Cytotoxic potential of denture base and reline acrylic resins after immersion in disinfectant solutions

Effects of disinfectants on physical properties of denture base resins: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The disinfection of removable dental prostheses and orthodontic appliances is essential to preventing transmission of pathogens. However, whether different disinfection solutions and durations affect the physical properties of denture base resins is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to statistically analyze the influence of disinfectants on the physical properties of denture base resins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search in Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to evaluate the effects of chemical disinfection on the physical properties of denture base resins such as surface morphology, roughness, hardness, and flexural strength. Of 1909 studies, 44 studies were included in the systematic review and 41 in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was analyzed by using I2 statistics. The influence of different disinfection solutions and durations on the physical properties was further analyzed, and the risk of bias evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.4 software program with the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 44 included studies, 40 studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias, and 4 had an unclear risk of bias. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control, disinfection could not significantly affect surface roughness and hardness within 60 minutes of immersion in disinfectant solutions or flexural strength within 30 minutes (roughness: P=.79, I2=0%; flexural strength: P=.08, I2=0%; hardness: P=.05, I2=19%). In addition, the physical properties were not significantly affected when glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine, and peracetic acid were repeatedly used for more than 30 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the disinfectants did not reduce the physical properties of denture base resin within 30 minutes of immersion. Glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine, and peracetic acid are recommended if longer immersion or repeated disinfection is required.

Comparative analysis of cytotoxicity effects of two denture hard lining materials on human gingival fibroblasts: an in vitro study

Background

The objective of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of TDV and Rebase II denture hard liners on human gingival fibroblasts, aiming to address issues associated with incomplete polymerization and free monomers that affect material properties.

Methods

Seventy-two specimens (24 each of TDV, Rebase II, and controls) were prepared under aseptic conditions according to factory instructions. Cytotoxicity was determined using the MTT test with methyl tetrazolium salt added to the cell culture medium. A two-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Tukey test was used to evaluate the results of incubation before mitochondrial activity was measured using Multiscan spectrophotometry (570 nm).

Results

There were significant differences in cell viability between the groups after 24 hours (P < 0.001), with TDV having higher viability than Rebase II. The difference between Rebase II and TDV, however, was not significant at 48 and 96 hours (P > 0.131). At 24 hours, Rebase II exhibited significantly lower viability than TDV liner, with a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Due to the maximum monomer release in the early hours of incubation, the amount of cytotoxicity decreased with increasing incubation time.

In vitro evaluation of shape-memory hydrogels for removable dental prostheses and optimization of phase-transition temperature for intraoral use

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Removable dental prostheses require periodic relining with the loss of intaglio surface fit because of mucosal shape changes over time. Therefore, a new material with high adaptability to tissue changes over time would be beneficial.

PURPOSE

This study focused on a shape-memory gel (SMG) that softens when heated, retains its shape when cooled, and returns to its original shape when reheated. The purpose was to optimize SMG for intraoral use by controlling the ratio of 2 acrylate monomers and to evaluate the changes in the shape memory and physical properties of SMG with temperature and to evaluate biocompatibility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

SMG specimens were synthesized using the following mixing ratios of 2 monomers, docosyl acrylate (DA) and stearyl acrylate (SA): 0:100, 25:75, 50:50, 75:25, and 100:0. SMG specimens were photopolymerized using a fluorescent light-polymerizing unit. To evaluate shape memory as a function of temperature, permanent deformation was measured based on the standardized compression set test for thermoplastic rubber. For evaluation of the physical properties and cytotoxicity, a 3-dimensionally printed denture base material was used as the control material. All assessments were compared between the groups by using 1-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test (α=.05).

RESULTS

SMGs with a higher amount of DA maintained their compressed shape at room and intraoral temperatures. However, the SMG matrices softened and recovered their original shapes above 60 °C. SMGs showed Shore A hardness equivalent to that of the denture-base polymer material at intraoral temperatures because of the high phase-transition temperature. The low water solubility of SMGs supported the biocompatibility test results.

CONCLUSIONS

SMG, in which the phase-transition temperature was controlled by mixing acrylate monomers with different melting points, exhibited shape memory in the intraoral environment. The results indicate the feasibility of applying SMG for the fabrication of removable dental prostheses because of its high adaptability to tissue changes over time and biocompatibility.

Anti-biofilm effectiveness of protocols for cleaning complete dentures in hospitalized patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Denture biofilm acts as a potential reservoir for respiratory pathogens, considerably increasing the risk of lung infections, specifically aspiration pneumonia, mainly 48h after hospital admission. The establishment of a straightforward, affordable, and applicable hygiene protocol in a hospital environment for the effective control of denture biofilm can be particularly useful to prevent respiratory infections or reduce the course of established lung disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the anti-biofilm effectiveness of denture cleaning protocols in hospitalized patients.

METHODOLOGY

The maxillary complete dentures (MCDs) of 340 hospitalized participants were randomly cleaned once using one of the following 17 protocols (n=20): brushing with distilled water, toothpaste, or neutral liquid soap (controls); immersion in chemical solutions (1% sodium hypochlorite, alkaline peroxide, 0.12% or 2% chlorhexidine digluconate), or microwave irradiation (650 W for 3 min) combined or not with brushing. Before and after the application of the protocols, the biofilm of the intaglio surface of the MCDs was evaluated using two methods: denture biofilm coverage area (%) and microbiological quantitative cultures on blood agar and Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (CFU/mL). Data were subjected to the Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α=0.05).

RESULTS

All 17 protocols significantly reduced the percentage area of denture biofilm and microbial and fungal load (P<0.05). The highest percentage reductions in the area of denture biofilm were observed for 1% hypochlorite solution with or without brushing and for 2% chlorhexidine solution and microwave irradiation only in association with brushing (P<0.05). The greatest reductions in microbial and fungal load were found for the groups that used solutions of 2% chlorhexidine and 1% hypochlorite and microwave irradiation, regardless of the association with brushing (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A single immersion for 10 min in 1% sodium hypochlorite, even in the absence of brushing, proved to be a straightforward, rapid, low-cost, and effective protocol for cleaning the dentures of hospitalized patients.

Effect of immersion in disinfectants on the color stability of denture base resins and artificial teeth obtained by 3D printing

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of immersion in disinfecting solutions on the color stability of denture base resins and artificial teeth obtained by 3D printing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty discs (15 × 3 mm) were obtained for each group: Lucitone 550 and Cosmos Denture 3D (denture base resins), Duralay and Cosmos TEMP 3D (artificial teeth resins). The discs were immersed in disinfectant solutions: Corega Tabs, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate, 0.25% sodium hypochlorite, and distilled water. Color measurements were obtained with a spectrophotometer before immersion in disinfectants and after the simulated periods of 6 and 12 months. Data (ΔE00 ) were submitted to mixed three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test.

RESULTS

For denture base resins, Cosmos Denture 3D showed greater color change regardless of the solution and immersion time. The immersion time of 6 months influenced the color change of the denture base resins regardless of the disinfectant solution. For the artificial teeth resins, the immersion time of 12 months showed a significant color change when compared to 6 months. Cosmos TEMP 3D showed greater color change for all solutions, except for 0.25% sodium hypochlorite. Duralay resin showed greater color change in 2% chlorhexidine, regardless of immersion time.

CONCLUSIONS

For denture base resins, the immersion time significantly changed the color regardless of the solution. For artificial teeth resins, Cosmos TEMP 3D showed greater color changes in all solutions when compared to Duralay, except for 0.25% sodium hypochlorite. Chlorhexidine digluconate significantly changed the color of Duralay.

Different Polymers for the Base of Removable Dentures? Part II: A Narrative Review of the Dynamics of Microbial Plaque Formation on Dentures

This review focuses on the current disparities and gaps in research on the characteristics of the oral ecosystem of denture wearers, making a unique contribution to the literature on this topic. We aimed to synthesize the literature on the state of current knowledge concerning the biological behavior of the different polymers used in prosthetics. Whichever polymer is used in the composition of the prosthetic base (poly methyl methacrylate acrylic (PMMA), polyamide (PA), or polyether ether ketone (PEEK)), the simple presence of a removable prosthesis in the oral cavity can disturb the balance of the oral microbiota. This phenomenon is aggravated by poor oral hygiene, resulting in an increased microbial load coupled with the reduced salivation that is associated with older patients. In 15-70% of patients, this imbalance leads to the appearance of inflammation under the prosthesis (denture stomatitis, DS). DS is dependent on the equilibrium-as well as on the reciprocal, fragile, and constantly dynamic conditions-between the host and the microbiome in the oral cavity. Several local and general parameters contribute to this balance. Locally, the formation of microbial plaque on dentures (DMP) depends on the phenomena of adhesion, aggregation, and accumulation of microorganisms. To limit DMP, apart from oral and lifestyle hygiene, the prosthesis must be polished and regularly immersed in a disinfectant bath. It can also be covered with an insulating coating. In the long term, relining and maintenance of the prosthesis must also be established to control microbial proliferation. On the other hand, several general conditions specific to the host (aging; heredity; allergies; diseases such as diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular, respiratory, or digestive diseases; and immunodeficiencies) can make the management of DS difficult. Thus, the second part of this review addresses the complexity of the management of DMP depending on the polymer used. The methodology followed in this review comprised the formulation of a search strategy, definition of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and selection of studies for analysis. The PubMed database was searched independently for pertinent studies. A total of 213 titles were retrieved from the electronic databases, and after applying the exclusion criteria, we selected 84 articles on the possible microbial interactions between the prosthesis and the oral environment, with a particular emphasis on Candida albicans.

Effectiveness of disinfectant solutions associated or not with brushing on the biofilm control of a 3D printed-denture base resin

BACKGROUND

The formation of biofilm on denture bases is a recurrent clinical problem that favors the development of denture stomatitis. The effectiveness of a hygiene protocol in a 3D-printed denture base resin is still uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate of the effectiveness of immersion, associated or not with brushing in a soap solution, on the biofilm control of a 3D-printed denture base resin.

METHODOLOGY

Specimens of denture base resins [Cosmos Denture (COS) and Classico (CLA/control)] were contaminated in vitro with Candida albicans and immersed in sodium hypochlorite 0.25% (SH, alkaline peroxide) AP, chlorhexidine digluconate 2% (CD or PBS-Control), associated or not with brushing with 0.78% Lifebuoy soap. Roughness was evaluated before and after brushing and immersion. The effectiveness of the protocols was assessed by CFU/mL, cellular metabolism (XTT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and confocal scanning laser microscopy. Data were analyzed by T student, ANOVA/Welch, and Tukey/Gomes-Howell pos-hoc tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

CLA showed greater roughness than COS. CFU/mL and XTT were higher in COS resin with a higher hyphae formation. Immersion in SH and CD eliminated CFU/mL and reduced XTT for both resins, associated or not with brushing. AP reduced CFU/mL only when associated with brushing.

CONCLUSIONS

The biofilm on the 3D-printed resin was thicker and presumably more pathogenic, regardless of its smoother surface. Immersions in SH 0.25% and CD 2% are effective hygiene protocols for both resins, associated or not with brushing. AP should be recommended when associated with brushing with a Lifebuoy 0.78% solution.

The study of the cytotoxic effect of disinfectants

The toxicity of individual disinfectants has been studied in vitro using human cell cultures (HT-29 (epithelial-like cells of colon adenocarcinoma), HEK 293 (human embryonic kidney cells)) to create a model for assessing the toxicity of residual amounts of disinfectants that can enter milk for a person. Standard tests have been used to assess cell viability and amount: methyl tetrazolium (MTT) test, neutral red cell staining (NRP), and sulforhodamine B (SRB) test. Disinfectants have a dose- and time-dependent cytotoxic effect on human cell cultures. IC50avg (concentration of the drug that suppresses a certain cell function by 50%) of disinfectants based on the effect on cell cultures (average value) is Biodez – 117.29 ±14 μl/l, Blanidas – 389.25 ±20.83 μl/l, Virkon-S – 343.04 ±28.04 μl/l, Neochlor  – 473.82 ±30.16 μl/l, Phan – 56.71 ±7.05 μl/l, Chlorination – 343.28 ±27.26 μl/l, Chlorinated lime – 117.35 ±9.44 μl/l. Mean toxic doses for cell cultures are lower than the mean lethal dose (based on literature data) for rats and mice by gastric administration. The novelty is that determining the cytotoxicity of disinfectants in vitro using human cell cultures can significantly reduce the number of animals for establishing LD50 during the registration procedure of new agents, making it possible to make preliminary conclusions about the toxicity of substances at the stage of chemical screening, preliminary hygienic regulation, identify target organs of toxic influence.

Recent update on potential cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and preventive measures of biomaterials used in dentistry

Dental treatment is provided for a wide variety of oral health problems like dental caries, periodontal diseases, periapical infections, replacement of missing teeth and orthodontic problems. Various biomaterials, like composite resins, amalgam, glass ionomer cement, acrylic resins, metal alloys, impression materials, bone grafts, membranes, local anaesthetics, etc., are used for dental applications. The physical and chemical characteristics of these materials influence the outcome of dental treatment. It also impacts on the biological, allergic and toxic potential of biomaterials. With innovations in science and their positive results, there is also a need for awareness about the biological risks of these biomaterials. The aim of dental treatment is to have effective, yet safe, and long-lasting results for the benefit of patients. For this, it is important to have a thorough understanding of biomaterials and their effects on local and systemic health. Materials used in dentistry undergo a series of analyses before their oral applications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and original review that discusses the reasons for and studies on the toxicity of commonly used biomaterials for applications in dentistry. It will help clinicians to formulate a methodical approach for the selection of dental biomaterials, thus providing an awareness for forecasting their risk of toxic reactions.

Impact of household vinegar on calculus removal and mechanical properties of orthodontic resin

PURPOSE

This study evaluated calculus removal efficacy of household vinegar and its effect on autopolymerizing orthodontic resin following repeated immersion.

METHODS

A total of 72 sectioned specimens of orthodontic retainers with calculus deposits following cleaning with the help of immersion in vinegar of different dilutions between 12.5% and 100%, tap water, effervescent tablets, and mechanical debridement were digitally analyzed. Changes in Ca and Fe ions in vinegar were assessed by atomic emission spectroscopy (AES). For mechanical testing, autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) samples were similarly grouped and immersed for 78 cycles and their flexural strength and hardness measured. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed to evaluate changes in their chemical composition. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used to analyze the differences in the mean flexural strength and hardness between the groups (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

A minimum immersion of 2 h in 25% vinegar solution combined with brushing attained efficiency of 74.13 ± 22% calculus removal. Whereas, tap water and effervescent tablets had 15% and 49% efficiency, respectively. AES results showed diffusion of Ca ions from calculus into the vinegar solution as a plausible mechanism for its structural weakening and removal. Results of mechanical testing showed that undiluted vinegar solution affected the flexural strength of PMMA and this effect was significantly different from that of the effervescent tablets and the remaining vinegar concentrations. There was no significant difference in hardness between the groups. The FTIR showed no changes in the chemical composition of PMMA samples following repeated immersions.

CONCLUSION

Vinegar can be useful in the removal of calculus from dental appliances but should be used in diluted forms to minimize side effects.

Regimen and different surfaces interfere with photodynamic therapy on Candida albicans biofilms

The aim of this study is to compare antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) against Candida albicans biofilms formed on two different substrates - acrylic resin or bottom of polystyrene plate; and two aPDT application regimens - twice-daily over the course of 48 h or single treatment after 48 h biofilm formation. C. albicans SN425 biofilms cultivated on Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium were incubated for 5 min with toluidine blue O (44 μM) used as a photosensitizer before red light (635 nm; 175.2 J/cm2) exposure for 2 min. As negative control, ultrapure water, and as positive control 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) were used. Biofilms were analyzed for colony forming units (CFU) and cells morphology by confocal scanning laser microscopy. Single treatment and twice-daily aPDT on polystyrene plate and single treatment on acrylic resin did not significantly reduce the CFU (p > 0.05); in contrast, twice-daily aPDT on acrylic resin has reduced C. albicans below the detection limit, similarly to CHX treatment. Single aPDT treatment on polystyrene plate and on the resin presented a bulky and homogeneous biofilm predominantly formed by pseudohyphae. In contrast, in the resin group, the biofilm treated twice-daily with aPDT was predominantly formed by yeast cells, whilst pseudohyphae were occasionally visible. In conclusion, biofilms formed on polystyrene plates are more resistant to aPDT than biofilms formed on acrylic resin. Moreover, applying aPDT twice-daily reduces C. albicans biofilm development on acrylic resin and is a better approach against C. albicans biofilms than one single application on the mature biofilm.