PRAME Immunohistochemistry as an Ancillary Test for the Assessment of Melanocytic Lesions

Digital quantification of Ki67 and PRAME in challenging melanocytic lesions - A novel diagnostic tool

The interpretation of immunohistochemical markers in melanocytic lesions possesses difficulties due to expression in non-melanocytic cells and the time-consuming, non-reproducible nature of manual assessment. A digital tool that accurately quantifies Ki67 and PRAME may valuably aid pathologists in the diagnostic classification of melanocytic lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of digitally quantified Ki67 and PRAME in challenging melanocytic lesions utilizing double nuclear staining methods for accurate identification of melanocytic cells. We explored the difference in Ki67 and PRAME expression by WHO-lesion-groups and Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis version 2.0 (MPATH-Dx V2.0). Tissue slides from a cohort of 156 melanocytic lesions were stained with the Ki67/SOX10 double nuclear stain and the PRAME/SOX10 virtual double nuclear stain. Melanocytic cell specific Ki67/SOX10- and PRAME/SOX10-indexes were quantified by AI-driven digital image analysis (DIA) and compared to non-specific Ki67- and PRAME-indexes. The results showed that ROC AUC of the Ki67/SOX10-index was increased compared to the non-specific Ki67-index (p < 0.001), as opposed to the AUC of the PRAME/SOX10-index compared to non-specific PRAME-index (p = 0.090). The medians of digitally quantified Ki67- and PRAME-indexes differed significantly for the overall WHO-groups and MPATH-Dx V2.0 classes (p < 0.001). In conclusion, we found that double nuclear staining improved the diagnostic performance of Ki67, but not PRAME. The combination of digitally quantified Ki67- and PRAME-indexes may potentially serve as a tool for diagnostic classification of challenging melanocytic lesions. The proposed diagnostic tool presents the results visually, graphically, and quantitatively to optimally aid the pathologist.

PRAME Expression in Melanoma is Negatively Regulated by TET2-Mediated DNA Hydroxymethylation

Preferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) dioxygenase-mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are emerging melanoma biomarkers. We observed an inverse correlation between PRAME expression and 5hmC levels in benign nevi, melanoma in situ, primary invasive melanoma, and metastatic melanomas via immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence: nevi exhibited high 5hmC and low PRAME, whereas melanomas showed the opposite pattern. Single-cell multiplex imaging of melanoma precursors revealed that diminished 5hmC coincides with PRAME upregulation in premalignant cells. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas and Genotype-Tissue Expression databases confirmed a negative relationship between TET2 and PRAME messenger RNA expression in melanoma. Additionally, 5hmC levels were reduced at the PRAME 5' promoter in melanoma compared with nevi, suggesting a role for 5hmC in PRAME transcription. Restoring 5hmC levels via TET2 overexpression notably reduced PRAME expression in melanoma cell lines. These findings establish a function of TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation in regulating PRAME expression and demonstrate epigenetic reprogramming as pivotal in melanoma tumorigenesis.

Prognostic value of PRAME expression in uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Overexpression of Preferentially Expressed Melanoma Antigen (PRAME) is associated with melanoma progression. In the case of uveal melanoma (UM), PRAME expression was identified as conferring a metastatic risk.

AIM

This study aimed to review the available evidence regarding the prognostic value of PRAME expression in UM.

METHODS

This study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included cohort studies and randomised clinical trials. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager V.5.4. Heterogeneity was checked with the I2 test. If there was no heterogeneity, a fixed-effects model was adopted.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. The PRAME+ group showed significant differences in the development of metastases OR (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI): 3.46 (2.84, 4.22). The PRAME+ group had a significantly shorter time to metastasis MD (IV, Random, 95% CI): -28.31 (-55.41, -1.22) and a significantly lower percentage metastasis-free survival at 5-year follow-up MD (IV, Fixed, 95% CI): -21.67 (-25.74,-17.61). PRAME expression was an independent marker for the development of metastatic disease at any follow-up HR (IV, Fixed, 95% CI): 2.00 (1.60, 2.49). In addition, PRAME+tumours were significantly larger than PRAME-tumours MD (IV, Random, 95% CI): 0.22 (0.01, 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

PRAME is a good prognostic marker in UM. We believe that further studies are needed to determine the most cost-effective method for reporting PRAME overexpression.

A Comparative Study Between Copy Number Alterations and PRAME Immunohistochemical Pilot Study in Challenging Melanocytic Lesions

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic uncertainty for ambiguous lesions that fall on the spectrum between nevi and melanoma remains a significant challenge and can have consequences for patient management.

METHODS

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic utility of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry to molecular testing (FISH and SNP array) in 34 diagnostically challenging melanocytic lesions and 9 non-diagnostically challenging melanomas.

RESULTS

We conclude that while PRAME immunohistochemistry demonstrates high specificity (96.2%) in diagnostically challenging melanocytic lesions, its low sensitivity (12.5%) suggests that it should not replace histopathological evaluation in rendering the final diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that PRAME may serve as a useful adjunct in the diagnostic workup, particularly due to its high negative predictive value, but should be used in conjunction with other established diagnostic modalities.

The Relationship of PRAME Expression with Clinicopathologic Parameters and Immunologic Markers in Melanomas: In Silico Analysis

PRAME is a cancer testis antigen whose expression is limited in normal tissues but is increased in cancers. Although there are studies revealing its oncogenic and immunogenic role, the relationship between PRAME expression and immunity in melanomas is not very clear. We aimed to reveal the relationship between PRAME expression and clinicopathologic parameters, immunologic markers, survival in melanomas. PRAME alteration data in TCGA SKCM data set was obtained from cBioPortal. Analyzes regarding clinicopathologic parameters were performed through cBioPortal and UALCAN, survival-related analyzes were performed through cBioPortal, GEPIA2. The correlation analyzes between PRAME expression and immune cell infiltration, immunity-related genes were performed in TIMER2.0, TISIDB, GEPIA2. PRAME protein-protein interaction network was constructed in STRING. The correlated genes with PRAME were listed in LinkedOmics, gene set enrichment and pathway analyses were performed through LinkInterpreter. In cases with low PRAME expression, there was a higher frequency of metastasis and p53 mutation, a more advanced tumor stage and a lower nodal stage. Strong relationship between PRAME expression and immune cell infiltration. A negative correlation was detected between expression of PRAME and many immunomodulatory genes ( P <0.05). Positively correlated genes with PRAME expression were involved in metabolic pathways; negatively correlated genes were involved in pathways related to cell differentiation, immunologic processes. No significant relationship was found between PRAME expression and survival ( P >0.05). Our findings reveal a strong interaction between PRAME expression and tumorigenicity, the immune system and shed light on further clinical studies including PRAME -targeted studies.

Beyond nest size: the clinicopathological spectrum of large nested melanocytic tumours and the value of comparative genomic hybridisation and messenger RNA expression analysis

Large nested melanomas (LNMs) are a rare subtype of naevoid melanoma consisting of large junctional melanocytic nests that are more common in older individuals and/or associated with sun damage. However, the presence of large melanocytic nests alone does not lead to a diagnosis of malignancy, ​as they can also be found in melanocytic naevi. LNMs are challenging because they lack most classic histological features of malignancy and require thorough clinicopathological evaluation. This ambiguity calls for a critical reassessment of the current diagnostic criteria for the subclassification of benign or malignant within the spectrum of large nested melanocytic tumours (LNMTs). Eighteen LNMTs and six special-site melanocytic naevi (SSMNs) ​were studied using different approaches: clinical features, dermoscopy, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) and messenger RNA (mRNA) sequencing analysis, with the aim of identifying novel and reproducible criteria for the recognition of LNMs.Careful clinicopathological evaluation of the 18 LNMTs led to the diagnosis of seven LNMs and 11 large nested melanocytic naevi (LNMNs). Lentiginous spread and nest bridging were significantly associated with LNMs after Holm-Bonferroni correction. Asymmetry, largest nest size, poor lateral demarcation, the number of colours and dermoscopic structures, and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunostaining were more common in LNMs but did not reach statistical significance. Four of seven LNMs and nine of 11 LNMNs lacked the BRAF V600E mutation. Regarding aCGH, no LNMN or SSMN cases had ≥3 copy number variations (CNVs), in contrast to 50% of LNM cases. Importantly, LNM and LNMN could be distinguished by differential mRNA expression of nine genes. Our study demonstrates that there is a spectrum of LNMTs and that the clinicopathological diagnosis of LNM, for which we support the term 'late-onset nested naevoid melanomas', can be significantly strengthened by the presence of lentiginous pattern, nest bridging, gene CNV and differential mRNA expression.

Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma involving the parotid gland with expression of the melanocytic marker PRAME

Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm arising from follicular dendritic cells (FDC) of lymphoid follicles. While the majority of FDC sarcoma cases arise within lymph nodes, approximately 30% manifest in extranodal sites. Only 4 prior occurrences of intra-parotid FDC sarcomas have been documented. We are reporting a rare case of FDC of the parotid gland in a 65-year-old male with a questionable history of B-cell lymphoma. The patient underwent a right total parotidectomy and bilateral neck dissection. A diagnosis of follicular dendritic cell (FDC) sarcoma was made, with one positive intra-parotid node. The malignant cells expressed the characteristic markers for FDC sarcoma but with positivity of the melanocytic marker PRAME. This is a case of FDC sarcoma with an unusual extranodal localization in the parotid gland. Immunohistochemistry was useful in making a diagnosis although the positivity for the melanocytic marker PRAME was unusual and unreported before.

Appropriate Statistical Methods to Assess Cross-study Diagnostic 23-Gene Expression Profile Test Performance for Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Comparing studies of molecular ancillary diagnostic tests for difficult-to-diagnose cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms presents a methodological challenge, given the disparate ways accuracy metrics are calculated. A recent report by Boothby-Shoemaker et al investigating the real-world accuracy of the 23-gene expression profile (23-GEP) test highlights this methodological difficulty, reporting lower accuracy than previously observed. However, their calculation method-with indeterminate test results defined as either false positive or false negative-was different than those used in previous studies. We corrected for these differences and recalculated their reported accuracy metrics in the same manner as the previous studies to enable appropriate comparison with previously published reports. This corrected analysis showed a sensitivity of 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.1%-100%) and specificity of 94.4% (91.6%-96.9%). We then compared these results directly to previous studies with >25 benign and >25 malignant cases with outcomes and/or concordant histopathological diagnosis by ≥3 dermatopathologists. All studies assessed had enrollment imbalances of benign versus malignant patients (0.8-7.0 ratio), so balanced cohorts were resampled according to the lowest common denominator to calculate point estimates and CIs for accuracy metrics. Overall, we found no statistically significant differences in the ranges of 23-GEP sensitivity, 90.4%-96.3% (95% CI, 80.8%-100%), specificity, 87.3%-96.2% (78.2%-100%), positive predictive value, 88.5%-96.1% (81.5%-100%), or negative predictive value, 91.1%-96.3% (83.6%-100%) between previous studies and the cohort from Boothby-Shoemaker et al with this unified methodological approach. Rigorous standardization of calculation methods is necessary when the goal is direct cross-study comparability.

The Utilization of PRAME in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Melanoma

Melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer, has seen improved survival rates due to advances in diagnosis and treatment, yet the need for further improvement remains critical. Tumor-associated antigens, such as PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma), offer promising avenues for enhanced diagnostic precision, prognostic assessment, and targeted immunotherapy. PRAME, a cancer testis antigen, is selectively expressed in various cancers, including melanoma, and plays a key role in promoting tumorigenesis through inhibition of retinoic acid signaling, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and immune evasion. This review explores the diagnostic utility of PRAME in distinguishing melanoma from benign nevi, its prognostic value in aggressive melanoma subtypes, and its potential as a therapeutic target in cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies. While PRAME-targeted therapies face challenges such as tumor heterogeneity and immune suppression, ongoing research aims to overcome these barriers, offering hope for more effective melanoma treatments.

PRAME and Historical Immunohistochemical Antibodies Ki-67, P16, and HMB-45 in Ambiguous Melanocytic Tumors

ABSTRACT

Ambiguous melanocytic lesions/tumors (AMLs) can be simply described as melanocytic neoplasms that cannot be differentiated as either a melanoma or a nevus. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a novel antibody that can help differentiate between nevi and melanomas. However, its usefulness remains controversial in AMLs. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the importance of PRAME and diagnostic auxiliary antibodies (Ki-67, p16, HMB-45) in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, especially in AMLs. This study included 52 ambiguous melanocytic lesions, 40 nevi, and 40 melanomas. All immunohistochemical studies were performed automatically using the Universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red Detection Kit. Different analytic approaches were used for each antibody based on the literature. Statistically, the multinomial forward stepwise elimination logistic regression analysis was used to create a statistical model to predict the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions based on clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical data. PRAME positivity was very strong and diffuse in the melanoma group and statistically significantly higher than that of the AML and nevus groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the nevus and AML groups. The Ki-67 proliferation index and HMB-45 staining pattern provided valuable indications for distinguishing between these 3 groups. The P16 antibody was limited in supporting the differential diagnosis. Our statistical model showed that a high mitosis count, central pagetoid spread, and PRAME positivity increased the probability of melanoma against an AML diagnosis. This study showed the advantages of evaluating the PRAME antibody together with morphological features and other immunohistochemical markers (Ki-67 and HMB-45) in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

Evaluation of tubulin β-3 and 5 hydroxy-methyl cytosine as diagnostic and prognostic markers in malignant melanoma

Tubulin β-3 staining pattern and staining intensity of 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine (5-hmC) are potential diagnostic and prognostic markers in melanocytic lesions that need further evaluation. Melanocytic nevi and primary cutaneous melanomas were immunohistochemically stained for tubulin-β-3 and 5-hmC. Immunoreactivity and staining patterns were correlated with Breslow-thickness, clinical and pathological characteristics, and progression-free survival. Melanocytes showed positive tubulin β-3 staining. However, in most nevi, tubulin β-3 staining appeared as a gradient with intense cytoplasmic staining in cells of the superficial part of the lesion that faded to weak staining in the deep dermal part, while no gradient was found in deep penetrating nevi and melanomas. In 53 % of the melanomas, areas with loss of tubulin β-3 staining were found. 5-hmC staining intensity was significantly higher in melanocytic nevi compared to melanomas. Breslow thickness in combination with low 5-hmC score and loss of tubulin-β-3 staining was predictive for poor prognosis. As single markers, tubulin-β-3 and 5-hmC can be useful to distinguish between melanocytic nevi and melanoma, but staining variability limits the use of 5-hmC. In melanomas measuring >1.5 mm, combination of low 5-hmC score and loss of tubulin-β-3 staining may have prognostic value.

Digital quantification of PRAME for distinguishing melanoma from nevi compared to manual assessment

AIMS

In this proof-of-concept study, we propose a new method for automated digital quantification of PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen of MElanoma) as a diagnostic aid to distinguish between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. The proposed method utilizes immunohistochemical virtual double nuclear staining for PRAME and SOX10 to precisely identify the melanocytic cells of interest, which is combined with digital image analyse to quantify a PRAME-index.

METHODS

Our study included 10 compound nevi, 3 halo nevi, and 10 melanomas. Tissue slides were stained with PRAME, scanned, the cover glass removed, stained with SOX10, scanned again, and finally analysed digitally. The digitally quantified PRAME-index was compared with a manual qualitative assessment by a dermatopathologist using the standard PRAME-scoring system.

RESULTS

The digitally quantified PRAME-index showed a sensitivity of 70 % and a specificity of 100 % for separating melanomas from benign lesions. The manual qualitative PRAME-score showed a sensitivity of 60 % and a specificity of 100 %. Comparing the two methods using ROC-analyses, our digital quantitative method (AUC: 0.931, 95 % CI: 0.834;1.00, SD: 0.050) remains on par with the manual qualitative method (AUC: 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.725;1.00, SD: 0.078).

CONCLUSION

We found our novel digital quantitative method was at least as precise at classifying lesions as benign or malignant as the current manual qualitative assessment. Our method has the advantages of being operator-independent, objective, and replicable. Furthermore, our method can easily be implemented in an already digitalized pathology department. Given the small cohort size, more studies are to be done to validate our findings.

A Narrative Review of the Evolution of Diagnostic Techniques and Treatment Strategies for Acral Lentiginous Melanoma

Acral melanoma (AM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma located on the palms, soles, and nails. The pathogenesis of AM involves mechanical stimulation and characteristic tumor-promoting mutations, such as those in the KIT proto-oncogene. Dermoscopy is useful for diagnosing AM, which is characterized by parallel ridge patterns and irregular diffuse pigmentation. Although histopathological confirmation is the gold standard for diagnosing AM, lesions showing minimal histopathological changes should be considered early-stage AM if they clinically resemble it. Recently, immunohistochemical staining of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma has been recognized as a useful method to distinguish benign from malignant melanocytic tumors. Research reveals that AM is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by increased numbers of M2 macrophages and regulatory T cells, alongside a decreased number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Mohs micrographic surgery or digit-sparing wide local excision has been explored to improve quality of life and replace wide local excision or proximal amputation. AM has a worse prognosis than other subtypes, even in the early stages, indicating its inherent aggressiveness.

PRAME Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) immunohistochemistry has proven helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign melanocytic tumors. We studied PRAME IHC expression in 46 thin melanomas and 39 melanocytic nevi, mostly dysplastic nevi. Twenty-six percent (26.09%) of the melanomas showed diffuse PRAME staining in over 76% of the tumor cells (4+), and 34.78% of the melanomas showed PRAME expression in over 51% of the tumor cells (3+ or 4+), while 8% were entirely negative for PRAME. No melanocytic nevi were PRAME 4+ or 3+. More than half of the nevi (64%) were entirely negative for PRAME staining, and 36% of the nevi showed staining expression in 1-25% (1+) or 26-50% of the cells (2+). No nevi were stained with a color intensity of 3, while 16.67% of the melanomas were stained with this color intensity. Most nevi (78.57%) were stained with an intensity of 1. With a lower positivity threshold, sensitivity increases with still reasonable specificity. The best accuracy was obtained for the 2+ positivity threshold. In conclusion, PRAME staining helps distinguish thin melanomas from dysplastic nevi. However, the threshold of positivity should be lowered in order not to miss thin melanomas.

mRNA vaccines in tumor targeted therapy: mechanism, clinical application, and development trends

Malignant tumors remain a primary cause of human mortality. Among the various treatment modalities for neoplasms, tumor vaccines have consistently shown efficacy and promising potential. These vaccines offer advantages such as specificity, safety, and tolerability, with mRNA vaccines representing promising platforms. By introducing exogenous mRNAs encoding antigens into somatic cells and subsequently synthesizing antigens through gene expression systems, mRNA vaccines can effectively induce immune responses. Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their great contributions to mRNA vaccine research. Compared with traditional tumor vaccines, mRNA vaccines have several advantages, including rapid preparation, reduced contamination, nonintegrability, and high biodegradability. Tumor-targeted therapy is an innovative treatment modality that enables precise targeting of tumor cells, minimizes damage to normal tissues, is safe at high doses, and demonstrates great efficacy. Currently, targeted therapy has become an important treatment option for malignant tumors. The application of mRNA vaccines in tumor-targeted therapy is expanding, with numerous clinical trials underway. We systematically outline the targeted delivery mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the mechanism by which mRNA vaccines induce anti-tumor immune responses, describe the current research and clinical applications of mRNA vaccines in tumor-targeted therapy, and forecast the future development trends of mRNA vaccine application in tumor-targeted therapy.

PRAME expression in melanoma is negatively regulated by TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation

Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) dioxygenase-mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are emerging melanoma biomarkers. We observed an inverse correlation between PRAME expression and 5hmC levels in benign nevi, melanoma in situ, primary invasive melanoma, and metastatic melanomas via immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence: nevi exhibited high 5hmC and low PRAME, whereas melanomas showed the opposite pattern. Single-cell multiplex imaging of melanoma precursors revealed that diminished 5hmC coincides with PRAME upregulation in premalignant cells. Analysis of TCGA and GTEx databases confirmed a negative relationship between TET2 and PRAME mRNA expression in melanoma. Additionally, 5hmC levels were reduced at the PRAME 5' promoter in melanoma compared to nevi, suggesting a role for 5hmC in PRAME transcription. Restoring 5hmC levels via TET2 overexpression notably reduced PRAME expression in melanoma cell lines. These findings establish a function of TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation in regulating PRAME expression and demonstrate epigenetic reprogramming as pivotal in melanoma tumorigenesis.

Teaser

Melanoma biomarker PRAME expression is negatively regulated epigenetically by TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation.

SATB2 Cytoplasmic Expression is Characteristic of a Subset of Ovarian Stromal Cells and Sex Cord Stromal Tumors

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a nuclear transcription factor that shows consistent nuclear staining in colorectal adenocarcinoma and osteosarcoma. Following the observation of cytoplasmic staining with this marker in luteinized ovarian stromal cells, we studied the expression of SATB2 in ovarian stromal cells, various types of follicular cysts, and sex cord-stromal tumors. Eighty-five cases were stained for SATB2. Ovarian hilar Leydig cells (n = 12), luteinized stromal cells (n = 10), corpora lutea (n = 4), luteinized follicular cysts (n = 4), and stromal hyperthecosis (n = 6) exhibited consistent, usually diffuse, granular cytoplasmic staining. In addition, Leydig cell tumors (n = 1) and steroid cell tumors (n = 4) showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining. SATB2 also exhibited cytoplasmic staining in most Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (n = 16) and gynandroblastomas (n = 3) confined to the Leydig cell component. Adult granulosa cell tumors (n = 14), juvenile granulosa cell tumors (n = 3), sex cord tumors with annular tubules (n = 3), cellular fibromas (n = 3), sclerosing stromal tumors (n = 1), and thecomas (n = 1) were negative apart from cytoplasmic staining in associated luteinized stromal cells. SATB2 cytoplasmic staining has not been previously described in these lesions but is characteristic of a variety of ovarian stromal cells and sex cord-stromal tumors, in particular, those exhibiting luteinization or a Leydig or steroid cell component. SATB2 staining may be of value in identifying luteinized or Leydig cells when these are morphologically inconspicuous.

PRAME Immunohistochemistry for Distinguishing Vulvar and Vaginal Melanoma From Benign Melanocytic Nevi

Vulvovaginal melanoma (VVM) is a rare but deadly disease, accounting for 5% of all vulvar malignancies, with a 5-yr survival rate of only 47% for all stages of the disease. VVM is a distinct subset of melanoma, with a unique genomic profile and underlying pathogenesis unassociated with sun exposure. Distinguishing these rare malignancies from very common pigmented lesions of the vulva and vagina is challenging as histologic features often overlap between entities. PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) is a melanoma-associated protein, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PRAME distinguishes cutaneous, oral mucosal, and retinal melanoma from atypical nevi. Given the biological differences between VVM and cutaneous melanoma, the utility of PRAME IHC for the diagnosis of VVM is unknown. We accrued a cohort of 20 VVM and 21 benign vulvar melanocytic nevi. We found that nuclear PRAME IHC staining with 4+ intensity was present in 85% of the VVM and 0% of the nevi. With the assistance of PRAME IHC, we found evidence of close or positive margin involvement in 3 of 10 cases where margins were originally diagnosed as negative for melanoma in situ. Our study is the first to assess PRAME IHC in a cohort of VVM cases and provides confidence for using PRAME IHC to assist with diagnosis and margin assessment in this rare disease.

Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemistry is Superior to PRAME for the Differentiation of Sebaceous Carcinoma From Primary Cutaneous Basaloid Mimics

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous sebaceous neoplasia comprises a spectrum of disease ranging from benign adenomas to malignant carcinomas. The hallmark of these lesions is sebaceous differentiation. However, poorly-differentiated sebaceous carcinoma (SC), which lacks significant overt sebaceous differentiation, can show morphologic overlap with a variety of other basaloid cutaneous neoplasms. The accurate classification of SC is essential not only for diagnosis, but also because of the potential association with Muir-Torre syndrome. Androgen receptor (AR) is a sensitive, but not entirely specific immunohistochemical marker that has been used for the diagnosis of SC. PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) demonstrates strong cytoplasmic labeling of mature sebocytes and has been reported to be expressed in a variety of sebaceous neoplasms, including in the basaloid cell component. Therefore, we sought to compare the diagnostic use of cytoplasmic PRAME expression with that of AR for the distinction of SC from a cohort of basaloid cutaneous mimics; namely basal cell carcinoma, basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, pilomatricoma, cutaneous lymphadenoma, and extra-mammary Paget disease. We report that cytoplasmic PRAME expression is uncommon in poorly differentiated SC, and although specific, it shows very low sensitivity (22%). In contrast, AR was moderately sensitive (66%) and highly specific (92%) for the distinction of SC from basaloid mimics. These attributes, in addition to the nuclear expression of AR in the sebocytic and basaloid components of SC, suggest that AR is superior to PRAME for the diagnosis of SC.

Double Immunohistochemical Labelling of PRAME and Melan A in Slow Mohs Biopsy Margin Assessment of Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma

Introduction: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) predominantly affect the head and neck areas in elderly patients, presenting as challenging ill-defined pigmented lesions with indistinct borders. Surgical margin determination for complete removal remains intricate due to these characteristics. Morphological examination of surgical margins is the key form of determining successful treatment in LM/LMM and underpin the greater margin control provided through the Slow Mohs micrographic surgery (SMMS) approach. Recent assessments have explored the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers, such as Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME), to aid in LM/LMM and margin evaluation, leveraging the selectivity of PRAME labelling in malignant melanocytic neoplasms. Methods: A Novel double-labelling (DL) method incorporating both PRAME and MelanA IHC was employed to further maximise the clinical applicability of PRAME in the assessment of LM/LMM in SMMS biopsies. The evaluation involved 51 samples, comparing the results of the novel DL with respective single-labelling (SL) IHC slides. Results: The findings demonstrated a significant agreement of 96.1% between the DL method and SL slides across the tested samples. The benchmark PRAME SL exhibited a sensitivity of 91.3% in the SMMS specimens and 67.9% in histologically confirmed positive margins. Discussion: This study highlights the utility of PRAME IHC and by extension PRAME DL as an adjunctive tool in the assessment of melanocytic tumours within staged excision margins in SMMS samples.

A Comparison of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma Immunohistochemistry and Diagnostic Gene Expression-Profiling Assay in Challenging Melanocytic Proliferations

ABSTRACT

Most melanocytic tumors are classified as benign or malignant based on clinical morphology, histology, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. A subset of more challenging cases with ambiguous features may require further evaluation with established ancillary diagnostic molecular studies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or single nucleotide polymorphism array, to increase diagnostic certainty. More recently, a diagnostic gene expression-profiling (GEP) assay and an IHC stain for the detection of PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) have been developed. The use of PRAME IHC has been validated in cases of unequivocal and ambiguous melanocytic proliferations via comparing results with fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or single nucleotide polymorphism array. A study comparing performance metrics of PRAME IHC and diagnostic GEP has not been previously published. Herein, we evaluated the use of PRAME IHC in 55 melanocytic tumors with challenging histomorphology by comparing the results with diagnostic GEP and final histomorphologic diagnosis. Intertest agreement occurred in 88% of cases. PRAME IHC supported the final diagnosis in 89% of cases with a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 95%, and positive predictive value of 88.2%. GEP agreed with the final diagnosis in 88% of cases with a sensitivity of 65%, 97% specificity, and positively predicted melanoma in 91.7% of cases. Because the results of this study align with past publications evaluating the performance metrics of PRAME IHC, showing it to be as sensitive as and more cost effective than all other ancillary molecular tests, we propose the use of PRAME IHC as the optimal first-line diagnostic tool for ambiguous melanocytic proliferations.

Diagnostic utility of the 23-gene expression profile test for an atypical intradermal melanocytic proliferation

Ancillary tests such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression profile (GEP) testing may be needed to arrive at a definitive diagnosis for some atypical melanocytic neoplasms. A 34-year-old male with a family history of melanoma presented with a large, heterogeneous melanocytic lesion on the cheek. Histopathological review of two biopsies revealed an atypical intradermal melanocytic proliferation with spitzoid features without ulceration or regression. Scattered mitotic figures were identified. In addition to performing SOX10 IHC, PRAME and HMB45 staining highlighted weak, patchy positivity that was stronger in superficial, pleomorphic melanocytes (Ki-67, 5-7% mitotic rate). Based on these concerning but ambiguous IHC results and lingering concern for melanoma reiterated by other consulting dermatopathologists, the 23-GEP was requested for both specimens, which both returned a malignant result. The inconclusive histopathological features of malignancy were resolved by 23-GEP testing, facilitating a final diagnosis of malignant melanoma (pT3a, 2.5 mm Breslow depth, Clark's level IV).

Diagnostic utility of combining PRAME and HMB-45 stains in primary melanocytic tumors

BACKGROUND

Pathologists face ongoing challenges distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic tumors. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) has a demonstrated value distinguishing between these types of lesions. However, the sensitivity of single immunohistochemistry is variable. HMB-45 is another valuable marker, but on its own, has a limited ability in setting of primary melanocytic tumors. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a dual panel combining PRAME and HMB-45 in the assessment of primary melanocytic tumors.

METHODS

259 tumors, of which 141 were benign nevi, 31 dysplastic nevi (either low- or high grade dysplasia), and further 87 malignant melanomas, were retrieved from the department's archives and assessed by two experienced dermatopathologists. New sections were stained with PRAME and HMB-45, respectively. For PRAME, a nuclear, and for HMB-45, a cytoplasmic staining, was considered positive and scored as described in the literature on a scale from 0 to 4+. Only dermal component was assessed on HMB-45 stain.

RESULTS

PRAME was diffusely expressed in only 1 benign nevus, with focal expression in further 28 compared to 22 diffusely and 103 focally HMB-45-positive benign nevi. 5 high-grade dysplastic nevi showed diffuse PRAME expression in epidermal component, with varying degree of positivity in adjacent dermal compartment, and further 8 dysplastic nevi showed only focal expression. HMB-45 was diffusely expressed in only 2, with focal expression in 23, and no apparent positivity in remaining 6 dysplastic nevi. In invasive melanoma group, PRAME stained >75 % cells in 64/87 tumors, however, 10/87 melanomas were completely negative. HMB-45 was captured diffusely in 49/87 melanomas, 32 showed patchy expression, and 6 tumors were blank negative. Diffuse 4+ PRAME positivity showed superior sensitivity and specificity of 73,6 % and 96,5 %, respectively, compared to HMB-45, 56,3 % and 86,0 %, respectively. No nevi showed double 4+ positivity, however, the sensitivity for double positivity was only 49,4 %.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the superiority of PRAME over HMB-45 in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors. However, combined staining can significantly increase specificity, rendering a benign diagnosis more unlikely in a double 4+ diffuse positivity setting.

Cutaneous Melanoma: A Review of Multifactorial Pathogenesis, Immunohistochemistry, and Emerging Biomarkers for Early Detection and Management

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is an increasingly significant public health concern. Due to alarming mortality rates and escalating incidence, it is crucial to understand its etiology and identify emerging biomarkers for improved diagnosis and treatment strategies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the multifactorial etiology of CM, underscore the importance of early detection, discuss the molecular mechanisms behind melanoma development and progression, and shed light on the role of the potential biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment. The pathogenesis of CM involves a complex interplay of genetic predispositions and environmental exposures, ultraviolet radiation exposure being the predominant environmental risk factor. The emergence of new biomarkers, such as novel immunohistochemical markers, gene mutation analysis, microRNA, and exosome protein expressions, holds promise for improved early detection, and prognostic and personalized therapeutic strategies.

Immunohistochemistry for PRAME in Dermatopathology

ABSTRACT

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a tumor-associated antigen first identified in a melanoma patient and found to be expressed in most melanomas as well as in variable levels in other malignant neoplasms of epithelial, mesenchymal, or hematolymphoid lineage. Detection of PRAME expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue is possible by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with commercially available monoclonal antibodies. In situ and invasive melanoma frequently show a diffuse pattern of nuclear PRAME immunoreactivity which contrasts with the infrequent and typically nondiffuse staining seen in nevi. In many challenging melanocytic tumors, results of PRAME IHC and other ancillary tests correlate well, but not always: The tests are not interchangeable. Most metastatic melanomas are positive for PRAME, whereas nodal nevi are not. Numerous studies on PRAME IHC have become available in the past few years with results supporting the value of PRAME IHC as an ancillary tool in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions and providing insights into limitations in sensitivity and specificity as well as possible pitfalls that need to be kept in mind by practicing pathologists.

PRAME expression in 137 primary cutaneous melanomas and comparison with 38 related metastases

Melanocytic lesions have always represented a diagnostic challenge for surgical pathologists. According to the literature, PRAME showed great promise as an immunohistochemical tool in the distinction between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed 137 thicker (Breslow > 1 mm) primary cutaneous melanomas with the aim to better understand the utility of PRAME immunohistochemistry in daily practice and also to investigate if PRAME could represent a prognostic biomarker for cutaneous melanomas. PRAME immunohistochemistry was performed in all melanomas and in the metastases with antibodies to PRAME (dilution 1:1000, clone Ab219650) on an automated immunostainer (Ventana Benchmark Ultra) using a brown chromogen (DAB). We found that melanomas (59.1%) show diffuse PRAME expression (score 4 +). 99 (72.3%) primary cutaneous melanoma had no relapse during the follow-up. Of this group of melanomas, 61/99 (61.6%) were diffusely positive for PRAME. 38 (27.7%) primary cutaneous melanoma had relapses. Of this group, 28/36 (77.7%) were diffusely positive. We did not find any statistical correlation between diffuse PRAME expression and the presence of driver mutation in BRAF gene (p = 0.927), NRAS gene (p = 0.496) or either of the two (p = 0.138). We did not find a prognostic significance of diffuse PRAME expression for relapse (p = 0.462) or survival rate (p = 0.245). The prognostic value of PRAME has been only reported in mucosal, uveal and cutaneous thin melanomas. Here, we show statistical analyses on PRAME expression for melanoma with Breslow > 1 mm based on survival rate and long-term follow-up. According to our results, PRAME is a useful immunohistochemical ancillary tool in daily practice diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

Molecular and clinicopathological implications of PRAME expression in adult glioma

BACKGROUND

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a biomarker studied in various human cancers. Little is known about the biological implications of PRAME in glioma. We aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis to explore PRAME gene expression and its biological and clinicopathological significance in gliomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We accessed the human cancer atlas (TCGA) database to collect glioma patients (n = 668) with primary tumors and gene expression data. Single nucleotide variants, copy number variation, DNA methylation data, and other clinicopathological factors were also extracted for the analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 170, 484, and 14 tumors showed no expression, low expression (FPKM≤1), and overexpression (FPKM>1) of the PRAME gene, respectively. The principal component analysis and pathway analyses showed that PRAME-positive gliomas (n = 498), which consisted of tumors with PRAME low expression and overexpression, expressed different oncogenic profiles, possessing higher activity of Hedgehog, P3IK-AKT-mTOR, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways (p<0.001). DNA methylation analysis also illustrated that PRAME-positive tumors were distributed more densely within a grade 4-related cluster (p<0.001). PRAME positivity was an independent prognostic factor for poor outcomes in a multivariate cox analysis adjusted for clinical characteristics and genetic events. Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by revised classification showed that PRAME positivity was solely associated with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, grade 4. Finally, PRAME-overexpressing cases (n = 14) had the worst clinical outcome compared to the PRAME-negative and PRAME-low cohorts (adjusted p<0.001) in pairwise comparisons.

CONCLUSION

PRAME expression statuses may dictate different biological and clinicopathological profiles in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

Insights into Melanoma Clinical Practice: A Perspective for Future Research

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis is the key to improving outcomes for patients with melanoma, and this requires a standardized histological assessment approach. The objective of this survey was to understand the challenges faced by clinicians when assessing melanoma cases, and to provide a perspective for future studies.

METHODS

Between April 2022 and February 2023, national and international dermatologists, pathologists, general practitioners, and laboratory managers were invited to participate in a six-question online survey. The data from the survey were assessed using descriptive statistics and qualitative responses.

RESULTS

A total of 54 responses were received, with a 51.4% (n = 28) full completion rate. Of the respondents, 96.4% reported ambiguity in their monthly melanoma diagnosis, and 82.1% routinely requested immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing to confirm diagnosis. SOX10 was the most frequently requested marker, and most respondents preferred multiple markers over a single marker. Diagnostic and prognostic tests, as well as therapeutic options and patient management, were all identified as important areas for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

The respondents indicated that the use of multiple IHC markers is essential to facilitate diagnostic accuracy in melanoma assessment. Survey responses indicate there is an urgent need to develop new biomarkers for clinical decision making at multiple critical intervention points.

PRAME immunohistochemistry in soft tissue tumors and mimics: a study of 350 cases highlighting its imperfect specificity but potentially useful diagnostic applications

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is currently used in pathology for the assessment of melanocytic neoplasms; however, knowledge of its expression patterns in soft tissue tumors is limited. PRAME immunohistochemistry (clone QR005) was assessed on whole tissue sections of 350 soft-tissue tumors and mimics (> 50 histotypes). PRAME immunoreactivity was evaluated as follows: 0 "negative" (0% positive cells); 1+ (1-25% positive cells); 2+ (26-50% positive cells); 3+ (51-75% positive cells), and 4+ "diffuse" (> 75% positive cells). PRAME was expressed in 111 lesions (0 benign, 6 intermediate malignancy, and 105 malignant), including fibrosarcomatous dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (2/4, 0 diffuse), NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm (2/4, 0 diffuse), atypical fibroxanthoma (1/7, 0 diffuse), Kaposi sarcoma (1/5, 0 diffuse), myxoid liposarcoma (11/11, 9 diffuse), synovial sarcoma (11/11, 6 diffuse), intimal sarcoma (7/7, 5 diffuse), biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (3/3, 1 diffuse), angiosarcoma (10/15, 6 diffuse), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (9/12, 4 diffuse), pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (2/3, 2 diffuse), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (2/6, 0 diffuse), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (7/7, 4 diffuse), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2/12, 1 diffuse), leiomyosarcoma (2/15, 1 diffuse), clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue (1/10, 0 diffuse), low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (1/5, 0 diffuse), Ewing sarcoma (2/10, 1 diffuse), CIC-rearranged sarcoma (8/8, 4 diffuse), BCOR-sarcoma (2/5, 1 diffuse), melanoma (20/20, 14 diffuse), and thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (5/5, all diffuse). All tested cases of spindle cell lipoma, dedifferentiated/pleomorphic liposarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, solitary fibrous tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, nodular fasciitis, myxofibrosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, atypical vascular lesion, hemangioma, lymphangioma, vascular malformation, papillary endothelial hyperplasia, GIST, gastrointestinal clear-cell sarcoma, malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor, neurofibroma, schwannoma, granular cell tumor, alveolar soft part sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, myoepithelioma, ossifying fibromyxoid tumor, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, PEComa, dermatofibroma, pleomorphic dermal sarcoma, and chordoma were negative. PRAME shows imperfect specificity in soft-tissue pathology but may serve as a diagnostic adjunct in selected differential diagnoses that show contrasting expression patterns.

Immunohistochemical expression of PRAME is a marker of poor prognosis in uveal melanoma: A clinico-pathologic and immunohistochemical study on a series of 85 cases

PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testis antigen, first isolated in tumor-reactive T-cell clones from a metastatic melanoma patient. It has been widely studied in skin pathology as an immunohistochemical marker capable of distinguishing between benign nevi and malignant melanomas. PRAME has been found to be also expressed in non-melanocytic tumors, including lung, breast, kidney and ovarian cancer. However, less is known about the diagnostic and/or prognostic role of this protein in uveal melanoma (UM); few studies have reported that PRAME expression seems to give to UM patients an additional metastatic risk beyond the other already-known prognostic parameters. In the present retrospective study, we aimed to correlate PRAME immunoreactivity to other clinico-pathologic features and follow-up data on a large series of 85 cases (45 non-metastasizing and 40 metastasizing tumors) of primary UM. A statistically significant correlation was found between PRAME expression and higher metastatic risk and lower metastasis-free survival. We propose to include PRAME in the immunohistochemical panel of UM as an easily usable marker capable of predicting higher metastatic risk and stratifying patients' outcome.

PRAME Expression in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck Region

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma), a cancer-testis antigen expressed in normal and neoplastic tissues with several functions, proved to be a useful diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. The current study aims to perform PRAME stain on a retrospective case series of mucosal melanocytic tumors of the head and neck region to compare 3 different scores and evaluate the most reliable one in this diagnostic set. Immunohistochemical analysis for PRAME was performed in 54 benign and malignant mucosal melanocytic tumors of the head and neck region collected from 41 patients. The best-performing cutoff of PRAME-positive cells (nuclear stain) to differentiate benign and malignant mucosal melanocytic tumors of the head and neck region is that proposed by Raghavan and colleagues (<60%/≥60% of PRAME-positive cells), with 100% and 77.8% of benign lesions and malignant tumors respectively correctly identified. Applying this score, PRAME stain showed the best results (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values) for the diagnosis of head and neck melanocytic tumors. However, a subset of PRAME-negative malignant tumors was identified, especially located in the palatal area (hard and soft palate). Finally, high PRAME expression (≥60%) was associated with specific sites (nasal cavity/nasal septum/turbinates nasopharynx, and the maxillary sinus), nodular histotype, and female sex.

The Importance of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Tumor Depth of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

Primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) is the most aggressive skin malignancy, with an increasing incidence and significant mortality. Tumoral invasion, expressed as Breslow thickness, is routinely assessed on hematoxylin and eosin (HE), although this stain may sometimes underestimate the tumoral depth. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of the immunohistochemical (IHC) markers S-100, SOX10, Melan-A, and HMB-45 with HE for the evaluation of the Breslow thickness and staging of PCM. This retrospective study included 46 cases of PCM diagnosed between 2015 and 2022; for each case, the Breslow thickness using HE, S-100, SOX10, Melan-A, and HMB-45 was measured and the appropriate T category was recorded. The highest values of the Breslow thickness were observed for S-100. However, S-100, SOX10, and Melan-A provided statistically significant higher values of the Breslow thickness compared to HE, but no difference was noted between HMB-45 and HE. S-100 was most frequently involved in increasing the T category (26.1%), the majority of cases being upstaged from T1a to T1b. The IHC markers S-100, SOX10, and Melan-A contributed to better evaluation of the melanoma invasion, especially in thin melanomas, but their impact on staging and consecutive treatment remains to be confirmed by future studies.

PReferentially Expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME): preliminary communication on a translational tool able to early detect Oral Malignant Melanoma (OMM)

Oral malignant melanoma (OMM) has a prevalence less than 1% of all melanomas and it commonly develops on the oral mucosa following a slow and unspecific transformation of unstable melanocytic lesions, often resulting in a diagnostic delay. The marker PReferentially Expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) seems to be a valid tool to investigate the biological and histological nature of cutaneous melanocytic lesions, but to date its use to characterize pigmented lesions in the oral cavity is largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to create preliminary knowledge on the PRAME expression in OMM, and to compare its expression respect to other dysplastic pigmented lesions of the oral cavity. Interestingly, PRAME has been demonstrated to be reliable in the clinical conditions investigated in our pilot study; in fact, it has clearly differentiated the cases of Melanoma, which showed diffuse and intense positivity (score 6+/7+) to PRAME, from the other melanocytic nevi, which resulted to be mainly negative to PRAME. This means a better differential diagnosis, a reliable early diagnosis and a proper clinical/surgical management of the oncological lesions. In conclusion, PRAME can be a valid qualitative marker for differential diagnosis, not only in cutaneous melanomas, but also in malignant melanoma of the entire head and neck area.

PRAME immunohistochemistry can distinguish melanocytic pseudonests of lichenoid reactions from melanoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing melanocytic pseudonests encountered in lichenoid dermatoses or lichenoid keratoses from melanoma in situ (MIS) with brisk lichenoid inflammation can prove challenging.

METHODS

We designed a case-control study to evaluate the accuracy metrics of PRAME immunohistochemistry to distinguish melanocytic pseudonests in lichenoid dermatoses or keratoses from inflamed MIS. Immunostaining for PRAME was performed on paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed diagnostic tissue using a rabbit monoclonal antibody to PRAME (Abcam), with a 1:3200 dilution on a Leica Bond detection system.

RESULTS

Our search identified 21 cases of melanocytic pseudonests (n = 21, 46%) encountered in lichenoid dermatoses and 24 cases of inflamed MIS (n = 24, 53%). Each method of evaluating PRAME immunohistochemistry (PRAME+ clusters, PRAME % of melanocytes by four categories and PRAME+ melanocyte counts per linear mm of epidermal basal layer) showed statistically significant differences between the MIS and the pseudonest cohorts (respectively, p < 0.001; p < 0.001; and p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis for PRAME+ melanocyte counts per linear mm of epidermal basal layer revealed an area under the curve of 0.9 ± 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.9-1.0). When determining an optimal cut-off point for the best Youden index [sensitivity (%) + specificity (%) - 100], the cut-off of 1.0 PRAME+ melanocytes per linear mm showed a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 85.7% (Youden index 0.65) to distinguish MIS from pseudonests.

CONCLUSION

PRAME immunohistochemistry may constitute an additional tool for this challenging differential diagnosis.

Incipient Melanonychia: Benign Finding or Occult Malignancy? A Case Report of Subungual Melanoma

Subungual melanomas are rare neoplasms that tend to debut as longitudinal melanonychia. They are primarily found in patients over 60 years of age and are usually diagnosed late, representing a diagnostic challenge. We present a case report of a 59-year-old female Hispanic patient who initially presented with melanonychia and was eventually diagnosed with subungual melanoma in situ. She was surgically treated and, after three months, remained healthy. Relevant risk factors, clinical and onychoscopic findings, diagnostic criteria, and treatment options are also discussed. Since many benign entities present similarly, high clinical suspicion is critical for diagnosing this entity.

Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non-subungual acral melanocytic lesions

BACKGROUND

The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non-subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN).

METHODS

Twenty-two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti-PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%-25%, 1+; 26%-50%, 2+; 51%-75%, 3+; and >75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME-negative melanomas and PRAME-positive nevi.

PRAME Immunohistochemistry of Spitzoid Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms are well known to be diagnostically challenging. Immunohistochemistry and molecular approaches have been used as ancillary diagnostic tests. Herein we investigate the use of PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the assessment of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms.

METHODS

10 Spitz nevi, 14 atypical Spitz tumors, and 11 spitzoid melanomas were retrieved and PRAME IHC was scored on a scale of 1-4 (in % quartiles). Intensity of staining was categorized as weak or strong. Cases with no staining received a score of 0. Positive lymph nodes from three spitzoid melanomas were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors, and spitzoid melanomas had mean PRAME IHC scores of 1.20, 0.93, and 3.36 respectively. The percentage of cases with a score 3 or higher for each category of spitzoid neoplasms are as follows: Spitz nevus (20%), atypical Spitz tumor (0%), and spitzoid melanoma (82%). Among the spitzoid melanomas, 3 cases had positive sentinel lymph nodes which demonstrated PRAME score of 2, 4, and 4 in the metastatic deposits.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous reports revealed PRAME IHC as useful to distinguish benign from malignant melanocytic lesions. The results presented here are concordant with the prior studies, but expand the application of this marker to Spitz nevi/tumors and spitzoid melanomas. The present findings suggest the potential diagnostic utility of PRAME IHC in the assessment of spitzoid melanocytic lesions, particularly in distinguishing spitzoid melanomas from Spitz nevi and atypical Spitz tumors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and Human Malignant Melanoma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testis antigen (CTA) identified in 1997 through analysis of the specificity of tumor-reactive T-cell clones derived from a patient with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Although at first it seemed even more specific, various studies have shown that PRAME can also be expressed in the context of atypical lesions that do not correspond solely to the definition of malignant melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of English articles was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

126 records were identified in the literature search, of which 9 were duplicates. After screening for eligibility and inclusion criteria, 53 publications were included.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of a new marker such as PRAME is surely a step forward not only in the diagnostic approach, but also in the immunotherapeutic approach to MM. However, various studies have shown that PRAME can also be expressed in the context of atypical lesions apart from MM and, for this reason, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (hence accuracy) are clearly lower. Further studies with larger case series will be necessary to understand better what possibilities are offered in terms of diagnostic reliability by PRAME.

PRAME Immunocytochemistry for the Diagnosis of Melanoma Metastases in Cytological Samples

(1) Background: Fine-needle aspiration cytology is often used for the pre-operative diagnosis of melanoma metastases. The diagnosis may not be confidently established based on morphology alone, and immunocytochemistry is mandatory. The choice of the most advantageous immunocytochemical antibodies is critical, as the sample may be scant, and the presence of pigmented histiocytes may be confounding. However, the diagnostic performance of melanocytic markers in this setting is poorly investigated. Moreover, PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) recently emerged as a novel marker for the diagnosis of melanoma. The current work aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of PRAME for the diagnosis of melanoma metastases in cytological samples, compared to other melanocytic markers. (2) Methods: PRAME, S100, Melan-A, HMB45 and SOX10 were tested on cell block sections of 48 cases of melanoma metastases diagnosed from cytological samples, and 20 cases of reactive lymphadenopathy. (3) Results: S100 and SOX10 showed the highest sensitivity (100%), while the sensitivity of PRAME was 85.4%. PRAME, Melan-A, SOX10 and HMB45 showed a specificity of 100%, while the specificity of S100 was lower (85%), as it marked some histiocytes. (4) Conclusion: PRAME immunocytochemistry is highly specific for the diagnosis of melanoma metastasis from a cytological sample, but is less sensitive compared with other melanocytic markers.

PRAME Expression in Challenging Dermal Melanocytic Neoplasms and Soft Tissue Tumors With Melanocytic Differentiation

ABSTRACT

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is an immunohistochemical biomarker that is diffusely expressed in most cutaneous melanomas and is negative in most benign nevi. Histologically challenging dermal melanocytic neoplasms, such as cellular blue nevi (CBN) and deep penetrating nevi (DPN), and soft tissue tumors with melanocytic differentiation, such as clear cell sarcoma and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, may resemble primary or metastatic melanoma. PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) was applied to archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of various dermal melanocytic neoplasms and soft tissue neoplasms with melanocytic differentiation. Staining was graded based on the percentage of melanocytes labeled (0-4+ as previously reported). The gold standard was final pathologic diagnosis using histologic, immunophenotypic, and in some cases molecular findings. Fifty-four cases were evaluated. 62.5% (5/8) of blue nevus-like melanomas and 50% (1/2) of DPN-like melanomas were PRAME positive (4+). Of the other tumors, 100% (20/20) of CBN (including 1 atypical CBN with borderline features); 100% (12/12) of DPN, combined DPN, or borderline DPN; 88.9% (8/9) of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors; and 100% (3/3) of clear cell sarcoma were PRAME negative (0-2+). Within the borderline categories specifically, all 8 tumors (1 borderline CBN and 7 borderline DPN) showed low (0-2+) PRAME expression. Overall, the sensitivity for melanoma in this context was 60%, with a specificity of 97.7%. Although our sample size is limited, the results suggest that IHC staining for PRAME may be useful in supporting a diagnosis of melanoma in the setting of challenging dermal melanocytic neoplasms and other epithelioid neoplasms with melanocytic differentiation. However, PRAME IHC lacks sensitivity in this context.

Lack of PRAME Expression in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare tumors with no established markers that can reliably distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer/testis antigen that is found in many solid and hematologic malignancies. PRAME overexpression typically portends a poor prognosis and lower chemotherapeutic response. To date, no studies have established a role for PRAME in CTCL. An analysis was performed on 47 cases definitively diagnosed as CTCL: 25 cases of mycosis fungoides, 2 of Sezary syndrome, 5 of CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder, 7 of primary cutaneous anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma, 3 of primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, 1 of subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, and 4 of angiocentric T-cell lymphoma. PRAME immunohistochemistry was completely negative in all cases. PRAME expression was not found in any CTCL subtypes, suggesting that the pathogenesis of CTCL is not mediated by PRAME. Further study is required to identify biomarkers that might aid in the diagnosis and prognostication of CTCLs.