Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

Correlations between injury- and child-related factors and participation and quality of life after childhood traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine correlations between injury- and child-factors and participation and quality of life (QoL) after childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHOD

Cross-sectional data was analysed on 59 children with TBI included in a larger survey study. These children experienced their TBI at 12.2 years old and were 2.1 years post-injury, on average.

RESULTS

On average, children's executive functioning, family functioning, and psychosocial QoL were within typical limits based on parent-reported standardized measures, yet participation was within the limited/somewhat limited range and physical QoL below the average for the U.S.

POPULATION

Bivariate analyses revealed significant correlations between age at injury, executive functioning summary and subscale scores, and family functioning with participation and psychosocial QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the understanding of risk and protective factors and the interaction amongst these factors for children with TBI. These findings highlight the need for professionals to monitor and provide direct and indirect interventions, as needed, for all components of the ICF framework for children with TBI and their families.

Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for the identification of clinically important traumatic brain injury in children in France: a diagnostic accuracy substudy

BACKGROUND

Many children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15, undergo hospitalisation or cranial CT (CCT) scans despite the absence of clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI; ie, hospitalisation >2 days associated with intracranial lesions on CCT, neurosurgical intervention, intensive care admission, or death). Clinical algorithms have reduced CCT scans and hospitalisations by 10%. We aimed to established age-appropriate reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 and evaluate their diagnostic test performance in identifying ciTBI in children.

METHODS

This study was a diagnostic test accuracy substudy within the PROS100B stepped wedge cluster randomised trial that included children aged 16 years or younger, clinically managed within 3 h of mTBI, with a GCS score of 15 requiring hospitalisation or CCT scan according to French Pediatric Society guidelines (equivalent to the intermediate risk group of the PECARN algorithm). Enrolment for PROS100B occurred from Nov 1, 2016, to Oct 31, 2021, at 11 hospital emergency departments in France. Stored blood samples collected from March 1, 2015, to Oct 31, 2015, from children aged 16 years or younger who were outpatients for allergic conditions unrelated to mTBI and free of neurological disease were used as a control group to calculate reference values of GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups (<6 months, 6 months to <2 years, 2 years to <4 years, and 4 years to <16 years). The diagnostic test performance of GFAP and UCH-L1, both above the reference range to identify ciTBI, was evaluated in the children with mTBI. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured with the Alinity analyser (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA).

FINDINGS

Reference values were calculated from GFAP and UCH-L1 measured in samples from 718 control children (378 [53%] boys and 340 [47%] girls). 531 children (334 [63%] boys and 197 [37%] girls) aged 0-16 years with mTBI were included. By applying our reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups the biomarker combination (both biomarkers above reference ranges) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 69-100), a negative predictive value of 100% (99-100), a specificity of 67% (63-71), a positive likelihood ratio of 3·01 (2·67-3·40), a negative likelihood ratio of 0, and an area under the curve of 0·83 (0·81-0·85) in identifying ciTBI.

INTERPRETATION

Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 identify ciTBI in children with 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity, which could potentially reduce unnecessary CCT scans and hospitalisations in children with mTBI if implemented.

FUNDING

French Ministry of Health.

Evaluation of Quantitative Pupillometry in Acute Postinjury Pediatric Concussion

BACKGROUND

Although millions of children sustain concussions each year, a rapid and objective test for concussion has remained elusive. The aim of this study was to investigate quantitative pupillometry in pediatric patients in the acute, postinjury setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective case-control study of concussed patients presenting to the emergency department within 72 hours of injury. Pupillary measurements were gathered using NeurOptics' PLR 3000; evaluation included a symptom checklist and neurocognitive assessment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 126 participants were enrolled. One significant difference in pupillometry between concussed and control participants was found: left minimum pupil diameter in 12- to 18 year-olds (P = 0.02). Models demonstrating odds of a concussion revealed significant associations for time to 75% recovery (T75) of the left pupil in five- to 11-year-olds and average dilation velocity of the left pupil in 12- to 18-year-olds (P = 0.03 and 0.02 respectively). Models predicting symptom improvement showed one significant association: percent change of the right pupil in five-to-11-year-olds (P = 0.02). Models predicting neurocognitive improvement in 12- to 18-year-olds demonstrated significant association in T75 in the left pupil for visual memory, visual motor processing speed, and reaction time (P = 0.002, P = 0.04, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The limited statistically significant associations found in this study suggest that pupillometry may not be useful in pediatrics in the acute postinjury setting for either the diagnosis of concussion or to stratify risk for prolonged recovery.

Normative values and factors affecting Pediatric Reach Tests in Saudi children aged 6-11 years in the eastern province: cross-sectional study

Background

The Pediatric Reach Tests (PRTs) assess balance while standing-the Functional Reach Test (FRT) and Lateral Reach Test (LRT)-and in a sitting position-the Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT) and Modified Lateral Reach Test (MLRT). Normative values have not been fully evaluated in Saudi children. The objectives are; to estimate the normative values for PRTs; investigate the correlation between the PRTs and demographic/anthropometric characteristics; and develop predictive equations for the PRTs.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 251 children aged 6-11 were recruited. The PRTs were measured and correlated with demographic/anthropometric variables. A stepwise regression was conducted to develop the predictive equations for the PRT scores.

Results

The mean and standard deviations (in cm) of the PRT scores were as follows: FRT = 20.02 ± 4.31; LRT = 13.42 ± 3.38; MFRT = 21.49 ± 4.70, and MLRT = 14.64 ± 3.66. Several significant correlations were found. Moderate correlations existed between the PRT scores and age, height, upper extremity length, lower extremity length, and foot length; there was a weak correlation with body mass index. Weight was moderately correlated with FRT and MFRT and weakly correlated with LRT and MLRT. The correlation between the base of support and LRT was moderate and was weak with FRT, MFRT, and MLRT. A weak correlation was found between sex and LRT. Age and height were the most predictive of PRT scores.

Conclusion

This study provided PRT normative values that can be used as a clinical reference for evaluating balance in typically developing children.

Sports-Related Concussion Affects Cognitive Function in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rates of sports-related concussion (SRC) are high in adolescents. Ambiguity exists regarding the effect of SRC on cognitive function in adolescents.

PURPOSE

To rigorously examine adolescents' cognitive function after SRC.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed were searched from database inception until September 2021. Studies were included if participants were adolescents aged 13 to 18 years, if the definition of SRC was fully consistent with the Berlin Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport, if the study included a control group or in-group baseline test, and if the study reported cognitive outcomes (eg, visual memory, processing speed) that could be separately extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 47 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 31 were included in the meta-analysis, representing 8877 adolescents with SRC. Compared with individuals in the non-SRC group, individuals with SRC had worse performance in cognitive function and reported more symptoms not only in the acute phase but also in the prolonged phase (1-6 months after injury) (visual memory: d = -0.21, 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.05, P = .012; executive function: d = -0.56, 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.06, P = .028; and symptoms: d = 1.17, 95% CI, 0.13 to 2.22, P = .028). Lower scores in most of the outcomes of cognitive function were observed at <3 days and at 3 to 7 days, but higher scores for verbal memory (d = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.17; P = .008) and processing speed (d = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.24; P < .001) were observed at 7 to 14 days after SRC relative to baseline. The effects of SRC on cognitive function decreased over time (100% of the variance in reaction time, P < .001; 99.94% of the variance in verbal memory, P < .001; 99.88% of the variance in visual memory, P < .001; 39.84% of the variance in symptoms, P = .042) in control group studies. Study design, participant sex, measurement tools, and concussion history were found to be modulators of the relationship between cognitive function and SRC.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that adolescent cognitive function is impaired by SRC even 1 to 6 months after injury. Results of this study point to the need for tools to measure cognitive function with multiple parallel versions that have demographically diversiform norms in adolescents. Effective prevention of SRC, appropriate treatment, and adequate evaluation of cognitive function before return to play are needed in adolescent SRC management. Moreover, caution is warranted when using the baseline-to-postconcussion paradigm in return-to-play decisions.

Case report: Lingering post-concussive symptoms in a pediatric patient with presumed Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

BACKGROUND

Connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) can affect collagen and elastin content and structure, including weakening of tissues and vasculature, thus contributing to multiple systemic manifestations. Prior research has successfully focused on peripheral life-threatening manifestations resulting in increased life expectancy, yet clinical observations have warranted investigation of neurological vulnerability, where little is known. Compromised brain tissues and cerebrovasculature could leave these patients vulnerable to mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), with increased severity and duration of post-concussive symptoms and delayed recovery. Clinical reports in adults indicate that higher severity of symptoms after a mild TBI, such as a concussion, can unmask connective tissues disorders leading toward diagnosis. This clinical case report is an example of a pediatric patient with presumed Ehlers-Danlos syndrome who demonstrates increased vulnerability to mild TBI/concussion.

PATIENT

A pediatric female patient presents with unexplained lingering post-concussive symptoms, including trouble sleeping, nausea, frontal headaches, dizziness, visual changes, fatigue, and left-sided weakness more than 6 months post-mild concussion. Patient history of hypermobility, joint derangement, soft tissue mobility, and bruising suggests a potential diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, which may explain symptom severity and length of recovery.

DISCUSSION

This case is the first documented instance of increased vulnerability to TBI in a pediatric patient with presumed Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. It highlights the need for awareness and prevention of injury in this vulnerable patient population, suggests more targeted therapeutic intervention for recovery, and demonstrates the need for preclinical research evaluating the influence of genetic mutations associated with connective tissue disorders on the central nervous system.