comparison of Three Different Photoscreeners in Children

PURPOSE

To compare the results obtained from three non-cycloplegic handheld photorefractometers with cycloplegic autorefractometry (Topcon KR-8100; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) measurement in children.

METHODS

The refractive status of 238 eyes in 119 healthy children was assessed. The values acquired using photorefraction with the non-cycloplegic PlusoptiX A12 (Plusoptix GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany), Retinomax K-plus 3 (Righton, Tokyo, Japan), and Spot Vision Screener (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY) devices were compared with those obtained from the cycloplegic Topcon KR-8100. The agreement between the measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The mean age was 10.1 ± 3.2 years (range: 6 to 17 years). The mean spherical value for the right eyes was 0.38 diopters (D) (range: -4.50 to 6.25 D) for the Plusoptix A12; 0.45 D (range: -4.50 to 6.25 D) for the Spot Vision Screener; -1.15 D (range: -8.75 to 6.50 D) for the Retinomax K-plus 3; and 0.62 (range: -4.50 to 6.00) for the Topcon KR-8100. The mean spherical equivalent value for the right eyes was 0.41 D (range: -4.50 to 7.90 D) for the Plusoptix A12; 0.18 D (range: -4.75 to 6.13 D) for the Spot Vision Screener; -1.30 D (range: -10.50 to 6.38 D) for the Retinomax K-plus 3; and 0.67 D (range: -4.00 to 6.00 D) for the Topcon KR-8100 (for the right eyes).

CONCLUSIONS

The photorefractometer method was beneficial in the measurement of refractive errors of school-aged children. The PlusoptiX A12 photorefractometer method may eliminate the need for cycloplegia in the detection of refractive errors in children. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(5):306-311.].

Primary Care Implementation of Instrument-Based Vision Screening for Young Children

Vision screening for young children can detect conditions that may lead to amblyopia and vision loss if left untreated. Portable vision screening devices with high levels of precision are now available, but their effectiveness in busy primary care settings is unknown. We analyzed the effect of deploying instrument screening devices (SPOT Vision Screener, Welch-Allyn) in 19 pediatric practices. At baseline, using chart-based screening, 65.3% of 3- to 5-year-old children completed screening. A significant increase was observed starting 3 weeks after delivery of devices, and a stable level was reached 12 weeks after implementation, with 86.5% of children completing vision screening ( P = .007 by interrupted time series analysis). Improvement was greatest among 3-year-olds (44.0%-79.8%) but was also seen among 4-year-olds (70.9%-88.4%) and 5-year-olds (80.3%-90.8%). The deployment of vision screening devices in primary care practices substantially improved completed screening among preschool-aged children.

Ocular biometric parameters among 3-year-old Chinese children: testability, distribution and association with anthropometric parameters

This survey was conducted to determine the testability, distribution and associations of ocular biometric parameters in Chinese preschool children. Ocular biometric examinations, including the axial length (AL) and corneal radius of curvature (CR), were conducted on 1,688 3-year-old subjects by using an IOLMaster in August 2015. Anthropometric parameters, including height and weight, were measured according to a standardized protocol, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. The testability was 93.7% for the AL and 78.6% for the CR overall, and both measures improved with age. Girls performed slightly better in AL measurements (P = 0.08), and the difference in CR was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The AL distribution was normal in girls (P = 0.12), whereas it was not in boys (P < 0.05). For CR1, all subgroups presented normal distributions (P = 0.16 for boys; P = 0.20 for girls), but the distribution varied when the subgroups were combined (P < 0.05). CR2 presented a normal distribution (P = 0.11), whereas the AL/CR ratio was abnormal (P < 0.001). Boys exhibited a significantly longer AL, a greater CR and a greater AL/CR ratio than girls (all P < 0.001).

Refraction and visual acuity in a national Danish cohort of 4-year-old children of extremely preterm delivery

PURPOSE

A recent threefold increase in laser treatment for advanced retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) triggered a nationwide preschool ophthalmic and developmental status among extremely preterm survivors. Here, we discuss refraction and visual acuity.

METHODS

Survivors (n = 178) from a national birth cohort (February 2004 to March 2006) of gestational age <28 weeks (PT) and 56 full-term (FT) controls attended for evaluation at age 4 years. Cycloplegic refraction and keratometry were achieved by Retinomax autokeratorefractor and visual acuities by symbol recognition (HOTV, logMAR).

RESULTS

The refractive distribution presented a myopic tail (4.5%) and a hyperopic tail (11.9% ≥+2.5 D) as special preterm features, and corneas were more curved. Astigmatism and anisometropia were only marginally increased, and visual acuities were generally good. Best-corrected binocular median logMAR visual acuity was 0.1 in FT and 0.2 in PT, in Snellen equivalents 0.8 and 0.63. Snellen acuity ≤0.5 occurred across the ROP subgroups, but mainly in those with at least ROP stage 3. Two children had low vision.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall fair outcome for refraction and function is in accordance with other recent northern Europe experience. The results differ in particular from the poorer ophthalmic outcomes reported in the pioneer US treatment studies (cryotherapy for ROP and ETROP). The diode laser ablations (n = 32) appeared effective in our series; except one child, all treated subjects had good or fair social vision at the age of 4 years.

The usefulness of the Retinomax autorefractor for childhood screening validated against a Danish preterm cohort examined at the age of 4 years

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Refractometers have gained a foothold in childhood screening for ophthalmic disorders. Given the results of an ophthalmic follow-up of an extremely preterm Danish cohort, the results of the Retinomax autorefractor were further evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nationwide cohort of infants born before gestational age 28 weeks (n=178) and 56 term controls were examined at the age of 4 years. Refraction was given as the cycloplegic Retinomax value. For this study, we analysed the equipment's confidence value on the printout and equipment-induced myopization (as the difference between refraction measured before and after topical cyclopentholate 1%), both items hypothetical with a view to having identified factual ophthalmic deviations.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 42 eyes with visual acuity ≤0.4 had high Retinomax confidence values (8-9); the Retinomax values were also high in 10 of 12 children with strabismus and lack of stereopsis. Low values (1-6) were recorded in 11 single eyes, 5 of which were normal (false positives). Three children already known to have low vision were unable to cooperate. The overall mean value for equipment-induced myopization was 1.9 D (range, 0-6.87 D). Myopization showed no correlation with visual acuity and corneal curvature, and a weak positive correlation with refractive value disappeared when the myopic outliers were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The hand-held Retinomax seemed to be reliable for assessing refraction in 4-year-old children, provided a cycloplegic agent is applied; if used alone, the Retinomax would have missed several cases of ophthalmic deviation during screening. Equipment-induced myopization was not indicative.

Vision screening for children 36 to <72 months: recommended practices

PURPOSE

This article provides recommendations for screening children aged 36 to younger than 72 months for eye and visual system disorders. The recommendations were developed by the National Expert Panel to the National Center for Children's Vision and Eye Health, sponsored by Prevent Blindness, and funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services. The recommendations describe both best and acceptable practice standards. Targeted vision disorders for screening are primarily amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and associated risk factors. The recommended screening tests are intended for use by lay screeners, nurses, and other personnel who screen children in educational, community, public health, or primary health care settings. Characteristics of children who should be examined by an optometrist or ophthalmologist rather than undergo vision screening are also described.

RESULTS

There are two current best practice vision screening methods for children aged 36 to younger than 72 months: (1) monocular visual acuity testing using single HOTV letters or LEA Symbols surrounded by crowding bars at a 5-ft (1.5 m) test distance, with the child responding by either matching or naming, or (2) instrument-based testing using the Retinomax autorefractor or the SureSight Vision Screener with the Vision in Preschoolers Study data software installed (version 2.24 or 2.25 set to minus cylinder form). Using the Plusoptix Photoscreener is acceptable practice, as is adding stereoacuity testing using the PASS (Preschool Assessment of Stereopsis with a Smile) stereotest as a supplemental procedure to visual acuity testing or autorefraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The National Expert Panel recommends that children aged 36 to younger than 72 months be screened annually (best practice) or at least once (accepted minimum standard) using one of the best practice approaches. Technological updates will be maintained at http://nationalcenter.preventblindness.org.

Video diversion during fundoscopic examination in children: a randomized controlled trial

Fundoscopy is an important aspect of a neurological examination but can be challenging in uncooperative children. This study explored whether viewing a video during examination improves the success, duration, and ease of pediatric fundoscopy. This single-practitioner, randomized study involved 60 patients aged 1 to 8 years. Patients were randomized (by eye examined) to the treatment group (video-assisted) or control group (no video). A caregiver and the practitioner ranked the level of difficulty of each examination. There was a 28% improvement in the success rate of visualizing the optic disc (P < .001). Further analysis showed a 48% improvement in the success rate in children aged 1 to 4 years (P < .001) but no difference in children aged 5 to 8 years (P = .23). Time needed to visualize the optic disc also improved (Δ16.3 s, P < .001). Improvement in the ease of examination (P < .001) was noted by both the practitioner and caregiver. This simple adjunct has the potential to improve the efficacy of this aspect of the pediatric neurological examination.

Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy

AIM

To compare noncycloplegic and cycloplegic results of Retinomax measurements with findings achieved after cycloplegia using table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy.

METHODS

The study included 127 patients (mean age 96.7mo, range 21 to 221). Retinomax (Rmax) (Nikon Inc., Japan) was used to obtain noncycloplegic refraction. Under cycloplegia, refraction was measured with Rmax, table-top autorefractor (TTR) (Nikon NRK 8000, Inc., Japan) and retinoscopy. The values of sphere, spherical equivalent, cylinder and axis of cylinder were recorded for Rmax, TTR and retinoscopy in each eye. All results were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

THE MEAN SPHERIC VALUES (SV), SPHERICAL EQUIVALENT VALUES (SEV) AND CYLINDRICAL VALUES (CV) OF THE NONCYCLOPLEGIC RMAX (SV: 0.64 D, SEV: 0.65 D and CV: 0.03 D, respectively) were found to be significantly lower than cycloplegic TTR (1.43 D, 1.38 D and 0.3 D; P=0.012, P=0.011 and P=0.04, respectively) and retinoscopy (1.34 D, 1.45 D and 0.23 D; P=0.04, P=0.002 and P=0.045, respectively). Mean cycloplegic SV, SEV, CV were not significantly different between Rmax and TTR, Rmax and retinoscopy, TTR and retinoscopy. Cycloplegic or noncycloplegic axis values were not different between any method.

CONCLUSION

Rmax may be used successfully as a screening tool but may not be accurate enough for actual spectacle prescription. Cycloplegic Rmax measurements may be able to identify refractive error in children because of approximate results to retinoscopy.

Failure of stem cell therapy to improve visual acuity in children with optic nerve hypoplasia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of stem cell therapy in improving visual acuity or optic nerve function in children with optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH).

METHODS

Subjects with ONH aged 7-17 years who voluntarily elected to undergo stem cell therapy in China were matched with controls on age, visual acuity, and communication level. Visual acuity, optic nerve size, and sensitivity to light were assessed before stem cell therapy and twice after. Controls were evaluated on the same schedule.

RESULTS

Two case-control pairs were enrolled. There were no clinically significant changes in pupillary constriction or optic nerve measurements in any participant eye. Improvement in visual acuity was noted in study participants regardless of treatment status.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this small sample, there is no evidence that stem cell therapy improves visual acuity in children with ONH.

Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of an open-field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error without cycloplegia in infants and young children.

METHOD

Data included 2698 subject encounters with Native American infants and children aged 6 months to <8 years. We attempted right eye measurements without cycloplegia using the pediatric wavefront evaluator (PeWE) on all participants while they viewed near (50 cm) and distant (2 m) fixation targets. Cycloplegic autorefraction (Rmax [Nikon Retinomax K-plus2]) measurements were obtained for children aged ≥ 3 years.

RESULTS

The success rates of noncycloplegic PeWE measurement for near (70%) and distant targets (56%) significantly improved with age. Significant differences in mean spherical equivalent (M) across near versus distant fixation target conditions were consistent with the difference in accommodative demand. Differences in astigmatism measurements for near versus distant target conditions were not clinically significant. Noncycloplegic PeWE and cycloplegic Rmax measurements of M and astigmatism were strongly correlated. Mean noncycloplegic PeWE M was significantly more myopic or less hyperopic and astigmatism measurements tended to be greater in magnitude compared with cycloplegic Rmax.

CONCLUSIONS

The PeWE tended to overestimate myopia and underestimate hyperopia when cycloplegia was not used. The PeWE is useful for measuring accommodation and astigmatism.

Instrument-based pediatric vision screening policy statement

A policy statement describing the use of automated vision screening technology (instrument-based vision screening) is presented. Screening for amblyogenic refractive error with instrument-based screening is not dependent on behavioral responses of children, as when visual acuity is measured. Instrument-based screening is quick, requires minimal cooperation of the child, and is especially useful in the preverbal, preliterate, or developmentally delayed child. Children younger than 4 years can benefit from instrument-based screening, and visual acuity testing can be used reliably in older children. Adoption of this new technology is highly dependent on third-party payment policies, which could present a significant barrier to adoption.

Update of intraocular lens implantation in children

Cataract is a common problem that affects the vision in children and a major cause of amblyopia in children. However, the management of childhood cataract is tenuous and requires special considerations especially with regard to intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Age at which an IOL can be implanted is a controversial issue. Implanting an IOL in very young children carries the risk of severe postoperative inflammation and posterior capsule opacification that may need other surgeries and may affect the vision permanently. Accuracy of the calculated IOL power is affected by the short eyes and the steep keratometric values at this age. Furthermore, choosing an appropriate IOL power is not a straight forward decision as future growth of the eye affects the axial length and keratometry readings which may result in an unexpected refractive error as children age. The aim of this review is to cover these issues regarding IOL implantation in children; indications, timing of implantation, types of IOLs, site of implantation and the power calculations.

Testability of refraction, stereopsis, and other ocular measures in preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study

PURPOSE

To determine the testability and lower age limits for applying common eye tests to preschool children.

METHODS

Investigators from the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study examined 2,461 children aged 6 to 72 months between 2007 and 2009. Cycloplegic autorefraction was measured with Retinomax and Canon autorefractors. Ocular biometry was measured by the use of IOLMaster in children aged >30 months. The Randot Preschool Stereoacuity test, Lang-Stereotest II, and the Stereo Smile II test were administered to assess stereoacuity. Fundus photography was performed with the subjects' pupils dilated. Testability was defined as the ability to successfully complete tests in both eyes.

RESULTS

There were 2,189 children with complete data. Most were testable with the Retinomax (71.8%) and Canon (66.0%) autorefractors. Testability improved with age (P for trend <0.0001) for both, and Retinomax achieved >70% testability when a subject was 24 months of age, half the age limit (48 months) found for Canon. IOLMaster was mostly testable in children aged 48+ months. Lang-Stereotest II could be used in children aged 6 months and achieved the greatest testability (94.4%) of all stereotests. White children performed better than children of some other ethnicities on Randot (P = 0.007), with girls performing better than boys (P = 0.01). Bilateral photography was achieved in >70% of preschool children 48 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The testability of all measures was strongly age related, with mostly no sex or ethnicity effects found. The handheld Retinomax could be tested in >70% of children aged 24 months, younger than that found for the stationary Canon autorefractor (48 months). Testability measures for most eye tests in this preschool sample are comparable to other preschool studies.

Feasibility and quality of nonmydriatic fundus photography in children

PURPOSE

Ocular funduscopic examination is difficult in young children and is rarely attempted by nonophthalmologists. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of reliably obtaining high-quality nonmydriatic fundus photographs in children.

METHODS

Nonmydriatic fundus photographs were obtained in both eyes of children seen in a pediatric ophthalmology clinic. Ease of fundus photography was recorded on a 10-point Likert scale (10 = very easy). Quality was graded from 1 to 5 (1, inadequate for any diagnostic purpose; 2, unable to exclude all emergent findings; 3, only able to exclude emergent findings; 4, not ideal, but still able to exclude subtle findings; and 5, ideal quality). The primary outcome measure was image quality by age.

RESULTS

A total of 878 photographs of 212 children (median age, 6 years; range, 1-18 years) were included. Photographs of at least one eye were obtained in 190 children (89.6%) and in both eyes in 181 (85.3%). Median rating for ease of photography was 7. Photographs of some clinical value (grade ≥2) were obtained in 33% of children <3 years and 95% ≥3 years. High-quality photographs (grade 4 or 5) were obtained in both eyes in 7% of children <3 years, 57% of children ≥3 to <7 years, 85% of children ≥7 to <9 years, and 65% of children ≥9 years. The youngest patient with high-quality photographs in both eyes was 22 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonmydriatic fundus photographs of adequate quality can be obtained in children over age 3 and in some children as young as 22 months.

Risk factors for hyperopia and myopia in preschool children the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies

PURPOSE

To describe the risk factors associated with hyperopia and myopia among children 6 to 72 months of age.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Population-based samples of 9970 children 6 to 72 months of age from Los Angeles County, California, and Baltimore, Maryland.

METHODS

Participants were preschool African-American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white children (n = 9770) from Los Angeles, California, and Baltimore, Maryland. Parental questionnaires and a comprehensive eye examination were administered. Demographic, behavioral, and clinical risk factors associated with hyperopia (≥2.00 diopters [D]) and myopia (≤-1.00 D) were determined.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios (ORs) for risk factors associated with myopia and hyperopia.

RESULTS

Compared with non-Hispanic whites, African-American (OR, 6.0) and Hispanic (OR, 3.2) children were more likely to be myopic. Children 6 to 35 months of age were more likely to be myopic compared with those 60 to 72 months of age (OR, ≥1.7). Compared with African-American children, non-Hispanic white (OR, 1.63) and Hispanic (OR, 1.49) children were more likely to be hyperopic. Children whose parents had health insurance (OR, 1.5) and those with a history of maternal smoking during pregnancy (OR, 1.4) were more likely to have hyperopia. Astigmatism of 1.5 D or more at any axis was associated with myopia (OR, 4.37) and hyperopia (OR, 1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Children in specific racial or ethnic groups and age groups are at higher risk of having myopia and hyperopia. Cessation of maternal smoking during pregnancy may reduce the risk of hyperopia in these children. Given that both myopia and hyperopia are risk factors for the development of amblyopia and strabismus, these risk factors should be considered when developing guidelines for screening and intervention in preschool children.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Comparison of the Retinomax and Palm-AR Auto-Refractors: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of two handheld auto-refractors, the Retinomax and the Palm-Automatic Refractometer (Palm-AR), for detecting significant vision disorders in pre-school children.

METHODS

Children attending Philadelphia PreKindergarten Head Start were screened with the Retinomax and Palm-AR and underwent a gold standard eye examination. The results of cycloplegic retinoscopy, cover testing, and visual acuity were used to classify children as having normal vision or one of four conditions: amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and reduced visual acuity. Pass/fail criteria for each instrument were selected to maximize overall sensitivity (with specificity set at 90% and at 94%) for detecting targeted disorders. Comparisons of sensitivities between the auto-refractors were performed using the exact McNemar test.

RESULTS

Testability was >99% for both instruments. Test time was similar for the two instruments (median 2 min; p=0.10). At 90% specificity, the sensitivity for detection of one or more targeted conditions was 74% for the Palm-AR and 78% for the Retinomax. At 94% specificity, the sensitivity for detection of one or more targeted conditions was 66% for both the Palm-AR and the Retinomax. At 90% specificity, the sensitivity for detecting significant refractive error was 84% for both auto-refractors, and at 94% specificity, the sensitivity was 76% for the Palm AR and 75% for the Retinomax. There were high correlations between the instruments for sphere (r=0.85) and cylinder (r=0.88) power. The mean difference between instruments was -0.13 diopters (D) (95% limit of agreement: -2.28 to 2.02) for sphere, and -0.15 D (95% limit of agreement: -0.89 to 0.59) for cylinder.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, the Retinomax and Palm-AR appear comparable with respect to testability, sensitivity, and specificity. There was strong agreement in readings of sphere and cylinder indicating that they may perform similarly in a screening setting.

Prevalence of astigmatism in 6- to 72-month-old African American and Hispanic children: the Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study

PURPOSE

To determine the age-, gender-, and ethnicity-specific prevalence of astigmatism in African American and Hispanic children aged 6 to 72 months.

DESIGN

Population-based, cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

The Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study is a population-based evaluation of the prevalence of vision disorders in children ages 6 to 72 months in Los Angeles County, California. Seventy-seven percent of eligible children completed a comprehensive eye examination. This report provides the results from 2994 African American and 3030 Hispanic children.

METHODS

Eligible children in 44 census tracts were identified during an in-home interview and scheduled for a comprehensive eye examination and in-clinic interview. Cycloplegic autorefraction was used to determine refractive error.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of children with astigmatism defined as cylindrical refractive error ≥ 1.50 diopters (D) in the worse eye. The astigmatism type was defined as with-the-rule (WTR) (+ cylinder axis 90 ± 15 degrees) and against-the-rule (ATR) (+ cylinder axis 180 ± 15 degrees); all other orientations were considered oblique (OBL). The prevalence of astigmatism and its types were also determined for worse eye cylindrical refractive error ≥ 3.00 D.

RESULTS

Prevalence of astigmatism ≥ 1.50 D was higher in Hispanic children compared with African American children (16.8% vs. 12.7%, respectively; P<0.0001). Hispanic children also showed a higher prevalence of astigmatism ≥ 3.00 D than African American children (2.9% vs. 1.0% respectively; P<0.0001). The prevalence of astigmatism ≥ 1.50 D showed a significant decreasing trend with age (P<0.0001). The prevalence of WTR, ATR, and OBL astigmatism ≥ 1.50 D was 13.9%, 0.6%, and 2.2%, respectively, in Hispanic children, and 7.8%, 2.2%, and 2.7%, respectively, in African American children.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed ethnicity-related differences in astigmatism prevalence in preschool children. The age-related decrease in astigmatism prevalence in preschool children likely reflects emmetropization.

Partial coherence interferometry versus immersion ultrasonography for axial length measurement in children

PURPOSE

To determine whether measurements obtained by partial coherence interferometry (PCI) correlate well with measurements obtained using immersion ultrasound (US) in children.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

DESIGN

Evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology.

METHODS

The charts of pediatric patients who had cataract surgery from August 2008 to September 2009 were reviewed. Axial length (AL) measurements in the operative eye were obtained using PCI at the preoperative clinic visit and then using immersion US in the operating room before surgery. The data were compared to determine the degree of agreement.

RESULTS

The charts of 18 patients (27 eyes) were reviewed. Preoperative AL measurements by PCI were obtained in 21 eyes (78%). On average, the PCI-measured ALs were 0.1 mm less than the immersion US values (95% confidence interval, -0.2 to -0.1; P = .002). All eyes with an AL of 23.5 mm or less had lower PCI values than immersion US values. There was no systematic pattern of 1 measurement being greater or less than the other in eyes with an AL longer than 23.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a systematic difference in AL measurement between PCI and immersion US, with PCI tending to give lower values, particularly in eyes with an AL of 23.5 mm or less. Depending on the length of the eye, a 0.1 mm error in AL measurement could result in a 0.25 to 0.75 diopter difference in intraocular lens calculation that could be clinically significant in some patients.

Anisometropia in Hispanic and african american infants and young children the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study

PURPOSE

To determine anisometropia prevalence and associated risk factors in Hispanic and African American preschoolers.

DESIGN

Population-based, cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 3030 Hispanic and 2994 African American children aged 6 to 72 months from Inglewood, California.

METHODS

Retinomax autorefraction was performed on all participants after cycloplegia. Anisometropia was defined by difference in spherical equivalent (SE), by difference in plus cylinder in any axis (cylindrical), and by difference in cylinder axis vectors (vertical Jackson cross cylinder vector [J0] and oblique Jackson cross cylinder vector [J45] between the eyes. Strabismus was determined by prism-cover testing. A parental questionnaire explored potential risk factors including developmental delay, prematurity, prenatal exposure, and family history.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anisometropia prevalence stratified by age, gender, and ethnicity. The association of anisometropia with strabismus and other biological risk factors was assessed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SE anisometropia > or =1.0 diopter (D) was 4.3% for Hispanics and 4.2% for African Americans. Prevalence of cylindrical anisometropia > or =1.0 D was 5.6% and 4.5%, respectively. Prevalence of cylindrical or SE anisometropia > or =3.0 D was < or =0.4% for both ethnic groups. Cylinder vector anisometropia > or =0.5 was twice as common as cylindrical anisometropia > or =1.0 D. The SE anisometropia decreased at age 1 year in Hispanics (P = 0.0016) but not African Americans. Cylindrical anisometropia decreased in the first year of life in both ethnic groups (P < or = 0.001). There was no trend in SE or cylindrical anisometropia beyond 1 year of age, but cylinder vector anisometropia steadily decreased beyond 1 year of age in both ethnic groups. Cylinder vector anisometropia was more prevalent among African Americans, but there was no difference in other measurements of anisometropia between ethnic groups. Anisometropia did not vary by gender. Strabismus was associated with all types of anisometropia. No association of anisometropia with gestational age, birth weight, cerebral palsy, family history, or prenatal exposure could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Spherical and cylindrical anisometropia (> or =1.0 D) each affect 4% to 6% of Hispanic and African American preschoolers. Anisometropia > or =3.0 D is rare. Except for cylinder axis vector, the prevalence of anisometropia does not diminish beyond 1 year of age. Strabismus is associated with all forms of anisometropia.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Effect of cycloplegia on axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements in children

BACKGROUND

Cycloplegia has been shown to have no effect on axial length measurement made with the IOLMaster in adults. The current study aimed at evaluating the effect of cycloplegia on axial length and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements made with the IOLMaster and an ultrasonic biometer in children.

METHODS

Pre- and post-cycloplegic axial length and ACD were measured with the IOLMaster followed by the Sonomed A-5500 in 31 children aged from seven to 15 years by the same examiner. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were determined, if there were no significant correlations found between the mean differences and their means.

RESULTS

Seven subjects were excluded. Results from the remaining 24 subjects show that the effects of cycloplegia, instruments, and interaction between cycloplegia and instrument on axial length measurement were insignificant (repeated measure ANOVA F(1,23) < 2.19, p > 0.15). The 95% LoA in cycloplegia were better with the IOLMaster (-0.04 to 0.04 mm) than with the Sonomed A-5500 (-0.13 to 0.14 mm). The 95% LoA between the two instruments were similar with and without cycloplegia (pre-cycloplegia: -0.20 to 0.27 mm; post-cycloplegia: -0.17 to 0.22 mm). There was no significant interaction between cycloplegia and instrument in ACD measurement (repeated measure ANOVA F(1,23)= 0.85, p = 0.37), however, ACD was 0.05 to 0.06 mm shorter before cycloplegia (repeated measure ANOVA F(1,23)= 44.70, p < 0.001) and was 0.06 to 0.08 shorter measured with the IOLMaster (repeated measure ANOVA F(1,23)= 28.81, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Effects of cycloplegia on axial length measurement in children made with IOLMaster and Sonomed A-5500 were insignificant. In contrast, ACD measurement was significantly affected by cycloplegia and different instruments.

Testability of vision and refraction in preschoolers: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error study in singaporean children

PURPOSE

To determine the testability of several vision and refraction tests in preschool-aged children.

DESIGN

Population-based study of Chinese preschool-aged children in Singapore.

METHODS

One thousand five hundred and forty-two Singaporean Chinese children aged 6 to 72 months were recruited through door-to-door screening of government-subsidized apartments in Singapore. Trained eye professionals administered all tests, including monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity with the Sheridan Gardiner chart, monocular Ishihara color testing (Richmond Products Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA), biometric measurements using IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), and Randot stereoacuity (Stereo Optical Co, Chicago, Illinois, USA) for children 30 to younger than 72 months. Cycloplegic refraction and keratometry measurements also were determined using a table-mounted autorefractor (Canon Autorefractor RK-F1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) in children 24 to younger than 72 months.

RESULTS

Testabilities were 84.8% for visual acuity (40.7% for age 30 to < 36 months, 70.8% for age 36 to < 42 months, 86.7% for age 42 to < 48 months, 94.8 for age 48 to < 54 months, 98.6 for age 54 to < 66 months, and 98.7% for age 66 to < 72 months), 81.1% for the Ishihara color test, 82.2% for Randot stereoacuity, 62.2% for table mounted autorefraction, and 91.7% for IOLMaster. All testabilities significantly increased with age (P < .0001). Girls had higher testability rates than boys for the autorefraction and Randot stereoacuity tests (P = .036 and .008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The vision and refraction tests were testable in a high proportion of preschool-aged Chinese Singaporeans. Preschool children in older age groups are likely to complete these tests successfully, with important implications for determining age limits for screening in the community and clinic.

Limits on improving the positive predictive value of the Welch Allyn SureSight for preschool vision screening

PURPOSE

To describe our experience using the Welch Allyn SureSight (Welch Allyn, Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY) when vision screening a large population of preschool children. Additionally, we explore the usefulness of altering referral criteria to create high specificity for remote field screening in instances in which over-referral is costly.

METHODS

Preschool children were screened for amblyogenic factors with the SureSight. Referred children received a gold standard examination with American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Vision Screening Committee-established failure criteria. Referral criteria were made increasingly more stringent to lower the rate of referral, and the effect on positive predictive value (PPV) was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 15,749 children were screened, with reliable screening obtained in >99%. Rowatt-modified Vision in Preschoolers Study referral criteria produced a referral rate of 7.3% and a PPV of 48.2%. The PPV was >70% for children with unreliable screenings and with estimated refractive errors exceeding the instrument's range. Altering referral criteria improved PPV until referral rate reached 4% (PPV approximately 64%); further refinement past this level did not increase PPV and, hence, inappropriately limited sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

A good test instrument should have high PPV and a referral rate approaching the population disease. Although altering referral criteria to decrease referral rate also decreases sensitivity, it should improve PPV. The presence of an asymptotic limit to PPV means additional improvement in PPV cannot be obtained with this technology. Thus, SureSight's usefulness for high-specificity screening is limited; however, the current referral criteria are sufficient for large screening programs and provide an acceptable referral rate and PPV.