Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: A guide for the clinician

Prevalence of Lipoprotein(a) Measurement and its Association with Arteriosclerosis in Asymptomatic Individuals in China

AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and its level is genetically determined. Although guidelines and consensuses in various cardiovascular fields have emphasized the importance of Lp(a), screening for Lp(a) in China has not been well studied.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using a random sample of 30,000 medical examiners from each of the five health check-up centres. The distribution of Lp(a) was described for those who completed Lp(a) testing, and logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate the relationship between Lp(a) levels and vascular structure and function in the population who underwent carotid ultrasound and brachial‒ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) measurements.

RESULTS

Lp(a) was measured in only 4400 (3.02%) of the 150,000 participants. Among those tested for Lp(a), the median concentration was 15.85 mg/dL. The proportion of participants with Lp(a) levels ≥ 30 mg/dL was 15.00%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between Lp(a) and cIMT ≥ 1.0 mm (OR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.001-1.014, P=0.020) and carotid artery plaques (OR: 1.010, 95% CI: 1.004-1.016, P=0.001) but no correlation with baPWV ≥ 1400 (OR: 0.999, 95% CI: 0.993-1.005, P=0.788) or baPWV ≥ 1800 (OR: 1.002, 95% CI: 0.993-1.011, P=0.634).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection rate of Lp(a) at health checkups is low, and Lp(a) is positively associated with cervical vascular sclerosis and plaque but not with baPWV. Therefore, the testing rate of Lp(a) and the awareness of the risk of vascular structural changes due to Lp(a) should be further improved.

Waist to hip ratio modifies the cardiovascular risk of lipoprotein (a): Insights from MESA

AIMS

To assess if adiposity measures such as waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) modify the relationship of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

METHODS

4652 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) were grouped as follows: Lp(a) < 50 mg/dl and WHR <90th percentile(pct) (reference); Lp(a) < 50 mg/dl and WHR ≥90th pct; Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl and WHR <90th pct; and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl and WHR ≥90th pct. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the relationship of Lp(a) and WHR with time to ASCVD events.

RESULTS

Compared to the reference group, isolated elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl or WHR ≥90th pct were not significantly associated with risk of ASCVD (hazard ratio (HR), 1.15, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.94-1.39) and (HR, 1.14, 95 % CI: 0.92-1.41), respectively. In contrast, the combination of elevated Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl and WHR ≥90th pct was associated with ASCVD risk (HR, 2.34, 95 % CI: 1.61-3.40). Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl was not significantly associated with ASCVD risk in the 1st and 2nd tertile of WHR (HR, 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.72-1.48and HR, 1.08, 95 % CI: 0.79-1.48, respectively). However, Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dl was significantly associated with ASCVD risk in the highest tertile of WHR (HR, 1.60, 95 % CI: 1.23-2.09). (Interaction p = 0.01). Body mass index (BMI) and Lp(a) combinations resulted in similar greater risks of ASCVD in the highest risk category (HR, 1.33, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.77), without a significant interaction (p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

In MESA, WHR significantly modifies the risk of ASCVD associated with Lp(a). Measures of abdominal adiposity may further refine the cardiovascular risk in individuals with elevated Lp(a).

Highlights of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Studies Presented at the 2024 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Focused review highlighting ten select studies presented at the 2024 American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions.

RECENT FINDING

Included studies assessed effects of intensive blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes (BPROAD); decision support system for physicians to optimize early lipid lowering therapies after acute coronary syndrome (ZODIAC); efficacy and safety of zerlasiran, a short interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a) (ALPACAR); efficacy and safety of muvalaplin an oral disrupter of the assembly of lipoprotein(a) particles (KRAKEN); safety and efficacy of obicetrapib in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (BROOKLYN); efficacy and safety of lerodalcibep, a third generation PCSK9 inhibitor in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia subjects (LIBerate-HeFH_OLE); personalized app-based coaching to improve physical activity in patients with HFpEF compared to standard care (MyoMobile); semaglutide to improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery and overweight or obesity (the SELECT trial); efficacy and safety of plozasiran in adults with genetically or clinically defined familial chylomicronemia syndrome at high risk of acute pancreatitis (PALISADE); and transcriptomic signatures and predictors of evolocumab added to maximum statin therapy based on intra-coronary plaque characteristics (YELLOW III). Research presented at the 2024 AHA Scientific Sessions emphasized innovative strategies in cardiovascular disease prevention and management.

The nonlinear association between lipoprotein(a) and major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome patients with three-vessel disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a lipoprotein with potent atherogenic and thrombogenic potential. Its role in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) combined with three-vessel disease (TVD) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between Lp(a) levels and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS combined with TVD. Patients who underwent coronary angiography and were diagnosed with ACS combined with TVD were selected for the study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their Lp(a) levels. The correlation between Lp(a) and MACE was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and restricted cubic spline plot (RCS). A total of 1504 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 38 months. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients with higher Lp(a) levels had a significantly increased incidence of MACE (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high Lp(a) levels remained an independent predictor of MACE (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that higher Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with a higher risk of MACE in subgroups including patients aged ≥ 60 years, males, those with hypertension, CKD, without diabetes, without hyperlipidemia, and without stroke (P < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis further confirmed the close correlation between Lp(a) and MACE (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the cumulative incidence of MACE in the high Lp(a) group was significantly higher than in the low-level group (P < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis indicated that Lp(a) had some predictive value for the occurrence of MACE (AUC: 0.623, 95% CI: 0.593-0.653, P < 0.001). The RCS plot demonstrated that after transforming Lp(a) to a normal distribution as Log10Lp(a), there was an approximately U-shaped nonlinear association between Log10Lp(a) and the risk of MACE (P nonlinear < 0.001). Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with the risk of MACE in patients with ACS combined with TVD.

The prevalence, patients' characteristics, and hyper-Lp(a)-emia risk factors in the Polish population. The first results from the PMMHRI-Lp(a) Registry

BACKGROUND

The knowledge on the prevalence of elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), patients' characteristics, and nongenetic risk factors is scarce in some regions including Poland, the largest Central and Eastern European country. Thus, we aimed to present the results from the Lp(a) registry established in Poland's 2nd largest, supra-regional hospital - the Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI).

METHODS

The PMMHRI-Lp(a)-Registry was established in January 2022. Since that time all consecutive patients of the Departments of Cardiology, Endocrinology, and outpatient cardiology, diabetology and metabolic clinics have been included. The indications for Lp(a) measurement in the registry are based on the 2021 Polish Lipid Guidelines and new Polish recommendations on the management of elevated Lp(a) (2024). Lp(a) was determined using Sentinel's Lp(a) Ultra, an Immunoturbidimetric quantitative test (Sentinel, Milan, Italy), and the results are presented in mg/dL.

RESULTS

511 patients were included in the registry between Jan 2022 and 15th May 2024. The mean age of patients was 48.21 years. Female patients represented 53.42 % of the population. Elevated Lp(a) levels above 30 and 50 mg/dL were detected in 142 (27.79 %), and 101 (19.8 %) patients, respectively. The mean Lp(a) level was 30.45 ± 42.50 mg/dL, with no significant sex differences [mean for men: 28.80 mg/dL; women: 31.89 mg/dL]. There were also no significant differences between those with and without: coronary artery disease (CAD), dyslipidemia, stroke, heart failure, cancer, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and thyroid disease. The significant Lp(a) level difference was observed in those with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) vs those without (51.47 ± 55.16 vs 28.09 ± 37.51 mg/dL, p < 0.001). However, when we divided those with premature vs no premature MI, no significant difference in Lp(a) level was observed (51.43 ± 57.82 vs 51.52 ± 53.18 mg/dL, p = 0.95). Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) at baseline did not significantly affect Lp(a) level, with only significant differences for the highest doses of rosuvastatin (p < 0.05) and in those treated with ezetimibe (as a part of the combination therapy; 44.73 ± 54.94 vs 26.84 ± 37.11 mg/dL, p < 0.001). For selected patients (n = 43; 8.42 %) with at least two Lp(a) measurements (mean time distance: 7 ± 5 months, range 1-20 months) we did not observe statistically significant visit-to-visit variability (mean difference: 3.25 mg/dL; r = 0.079, p = 0.616). While dividing the whole population into those with Lp(a) ≤30 mg/dL and > 30 mg/dL, the only hyper-Lp(a)-emia prevalence differences were seen for FH diagnosis (12.88 vs 21.43; p = 0.017), MI prevalence (6.52 vs 16.90 %; p < 0.001), thyroid disease diagnosis (18.14 vs 26.76 %; p = 0.033) and ezetimibe treatment (18.58 vs 30.77 %, p = 0.036). A similar pattern was observed while dividing the whole population on those with Lp(a) ≤50 mg/dL (125 nmol/L) and > 50 mg/dL (125 nmol/L) except for no statistical difference for thyroid disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These results strongly emphasize that Lp(a) should be measured commonly, as its high level is highly prevalent (even every 3rd patient) in patients at cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in primary and secondary prevention, requiring risk re-stratification and optimization of the treatment. This is especially important in the regions that characterize baseline high CVD risk, which refers to most CEE countries, including Poland.

All we need to know about lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a genetically determined macromolecular complex, is independently and causally associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic stenosis via proposed proinflammatory, prothrombotic, and proatherogenic mechanisms. While Lp(a) measurement standardization issues are being resolved, several guidelines now support testing Lp(a) at least once in each adult's lifetime for ASCVD risk prediction which can foster implementation of more aggressive primary or secondary prevention therapies. Currently, there are several emerging targeted Lp(a) lowering therapies in active clinical investigation for safety and cardiovascular benefit among both primary and secondary prevention populations. First degree relatives of patients with high Lp(a) should be encouraged to undergo cascade screening. Primary prevention patients with high Lp(a) should consider obtaining a coronary calcium score for further risk estimation and to guide further ASCVD risk factor management including consideration of low dose aspirin therapy. Secondary prevention patients with high Lp(a) levels should consider adding PCSK9 inhibition to statin therapy.

Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Molecular-Weight Apo(a) Phenotype as Determinants of New Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Premature Coronary Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetic risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is related to vascular inflammation and detected in atherosclerotic plaques. A temporary increase in the circulating concentration of PCSK9 and Lp(a) was shown in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the apo(a) phenotype and the Lp(a) concentration as well as its complex with PCSK9 in the development of cardiac events and MI in patients with a premature manifestation of coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

In a prospective study with retrospective data collection, we included 116 patients with premature CHD who were followed for a median of 14 years. The medical history and information on cardiovascular events after an initial exam as well as data on the levels of lipids, Lp(a), PCSK9, PCSK9-Lp(a) complex, and apo(a) phenotype were obtained.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of a low- (LMW, n = 52) or high-molecular weight (HMW, n = 64) apo(a) phenotype. LMW apo(a) phenotype (odds ratio 2.3 (1.1 to 4.8), p = 0.03), but not elevated Lp(a) (1.9 (0.8-4.6), p = 0.13), was an independent predictor for the development of MI after adjustment for sex, age of CHD debut, initial lipids levels, and lipid-lowering treatment. The apo(a) phenotype also determined the relationship between Lp(a) and PCSK9 concentrations. The level of the PCSK9-Lp(a) complex was higher in LMW apo(a) patients.

CONCLUSION

The LMW apo(a) phenotype is a risk factor for non-fatal MI in a long-term prospective follow-up of patients with premature CHD, and this link could be mediated via PCSK9.