Fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated from conventional impressions and digital scans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Does the Restoration Design and Material Affect Indirect Restorations' Marginal and Internal Gap, Interfacial Volume, and Fatigue Behavior?

OBJECTIVES

 This article evaluates the marginal and internal gap, interfacial volume, and fatigue behavior in computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorations with different designs (crowns or endocrowns) made from lithium disilicate-based ceramic (LD, IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar AG) or resin composite (RC, Tetric CAD, Ivoclar AG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Simplified LD and RC crowns (-C) and endocrowns (-E) were produced (n = 10) using CAD-CAM technology, through scanning (CEREC Primescan, Dentsply Sirona) and milling (CEREC MC XL, Dentsply Sirona), and then adhesively bonded to fiberglass-reinforced epoxy resin. Computed microtomography was used to assess the marginal and internal gap and interfacial volume. A cyclic fatigue test (20 Hz, initial load = 100 N/5,000 cycles; step-size = 50 N/10,000 cycles until 1,500 N, if specimens survived, the step-size = 100 N/10,000 cycles until failure) was performed. Topography, finite element analysis (FEA), and fractography were also executed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc tests were employed (α = 0.05) for marginal and internal gap and interfacial volume. Survival analysis based on Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox tests (α = 0.05) was used for fatigue data.

RESULTS

 RC crowns demonstrated the smallest marginal gap, LD crowns the largest. Endocrowns presented intermediary marginal gap values. Internal gaps were all above the planned 120 µm space. The lowest gap was seen at the cervical-axial angle at crowns, regardless of material. At the axio-occlusal angle, LD crowns presented a lower gap than RC; meanwhile, there was no difference among endocrowns. When comparing occlusal/pulpal space, LD crowns showed the lowest values, and RC-C, LD-E, and RC-E were statistically similar. Fatigue testing revealed superior behavior for RC restorations, withstanding higher loads and more cycles before failure compared to LD. FEA indicated that the crowns required higher stress concentration to unleash their failure than endocrowns. Fractographic features confirm failure origin at surface defects located at the restoration/cement intaglio surface, where it concentrated the highest maximum principal stress.

CONCLUSION

 RC crowns and endocrowns presented lower marginal gaps than LD ones. Differences in other internal gap outcomes exist but within a nonclinically relevant threshold. The restoration fatigue behavior was influenced by the CAD-CAM material, but not by its design.

Implant scanning workflows: Accuracy of registration methods for integrating intraoral scans containing soft tissue and tooth position information

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

An implant scanning workflow involves recording different intraoral scans containing all the information needed to fabricate an implant-supported prosthesis. The accuracy of these implant scanning workflow registration methods remains unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of different implant scanning workflows for registering the soft tissue and tooth position information scans recorded by using 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A maxillary edentulous stone cast with 6 implant abutment analogs (MultiUnit Abutment Replica) and 2 screw-retained implant-supported interim restorations (from the right first molar to the left canine and from the left first premolar to the left first molar) were obtained. Three markers were attached on the palatal surface of the cast on the anterior palatine raphe and right and left first molar positions, and 4 markers were attached on the palatal surface of the right and left second premolar and right and left lateral incisor of the interim prostheses. Afterwards, 5 composite resin (CR) reference landmarks were created on the palatal surface of the cast on the anterior palatine raphe, right and left first premolar, and right and left first molar. Additionally, a screw was placed in the posterior palatine raphe, simulating a temporary anchorage device (TAD). The interim prostheses were positioned in the implant analogs of the cast and digitized by using a laboratory scanner (T710). Five groups were created depending on the IOS: TRIOS 5, i700, Elite, iTero, and Primescan groups. A tooth position, soft tissue information, and soft tissue with existing teeth scans were obtained by using each IOS. Six subgroups were created depending on the reference landmarks used to register the scans: 3 or 5 CR landmarks (3CR or 5RC subgroup, respectively), existing teeth (teeth subgroup), existing teeth combined with 2 CR landmarks (teeth+2CR subgroup), TAD (TAD subgroup), TAD combined with 1 CR landmark (TAD+1CR subgroup). Twelve linear measurements were performed on the control scans and on each specimen among the 7 markers. Trueness was analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA and the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=.05). Precision was evaluated by using the Levene and pairwise comparisons tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

Trueness discrepancies were found among the groups (P<.001) and subgroups (P<.001), with a significant group*subgroup interaction (P=.004). The Tukey test showed that the Primescan and iTero systems obtained worse trueness than the other groups. Also, the TAD and Teeth subgroups obtained worse trueness than the other subgroups tested. All the groups and subgroups were significantly different from each other (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The IOS and reference landmarks tested impacted the trueness and precision of the registration of soft tissue and tooth position information scans.

Influence of scan extension on the accuracy of maximum intercuspal position recorded by using intraoral scanners or an artificial intelligence-based program

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Intraoral scanners (IOSs) and artificial intelligence (AI) based programs can be used to locate the maximum intercuspal position (MIP). However, the influence of scan extension on the accuracy of the MIP located by using these technologies is uncertain.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the effect of scan extension on the accuracy of the MIP located by using 3 IOSs and an AI-based program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Stone casts mounted in an articulator in MIP were digitized (T710). Two groups were created: complete- (CA group) and half arch (HA group) scan. In the CA-group, complete arch scans of the reference casts were captured with each IOS tested. The nonarticulated scans were duplicated 20 times. In the HA-groups, the right half arch scans of the reference casts were captured with each IOS tested. Six subgroups were generated: 3 IOS (Primescan-IOS, i700-IOS, and Aoralscan3-IOS) and 3 AI (Primescan-AI, i700-AI, and Aoralscan3-AI) subgroups. In the CA-Primescan-IOS subgroup, 10 duplicated scans were articulated in MIP by recording a bilateral occlusal record. In the CA-Primescan-AI subgroup, 10 duplicated scans were articulated in MIP by using an AI-based program (Bitefinder). In the CA-i700-IOS, CA-Aoralscan3-IOS, CA-i700-AI, and CA-Aoralscan3-AI subgroups, the same procedures as in the CA-Primescan-IOS and CA-Primescan-AI subgroups were completed, respectively. In the HA-Primescan-IOS subgroup, 10 duplicated scans were articulated in MIP by capturing a right occlusal record. In the HA-Primescan-AI subgroup, 10 duplicated scans were articulated in MIP by using the AI-based program. In the HA-i700-IOS, HA-Aoralscan3-IOS, HA-i700-AI, and HA-Aoralscan3-AI subgroups, the same procedures as in the HA-Primescan-IOS subgroups were completed, respectively. A program (Geomagic) was used to calculate 36 interlandmark measurements on the virtual articulated casts (control) and each specimen. Three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyze trueness (α=.05). The Levene and pairwise multiple comparison tests were used to analyze precision (α=.05).

RESULTS

MIP trueness discrepancies were found between the IOS (P<.001), groups (P<.001), and subgroups (P<.001), with a significant interaction IOS×subgroup (P<.001), group×subgroup (P<.001), and IOS×group×subgroup (P<.001). The Primescan and i700 (P=.014) and the Primescan and Aoralscan3 (P<.001) were different from each other. The CA and HA groups (P<.001) were different from each other. The IOS and AI subgroups (P<.001) were different from each other. The Levene test showed significant precision discrepancies between the groups (P<.001) and subgroups (P<.001). The HA scans demonstrated significantly worse precision than the CA scans (P<.001). Additionally, the AI-based program obtained significantly worse precision than the IOS programs tested (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Scan extension and program impacted the trueness and precision of the MIP. CA groups demonstrated better MIP trueness and worse precision than the HA groups. Primescan obtained better MIP trueness than the i700 and Aoralscan3 systems. The IOSs revealed better MIP trueness and precision than the AI-based program tested.

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner Systems for Fabricating Inlay, Onlay, and Veneer Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for fabricating inlay, onlay, and veneer restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was completed in five databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. A manual search was also conducted. Two methods have been used to assess the accuracy of IOSs for fabricating inlay, onlay, and veneer restorations: accuracy of the definitive virtual casts and the marginal and internal discrepancies of inlay, onlay, and veneer restorations fabricated by using IOSs. Included articles were classified into two groups: definitive virtual casts accuracy and restoration fit. Two investigators evaluated the studies independently by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal. A third examiner was consulted to resolve any lack of consensus.

RESULTS

Thirty four articles were included: 17 analyzed the accuracy of definitive virtual casts and 17 assessed the marginal and internal discrepancies. Regarding the accuracy of definitive virtual casts, a trueness of 27.47 μm (p < 0.001) in the inlay subgroup and 64.15 μm (p < 0.001) in the onlay subgroup were found among the IOSs tested. For digitizing inlay preparations, a trueness of 12.29 μm (p < 0.001) in the Primescan, 69.34 μm (p < 0.001) in the Omnicam, 38.39 μm (p < 0.001) in the Trios 3, 52.96 μm (p < 0.001) in the Trios, and 28.90 μm (p < 0.001) in the CS3500 were found. A trueness of 53.00 μm (I2 = 99%, p < 0.001) in the Omnicam. Also, a precision of 19.88 μm (p < 0.001) in the inlay subgroup and 19.69 μm (p < 0.001) in the onlay subgroup was obtained. Furthermore, a nonsignificant test result for subgroup differences (p = 0.06) in the marginal discrepancy between conventional and IOS methods was found with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99%, p < 0.001). However, a significant test result for subgroup differences (p < 0.001) in the internal discrepancy values was found with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 72%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IOSs and restoration type influenced the accuracy of the definitive virtual casts. A Better trueness and worse precision was found on the definitive virtual cast of inlay restorations when compared with those of onlay restorations. The impression method used did not impact the marginal discrepancy of inlay and onlay restorations. However, a higher internal discrepancy was found in the inlay and onlay restorations fabricated by using conventional methods, but the discrepancy was not significant. Studies are needed to assess the accuracy of definitive virtual casts for fabricating veneer restorations captured by using IOSs and to measure the fit of the veneer restorations fabricated by using IOSs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Intraoral scanners provide a reliable method for fabricating inlay and onlay restorations. The accuracy of IOSs for fabricating veneer restorations remains uncertain.

Digital scans versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: An overview of systematic reviews

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Several systematic reviews have compared the accuracy of conventional impression making and digital recording techniques, with sometimes different results. A systematic overview of these studies is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this overview of systematic reviews was to examine the accuracy of digital scans and conventional impressions for tooth- or implant-supported fixed restorations in partially and completely edentulous adult patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were searched for systematic reviews according to preset eligibility criteria. Two calibrated evaluators screened and assessed the overall confidence of the included reviews using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool. Several review characteristics were recorded, including accuracy in terms of trueness and/or precision. The Jadad et al1 decision algorithm was used to select the best evidence, and a citation matrix was used to show overlaps in the studies.

RESULTS

From the 307 studies that were retrieved, 28 systematic reviews were included in this overview. Among these, 12 performed meta-analyses, and 18 comprised both in vitro and in vivo primary studies. Generally, digital scanning and conventional impression techniques for crowns and fixed partial dentures, for implant-supported fixed restorations, and for both tooth- and implant-supported restorations showed no statistically significant differences in terms of accuracy (trueness and precision) and marginal and internal adaptation (P>.05). However, conventional impressions outperformed digital scans for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses in terms of accuracy. Regarding methodological quality, most systematic reviews (67.9%) received critically low overall confidence based on AMSTAR 2.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were reported in terms of marginal and internal fit between prosthetic restorations constructed after digital scanning and conventional impression making. The opportunity exists to enhance the methodological quality of systematic reviews with regard to the accuracy of dental recordings.

An overview of artificial intelligence based applications for assisting digital data acquisition and implant planning procedures

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the current artificial intelligence (AI) based applications for assisting digital data acquisition and implant planning procedures.

OVERVIEW

A review of the main AI-based applications integrated into digital data acquisitions technologies (facial scanners (FS), intraoral scanners (IOSs), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, and jaw trackers) and computer-aided static implant planning programs are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The main AI-based application integrated in some FS's programs involves the automatic alignment of facial and intraoral scans for virtual patient integration. The AI-based applications integrated into IOSs programs include scan cleaning, assist scanning, and automatic alignment between the implant scan body with its corresponding CAD object while scanning. The more frequently AI-based applications integrated into the programs of CBCT units involve positioning assistant, noise and artifacts reduction, structures identification and segmentation, airway analysis, and alignment of facial, intraoral, and CBCT scans. Some computer-aided static implant planning programs include patient's digital files, identification, labeling, and segmentation of anatomical structures, mandibular nerve tracing, automatic implant placement, and surgical implant guide design.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of select 2023 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertize in their subject areas that include (in order of appearance here): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and oral radiology; and dental caries and cariology. The authors have focused their efforts on presenting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on current innovations, new materials and processes, emerging technology, and future trends in dentistry. With the overwhelming volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to inform and update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope readers find this work helpful in providing evidence-based care to patients seeking healthier and happier lives.

Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) can be affected by operator handling; however, the scanning area and accuracy discrepancies acquired at different scanning distances and angulations among IOSs remain uncertain.

PURPOSE

The objective of this in vitro study was to compare the scanning area and scanning accuracy of the intraoral digital scans obtained at 3 scanning distances with 4 different scanning angulations among 4 different IOSs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A reference device (reference file) was designed with 4 inclinations (0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees) and printed. Four groups were created based on the IOS: i700, TRIOS4, CS 3800, and iTero scanners. Four subgroups were generated depending on the scanning angulation (0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees). Each subgroup was divided into 3 subgroups based on the scanning distance: 0, 2, and 4 mm (N=720, n=15). The reference devices were positioned in a z-axis calibrated platform for standardizing the scanning distance. In the i700-0-0 subgroup, the 0-degree reference device was positioned in the calibrated platform. The wand of the IOS was positioned in a supporting framework with a 0-mm scanning distance, and the scans were acquired. In the i700-0-2 subgroup, the platform was lowered for a 2-mm scanning distance followed by the specimen acquisition. In the i700-0-4 subgroup, the platform was further lowered for a 4-mm scanning distance, and the scans were obtained. For the i700-15, i700-30, and i700-45 subgroups, the same procedures were carried out as in the i700-0 subgroups respectively, but with the 10-, 15-, 30-, or 45-degree reference device. Similarly, the same procedures were completed for all the groups with the corresponding IOS. The area of each scan was measured. The reference file was used to measure the discrepancy with the experimental scans by using the root mean square (RMS) error. Three-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey pairwise comparison tests were used to analyze the scanning area data. Kruskal-Wallis and multiple pairwise comparison tests were used to analyze the RMS data (α=.05).

RESULTS

IOS (P<.001), scanning distance (P<.001), and scanning angle (P<.001) were significant factors of the scanning area measured among the subgroups tested. A significant group×subgroup interaction was found (P<.001). The iTero and the TRIOS4 groups obtained higher scanning area mean values than the i700 and CS 3800 groups. The CS 3800 obtained the lowest scanning area among the IOS groups tested. The 0-mm subgroups obtained a significantly lower scanning area than the 2- and 4-mm subgroups (P<.001). The 0- and 30-degree subgroups obtained a significantly lower scanning area than the 15- and 45-degree subgroups (P<.001). The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant median RMS discrepancies (P<.001). All the IOS groups were significantly different from each other (P<.001), except for the CS 3800 and TRIOS4 groups (P>.999). All the scanning distance groups were different from each other (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Scanning area and scanning accuracy were influenced by the IOS, scanning distance, and scanning angle selected to acquire the digital scans.

Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Digital systems including intraoral scanners (IOSs) and optical jaw tracking systems can be used to acquire the maxillomandibular relationship at the centric relation (CR). However, the discrepancy of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at the CR position when using digital methods remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at the CR position using a conventional procedure, 4 different IOSs, and an optical jaw tracking system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A completely dentate volunteer was selected. A Kois deprogrammer (KD) was fabricated. Six groups were created based on the technique used to obtain diagnostic casts and record the maxillomandibular relationship at the CR position: conventional procedures (CNV group), 4 IOS groups: TRIOS4 (TRIOS4 group), iTero Element 5D (iTero group), i700 wireless (i700 group), Primescan (Primescan group), and a jaw tracking system (Modjaw) (Modjaw group) (n=10). In the CNV group, conventional diagnostic stone casts were obtained. A facebow record was used to mount the maxillary cast on an articulator (Panadent). The KD was used to obtain a CR record for mounting the mandibular cast, and the mounted casts were digitized by using a scanner (T710) to acquire the reference scans. In the TRIOS group, intraoral scans were obtained and duplicated 10 times. The KD was used to obtain a bilateral virtual occlusal record at the CR position. To acquire the specimens of the iTero, i700, and Primescan groups, the procedures in the TRIOS4 group were followed, but with the corresponding IOS. In the Modjaw group, the KD was used to record and export the maxillomandibular relationship at the CR position. Articulated virtual casts of each group were exported. Thirty-six interlandmark linear measurements were computed on both the reference and experimental scans. The distances obtained on the reference scan were used to calculate the discrepancies with the distances obtained on each experimental scan. The data were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship record were significantly affected by the technique used (P<.001). The maxillomandibular relationship trueness values from high to low were iTero (0.14 ±0.09 mm), followed by the Modjaw (0.20 ±0.04 mm) and the TRIOS4 (0.22 ±0.09 mm) groups. However, the iTero, Modjaw, and TRIOS4 groups were not significantly different from each other (P>.05). The i700 group obtained the lowest trueness and precision values (0.40 ±0.22 mm) of all groups tested, followed by the Primescan grop (0.26±0.13 mm); however, the i700 and Primescan groups had significantly lower trueness and precision than only the iTero group (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship recorded at the CR position were influenced by the different digital techniques tested.

[Research progress on accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaw]

With the rapid development of implant techniques and digital technology, intraoral digital impressions have become a commonly used impression method in implant restoration. At present, the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions directly applied to implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaw remains inadequate. This is due to the high accuracy requirement of full-arch implant impressions, while there are still technical challenges in intraoral digital impressions about recognition and stitching. In this regard, scholars have proposed a variety of scanning strategies to improve the accuracy of intraoral scans, including mucosal modifications, auxiliary devices and novel scan bodies. At the same time, as a new digital impression technique, stereo photogrammetry has been developing steadily and exhibits promising accuracy. This article reviews the research progress on the accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impressions and techniques which can improve the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions thus providing a reference for clinical application.

Calibrated splinting framework for complete arch intraoral implant digital scans manufactured by combining milled and additively manufacturing technologies: A dental technique

Splinting frameworks are intended to increase the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital implant scans. This article describes a technique that uses a calibrated splinting framework manufactured by combining milled and additively manufacturing technologies (IOSRing) for assisting with complete arch intraoral digital implant scanning. The splinting framework contains milled truncated cone-shape markers whose position in the metal framework is measured during the manufacturing process with a coordinate measurement machine. This framework splints the modified implant scan bodies and assists in the complete arch intraoral implant digital scanning. Computer-aided design procedures are then used to calculate the implant position on the virtual definitive implant cast by using the position of the calibrated markers as a reference.

Enhancing Fixed Partial Denture Pontic Fabrication: An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Digital and Manual Techniques

Background Advancements in computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) technology have significantly improved the accuracy and consistency of producing fixed partial dentures (FPDs) compared to traditional manual methods. However, the fully digital transfer of mock-up morphology to final FPDs is not yet fully explored. Proper pontic design, which avoids direct gingival contact, is essential for maintaining oral hygiene and preventing tissue irritation. Aim and objectives This study aims to compare the effectiveness of digital versus manual methods in FPD pontic fabrication, focusing on the trueness of digitally fabricated FPD patterns. Key objectives include assessing thickness, vertical gaps, and anatomical accuracy to determine the advantages of CAD-CAM technologies over traditional techniques. Materials and methods In this in vitro study, a total of 45 FPD pontics were fabricated and divided into three groups (15 each): digitally fabricated (using CAD software and CAM systems), manually fabricated (using traditional wax-up techniques), and a control group (typodont teeth). Tooth preparation was performed on a typodont, and impressions were taken to create casts. One cast was scanned and digitally designed, while the other was used for manual fabrication. Outcome assessments included vertical gap measurement using a stereo microscope, thickness evaluation with a digital caliper, and anatomical similarity assessment by independent evaluators. Statistical analysis involved one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc Tukey's analysis, and unpaired t-tests using SPSS software version 26.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results The digital group exhibited lower mean thickness at the incisal (1.92±0.130 mm vs. 2.46±0.219 mm for manual, p=0.000), middle (7.00±0.223 mm vs. 8.88±0.983 mm for manual, p=0.001), and cervical sites (9.06±0.134 mm vs. 10.08±0.454 mm for manual, p=0.000). No significant differences were found between the digital and control groups. No significant differences were observed between digital, manual, and control groups at any site (p=0.688 to 0.997). The digital group demonstrated superior accuracy and consistency compared to the control group (mean value of 1.00±0.00 vs. 2.93±0.798, p=0.000). Conclusion CAD-CAM technology greatly improves the precision and consistency of FPD pontic fabrication compared to traditional manual techniques. Digital methods produce thinner pontics with superior anatomical accuracy, although vertical gap measurements are similar across methods. These findings emphasize the benefits of CAD-CAM in enhancing prosthetic outcomes and suggest potential improvements in clinical practices for prosthodontic rehabilitation.

Effect of cement spacer on fit accuracy and fracture strength of 3-unit and 4-unit zirconia frameworks

BACKGROUND

Cement spacer is essential for compensating deformation of zirconia restoration after sintering shrinkage, allowing proper seating and better fracture resistance of the restoration. Studies assessing the effect of cement spacer on fit accuracy and fracture strength of zirconia frameworks are missing in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different cement spacer settings on fit accuracy and fracture strength of 3-unit and 4-unit zirconia frameworks.

METHODS

Sixty standardized stainless-steel master dies were manufactured with 2 prepared abutments for fabricating 3-unit and 4-unit zirconia frameworks. The frameworks were assigned into 6 groups (n = 10) according to cement spacer setting (30 μm, 50 μm, and 80 μm) as follows: 3-unit frameworks; 3u-30, 3u-50, 3u-80, and 4-unit frameworks; 4u-30, 4u-50, and 4u-80. The frameworks were assessed for fit accuracy with the replica method. The specimens were cemented to their corresponding dies, and the fracture strength was measured in a universal testing machine. The Weibull parameters were calculated for the study groups and fractured specimens were inspected for failure mode. Two-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for pairwise comparison between study groups (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The cement spacer had a significant effect on both fit accuracy and fracture strength for 3-unit and 4-unit frameworks. The 50 μm spacer had significantly better fit accuracy followed by 80 μm, and 30 μm spacers. Both 50 μm and 80 μm spacers had similar fracture strength, and both had significantly better strength than 30 μm spacer.

CONCLUSIONS

For both 3-unit and 4-unit zirconia frameworks, 50 μm cement spacer can be recommended over 30 μm and 80 μm spacers for significantly better fit accuracy and adequate fracture strength.

Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Maxillary and mandibular scans can be articulated in maximum intercuspal position (MIP) by using an artificial intelligence (AI) based program; however, the accuracy of the AI-based program locating the MIP relationship is unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present clinical study was to assess the accuracy of the MIP relationship located by using 4 intraoral scanners (IOSs) and an AI-based program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conventional casts of a participant mounted on an articulator in MIP were digitized (T710). Four groups were created based on the IOS used to record a maxillary and mandibular scan of the participant: TRIOS4, iTero, i700, and PrimeScan. Each pair of nonarticulated scans were duplicated 20 times. Three subgroups were created: IOS, AI-articulated, and AI-IOS-corrected subgroups (n=10). In the IOS-subgroup, 10 duplicated scans were articulated in MIP by using a bilateral occlusal record. In the AI-articulated subgroup, the remaining 10 duplicated scans were articulated in MIP by using an AI-based program (BiteFinder). In the AI-IOS-corrected subgroup, the same AI-based program was used to correct the occlusal collisions of the articulated specimens obtained in the IOS-subgroup. A reverse engineering program (Geomagic Wrap) was used to calculate 36 interlandmark measurements on the digitized articulated casts (control) and each articulated specimen. Two-way ANOVA and pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests were used to analyze trueness (α=.05). The Levene and pairwise multiple comparison Wilcoxon rank tests were used to analyze precision (α=.05).

RESULTS

Significant trueness discrepancies among the groups (P<.001) and subgroups (P<.001) were found, with a significant interaction group×subgroup (P<.001). The Levene test showed significant precision discrepancies among the groups (P<.001) and subgroups (P=.005). The TRIOS4 and iTero groups obtained better trueness and lower precision than the i700 and PrimeScan systems. Additionally, the AI-articulated subgroup showed worse trueness and precision than the IOS and AI-IOS-corrected subgroups. The AI-based program improved the MIP trueness of the scans articulated by using the iTero and PrimeScan systems but reduced the MIP trueness of the articulated scans obtained by using the TRIOS4 and i700.

CONCLUSIONS

The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship was impacted by the IOS system and program used to locate the MIP.

Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Different techniques have been proposed for increasing the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using intraoral scanners (IOSs), including a calibrated metal framework (IOSFix); however, its accuracy remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of complete arch scans obtained with connecting and non-connecting the implant scan bodies (ISBs) recorded using intraoral scanners (IOSs), a laboratory scanner (LBS), and photogrammetry (PG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cast with 6 implant abutment analogs was obtained. Six groups were created: TRIOS 4, i700, iTero, CS3800, LBS, and PG groups. The IOSs and LBS groups were divided into 3 subgroups: nonconnected ISBs (ISB), splinted ISBs (SSB), and calibrated framework (CF), (n=15). For the ISB subgroups, an ISB was positioned on each implant abutment analog. For the SSB subgroups, a printed framework was used to connect the ISBs. For the CF subgroups, a calibrated framework (IOSFix) was used to connect the ISBs. For the PG group, scans were captured using a PG (PIC Camera). Implant positions of the reference cast were measured using a coordinate measurement machine, and Euclidean distances were used as a reference to calculate the discrepancies using the same distances obtained on each experimental scan. Wilcoxon squares 2-way ANOVA and pairwise multiple comparisons were used to analyze trueness (α=.05). The Levene test was used to analyze precision (α=.05).

RESULTS

Linear and angular discrepancies were found among the groups (P<.001) and subgroups (P<.001). Linear (P=.008) and angular (P<.001) precision differences were found among the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The digitizing method and technique impacted the trueness and precision of the implant scans. The photogrammetry and calibrated framework groups obtained the best accuracy. Except for TRIOS 4, the calibrated framework method improved the accuracy of the scans obtained by using the IOSs tested.

Digital Protocol to Record Occlusal Analysis in Prosthodontics: A Pilot Study

Background: Digital technologies enable the accurate replication of occlusion, which is pivotal for stability in maximum intercuspation and dynamic occlusion. CAD softwares generates standardized occlusal morphologies requiring significant adjustments. The consideration of individual mandibular movements during restoration leads to better functional integration. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy of a novel, fully digital protocol for occlusal analysis recording in prosthodontics. Methods: Patients needing single or multiple metal-free restorations were included. Teeth underwent horizontal finish line preparation, while restorations on implants were either directly screwed or used multi-unit abutments. A digital impression (Trios 3 Intraoral Scanner) captured the mouth's elements. Dynamic occlusion was recorded via Patient Specific Motion (PSM). After the placement and functionalization of temporary restorations, subsequent scans included various elements, and CAD software (Dental system) was used for the restoration design. Restorations were milled in monolithic zirconia, pressed from CAD/CAM-milled wax, and sintered. Results: An evaluation of 52 restorations in 37 patients indicated high accuracy in restorations manufactured via the fully digital workflow. Monolithic zirconia was predominantly used. Subtractive (17.3%) and additive (7.7%) occlusal adjustments were mainly chairside. Conclusion: This study underscores the efficacy of meticulous verification measures and a centric contact system in reducing the need for clinical occlusal refinements in prosthetic restorations.

Trueness, precision, time-efficiency and cost analysis of chairside additive and subtractive versus lab-based workflows for manufacturing single crowns: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the trueness, precision, time efficiency, and cost of three different workflows for manufacturing single crowns (SCs).

METHODS

A plaster model with a prepared tooth (#15) was scanned with an industrial scanner, and an SC was designed in computer-assisted-design (CAD) software. Ten SCs were printed with a hybrid composite (additive chairside) and a stereolithographic (SLA) printer (Dfab®), 10 SCs were milled in lithium disilicate (subtractive chairside) using a chairside milling unit (inLab MC XL®), and 10 SCs were milled in zirconia (lab-based) using a five-axis laboratory machine (DWX-52D®). All SCs were scanned with the same scanner after polymerization/sinterization. Each scan was superimposed to the marginal area of the original CAD file to evaluate trueness: absolute average (ABS AVG), root mean square (RMS), and (90˚-10˚)/2 percentile were calculated for each group. Marginal adaptation and quality of the occlusal and interproximal contact points were also investigated by two prosthodontists on 3D printed and plaster models. Finally, the three workflows' time efficiency and costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Additive chairside and subtractive lab-based SCs had significantly better marginal trueness than subtractive chairside SCs in all three parameters (ABS AVG, p < 0.01; RMS, p < 0.01; [90˚-10˚]/2, p < 0.01). However, the two prosthodontists found no significant differences between the three manufacturing procedures in the quality of the marginal closure (p = 0.186), interproximal (p = 0.319), and occlusal contacts (p = 0.218). Both time efficiency and cost show a trend favoring the chairside additive workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Chairside additive technology seems to represent a valid alternative for manufacturing definitive SCs, given the high marginal trueness, precision, workflow efficiency and low costs.

STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Additive chairside manufacturing of definitive hybrid composite SCs is now possible and shows high accuracy, time efficiency, and competitive cost.

Effect of modifying occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Cement spacer has a crucial influence on the adaptation of fixed restorations. Recently, digitally fabricated zirconia crowns have become more popular, but studies on the effect of occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally designed and milled zirconia crowns are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of modifying digital occlusal spacer on the marginal and internal fit of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A maxillary molar typodont tooth was prepared for a zirconia crown, scanned with the Medit i700 intraoral scanner (IOS), and the standard tessellation language (STL) file was used to produce 3-dimensionally (3D) printed definitive dies assigned to 3 groups (n=12). All dies were scanned with the IOS, and the obtained STL files were exported to a computer-aided design (CAD) software program for the designing and milling of 36 complete contour zirconia crowns. The zirconia crown design was identical in the 3 groups for all parameters (default parameters in the CAD software program) with a 80-µm radial spacer 1 mm from the finish lines. The occlusal cement spacer was adjusted to 80 µm, 40 µm, and 0 µm for group 80-80, group 40-80, and group 0-80 respectively. The internal and marginal fit of the crowns were measured on their corresponding definitive dies with the replica technique. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test with the Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis of the results (α=.05).

RESULTS

The modification of occlusal cement spacer significantly affected the marginal and internal fit of digitally manufactured crowns (P<.05). Group 0-80 and group 40-80 had similar marginal gap values, which were significantly lower than those of group 80-80 (P<.017). For internal fit accuracy, group 0-80 displayed significantly lower gap values than group 40-80 and group 80-80 for all measured areas. Group 40-80 had significantly lower gap values than group 80-80 at the mid-occlusal and axio-occlusal areas (P<.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Modifying occlusal cement spacer significantly affected the fit of digitally fabricated zirconia crowns. Reducing or eliminating occlusal spacer resulted in significantly improved fit accuracy.

A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses

OBJECTIVES

To describe a new classification for intraoral scans based on the scan extension and to introduce a decision guideline to choose the scan extension for fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).

OVERVIEW

Multiple operator- and patient-related factors have been identified that can decrease the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs), including scan extension. However, the decision criteria for selecting scan extension for fabricating tooth- and implant-supported restorations is unclear. Based on the extension of the intraoral digital scans, three types of scans can be defined: half-arch (anterior or posterior), extended half-arch, and complete-arch scan. Variables to consider when choosing the scan extension include the number and location of units being restored, as well as the extension and location of edentulous areas. Additionally, the accuracy of the virtual definitive cast and the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured by using IOSs should be differentiated.

CONCLUSIONS

A decision tree for selecting the scan extension is presented. The decision is based on the number and location of units being restored, and the extension and location of edentulous areas. Intraoral scans with reduced scan extension are indicated when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported crowns or short-span fixed prostheses, when the patient does not have more than one missing tooth in the area of the dental arch included in the scan. For the remaining clinical conditions, complete-arch intraoral scans are recommended.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Scan extension is a clinician's decision that should be based on the number and location of units being restored and the extension and location of edentulous areas. Intraoral scans with a reduced scan extension is recommended, when possible.

The impact of digitization and conventional techniques on the fit of fixed partial dentures FPDs: systematic review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The goal behind this study is to answer the question "In tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs), does the digital impression techniques compared to fabrications using conventional impression methods improve the marginal and internal fit?

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of digital technology in the fabrication of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) has accelerated over the past decade. This study is directed at evaluating the marginal and internal fit of FPDs manufactured using digital approaches compared to conventional techniques. The need for updated data has encouraged this review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Grey Database to identify relevant studies. The Modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the risk of bias in in vitro experiments. The key results of this meta-analysis were the standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each main variance, marginal fit, and internal fit between the digital and conventional techniques. Additional analyses were performed to assess the significance of three subgroup parameters: method of digitalization, cement spacer thickness, and span length, and their influence on the fit of the FPDs.

RESULTS

Based on predefined criteria, of the seven articles included in this systematic review, only five were selected for the quantitative data analysis. The marginal fit results were (P = 0.06; SMD: -1.88; 95% CI: - 3.88, 0.11) (P > 0.05) and the internal fit results were (P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: - 1.49, - 0.10) (P < 0.05). Regarding the subgroup analyses, the method of digitalization subgroup results were (P = 0.35; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: - 3.89, 0.11) and (P = 0.80; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: - 1.49, - 0.11) for marginal and internal fit, respectively. The span length results were (P = 0.10; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: - 3.89, 0.11) for marginal fit and (P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: - 1.49, - 0.11) for internal fit. The cement spacer thickness (P = 0.01; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: - 3.89, 0.11) and (P = 0.04; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: - 1.49, - 0.11) for marginal and internal fit, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tooth-retained fixed partial dentures FPDs produced by digital scanning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems can significantly enhance the internal fit compared with those manufactured by traditional methods. Intraoral scanners can replace conventional impressions for the fabrication of FPDs because they minimize the operating time and reduce patient pain. Further clinical studies are required to obtain more conclusive results.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42021261397.

Accuracy of Computerized Optical Impression Making in Fabrication of Removable Dentures for Partially Edentulous Jaws: An In Vivo Feasibility Study

The use of computerized optical impression making (COIM) for the fabrication of removable dentures for partially edentulous jaws is a rising trend in dental prosthetics. However, the accuracy of this method compared with that of traditional impression-making techniques remains uncertain. We therefore decided to evaluate the accuracy of COIM in the context of partially edentulous jaws in an in vivo setting. Twelve partially edentulous patients with different Kennedy classes underwent both a conventional impression (CI) and a computerized optical impression (COI) procedure. The CI was then digitized and compared with the COI data using 3D analysis software. Four different comparison situations were assessed: Whole Jaw (WJ), Mucosa with Residual Teeth (M_RT), Isolated Mucosa (IM), and Isolated Abutment Teeth (AT). Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences by quantifying the deviation values between the CIs and COIs. The mean deviations between the COIs and CIs varied significantly across the different comparison situations, with mucosal areas showing higher deviations than dental hard tissue. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the maxilla and mandible. Although COIM offers a no-pressure impression method that captures surfaces without irritation, it was found to capture mucosa less accurately than dental hard tissue. This discrepancy can likely be attributed to software algorithms that automatically filter out mobile tissues. Clinically, these findings suggest that caution is required when using COIM for prosthetics involving mucosal tissues as deviations could compromise the fit and longevity of the prosthetic appliance. Further research is warranted to assess the clinical relevance of these deviations.

The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners

PURPOSE

To measure the effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures (super-coarse grit, fine grit, and air-particle abrasion) and immediate dentin sealing (IDS) on the scanning accuracy of 4 intraoral scanners (IOSs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A tooth preparation for a full-coverage restoration was performed on an extracted mandibular molar using super-coarse diamond burs. Four groups were created depending on the tooth preparation finishing procedure: super-coarse grit (bur with a grit size of 150 µm) (SCG group), fine grit (bur with a grit size of 30 µm) (FG), air-particle abrasion with 27-µm aluminum oxide particles (APA group), and IDS (IDS group). Each group was divided into 5 subgroups according to the scanning system used to digitize the tooth preparation: laboratory scanner (control subgroup) (T710; Medit), Trios 4 (Trios subgroup), CS 3800 (CS subgroup), i700 wireless (i700 subgroup), and iTero Element 5D Plus (iTero subgroup) (n=20). For each subgroup, the control file was aligned with each experimental scan using the best-fit algorithm and an engineering program (Geomagic Control X). The discrepancy between the control and experimental files of each subgroup was computed by measuring the root mean square (RMS) error. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (α=.05).

RESULTS

Tooth preparation finishing procedures (P<.001) and the IOS assessed (P<.001) were significant predictors of the trueness and precision values obtained. The highest trueness and precision values were measured in the APA group, while the IDS group had the lowest trueness and precision. Additionally, the i700 subgroup obtained the highest trueness and precision values, while the CS and Trios subgroups had the lowest trueness and precision values.

CONCLUSIONS

The different tooth preparations finishing procedures tested influenced on the scanning accuracy of the 4 IOSs considered. The air-particle abrasion procedure obtained the best accuracy values. The trueness discrepancies measured among all the subgroups was 19µm and the precision discrepancies measured among all the subgroups was 4.69 µm.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The tooth preparation finishing procedure used can reduce the intraoral scanning accuracy of any of the intraoral scanners tested. The air-particle abrasion finishing procedure might be recommended for maximizing the scanning accuracy of the IOSs tested.

Use of scanning electron microscope to evaluate the marginal fit of protocol bars obtained through benchtop or intraoral digital scanners

Aim: To evaluate the marginal fit of protocol bars milled from digital models obtained by conventional molding followed by bench scanning or digital molding with an intraoral scanner. Methods: Four morse-cone implants and the mini-pillars were installed in a 3D printed mandible model (master model). Digital models of the master model were obtained by (n=10): (Group A - Conventional) conventional (analog) molding of the master model followed by bench scanning or (Group B - Digital) molding of the master model with an intraoral scanner. All-on-four protocol bars were designed and milled from the digital models for both groups and screwed into the master model. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images from the distal, central, and mesial regions of each implant were obtained and the implant-protocol bar marginal fit was measured in an image software (Image J). The mean misfit of each region was analyzed by two-factor ANOVA, Tukey test, and Student’s t-test (0,05 = 0.05). Results: The digital approach (B) showed higher misadaptation than the conventional approach (A, p < 0.05), regardless of the region evaluated. In group A, the central region showed higher maladjustment than the mesial region (p<0.05), however, there were no differences among regions of group B (p>0.05). Conclusion: The conventional method of acquiring digital models using the bench scanner produced bars for the All-On-Four protocol with better marginal fit than the digital models obtained with an intraoral scanner.

Factors Affecting Trueness of Intraoral Scans: An Update

Background: Intraoral scanning (IOS) technologies have been constantly developed and improved. This systematic review aimed at assessing studies in the recent literature describing factors that influence the trueness of intraoral scans. Methods: Comparative in vitro and in vivo (i.e., interventional and observational) studies that quantitatively assessed the trueness of intraoral scans and that identified factors significantly affecting IOS trueness values were considered eligible for inclusion. The PUBMED and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published in the last two years (from February 2020 to February 2022). Data assessment and extraction were performed according to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. Results: The present search strategy yielded 13 publications. An initial screening of the publications was performed using abstracts and key words, and after application of exclusion criteria, a total of nine studies were finally identified as eligible to be discussed. Several factors significantly affecting IOS were identified. Conclusions: Studies using current IOS technologies revealed that the device, scanning distance, operator experience, rescanning and post-processing scans, conditions of the preparations and presence of adjacent teeth are factors significantly affecting IOS trueness.

In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study compared the dimensional accuracy of conventional impressions (CI) with that of digital impressions (DI) in a partially edentulous maxilla. DIs were made by two intraoral scanners, Omnicam (OC) and Primescan (PS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CI and both intraoral scanners were used to take 30 impressions of two identical reference models. CIs were poured with type 4 gypsum and the saw-cut models were digitized. The reference models simulated a maxilla with six prepared teeth that accommodated a cross-arch fixed partial denture. Center points of five precision balls and center points at the margin level of each prepared tooth were used to detect changes in dimensions and tooth axis between the reference model and the scans.

RESULTS

For DI, the largest deviations (176 µm for OC and 122 µm for PS) occurred over the cross-arch. For CI, the largest deviation (118 µm) occurred over the anterior segment. For shorter distances up to a quadrant, DI was superior to CI. For longer scan distances, DI was comparable (2 sextant and anterior segment) or inferior (cross-arch) to CI. Vertical and tooth axis deviations were significantly smaller for CI than for DI (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The impression method affected the impression accuracy of a partially edentulous maxilla with prepared teeth. DI is recommended for scans up to a quadrant. Larger scan volumes are not yet suitable for fabricating a fixed partial denture because of the high scatter of accuracy values.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In contrast to conventional impressions, digital impressions lead to comparable or better results concerning scans up to a quadrant. Consequently, for larger scan volumes, several smaller scans should be performed or, if restoration-related not possible, it is recommended to take conventional impressions.

Digital versus Conventional Workflow in Oral Rehabilitations: Current Status

In recent years, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology has developed along with its applications in dentistry, including several new techniques that are used in oral rehabilitation applications [...]