Transitioning a home-based, motivational interviewing intervention among families to remote delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Key lessons learned

Telephone versus video consultations: A systematic review of consumer and provider preferences

IntroductionAs telehealth services are increasingly utilised and mature, it is important to continue to assess the preferences of both consumers and providers to ensure that these services are being used in the most acceptable and effective manner. This review aims to analyse both consumer and provider preferences for telephone and video consultations.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted in April 2023 to identify studies that investigated consumer or provider preferences for either telephone or video consultations. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively with the main reported findings from each article categorised in regard to modality preference (i.e. preference for either telephone or video; no preference between modality, equivalency, or mixed preference statements).ResultsA total of 78 articles were included in the analysis. Studies were published between 2003 and 2023, with the majority (86%) published after 2020. While most studies used quantitative survey methods (69.2%), five used qualitative (6.4%) and 19 used a mixed methods approach (24.4%). The majority of included studies (54% of consumer studies and 76% of provider studies) reported video as the preferred telehealth modality over telephone.DiscussionAlthough video is mostly preferred over telephone, a number of consumer studies reported equivalent preference for telephone and video consultations and highlighted the benefits of each modality for different purposes.

Goals, Barriers, and Facilitators of Caregivers Who Participated in an In-Home Intervention to Improve Food Parenting Practices and Child Diet Quality

OBJECTIVE

To explore the goals, barriers, and facilitators set by caregivers of preschool-aged children to improve food parenting practices and household food environments.

DESIGN

Secondary qualitative analysis of collaborative goal sheets completed during in-home and telephone visits as part of a home-based pilot intervention.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-three Hispanic/Latinx caregivers, predominantly of low income.

PHENOMENON OF INTEREST

Patterns in goal content and anticipated barriers and facilitators.

ANALYSIS

Thematic analysis of goal sheets with a mixed inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Almost half of the goals were to support a healthy environment (40.7%) by increasing the availability of healthy foods through food shopping and meal planning. Other goals were to increase structure (33.7%) by establishing food-related routines and decreasing distractions. Goals related to autonomy support (25.4%) included involving their children (eg, cooking together). Caregivers' perceived barriers encompass individual (eg, stress, lack of time), interpersonal (eg, other family members' eating behaviors), and environmental-level (eg, food availability) factors. Caregivers only identified facilitators at the individual and interpersonal levels (eg, motivation).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Understanding goals, barriers, and facilitators can be used to tailor key messages to improve food parenting practices and children's diets. Future interventions can target broader environmental barriers while increasing awareness of individual, interpersonal, and environmental-level facilitators.

'If I Don't Have My Support Worker in the Room…': A Multi-perspective Mixed Methods Study of Remote Daily Living Support for Neurodivergent Young Adults

PURPOSE

Information technology is increasingly being employed for providing support and interventions in disability and health service contexts. This study aimed to investigate service users' and support workers' perspectives on remote support in daily living for young adults with neurodevelopmental conditions.

METHODS

Using a convergent mixed methods approach, we integrated qualitative and quantitative findings from survey responses and focus groups. Young service users (aged 18 to 29) diagnosed with ADHD and/or autism (n = 35) and support workers (n = 64) from four municipalities in Sweden responded to a survey designed to tap into their lived experiences and views. The topic was explored further in focus groups with young service users (n = 7) and support workers (n = 3). Open-ended survey questions were analyzed using qualitative content analyses and complemented with information from the focus groups, while closed survey questions were summarized descriptively. Inferences were merged in a joint display.

RESULTS

While participants reported having access to digital devices, service routines for remote contact were not in place. Service users were more hesitant than support workers in endorsing remote support, expressing concerns that this approach would be inferior to in-person support (e.g., owing to miscommunications and insufficient social and emotional contact). Still, both groups expressed that remote contact may at times be a beneficial complement to in-person meetings, increasing accessibility and user choice.

CONCLUSION

Service providers planning to implement remote support elements should explore the demand, acceptability, and organizational readiness for this approach. Moving forward, user engagement will be crucial to meet individual preferences, values, and needs.

Effectiveness of remotely delivered motivational conversations on health outcomes in patients living with musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of remotely delivered motivational conversations on health outcomes in musculoskeletal populations.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (inception-March 2022) were searched and combined with grey literature. Randomised control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of remotely delivered motivational conversation-based interventions within musculoskeletal populations, using valid measures of pain, disability, quality of life (QoL), or self-efficacy were included. Overall quality was assessed using GRADE criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models with pooled effect sizes expressed as standardised mean differences ( ± 95%CIs).

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs were included. Meta-analyses revealed very-low to moderate quality evidence that remote interventions have a positive effect on pain and disability both immediately post intervention and at long-term follow-up compared to control, and have a positive effect on self-efficacy immediately post intervention. There was no effect on QoL immediately post intervention or at long-term follow up.

CONCLUSION

Remotely delivered motivation-based conversational interventions have a positive effect on pain, disability, and self-efficacy but not on QoL.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Motivational conversations, delivered remotely, may be effective in improving some health-related outcomes in MSK populations. However, higher quality evidence is needed to determine optimal intervention durations, and dosing frequencies using sufficient sample sizes and follow-up time frames.

Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non-affective psychosis

OBJECTIVES

Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. People experiencing psychosis are at increased risk of death by suicide. Talking therapies can alleviate suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts. Therapies need to also be acceptable to recipients. The aim of this study was to investigate the views on psychological therapy for people experiencing psychosis and suicidality using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a randomised controlled trial comparing suicide prevention psychological therapy with treatment as usual. Individuals had a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis and experience of suicidal thoughts, plans and/or attempts. To assess the acceptability of the therapy, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants randomised to receive therapy. Data were deductively analysed using an adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

RESULTS

Interviews (Mean = 45 min) were conducted and audio recorded with 21 participants. Data were organised into six themes: 1. Affective attitude, 2. Burden, 3. Alliance, 4. Intervention coherence, 5. Perceived effectiveness, and 6. Self-efficacy. There was no evidence of issues relating to domains of ethicality and opportunity costs associated with receiving therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Talking about suicide was difficult and, at times, distressing, but it was perceived to be useful for understanding experiences. To be acceptable, it is important for therapists to ensure that clients' understanding of therapy aligns with expectations of effectiveness and to invest in building strong therapeutic alliances. Future research will benefit from examining therapists' experiences of delivering therapy through different modes (e.g. online, telephone).

Remote motivational interviewing to improve patient self-care and caregiver contribution to self-care in heart failure (REMOTIVATE-HF): Rationale, design, and methodology for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

In patients with heart failure (HF), self-care, and caregiver contribution to self-care (i.e., the daily management of the disease by patients and caregivers) are essential for improving patient outcomes. However, patients and caregivers are often inadequate in their self-care and contribution to self-care, respectively, and struggle to perform related tasks. Face-to-face motivational interviewing (MI) effectively improves self-care and caregiver contribution to self-care, but the evidence on remote MI is scarce and inconclusive. The aims of this randomized controlled trial will be to evaluate whether remote MI performed via video call in patients with HF: (1) is effective at improving self-care maintenance in patients (primary outcome); (2) is effective for the following secondary outcomes: (a) for patients: self-care management, self-care monitoring, and self-efficacy; HF symptoms; generic and disease-specific quality of life; anxiety and depression; use of healthcare services; and mortality; and (b) for caregivers: contribution to self-care, self-efficacy, and preparedness. We will conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial. We will enroll and randomize 432 dyads (patients and their informal caregivers) in Arm 1, in which patients and caregivers will receive MI or, in Arm 2, standard care. MI will be delivered seven times over 12 months. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 3 (primary outcome), 6, 9, and 12 months from enrollment. This trial will demonstrate whether an inexpensive and easily deliverable intervention can improve important HF outcomes. With the restrictions on in-person healthcare professional interventions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to evaluate whether MI is also effective remotely.

The role of e-health on the public knowledge and behavior in preventing COVID-19

Background

Electronic health (e-health) technologies play an important role in improving public knowledge and behavior to control the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study aimed to investigate the role of e-health on the public knowledge and behavior in preventing COVID-19 in Kerman, a city in Iran.

Methods

The present descriptive cross-sectional study used an online survey in Kerman in November 2021. The research instrument was a tripartite questionnaire that included demographic information, the level of respondents' knowledge about COVID-19, the extent of change in respondents' behavior influenced by e-health. Negative binomial regression analysis was run to test the relationship between individual characteristics and the research variables with knowledge and behavior. Spearman correlation test was used to measure the correlation between the two main parts of the survey.

Results

As the negative binomial regression analysis results showed, the relationship between no demographic variable and the public knowledge and behavior was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean knowledge and behavior scores were 5.84 ± 2.55 and 11.95 ± 5.09, respectively, showing that people who used e-health had a high level of knowledge, and taking preventive measures was at a high level. The Spearman correlation coefficient test results showed a positive association between knowledge and behavior (r = 0.71).

Conclusion

E-health played a decisive role in increasing knowledge and improving behavior in preventing COVID-19. The results of our research can encourage the use of e-health to improve the public knowledge and behavior in pandemics such as COVID-19.

Technology-Delivered Motivational Interviewing to Improve Health Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Conditions. A Systematic Review of the Literature

AIM

Provide an overview of remote Motivational Interviewing (MI) interventions for chronically-ill patients, and understand their degree of effectiveness on different health outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria included studies that administered remote MI alone or in combination with other remote approaches. A narrative synthesis and two meta-analyses were performed. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. MI administration almost exclusively occurred by telephone and individual sessions. Eight studies reported treatment fidelity aspects, and four declared adopting a theoretical framework. Most targeted outcomes were therapeutic adherence, physical activity, depression, quality of life, and mortality. Risk of bias varied markedly, with the largest source resulting from selection process and intervention performance. The two meta-analyses indicated a significant effect of MI on depression (Standardized Mean Difference = -0.20, 95%CI: -0.34, -0.05, Z = 2.73, p = 0.006, I2 = 0%), and no effect of MI on glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean Difference = -0.02, 95%CI: -0.48, 0.45), p = 0.94, I2 = 84%).

CONCLUSION

Remote MI can be a promising approach for improving depression in chronic disease patients. However, studies are inconclusive due to risks of bias, heterogeneity, and lack of reporting of interventionist's training, treatment fidelity, and theoretical frameworks' use. More studies with solid designs are needed to inform clinical decision-making and research.

Transition from an In-Person to Virtual Randomized Controlled Trial for Weight and Fitness Concerns in Active-Duty Service Members: Lessons Learned (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

This paper describes and discusses the transition of and modifications to a weight management randomized controlled trial among active-duty military personnel from an in-person to a virtual format as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The original pragmatic cohort-randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of an 8-week group weight management program, ShipShape, to a version of ShipShape enhanced with acceptance and commitment therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess potential differences between in-person and virtual participation in participants' demographics, motivation, confidence, credibility, expectations, and satisfaction with the interventions; we also examined the pragmatics of the technology and participants' experiences in virtual-format intervention groups.

METHODS

A total of 178 active-duty personnel who had failed or were at risk of failing their physical fitness assessment or were overweight or obese were enrolled in the study. In-person (n=149) and virtual (n=29) participants reported demographics, motivation, confidence, credibility, expectations, and satisfaction. Interventionists recorded attendance and participation in the group sessions. Independent-sample 2-tailed t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare the characteristics of the in-person and virtual participants. Pragmatics of the technology and participants' experiences in the virtual format were assessed through surveys and open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Participants were 29.7 (SD 6.9) years old on average, 61.8% (110/178) female, and 59.6% (106/178) White and had an average BMI of 33.1 (SD 3.9) kg/m². Participants were highly motivated to participate and confident in their ability to complete a weight management program. A total of 82.6% (147/178) of all participants attended 5 of the 8 sessions, and participation was rated as "excellent" by interventionists in both formats. The interventions were found to be credible and to have adequate expectations for effectiveness and high satisfaction in both formats. There were no differences between in-person and virtual participants in any of these metrics, other than interventionist-rated participation, for which virtual participants had significantly higher ratings (P<.001). Technical satisfaction with the virtual sessions was rated as "good" to "very good," and participants were satisfied with the content of the virtual sessions. A word cloud of responses identified "mindfulness," "helpful," "different," "food," "binder," and "class" as concepts the virtual participants found most useful about the program.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications made in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were successful, given the recruitment of active-duty personnel with similar demographic characteristics, attendance levels, and indicators of credibility, expectancy, and satisfaction in the virtual format and the in-person format. This successful transition provides support for the use of virtual or digital weight management interventions to increase accessibility and reach among highly mobile active-duty personnel.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03029507; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03029507.