A case-control study to identify molecular risk factors for local recurrence in young breast cancer patients

Ipsilateral Breast Carcinoma Recurrence: True Recurrence or New Primary? A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Study

Determining whether an ipsilateral breast carcinoma recurrence is a true recurrence or a new primary remains challenging based solely on clinicopathologic features. Algorithms based on these features have estimated that up to 68% of recurrences might be new primaries. However, few studies have analyzed the clonal relationship between primary and secondary carcinomas to establish the true nature of recurrences. This study analyzed 70 breast carcinomas from 33 patients using immunohistochemistry, FISH, and massive parallel sequencing. We compared 35 primary carcinomas with the associated recurrences, identifying 24 (68.6%) as true recurrences, 7 (20%) as new primaries, and 4 (11%) as undetermined. Twenty-eight primary carcinomas were invasive carcinomas (22 of no special type, 5 invasive lobular, and 1 invasive micropapillary carcinoma), and 7 were in situ (6 ductal and 1 lobular). Time to recurrence was longer for new primaries (median 12.8 y) than for true recurrences (median 6.8 y). Among the new primary cases, 6 of 7 (85%) patients had undergone mastectomy as their initial treatment. Clinicopathologic classifications of invasive carcinomas overestimated the number of new primaries (41.6% to 68.6%), partially due to phenotype conversion in 14% of true recurrences. Although 41.7% of recurrences showed private mutations or amplifications relevant to tumor progression, such as PIK3CA, PIK3R1, MAP3K1, AKT1, GATA3, CCND1, MDM4 , or T P 5 3 ; a common mutational progression pattern was not identified. Further studies, including larger series, are necessary to evaluate the prognostic significance of the molecular classification of recurrences.

The King is in the altogether: Radiation therapy after oncoplastic breast surgery

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy, and the majority of the patients are diagnosed at an early disease stage. Breast conservation is the preferred locoregional approach, and oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is becoming more popular. This narrative review aims to discuss the challenges and uncertainties in target volume definition for postoperative radiation after these procedures, to improve radiation therapy decisions and encourage multidisciplinary.

Mapping the location of local and regional recurrences according to breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy: Results from EORTC 22922/10925

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the extent of surgery and radiation therapy (RT) on the rates and sites of local (LR) and regional recurrences (RR) in the EORTC 22922/10925 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All data were extracted from the trial's individual patients' case report forms (CRF) and analysed with a median follow-up of 15.7 years. Cumulative incidence curves were produced for LR and RR accounting for competing risks: an exploratory analysis of the effect of the extent of surgical and radiation treatments on LR rate was conducted using the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks and adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics. The significance level was set at 5%, 2-sided. Frequency tables were used to describe the spatial location of LR and RR.

RESULTS

Out of 4004 patients included in the trial, 282 (7%) patients experienced LR and 165 (4.1%) RR, respectively. Cumulative incidence rate of LR at 15 years was lower after mastectomy (3.1%) compared to BCS + RT (7.3%) (F&G: HR (Hazard Ratio) = 0.421, 95%CI = 0.282-0.628, p-value < 0.0001). LR were similar up to 3 years for both mastectomy and BCS but continued to occur at a steady rate for BCS + RT, only. The spatial location of the recurrence was related to the locoregional therapy applied and the absolute gain of RT correlated to stage of disease and extent of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of locoregional therapies impacts significantly on LR and RR rates and spatial location.

The role of the radiation therapy breast boost in the 2020s

Given that most local relapses of breast cancer occur proximal to the original location of the primary, the delivery of additional radiation dose to breast tissue that contained the original primary cancer (known as a "boost") has been a standard of care for some decades. In the context of falling relapse rates, however, it is an appropriate time to re-evaluate the role of the boost. This article reviews the evolution of the radiotherapy boost in breast cancer, discussing who to boost and how to boost in the 2020s, and arguing that, in both cases, less is more.

Multidisciplinary management and role of reirradiation in the treatment of a breast cancer patient with four locoregional recurrences

Breast cancer is a frequent and sometimes fatal disease. The risk of locoregional recurrence has considerably decreased since the introduction of adjuvant treatments (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy). Nevertheless, some patients present a risk of multiple local recurrences. We report here the case of a patient who had four locoregional breast cancer recurrences. There is currently no validated biomarker that allows the prediction of recurrence. Salvage surgery, most often mastectomy, remains the recommended treatment for the management of these recurrences in the irradiated field. However, increasingly, depending on the patient's wishes and the technical possibilities of multiple surgeries, the question of a second conservative treatment and reirradiation arises. This type of management must in all cases be multidisciplinary and in specialized centers. Reirradiation must in any case try to give maximum priority to the protection of healthy tissue already irradiated.

Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer following Breast Conservation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To evaluate the health-related quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in surgical breast cancer survivors who received breast conservation therapy (BCT) compared to mastectomy, we utilized a systematic review to conduct observational studies of QOL in patients with breast cancer following breast conservation therapy from their inception until October 2021. The PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were systematically searched to retrieve the observational studies. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied as an effect estimate and calculated using Stata 15 software. Nine studies comprising 2301 patients were included. The results showed that no significant differences compared to mastectomy were detected for global health status (P=0.971 and P=0.613), physical function (P=0.099), emotional function (P=0.096), cognitive function (P=0.377), social function (P=0.602), sexual functioning (P=0.072), and sexual enjoyment (P=0.142), while role function (P=0.036), body image (P=0.000), and future perspective (P=0.012) showed a significant difference for BCT when compared to mastectomy. When compared to breast reconstruction (BR), the BCT group was inferior at physical function (P=0.002) and cognitive function (P=0.040) but superior at body image (P=0.001). When used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) tool, BCT has better results in physical function (P=0.000), emotional function (P=0.000), and social function (P=0.000) than mastectomy. QOL outcomes after BCT were better than mastectomy in body image, future perspective, and role function. BCT may be an acceptable option in the study setting for breast cancer patients who pursue high QOL.

Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological efficacy of the IORT cohort and the WBI cohort, respectively, and compare the oncological efficacy between the cohorts.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a computerized retrieval to identify English published articles between 2000 and 2021 in the PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and APA PsycInfo databases. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate.

Results

A total of 38 studies were eligible, with 30,225 analyzed participants. A non-comparative binary meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted average 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts, respectively. The LRFS, DMFS, and OS (without restriction on the 5-year outcomes) between the two cohorts were further investigated by a comparative binary meta-analysis. The weighted average 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS in the IORT cohort were 96.3, 96.6, and 94.1%, respectively, and in the WBI cohort were 98.0, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively. Our pooled results indicated that the LRFS in the IORT cohort was significantly lower than that in the WBI cohort (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.36; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.66–3.36). Nevertheless, the comparisons of DMFS (pooled OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76–1.31), and OS (pooled OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79–1.14) between the IORT cohort with the WBI cohort were both not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Despite the drastically high 5-year oncological efficacy in both cohorts, the LRFS in the IORT cohort is significantly poorer than that in the WBI cohort, and DMFS and OS do not differ between cohorts.

Expert Discussion: Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy - Standard for All Indications?

n/a