Impact of 3 mm margin on risk of recurrence and survival in oral cancer

Impact of Close Margins on Oral Cancer Outcomes According to the Oral Subsite

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of close margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is controversial. We wished to investigate the impact of close margins on the risk of local recurrence (LR) in OSCC according to the oral subsite.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 342 OSCC patients undergoing primary surgical treatment was conducted. Surgical margins were based on the main specimen and defined as positive (SCC at margins), close (< 5 mm), or clear (≥ 5 mm).

RESULTS

Among tongue SCC cases, both positive (hazard ratio 13.48, 95% CI 2.03, 32.91) and close margins (hazard ratio 3.87, 95% CI 1.31, 11.34) were significantly associated with LR. Tongue margins < 4 mm were associated with higher LR. Among non-tongue SCC cases, only positive margins (hazard ratio 4.10, 95% CI 1.19, 14.21) were associated with LR. Close margins were not significant (hazard ratio 1.59, 95% CI 0.46, 5.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Close margins appear to have a differential impact on LR in OSCC according to the oral subsite.

Cancer Recurrence in Operated Primary Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Seems to Be Independent of the Currently Available Postoperative Therapeutic Approach: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Despite advances in treatment, recurrence rates in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remain high. Prognostic outcomes vary in terms of local recurrence, metastasis, and overall survival. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on OSCC patients who underwent primary surgery at the Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Frankfurt, between January 2014 and December 2020. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, surgical details, intraoperative frozen section results, and recurrence patterns were first assessed for availability. Subsequently, the available data relevant to each endpoint were analyzed. A total of 169 patients were analyzed (mean age: 64 years). The tongue was the most affected site and had the highest recurrence rate, followed by the floor of the mouth. Overall, 24.3% of patients experienced recurrence, with most cases occurring within the first year. T2 tumors had the highest recurrence rates. Between patients with and without adjuvant therapy, recurrence rates were comparable. Positive surgical margins were more common in recurrence cases, but no significant correlation was found between margin status and recurrence in patients without adjuvant therapy. Based on the analyzed data, achieving recurrence-free survival in OSCC does not solely depend on surgical technique or adjuvant therapy. Instead, early recognition of individual tumor characteristics and even tumor biology should guide personalized treatment planning. Notably, tumors of the tongue and floor of the mouth exhibited high recurrence rates regardless of disease stage, raising the question of whether primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could achieve better outcomes than surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of CRT as a first-line treatment for OSCC in these locations.

Oncologic significance of the lateral margin in buccal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the specific oncologic significance of the lateral margin (LM)- the marginal plane closest to skin- in resected buccal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

216 consecutive, treatment naïve patients undergoing primary surgery for buccal cancer were included. Cheek skin was resected based on clinical features of skin or subcutaneous involvement or proximity to oral commissure. Main outcomes were 1) frequency of LM ≤1 mm in relation to other (anterior, posterior, superior and inferior) margins and 2) association of LM ≤1 mm with LRFS and DFS. Secondary outcomes were rate of LM ≤1 mm and size of LM with and without skin resection.

RESULTS

A total of 67 (31 %) patients had one or more margin ≤1 mm, of which LM comprised 36 (54 %). LM ≤1 mm was disproportionately highest among the five marginal planes (p < 0.001) and was independently associated with LRFS and DFS. Both associations held in sensitivity analysis wherein patients with co-existent margin ≤1 mm at any of the other four marginal planes underwent group-wise exclusion. Skin resection and preservation was performed in 61 (28 %) and 155 (72 %) patients respectively. The latter had a higher rate of LM ≤1 mm and smaller LM size (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort study of buccal cancer shows that LM is most prone for ≤1 mm size. LM ≤1 mm predicts worse LRFS and DFS independent of other margins and risk factors. As skin preservation is associated with a higher rate of LM ≤1 mm, surgeons must lower the threshold to encompass more tissue laterally, including skin where appropriate.

Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

Background

The Naples prognostic score (NPS) and its relation to the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have been inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between NPS and the prognosis of postoperative OSCC patients. Additionally, the study sought to develop a new nomogram for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods

The study included 576 OSCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at two hospitals between August 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Subsequently, two nomograms were developed to predict DFS and OS based on these factors and underwent rigorous validation.

Results

The median DFS and OS were 31.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively. Significant differences in DFS and OS were observed among patients with different NPS scores. Adjuvant radiotherapy, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), extranodal extension (ENE), NPS, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical safety margin, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) were identified as independent predictors of DFS and OS. In the training cohort, the nomogram's concordance index (C-index) for predicting DFS and OS was 0.701 and 0.693, respectively. In the validation group, the corresponding values were 0.642 and 0.635, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed a high level of agreement between the model's predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated the nomogram's good clinical utility. Additionally, patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while those in the medium-risk and high-risk group could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Conclusion

NPS significantly influences the prognosis of OSCC patients following surgery. The nomogram developed in this study holds significant clinical application potential. The low-risk subgroup of patients was not required to undergo postoperative radiotherapy.

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and What We Lose During Formalin Fixation: An Evaluation of Changes in Macroscopic Resection Margins Utilizing Virtual Three-Dimensional Imaging Techniques with Analysis Based on 947 Measurements

BACKGROUND

An adequate OSCC macroscopic resection margin (MRM) is essential for effective treatment. This study analyzed the effects of formalin fixation (FF) on the MRM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 42 patients were enrolled in this study. Tumors from the floor of the mouth (FOM; n = 23), the tongue (TC; n = 10), and the maxilla (MT; n = 9) were studied. A 3D scanner was used to create virtual models, and further analysis was conducted according to the established protocol.

RESULTS

The most significant shrinkage was observed in the TC (MRM n = 121; Med. = 1.5 mm; p val. = 7.05 × 10-18), with a maximum shrinkage of 28%. For the FOM (n = 262; Med. = 0.8 mm; p val. = 6.76 × 10-18), the greatest MRM shrinkage was 26%. In the MT group (n = 91; Med. = 0.9 mm; p val. = 2.69 × 10-9), the shrinkage was 18.7%. Among MRMs >8 mm (n = 159), FF led to 58.5% of them shrinking to ≤8 mm, resulting in a false decrease in the safe MRM (p val. = 1.11 × 10-27). Overall, the average shrinkage for all specimens was μ= 2.57 mm (p val. = 8.89 × 10-10) alongside and μ= 2.35 mm (p val. = 4.09 × 10-6) across. The tumors themselves showed minimal changes: μ= 0.69 mm (p val. = 9.73 × 10-3) alongside and μ= 0.8 mm (p val. = 2.52 × 10-7) across.

CONCLUSION

Formalin fixation (FF) caused the shrinkage of the OSCC MRM, particularly in tongue cancers. Even after proper surgical excision in the postoperative results, the number of normal MRMs was underestimated. This should be considered when interpreting the results of surgical treatment. However, FF had a minimal impact on the overall shrinkage of the tumors themselves.

Margin-to-depth ratio as an independent prognostic factor in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of margin-to-depth ratio (MDR) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains unclear, particularly in comparison to traditional margin status. We aimed to examine the association between MDR and clinical outcomes in a large Taiwanese cohort.

METHODS

A total of 18,324 patients with first primary OCSCC were categorized by margin status: positive (1013), <5 mm (8371), and ≥ 5 mm (8940). Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

After excluding patients with positive margins (MDR = 0), the optimal MDR cutoff value for DSS and OS was 0.6. Patients with MDR > 0.6 showed significantly better 5-year DSS and OS rates (87 %, 81 %) compared to those with MDR ≤ 0.6 (71 %, 63 %) and MDR = 0 (53 %, 43 %). Multivariable analysis identified MDR ≤ 0.6 as independently associated with both DSS and OS in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34/1.32). This finding was consistent in the subgroups with surgical margins < 5 mm (HR = 1.39 for DSS and 1.38 for OS) and margins ≥ 5 mm (HR = 1.21 for both DSS and OS). In subgroups with surgical margins < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm, an MDR > 0.6 was associated with better survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An MDR (cutoff: 0.6) is independently associated with prognosis in OCSCC, offering improved risk stratification compared to margin status alone. While MDR may guide surgical margin modification, further research is needed to determine whether MDR could serve as a postoperative indicator for adjuvant therapy in patients with close or clear margins.

Orbital Adipose Tissue: The Optimal Control for Back-Table Fluorescence Imaging of Orbital Tumors

Control tissue is essential for ensuring the precision of semiquantitative analysis in back-table fluorescence imaging. However, there remains a lack of agreement on the appropriate selection of control tissues. To evaluate the back-table fluorescence imaging performance of different normal tissues and identify the optimal normal tissue, a cohort of 39 patients with orbital tumors were enrolled in the study. Prior to surgery, these patients received indocyanine green (ICG) and following resection, 43 normal control tissues (34 adipose tissues, 3 skin tissues, 3 periosteal tissues, and 3 muscle tissues) were examined using back-table fluorescence imaging. The skin tissue demonstrated significantly elevated fluorescence intensity in comparison to the diseased tissue, whereas the muscle tissue exhibited a broad range and standard deviation of fluorescence signal intensity. Conversely, the adipose and periosteum displayed weak fluorescence signals with a relatively consistent distribution. Additionally, no significant correlations were found between the signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of adipose tissue and patients' ages, genders, weights, disease duration, tumor origins, dosing of administration of ICG infusion, and the time interval between ICG infusion and surgery. However, a positive correlation was observed between the SBR of adipose tissue and its size, with larger adipose tissues (>1 cm) showing an average SBR 27% higher than smaller adipose tissues (≤1 cm). In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrated that adipose tissue consistently exhibited homogeneous hypofluorescence during back-table fluorescence imaging, regardless of patient clinical variables or imaging parameters. The size of the adipose tissue was identified as the primary factor influencing its fluorescence imaging characteristics, supporting its utility as an ideal control tissue for back-table fluorescence imaging.

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

A Matter of Margins in Oral Cancer-How Close Is Enough?

In patients with oral cancer, the risk factors for local, regional, and distant recurrence according to margin status have not been well established. We aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrence by margin status and to identify a margin cut-off point for improved survival in patients with close margins. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients treated at our centre from 2009 to 2021 for primary oral cancer. Margins were classified as positive (<1 mm), close (1 to 4.9 mm), or clear (>5 mm). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 326 patients (210 men) were included. The mean age was 59.1 years. Margin status was close (n = 168, 51.5%), clear (n = 83, 25.4%), or positive (n = 75, 23.0%). In the univariate analysis, positive surgical margins (HR = 7.53) had the greatest impact on distant failure. Positive surgical margins-without nodal involvement-had the greatest impact on the risk of distant failure. In the close margin group, the optimal cut-off for disease-free survival (AUC = 0.58) and overall survival (AUC = 0.63) was a deep margin > 3 mm, with survival outcomes that were comparable to the clear margin group. These finding suggest that margins < 5 mm may be sufficient in certain well-defined cases. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Outcome of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Oral Cancers with Close Margins of Resection

Oral cancers comprise 50% of all head and neck malignancies in India which can be attributed to tobacco chewing. Advanced oral cancers are managed with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or adjuvant chemoradiation. There is paucity of studies regarding need for adjuvant treatment in oral cancers with close margins i.e. ≤ 0.5 cm after formalin fixation. This study aims at documenting the oncological outcome with regards to loco-regional control, disease-free survival, overall survival and complications of adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiation in operated oral cancer patients having close margins of resection. In this Retrospective cohort study, 163 patients with stage T1-T4 oral cancers operated between 2015 and 2019 who have fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, received adjuvant treatment and could be followed up for at least one year were included. At the end of 45 months, the overall survival was 74.7% and disease specific survival was 82.7%. Among the 7 patients who defaulted radiotherapy, 4 patients succumbed to the disease. Complications were bone marrow depression (2 patients), dysphagia (17) and Trismus (1). Adjuvant radiotherapy should be given in oral cancer patients with close margins of resection since it improves the oncological outcome and disease specific survival and the benefit often outweighs the risk.

Surgical Margin Definition and Assessment in Head and Neck Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Head and Neck Surgeons

IMPORTANCE

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are responsible for a significant amount of morbidity and mortality in Canada. Surgical margins are one of the most important factors used to guide treatment; however, currently there is a lack of consensus on the ideal surgical margin definition, sampling, and assessment method.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the current perspectives and practice patterns of Canadian head and neck surgeons with respect to surgical margin: (1) definition, (2) sampling, (3) pathological assessment.

DESIGN

A 24-question cross-sectional survey was sent via email through the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (CSOHNS), and responses were gathered from December 19, 2023, to March 12, 2024. Responses were aggregated and reported using descriptive statistics.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

The survey was conducted in Canada among self-reported staff head and neck oncology surgeons with membership in the CSOHNS.

RESULTS

A total of 36 staff head and neck oncology surgeons responded from across Canada. The most common (58.3%) definition of a negative surgical margin for oral cavity HNSCC was ">5 mm formalin fixed paraffin embedded distance." To obtain surgical margins, surgeons were split with 44.1% using only a tumor bed approach and 32.4% using only a specimen-driven approach. A dedicated head and neck pathologist is always available more commonly for final pathological assessment (63.6%) versus intraoperative frozen section assessment (15.5%). Finally, most surgeons reported having a synoptic standardized reporting system for annotating margin status (78.8%).

CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE

The results of this survey provide a current-state analysis of head and neck surgeons across Canada and set the stage for future efforts to be directed toward standardizing the collection method and reporting criteria for surgical margins in HNSCC.

Clinical Experience with Autofluorescence Guided Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgery

In our study, the effect of the use of autofluorescence (Visually Enhanced Lesion Scope-VELscope) on increasing the success rate of surgical treatment in oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC) was investigated. Our hypothesis was tested on a group of 122 patients suffering from OSCC, randomized into a study and a control group enrolled in our study after meeting the inclusion criteria. The preoperative checkup via VELscope, accompanied by the marking of the range of a loss of fluorescence in the study group, was performed before the surgery. We developed a unique mucosal tattoo marking technique for this purpose. The histopathological results after surgical treatment, i.e., the margin status, were then compared. In the study group, we achieved pathological free margin (pFM) in 55 patients, pathological close margin (pCM) in 6 cases, and we encountered no cases of pathological positive margin (pPM) in the mucosal layer. In comparison, the control group results revealed pPM in 7 cases, pCM in 14 cases, and pFM in 40 of all cases in the mucosal layer. This study demonstrated that preoperative autofluorescence assessment of the mucosal surroundings of OSCC increased the ability to achieve pFM resection 4.8 times in terms of lateral margins.

Treatment of buccal mucosal carcinomas: A survey amongst head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands

Objective

Currently, there is no up-to-date guideline for the treatment of buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to investigate the opinions of Dutch head and neck surgeons on BMSCC of the cheek treatment.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent to all 91 head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands. Their opinions on surgical tumor-free margins, through-and-through defects, and indications for local adjuvant therapy were questioned.

Results

The response rate was 51%. To prevent a through-and-through defect, 67% of the surgeons would accept a deep clinical (macroscopic) margin of ≤5 mm. The less adverse histological characteristics a tumor has, the less consensus there is amongst the surgeons for local adjuvant treatment in case of close margins.

Conclusion

There is no consensus amongst Dutch head and neck surgeons about the optimal treatment for BMSCC of the cheek. There are different opinions on acceptable resection margins, indications for a through-and-through defect, and indications for adjuvant treatment. BMSCC of the cheek treatment should be more uniform and less surgeon dependent.

Level of evidence

N/A.

Stratification of surgical margin distances by the millimeter on local recurrence in oral cavity cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There are limited data supporting the commonly suggested 5 mm margin cutoff as the optimum value in defining clear margins in oral cancer. A database search of Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost was performed from inception to June 2022. A random-effects model was chosen for this meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this study. Seven studies met study criteria (2215 patients). The risk ratio was significantly higher for margins <5 mm when compared to those ≥5 mm (2.09 (95%CI: 1.53-2.86, I2  = 0.47)). Subgroup analysis (I2  = 0.15) of margin distances of 0.0-0.9, 1.0-1.9, 2.0-2.9, 3.0-3.9, and 4.0-4.9 mm calculated risk ratios for local recurrence of 2.96, 2.01, 2.17, 1.8, and 0.98, respectively. Margins between 4.0 and 4.9 mm had similar risk ratios for local recurrence compared to ≥5 mm, while margins <4.0 were significantly higher.

A closer look at the resection margins of buccal mucosa cancer: Their influence on local recurrence free survival

BACKGROUND

The adequate surgical margin for local control of buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) is under debate. This study investigates surgical margins and other factors associated with local recurrence free survival (LRFS) in a large cohort of BMSCC patients.

METHODS

Multiple factors were evaluated retrospectively in 97 patients with BMSCC. Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The local recurrence rate was 23%. The tumor-free margin was <5.0 mm in 89% of the patients and the deep margin was significantly more often inadequate. Multivariate analysis associated pT3-classification, former smokers, tumor-free margin status, and postoperative (chemo)radiation (PO(ch)RT) with local recurrence. Re-resections did not improve LRFS in patients with <5.0 mm tumor-free margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate tumor-free margins are pivotal for LRFS of BMSCC. PO(ch)RT, not re-resection, can improve LRFS in patients with <5.0 mm tumor-free margins.

Ultrasound-guided resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Image-guided surgery could help obtain clear (≥5.0 mm) resection margins. This feasibility study investigated ultrasound-guided resection accuracy of buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC).

METHODS

MRI and ultrasound measurements of tumor thickness were compared to histology in 13 BMSCC-patients. Ultrasound measured margins (at five locations) on the specimen were compared to the corresponding histological margins.

RESULTS

Accuracy of in- and ex-vivo ultrasound (mean deviation from histology: 1.6 mm) for measuring tumor thickness was comparable to MRI (mean deviation from histology: 2.6 mm). The sensitivity to detect clear margins using ex-vivo ultrasound was low (48%). If an ex-vivo ultrasound cutoff of ≥7.5 mm would be used, the sensitivity would increase to 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided resection of BMSCC's is feasible. In- and ex-vivo ultrasound measure tumor thickness in BMSCC accurately. We recommend ≥7.5 mm resection margins on ex-vivo ultrasound to obtain histological clear margins. Additional research is required to establish the effect of 7.5 mm ultrasound cutoff.

Impact of preanalytical freezing delay time on the stability of metabolites in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissue samples

INTRODUCTION

Metabolite stability is critical for tissue metabolomics. However, changes in metabolites in tissues over time from the operating room to the laboratory remain underexplored.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluated the effect of postoperative freezing delay time on the stability of metabolites in normal and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tissues.

METHODS

Tumor and paired normal tissues from five OSCC patients were collected after surgical resection, and samples was sequentially quenched in liquid nitrogen at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 120 min (80 samples). Untargeted metabolic analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry in positive and negative ion modes was used to identify metabolic changes associated with delayed freezing time. The trends of metabolite changes at 30-120 and 30-60 min of delayed freezing were analyzed.

RESULTS

190 metabolites in 36 chemical classes were detected. After delayed freezing for 120 min, approximately 20% of the metabolites changed significantly in normal and tumor tissues, and differences in the metabolites were found in normal and tumor tissues. After a delay of 60 min, 29 metabolites had changed significantly in normal tissues, and 84 metabolites had changed significantly in tumor tissues. In addition, we constructed three tissue freezing schemes based on the observed variation trends in the metabolites.

CONCLUSION

Delayed freezing of tissue samples has a certain impact on the stability of metabolites. For metabolites with significant changes, we suggest that the freezing time of tissues be reasonably selected according to the freezing schemes and the actual clinical situation.

Ultrasound-assisted resection of oral tongue cancer

BACKGROUND

In surgical resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT), achieving clear margins is important for prognosis. Insufficient histopathological margins are common, particularly deep margins.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to determine whether ultrasound (US)-assisted resection could decrease the proportion of insufficient histopathological deep margins in SCCOT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

34 patients with SCCOT undergoing US-assisted resection (study group) were compared to 76 whose resections were performed without US (conventional group). Outcome measures were insufficient deep histopathological resection margins and mean difference in deep margins.

RESULTS

Insufficient deep resection margins (<5.0 mm) were seen in 8 of 34 (23.5%) in the study group, compared to 31 of 76 (40.8%) in the conventional group, unadjusted RR 0.58 [95% CI 0.30-1.12; p = .11], adjusted RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.35-1.92; p = .64]. Unadjusted mean difference was 1.4 mm (95% CI 0.1-2.7, p = .04), adjusted mean difference 1.1 mm (95% CI -2.7 to 0.5, p = .19).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative US can visualize the deep resection margins in T1/T2 SCCOT. US-assisted resection seems to decrease the number of insufficient histopathological deep margins, though the results are not statistically significant. Comparatively good results in the conventional group is one explanation for the lack of significance.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID

NCT04059861.

Clinicopathological characteristics predicting advanced stage and surgical margin invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A single‑center study on 10 years of cancer registry data

The incidence profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has not previously been comprehensively reported in Indonesia. The present study aimed to identify clinicopathological characteristics of patients with OSCC according to sex and age, to analyze histological differentiation patterns specific to tumor subsites, to highlight the role of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in metastasis, and to develop a model to predict advanced stage and margin invasion. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using 581 medical records and pathological specimens from cancer registry data in the Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (Jakarta, Indonesia), between January 2011 and December 2020. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for eligible parameters, identified using bivariate analysis, to predict advanced stage and margin invasion. Calibration of the prediction model was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, its discrimination value assessed using the receiver operating characteristic and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Sex-specific patterns in tumor subsites and differences in clinical staging according to age were demonstrated in the patients with OSCC. The proportion of well-differentiated cases was significantly higher in most tumor subsites, except in the buccal mucosa (more moderately differentiated cases) and floor of the mouth (well and moderately differentiated cases being equal). LVI was significantly associated with nodal metastasis but not distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≤45 years [odds ratio (OR), 2.26] and LVI (OR, 8.42) predicted patients having advanced-stage OSCC among general populations (AUC, 0.773); however, LVI (OR, 8.28) was the sole predictor of advanced stage amongst young patients (AUC, 0.737). Margin invasion was predicted solely by tumor subsite, including mouth not otherwise specified (OR, 3.04) and palate (OR, 6.13), in the general population (AUC, 0.711). Furthermore, margin invasion was predicted by the palate subsite (OR, 38.77) and LVI (OR, 11.61) in young patients (AUC, 0.762). Investigating young patients thoroughly when finding SCC in the mouth and palate, and assessing LVI, especially among young patients, is critical to prevent advanced staging and margin invasion.

Close Surgical Margins in Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer: Do They Impact Prognosis?

Introduction. Mucosal margins exhibit a mean shrinkage of 30−40% after resection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers, and an adequate in situ surgical margin frequently results in a pathological close margin. However, the impact on prognosis remains unclear. We investigated the impact of a pathological close margin on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 418 patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity or oropharynx who underwent initial surgery (with curative intent) at our institute between 2010 and 2016. Results. Of the total population, the pathological marginal status of 290 (69.4%) patients was reported as clear (>5 mm), 61 (14.6%) as close (>1 mm, ≤5 mm), and 67 (16.0%) as positive (≤1 mm). The 5-year DFSs were 79.3%, 65.1%, and 52% in patients in the negative margin (group 1), close margin (group 2), and positive margin (group 3) groups, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was not significant (p = 0.213) but the difference between groups 2 and 3 was (p = 0.034). The 5-year OSs were 79.4%, 84%, and 52.3% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was not significant (p = 0.824) but the difference between groups 2 and 3 was (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, older age, advanced T stage, and a positive margin were independently prognostic of the 5-year DFS and OS. Conclusion. In conclusion, the OS of patients with close margins was no different than that of others when appropriate postoperative adjuvant and/or salvage treatment were/was prescribed. However, we could not determine the impact of close margins on locoregional recurrence given various biases in our study setting. A future prospective study is needed.

Multicentre study on resection margins in carcinoma of the oral cavity, oro-hypopharynx and larynx

Objective

The prognostic significance of the resection margins is still subject of conflicting opinions. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a study on the margins in carcinoma of the oral cavity, oro-hypopharynx and larynx.

Methods

A multicentre prospective study was carried out between 2015 and 2018 with the participation of 10 Italian reference hospitals. The primary objective was to evaluate local control in patients with well-defined clinical characteristics and comprehensive histopathological information.

Results

During the study period, 455 patients were enrolled; the minimum follow-up was 2 years. Previous treatment, grading and fresh specimen examination were identified as risk factors for local control in multivariate analysis. On the basis of these results, it seems possible to delineate “risk profiles” for different oncological outcomes.

Discussion

The prognostic significance of the margins is reduced, and other risk factors emerge, which require diversified treatment and follow-up.

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary treatment with adjuvant therapy, if indicated, reduces the prognostic importance of margins. Collaboration with a pathologist is an additional favourable prognostic factor and quality indicator.

An appendix with literature review is present in the online version.

Comparison of royal college of pathologists and college of american pathologists definition for positive margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pathological margin assessment is an essential component of surgical management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), however, in many studies, variable definitions of involved margins have been used. The purpose of the present study was to compare the prognostic ability of involved margins according to Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidance.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 300 patients with previously untreated OCSCC undergoing definitive surgical management. Main specimen margin status was defined according to RCPath guidance and CAP guidance. "Final margin status", incorporated the results of frozen sections and extra tumour bed resections. The prognostic impact of each margin definition was studied using univariate analysis, and in multivariate models including T-stage (AJCC 8th edition), nodal status (pN+), extranodal extension (ENE), and use of adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Both RCPath and CAP positive margins were associated with local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) on univariate analysis, while final margin status was associated with LR and DSS, but not OS. On multivariate analysis, only CAP positive main specimen margin status was independently associated with LR (odds ratio 2.44, 95% CI 1.37, 4.34), DSS (odds ratio 2.28, 95% CI 1.31, 3.82), and OS (odds ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.04, 2.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Involved main specimen margin as defined by CAP guidance has the advantage of being an independent prognosticator of LR and survival in our cohort.

Trends in Positive Surgical Margins in cT1-T2 Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate trends in contemporary positive surgical margin incidence in cT1-T2 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and to evaluate factors associated with surgical margin status.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of large dataset.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2016, 39,818 patients with cT1 or cT2 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma received primary curative-intent surgery. Positive surgical margins were present in 7.95% of patients, and univariable adjusted probability of positive surgical margins over the study period declined by 1% per year (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.0; P = .049). Multivariable regression revealed the annual rate of positive surgical margins declined significantly (OR, 0.95 per year; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97; P < .001). Factors associated with increased odds of positive surgical margins included cT2 disease, subsite, understaged disease, lymphovascular invasion, tumor grade, and positive lymph nodes. Race and socioeconomic status were not associated with surgical margin status. Treatment at an academic center was associated with increased time to definitive surgery (median 35 days IQR 22-50 vs. median 27 days IQR 14-42; P < .001) and a 20% reduction in positive surgical margin rate (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90; P < .001). Treatment at high-volume centers was less likely to be associated with positive surgical margins (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Surgical subsite, clinical T and N category, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and histologic grade were independent predictors of positive surgical margins. Patients are increasingly being treated at high-volume and academic centers. Overall, the rate of positive surgical margins in cT1-T2 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is decreasing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2022.

Surgical Margin Determination in the Era of HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The goal of head and neck cancer surgery is the complete resection of tumor with a cuff of healthy tissue. A 5-mm margin is optimal but not always achievable in the oropharynx. We aimed to identify a consensus of definition and management of close margins for human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer without other risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive survey.

METHODS

A survey of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) was conducted to evaluate the abovementioned objectives by presenting hypothetical scenarios and asking questions regarding management.

RESULTS

One-hundred fifty-five AHNS members completed the survey (18% response rate). Close margins were defined as <5 mm, <3 mm, and <1 mm by 27.7%, 32.3%, and 32.3% of respondents. There was no significant difference in margin determination with experience level (P = .186). In an HPV-positive tumor with close margins, 51% chose postoperative observation. The remainder chose adjuvant radiation (22.6%), chemoradiation (1.9%), or re-excision of the wound bed (19.4%). There was no association between postoperative close margin management and experience level (P = .80).

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneity exists in the definition and management of close margins in HPV-mediated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC). Establishing a standard regarding close margins in HPV-mediated OPSCC may allow for the optimization of outcomes and help define best practices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Laryngoscope, 131:E2650-E2654, 2021.

A systematic review of therapeutic outcomes following treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the retromolar trigone

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the retromolar trigone (RMT) is a rare but potentially fatal disease that carries a poor prognosis due to its unique anatomic position. RMT SCCs tend to spread to vital nearby structures, including the tonsillar pillar, masticatory muscles, and underlying mandibular bone, even in their early stages, and aggressive treatment is often warranted. This systematic review appraises and qualitatively analyzes all available literature regarding the survival outcomes and prognosis of RMT SCC. Four databases were searched to identify all eligible articles published since January 1980. Of the 1,248 studies, a total of 15 studies representing 4,838 cases met the inclusion criteria. The evaluated patients had a high rate of advanced tumor stage (T3 or T4: 61.4%), lymph node metastasis (38.8%), and mandibular bone invasion (24%) at the time of diagnosis. Aggressive surgical treatments such as lip-splitting (92%), segmental mandibulectomy (61.1%), radical neck dissection (44.1%), and reconstruction using free flaps (49.5%) was undertaken for 92% of the pooled patient population. The mean rates for local, regional, and systemic recurrence were 23.40%, 8.40%, and 8.50%, respectively. The mean 5-year overall survival rate was 38.90%. Osteonecrosis was noted in 11.6% of the 328 patients who received radiotherapy. In conclusion, RMT SCC is generally associated with high recurrence, low survival, and high postoperative complication rates. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are thus warranted. However, significant methodological problems hamper current knowledge. Future studies of this topic that use randomized or cohort designs are thus needed.

Adequate surgical margins for oral cancer: A Taiwan cancer registry national database analysis

BACKGROUND

Margin status and lymph node metastasis are the most important prognostic factors for oral cancers. However, while adequate surgical resection is crucial for local control and prognosis, the definition of clear margins has long been a subject of debate. In this study, we analyzed data from a nationwide population-based cancer registry database and evaluated the impact of surgical margins on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) as well as the optimal cutoff of adequate surgical margins.

METHODS

This analysis included all cases of oral cancer diagnosed from 2011 to 2017 that were reported to the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. The staging system was converted from American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) version 7 to AJCC version 8. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression were performed to identify covariates that were significantly associated with CSS and OS.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2017, 15,654 of a total of 36,091 cases diagnosed with oral cancers were included in the final analyses. Advanced N stage, positive margins, and advanced T stage are the leading risk factors for poor CSS and OS. When surgical margins were subdivided into 1-mm intervals from 5 mm to positive margin, we found that surgical margins <4 mm and <5 mm predict poor CSS and OS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first nationwide, population-based cohort to revisit the question of the adequate surgical margins for oral cancers. We conclude that surgical margins ≥4 mm and ≥5 mm are adequate for good CSS and OS, respectively.