1
|
Chisholm J, Mandeville H, Adams M, Minard-Collin V, Rogers T, Kelsey A, Shipley J, van Rijn RR, de Vries I, van Ewijk R, de Keizer B, Gatz SA, Casanova M, Hjalgrim LL, Firth C, Wheatley K, Kearns P, Liu W, Kirkham A, Rees H, Bisogno G, Wasti A, Wakeling S, Heenen D, Tweddle DA, Merks JHM, Jenney M. Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FAR-RMS) Clinical Trial: A Report from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:998. [PMID: 38473359 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS) clinical trial is an overarching, multinational study for children and adults with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The trial, developed by the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), incorporates multiple different research questions within a multistage design with a focus on (i) novel regimens for poor prognostic subgroups, (ii) optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy, and (iii) optimal use of radiotherapy for local control and widespread metastatic disease. Additional sub-studies focusing on biological risk stratification, use of imaging modalities, including [18F]FDG PET-CT and diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI) as prognostic markers, and impact of therapy on quality of life are described. This paper forms part of a Special Issue on rhabdomyosarcoma and outlines the study background, rationale for randomisations and sub-studies, design, and plans for utilisation and dissemination of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Chisholm
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Henry Mandeville
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
| | | | | | - Timothy Rogers
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Anna Kelsey
- Department of Paediatric Histopathology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Janet Shipley
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Rick R van Rijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roelof van Ewijk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne A Gatz
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | | | | | - Charlotte Firth
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Wenyu Liu
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Amanda Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Helen Rees
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Ajla Wasti
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | | | | | - Deborah A Tweddle
- Vivo Biobank, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Johannes H M Merks
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vennarini S, Colombo F, Mirandola A, Chiaravalli S, Orlandi E, Massimino M, Casanova M, Ferrari A. Clinical Insight on Proton Therapy for Paediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:1125-1139. [PMID: 37842128 PMCID: PMC10576457 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s362664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper offers an insight into the use of Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) in paediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature, investigating comparative photon-proton dosimetry, outcome, and toxicity. In the complex and multimodal scenario of the treatment of RMS, clear evidence of the therapeutic superiority of PBT compared to other modern photon techniques has not yet been demonstrated; however, PBT can be considered an excellent treatment option, in particular for young children and patients with specific primary sites, such as the head and neck area (and especially the parameningeal regions), genito-urinary, pelvic, and paravertebral regions. The unique depth-dose characteristics of protons can be exploited to achieve significant reductions in normal tissue doses and may allow an escalation of tumour doses and greater sparing of normal tissues, thus potentially improving local control while at the same time reducing toxicity and improving quality of life. However, access of children with RMS (and more in general with solid tumors) to PBT remains a challenge, due to the limited number of available proton therapy installations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Vennarini
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Colombo
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinsson U, Svärd AM, Witt Nyström P, Embring A, Asklid A, Agrup M, Haugen H, Fröjd C, Engellau J, Nilsson MP, Isacsson U, Kristensen I, Blomstrand M. Complications after proton radiotherapy in children, focusing on severe late complications. A complete Swedish cohort 2008-2019. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1348-1356. [PMID: 37768736 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2260946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (RT) is an attractive tool to deliver local therapy with minimal dose to uninvolved tissue, however, not suitable for all patients. The aim was to explore complications, especially severe late complications (grades 3-4), following proton RT delivered to a complete Swedish cohort of paediatric patients aged <18 years treated 2008-2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data was downloaded from a national registry. Complications with a possible causation with RT are reported. Proton treatments until July 2015 was performed with a fixed horizontal 172 MeV beam (The Svedberg Laboratory (TSL), Uppsala) in a sitting position and thereafter with gantry-based pencil-beam scanning technique (Skandion Clinic, Uppsala) in a supine position. RESULTS 219 courses of proton RT (77 at TSL and 142 at Skandion) were delivered to 212 patients (mean age 9.2 years) with various tumour types (CNS tumours 58%, sarcomas 26%, germ cell tumours 7%). Twenty-five patients had severe acute complications (skin, mucous membrane, pharynx/oesophagus, larynx, upper gastrointestinal canal, lower gastrointestinal canal, eyes, ears). Fifteen patients had severe late complications; with increased proportion over time: 4% at 1-year follow-up (FU), 5% at 3-year, 11% at 5-year. Organs affected were skin (1 patient), subcutaneous tissue (4), salivary glands (1), upper GI (1), bone (7), joints (2), CNS (2), PNS (1), eyes (1) and ears (5). Twenty-one of the 28 patients with 10-year FU had at least one late complication grades 1-4 and fourteen of them had more than one (2-5 each). CONCLUSION The most important result of our study is the relatively low proportion of severe late complications, comparable with other proton studies on various tumours. Furthermore, the numbers of late complications are lower than our own data set on a mixed population of photon and proton treated paediatric patients, assuring the safety of using proton therapy also in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulla Martinsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna-Maja Svärd
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden
| | - Petra Witt Nyström
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Embring
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Asklid
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Måns Agrup
- Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hedda Haugen
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotta Fröjd
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin P Nilsson
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ulf Isacsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Malin Blomstrand
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schenck L, Bäumer C, Ross B, Schäfer G, Stember N, Thomas H, Stieglitz S, Timmermann B. Development of a smartphone virtual reality game to support the radiation therapy of children and adolescents in proton centers. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1163022. [PMID: 37408981 PMCID: PMC10319066 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1163022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction For most patients, cancer therapy with radiation is a new experience coming with many unknown challenges. This can be stressful, particularly for children and adolescents. With the aim of reducing this stress and anxiety, a virtual-reality (VR) game, which can be used by patients prior to treatment, was developed and evaluated in a proton therapy center. Methods The specifications were derived from literature and from interviews with medical staff and patients. The gantry including the sound of its moving components and the sound of the interlock and safety system were identified as the main features relevant for preparation of a radiation course. Potential implementation difficulties were identified in a literature study and regarded in the design. Within the VR game, patients could interact with modeled equipment of the treatment room and hear the reportedly stress-inducing sounds in a stress-free environment prior to the treatment. The VR game was evaluated in a second series of interviews with patients. Results and Discussion This exploratory study demonstrated the specification, implementation and safe application of a VR game dedicated to young proton therapy patients. Initial anecdotal evidence suggested that the VR gaming experience was well received and found to be helpful when preparing young patients for radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Schenck
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Björn Ross
- Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gabriele Schäfer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nicole Stember
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Heike Thomas
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Stieglitz
- Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:31. [PMID: 36805784 PMCID: PMC9942395 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02223-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS We searched for articles using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 22, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS We got 675 candidate articles, of which 11 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 544 RMS patients who received PBT. The local control (LC) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.01), 93% (95% CI 0.86-1.00), 78% (95% CI 0.71-0.85), 85% (95% CI 0.78-0.92), and 84% (95% CI 0.74-0.95), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 82% (95% CI 0.72-0.92), 73% (95% CI 0.61-0.84), 63% (95% CI 0.47-0.79), 64% (95% CI 0.54-0.74), and 76% (95% CI 0.59-0.94), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 93% (95% CI 0.86-1.00), 85% (95% CI 0.76-0.95), 80% (95% CI 0.63-0.96), 71% (95% CI 0.62-0.80), and 82% (95% CI 0.71-0.94), respectively. Acute and late toxicities were mainly grades 1 to 2 in all studies. CONCLUSION As an advantageous RT technique, PBT is an emerging option for patients with RMS, particularly children and adolescents patients. The data showed that PBT is a feasible, safe, and effective modality for RMS, showing promising LC, OS, PFS, and lower acute and late toxicities. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022329154.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hwang E, Gaito S, France A, Crellin AM, Thwaites DI, Ahern V, Indelicato D, Timmermann B, Smith E. Outcomes of Patients Treated in the UK Proton Overseas Programme: Non-central Nervous System Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:292-300. [PMID: 36813694 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The UK Proton Overseas Programme (POP) was launched in 2008. The Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit (PCOU) warehouses a centralised registry for collection, curation and analysis of all outcomes data for all National Health Service-funded UK patients referred and treated abroad with proton beam therapy (PBT) via the POP. Outcomes are reported and analysed here for patients diagnosed with non-central nervous system tumours treated from 2008 to September 2020 via the POP. MATERIALS AND METHODS All non-central nervous system tumour files for treatments as of 30 September 2020 were interrogated for follow-up information, and type (following CTCAE v4) and time of onset of any late (>90 days post-PBT completion) grade 3-5 toxicities. RESULTS Four hundred and ninety-five patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (0-9.3 years). The median age was 11 years (0-69 years). 70.3% of patients were paediatric (<16 years). Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma were the most common diagnoses (42.6% and 34.1%). 51.3% of treated patients were for head and neck (H&N) tumours. At last known follow-up, 86.1% of all patients were alive, with a 2-year survival rate of 88.3% and 2-year local control of 90.3%. Mortality and local control were worse for adults (≥25 years) than for the younger groups. The grade 3 toxicity rate was 12.6%, with a median onset of 2.3 years. Most were in the H&N region in paediatric patients with RMS. Cataracts (30.5%) were the most common, then musculoskeletal deformity (10.1%) and premature menopause (10.1%). Three paediatric patients (1-3 years at treatment) experienced secondary malignancy. Seven grade 4 toxicities occurred (1.6%), all in the H&N region and most in paediatric patients with RMS. Six related to eyes (cataracts, retinopathy, scleral disorder) or ears (hearing impairment). CONCLUSIONS This study is the largest to date for RMS and Ewing sarcoma, undergoing multimodality therapy including PBT. It demonstrates good local control, survival and acceptable toxicity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Hwang
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - S Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - A France
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A M Crellin
- NHS England National Clinical Lead Proton Beam Therapy, UK
| | - D I Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's Hospital and School of Medicine, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
| | - V Ahern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Indelicato
- University of Florida Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - B Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, West German Cancer Centre, German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany
| | - E Smith
- The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morfouace M, Hol MLF, Schoot RA, Slater O, Indelicato DJ, Kolb F, Smeele LE, Merks JHM, Rae C, Maurice-Stam H, Klassen AF, Grootenhuis MA. Patient-reported outcomes in childhood head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma survivors and their relation to physician-graded adverse events-A multicenter study using the FACE-Q Craniofacial module. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4739-4750. [PMID: 36208014 PMCID: PMC9972026 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adverse events (AE) of treatment are prevalent and diverse in head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) survivors. These AEs are often reported by physicians; however, patients' perceptions of specific AE are not well known. In this study, we explored patient-reported outcomes measuring appearance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and facial function in HNRMS survivors. Second, we assess the relationship between physician grading of AE and patient reporting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Survivors of pediatric HNRMS, diagnosed between 1993 and 2017, who were at least 2 years after completing treatment were invited to an outpatient clinic as part of a multicenter cross-sectional cohort study. At the outpatient clinics, survivors aged ≥8 years filled out the FACE-Q Craniofacial module; a patient-reported outcome instrument measuring issues specific to patients with facial differences. AE were systematically assessed by a multidisciplinary team based on the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events system. RESULTS Seventy-seven survivors with a median age of 16 years (range 8-43) and median follow-up of 10 years (range 2-42) completed the questionnaire and were screened for AEs. Patient-reported outcomes varied widely between survivors. Many survivors reported negative consequences: 82% on appearance items, 81% on HRQOL items, and 38% on facial function items. There was a weak correlation between physician-scored AEs and the majority of patient-reported outcomes specific for those AEs. CONCLUSIONS Physician-graded AEs are not sufficient to provide tailored care for HNMRS survivors. Findings from this study highlight the importance of incorporating patient-reported outcome measures in survivorship follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michèle Morfouace
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marinka L F Hol
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Princess Maxima Center Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Cancer, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Reineke A Schoot
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Slater
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Frédéric Kolb
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ludwig E Smeele
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Princess Maxima Center Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H M Merks
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlene Rae
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Heleen Maurice-Stam
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne F Klassen
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Martha A Grootenhuis
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Gorp M, Grootenhuis MA, Darlington AS, Wakeling S, Jenney M, Merks JHM, Hjalgrim LL, Adams M. Patient Reported Outcomes and Measures in Children with Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020420. [PMID: 36672371 PMCID: PMC9856469 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
In addition to optimising survival of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), more attention is now focused on improving their quality of life (QOL) and reducing symptoms during treatment, palliative care or into long-term survivorship. QOL and ongoing symptoms related to the disease and its treatment are outcomes that should ideally be patient-reported (patient-reported outcomes, PROs) and can be assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). This commentary aims to encourage PRO and PROM use in RMS by informing professionals in the field of available PROMs for utilisation in paediatric RMS and provide considerations for future use in research and clinical practice. Despite the importance of using PROMs in research and practice, PROMs have been reported scarcely in paediatric RMS literature so far. Available literature suggests lower QOL of children with RMS compared to general populations and occurrence of disease-specific symptoms, but a lack of an RMS-specific PROM. Ongoing developments in the field include the development of PROMs targeted at children with RMS specifically and expansion of PROM evaluation within clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes van Gorp
- Princes Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sara Wakeling
- Founder, Alice’s Arc, Rhabdomyosarcoma Children’s Cancer Charity, London E4 7RW, UK
| | | | | | - Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Madeleine Adams
- Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Phillips RS, Vaarwerk B, Morgan JE. Using Evidence-Based Medicine to Support Clinical Decision-Making in RMS. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010066. [PMID: 36612064 PMCID: PMC9817945 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The foundations of evidence-based practice are the triad of patient values and preferences, healthcare professional experience, and best available evidence, used together to inform clinical decision-making. Within the field of rhabdomyosarcoma, collaborative groups such as the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group (EpSSG) have worked to develop evidence to support this process. We have explored many of the key research developments within this review, including patient and public involvement, decision-making research, research into areas other than drug development, core outcome sets, reporting and dissemination of research, evidence synthesis, guideline development and clinical decision rules, research of research methodologies, and supporting research in RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S. Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
| | - Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatrics, Amsterdam UMC—Emma Children’s Hospital, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica E. Morgan
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Can We Compare the Health-Related Quality of Life of Childhood Cancer Survivors Following Photon and Proton Radiation Therapy? A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163937. [PMID: 36010929 PMCID: PMC9405962 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton radiation therapy is a radiation oncology innovation expected to produce superior health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for children with cancer, compared to conventional photon radiation therapy. The review aim is to identify if clinical evidence exists to support the anticipated HRQoL improvements for children receiving proton radiation therapy. HRQoL outcomes of 1986 childhood cancer survivors are described. There is insufficient quality evidence to compare HRQoL outcomes between proton and photon radiation therapy. Therefore, the current state of the literature does not conclude that proton radiation therapy produces superior HRQoL outcomes for childhood cancer survivors. Despite recommendations, no evidence of routine HRQoL assessment using patient-reported outcomes in paediatric radiation oncology are identified. Further rigorous collection and reporting of HRQoL data is essential to improve patient outcomes, and to adequately compare HRQoL between radiation therapy modalities. Abstract Paediatric cancer patients have a risk of late side effects after curative treatment. Proton radiation therapy (PRT) has the potential to reduce the incidence and severity of toxicities produced by conventional photon radiation therapy (XRT), which may improve the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children. This systematic review aimed to identify the evidence of HRQoL outcomes in childhood cancer survivors following XRT and PRT. Medline, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched. Thirty studies were analysed, which described outcomes of 1986 childhood cancer survivors. Most studies (n = 24) described outcomes for children with a central nervous system (CNS) tumour, four studies reported outcomes for children with a non-CNS tumour, and two studies combined CNS and non-CNS diagnoses within a single cohort. No studies analysed routine HRQoL collection during paediatric radiation oncology clinical practice. There is insufficient quality evidence to compare HRQoL outcomes between XRT and PRT. Therefore, the current state of the literature does not conclude that PRT produces superior HRQoL outcomes for childhood cancer survivors. Standardised clinical implementation of HRQoL assessment using patient-reported outcomes is recommended to contribute to improvements in clinical care whilst assisting the progression of knowledge comparing XRT and PRT.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bäumer C, Frakulli R, Kohl J, Nagaraja S, Steinmeier T, Worawongsakul R, Timmermann B. Adaptive Proton Therapy of Pediatric Head and Neck Cases Using MRI-Based Synthetic CTs: Initial Experience of the Prospective KiAPT Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112616. [PMID: 35681594 PMCID: PMC9179385 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Interfractional anatomical changes might affect the outcome of proton therapy (PT). We aimed to prospectively evaluate the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based adaptive PT for children with tumors of the head and neck and base of skull. METHODS MRI verification images were acquired at half of the treatment course. A synthetic computed tomography (CT) image was created using this MRI and a deformable image registration (DIR) to the reference MRI. The methodology was verified with in-silico phantoms and validated using a clinical case with a shrinking cystic hygroma on the basis of dosimetric quantities of contoured structures. The dose distributions on the verification X-ray CT and on the synthetic CT were compared with a gamma-index test using global 2 mm/2% criteria. RESULTS Regarding the clinical validation case, the gamma-index pass rate was 98.3%. Eleven patients were included in the clinical study. The most common diagnosis was rhabdomyosarcoma (73%). Craniofacial tumor site was predominant in 64% of patients, followed by base of skull (18%). For one individual case the synthetic CT showed an increase in the median D2 and Dmax dose on the spinal cord from 20.5 GyRBE to 24.8 GyRBE and 14.7 GyRBE to 25.1 GyRBE, respectively. Otherwise, doses received by OARs remained relatively stable. Similarly, the target volume coverage seen by D95% and V95% remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS The method of transferring anatomical changes from MRIs to a synthetic CTs was successfully implemented and validated with simple, commonly available tools. In the frame of our early results on a small cohort, no clinical relevant deterioration for neither PTV coverage nor an increased dose burden to OARs occurred. However, the study will be continued to identify a pediatric patient cohort, which benefits from adaptive treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics, Technische Universität Dortmund, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Rezarta Frakulli
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jessica Kohl
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Sindhu Nagaraja
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Theresa Steinmeier
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Rasin Worawongsakul
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Nakhon 73170, Thailand
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawai A, Araki N, Ae K, Akiyama T, Ozaki T, Kawano H, Kunisada T, Sumi M, Takahashi S, Tanaka K, Tsukushi S, Naka N, Nishida Y, Miyachi M, Yamamoto N, Yoshida A, Yonemoto T, Yoshida M, Iwata S. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of soft tissue tumors 2020 - Secondary publication. J Orthop Sci 2022; 27:533-550. [PMID: 35339316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND These clinical practice guidelines are intended to provide recommendations based on the best evidence obtained to date on key issues in clinical practice to improve the prognosis, diagnostic and therapeutic processes for patients with soft tissue tumors. METHODS The Guidelines Development Committee and Systematic Review Committee were composed of a multidisciplinary team of specialists who play an important role in soft tissue tumor care. Clinical questions (CQs) were determined by choosing key decision-making points based on Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors. The guidelines were developed according to the "Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014" and "Minds Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2017." Recommendation strength was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations were decided based on agreement by 70% or more voters. RESULTS Twenty-two CQs were chosen by the Guidelines Development Committee. The Systematic Review Committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ, a clinical value judgment was added by experts, and the text of each recommendation was determined. CONCLUSION We established 22 CQs and recommendations for key decision-making points in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors according to the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline development methods. We hope that these guidelines will assist the decision-making of all medical staff engaged in the treatment and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, and eventually lead to improved soft tissue tumor care in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Nobuhito Araki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ashiya Municipal Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Japan
| | - Toru Akiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Ozaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Kawano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kunisada
- Department of Medical Materials for Musculoskeletal Reconstruction, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Japan
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Japan
| | | | - Norifumi Naka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NachiKatsuura Town Onsen Hospital, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Japan
| | - Akihiko Yoshida
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Yoshida
- International University of Health and Welfare, Japan Council for Quality Health Care, Japan
| | - Shintaro Iwata
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
J F, A S, V E, F P, P M, B T, Sw W. New aspects and innovations in the local treatment of renal and urogenital pediatric tumors. Semin Pediatr Surg 2021; 30:151081. [PMID: 34412882 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Local treatment plays a key role for patients' outcome in tumors of the urogenital tract in children. Despite a great variety of different etiologies, the specific localization of pediatric urogenital tumors renders several characteristic demands to the treating personnel. Surgery and radiotherapy are the main elements of local treatment in this group of neoplasms. Numerous new guidelines and innovative technical developments of surgery and radiotherapy have recently been integrated into treatment concepts for pediatric urogenital tumors. Due to the broadness of the field it is not possible to give a full overview over all aspects. Therefore, this article highlights the most important innovations and new guidelines of surgery and radiotherapy of pediatric urogenital tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuchs J
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children´s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Schmidt A
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children´s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ellerkamp V
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children´s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paulsen F
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Melchior P
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - Timmermann B
- Department of Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Warmann Sw
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children´s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Buszek SM, Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Harrison DJ, Okcu MF, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Paulino AC. Disease Control and Patterns of Failure After Proton Beam Therapy for Rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:718-725. [PMID: 33516439 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are treated with multimodal therapy, often with radiation therapy (RT) as part of local therapy. We report on the efficacy and patterns of failure after proton beam therapy (PBT) for RMS. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 2006 and February 2017, patients with RMS were enrolled in a prospective institutional review board-approved registry protocol for pediatric patients undergoing PBT. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment related outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Ninety-four RMS patients were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (CT) and PBT. The majority of patients had head and neck (49%) and genitourinary (30%) primaries. Median tumor size was 4.1 cm (range, 1.0-16.5 cm); 33 patients (35%) had primary tumors >5 cm. Median cyclophosphamide equivalent dose was 14.4 g/m2 (range, 0-30.8 g/m2). Median time from CT initiation to RT initiation was 13 weeks (range, 1-58 weeks). With median follow-up of 4 years, 4-year overall survival (OS) was 71%, and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63%. Thirty patients (32%) experienced relapse (13% with local failure [LF]). Four-year local control (LC) was 85% overall; 4-year LC rates were 100% for low-risk, 85% for intermediate-risk, and 55% for high-risk patients (P = .02). Tumor size predicted LC (P = .007), with 7% versus 33% LF rate by tumor size (≤5 cm vs >5 cm). Delayed RT delivery (≥13 weeks from initiation of CT) predicted worse LC (P = .01). Increased tumor size predicted both inferior PFS (P = .02) and OS (P = .01). Delayed RT delivery predicted both inferior PFS (P = .04) and OS (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS PBT provides LC comparable to prior studies using photon RT. Inferior LC, PFS, and OS rates were observed for patients with larger tumors and those treated with delayed RT. This finding supports ongoing prospective efforts to dose-escalate treatment of tumors >5 cm; however, these data call into question the optimal timing of local therapy, particularly for patients treated with reduced-dose cyclophosphamide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Douglas J Harrison
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spiotto MT, McGovern SL, Gunn GB, Grosshans D, McAleer MF, Frank SJ, Paulino AC. Proton Radiotherapy to Reduce Late Complications in Childhood Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:155-167. [PMID: 34285943 PMCID: PMC8270100 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00069.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In most childhood head and neck cancers, radiotherapy is an essential component of treatment; however, it can be associated with problematic long-term complications. Proton beam therapy is accepted as a preferred radiation modality in pediatric cancers to minimize the late radiation side effects. Given that childhood cancers are a rare and heterogeneous disease, the support for proton therapy comes from risk modeling and a limited number of cohort series. Here, we discuss the role of proton radiotherapy in pediatric head and neck cancers with a focus on reducing radiation toxicities. First, we compare the efficacy and expected toxicities in proton and photon radiotherapy for childhood cancers. Second, we review the benefit of proton radiotherapy in reducing acute and late radiation toxicities, including risks for secondary cancers, craniofacial development, vision, and cognition. Finally, we review the cost effectiveness for proton radiotherapy in pediatric head and neck cancers. This review highlights the benefits of particle radiotherapy for pediatric head and neck cancers to improve the quality of life in cancer survivors, to reduce radiation morbidities, and to maximize efficient health care use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Spiotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Komatsu S, Okamoto M, Shiba S, Kaminuma T, Okazaki S, Kiyohara H, Yanagawa T, Nakano T, Ohno T. Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes after Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Inoperable Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112591. [PMID: 34070569 PMCID: PMC8199366 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes in patients with inoperable bone and soft tissue sarcoma treated with definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) were prospectively investigated. CIRT showed favorable clinical efficacy and safety, maintaining the physical component of QOL and functional outcomes, and improving the mental component of QOL. The physical component of QOL was positively correlated with functional outcomes. Poor performance status at diagnosis and female gender were independent predictors of the physical component of QOL and functional outcomes after CIRT. Abstract Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) represents a definitive treatment for inoperable bone and soft tissue sarcoma (BSTS). This prospective study analyzed 61 patients with inoperable BSTS who were treated with CIRT to evaluate QOL, functional outcomes, and predictive factors in patients with inoperable BSTS treated with definitive CIRT. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and the Short Form (SF)-8 questionnaire were completed before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after CIRT. The median follow-up period was 38 months. The main site of primary disease was the pelvis (70.5%), and the most common pathologic diagnosis was chordoma (45.9%). The 3-year overall survival and local control rates were 87.8% and 83.8%, respectively. The MSTS score and physical component score (PCS) of SF-8 did not change significantly between the baseline and subsequent values. The mental component score of SF-8 significantly improved after CIRT. Multivariate analysis showed that the normalized MSTS and normalized PCS of SF-8 at the final follow-up were significantly affected by performance status at diagnosis and sex. CIRT showed clinical efficacy, preserving the physical component of QOL and functional outcomes and improving the mental component of QOL, suggesting its potential value for the treatment of patients with inoperable BSTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuichiro Komatsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
| | - Masahiko Okamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-283-22-5222
| | - Shintaro Shiba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takuya Kaminuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Shohei Okazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kiyohara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, 389-1, Asakura-machi, Maebashi 371-0811, Gunma, Japan;
| | - Takashi Yanagawa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan;
| | - Takashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi 363-8555, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (S.K.); (S.S.); (T.K.); (S.O.); (T.N.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-15, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Recent clinical trials have revealed several unanticipated complexities in the optimal management of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Improvement in outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk RMS over the past several decades led to the design of clinical trials aimed at reducing acute and late toxicity from extirpative surgeries, conventional radiotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Results from these studies are mixed and have illuminated areas where historical risk stratification strategies need refining. Although radiotherapy has now become the standard for local control for most patients with genitourinary RMS, recent studies are demonstrating that there may be opportunities to minimize radiation toxicity while maintaining acceptable failure-free survival. A reduction in cyclophosphamide exposure may benefit select low-risk RMS patients but recent results illustrate that decreasing therapy intensity for most genitourinary RMS patients will require careful consideration in future prospective trials. Finally, recent studies highlight differences in perspective between European and North American investigators regarding the optimal balance of increased local failure rates but less toxicity versus improved event-free survival at a cost of higher toxicity. This review focuses on the results from the most recent RMS clinical trials and discusses their implications for the management of pediatric genitourinary RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Deel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schaefer IM, Hong K, Kalbasi A. How Technology Is Improving the Multidisciplinary Care of Sarcoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:445-462. [PMID: 32421448 PMCID: PMC8009691 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_280729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare tumors but comprise a wide histologic spectrum. Advances in technology have emerged to address the biologic complexity and challenging diagnosis and treatment of this disease. The diagnostic approach to sarcomas has historically been based on morphologic features, but technologic advances in immunohistochemistry and cytogenetic/molecular testing have transformed the interdisciplinary work-up of mesenchymal neoplasms in recent years. On the therapeutic side, technologic advances in the delivery of radiation have made it a linchpin in the treatment of localized and oligometastatic sarcoma. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the pathologic diagnosis of sarcomas and discuss select sarcoma types that illustrate how newly discovered diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers have refined existing classification schemes and substantially shaped our diagnostic approach. Such examples include conventional and epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), emerging entities in the group of round cell sarcomas, and other mesenchymal neoplasms with distinct cytogenetic aberrations. Recent advances in radiation oncology, including intensity-modulated, stereotactic, MRI-guided, and proton radiotherapy (RT), will be reviewed in the context of neoadjuvant or adjuvant localized soft-tissue sarcoma and oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. Innovations in translational research are expected to be introduced into clinical practice over the next few years and will likely continue to affect the rapidly evolving field of sarcoma diagnostics and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga-Marie Schaefer
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kelvin Hong
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anusha Kalbasi
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to describe current advances in pediatric precision therapy through innovations in technology and engineering. A multimodal approach of chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation therapy has improved survival outcomes for pediatric cancer but with significant early and late toxicities. The pediatric population is particularly vulnerable given their age during treatment. Advances in precision interventions discussed include image guidance, ablation techniques, radiation therapy and novel drug delivery mechanisms that offer the potential for more targeted approach approaches with improved efficacy while limiting acute and late toxicities. RECENT FINDINGS Image-guidance provides improved treatment planning, real time monitoring and targeting when combined with ablative techniques and radiation therapy. Advances in drug delivery including radioisotopes, nanoparticles and antibody drug conjugates have shown benefit in adult malignancies with increasing use in pediatrics. These therapies alone and combined may lead to augmented local antitumor effect while sparing systemic exposure and potentially limiting early and late toxicities. SUMMARY Pediatric cancer medicine often requires a multimodal approach, each with early and late toxicities. Precision interventions and therapies offer promise for more targeted approaches in treating pediatric malignancies and require further investigation to determine long-term benefit.
Collapse
|
22
|
Sardaro A, Carbonara R, Petruzzelli MF, Turi B, Moschetta M, Scardapane A, Stabile Ianora AA. Proton therapy in the most common pediatric non-central nervous system malignancies: an overview of clinical and dosimetric outcomes. Ital J Pediatr 2019; 45:170. [PMID: 31881905 PMCID: PMC6935184 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-019-0763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy represents an important approach in the therapeutic management of children and adolescents with malignant tumors and its application with modern techniques – including Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) – is of great interest. In particular, potential radiation-induced injuries and secondary malignancies – also associated to the prolonged life expectancy of patients – are still questions of concern that increase the debate on the usefulness of PBT in pediatric treatments. This paper presents a literary review of current applications of PBT in non-Central Nervous System pediatric tumors (such as retinoblastoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Wilms tumor, bone and soft tissues sarcomas). We specifically reported clinical results achieved with PBT and dosimetric comparisons between PBT and the most common photon-therapy techniques. The analysis emphasizes that PBT minimizes radiation doses to healthy growing organs, suggesting for reduced risks of late side-effects and radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Extended follow up and confirms by prospective clinical trials should support the effectiveness and long-term tolerance of PBT in the considered setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Carbonara
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Maria Fonte Petruzzelli
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Barbara Turi
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Moschetta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Scardapane
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Buszek SM, Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Harrison DJ, Okcu MF, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Paulino AC. Patterns of failure and toxicity profile following proton beam therapy for pediatric bladder and prostate rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27952. [PMID: 31397065 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Bladder and prostate are unfavorable sites for rhabdomyosarcoma (B/P-RMS), and represent a challenging location for radiotherapy. MATERIALS/METHODS Nineteen patients with B/P-RMS were enrolled on a prospective registry protocol (2008-2017) and treated with chemotherapy, proton beam therapy (PBT), and surgical resection (n = 8; 42%). Emphasis was given to treatment technique, disease-related outcomes, and toxicity associated with PBT. RESULTS The majority of patients had bladder RMS (74%) of embryonal histology (95%), Group III (68%), and intermediate-risk disease by Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk stratification (89%). Seven patients (37%) had primary tumors >5 cm in size. All patients were treated according to COG protocols. With a median follow-up of 66.2 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 76%. Four patients (21%) experienced disease relapse, all presenting with local failure. The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 76%. Tumor size predicted LC, with 5-year LC for patients with >5 cm tumors being 43% versus 100% for those with ≤5 cm tumors (P = .006). Univariate analysis demonstrated an effect of tumor size on OS (tumor >5 cm, hazard ratio [HR] 17.7, P = .049) and PFS (HR 17.7, P = .049). Acute grade 2 toxicity was observed in two patients (11%, transient proctitis). Late grade 2+ toxicity was observed in three patients (16%; n = 1 grade 2 skeletal deformity; n = 3 transient grade 2 urinary incontinence; one patient experienced both). CONCLUSIONS PBT for B/P-RMS affords promising disease-related outcomes with an acceptable toxicity profile. Higher local failure rates were observed for larger tumors, supporting dose-escalation components of ongoing RMS clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary F McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Douglas J Harrison
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
A Critical Review of the Impact of Sarcoma on Psychosocial Wellbeing. Sarcoma 2019; 2019:9730867. [PMID: 30911268 PMCID: PMC6397984 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9730867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous reviews of outcomes in specific sarcoma populations suggest patients have poor quality of life. In most of these reviews, there is a predominant focus on physical function rather than psychosocial outcome. The aim of this review was to describe the psychosocial impact of diagnosis and treatment on patients with all types of sarcoma. Methods Searches were conducted through six electronic databases for publications of any study design using a validated patient-reported outcome measure reporting the psychosocial impact in this population. Results Eighty-two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most (65%) were assessed of being of reasonable quality. The most common aspect of psychosocial wellbeing measured was quality of life (80%). Due to the heterogeneity of methods, outcomes, and populations, it was not possible to make definitive conclusions. It seems there is an improvement in the physical aspects of quality of life over time but not in psychosocial function or mental health. There was no change in mental health scores, but patients reported an improvement in adjusting to normal life. There are no differences according to the type of surgery patients receive, and psychosocial outcomes tend to be poorer than the general population. There is no consistency in identifying the factors that predict/influence psychosocial wellbeing. Conclusion The published literature does not provide a clear understanding of the impact of sarcoma diagnosis and treatment on psychosocial wellbeing. Instead, the review demonstrates a need for well-designed studies in this area and a more consistent approach to the measurement of patient-reported outcomes, which include psychosocial domains. Recommendations for future research have been proposed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Harrison DJ, Okcu MF, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Paulino AC. Patterns of failure following proton beam therapy for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:143-150. [PMID: 31005208 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the head and neck (H&N) are treated with multimodal therapy, often with radiotherapy (RT) as definitive local therapy. We report on the patterns of failure following proton beam therapy (PBT) for H&N RMS. METHODS Forty-six H&N RMS patients were enrolled on a prospective registry protocol between 2006 and 2015. All were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (ChT) and PBT. Most patients (25 patients, 54%) had parameningeal tumors, of which 11 (24%) had intracranial extension (ICE). Thirteen patients (28%) had primary tumors greater than 5 cm. Median total cyclophosphamide (CPM) equivalent dose was 13.2 g/m2 (range 0-16.8 g/m2). Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy(RBE) (range 36 Gy[RBE]-50.8 Gy[RBE]). RESULTS With median follow-up of 3.9 years, five-year overall survival was 76%, and five-year progression-free survival was 57%. Seventeen patients (37%) experienced relapse, including 7 with local failure (LF). Five-year local control (LC) was 84%. Tumor size greater than 5 cm predicted increased risk of LF (hazard ratio [HR] 6.49, p = 0.03), as did the presence of ICE at diagnosis (HR 5.21, p = 0.03). Six relapses occurred in patients with ICE; all included a component of central nervous system relapse, with leptomeningeal disease and/or LF with an intracranial component. Delayed RT delivery after week 4 of ChT predicted increased risk of relapse for ICE patients (HR 10.49, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS PBT confers excellent LC, and a favorable late toxicity profile as compared with prior photon RT data. Our observations support ongoing trial efforts to dose-escalate RT for patients with larger tumors. However, these data raise concerns regarding excess failures among patients with ICE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - David R Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Douglas J Harrison
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The advent of proton beam therapy (PBT) has initiated a paradigm shift in the field of pediatric radiation oncology, with increasing promise to alleviate both short-term and long-term toxicities. Given the dramatic rise in proton therapy centers in the United States, a discussion of the quality of evidence supporting its use in pediatric cancers is warranted. RECENT FINDINGS Proton radiotherapy appears to decrease the incidence and severity of late effects with the strongest evidence in pediatric brain tumor cohorts that shows benefits in neurocognitive, hearing, and endocrine outcomes. However, emerging data has shown that more conservative brainstem dose limits with protons compared with photons are required to limit brainstem toxicity; these modified recommendations have been incorporated into national cooperative group studies. Decreased toxicity in tumors outside of the CNS for PBT have also been reported in sarcomas, Hodgkin disease and neuroblastoma. Similarly, QoL outcomes are improved in brain tumor and other cohorts of patients treated with PBT. SUMMARY The collective findings demonstrate improved understanding and refinement of PBT in pediatric cancers. Data on QOL, toxicity and disease outcomes with PBT should continue to be collected and reported in order to understand the full extent of the risks and benefits associated with PBT.
Collapse
|
28
|
Steinmeier T, Schulze Schleithoff S, Timmermann B. Evolving Radiotherapy Techniques in Paediatric Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:142-150. [PMID: 30639254 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Childhood cancer is rare and survival of childhood cancer has increased up to 80% at 5 years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy is an important element of the multimodal treatment concept. However, due to growing tissue, children are particularly sensitive to radiation-related side-effects and the induction of secondary malignancies. However, radiotherapy techniques have continuously progressed. In addition, modern treatment concepts have been improved in order to minimise long-term effects. Today, radiotherapy is used for various tumour types in childhood, such as sarcomas and tumours of the central nervous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS External beam therapy with either photons or protons and brachytherapy are predominantly used for the treatment of childhood tumours. Technical developments and features, as well as clinical outcomes, for several tumour entities are presented. RESULTS The development of radiotherapy techniques, as well as risk-adapted therapy concepts, resulted in promising outcome regarding tumour control, survival and therapy-related side-effects. It is assumed that proton therapy will be increasingly used for treating children in the future. However, more data have to be collected through multi-institutional registries in order to strengthen the evidence. CONCLUSION The development of radiotherapy techniques is beneficial for children in terms of reducing dose exposure. As compared with other modern and highly conformal techniques, particularly proton therapy may achieve high survival rates and tumour control rates while decreasing the risk for side-effects. However, clinical evidence for modern radiotherapy techniques is still limited today. An optimal patient triaging with the selection of the most appropriate radiation technique for each individual patient will be an important goal for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Steinmeier
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - S Schulze Schleithoff
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hu M, Jiang L, Cui X, Zhang J, Yu J. Proton beam therapy for cancer in the era of precision medicine. J Hematol Oncol 2018; 11:136. [PMID: 30541578 PMCID: PMC6290507 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-018-0683-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision radiotherapy, which accurately delivers the dose on a tumor and confers little or no irradiation to the surrounding normal tissue and organs, results in maximum tumor control and decreases the toxicity to the utmost extent. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides superior dose distributions and has a dosimetric advantage over photon beam therapy. Initially, the clinical practice and study of proton beam therapy focused on ocular tumor, skull base, paraspinal tumors (chondrosarcoma and chordoma), and unresectable sarcomas, which responded poorly when treated with photon radiotherapy. Then, it is widely regarded as an ideal mode for reirradiation and pediatrics due to reducing unwanted side effects by lessening the dose to normal tissue. During the past decade, the application of PBT has been rapidly increasing worldwide and gradually expanding for the treatment of various malignancies. However, to date, the role of PBT in clinical settings is still controversial, and there are considerable challenges in its application. We systematically review the latest advances of PBT and the challenges for patient treatment in the era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Man Hu
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Liyang Jiang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Xiangli Cui
- Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Center of Medical Physics and Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Jianguang Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Zibo Wanjie Cancer Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Jinming Yu
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
- Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
La protonthérapie comme modalité d’irradiation dans les sarcomes des os ou cartilage et des tissus mous, état des lieux en 2018. Bull Cancer 2018; 105:830-838. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
31
|
Minard-Colin V, Walterhouse D, Bisogno G, Martelli H, Anderson J, Rodeberg DA, Ferrari A, Jenney M, Wolden S, De Salvo G, Arndt C, Merks JHM, Gallego S, Schwob D, Haie-Meder C, Bergeron C, Stevens MCG, Oberlin O, Hawkins D. Localized vaginal/uterine rhabdomyosarcoma-results of a pooled analysis from four international cooperative groups. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27096. [PMID: 29781567 PMCID: PMC8117251 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaginal/uterine rhabdomyosarcoma (VU RMS) is one of the most favorable RMS sites. To determine the optimal therapy, the experience of four cooperative groups (Children's Oncology Group [COG], International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor Group [MMT], Italian Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group [ICG], and European pediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group [EpSSG]) was analyzed. PROCEDURE From 1981 to 2009, 237 patients were identified. Median age (years) at diagnosis differed by tumor location; it was 1.9 for vagina (n = 160), 2.7 for uterus corpus (n = 26), and 13.5 for uterus cervix (n = 51). Twenty-eight percent of patients received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary therapy (23% COG, 27% MMT, 46% ICG, and 42% EpSSG), with significant differences in the use of brachytherapy between the cooperative groups (23% COG, 76% MMT, 64% ICG, and 88% EpSSG). RESULTS Ten-year event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74% (95% CI, 67-79%) and 92% (95% CI, 88-96%), respectively. In univariate analysis, OS was inferior for patients with uterine RMS and for those with regional lymph node involvement. Although EFS was slightly lower in patients without initial RT (71% without RT vs. 81% with RT; P = 0.08), there was no difference in OS (94% without RT vs. 89% with RT; P = 0.18). Local control using brachytherapy was excellent (93%). Fifty-one (51.5%) of the 99 survivors with known primary therapy and treatment for relapse were cured with chemotherapy with or without conservative surgery. CONCLUSIONS About half of all patients with VU RMS can be cured without systematic RT or radical surgery. When RT is indicated, modalities that limit sequelae should be considered, such as brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Walterhouse
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell
Transplantation, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago,
Illinois
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Division, Padova
University, Padova, Italy
| | - Helene Martelli
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, CHU Bicetre, Le
Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - James Anderson
- Department of Oncology Clinical Research, Merck Research
Laboratories, North Wales, Pennsylvania
| | - David A. Rodeberg
- Department of Surgery, East Carolina University,
Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto
Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Meriel Jenney
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Wales,
Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York City, New York
| | - Gianluca De Salvo
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Istituto
Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy
| | - Carola Arndt
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo
Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Johannes H. M. Merks
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's
Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Soledad Gallego
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hospital Universitari
Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Christophe Bergeron
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Centre
Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Michael C. G. Stevens
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Bristol Royal Hospital
for Children, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Odile Oberlin
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave
Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Douglas Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's
Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Fact, figures and costs. A joint consensus statement from the pediatric subcommittee of PTCOG, PROS and EPTN. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:44-55. [PMID: 29937209 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of childhood cancer, with the primary aim of achieving the highest likelihood of cure with the lowest risk of radiation-induced morbidity. Proton therapy (PT) provides an undisputable advantage by reducing the radiation 'bath' dose delivered to non-target structures/volume while optimally covering the tumor with tumoricidal dose. This treatment modality comes, however, with an additional costs compared to conventional radiotherapy that could put substantial financial pressure to the health care systems with societal implications. In this review we assess the data available to the oncology community of PT delivered to children with cancer, discuss on the urgency to develop high-quality data. Additionally, we look at the advantage of combining systemic agents with protons and look at the cost-effectiveness data published so far.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ludmir EB, Paulino AC, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Huh WW, Okcu MF, Harrell LM, Mahajan A. Regional Nodal Control for Head and Neck Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:169-176. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
34
|
Verma V, Simone CB, Mishra MV. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:4430583. [PMID: 29028221 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As costs of cancer care rise, the importance of documenting value in oncology increases. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) has the potential to reduce toxicities in cancer patients, but is relatively expensive and unproven. Evaluating quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential to establishing PBT's "value" in oncologic therapy. The goal of this systematic review was to assess QOL and PROs in patients treated with PBT. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic searches were conducted. The PubMed search engine was the primary data source, along with publications found from references of selected articles, and articles known to the authors published through 2017. Seventeen original investigations were found to have sufficient focus and relevance to be incorporated into the systematic review. Results Studies of skull base (n = 1), brain (n = 1), head/neck (n = 1), lung (n = 1), breast (n = 2), prostate (n = 8), and pediatric (n = 3) malignancies treated with PBT that met eligibility criteria were included. QOL did not deteriorate during PBT for skull base and after PBT for brain tumors, respectively. PROs were higher for PBT than photon-based radiotherapy for both head/neck and lung cancer. Patient-reported breast cosmesis was appropriate after PBT and comparable to photon modalities. PBT in various settings of prostate cancer displayed an expected post-therapy decline; one study showed improved PROs (rectal urgency, bowel frequency) for PBT, and two others showed PROs/QOL comparable with other modalities. Pediatric studies demonstrated improvements in QOL during therapy, with additional increases thereafter. Conclusions Based on limited data, PBT provides favorable QOL/PRO profiles for select brain, head/neck, lung, and pediatric cancers; measures for prostate and breast cancers were more modest. These results have implications for cost-effective cancer care and prudently designed QOL evaluation in ongoing trials, which are discussed. Future data could substantially change the conclusions of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mizumoto M, Murayama S, Akimoto T, Demizu Y, Fukushima T, Ishida Y, Oshiro Y, Numajiri H, Fuji H, Okumura T, Shirato H, Sakurai H. Preliminary results of proton radiotherapy for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: a multi-institutional study in Japan. Cancer Med 2018; 7:1870-1874. [PMID: 29605967 PMCID: PMC5943484 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate preliminary results of proton radiotherapy (PRT) for pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). From 1987 to 2014, PRT was conducted as initial radiotherapy in 55 patients (35 males, 20 females, median age 5 years, range 0–19) with RMS at four institutes in Japan. Thirty‐one, 18, and six patients had embryonal, alveolar, and other RMS, respectively. One, 11, 37, and six patients were in IRSG groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively, and the COG risk group was low, intermediate, and high for nine, 39, and seven patients, respectively. The irradiation dose was 36–60 GyE (median: 50.4 GyE). The median follow‐up period was 24.5 months (range: 1.5–320.3). The 1‐ and 2‐year overall survival rates were 91.9% (95% CI: 84.3–99.5%) and 84.8% (95% CI 75.2–94.3%), respectively, and these rates were 100% and 100%, 97.1% and 90.1%, and 57.1% and 42.9% for COG low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups, respectively. There were 153 adverse events of Grade ≥3, including 141 hematologic toxicities in 48 patients (87%) and 12 radiation‐induced toxicities in nine patients (16%). Proton‐specific toxicity was not observed. PRT has the same treatment effect as photon radiotherapy with tolerable acute radiation‐induced toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Murayama
- Division of Proton Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Division of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bojaxhiu B, Ahlhelm F, Walser M, Placidi L, Kliebsch U, Mikroutsikos L, Morach P, Bolsi A, Lomax T, Pica A, Weber DC. Radiation Necrosis and White Matter Lesions in Pediatric Patients With Brain Tumors Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:987-996. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
37
|
Fu W, Chen L, Wang Z, Kang Y, Wu C, Xia Q, Liu Z, Zhou J, Liang G, Cai Y. Theoretical studies on FGFR isoform selectivity of FGFR1/FGFR4 inhibitors by molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2018; 19:3649-3659. [PMID: 28094372 DOI: 10.1039/c6cp07964d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The activation and overexpression of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are highly correlated with a variety of cancers. Most small molecule inhibitors of FGFRs selectively target FGFR1-3, but not FGFR4. Hence, designing highly selective inhibitors towards FGFR4 remains a great challenge because FGFR4 and FGFR1 have a high sequence identity. Recently, two small molecule inhibitors of FGFRs, ponatinib and AZD4547, have attracted huge attention. Ponatinib, a type II inhibitor, has high affinity towards FGFR1/4 isoforms, but AZD4547, a type I inhibitor of FGFR1, displays much reduced inhibition toward FGFR4. In this study, conventional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) free energy calculations and umbrella sampling (US) simulations were carried out to reveal the principle of the binding preference of ponatinib and AZD4547 towards FGFR4/FGFR1. The results provided by MM/GBSA illustrate that ponatinib has similar binding affinities to FGFR4 and FGFR1, while AZD4547 has much stronger binding affinity to FGFR1 than to FGFR4. A comparison of the individual energy terms suggests that the selectivity of AZD4547 towards FGFR1 versus FGFR4 is primarily controlled by the variation of the van der Waals interactions. The US simulations reveal that the PMF profile of FGFR1/AZD4547 has more peaks and valleys compared with that of FGFR4/AZD4547, suggesting that the dissociation process of AZD4547 from FGFR1 are easily trapped into local minima. Moreover, it is observed that FGFR1/AZD4547 has much higher PMF depth than FGFR4/AZD4547, implying that it is more difficult for AZD4547 to escape from FGFR1 than from FGFR4. The physical principles provided by this study extend our understanding of the binding mechanisms and provide valuable guidance for the rational design of FGFR isoform selective inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weitao Fu
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Lingfeng Chen
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Zhe Wang
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Yanting Kang
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China. and Epidemiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
| | - Chao Wu
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Qinqin Xia
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Zhiguo Liu
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Jianmin Zhou
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Guang Liang
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| | - Yuepiao Cai
- Chemical Biology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Medical physics in radiation Oncology: New challenges, needs and roles. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:375-378. [PMID: 29150160 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
39
|
Frisch S, Timmermann B. The Evolving Role of Proton Beam Therapy for Sarcomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:500-506. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
40
|
Trnková P, Bolsi A, Albertini F, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Factors influencing the performance of patient specific quality assurance for pencil beam scanning IMPT fields. Med Phys 2017; 43:5998. [PMID: 27806620 DOI: 10.1118/1.4964449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A detailed analysis of 2728 intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) fields that were clinically delivered to patients between 2007 and 2013 at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) was performed. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of patient specific dosimetric verifications and to assess possible correlation between the quality assurance (QA) results and specific field metrics. METHODS Dosimetric verifications were performed for every IMPT field prior to patient treatment. For every field, a steering file was generated containing all the treatment unit information necessary for treatment delivery: beam energy, beam angle, dose, size of air gap, nuclear interaction (NI) correction factor, number of range shifter plates, number of Bragg peaks (BPs) with their position and weight. This information was extracted and correlated to the results of dosimetric verification of each field which was a measurement of two orthogonal profiles using an orthogonal ionization chamber array in a movable water column. RESULTS The data analysis has shown more than 94% of all verified plans were within defined clinical tolerances. The differences between measured and calculated dose depend critically on the number of BPs, total thickness of all range shifter plates inserted in the beam path, and maximal range. An increase of the dose difference was observed with smaller number of BPs (i.e., smaller tumor) and smaller ranges (i.e., superficial tumors). The results of the verification do not depend, however, on the prescribed dose, NI correction, or the size of the air gap. There is no dependency of the transversal and longitudinal spot position precision on the beam angle. The value of NI correction depends on the number of spots and number of range shifter plates. CONCLUSIONS The presented study has shown that the verification method used at Centre for Proton Therapy at Paul Scherrer Institute is accurate and reproducible for performing patient specific QA. The results confirmed that the dose discrepancy is dependent on the size and location of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Trnková
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - A Bolsi
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - F Albertini
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - D C Weber
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland and Radiation Oncology Department, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse 71, Zürich 8006, Switzerland
| | - A J Lomax
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI West, Villigen 5232, Switzerland and Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, Zürich 8092, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|