Hypofractionated radiation therapy for basal and squamous cell skin cancer: A meta-analysis

Single-Fraction Palliative High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Symptom Management in a 97-Year-Old Patient With Dementia

Background: Delivering cancer treatment to elderly patients with dementia is often challenging. We describe performing palliative surface mold brachytherapy (SMBT) in an elderly patient with advanced dementia for pain control using music therapy to assist with agitation. Case Description: The patient was a 97-year-old Japanese woman with advanced dementia. Exudate was observed from her tumor, and she complained of Grade 2 severity pain using Support team assessment schedule (STAS), especially when undergoing would dressings. Given her advanced dementia, she was not considered a candidate for radical surgery or external beam radiotherapy. We instead treated her with high-dose-rate (HDR) SMBT. Due to her advanced dementia associated with agitation, she could not maintain her position. She was able to remain calm while listening to traditional Japanese enka music, which enables our team to complete her radiation without using anesthetics or sedating analgesics. Her localized pain severity decreased ≤21 days and the exudate fluid disappeared ≤63 days after HDR-SMBT. Her tumor was locally controlled until her death from intercurrent disease 1 year after HDR-SMBT. Discussion: Single fraction palliative HDR-SMBT was useful for successful treatment of skin cancer in an elderly patient. Traditional Japanese music helped reduce her agitation to complete HDR-SMBT. For elderly patients with agitation associated with dementia, we should consider using music and music therapy to facilitate radiation therapy.

Review of recent advances in managing periocular skin malignancies

Management of cutaneous malignancies can be particularly challenging when they are located in the periocular region. The standard of care for localized disease is complete surgical excision, but this may not be possible without significant disruption to visual structures and facial appearance. Definitive radiation may be an option for some patients who cannot or do not wish to undergo surgery. Advances in systemic treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic skin cancers in the past 10 years have prompted investigation into neoadjuvant treatment of periocular cancers. The use of chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted therapies have all been reported with varying degrees of success. For many patients, targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors should be considered depending on the cancer type, symptoms, and goals with the input of a multidisciplinary cancer care team. In this article, we systematically review the latest updates in surgical, radiotherapeutic, and medical management of periocular malignancies.

Effect of Jaw Tracking During Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Facial Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to analyze the dosimetric effects of jaw tracking during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning for facial non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 50 patients with facial NMSC who underwent VMAT planning with or without jaw tracking. The target volume (TV) included the primary skin lesion with a 1-cm margin around the surface and a depth of 4 mm. A total of 55 Gy in 20 fractions was prescribed, and the plans were considered acceptable if the TV was covered by 95-105% of the isodose curve. A dosimetric comparison was performed for the volumes of the low-dose regions, which were defined as <50% of the prescription dose (V10-50%). Target coverage was evaluated using the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI).

RESULTS

The patients' mean TV was 5.137 cc (range=1.03-15.89 cc). Jaw tracking resulted in mean volume reduction rates of 3.9%, 6.6% 10.6% and 13.8% for V40%, V30%, V20%, and V10%, respectively (all p<0.001). The volume change in V50% between the two groups was 2.7% (p=0.006). No significant differences were observed in HI (p=0.449) or CI (p=0.127).

CONCLUSION

The application of jaw tracking during VMAT for facial NMSC is associated with a significant reduction in the volume of low dose delivered in the radiation field (V10-50%), while maintaining target coverage. Future analyses should assess whether this volume difference affects treatment-related cosmetic outcomes.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunct treatment of periodontitis, MRONJ, and ONJ: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

To review the available prospective literature on hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for periodontal conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed to identify clinical studies on adult patients who underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy for periodontal treatments. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Dentistry Oral Sciences Source databases.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were included in the final literature review, of which five were RCTs and 11 were prospective clinical studies. Four studies discussed HBO as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of periodontitis, eight reported on HBO and osteoradionecrosis, and one examined HBO in bisphosphonate-related necrosis of the jaws.

CONCLUSIONS

HBO has shown superior efficacy compared to antibiotics as a prophylactic measure in preventing osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients with a history of high mandibular irradiation. Clinicians should consider referring such patients for HBO therapy before and after tooth extractions. However, for the surgical excision of existing ORN lesions, HBO therapy does not yield significant benefits but does not negatively impact outcomes either. Regarding the treatment of periodontitis patients, the variability among studies prevents definitive conclusions. HBO therapy as an adjunct to SRP in periodontitis treatment produces mixed results.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study's clinical relevance lies in its exploration of the potential benefits of HBO for periodontal conditions. Also, it provides clinicians with insights into when and how to integrate HBO therapy into their treatment approaches, particularly for patients with a history of irradiation and those undergoing complex dental procedures.

Successful Treatment of Facial Merkel Cell Carcinoma Using CyberKnife Radiotherapy Alone: A Case Report

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin tumor. Herein, we present a case of MCC which was successfully treated with radiotherapy alone using CyberKnife® (CK) (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, California, United States). An 86-year-old female patient presented with multiple painless pink rash skin tumors on the left cheek. The patient was diagnosed with MCC based on a lesion biopsy (T2cN2M0, stage IIIB). The patient was referred for CK radiotherapy (CKR) at our institution because of her advanced age and inoperative lesions. The patient underwent CKR alone, with a planning target volume (PTV) of 14.9 ml, a prescribed dose of 30 Gy, a maximum dose of 46.2 Gy, and an isodose line (the minimum dose of 95% of the PTV) of 65% in 10 fractions for 13 days. The lesions had completely regressed on the last day of CKR. Left cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) appeared 10 months after CKR. The patient underwent a second CKR for CLNM, the PTV was 4.6 ml, and the prescribed dose was 27 Gy in three fractions for three days. The CLNM had completely regressed one month later after the second CKR. Primary lesions did not recur for 33 months after the initial CKR, and CLNM did not reappear for 23 months after the second CKR with good cosmetic results. No CKR-related adverse event occurred in our follow-up period. Our present case indicates that CKR is an effective treatment option for patients with MCC, particularly elderly patients who may not be suitable candidates for extensive surgical resection.

Immunotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Older Patients with Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

Cutaneous skin carcinoma is a disease of older patients. The prevalence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC) increases with age. The head and neck region is a frequent place of occurrence due to exposure to ultraviolet light. Surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy is frequently advocated for locally advanced disease to decrease the risk of loco-regional recurrence. However, older cancer patients may not be candidates for surgery due to frailty and/or increased risk of complications. Radiotherapy is usually advocated for unresectable patients. Compared to basal-cell carcinoma, locally advanced cSCC tends to recur locally and/or can metastasize, especially in patients with high-risk features such as poorly differentiated histology and perineural invasion. Thus, a new algorithm needs to be developed for older patients with locally advanced head and neck cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma to improve their survival and conserve their quality of life. Recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has attracted much attention due to the high prevalence of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cSCC. A high response rate was observed following CPI administration with acceptable toxicity. Those with residual disease may be treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy to minimize the risk of recurrence, as radiotherapy may enhance the effect of immunotherapy. We propose a protocol combining CPIs and hypofractionated radiotherapy for older patients with locally advanced cutaneous head and neck cancer who are not candidates for surgery. Prospective studies should be performed to verify this hypothesis.

Skin cancer: understanding the journey of transformation from conventional to advanced treatment approaches

Skin cancer is a global threat to the healthcare system and is estimated to incline tremendously in the next 20 years, if not diagnosed at an early stage. Even though it is curable at an early stage, novel drug identification, clinical success, and drug resistance is another major challenge. To bridge the gap and bring effective treatment, it is important to understand the etiology of skin carcinoma, the mechanism of cell proliferation, factors affecting cell growth, and the mechanism of drug resistance. The current article focusses on understanding the structural diversity of skin cancers, treatments available till date including phytocompounds, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, photothermal therapy, surgery, combination therapy, molecular targets associated with cancer growth and metastasis, and special emphasis on nanotechnology-based approaches for downregulating the deleterious disease. A detailed analysis with respect to types of nanoparticles and their scope in overcoming multidrug resistance as well as associated clinical trials has been discussed.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma-update 2023

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumour in white populations. Multidisciplinary experts from European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), European Dermatology Forum, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology developed updated recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of BCC. BCCs were categorised into 'easy-to-treat' (common) and 'difficult-to-treat' according to the new EADO clinical classification. Diagnosis is based on clinico-dermatoscopic features, although histopathological confirmation is mandatory in equivocal lesions. The first-line treatment of BCC is complete surgery. Micrographically controlled surgery shall be offered in high-risk and recurrent BCC, and BCC located on critical anatomical sites. Topical therapies and destructive approaches can be considered in patients with low-risk superficial BCC. Photodynamic therapy is an effective treatment for superficial and low-risk nodular BCCs. Management of 'difficult-to-treat' BCCs should be discussed by a multidisciplinary tumour board. Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs), vismodegib or sonidegib, should be offered to patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC. Immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies (cemiplimab) is a second-line treatment in patients with a progression of disease, contraindication, or intolerance to HHI therapy. Radiotherapy represents a valid alternative in patients who are not candidates for or decline surgery, especially elderly patients. Electrochemotherapy may be offered when surgery or radiotherapy is contraindicated. In Gorlin patients, regular skin examinations are required to diagnose and treat BCCs at an early stage. Long-term follow-up is recommended in patients with high-risk BCC, multiple BCCs, and Gorlin syndrome.

Early clinical experience with a degraded 4 MeV electron beam in radiotherapy of superficial basal cell carcinoma

The most common non-melanoma skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Surgery is the gold standard treatment but also non-surgical alternatives are needed. The purpose of this work was to present the early clinical experiences of degraded 4 MeV electron beam as a treatment method for superficial BCC. Twelve patients underwent two weeks radiation therapy treatment with either 5 × 7 Gy or 2 × 12 Gy. There were no significant differences in treatment outcome with different fractionations or lesion locations. The degraded beam method is a safe and valid non-surgical solution for suitable patients with superficial lesions.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp in the elderly: Efficacy and tolerance, preliminary results

PURPOSE

Skin squamous cells carcinomas (SCC) are frequently tumor, especially in the elderly population. Surgical excision is the standard treatment. But for patients suffering large tumor or/with comorbidity, a conservative approach with irradiation can be proposed. The hypofractionated schedule is used to shorten the overall treatment time with same results and without compromising therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of hypofractionated radiotherapy for invasive SCC of the scalp in elderly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients suffering from SCC of the scalp and treated by hypofractionated radiotherapy at the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine or centre Émile-Durkeim d'Épinal, from January 2019 to December 2021. Characteristics of patients, size of the lesion and side effects were collected retrospectively. Tumor size at 6 months corresponded to the primary endpoint. Toxicity was collected for the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with a median age of 85 years old were included. The mean size was 4,5cm with a bone invasion in 2/3 of cases. Radiotherapy was delivered after surgical excision for half of the patient. The dose delivered was 54Gy in 18 daily fractions size. Six months after irradiation: 6/11 patients had no residual lesion, 2/11 had a partial response with a residual lesion of about 1cm. 3 patients presented local recurrence. One patient died within 6 months of radiotherapy because of another comorbidity. In total, 25% had presented a grade 3 acute radiation dermatitis, no grade 4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Short term of moderately hypofractionated schedule radiotherapy was a success with complete or partial response for more than 70% of the patients in squamous cell carcinomas. There is no major side effect.

The State of the Art of Radiotherapy for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Due to the general aging population and the fashion trend of sun exposure, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is rising. The management of NMSC is difficult and necessitates a multidisciplinary team (i.e., pathologists, dermatologists, medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists). When surgery is not an option or will cause unacceptably functional morbidity, radiation therapy (RT) may be a preferable tissue-preserving option. Whether used alone or in conjunction with other treatments, RT has been shown to be quite effective in terms of cosmetic results and local control. Contact hypofractionated RT, brachytherapy, and electronic brachytherapy are all promising new treatments. However, rigorous, randomized trials are missing, explaining the disparity in dose, fractionation, and technique recommendations. Therefore, it is essential that interdisciplinary teams better understand RT modalities, benefits, and drawbacks. Our review will provide the role and indications for RT in patients with NMSC.

Characterization of clinical outcomes after shorter course hypofractionated and standard-course radiotherapy for stage I-III curatively-treated Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of curative hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) regimens compared to conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy (conv-RT) for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 241 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MCC from 2005-2021 and who received RT at Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse using Gray's test with competing risks of death and isolated out-of-field recurrence. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival using log-rank tests, and risk factors of recurrence using Cox-proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

There were 50 (20.6%) and 193 (79.4%) courses of hypo-RT and conv-RT, respectively. The hypo-RT cohort was older (≥73 years at diagnosis: 78.0% vs. 41.5%, p<0.01), and received a lower equivalent total RT dose in 2 Gy per fraction (<50 Gy: 58.0% vs. 5.2%, p<0.01). Median follow-up was 65.1 months (range: 1.2-194.5) for conv-RT and 25.0 months (range: 1.6-131.3) for hypo-RT cohorts. Two-year cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse was low in both groups (1.1% conv-RT vs. 4.1% hypo-RT, p=0.114). While two-year OS was lower for the hypo-RT group (62.6% vs. 84.4%, p=0.0008), two-year MCC-specific survival was similar (84.7 vs. 86.6%, p=0.743). On multivariable analysis, immunosuppression, clinical stage III disease, and lymphovascular invasion were associated with any-recurrence when controlling for sex, age, and hypo-RT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was no difference in cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse or MCC-specific survival between hypo-RT and conv-RT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm hypo-RT as an efficacious treatment option for MCC.

Update on Management Recommendations for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common form of skin cancer, which predominantly occurs on the head and neck. Early detection and treatment of primary tumours is crucial to limit progression and local invasion of deep tissues. While high-risk markers of poor prognosis have been identified, factors predicting regional control or survival remain uncertain. Therefore, diagnosis and management of cSCC should be performed individually, considering patient’s clinicopathological profile and the best available treatment options. Surgical excision, radiotherapy, and/or systemic treatments can be selected depending on patient’s status and tumour stage. Considering that a more comprehensive assessment will be provided by a multidisciplinary team, we aimed to generate a practical document that may assist oncologists and dermatologists on the prognosis, diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with advanced cSCC.

Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common form of skin cancer, the incidence of which has risen over the last years. Although cSCC rarely metastasizes, early detection and treatment of primary tumours are critical to limit progression and local invasion. Several prognostic factors related to patients’ clinicopathologic profile and tumour features have been identified as high-risk markers and included in the stratification scales, but their association with regional control or survival is uncertain. Therefore, decision-making on the diagnosis and management of cSCC should be made based on each individual patient’s characteristics. Recent advances in non-invasive imaging techniques and molecular testing have enhanced clinical diagnostic accuracy. Surgical excision is the mainstay of local treatment, whereas radiotherapy (RT) is recommended for patients with inoperable disease or in specific circumstances. Novel systemic treatments including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have changed the therapeutic landscape for cSCC. The anti-PD-1 agent cemiplimab is currently the only FDA/EMA-approved first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or RT. Given the likelihood of recurrence and the increased risk of developing multiple cSCC, close follow-up should be performed during the first years of treatment and continued long-term surveillance is warranted.

Radiation therapy of cutaneous cancers

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy of cutaneous cancers. The indications of radiotherapy for skin cancers are not clearly defined because of the lack of randomized trials or prospective studies. For basal cell carcinomas, radiotherapy frequently offers a good local control, but a randomized trial showed that surgery is more efficient and less toxic. Indications of radiotherapy are contra-indications of surgery for patients older than 60, non-sclerodermiform histology and located in non-sensitive areas. Adjuvant radiotherapy could be proposed to squamous cell carcinomas, in case of poor prognostic factors. Dose of 60 to 70Gy are usually required, and must be modulated to the size of the lesions. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems beneficial for desmoplastic melanomas but not for the other histological types. Prophylactic nodal irradiation (45 to 50Gy), for locally advanced tumors (massive nodal involvement), decreases the locoregional failure rate but do not increase survival. Adjuvant radio- therapy (50 to 56Gy) for Merkel cell carcinomas increases also the local control rate, as demonstrated by meta-analysis and a large epidemiological study. Nodal areas must be included, if there is no surgical exploration (sentinel lymph node dissection). Kaposi sarcomas are radiosensitive and could be treated with relatively low doses (24 to 30Gy). Also, cutaneous lymphomas are good indications for radiotherapy: B lymphomas are electively treated with limited fields. The role of total skin electron therapy for T-lymphomas is still discussed; but palliative radiotherapy is very efficient in case of cutaneous nodules.

Radiotherapy in the Adjuvant and Advanced Setting of CSCC

Introduction

The use of radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has solid historical roots. It is used with patients who are not suitable for surgery, with patients with high-risk histological features in the adjuvant setting, and in palliative care.

Objectives

The aim of this article is to summarize and provide a radiation therapy overview on the indications, effectiveness, and potential adverse events of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting of CSCC.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature review on PubMed, adopted as our biomedical literature database. Articles were selected based on their date of publication (in the last 30 years) and relevance.

Results

Radiotherapy (RT) can safely be used to manage non-surgical patients and high-risk patients in the advanced CSCC setting. The remarkable progress of delivery techniques has greatly improved the effectiveness and toxicity profile of RT treatments. From 2D techniques to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy, all RT techniques have greatly advanced. To improve acute and chronic side effects, a deeper care has been used. As regards CSCC, several dose fractionations and schedules have been suggested, in line with the patient's age and medical conditions.

Conclusions

RT is a fundamental and constantly evolving therapeutic option in the treatment of CSCC, to minimize the risk of recurrence and metastases in the adjuvant setting and in the exclusive treatment for non-surgical patients. Patients' selection is crucial, together with and a collaborative team working approach among the specialists involved in disease management in the perspective of the best multidisciplinary assessment.

Two different sizes of Valencia applicators in non-melanoma skin cancer treatment with iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze tumor control, toxicity, and aesthetic outcome of patients affected by non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and treated with iridium-192 (192Ir) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) using Valencia applicators at the Division of Radiotherapy, University of Pisa.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From June 2015 to December 2020, 95 NMSC patients, including 61.5% basal cell carcinoma and 38.5% squamous cell carcinoma patients, with median age of 83 years (range, 32-96 years) were treated. In total, 182 lesions with a diameter ≤ 25 mm (median, 12 mm) and a depth ≤ 4 mm, located in scalp (19.2%), face (20.9%), chest (8.8%), nose (16.5%), ear (15.4%), and extremities (19.2%) were analyzed. All lesions were treated with 192Ir-based HDR afterloader using Valencia applicators. 105 lesions (57.7%) were treated with applicator of 20 mm and 77 lesions (42.3%) with applicator of 30 mm in diameter, depending on the size of lesions. Prescribed dose was 40 Gy in 8 fractions (5 Gy/fraction) delivered 2-3 times a week. Biological effective dose (BED) was ≈ 60 Gy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 14 months (range, 3-59 months). The 2-year local control rate was 96%. According to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v. 5.0), G1-G2 acute toxicities included dermatitis (22.0%) and pain (8.2%). The most common G1 late toxicities were hypopigmentation (27.5%) and fibrosis (8.2%), and G2 late toxicity included ulceration (0.5%). No G3 or higher acute or late toxicities were reported. Excellent cosmetic results were observed in 77.5% of the lesions, with one only (0.5%) reported as a poor cosmetic result (ulceration refractory to therapy).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BT using Valencia applicators is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment modality for NMSC, and can be considered a good alternative for treatment, especially in elderly patients who are often unfit for surgery.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience in 31 cases

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, radiation therapies have been modulated to reduce the risk of infection during outpatient activities and hypofractionated regimens or radiotherapy delay for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) were suggested. Hypofractionated radiotherapy not only may confer no disadvantage in regard to outcome when compared to a more protracted schedule but might also reduce the risk of infection. We report the experience of a dermatologic radiation therapy department concerning a group of patients with a diagnosis of NMSC selected for a radiation treatment plan aimed to minimize the number of their accesses to our department.

Additive manufacturing (3D printing) in superficial brachytherapy

The aim of this work is to provide an overview of the current state of additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, within superficial brachytherapy (BT). Several comprehensive database searches were performed to find publications linked to AM in superficial BT. Twenty-eight core publications were found, which can be grouped under general categories of clinical cases, physical and dosimetric evaluations, proof-of-concept cases, design process assessments, and economic feasibility studies. Each study demonstrated a success regarding AM implementation and collectively, they provided benefits over traditional applicator fabrication techniques. Publications of AM in superficial BT have increased significantly in the last 5 years. This is likely due to associated efficiency and consistency benefits; though, more evidences are needed to determine the true extent of these benefits.

Treating Low-Grade Myxofibrosarcoma With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using CyberKnife®

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Low-grade MFS has a high local recurrence rate, similar to that of high-grade MFS. Hence, appropriate adjuvant therapy is required to control low-grade MFS. In this report, we present a case in which recurrent low-grade MFS was successfully treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using CyberKnife® (CK) (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA). A 76-year-old man underwent SBRT using CK for recurrent low-grade MFS in the right posterior chest wall after undergoing resection and skin grafting four and three times, respectively. We planned CK treatment separately for each in two parts. For the lesion on the scapula side, the target volume was 109 cm³ and the total prescribed dose was 34.6 Gy, while the lesion on the spinal side had a target volume of 72 cm³ and a total prescribed dose of 36 Gy, both in five fractions. Each SBRT was performed on alternate days in a span of 14 days. The tumors gradually reduced in size with tolerable levels of toxicity. SBRT using CK could be a safe and effective adjuvant therapy for low-grade MFS.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head-and-Neck Region

BACKGROUND/AIM

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common type of skin cancer. Options for palliative treatment include systemic agents and radiotherapy. Selection of a radiation regimen should consider the patient's survival prognosis. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors of survival after palliative radiotherapy for cSCC of the head-and-neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten factors were analyzed for survival in 12 patients including age, gender, tumor site, histological grade, primary tumor stage, lymph node involvement, distant metastases, upfront surgery, radiation dose and completion of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, improved survival was significantly associated with lower histological grade (better differentiation) (p=0.022), no distant metastases (p=0.040) and completion of radiotherapy (p=0.014). In the multivariate analysis, lower histological grade (risk ratio=6.05, p=0.100) and completion of radiotherapy (risk ratio=4.87, p=0.115) showed trends.

CONCLUSION

Predictors of survival were identified that can help design individual treatments. Patients require optimal supportive care as completion of radiotherapy was associated with better survival.

A small case series about safety and effectiveness of a hypofractionated electron beam radiotherapy schedule in five fractions for facial non melanoma skin cancer among frail and elderly patients

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate local control and toxicities of strongly hypofractionated electron beam radiotherapy (RT) in elderly and fragile patients with facial nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC).

Materials and methods

We enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years with facial NMSC, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 40 and life expectancy ≥ 6 months, amenable neither to daily RT nor surgery. Radiotherapy consisted of 35 Gy, delivered with 6 MeV electron beam, in 5 fractions of 7 Gy/day twice a week (tw). Prescription isodoses were 100% for cT1-cT2 and 90% for cT3-cT4. Objective response was assessed clinically 4 and 8 weeks after the end of RT and then monitored every 6 months. Side effects were assessed according to the CTCAE scale.

Results

12 patients of median age 89.5 years with a total of 23 NMSC cN0 achieved a median follow-up time of 6 months (range 1-10), with total treatment compliance. 10/12 patients had a 40 ≤ KPS < 70 and 2/12 a 70 ≤ KPS < 90. 5/12 patients had synchronous lesions. 22/23 lesions were classified as T1-T2 and had complete response (CR), 1/23 as T4 with partial response (PR). Within 4 weeks after the end of treatment, G1 toxicity was reported for 12/23 lesions, G2 for 8/23, G3 for 3/23, G4 for 0/23, all disappeared 8 weeks later, with or without topical therapy. After last follow-up (1 June 2020) 1/12 patients died with PR from senile marasmus, 11/12 are alive with CR and widely tolerated toxicities.

Conclusions

Extreme hypofractionation of radiotherapy dose for facial NMSC is effective, safe and suitable for elderly patients.

Radiation Therapy for Cutaneous Malignancies of the Head and Neck

Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the management of cutaneous malignancies of the head and neck. This article highlights the use of radiation therapy in the definitive and adjuvant setting for basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. Themes that emerge include the overall efficacy of radiation therapy as a local therapy, the relevance of cosmesis, functional outcomes, late toxicities as secondary end points, and the multitude of treatment modalities that are used.

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas on Sensitive Areas of the Face: A Report of Clinical Outcomes and Acute and Subacute Toxicities

Purpose

Basal cell and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are common malignancies (keratinocyte carcinomas [KCs]). Surgical resection is the standard of care. Radiation using high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) may serve as a superior alternative where surgical scars may be of cosmetic concern or in elderly patients with significant comorbidity. We aim to describe the clinical and cosmetic outcomes as well as posttreatment radiation toxicities associated with HDR-BT in patients who were treated for KCs of the face.

Methods and Materials

Patients with KCs treated with HDR-BT from 2015 to 2018 were included in the study. Patient medical records and clinical photos were reviewed at multiple time points: start of treatment, end of treatment, short-term (2 week) follow-up, 3-month follow-up, and if needed at 6 months. Radiation toxicity was graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Grading (RTOG) acute toxicity scale. Median (range) toxicity grades at follow-up intervals were calculated. Clinical outcomes including local recurrence were evaluated for all patients.

Results

The study included 19 patients and 20 KCs. The median radiation dose was 42 Gy (39-42 Gy) over 6 fractions. The median toxicity at completion of treatment was RTOG grade 2 (85% of patients). At short-term follow-up, 50% of patients (n = 10) improved to RTOG grade 1 (0-2). At 3 months, 70% of patients (n = 14) had RTOG grade 0, and by 6 months, 100% of patients (n = 18) had RTOG grade 0. No RTOG grade 3 or higher skin toxicity was observed. With a median follow-up of 7.2 months (range, 1.3-54.4 months), the local recurrence-free survival was 95%.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that HDR-BT can be used as definitive treatment of KCs of the face with excellent cosmetic outcomes and local control. Acute and subacute skin toxicities were most commonly RTOG grade 2 or less with resolution of patient's skin toxicity by 3 months.

The American Brachytherapy society consensus statement for skin brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Keratinocyte carcinoma (KC, previously nonmelanoma skin cancer) represents the most common cancer worldwide. While surgical treatment is commonly utilized, various radiation therapy techniques are available including external beam and brachytherapy. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society has created an updated consensus statement regarding the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of KCs.

METHODS

Physicians and physicists with expertise in skin cancer and brachytherapy created a consensus statement for appropriate patient selection, data, dosimetry, and utilization of skin brachytherapy and techniques based on a literature search and clinical experience.

RESULTS

Guidelines for patient selection, evaluation, and dose/fractionation schedules to optimize outcomes for patients with KC undergoing brachytherapy are presented. Studies of electronic brachytherapy are emerging, although limited long-term data or comparative data are available. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents an appropriate option for patients with small KCs with multiple techniques available.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin brachytherapy represents a standard of care option for appropriately selected patients with KC. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents a well-established technique; however, the current recommendation is that electronic brachytherapy be used for KC on prospective clinical trial or registry because of a paucity of mature data.

Mild Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm. Although surgical resection is the first-line treatment for primary MCCs, the characteristics of this disease (i.e., high prevalence in the elderly and in the head and neck region) generate a considerable number of inoperable cases. Radiation therapy shows potential as a definitive treatment alternative to surgery. In definitive radiation therapy for non-resected MCC, 60-66 Gy administered in 2 Gy per fraction and five fractions per week is recommended. However, such frequent visits to the hospital can be a great burden to elderly patients and family members. In this report, we present the case of an 89-year-old patient with MCC (cT2N0M0, stage IIA) of the left cheek. The patient was treated with radiation therapy using a mild hypofractionated schedule (57 Gy provided in 3 Gy per fraction and three fractions per week) targeting the gross tumor. The treatment led to complete tumor remission with well-tolerated acute toxicities at three months post-irradiation. This case indicates that a mild hypofractionated irradiation schedule may achieve tumor control in MCC patients who are inoperable and who cannot make frequent hospital visits.

Definitive and Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Basal and Squamous Cell Cancers of the Skin: Executive Summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline reviews the evidence for the use of definitive and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) in patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on indications for RT in the definitive and postoperative setting for BCC and cSCC, as well as dose-fractionation schemes, target volumes, basic aspects of treatment planning, choice of radiation modality, and the role of systemic therapy in combination with radiation. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

The guideline recommends definitive RT as primary treatment for patients with BCC and cSCC who are not surgical candidates while conditionally recommending RT with an emphasis on shared decision-making in those situations in which adequate resection can lead to a less than satisfactory cosmetic or functional outcome. In the postoperative setting, a number of indications for RT after an adequate resection are provided while distinguishing the strength of the recommendations between BCC and cSCC. One key question is dedicated to defining indications for regional nodal irradiation. The task force suggests a range of appropriate dose-fractionation schemes for treatment of primary and nodal volumes in definitive and postoperative scenarios. The guideline also recommends against the use of carboplatin concurrently with adjuvant RT and conditionally recommends the use of systemic therapies for unresectable primaries where treatment may need escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Defining the role of RT in the management of BCC and cSCC has been hindered by a lack of high-quality evidence. This document synthesizes available evidence to define practice guidelines for the most common clinical situations. We encourage practitioners to enroll patients in prospective trials and to approach care in a multidisciplinary fashion whenever possible.

Current Role of Radiotherapy in Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) represents the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide, most being cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. The global incidence of NMSC continues to increase as the global population ages. Numerous treatment options are available for NMSC patients, with radiotherapy an efficacious and tissue-preserving non-surgical option. External beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy are modalities with specific indications and advantages in treating NMSC. Where excision is not an option (medically/technically inoperable) or considered less ideal (e.g. cosmetic or functional outcome), radiotherapy offers an excellent alternative. Inoperable elderly and/or co-morbid patients of poor performance status can benefit from short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy, with very acceptable toxicity. Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with unfavourable pathology can decrease the risk of local and regional recurrence and associated morbidity and mortality. Radiotherapy has advantages and disadvantages and it is important for clinicians to understand these. Managing patients with NMSC is carried out by clinicians from multiple disciplines but it is imperative that they are all aware of the role of radiotherapy in their patients in various clinical settings. Here we aim to discuss the role and indications for recommending radiotherapy in patients with NMSC.

Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Superficial Radiation Therapy for Treating Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers and Keloids

Background: The use of superficial radiation therapy (SRT) has experienced a renaissance for treating nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) and recurrent keloids; however, published treatment guidelines are lacking. Objective: The objective of this work was to provide consensus guidelines on the use of SRT for treating NMSC and recurrent keloids based on a review of the literature and expert opinion. Methods and Materials: A search of the medical literature was performed to obtain published information on the use of SRT for review. A group of qualified dermatologists convened to discuss their views on the use of SRT for the treatment of NMSCs and recurrent keloids. The various guidelines were considered to have consensus based on a supermajority two-thirds vote. The final consensus guidelines are thus based on the medical literature, when available, and expert opinions. Results: Agreement on consensus guidelines was reached for numerous aspects of SRT use, including appropriate tumor types for SRT; anatomical areas suitable for SRT; energy, fractions, and scheduling recommendations for SRT; use of SRT in the presence of comorbidities; safety factors; and treatment recommendations for recurrent keloids, based the literature and on both the opinions of the expert group and a survey of experienced users. Conclusion: Consensus was reached that SRT is a safe and effective treatment for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas and should be considered as the first-line form of radiation treatment. Postsurgical treatment of keloid excision suture lines with SRT significantly reduces keloid recurrence rates.

Place de la radiothérapie dans le traitement du carcinome basocellulaire

Radiotherapy is an available but not well-known treatment for management of basal cell carcinoma. National organizations have established that standard therapy is complete surgical removal and radiation therapy is an option for inoperable tumors or those where the post-operative defect would be cosmetically disfiguring or functionally disabling. These therapeutic options, with histological sample, should be considered in the multidisciplinary management of patients with basal cell carcinoma. There are several types of radiotherapy: external radiation or interstitial brachytherapy, unfortunately, there is no consensus in the literature and the range of radiation regimens in common use is large. Very few randomized studies have been conducted to defi the optimum treatment in terms of recurrence rate, cosmetic outcome and side-eff In most of studies, the overall local control rate was between 80-100% and over 90% of patients reported good or excellent cosmetic outcome. Side-eff of radiotherapy most commonly reported are minor but in young patients one must be alert to the theoretical possibility of the induction of secondary malignancies. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Prise en charge des carcinomes basocellulaires difficiles à traiter réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Sun Pharma.

Skin CanceR Brachytherapy vs External beam radiation therapy (SCRiBE) meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare cosmesis and local recurrence (LR) of definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs brachytherapy (BT) for indolent basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies including patients with T1-2 N0 SCCs/BCCs treated with definitive EBRT/BT and ≥10 months follow-up were analyzed. The primary endpoint was post-treatment cosmesis, categorized as "good," "fair," or "poor." The secondary endpoint was LR. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate weighted linear relationships between biologically equivalent doses with α/β = 3 (BED3) and cosmetic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 9965 patients received EBRT and 553 received BT across 24 studies. Mean age was 73 years, median follow-up was 36 months, and median dose was 45 Gy/10 fractions at 4.4 Gy/fraction. At BED3 of 100 Gy, "good" cosmesis was more frequently observed in patients receiving BT, 95% (95% CI: 88-100%) vs 79% (95% CI: 60-82%), p < 0.05. Similar results were found for "good" cosmesis at BED3 >100 Gy. No difference in "poor" cosmesis was noted at any BED3. LR was <7% for both at one year.

CONCLUSION

BT has favorable cosmesis over EBRT for skin SCCs/BCCs at common fractionation regimens. Prospective studies comparing EBRT vs BT are warranted.