Early Clinical Outcomes of Intra-Articular Injections of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for the Treatment of Early Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee: A Cohort Study

Part II: Biologic Augmentation Strategies as Useful Adjuncts in Musculoskeletal Surgery

Osseous healing after injury, whether by arthritis, osteonecrosis, or fracture, follows a fairly predictable and stepwise order of events. New bone formation requires osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and osteogenetic signals and environments for rapid and complete healing. Biologic augmentation strategies, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMACs) and other forms of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have been studied with renewed interest as a way to enhance healing in patients who have osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, delayed unions, and nonunions. Many studies have demonstrated positive results in favor of biologic augmentation strategies to treat or temporize arthritis, osteonecrosis, and nonunion. Future research is required to definitively determine the utility of these biologic augmentation strategies, and larger randomized controlled trials with longer-term follow-up are needed.

Narrative review and call to action on reporting and representation in orthobiologics research for knee osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis affects a significant portion of U.S. adults, and knee osteoarthritis contributes to 80% of disease burden. Previous data have shown that non-White patient populations often report worse symptoms and less favorable outcomes following arthroplasty, a definitive treatment for knee osteoarthritis. There is a lack of demographics data on race/ethnicity, as well as socioeconomic status (SES) and social determinants of health (SDOH), in knee osteoarthritis treatment guidelines and knee arthroplasty research. In addition, there is underrepresentation of non-White patient populations in the existing treatment guidelines for knee osteoarthritis. Over the past decade, orthobiologics have emerged as an alternative to surgical intervention. Our hypothesis is that there would be a similar lack of reporting of demographics data and underrepresentation of non-White populations in studies pertaining to orthobiologics, including evaluating differences in outcomes. This study reviewed U.S.-based research in orthobiologics as a treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. We identified a lack of demographics reporting in terms of race/ethnicity, and none of the studies reported SES or SDOH. Non-White populations were underrepresented; White patients contributed to 80% or more of all study populations that reported race/ethnicity. None studied the correlation between symptoms and outcome measures, and the race/ethnicity, SES, and SDOH of the patients. Based on a review of existing literature, we strongly advocate for ongoing research encompassing patients of all races/ethnicities, SES, and SDOH, and an exploration into potential variations in symptoms and outcomes among distinct population subgroups. Furthermore, SES barriers may influence health care delivery on orthobiologics for disadvantaged populations.

Management of hip osteoarthritis: harnessing the potential of mesenchymal stem cells-a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating condition, necessitating effective and safe treatment options. This systematic review aims to explore the potential of intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) infiltrations as a therapeutic approach for hip OA.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, encompassing PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria involved studies focusing on intra-articular MSC injections in patients with hip OA and reporting pain relief as an outcome measure. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and methodological index for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the review, exhibiting varied designs and sample sizes (316 patients). Outcome measures consisted of cartilage repair assessed through MRI and radiographies, pain scores (WOMAC, VAS, NRS), and functional improvements (HOS-ADL, OHS, FRI, PDQQ, LEFS). The studies reported favorable improvements in functional scores, pain relief, and cartilage repair/radiographic findings, with minimal reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular MSC infiltrations demonstrate promise as an effective and safe therapeutic intervention for managing hip OA, offering pain relief and functional enhancements. Nevertheless, limited high-quality studies and outcome measure variations underscore the need for further research to establish definitive treatment guidelines. Future investigations should address optimal MSC utilization, long-term outcomes, and potential complications to ensure the success of MSC-based therapies for hip OA management, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The findings provide valuable insights into the potential of MSC-based treatments for hip OA, advocating further rigorous research in this field.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023436973).

Safety and Efficacy of Bone-Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence

Introduction

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of disability and morbidity worldwide. It is estimated to affect 9.2% individuals globally with age over 45 years. Conventional treatment modalities have limitations and side-effects. To overcome these limitations, over the last decade, there has been an increased interest in the use of orthobiologics derived from autologous sources including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone-marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and adipose tissue derived formulations. This review qualitatively presents the in-vitro, pre-clinical, clinical and on-going clinical studies exploring the safety and efficacy of BMAC for management of hip OA.

Materials and methods

The electronic database search was done through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and Google Scholar till February 2024. The search terms used were "osteoarthritis" OR "hip osteoarthritis" OR "orthobiologics" OR "efficacy or use of orthobiologic treatment" OR "bone-marrow concentrate" OR "bone-marrow aspirate concentrate", AND "BMAC". The inclusion criteria were clinical studies of any level of evidence written in the English language, published till February 2024, evaluating the safety and efficacy of intra-articular administration of BMAC for the management of hip OA.

Results

A total of 5 studies were included in this review for qualitative data synthesis. The total number of patients who participated in the study was 182, ranging from 4 to 112 in a single study. No adverse events were reported throughout the duration of the study. In addition, intra-articular administration of BMAC led to reduced pain, and improved function and overall quality of life (QoL).

Conclusion

The results from this review demonstrated that administration of BMAC is safe and potentially efficacious in terms of reducing pain, improving function and overall QoL of patients with hip OA in short- and mid-term average follow-up based on the included studies. Nonetheless, more adequately powered, multi-center, prospective, double-blind, non-randomized and randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are warranted to establish long-term safety and efficacy of BMAC for management of hip OA and justify its routine clinical use.

The Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review

Background

Hip osteoarthritis (HOA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease with various treatment approaches. Biological agents, such as bone-marrow derived stem cells (BM-MSC) therapy, have recently been proposed as a treatment option in the management of HOA.

Purpose

We sought to further analyze the use of BM-MSC therapy by investigating the following questions. What is the standard preparation and practice? Does a dose response exist between stem cell therapy and clinical outcome? Does BM-MSC therapy alone produce effective clinical outcomes?

Methods

We conducted a scoping review using the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for scoping reviews. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science Core Collection was performed in June 2023 of studies using exclusively BM-MSC injections for the treatment of HOA. Study characteristic, injection preparation and dosage, clinical outcome measures, and adverse effect data were extracted and interpreted by 3 reviewers.

Results

Seven studies with a total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria. Clinical outcome following intra-articular injection of BM-MSCs was measured using the numerical pain scale, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the visual analogue scale, and other scores, all of which showed reduction in pain and increase in functional ability across studies.

Conclusions

This scoping review found that the efficacy of BM-MSC therapy alone in the treatment of HOA appeared beneficial, improving clinical outcomes in each study. All 7 studies used "low-dose" injections with variable follow-up times; thus, a clear dose-response relationship cannot be drawn. Future studies using high doses and analyzing long-term effects of BM-MSC injections in HOA are needed.

Current evidence on mesenchymal stem cells for hip osteoarthritis: a narrative review

There are limited data on the use of mesenchymal stem cell injections for hip osteoarthritis. The goal of this study was to evaluate the literature by analyzing outcomes and comparing methodologies. Online search of PubMed, SportsDiscus and Case Reports Keywords was completed using the keywords 'stem cells' and 'hip' and 'osteoarthritis'. Six studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five out the six studies had statistically significant improvement in patient reported outcomes after mesenchymal stem cell injections. Only two studies provided information on radiological changes and findings were positive. None of the studies reported major complications. Small series of non-randomized controlled trials completed to date in the use of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis reported the procedures to be safe and provide a positive clinical response. Randomized controlled trials must be performed to further confirm mesenchymal stem cells as a treatment option for hip osteoarthritis.

Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Who Receive Platelet-Rich Plasma or Bone-Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injections Have Better Outcomes Than Patients Who Receive Hyaluronic Acid: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature in order to compare the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify Level I studies that compared the clinical efficacy of at least 2 of the following 3 injection therapies: PRP, BMAC, and HA for knee OA. The search phrase used was knee AND osteoarthritis AND randomized AND ("platelet rich plasma" OR "bone marrow aspirate" OR "hyaluronic acid"). Patients were primarily assessed based on patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies (all Level I) met inclusion criteria, including 1,042 patients undergoing intra-articular injection(s) with PRP (mean age 57.7 years, mean follow-up 13.5 months), 226 patients with BMAC (mean age 57.0 years, mean follow-up 17.5 months), and 1,128 patients with HA (mean age 59.0 years, mean follow-up 14.4 months). Non-network meta-analyses demonstrated significantly better post-injection WOMAC (p < 0.001), VAS (p < 0.01), and Subjective IKDC scores (p < 0.001) in PRP patients when compared to HA patients. Similarly, network meta-analyses demonstrated significantly better post-injection WOMAC (p < 0.001), VAS (p = 0.03), and Subjective IKDC (p < 0.001) scores in BMAC patients when compared to HA patients. There were no significant differences in post-injection outcome scores when comparing PRP to BMAC.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing treatment for knee OA with PRP or BMAC can be expected to experience improved clinical outcomes when compared to HA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, Meta-Analysis of Level I studies.

Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Use of "orthobiologics" continues to expand for patients who have knee osteoarthritis (OA). We sought to perform a systemic review of biologic therapies relative to comparative groups, including the following: (1) platelet-rich plasma (PRP); (2) bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); (3) adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs); and (4) amniotic-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs). We assessed the following: (1) study methodologies; (2) cell preparations and formulations; (3) patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs); and (4) structural changes.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were queried (2013-2021) to conduct a systematic review of biologic therapies for knee OA, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eighty-two studies were included: PRP (51); BMSC (15); ADSC (11); and AMSC (5). Study evaluations were made using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. PROMs included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and the Visual Analog Scale. Structural change evaluations included ultrasounds, radiographs, or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

PRP comprised a majority of the studies (n = 51), most with "fair" to "good" Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Studies had variable cell preparations and formulations, with comparison study results leading to inconsistent PROMs, and structural changes. A limited number of studies were included for BMSC, ADSC, and AMSC, all with similar findings to PRP.

CONCLUSION

Available literature evaluating "orthobiologics" for knee OA remain nonsuperior to comparison cohorts. Higher level studies with larger sample sizes and improved methodologies are warranted to suggest differences. Despite a growth of "orthobiologics" in clinics, this updated systematic review highlights the uncertain efficacy for use in knee OA.

Orthobiologic Injections for the Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

The use of orthobiologics is gaining increasing interest as a minimally invasive treatment for hip osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to investigate the evidence about the safety and efficacy of these products. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The study quality was assessed using the RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) for all studies. A total of 20 clinical studies (735 patients) was identified, 12 on PRP injections and eight on cell-based therapies (five from bone marrow, two from adipose tissue, and one from amniotic fluid). The publication trend increased over time, with over 50% of articles published from 2019. The literature analysis showed only six RCTs, all on PRP injections. The mCMS showed an overall fair methodology (mean score 59.4). While the number of studies and their methodology are still limited, the available evidence suggests safety and overall promising results, with the treatment success being inversely proportional to the severity of OA. Further high-level controlled trials are needed before drawing more definitive conclusions on the real potential of orthobiologics for the injective treatment of patients affected by hip OA.

The Mechanism of Action between Pulsed Radiofrequency and Orthobiologics: Is There a Synergistic Effect?

Radiofrequency energy is a common treatment modality for chronic pain. While there are different forms of radiofrequency-based therapeutics, the common concept is the generation of an electromagnetic field in the applied area, that can result in neuromodulation (pulsed radiofrequency—PRF) or ablation. Our specific focus relates to PRF due to the possibility of modulation that is in accordance with the mechanisms of action of orthobiologics. The proposed mechanism of action of PRF pertaining to pain relief relies on a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines, an increase in cytosolic calcium concentration, a general effect on the immune system, and a reduction in the formation of free radical molecules. The primary known properties of orthobiologics constitute the release of growth factors, a stimulus for endogenous repair, analgesia, and improvement of the function of the injured area. In this review, we described the mechanism of action of both treatments and pertinent scientific references to the use of the combination of PRF and orthobiologics. Our hypothesis is a synergic effect with the combination of both techniques which could benefit patients and improve the life quality.

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has emerged as a therapeutic option for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of isolated BMAC injection in the treatment of OA of the knee joint.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2020 to identify human studies that assessed the clinical outcomes of isolated BMAC injection for the treatment of knee OA. The electronic search strategy used was "bone marrow aspirate concentrate knee osteoarthritis."

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 299 knees with a mean follow-up of 12.9 months (range, 6-30 months). Of all patient-reported outcomes assessed across studies, 34 of 36 (94.4%) demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to latest follow-up (P < .05). Five studies evaluating numerical pain scores (visual analog scale and Numeric Rating Scale) reported significant improvements in pain level at final follow-up (P < .01). However, 3 comparative studies evaluating BMAC in relation to other therapeutic injections failed to demonstrate the clinical superiority of BMAC.

CONCLUSION

The BMAC injection is effective in improving pain and patient-reported outcomes in patients with knee OA at short- to midterm follow-up. Nevertheless, BMAC has not demonstrated clinical superiority in relation to other biologic therapies commonly used in the treatment of OA, including platelet-rich plasma and microfragmented adipose tissue, or in relation to placebo. The high cost of the BMAC injection in comparison with other biologic and nonoperative treatment modalities may limit its utility despite demonstrable clinical benefit.

Umbilical Cord-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Background:

The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) has gained recent interest in the orthopaedics community.

Purpose:

To review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of umbilical cord–derived MSCs in the treatment of OA of the knee joint.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to identify studies with evidence levels from 1 to 4 that evaluated the clinical efficacy of human umbilical cord–derived MSC (hUC-MSC) injections for knee OA. The search phrase used was “umbilical cord knee osteoarthritis.” In the studies reviewed, patients were assessed based on the macroscopic International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.

Results:

A total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria, including 385 patients undergoing injection of hUC-MSCs (mean age, 59.7 years). The mean follow-up was 23.4 months. Weighted averages of the WOMAC, macroscopic ICRS, subjective IKDC, and VAS scores all showed improvement from before to after treatment. No severe adverse reactions were recorded.

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing treatment of knee OA with hUC-MSCs might be expected to experience improvements in clinical outcomes. Additional high-quality randomized studies are needed to better determine the efficacy of hUC-MSC for the treatment of knee OA.

Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy.

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Is Equivalent to Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis at 2 Years: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) are being used clinically as therapeutic agents for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of BMC and PRP on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis up to 24 months after injection. It was hypothesized that patients receiving BMC would have better sustained outcomes than those receiving PRP.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 90 participants aged between 18 and 80 years with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) were randomized into 2 study groups: PRP and BMC. Both groups completed the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire before and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after a single intra-articular injection of leukocyte-rich PRP or BMC. A linear mixed-effects model was performed to quantify the effects over time and the difference between the groups. This model has the random effect for time to assess the extent in which the change over time differs from one person to another.

RESULTS

An overall 84 patients completed questionnaires from baseline to 12 months; however, 17 patients (n = 9; PRP group) were lost to follow-up at 18 months and 25 (n = 13; PRP group) at 24 months. There were no statistically significant differences in IKDC (P = .909; 95% CI, -6.26 to 7.03) or WOMAC (P = .789; 95% CI, -6.26 to 4.77) scores over time between the groups. Both groups had significantly improved IKDC (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.275-0.596) and WOMAC (P = .001; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.13) scores from baseline to 24 months after the injection. These improvements plateaued at 3 months and were sustained for 24 months after the injection, with no difference between PRP and BMC at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of osteoarthritis, PRP and BMC performed similarly out to 24 months. BMC was not superior to PRP.

REGISTRATION

NCT03289416 (ClincalTrials.gov identifier).

Nonoperative and Operative Bone and Cartilage Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Hip: An Orthoregeneration Network (ON) Foundation Hip Review

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopaedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and, optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electromagnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the hip, including osteonecrosis (aseptic necrosis) involving bone marrow, bone, and cartilage, and chondral injuries involving articular cartilage, synovium, and bone marrow. Promising and established treatment modalities for osteonecrosis include nonweightbearing; pharmacological treatments including low molecular-weight heparin, prostacyclin, statins, bisphosphonates, and denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand inhibitor; extracorporeal shock wave therapy; pulsed electromagnetic fields; core decompression surgery; cellular therapies including bone marrow aspirate comprising mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs aka mesenchymal stem cells) and bone marrow autologous concentrate, with or without expanded or cultured cells, and possible addition of bone morphogenetic protein-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor; and arterial perfusion of MSCs that may be combined with addition of carriers or scaffolds including autologous MSCs cultured with beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics associated with a free vascularized fibula. Promising and established treatment modalities for chondral lesions include autologous platelet-rich plasma; hyaluronic acid; MSCs (in expanded or nonexpanded form) derived from bone marrow or other sources such as fat, placenta, umbilical cord blood, synovial membrane, and cartilage; microfracture or microfracture augmented with membrane containing MSCs, collagen, HA, or synthetic polymer; mosaicplasty; 1-stage autologous cartilage translation (ACT) or 2-stage ACT using 3-dimensional spheroids; and autologous cartilage grafting; chondral flap repair, or flap fixation with fibrin glue. Hip pain is catastrophic in young patients, and promising therapies offer an alternative to premature arthroplasty. This may address both physical and psychological components of pain; the goal is to avoid or postpone an artificial joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Impact of the Process Variables on the Yield of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Human bone marrow (BM) has been highlighted as a promising source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) containing various growth factors and cytokines that can be potentially utilized in regenerative procedures involving cartilage and bone. However, the proportion of MSCs in the nucleated cell population of BM is only around 0.001% to 0.01% thereby making the harvesting and processing technique crucial for obtaining optimal results upon its use in various regenerative processes. Although several studies in the literature have given encouraging results on the utility of BM aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in various regenerative procedures, there is a lack of consensus concerning the harvesting variables such as choice of anesthetic agent to be used, site of harvest, size of the syringe to be used, anticoagulant of choice, and processing variables such as centrifugation time, and speed. In this review article, we aim to discuss the variables in the harvesting and processing technique of BMAC and their impact on the yield of MSCs in the final concentrate obtained from them.

Biological Augments for Acetabular Chondral Defects in Hip Arthroscopy-A Scoping Review of the Current Clinical Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A wide array of joint-preserving surgical techniques exists in the management of acetabular chondral defects (ACDs). The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical outcomes of the recent biologics used to treat ACDs during hip arthroscopy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence is available for different biological solutions used in the hip. Studies have shown promising outcomes with minimal complications when using biologics as augmentation to microfracture (MF), including different scaffolds or stem cells, or to enhance autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). However, data so far is scarce, and more trials and longer follow-ups are needed to better delineate the appropriate indications and benefits for each technique. Presently, the level of evidence is low, but in general, biologics appear safe and trend toward beneficial compared to standard surgical techniques. Augmented MF is recommended for small to medium ACDs, and matrix-assisted ACI or three-dimensional ACI is recommended for medium to large defects.

Knee Intraosseous Injections: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence of Different Treatment Alternatives

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the available clinical evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of knee intraosseous injections for the treatment of bone marrow lesions in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases in January 2020. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: (1) studies of any level of evidence, dealing with subchondral injection of bone substitute materials and/or biologic agents; (2) studies with minimum 5 patients treated; and (3) studies with at least 6 months' follow-up evaluation. All relevant data concerning clinical outcomes, adverse events, and rate of conversion to arthroplasty were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were identified: 7 dealt with calcium phosphate administration, 3 with platelet-rich plasma, and 2 with bone marrow concentrate injection. Only 2 studies were randomized controlled trials, whereas 6 studies were prospective and the remaining 4 were retrospective. Studies included a total of 459 patients treated with intraosseous injections. Overall, only a few patients experienced adverse events and clinical improvement was documented in the majority of trial. The lack of any comparative evaluation versus subchondral drilling alone is the main limitation of the available evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee intraosseous injections are a minimally invasive and safe procedure to address subchondral bone damage in osteoarthritic patients. They are able to provide beneficial effects at short-term evaluation. More high-quality evidence is needed to confirm their potential and to identify the best product to adopt in clinical practice.

Intra-articular injection of autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the thumb first carpometacarpal joint: A pilot study

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the thumb first carpometacarpal joint. Injections were carried out in 27 thumbs. According to the Dell classification, there were 2 stage I, 11 stage II, 13 stage III and 1 stage IV cases. The bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crest, concentrated by centrifugation, and injected under fluoroscopic control into the pathological thumb. Results were assessed at a mean 16 months' follow-up (range, 8-26). Clinical evaluation comprised QuickDASH and PRWE scores, pain at rest on a numerical analog scale (NAS), and thumb column abduction on goniometry. QuickDASH and PRWE scores were 59 (range, 27-82) and 88 range, 37-125) preoperatively and 29 (range, 0-64) and 50 (range, 1-99) postoperatively, respectively. Mean pain at rest on NAS improved from 7 (range, 1-10) to 4 (range, 0-9). Thumb abduction improved by a mean 18° over preoperative data. No postoperative complications were found. Two patients had to be operated on for inefficacy of injection. This is the first article presenting the effect of an intra-articular injection of BMAC in the thumb first carpometacarpal joint and the results were encouraging. Many patients showed improved quality of life and pain relief. These injections appear to be an effective means of postponing surgery.

The use of biologics to improve patient-reported outcomes in hip preservation

Despite lack of clear understanding, the use of biologic treatment methods has increased in the United States. Therapeutic methods, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and hyaluronic acid (HA) among other biologics, are commonly associated with relief of pain in a number of different orthopedic conditions. Within the past two decades, hip preservationists have investigated the roles of these biologic treatments in both non-operative and surgical management of common hip conditions. The purpose is to review the published literature surrounding the application and efficacy of biologics, most notably PRP, BMAC and HA, in the clinical management of hip conditions. The hip conditions examined in this review include hip osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and associated labral tear pathology, avascular necrosis of the femoral head and gluteal/hamstring tendinopathy. While our review of the literature suggests that there is support for the implementation of biologics to relieve pain and improve function for hip conditions. Through further research efforts, it is important to stay updated with the clinical efficacy of biologics in hip preservation.

Safety and Efficacy of an Amniotic Suspension Allograft Injection Over 12 Months in a Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial for Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) and saline at up to 12 months of follow-up through the use of patient-reported outcomes, immunoglobulin levels, and anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) levels.

METHODS

Within this multicenter study, 200 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a single intra-articular injection of saline, HA, or ASA. Patient-reported outcomes, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analog scale (VAS) score, were collected at multiple time points (baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months) out to 12 months to assess improvements in pain and function. Radiographs at baseline and 12 months were taken to determine radiographic changes, while blood was collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months to determine changes in immunoglobulins and anti-HLA levels. Statistical analyses were performed using last observation carried forward and mixed effects model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Treatment with ASA resulted in significant improvements in KOOS and VAS scores that were maintained through 12 months (P < .05). Treatment with ASA resulted in a 63.2% responder rate at 12 months using the Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International simplified definition. There were no significant differences between groups for radiographic measures in the index knee, immunoglobulins, C-reactive protein, or anti-HLA serum levels (P > .05). The number and type of adverse events (AEs) reported for ASA were comparable to the HA injection group, while no treatment-emergent AEs were reported for the saline group.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial of ASA vs HA and saline for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis demonstrated clinically meaningful improved outcomes with ASA over the controls out to 12 months postinjection. No concerning immunologic or adverse reactions to the ASA injection were identified with regards to severe AEs, immunoglobulin, or anti-HLA levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled multicenter trial.

The safety and effectiveness of bone marrow concentrate injection for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a Canadian cohort

Aim: Describe the safety and effectiveness of intra-articular bone marrow concentrate (BMC) injection to treat knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (OA) in a Canadian cohort. Materials & methods: A total of 112 patients with refractory OA received a single intra-articular injection of BMC into their knee(s) and/or hip(s). Pain, disability and quality of life were prospectively assessed prior to and 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection. Results: Outcome scores were significantly improved at all time points post-BMC injection with maximal improvement observed at 3-6 months. Improvements were unrelated to patient age, sex or radiographic OA severity. The complication rate was <2%. Interpretation: In this Canadian cohort, knee/hip OA treated with a single BMC injection resulted in significant improvements in pain, disability and quality of life and a low complication rate.

An Update on Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Centered Therapies in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) is a degenerative disease characterized by cartilage degeneration, disrupted subchondral bone remodeling, and synovitis, seriously affecting the quality of life of patients with chronic pain and functional disabilities. Current treatments for TMJOA are mainly symptomatic therapies without reliable long-term efficacy, due to the limited self-renewal capability of the condyle and the poorly elucidated pathogenesis of TMJOA. Recently, there has been increased interest in cellular therapies for osteoarthritis and TMJ regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), self-renewing and multipotent progenitor cells, play a promising role in TMJOA treatment. Derived from a variety of tissues, MSCs exert therapeutic effects through diverse mechanisms, including chondrogenic differentiation; fibrocartilage regeneration; and trophic, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects. Here, we provide an overview of the therapeutic roles of various tissue-specific MSCs in osteoarthritic TMJ or TMJ regenerative tissue engineering, with an additional focus on joint-resident stem cells and other cellular therapies, such as exosomes and adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF). Additionally, we summarized the updated pathogenesis of TMJOA to provide a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms of cellular therapies. Although limitations exist, MSC-centered therapies still provide novel, innovative approaches for TMJOA treatment.

Mesenchymal stromal cell products for intra-articular knee injections for conservative management of osteoarthritis

Sports injuries and secondary joint problems, mainly of the knee, are common, especially in sports associated with high impact activities and/or torsional loading. The consequences can be career ending in elite athletes and reduce exercise activities in recreational people. Various cell products can be injected intra-articularly. First, fresh cellular mixtures can be prepared and injected in the same day, such as stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue (SVF) and bone marrow concentrates (BMCs). Second, autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can be isolated from BMCs or SVF and, after several weeks of laboratory expansion, several millions of MSCs can be obtained for intra-articular injection. Finally, allogeneic MSCs from the bone marrow, adipose tissue or perinatal tissues of selected donors constitute an ‘off-the-shelf’ experimental treatment for injection delivery in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The perceived efficacy of all these products is based on the hypothesis of a paracrine mechanism of action: when living cells are delivered within the joint, they establish a molecular cross-talk with immune cells and local cell phenotypes, thereby modulating inflammation with subsequent modifications in the catabolic/degenerative milieu. Current clinical research examines whether injection delivery of MSCs translates into actual clinical benefits. Overall, clinical studies lack the quality needed to answer major research questions, including clinical and structural efficacy, optimal cell dose, and number of injections and specific protocol for cell delivery. Poor experimental designs are exacerbated by the diversity of patient phenotypes that hinder comparisons between treatments. Further understanding of disease pathology is paramount to develop potent function assays and understand whether the host tissue, the cell product or both should be primed before MSCs are injected intra-articularly.

Bone marrow concentrate injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: evidence from preclinical findings to the clinical application

PURPOSE

To investigate the available literature on the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and summarize the current evidence supporting its potential for the injective treatment of joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) in April 2020, using the following string: "((bone marrow concentrate) OR (BMC) OR (bone marrow aspirate concentrate) OR (BMAC)) AND (osteoarthritis)", and inclusion criteria: clinical and preclinical (animal) studies of any level of evidence, written in English language, and evaluating the intra-articular or subchondral use of BMAC for the injective treatment of OA joints.

RESULTS

The publication trend remarkably increased over time. A total of 22 studies were included in the qualitative data synthesis: four preclinical studies and 18 clinical studies, for a total number of 4626 patients. Safety was documented by all studies, with a low number of adverse events. An overall improvement in pain and function was documented in most of the studies, but the clinical studies present significant heterogeneity, few patients, short-term follow-up, and overall poor methodology.

CONCLUSION

There is a growing interest in the field of BMAC injections for the treatment of OA, with promising results in preclinical and clinical studies in terms of safety and effectiveness. Nevertheless, the current knowledge is still preliminary. Preclinical research is still needed to optimize BMAC use, as well as high-level large controlled trials to better understand the real potential of BMAC injections for the treatment of patients affected by OA.

Current hip cartilage regeneration/repair modalities: a scoping review of biologics and surgery

PURPOSE

The rapidly growing and emerging nature of biologics have made indications for regenerative and reparative hip therapies ever changing, with at times only early-stage evidence for their use. The purpose of this study was to review and summarize the currently available data on the management of hip cartilage injuries and osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A scoping review of the available scientific literature for hip biologics was performed, with available evidence for hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet rich plasma (PRP), stem/stromal cells, microfracture, mosaicplasty, osteochondral allograft, and cell-based therapies investigated.

RESULTS

To date, there exist better guidelines and further consensus concerning knee joint biologic treatments than the hip due to a greater number of studies as well as the more recent emergence of hip preservation approaches. However, increasing evidence is available for the selective implementation of biologics on an individualized basis with attention to lesion size and location.

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic surgeons are at an exciting crossroads in medicine, where hip biologic therapies are evolving and increasingly available. Timetested interventions such as arthroplasty have shown good results and still have a major role to play but newer, regenerative approaches have the potential to effectively delay or reduce the requirement for such invasive procedures.

Bone Marrow Concentrate Injection Treatment Improves Short-term Outcomes in Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis Patients: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of disability in the United States, the hip being the second most affected weightbearing joint. Autologous bone marrow concentrate (BMC) is a promising alternative therapy to conventional treatments, with the potential to mitigate inflammation and improve joint function.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of a single intra-articular BMC injection for patients with symptomatic hip OA.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients diagnosed with symptomatic hip OA who elected to undergo a single BMC injection were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were excluded if they reported a preinjection Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pain with activity of <6 points out of 10. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and NRS pain scores were collected before and after the procedure (6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months). Joint space and Tönnis OA grade scores were recorded on preinjection anteroposterior pelvis radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 18 hips from 16 patients (7 male and 9 female) (mean age, 57.6 ± 11; mean body mass index, 25.9 ± 3.6 kg/m2) were used in the final analysis. Significant improvements were observed in NRS pain with activity (from 8 to 4.5; P < .001) and without activity (from 5 to 1; P < .001), WOMAC (from 31 to 16; P = .006), mHHS (from 63 to 80; P = .004), and HOS-ADL (from 71 to 85; P = .014) over 6 months. At 6 months, all patients maintained their improvements and did not return to preprocedure status. BMI significantly correlated with baseline WOMAC scores (P = .012) and inversely correlated with 6-month SF-12 Physical Component Summary (P = .038). Tönnis grades 2 and 3 were inversely correlated with 6-week SF-12 Mental Component Summary (P = .008) and 3-month pain with activity (P = .032). No serious adverse events were reported from the BMC harvest or injection procedure.

CONCLUSION

A single BMC injection can significantly improve subjective pain and function scores up to 6 months in patients with symptomatic hip OA. Further studies are warranted to evaluate BMC treatment against other therapeutics in a larger sample size and compare the biological signature profiles that may be responsible for the therapeutic effect.

Biological strategies for osteoarthritis: from early diagnosis to treatment

PURPOSE

To provide an updated review of the literature on the use of orthobiologics as a potential treatment option to alleviate symptoms associated with osteoarthritis (OA), slow the progression of the disease, and aid in cartilage regeneration.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify basic science and clinical studies examining the role of orthobiologics in the diagnosis and management of osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

Certain molecules (such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), microRNAs, growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF-11)) have been recognized as biomarkers that are implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of degenerative joint disease (DJD). These biomarkers have been used to develop newer diagnostic applications and targeted biologic therapies for DJD. Local injection therapy with biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma or stem cell-based preparations has been associated with significant improvement in joint pain and function in patients with OA and has increased in popularity during the last decade. The combination of PRP with kartogenin or TGF-b3 may also enhance its biologic effect. The mesenchymal stem cell secretome has been recognized as a potential target for the development of OA therapies due to its role in mediating the chondroprotective effects of these cells. Recent experiments have also suggested the modification of gut microbiome as a newer method to prevent OA or alter the progression of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of orthobiologics for the diagnosis and treatment of DJD is a rapidly evolving field that will continue to expand. The identification of OA-specific and joint-specific biomarker molecules for early diagnosis of OA would be extremely useful for the development of preventive and therapeutic protocols. Local injection therapies with HA, PRP, BMAC, and other stem cell-based preparations are currently being used to improve pain and function in patients with early OA or those with progressed disease who are not surgical candidates. Although the clinical outcomes of these therapies seem to be promising in clinical studies, future research will determine the true role of orthobiologic applications in the field of DJS.

Positive early clinical outcomes of bone marrow aspirate concentrate for osteoarthritis using a novel fenestrated trocar

BACKGROUND

This study sought to assess early clinical outcomes for knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) treatment using a novel closed-end, fenestrated trocar (FT) that does not require centrifugation.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 17 knee OA patients undergoing BMAC treatment with the FT system from March 2018 to March 2019 was retrospectively evaluated. Approximately 10 mL of BMAC was harvested, no centrifugation was performed, and the BMAC was injected into the affected knee. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline, six weeks, and 12 weeks. This study has no affiliation with/vested-interest in the FT system.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in nearly all outcomes from baseline to 12 weeks. Specific improvements included Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score (KOOS) activities-of-daily-living (61.1 ± 9.2 [mean ± 95% confidence interval] to 89.3 ± 6, p = 0.001), quality-of-life (32.7 ± 9.3 to 66.1 ± 17.9, p = 0.003), sports/recreation (36.9 ± 10.6 to 72.6 ± 26.3, p = 0.006), and pain (53.8 ± 9.3 to 83 ± 10.2, p = 0.001); Lysholm scores (55.5 ± 8.4 to 77.3 ± 10.5, p = 0.009); and visual analog pain scores (5.68 ± 1.14 to 2.07 ± 1.86, p = 0.003). Individually, at least 75% of patients exhibited improvement in all KOOS categories at six weeks and at least 85% at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

BMAC treatment with an FT system that does not require centrifugation resulted in significant improvements in early pain and function scores for knee OA. The symptomatic improvements in this study were similar to or greater than what has been reported using traditional needles. These data may provide clinicians with comfort in using an FT system and provide motivation for future randomized-controlled trials comparing aspiration techniques.

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Osteoarthritic Hip Pain: a Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent cause of chronic hip pain, affecting 27% of adults aged over 45 years and 42% of adults aged over 75 years. Though OA has traditionally been described as a disorder of "wear-and-tear," recent studies have expanded on this understanding to include a possible inflammatory etiology as well, damage to articular cartilage produces debris in the joint that is phagocytosed by synovial cells which leads to inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with OA of the hip frequently have decreased quality of life due to pain and limited mobility though additional comorbidities of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, poor sleep quality, and obesity have been correlated. Initial treatment with conservative medical management can provide effective symptomatic relief. Physical therapy and exercise are important components of a multimodal approach to osteoarthritic hip pain. Patients with persistent pain may benefit from minimally invasive therapeutic approaches prior to consideration of undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this review is to provide an update of current minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of pain stemming from hip osteoarthritis; these include intra-articular injection of medication, regenerative therapies, and radiofrequency ablation.

Orthobiologics for the Hip Region: A Narrative Review

Management of hip region disorders is challenging. Orthobiologic treatments including platelet rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cells, and amniotic injectables have gained popularity as promising treatments despite a lack of robust evidence for their effectiveness. We review rationale and current evidence for orthobiologics for three common hip region conditions: hip osteoarthritis, gluteal tendinopathy, and proximal hamstring tendinopathy. Overall, the current state of evidence is extremely limited for orthobiologic treatments and is predominantly relevant to PRP injections. There is currently a lack of data to support the use of mesenchymal stem cells or amniotic injectables in these conditions of the hip.

Minimally Manipulated Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence

Background

The use of laboratory-expanded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is subject to several restrictions, resulting in “minimal manipulation” methods becoming the current most popular strategy to increase the use of MSCs in an orthopaedic practice. The aim of the present systematic review is to assess the clinical applications of “minimally” manipulated MSCs, either as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) or as stromal vascular fraction (SVF), in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A systematic review of three databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) was performed using the following keywords: “Knee Osteoarthritis” with “(Bone marrow aspirate) OR (bone marrow concentrate)” or with “(adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells) OR (adipose derived stromal cells) OR (stromal vascular fraction) OR (SVF)” as either keywords or MeSH terms. The reference lists of all retrieved articles were further reviewed for identification of potentially relevant studies.

Results

Twenty-three papers were included in the final analysis (10 on BMAC and 13 on SVF). Of these, only 4 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Bias risk evaluation, performed using a modified Coleman score, revealed an overall poor quality of the studies. In terms of clinical application, despite the apparent safety of minimally manipulated MSCs and the short-term positive clinical outcomes associated with their use, clinicians reported different preparation and administration methods, ranging from single intra-articular injections to intraosseous applications to administration in combination with other surgical procedures.

Conclusions

The available literature is undermined by both the lack of high-quality studies and the varied clinical settings and different protocols reported in the few RCTs presently published. This prevents any recommendation on the use of either product in a clinical practice. Nevertheless, the use of minimally manipulated MSCs (in the form of BMAC or SVF) has been shown to be safe and have some short-term beneficial effects.

A specific protocol of autologous bone marrow concentrate and platelet products versus exercise therapy for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial with 2 year follow-up

Background

Cell-based therapies have shown promise for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The current study compared exercise therapy to autologous bone marrow concentrate (BMC) and platelet products for knee OA treatment.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic knee OA (N = 48) were randomized into either an exercise therapy control group or treatment group with injection of autologous BMC and platelet products. Patients in the control group could crossover to BMC treatment after 3 months. Clinical outcomes were documented at baseline and at 6-weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, including the Knee Society Score (KSS), Pain Visual Analogue Scale, Short Form-12 Scales (SF-12), and Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS).

Results

All patients in the exercise group crossed over to receive BMC treatment after 3 months (N = 22 crossover). At 3 months, KSS-knee, SF-12 Physical, and LEAS improved significantly in the crossover group compared to exercise, similar to significant improvements on KSS-knee and LEAS for the treatment group (N = 26) compared to exercise group at 3 months. After BMC treatment, patients’ clinical outcome scores (except SF-12 Mental Health), were significantly improved through the 2-year follow-up compared to baseline. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

The use of image-guided percutaneous BMC with platelet products yielded better results than exercise therapy as an effective alternative therapy for patients with symptomatic moderate to moderate-severe osteoarthritis of the knee.

Trial registration NCT02034032. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02034032. Registered 13 January 2014