1
|
de Vries ISA, van Ewijk R, Adriaansen LME, Bohte AE, Braat AJAT, Fajardo RD, Hiemcke-Jiwa LS, Hol MLF, Ter Horst SAJ, de Keizer B, Knops RRG, Meister MT, Schoot RA, Smeele LE, van Scheltinga ST, Vaarwerk B, Merks JHM, van Rijn RR. Imaging in rhabdomyosarcoma: a patient journey. Pediatr Radiol 2023; 53:788-812. [PMID: 36843091 PMCID: PMC10027795 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05596-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma, although rare, is the most frequent soft tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents. It can present as a mass at nearly any site in the body, with most common presentations in the head and neck, genitourinary tract and extremities. The optimal diagnostic approach and management of rhabdomyosarcoma require a multidisciplinary team with multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy and local therapy. Survival has improved over the last decades; however, further improvement in management is essential with current 5-year overall survival ranging from 35% to 100%, depending on disease and patient characteristics. In the full patient journey, from diagnosis, staging, management to follow-up after therapy, the paediatric radiologist and nuclear physician are essential members of the multidisciplinary team. Recently, guidelines of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group, the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe and the Oncology Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR), in an ongoing collaboration with the International Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium, provided guidance for high-quality imaging. In this educational paper, given as a lecture during the 2022 postgraduate ESPR course, the multi-disciplinary team of our national paediatric oncology centre presents the journey of two patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and discusses the impact on and considerations for the clinical (paediatric) radiologist and nuclear physician. The key learning points of the guidelines and their implementation in clinical practice are highlighted and up-to-date insights provided for all aspects from clinical suspicion of rhabdomyosarcoma and its differential diagnosis, to biopsy, staging, risk stratification, treatment response assessment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roelof van Ewijk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Laura M E Adriaansen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anneloes E Bohte
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Raquel Dávila Fajardo
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Laura S Hiemcke-Jiwa
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marinka L F Hol
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Simone A J Ter Horst
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger R G Knops
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael T Meister
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Reineke A Schoot
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ludi E Smeele
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NCI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatrics, Amsterdam UMC - Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rick R van Rijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC - Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Suite C1-423.1, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Vries ISA, van Ewijk R, Adriaansen LME, Bohte AE, Braat AJAT, Fajardo RD, Hiemcke-Jiwa LS, Hol MLF, Ter Horst SAJ, de Keizer B, Knops RRG, Meister MT, Schoot RA, Smeele LE, van Scheltinga ST, Vaarwerk B, Merks JHM, van Rijn RR. Correction to: Imaging in rhabdomyosarcoma: a patient journey. Pediatr Radiol 2023; 53:1043. [PMID: 36930287 PMCID: PMC10156756 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05642-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roelof van Ewijk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Laura M E Adriaansen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anneloes E Bohte
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Raquel Dávila Fajardo
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Laura S Hiemcke-Jiwa
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marinka L F Hol
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Simone A J Ter Horst
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger R G Knops
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael T Meister
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Reineke A Schoot
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ludi E Smeele
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NCI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatrics, Amsterdam UMC - Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rick R van Rijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC - Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Suite C1‑423.1, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phillips RS, Vaarwerk B, Morgan JE. Using Evidence-Based Medicine to Support Clinical Decision-Making in RMS. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010066. [PMID: 36612064 PMCID: PMC9817945 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The foundations of evidence-based practice are the triad of patient values and preferences, healthcare professional experience, and best available evidence, used together to inform clinical decision-making. Within the field of rhabdomyosarcoma, collaborative groups such as the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group (EpSSG) have worked to develop evidence to support this process. We have explored many of the key research developments within this review, including patient and public involvement, decision-making research, research into areas other than drug development, core outcome sets, reporting and dissemination of research, evidence synthesis, guideline development and clinical decision rules, research of research methodologies, and supporting research in RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S. Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
| | - Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatrics, Amsterdam UMC—Emma Children’s Hospital, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica E. Morgan
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vaarwerk B, van Rijn RR, Merks JHM. [Follow-up imaging in children with rhabdomyosarcoma: less scans, the same yield]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2021; 165:D6044. [PMID: 34854613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Children treated for rhabdomyosarcoma are subject to protocolized follow-up imaging to detect a potential relapse earlier and to improve the chances of survival in case of a relapse. In this study we report on our findings concerning the clinical value of radiologic imaging in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. We showed that the majority of relapses were detected by clinical symptoms, despite the frequent imaging. These results were used to define a new follow-up recommendation that was successfully implemented in the current European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group guideline. In this new recommendation we reduced the number of radiologic imaging examinations performed after end-of-therapy by 50%, and decreased the follow-up time after end-of-therapy to 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- Amsterdam UMC, Emma Kinderziekenhuis, afd. Kinderoncologie, Amsterdam
- Contact: Bas Vaarwerk
| | - Rick R van Rijn
- Amsterdam UMC, Emma Kinderziekenhuis, afd. Radiologie en Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Amsterdam
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaarwerk B, Breunis WB, Haveman LM, de Keizer B, Jehanno N, Borgwardt L, van Rijn RR, van den Berg H, Cohen JF, van Dalen EC, Merks JH. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) for the detection of bone, lung, and lymph node metastases in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD012325. [PMID: 34753195 PMCID: PMC8577863 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012325.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common paediatric soft-tissue sarcoma and can emerge throughout the whole body. For patients with newly diagnosed RMS, prognosis for survival depends on multiple factors such as histology, tumour site, and extent of the disease. Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis have impaired prognosis compared to those with localised disease. Appropriate staging at diagnosis therefore plays an important role in choosing the right treatment regimen for an individual patient. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional molecular imaging technique that uses the increased glycolysis of cancer cells to visualise both structural information and metabolic activity. 18F-FDG-PET combined with computed tomography (CT) could help to accurately stage the extent of disease in patients with newly diagnosed RMS. In this review we aimed to evaluate whether 18F-FDG-PET could replace other imaging modalities for the staging of distant metastases in RMS. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging for the detection of bone, lung, and lymph node metastases in RMS patients at first diagnosis. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE in PubMed (from 1966 to 23 December 2020) and Embase in Ovid (from 1980 to 23 December 2020) for potentially relevant studies. We also checked the reference lists of relevant studies and review articles; scanned conference proceedings; and contacted the authors of included studies and other experts in the field of RMS for information about any ongoing or unpublished studies. We did not impose any language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included cross-sectional studies involving patients with newly diagnosed proven RMS, either prospective or retrospective, if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing lymph node involvement or bone metastases or lung metastases or a combination of these metastases. We included studies that compared the results of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging with those of histology or with evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumour board as reference standard. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessement according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). We analysed data for the three outcomes (nodal involvement and lung and bone metastases) separately. We used data from the 2 × 2 tables (consisting of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives) to calculate sensitivity and specificity in each study and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. We did not consider a formal meta-analysis to be relevant because of the small number of studies and substantial heterogeneity between studies. MAIN RESULTS Two studies met our inclusion criteria. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT was reported in both studies, which included a total of 36 participants. We considered both studies to be at high risk of bias for the domain reference standard. We considered one study to be at high risk of bias for the domain index test and flow and timing. Sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases was 100% in both studies (95% confidence interval (CI) for sensitivity was 29% to 100% in study one and 40% to 100% in study two; 95% CI for specificity was 83% to 100% in study one and 66% to 100% in study two). The reported sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of lung metastases was not calculated since only two participants in study two showed lung metastases, of which one was detected by 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Reported specificity was 96% in study one (95% CI 78% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI 72% to 100%) in study two. The reported sensitivity for the detection of nodal involvement was 100% (95% CI 63% to 100% in study one and 40% to 100% in study two); the reported specificity was 100% (95% CI 78% to 100%) in study one and 89% (95% CI 52% to 100%) in study two. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone, lung, and lymph node metastases was reported in only two studies including a total of only 36 participants with newly diagnosed RMS. Because of the small number of studies (and participants), there is currently insufficient evidence to reliably determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the detection of distant metastases. Larger series evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of metastases in patients with RMS are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willemijn B Breunis
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lianne M Haveman
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nina Jehanno
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lise Borgwardt
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Rick R van Rijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henk van den Berg
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jérémie F Cohen
- Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), UMR1153, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Necker - Enfants malades hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | | | - Johannes Hm Merks
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vaarwerk B, Mallebranche C, Affinita MC, van der Lee JH, Ferrari A, Chisholm JC, Defachelles AS, De Salvo GL, Corradini N, Minard-Colin V, Morosi C, Brisse HJ, McHugh K, Bisogno G, van Rijn RR, Orbach D, Merks JHM. Is surveillance imaging in pediatric patients treated for localized rhabdomyosarcoma useful? The European experience. Cancer 2019; 126:823-831. [PMID: 31750944 PMCID: PMC7027831 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background After the completion of therapy, patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are subjected to intensive radiological tumor surveillance. However, the clinical benefit of this surveillance is unclear. This study retrospectively analyzed the value of off‐therapy surveillance by comparing the survival of patients in whom relapse was detected by routine imaging (the imaging group) and patients in whom relapse was first suspected by symptoms (the symptom group). Methods This study included patients with relapsed RMS after the completion of therapy for localized RMS who were treated in large pediatric oncology hospitals in France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and the Netherlands and who were enrolled in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 95 (1995‐2004) study, the Italian Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee Rhabdomyosarcoma 96 (1996‐2004) study, or the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group Rhabdomyosarcoma 2005 (2005‐2013) study. The survival times after relapse were compared with a log‐rank test between patients in the imaging group and patients in the symptom group. Results In total, 199 patients with relapsed RMS were included: 78 patients (39.2%) in the imaging group and 121 patients (60.8%) in the symptom group. The median follow‐up time after relapse was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 3.9‐11.5 years) for survivors (n = 86); the 3‐year postrelapse survival rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38%‐61%) for the imaging group and 46% (95% CI, 37%‐55%) for the symptom group (P = .7). Conclusions Although systematic routine imaging is the standard of care after RMS therapy, the majority of relapses were detected as a result of clinical symptoms. This study found no survival advantage for patients whose relapse was detected before the emergence of clinical symptoms. These results show that the value of off‐therapy surveillance is controversial, particularly because repeated imaging may also entail potential harm. This study assesses the clinical value of radiological surveillance imaging in pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, which is routinely performed after the completion of therapy. In the majority of patients, relapse is detected because of symptoms, and there is no evidence that early detection by imaging results in improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maria C Affinita
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Woman and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Johanna H van der Lee
- Pediatric Clinical Research Office, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- National Cancer Institute of Milan (Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare Foundation), Milan, Italy
| | - Julia C Chisholm
- Children and Young People's Department, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gian Luca De Salvo
- Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare), Padova, Italy
| | - Nadège Corradini
- Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Veronique Minard-Colin
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Carlo Morosi
- National Cancer Institute of Milan (Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare Foundation), Milan, Italy
| | - Hervé J Brisse
- SIREDO Oncology Center, PSL Research University, Curie Institute, Paris, France.,Imaging Department, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - Kieran McHugh
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Woman and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Rick R van Rijn
- Department of Radiology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Orbach
- SIREDO Oncology Center, PSL Research University, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - Johannes H M Merks
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vaarwerk B, Bisogno G, McHugh K, Brisse HJ, Morosi C, Corradini N, Jenney M, Orbach D, Chisholm JC, Ferrari A, Zanetti I, De Salvo GL, van Rijn RR, Merks JH. Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules at Diagnosis in Rhabdomyosarcoma: Are They Clinically Significant? A Report From the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:723-730. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis (defined as ≤ 4 pulmonary nodules < 5 mm or 1 nodule measuring ≥ 5 and < 10 mm) in patients with pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Patients and Methods We selected patients with supposed nonmetastatic RMS treated in large pediatric oncology centers in the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and the Netherlands, who were enrolled in the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (E pSSG) RMS 2005 study. Patients included in the current study received a diagnosis between September 2005 and December 2013, and had chest computed tomography scans available for review that were done at time of diagnosis. Local radiologists were asked to review the chest computed tomography scans for the presence of pulmonary nodules and to record their findings on a standardized case report form. In the E pSSG RMS 2005 Study, patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules were treated identically to patients without pulmonary nodules, enabling us to compare event-free survival and overall survival between groups by log-rank test. Results In total, 316 patients were included; 67 patients (21.2%) had indeterminate pulmonary nodules on imaging and 249 patients (78.8%) had no pulmonary nodules evident at diagnosis. Median follow-up for survivors (n = 258) was 75.1 months; respective 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates (95% CI) were 77.0% (64.8% to 85.5%) and 82.0% (69.7% to 89.6%) for patients with indeterminate nodules and 73.2% (67.1% to 78.3%) and 80.8% (75.1% to 85.3%) for patients without nodules at diagnosis ( P = .68 and .76, respectively). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis do not affect outcome in patients with otherwise localized RMS. There is no need to biopsy or upstage patients with RMS who have indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Kieran McHugh
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Meriel Jenney
- Children's Hospital for Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Johannes H.M. Merks
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vaarwerk B, Limperg PF, Naafs-Wilstra MC, Merks JHM, Grootenhuis MA. Getting control during follow-up visits: the views and experiences of parents on tumor surveillance after their children have completed therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3841-3848. [PMID: 30747278 PMCID: PMC6726689 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04678-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Patients treated for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) or Ewing sarcoma (ES) are subject to extensive follow-up after completion of therapy. The aim of this follow-up is to monitor treatment side effects and to detect relapse in an early phase to improve prognosis after relapse. Little is known about parental emotional experiences during this period. We assessed the views and experiences of parents of children treated for RMS or ES on the follow-up examinations after completion of therapy. Methods We conducted two focus group meetings and four semi-structured telephone interviews with parents of children treated for RMS or ES in Dutch pediatric oncology centers. Parents of children 0–5 years after end-of-therapy were invited via letters (response rate 31%) and via social media channels of “Dutch Childhood Association for Children and Parents” (VOKK). An inductive thematic approach was used to analyze the data. Results In total, 12 parents (fathers, n = 3; mothers, n = 9) of 12 patients treated for RMS (n = 6) or ES (n = 6) participated. Median age at diagnosis for their children was 7.9 years and median time after end-of-treatment was 37 months. Four major themes were identified: content of follow-up, distress and anxiety, search for reassurance and hope, and interaction with others. Parents of children treated for RMS or ES report experiencing significant distress after completion of treatment. They report that their distress was decreased by adequate communication about content, timing, and reasoning behind follow-up. Conclusion Physicians should pay attention to the needs of individual parents to reduce distress in the period after completion of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Lundlaan 6, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - P F Limperg
- Paediatric Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J H M Merks
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Lundlaan 6, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M A Grootenhuis
- Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Lundlaan 6, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Paediatric Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vaarwerk B, Schoot RA, Maurice-Stam H, Slater O, Hartley B, Saeed P, Gajdosova E, van den Brekel MW, Balm AJM, Hol MLF, van Jaarsveld S, Kremer LCM, Ronckers CM, Mandeville HC, Pieters BR, Gaze MN, Davila Fajardo R, Strackee SD, Dunaway D, Smeele LE, Chisholm JC, Caron HN, Grootenhuis MA, Merks JHM. Psychosocial well-being of long-term survivors of pediatric head-neck rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27498. [PMID: 30318743 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) survivors are at risk to develop adverse events (AEs). The impact of these AEs on psychosocial well-being is unclear. We aimed to assess psychosocial well-being of HNRMS survivors and examine whether psychosocial outcomes were associated with burden of therapy. PROCEDURE Sixty-five HNRMS survivors (median follow-up: 11.5 years), treated in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2010 and alive ≥2 years after treatment visited the outpatient multidisciplinary follow-up clinic once, in which AEs were scored based on a predefined list according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Survivors were asked to complete questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQoL; PedsQL and YQOL-FD), self-perception (KIDSCREEN), and satisfaction with appearances (SWA). HRQoL and self-perception scores were compared with reference values, and the correlation between physician-assessed AEs and psychosocial well-being was assessed. RESULTS HNRMS survivors showed significantly lower scores on PedsQL school/work domain (P ≤ 0.01, P = 0.02, respectively), YQOL-FD domains negative self-image and positive consequences (P ≤ 0.01, P = 0.04, respectively) compared with norm data; scores on negative consequences domain were significantly higher (P = 0.03). Over 50% of survivors negatively rated their appearances on three or more items. Burden of AEs was not associated with generic HRQoL and self-perception scores, but was associated with disease-specific QoL (YQOL-FD). CONCLUSION In general, HRQoL in HNRMS survivors was comparable to reference groups; however, survivors did report disease-specific consequences. We therefore recommend including specific questionnaires related to difficulties with facial appearance in a systematic monitoring program to determine the necessity for tailored care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Reineke A Schoot
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen Maurice-Stam
- Paediatric Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Slater
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Hartley
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peerooz Saeed
- Orbital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Gajdosova
- Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michiel W van den Brekel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons J M Balm
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marinka L F Hol
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie van Jaarsveld
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry C Mandeville
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raquel Davila Fajardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon D Strackee
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Dunaway
- Craniofacial Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ludi E Smeele
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia C Chisholm
- Children and Young People's Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Huib N Caron
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martha A Grootenhuis
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Paediatric Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H M Merks
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vaarwerk B, Hol MLF, Schoot RA, Breunis WB, de Win MML, Westerveld H, Fajardo RD, Saeed P, van den Brekel MW, Pieters BR, Strackee SD, Smeele LE, Merks JHM. AMORE treatment as salvage treatment in children and young adults with relapsed head-neck rhabdomyosarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:21-26. [PMID: 30773183 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Survival after relapse of head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) after prior external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is poor, since options for adequate local treatment are often lacking. In this study we describe our experience with salvage AMORE in patients with relapsed HNRMS after prior EBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with relapsed HNRMS after prior EBRT in which salvage AMORE treatment was considered feasible were analysed; this includes patients with parameningeal, head and neck non-parameningeal and orbital localization. AMORE treatment consisted of Ablative surgery, MOuld technique brachytherapy and surgical REconstruction. RESULTS In total 18 patients received salvage AMORE treatment; nine patients had relapsed parameningeal (PM) RMS, two patients had relapsed head and neck non-parameningeal RMS (HN-nonPM) and seven patients had relapsed orbital RMS. Local control rate was 67% and 5-year overall survival was 54% (95% confidence interval: 31-78%); 3/9 patients with PM RMS, 0/2 patients with HN-nonPM RMS and 6/7 patients with orbital RMS were alive after a median follow-up of 8.6 years. One patient with PM RMS survived more than 5 years after which he died from a secondary cancer. Six patients developed a local relapse (of which one patient also developed a distant metastasis) and two patients developed distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS Salvage AMORE treatment is a feasible and effective local therapy approach even after prior EBRT. Since salvage AMORE treatment is sometimes the only curative option in patient with relapsed HNRMS, we encourage physicians to consider salvage AMORE treatment for patients with relapsed HNRMS after prior EBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marinka L F Hol
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reineke A Schoot
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn B Breunis
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje M L de Win
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrike Westerveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raquel Davila Fajardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peerooz Saeed
- Orbital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel W van den Brekel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon D Strackee
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ludi E Smeele
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H M Merks
- Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vaarwerk B, van der Lee JH, Breunis WB, Orbach D, Chisholm JC, Cozic N, Jenney M, van Rijn RR, McHugh K, Gallego S, Glosli H, Devalck C, Gaze MN, Kelsey A, Bergeron C, Stevens MCG, Oberlin O, Minard-Colin V, Merks JHM. Prognostic relevance of early radiologic response to induction chemotherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 95 study. Cancer 2017; 124:1016-1024. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Vaarwerk
- Department of Pediatric Oncology; Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Johanna H. van der Lee
- Pediatric Clinical Research Office; Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Willemijn B. Breunis
- Department of Pediatric Oncology; Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Orbach
- Department of Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Oncology; Curie Institute; Paris France
| | - Julia C. Chisholm
- Children and Young People's Department; Royal Marsden Hospital; Sutton United Kingdom
| | - Nathalie Cozic
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; Gustave-Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - Meriel Jenney
- Department of Pediatric Oncology; Children's Hospital for Wales; Cardiff United Kingdom
| | - Rick R. van Rijn
- Pediatric Radiology; Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Kieran McHugh
- Department of Radiology; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children; London United Kingdom
| | - Soledad Gallego
- Pediatric Oncology; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital; Barcelona Spain
| | - Heidi Glosli
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo Norway
| | - Christine Devalck
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology Department; Children's University Hospital; Brussels Belgium
| | - Mark N. Gaze
- Department of Oncology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London United Kingdom
| | - Anna Kelsey
- Pathology Department; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital; Manchester United Kingdom
| | | | - Michael C. G. Stevens
- Department of Pediatric Oncology; Bristol Royal Hospital for Children; Bristol United Kingdom
| | - Odile Oberlin
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology; Gustave-Roussy; Villejuif France
| | | | - Johannes H. M. Merks
- Department of Pediatric Oncology; Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Breunis WB, Haveman LM, Vaarwerk B, Owers EC, van Rijn RR, van den Berg H, Cohen JF, Kremer LCM, van Dalen EC, Merks JHM. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) for the detection of bone, lung and lymph node metastases in rhabdomyosarcoma. Hippokratia 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn B Breunis
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Lianne M Haveman
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Bas Vaarwerk
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Emilia C Owers
- Academic Medical Center; Department of Nuclear Medicine; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Rick R van Rijn
- Academic Medical Center Amsterdam; Department of Radiology; Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam Netherlands 1105 AZ
| | - Henk van den Berg
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Jérémie F Cohen
- Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), Inserm UMR1153, Paris Descartes University; Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé); Paris France
| | - Leontien CM Kremer
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Elvira C van Dalen
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| | - Johannes HM Merks
- Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center; Department of Paediatric Oncology; PO Box 22660 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DD
| |
Collapse
|